Excuses, excuses
Abstract Justifications and excuses are defenses that exculpate. They are therefore much more like each other than like such defenses as diplomatic immunity, which does not exculpate. But they exculpate in different ways, and it has proven difficult to agree on just what that difference consists in....
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Baron, Marcia [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2006 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Criminal law and philosophy - Getzville, NY : HeinOnline, 2007, 1(2006), 1 vom: 14. Nov., Seite 21-39 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:1 ; year:2006 ; number:1 ; day:14 ; month:11 ; pages:21-39 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s11572-006-9001-2 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR020792433 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR020792433 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230330174019.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201006s2006 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11572-006-9001-2 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR020792433 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)s11572-006-9001-2-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Baron, Marcia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Excuses, excuses |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2006 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Justifications and excuses are defenses that exculpate. They are therefore much more like each other than like such defenses as diplomatic immunity, which does not exculpate. But they exculpate in different ways, and it has proven difficult to agree on just what that difference consists in. In this paper I take a step back from justification and excuse as concepts in criminal law, and look at the concepts as they arise in everyday life. To keep the task manageable, I focus primarily on excuses and excusing activities, distinguishing them from justifications as well as from other close relatives, in particular, forgiving and pardoning. I draw upon J.L. Austin’s classic “A Plea for Excuses,” but expand on his account, suggesting that we offer excuses for reasons besides those he mentions. My hope is that my examination of excuses and excusing activities will help us rethink our views on just how justifications and excuses differ, views which often are worked out without much attention to how these concepts function in everyday life and to the connection between offers of excuses and justifications and the “rules of civility.” | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Justification |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Excuse |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Civility |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Forgiving |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Pardoning |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Holding responsible |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Exempting |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Blaming |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a J.L. Austin |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Criminal law and philosophy |d Getzville, NY : HeinOnline, 2007 |g 1(2006), 1 vom: 14. Nov., Seite 21-39 |w (DE-627)534766692 |w (DE-600)2375989-6 |x 1871-9805 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:1 |g year:2006 |g number:1 |g day:14 |g month:11 |g pages:21-39 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11572-006-9001-2 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 1 |j 2006 |e 1 |b 14 |c 11 |h 21-39 | ||
| author_variant |
m b mb |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:18719805:2006----::xuee |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2006 |
| publishDate |
2006 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s11572-006-9001-2 doi (DE-627)SPR020792433 (SPR)s11572-006-9001-2-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Baron, Marcia verfasserin aut Excuses, excuses 2006 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006 Abstract Justifications and excuses are defenses that exculpate. They are therefore much more like each other than like such defenses as diplomatic immunity, which does not exculpate. But they exculpate in different ways, and it has proven difficult to agree on just what that difference consists in. In this paper I take a step back from justification and excuse as concepts in criminal law, and look at the concepts as they arise in everyday life. To keep the task manageable, I focus primarily on excuses and excusing activities, distinguishing them from justifications as well as from other close relatives, in particular, forgiving and pardoning. I draw upon J.L. Austin’s classic “A Plea for Excuses,” but expand on his account, suggesting that we offer excuses for reasons besides those he mentions. My hope is that my examination of excuses and excusing activities will help us rethink our views on just how justifications and excuses differ, views which often are worked out without much attention to how these concepts function in everyday life and to the connection between offers of excuses and justifications and the “rules of civility.” Justification (dpeaa)DE-He213 Excuse (dpeaa)DE-He213 Civility (dpeaa)DE-He213 Forgiving (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pardoning (dpeaa)DE-He213 Holding responsible (dpeaa)DE-He213 Exempting (dpeaa)DE-He213 Blaming (dpeaa)DE-He213 J.L. Austin (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enthalten in Criminal law and philosophy Getzville, NY : HeinOnline, 2007 1(2006), 1 vom: 14. Nov., Seite 21-39 (DE-627)534766692 (DE-600)2375989-6 1871-9805 nnns volume:1 year:2006 number:1 day:14 month:11 pages:21-39 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11572-006-9001-2 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 1 2006 1 14 11 21-39 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s11572-006-9001-2 doi (DE-627)SPR020792433 (SPR)s11572-006-9001-2-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Baron, Marcia verfasserin aut Excuses, excuses 2006 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006 Abstract Justifications and excuses are defenses that exculpate. They are therefore much more like each other than like such defenses as diplomatic immunity, which does not exculpate. But they exculpate in different ways, and it has proven difficult to agree on just what that difference consists in. In this paper I take a step back from justification and excuse as concepts in criminal law, and look at the concepts as they arise in everyday life. To keep the task manageable, I focus primarily on excuses and excusing activities, distinguishing them from justifications as well as from other close relatives, in particular, forgiving and pardoning. I draw upon J.L. Austin’s classic “A Plea for Excuses,” but expand on his account, suggesting that we offer excuses for reasons besides those he mentions. My hope is that my examination of excuses and excusing activities will help us rethink our views on just how justifications and excuses differ, views which often are worked out without much attention to how these concepts function in everyday life and to the connection between offers of excuses and justifications and the “rules of civility.” Justification (dpeaa)DE-He213 Excuse (dpeaa)DE-He213 Civility (dpeaa)DE-He213 Forgiving (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pardoning (dpeaa)DE-He213 Holding responsible (dpeaa)DE-He213 Exempting (dpeaa)DE-He213 Blaming (dpeaa)DE-He213 J.L. Austin (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enthalten in Criminal law and philosophy Getzville, NY : HeinOnline, 2007 1(2006), 1 vom: 14. Nov., Seite 21-39 (DE-627)534766692 (DE-600)2375989-6 1871-9805 nnns volume:1 year:2006 number:1 day:14 month:11 pages:21-39 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11572-006-9001-2 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 1 2006 1 14 11 21-39 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s11572-006-9001-2 doi (DE-627)SPR020792433 (SPR)s11572-006-9001-2-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Baron, Marcia verfasserin aut Excuses, excuses 2006 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006 Abstract Justifications and excuses are defenses that exculpate. They are therefore much more like each other than like such defenses as diplomatic immunity, which does not exculpate. But they exculpate in different ways, and it has proven difficult to agree on just what that difference consists in. In this paper I take a step back from justification and excuse as concepts in criminal law, and look at the concepts as they arise in everyday life. To keep the task manageable, I focus primarily on excuses and excusing activities, distinguishing them from justifications as well as from other close relatives, in particular, forgiving and pardoning. I draw upon J.L. Austin’s classic “A Plea for Excuses,” but expand on his account, suggesting that we offer excuses for reasons besides those he mentions. My hope is that my examination of excuses and excusing activities will help us rethink our views on just how justifications and excuses differ, views which often are worked out without much attention to how these concepts function in everyday life and to the connection between offers of excuses and justifications and the “rules of civility.” Justification (dpeaa)DE-He213 Excuse (dpeaa)DE-He213 Civility (dpeaa)DE-He213 Forgiving (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pardoning (dpeaa)DE-He213 Holding responsible (dpeaa)DE-He213 Exempting (dpeaa)DE-He213 Blaming (dpeaa)DE-He213 J.L. Austin (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enthalten in Criminal law and philosophy Getzville, NY : HeinOnline, 2007 1(2006), 1 vom: 14. Nov., Seite 21-39 (DE-627)534766692 (DE-600)2375989-6 1871-9805 nnns volume:1 year:2006 number:1 day:14 month:11 pages:21-39 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11572-006-9001-2 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 1 2006 1 14 11 21-39 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s11572-006-9001-2 doi (DE-627)SPR020792433 (SPR)s11572-006-9001-2-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Baron, Marcia verfasserin aut Excuses, excuses 2006 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006 Abstract Justifications and excuses are defenses that exculpate. They are therefore much more like each other than like such defenses as diplomatic immunity, which does not exculpate. But they exculpate in different ways, and it has proven difficult to agree on just what that difference consists in. In this paper I take a step back from justification and excuse as concepts in criminal law, and look at the concepts as they arise in everyday life. To keep the task manageable, I focus primarily on excuses and excusing activities, distinguishing them from justifications as well as from other close relatives, in particular, forgiving and pardoning. I draw upon J.L. Austin’s classic “A