Usefulness of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy
Objectives We started robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy using the da Vinci surgical system from June 2010 and operated on 30 cases by December 2013. Herein, we examined the usefulness of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and compared it with conventional esophagectomy by right thor...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Osaka, Yoshiaki [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2018 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery 2018 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery - Tōkyō : Springer Japan, 1998, 66(2018), 4 vom: 03. Feb., Seite 225-231 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:66 ; year:2018 ; number:4 ; day:03 ; month:02 ; pages:225-231 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s11748-018-0897-y |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR022598421 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR022598421 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230520001426.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201006s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11748-018-0897-y |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR022598421 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)s11748-018-0897-y-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Osaka, Yoshiaki |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0001-8725-2822 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Usefulness of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery 2018 | ||
| 520 | |a Objectives We started robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy using the da Vinci surgical system from June 2010 and operated on 30 cases by December 2013. Herein, we examined the usefulness of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and compared it with conventional esophagectomy by right thoracotomy. Methods Patients requiring an invasion depth of up to the muscularis propria with preoperative diagnosis were considered for surgical adaptation, excluding bulky lymph node metastasis or salvage surgery cases. The outcomes of 30 patients who underwent robot-assisted surgery (robot group) and 30 patients who underwent conventional esophagectomy by right thoracotomy (thoracotomy group) up to December 2013 were retrospectively examined. Five ports were used in the robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy: 3rd intercostal (da Vinci right arm), 6th intercostal (da Vinci camera), 9th intercostal (da Vinci left arm), 4th and 8th intercostals (for assistance). Results There was no significant difference in patient characteristics. Robot group/right thoracotomy group: Operation time, 563/398 min; thoracic procedure bleeding volume, 21/135 ml; number of thoracic lymph node radical dissections, 25/23. Postoperative complications were recurrent nerve paralysis, 16.7/16.7%; pneumonia, 6.7%/10.0%; anastomotic leakage, 10.0/20.0%; surgical site infection, 0/10.0%; hospitalization, 17/30 days. For the robot group, the operation time was significantly longer, but the amount of intraoperative bleeding and postoperative hospitalization were significantly reduced. Conclusions Robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy enables delicate surgical procedures owing to the 3D effect of the field of view and articulated forceps of the da Vinci. This procedure reduces bleeding and postoperative hospitalization and is less invasive than conventional esophagectomy by right thoracotomy. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Da Vinci |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Robotic |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Esophagectomy |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Minimally invasive surgery |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tachibana, Shingo |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ota, Yoshihiro |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Suda, Takeshi |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Makuuti, Yosuke |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Watanabe, Takafumi |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Iwasaki, Kenichi |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Katsumata, Kenji |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tsuchida, Akihiko |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery |d Tōkyō : Springer Japan, 1998 |g 66(2018), 4 vom: 03. Feb., Seite 225-231 |w (DE-627)539545104 |w (DE-600)2381600-4 |x 1863-2092 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:66 |g year:2018 |g number:4 |g day:03 |g month:02 |g pages:225-231 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11748-018-0897-y |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_120 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_152 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_171 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_187 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_250 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_281 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 66 |j 2018 |e 4 |b 03 |c 02 |h 225-231 | ||
| author_variant |
y o yo s t st y o yo t s ts y m ym t w tw k i ki k k kk a t at |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:18632092:2018----::sflesfooassetoaocp |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2018 |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s11748-018-0897-y doi (DE-627)SPR022598421 (SPR)s11748-018-0897-y-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Osaka, Yoshiaki verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-8725-2822 aut Usefulness of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery 2018 Objectives We started robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy using the da Vinci surgical system from June 2010 and operated on 30 cases by December 2013. Herein, we examined the usefulness of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and compared it with conventional esophagectomy by right thoracotomy. Methods Patients requiring an invasion depth of up to the muscularis propria with preoperative diagnosis were considered for surgical adaptation, excluding bulky lymph node metastasis or salvage surgery cases. The outcomes of 30 patients who underwent robot-assisted surgery (robot group) and 30 patients who underwent conventional esophagectomy by right thoracotomy (thoracotomy group) up to December 2013 were retrospectively examined. Five ports were used in the robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy: 3rd intercostal (da Vinci right arm), 6th intercostal (da Vinci camera), 9th intercostal (da Vinci left arm), 4th and 8th intercostals (for assistance). Results There was no significant difference in patient characteristics. Robot group/right thoracotomy group: Operation time, 563/398 min; thoracic procedure bleeding volume, 21/135 ml; number of thoracic lymph node radical dissections, 25/23. Postoperative complications were recurrent nerve paralysis, 16.7/16.7%; pneumonia, 6.7%/10.0%; anastomotic leakage, 10.0/20.0%; surgical site infection, 0/10.0%; hospitalization, 17/30 days. For the robot group, the operation time was significantly longer, but the amount of intraoperative bleeding and postoperative hospitalization were significantly reduced. Conclusions Robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy enables delicate surgical procedures owing to the 3D effect of the field of view and articulated forceps of the da Vinci. This procedure reduces bleeding and postoperative hospitalization and is less invasive than conventional esophagectomy by right thoracotomy. Da Vinci (dpeaa)DE-He213 Robotic (dpeaa)DE-He213 Esophagectomy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Minimally invasive surgery (dpeaa)DE-He213 Tachibana, Shingo aut Ota, Yoshihiro aut Suda, Takeshi aut Makuuti, Yosuke aut Watanabe, Takafumi aut Iwasaki, Kenichi aut Katsumata, Kenji aut Tsuchida, Akihiko aut Enthalten in The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery Tōkyō : Springer Japan, 1998 66(2018), 4 vom: 03. Feb., Seite 225-231 (DE-627)539545104 (DE-600)2381600-4 1863-2092 nnns volume:66 year:2018 number:4 day:03 month:02 pages:225-231 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11748-018-0897-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 AR 66 2018 4 03 02 225-231 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s11748-018-0897-y doi (DE-627)SPR022598421 (SPR)s11748-018-0897-y-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Osaka, Yoshiaki verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-8725-2822 aut Usefulness of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery 2018 Objectives We started robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy using the da Vinci surgical system from June 2010 and operated on 30 cases by December 2013. Herein, we examined the usefulness of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and compared it with conventional esophagectomy by right thoracotomy. Methods Patients requiring an invasion depth of up to the muscularis propria with preoperative diagnosis were considered for surgical adaptation, excluding bulky lymph node metastasis or salvage surgery cases. The outcomes of 30 patients who underwent robot-assisted surgery (robot group) and 30 patients who underwent conventional esophagectomy by right thoracotomy (thoracotomy group) up to December 2013 were retrospectively examined. Five ports were used in the robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy: 3rd intercostal (da Vinci right arm), 6th intercostal (da Vinci camera), 9th intercostal (da Vinci left arm), 4th and 8th intercostals (for assistance). Results There was no significant difference in patient characteristics. Robot group/right thoracotomy group: Operation time, 563/398 min; thoracic procedure bleeding volume, 21/135 ml; number of thoracic lymph node radical dissections, 25/23. Postoperative complications were recurrent nerve paralysis, 16.7/16.7%; pneumonia, 6.7%/10.0%; anastomotic leakage, 10.0/20.0%; surgical site infection, 0/10.0%; hospitalization, 17/30 days. For the robot group, the operation time was significantly longer, but the amount of intraoperative bleeding and postoperative hospitalization were significantly reduced. Conclusions Robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy enables delicate surgical procedures owing to the 3D effect of the field of view and articulated forceps of the da Vinci. This procedure reduces bleeding and postoperative hospitalization and is less invasive than conventional esophagectomy by right thoracotomy. Da Vinci (dpeaa)DE-He213 Robotic (dpeaa)DE-He213 Esophagectomy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Minimally invasive surgery (dpeaa)DE-He213 Tachibana, Shingo aut Ota, Yoshihiro aut Suda, Takeshi aut Makuuti, Yosuke aut Watanabe, Takafumi aut Iwasaki, Kenichi aut Katsumata, Kenji aut Tsuchida, Akihiko aut Enthalten in The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery Tōkyō : Springer