Plea for Excuses,” but expand on his account, suggesting that we offer excuses for reasons besides those he mentions. My hope is that my examination of excuses and excusing activities will help us rethink our views on just how justifications and excuses differ, views which often are worked out without much attention to how these concepts function in everyday life and to the connection between offers of excuses and justifications and the “rules of civility.” Justification (dpeaa)DE-He213 Excuse (dpeaa)DE-He213 Civility (dpeaa)DE-He213 Forgiving (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pardoning (dpeaa)DE-He213 Holding responsible (dpeaa)DE-He213 Exempting (dpeaa)DE-He213 Blaming (dpeaa)DE-He213 J.L. Austin (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enthalten in Criminal law and philosophy Getzville, NY : HeinOnline, 2007 1(2006), 1 vom: 14. Nov., Seite 21-39 (DE-627)534766692 (DE-600)2375989-6 1871-9805 nnns volume:1 year:2006 number:1 day:14 month:11 pages:21-39 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11572-006-9001-2 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 1 2006 1 14 11 21-39 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s11572-006-9001-2 doi (DE-627)SPR020792433 (SPR)s11572-006-9001-2-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Baron, Marcia verfasserin aut Excuses, excuses 2006 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006 Abstract Justifications and excuses are defenses that exculpate. They are therefore much more like each other than like such defenses as diplomatic immunity, which does not exculpate. But they exculpate in different ways, and it has proven difficult to agree on just what that difference consists in. In this paper I take a step back from justification and excuse as concepts in criminal law, and look at the concepts as they arise in everyday life. To keep the task manageable, I focus primarily on excuses and excusing activities, distinguishing them from justifications as well as from other close relatives, in particular, forgiving and pardoning. I draw upon J.L. Austin’s classic “A Plea for Excuses,” but expand on his account, suggesting that we offer excuses for reasons besides those he mentions. My hope is that my examination of excuses and excusing activities will help us rethink our views on just how justifications and excuses differ, views which often are worked out without much attention to how these concepts function in everyday life and to the connection between offers of excuses and justifications and the “rules of civility.” Justification (dpeaa)DE-He213 Excuse (dpeaa)DE-He213 Civility (dpeaa)DE-He213 Forgiving (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pardoning (dpeaa)DE-He213 Holding responsible (dpeaa)DE-He213 Exempting (dpeaa)DE-He213 Blaming (dpeaa)DE-He213 J.L. Austin (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enthalten in Criminal law and philosophy Getzville, NY : HeinOnline, 2007 1(2006), 1 vom: 14. Nov., Seite 21-39 (DE-627)534766692 (DE-600)2375989-6 1871-9805 nnns volume:1 year:2006 number:1 day:14 month:11 pages:21-39 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11572-006-9001-2 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 1 2006 1 14 11 21-39 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Criminal law and philosophy 1(2006), 1 vom: 14. Nov., Seite 21-39 volume:1 year:2006 number:1 day:14 month:11 pages:21-39 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Criminal law and philosophy 1(2006), 1 vom: 14. Nov., Seite 21-39 volume:1 year:2006 number:1 day:14 month:11 pages:21-39 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Justification Excuse Civility Forgiving Pardoning Holding responsible Exempting Blaming J.L. Austin |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Criminal law and philosophy |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Baron, Marcia @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2006-11-14T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
534766692 |
| id |
SPR020792433 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR020792433</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230330174019.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201006s2006 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11572-006-9001-2</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR020792433</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s11572-006-9001-2-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Baron, Marcia</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Excuses, excuses</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Justifications and excuses are defenses that exculpate. They are therefore much more like each other than like such defenses as diplomatic immunity, which does not exculpate. But they exculpate in different ways, and it has proven difficult to agree on just what that difference consists in. In this paper I take a step back from justification and excuse as concepts in criminal law, and look at the concepts as they arise in everyday life. To keep the task manageable, I focus primarily on excuses and excusing activities, distinguishing them from justifications as well as from other close relatives, in particular, forgiving and pardoning. I draw upon J.L. Austin’s classic “A Plea for Excuses,” but expand on his account, suggesting that we offer excuses for reasons besides those he mentions. My hope is that my examination of excuses and excusing activities will help us rethink our views on just how justifications and excuses differ, views which often are worked out without much attention to how these concepts function in everyday life and to the connection between offers of excuses and justifications and the “rules of civility.”</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Justification</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Excuse</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Civility</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Forgiving</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pardoning</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Holding responsible</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Exempting</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Blaming</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">J.L. Austin</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Criminal law and philosophy</subfield><subfield code="d">Getzville, NY : HeinOnline, 2007</subfield><subfield code="g">1(2006), 1 vom: 14. Nov., Seite 21-39</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)534766692</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2375989-6</subfield><subfield code="x">1871-9805</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:1</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2006</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:14</subfield><subfield code="g">month:11</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:21-39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11572-006-9001-2</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">1</subfield><subfield code="j">2006</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">14</subfield><subfield code="c">11</subfield><subfield code="h">21-39</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Baron, Marcia |
| spellingShingle |
Baron, Marcia misc Justification misc Excuse misc Civility misc Forgiving misc Pardoning misc Holding responsible misc Exempting misc Blaming misc J.L. Austin Excuses, excuses |
| authorStr |
Baron, Marcia |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)534766692 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1871-9805 |
| topic_title |
Excuses, excuses Justification (dpeaa)DE-He213 Excuse (dpeaa)DE-He213 Civility (dpeaa)DE-He213 Forgiving (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pardoning (dpeaa)DE-He213 Holding responsible (dpeaa)DE-He213 Exempting (dpeaa)DE-He213 Blaming (dpeaa)DE-He213 J.L. Austin (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
misc Justification misc Excuse misc Civility misc Forgiving misc Pardoning misc Holding responsible misc Exempting misc Blaming misc J.L. Austin |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Justification misc Excuse misc Civility misc Forgiving misc Pardoning misc Holding responsible misc Exempting misc Blaming misc J.L. Austin |
| topic_browse |
misc Justification misc Excuse misc Civility misc Forgiving misc Pardoning misc Holding responsible misc Exempting misc Blaming misc J.L. Austin |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Criminal law and philosophy |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
534766692 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Criminal law and philosophy |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)534766692 (DE-600)2375989-6 |
| title |
Excuses, excuses |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR020792433 (SPR)s11572-006-9001-2-e |
| title_full |
Excuses, excuses |
| author_sort |
Baron, Marcia |
| journal |
Criminal law and philosophy |
| journalStr |
Criminal law and philosophy |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2006 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
21 |
| author_browse |
Baron, Marcia |
| container_volume |
1 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Baron, Marcia |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s11572-006-9001-2 |
| title_sort |
excuses, excuses |
| title_auth |
Excuses, excuses |
| abstract |
Abstract Justifications and excuses are defenses that exculpate. They are therefore much more like each other than like such defenses as diplomatic immunity, which does not exculpate. But they exculpate in different ways, and it has proven difficult to agree on just what that difference consists in. In this paper I take a step back from justification and excuse as concepts in criminal law, and look at the concepts as they arise in everyday life. To keep the task manageable, I focus primarily on excuses and excusing activities, distinguishing them from justifications as well as from other close relatives, in particular, forgiving and pardoning. I draw upon J.L. Austin’s classic “A Plea for Excuses,” but expand on his account, suggesting that we offer excuses for reasons besides those he mentions. My hope is that my examination of excuses and excusing activities will help us rethink our views on just how justifications and excuses differ, views which often are worked out without much attention to how these concepts function in everyday life and to the connection between offers of excuses and justifications and the “rules of civility.” © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract Justifications and excuses are defenses that exculpate. They are therefore much more like each other than like such defenses as diplomatic immunity, which does not exculpate. But they exculpate in different ways, and it has proven difficult to agree on just what that difference consists in. In this paper I take a step back from justification and excuse as concepts in criminal law, and look at the concepts as they arise in everyday