Japan, 1998 66(2018), 4 vom: 03. Feb., Seite 225-231 (DE-627)539545104 (DE-600)2381600-4 1863-2092 nnns volume:66 year:2018 number:4 day:03 month:02 pages:225-231 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11748-018-0897-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 AR 66 2018 4 03 02 225-231 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s11748-018-0897-y doi (DE-627)SPR022598421 (SPR)s11748-018-0897-y-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Osaka, Yoshiaki verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-8725-2822 aut Usefulness of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery 2018 Objectives We started robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy using the da Vinci surgical system from June 2010 and operated on 30 cases by December 2013. Herein, we examined the usefulness of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and compared it with conventional esophagectomy by right thoracotomy. Methods Patients requiring an invasion depth of up to the muscularis propria with preoperative diagnosis were considered for surgical adaptation, excluding bulky lymph node metastasis or salvage surgery cases. The outcomes of 30 patients who underwent robot-assisted surgery (robot group) and 30 patients who underwent conventional esophagectomy by right thoracotomy (thoracotomy group) up to December 2013 were retrospectively examined. Five ports were used in the robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy: 3rd intercostal (da Vinci right arm), 6th intercostal (da Vinci camera), 9th intercostal (da Vinci left arm), 4th and 8th intercostals (for assistance). Results There was no significant difference in patient characteristics. Robot group/right thoracotomy group: Operation time, 563/398 min; thoracic procedure bleeding volume, 21/135 ml; number of thoracic lymph node radical dissections, 25/23. Postoperative complications were recurrent nerve paralysis, 16.7/16.7%; pneumonia, 6.7%/10.0%; anastomotic leakage, 10.0/20.0%; surgical site infection, 0/10.0%; hospitalization, 17/30 days. For the robot group, the operation time was significantly longer, but the amount of intraoperative bleeding and postoperative hospitalization were significantly reduced. Conclusions Robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy enables delicate surgical procedures owing to the 3D effect of the field of view and articulated forceps of the da Vinci. This procedure reduces bleeding and postoperative hospitalization and is less invasive than conventional esophagectomy by right thoracotomy. Da Vinci (dpeaa)DE-He213 Robotic (dpeaa)DE-He213 Esophagectomy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Minimally invasive surgery (dpeaa)DE-He213 Tachibana, Shingo aut Ota, Yoshihiro aut Suda, Takeshi aut Makuuti, Yosuke aut Watanabe, Takafumi aut Iwasaki, Kenichi aut Katsumata, Kenji aut Tsuchida, Akihiko aut Enthalten in The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery Tōkyō : Springer Japan, 1998 66(2018), 4 vom: 03. Feb., Seite 225-231 (DE-627)539545104 (DE-600)2381600-4 1863-2092 nnns volume:66 year:2018 number:4 day:03 month:02 pages:225-231 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11748-018-0897-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 AR 66 2018 4 03 02 225-231 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s11748-018-0897-y doi (DE-627)SPR022598421 (SPR)s11748-018-0897-y-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Osaka, Yoshiaki verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-8725-2822 aut Usefulness of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery 2018 Objectives We started robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy using the da Vinci surgical system from June 2010 and operated on 30 cases by December 2013. Herein, we examined the usefulness of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and compared it with conventional esophagectomy by right thoracotomy. Methods Patients requiring an invasion depth of up to the muscularis propria with preoperative diagnosis were considered for surgical adaptation, excluding bulky lymph node metastasis or salvage surgery cases. The outcomes of 30 patients who underwent robot-assisted surgery (robot group) and 30 patients who underwent conventional esophagectomy by right thoracotomy (thoracotomy group) up to December 2013 were retrospectively examined. Five ports were used in the robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy: 3rd intercostal (da Vinci right arm), 6th intercostal (da Vinci camera), 9th intercostal (da Vinci left arm), 4th and 8th intercostals (for assistance). Results There was no significant difference in patient characteristics. Robot group/right thoracotomy group: Operation time, 563/398 min; thoracic procedure bleeding volume, 21/135 ml; number of thoracic lymph node radical dissections, 25/23. Postoperative complications were recurrent nerve paralysis, 16.7/16.7%; pneumonia, 6.7%/10.0%; anastomotic leakage, 10.0/20.0%; surgical site infection, 0/10.0%; hospitalization, 17/30 days. For the robot group, the operation time was significantly longer, but the amount of intraoperative bleeding and postoperative hospitalization were significantly reduced. Conclusions Robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy enables delicate surgical procedures owing to the 3D effect of the field of view and articulated forceps of the da Vinci. This procedure reduces bleeding and postoperative hospitalization and is less invasive than conventional esophagectomy by right thoracotomy. Da Vinci (dpeaa)DE-He213 Robotic (dpeaa)DE-He213 Esophagectomy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Minimally invasive surgery (dpeaa)DE-He213 Tachibana, Shingo aut Ota, Yoshihiro aut Suda, Takeshi aut Makuuti, Yosuke aut Watanabe, Takafumi aut Iwasaki, Kenichi aut Katsumata, Kenji aut Tsuchida, Akihiko aut Enthalten in The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery Tōkyō : Springer Japan, 1998 66(2018), 4 vom: 03. Feb., Seite 225-231 (DE-627)539545104 (DE-600)2381600-4 1863-2092 nnns volume:66 year:2018 number:4 day:03 month:02 pages:225-231 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11748-018-0897-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 AR 66 2018 4 03 02 225-231 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s11748-018-0897-y doi (DE-627)SPR022598421 (SPR)s11748-018-0897-y-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Osaka, Yoshiaki verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-8725-2822 aut Usefulness of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery 2018 Objectives We started robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy using the da Vinci surgical system from June 2010 and operated on 30 cases by December 2013. Herein, we examined the usefulness of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and compared it with conventional esophagectomy by right thoracotomy. Methods Patients requiring an invasion depth of up to the muscularis propria with preoperative diagnosis were considered for surgical adaptation, excluding bulky lymph node metastasis or salvage surgery cases. The outcomes of 30 patients who underwent robot-assisted surgery (robot group) and 30 patients who underwent conventional esophagectomy by right thoracotomy (thoracotomy group) up to December 2013 were retrospectively examined. Five ports were used in the robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy: 3rd intercostal (da Vinci right arm), 6th intercostal (da Vinci camera), 9th intercostal (da Vinci left arm), 4th and 8th intercostals (for assistance). Results There was no significant difference in patient characteristics. Robot group/right thoracotomy group: Operation time, 563/398 min; thoracic procedure bleeding volume, 21/135 ml; number of thoracic lymph node radical dissections, 25/23. Postoperative complications were recurrent nerve paralysis, 16.7/16.7%; pneumonia, 6.7%/10.0%; anastomotic leakage, 10.0/20.0%; surgical site infection, 0/10.0%; hospitalization, 17/30 days. For the robot group, the operation time was significantly longer, but the amount of intraoperative bleeding and postoperative hospitalization were significantly reduced. Conclusions Robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy enables delicate surgical procedures owing to the 3D effect of the field of view and articulated forceps of the da Vinci. This procedure reduces bleeding and postoperative hospitalization and is less invasive than conventional esophagectomy by right thoracotomy. Da Vinci (dpeaa)DE-He213 Robotic (dpeaa)DE-He213 Esophagectomy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Minimally invasive surgery (dpeaa)DE-He213 Tachibana, Shingo aut Ota, Yoshihiro aut Suda, Takeshi aut Makuuti, Yosuke aut Watanabe, Takafumi aut Iwasaki, Kenichi aut Katsumata, Kenji aut Tsuchida, Akihiko aut Enthalten in The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery Tōkyō : Springer Japan, 1998 66(2018), 4 vom: 03. Feb., Seite 225-231 (DE-627)539545104 (DE-600)2381600-4 1863-2092 nnns volume:66 year:2018 number:4 day:03 month:02 pages:225-231 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11748-018-0897-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 AR 66 2018 4 03 02 225-231 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 66(2018), 4 vom: 03. Feb., Seite 225-231 volume:66 year:2018 number:4 day:03 month:02 pages:225-231 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 66(2018), 4 vom: 03. Feb., Seite 225-231 volume:66 year:2018 number:4 day:03 month:02 pages:225-231 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Da Vinci Robotic Esophagectomy Minimally invasive surgery |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Osaka, Yoshiaki @@aut@@ Tachibana, Shingo @@aut@@ Ota, Yoshihiro @@aut@@ Suda, Takeshi @@aut@@ Makuuti, Yosuke @@aut@@ Watanabe, Takafumi @@aut@@ Iwasaki, Kenichi @@aut@@ Katsumata, Kenji @@aut@@ Tsuchida, Akihiko @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2018-02-03T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
539545104 |
| id |
SPR022598421 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR022598421</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230520001426.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201006s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11748-018-0897-y</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR022598421</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s11748-018-0897-y-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Osaka, Yoshiaki</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-8725-2822</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Usefulness of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery 2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Objectives We started robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy using the da Vinci surgical system from June 2010 and operated on 30 cases by December 2013. Herein, we examined the usefulness of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and compared it with conventional esophagectomy by