life. To keep the task manageable, I focus primarily on excuses and excusing activities, distinguishing them from justifications as well as from other close relatives, in particular, forgiving and pardoning. I draw upon J.L. Austin’s classic “A Plea for Excuses,” but expand on his account, suggesting that we offer excuses for reasons besides those he mentions. My hope is that my examination of excuses and excusing activities will help us rethink our views on just how justifications and excuses differ, views which often are worked out without much attention to how these concepts function in everyday life and to the connection between offers of excuses and justifications and the “rules of civility.” © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Justifications and excuses are defenses that exculpate. They are therefore much more like each other than like such defenses as diplomatic immunity, which does not exculpate. But they exculpate in different ways, and it has proven difficult to agree on just what that difference consists in. In this paper I take a step back from justification and excuse as concepts in criminal law, and look at the concepts as they arise in everyday life. To keep the task manageable, I focus primarily on excuses and excusing activities, distinguishing them from justifications as well as from other close relatives, in particular, forgiving and pardoning. I draw upon J.L. Austin’s classic “A Plea for Excuses,” but expand on his account, suggesting that we offer excuses for reasons besides those he mentions. My hope is that my examination of excuses and excusing activities will help us rethink our views on just how justifications and excuses differ, views which often are worked out without much attention to how these concepts function in everyday life and to the connection between offers of excuses and justifications and the “rules of civility.” © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
Excuses, excuses |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11572-006-9001-2 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
534766692 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s11572-006-9001-2 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T18:18:11.141Z |
| _version_ |
1803582901995962368 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR020792433</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230330174019.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201006s2006 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11572-006-9001-2</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR020792433</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s11572-006-9001-2-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Baron, Marcia</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Excuses, excuses</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Justifications and excuses are defenses that exculpate. They are therefore much more like each other than like such defenses as diplomatic immunity, which does not exculpate. But they exculpate in different ways, and it has proven difficult to agree on just what that difference consists in. In this paper I take a step back from justification and excuse as concepts in criminal law, and look at the concepts as they arise in everyday life. To keep the task manageable, I focus primarily on excuses and excusing activities, distinguishing them from justifications as well as from other close relatives, in particular, forgiving and pardoning. I draw upon J.L. Austin’s classic “A Plea for Excuses,” but expand on his account, suggesting that we offer excuses for reasons besides those he mentions. My hope is that my examination of excuses and excusing activities will help us rethink our views on just how justifications and excuses differ, views which often are worked out without much attention to how these concepts function in everyday life and to the connection between offers of excuses and justifications and the “rules of civility.”</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Justification</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Excuse</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Civility</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Forgiving</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pardoning</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Holding responsible</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Exempting</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Blaming</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">J.L. Austin</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Criminal law and philosophy</subfield><subfield code="d">Getzville, NY : HeinOnline, 2007</subfield><subfield code="g">1(2006), 1 vom: 14. Nov., Seite 21-39</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)534766692</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2375989-6</subfield><subfield code="x">1871-9805</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:1</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2006</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:14</subfield><subfield code="g">month:11</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:21-39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11572-006-9001-2</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">1</subfield><subfield code="j">2006</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">14</subfield><subfield code="c">11</subfield><subfield code="h">21-39</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3974905 |