right thoracotomy. Methods Patients requiring an invasion depth of up to the muscularis propria with preoperative diagnosis were considered for surgical adaptation, excluding bulky lymph node metastasis or salvage surgery cases. The outcomes of 30 patients who underwent robot-assisted surgery (robot group) and 30 patients who underwent conventional esophagectomy by right thoracotomy (thoracotomy group) up to December 2013 were retrospectively examined. Five ports were used in the robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy: 3rd intercostal (da Vinci right arm), 6th intercostal (da Vinci camera), 9th intercostal (da Vinci left arm), 4th and 8th intercostals (for assistance). Results There was no significant difference in patient characteristics. Robot group/right thoracotomy group: Operation time, 563/398 min; thoracic procedure bleeding volume, 21/135 ml; number of thoracic lymph node radical dissections, 25/23. Postoperative complications were recurrent nerve paralysis, 16.7/16.7%; pneumonia, 6.7%/10.0%; anastomotic leakage, 10.0/20.0%; surgical site infection, 0/10.0%; hospitalization, 17/30 days. For the robot group, the operation time was significantly longer, but the amount of intraoperative bleeding and postoperative hospitalization were significantly reduced. Conclusions Robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy enables delicate surgical procedures owing to the 3D effect of the field of view and articulated forceps of the da Vinci. This procedure reduces bleeding and postoperative hospitalization and is less invasive than conventional esophagectomy by right thoracotomy.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Da Vinci</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Robotic</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Esophagectomy</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Minimally invasive surgery</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tachibana, Shingo</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ota, Yoshihiro</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Suda, Takeshi</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Makuuti, Yosuke</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Watanabe, Takafumi</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Iwasaki, Kenichi</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Katsumata, Kenji</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tsuchida, Akihiko</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery</subfield><subfield code="d">Tōkyō : Springer Japan, 1998</subfield><subfield code="g">66(2018), 4 vom: 03. Feb., Seite 225-231</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)539545104</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2381600-4</subfield><subfield code="x">1863-2092</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:66</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">day:03</subfield><subfield code="g">month:02</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:225-231</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11748-018-0897-y</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">66</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="b">03</subfield><subfield code="c">02</subfield><subfield code="h">225-231</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Osaka, Yoshiaki |
| spellingShingle |
Osaka, Yoshiaki misc Da Vinci misc Robotic misc Esophagectomy misc Minimally invasive surgery Usefulness of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy |
| authorStr |
Osaka, Yoshiaki |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)539545104 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1863-2092 |
| topic_title |
Usefulness of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy Da Vinci (dpeaa)DE-He213 Robotic (dpeaa)DE-He213 Esophagectomy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Minimally invasive surgery (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
misc Da Vinci misc Robotic misc Esophagectomy misc Minimally invasive surgery |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Da Vinci misc Robotic misc Esophagectomy misc Minimally invasive surgery |
| topic_browse |
misc Da Vinci misc Robotic misc Esophagectomy misc Minimally invasive surgery |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
539545104 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)539545104 (DE-600)2381600-4 |
| title |
Usefulness of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR022598421 (SPR)s11748-018-0897-y-e |
| title_full |
Usefulness of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy |
| author_sort |
Osaka, Yoshiaki |
| journal |
The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery |
| journalStr |
The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2018 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
225 |
| author_browse |
Osaka, Yoshiaki Tachibana, Shingo Ota, Yoshihiro Suda, Takeshi Makuuti, Yosuke Watanabe, Takafumi Iwasaki, Kenichi Katsumata, Kenji Tsuchida, Akihiko |
| container_volume |
66 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Osaka, Yoshiaki |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s11748-018-0897-y |
| normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0001-8725-2822 |
| normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0001-8725-2822 |
| title_sort |
usefulness of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy |
| title_auth |
Usefulness of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy |
| abstract |
Objectives We started robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy using the da Vinci surgical system from June 2010 and operated on 30 cases by December 2013. Herein, we examined the usefulness of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and compared it with conventional esophagectomy by right thoracotomy. Methods Patients requiring an invasion depth of up to the muscularis propria with preoperative diagnosis were considered for surgical adaptation, excluding bulky lymph node metastasis or salvage surgery cases. The outcomes of 30 patients who underwent robot-assisted surgery (robot group) and 30 patients who underwent conventional esophagectomy by right thoracotomy (thoracotomy group) up to December 2013 were retrospectively examined. Five ports were used in the robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy: 3rd intercostal (da Vinci right arm), 6th intercostal (da Vinci camera), 9th intercostal (da Vinci left arm), 4th and 8th intercostals (for assistance). Results There was no significant difference in patient characteristics. Robot group/right thoracotomy group: Operation time, 563/398 min; thoracic procedure bleeding volume, 21/135 ml; number of thoracic lymph node radical dissections, 25/23. Postoperative complications were recurrent nerve paralysis, 16.7/16.7%; pneumonia, 6.7%/10.0%; anastomotic leakage, 10.0/20.0%; surgical site infection, 0/10.0%; hospitalization, 17/30 days. For the robot group, the operation time was significantly longer, but the amount of intraoperative bleeding and postoperative hospitalization were significantly reduced. Conclusions Robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy enables delicate surgical procedures owing to the 3D effect of the field of view and articulated forceps of the da Vinci. This procedure reduces bleeding and postoperative hospitalization and is less invasive than conventional esophagectomy by right thoracotomy. © The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery 2018 |
| abstractGer |
Objectives We started robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy using the da Vinci surgical system from June 2010 and operated on 30 cases by December 2013. Herein, we examined the usefulness of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and compared it with conventional esophagectomy by right thoracotomy. Methods Patients requiring an invasion depth of up to the muscularis propria with preoperative diagnosis were considered for surgical adaptation, excluding bulky lymph node metastasis or salvage surgery cases. The outcomes of 30 patients who underwent robot-assisted surgery (robot group) and 30 patients who underwent conventional esophagectomy by right thoracotomy (thoracotomy group) up to December 2013 were retrospectively examined. Five ports were used in the robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy: 3rd intercostal (da Vinci right arm), 6th intercostal (da Vinci camera), 9th intercostal (da Vinci left arm), 4th and 8th intercostals (for assistance). Results There was no significant difference in patient characteristics. Robot group/right thoracotomy group: Operation time, 563/398 min; thoracic procedure bleeding volume, 21/135 ml; number of thoracic lymph node radical dissections, 25/23. Postoperative complications were recurrent nerve paralysis, 16.7/16.7%; pneumonia, 6.7%/10.0%; anastomotic leakage, 10.0/20.0%; surgical site infection, 0/10.0%; hospitalization, 17/30 days. For the robot group, the operation time was significantly longer, but the amount of intraoperative bleeding and postoperative hospitalization were significantly reduced. Conclusions Robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy enables delicate surgical procedures owing to the 3D effect of the field of view and articulated forceps of the da Vinci. This procedure reduces bleeding and postoperative hospitalization and is less invasive than conventional esophagectomy by right thoracotomy. © The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery 2018 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Objectives We started robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy using the da Vinci surgical system from June 2010 and operated on 30 cases by December 2013. Herein, we examined the usefulness of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and compared it with conventional esophagectomy by right thoracotomy. Methods Patients requiring an invasion depth of up to the muscularis propria with preoperative diagnosis were considered for surgical adaptation, excluding bulky lymph node metastasis or salvage surgery cases. The outcomes of 30 patients who underwent robot-assisted surgery (robot group) and 30 patients who underwent conventional esophagectomy by right thoracotomy (thoracotomy group) up to December 2013 were retrospectively examined. Five ports were used in the robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy: 3rd intercostal (da Vinci right arm), 6th intercostal (da Vinci camera), 9th intercostal (da Vinci left arm), 4th and 8th intercostals (for assistance). Results There was no significant difference in patient characteristics. Robot group/right thoracotomy group: Operation time, 563/398 min; thoracic procedure bleeding volume, 21/135 ml; number of thoracic lymph node radical dissections, 25/23. Postoperative complications were recurrent nerve paralysis, 16.7/16.7%; pneumonia, 6.7%/10.0%; anastomotic leakage, 10.0/20.0%; surgical site infection, 0/10.0%; hospitalization, 17/30 days. For the robot group, the operation time was significantly longer, but the amount of intraoperative bleeding and postoperative hospitalization were significantly reduced. Conclusions Robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy enables delicate surgical procedures owing to the 3D effect of the field of view and articulated forceps of the da Vinci. This procedure reduces bleeding and postoperative hospitalization and is less invasive than conventional esophagectomy by right thoracotomy. © The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery 2018 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 |
| container_issue |
4 |
| title_short |
Usefulness of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11748-018-0897-y |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Tachibana, Shingo Ota, Yoshihiro Suda, Takeshi Makuuti, Yosuke Watanabe, Takafumi Iwasaki, Kenichi Katsumata, Kenji Tsuchida, Akihiko |
| author2Str |
Tachibana, Shingo Ota, Yoshihiro Suda, Takeshi Makuuti, Yosuke Watanabe, Takafumi Iwasaki, Kenichi Katsumata, Kenji Tsuchida, Akihiko |
| ppnlink |
539545104 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s11748-018-0897-y |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T13:55:48.922Z |
| _version_ |
1803566395088175104 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR022598421</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230520001426.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201006s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11748-018-0897-y</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR022598421</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s11748-018-0897-y-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Osaka, Yoshiaki</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-8725-2822</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Usefulness of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery 2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Objectives We started robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy using the da Vinci surgical system from June 2010 and operated on 30 cases by December 2013. Herein, we examined the usefulness of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and compared it with conventional esophagectomy by right thoracotomy. Methods Patients requiring an invasion depth of up to the muscularis propria with preoperative diagnosis were considered for surgical adaptation, excluding bulky lymph node metastasis or salvage surgery cases. The outcomes of 30 patients who underwent robot-assisted surgery (robot group) and 30 patients who underwent conventional esophagectomy by right thoracotomy (thoracotomy group) up to December 2013 were retrospectively examined. Five ports were used in the robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy: 3rd intercostal (da Vinci right arm), 6th intercostal (da Vinci camera), 9th intercostal (da Vinci left arm), 4th and 8th intercostals (for assistance). Results There was no significant difference in patient characteristics. Robot group/right thoracotomy group: Operation time, 563/398 min; thoracic procedure bleeding volume, 21/135 ml; number of thoracic lymph node radical dissections, 25/23. Postoperative complications were recurrent nerve paralysis, 16.7/16.7%; pneumonia, 6.7%/10.0%; anastomotic leakage, 10.0/20.0%; surgical site infection, 0/10.0%; hospitalization, 17/30 days. For the robot group, the operation time was significantly longer, but the amount of intraoperative bleeding and postoperative hospitalization were significantly reduced. Conclusions Robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy enables delicate surgical procedures owing to the 3D effect of the field of view and articulated forceps of the da Vinci. This procedure reduces bleeding and postoperative hospitalization and is less invasive than conventional esophagectomy by right thoracotomy.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Da Vinci</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Robotic</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Esophagectomy</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Minimally invasive surgery</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tachibana, Shingo</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ota, Yoshihiro</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Suda, Takeshi</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Makuuti, Yosuke</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Watanabe, Takafumi</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Iwasaki, Kenichi</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Katsumata, Kenji</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tsuchida, Akihiko</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery</subfield><subfield code="d">Tōkyō : Springer Japan, 1998</subfield><subfield code="g">66(2018), 4 vom: 03. Feb., Seite 225-231</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)539545104</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2381600-4</subfield><subfield code="x">1863-2092</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:66</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">day:03</subfield><subfield code="g">month:02</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:225-231</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11748-018-0897-y</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">66</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="b">03</subfield><subfield code="c">02</subfield><subfield code="h">225-231</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.401101 |