Science on the periphery: Can it contribute to mainstream science?
Abstract Science is a global phenomenon that knows no frontiers. But in the real world, production and efficient utilization of scientific knowledge are highly concentrated in a few countries. A large majority of countries—those on the periphery, contribute precious little to the growth of scientifi...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Arunachalam, Subbiah [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
1995 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Knowledge, technology and policy - Piscataway, NJ : Transaction Publ., 1998, 8(1995), 2 vom: Juni, Seite 68-87 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:8 ; year:1995 ; number:2 ; month:06 ; pages:68-87 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/BF02825969 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR024434620 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR024434620 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220111114640.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201006s1995 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/BF02825969 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR024434620 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)BF02825969-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 300 |q ASE |
| 084 | |a 05.20 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 50.04 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 71.43 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Arunachalam, Subbiah |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Science on the periphery: Can it contribute to mainstream science? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1995 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Science is a global phenomenon that knows no frontiers. But in the real world, production and efficient utilization of scientific knowledge are highly concentrated in a few countries. A large majority of countries—those on the periphery, contribute precious little to the growth of scientific knowledge. Indeed, the distribution of science is even more skewed than is the distribution of wealth among nations. As a result, peripheral countries are left out of the intellectual discourse that is at the very foundation of the knowledge enterprise. The extent of this skewness and the relative neglect of the perihpery can be seen in some quantitative form from publication and citation data. However, while it may be true that mainstream science has not greatly benefitted from the efforts of the periphery, scientifically advanced societies are certainly benefitting from the traditional medical and agricultural knowledge base of the peripheral societies. Countless numbers of plants used in the traditional medical systems of India, China, Africa and Latin America are being drafted into the western system of medicine. A number of multinationals are learning from folk medicine and are gathering tons of plant material from these regions for the manufacture of modern medicine. Ironically, very little transfer of knowledge from ancient to modern systems takes place in the pheripheral countries themselves. Even when it does occur, it does not result in the manufacture and marketing of products for profit. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Citation Report |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Peripheral Country |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Neem Extract |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Mainstream Science |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Secondary Service |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Knowledge, technology and policy |d Piscataway, NJ : Transaction Publ., 1998 |g 8(1995), 2 vom: Juni, Seite 68-87 |w (DE-627)324533993 |w (DE-600)2028456-1 |x 1874-6314 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:8 |g year:1995 |g number:2 |g month:06 |g pages:68-87 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02825969 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_150 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 05.20 |q ASE |
| 936 | b | k | |a 50.04 |q ASE |
| 936 | b | k | |a 71.43 |q ASE |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 8 |j 1995 |e 2 |c 06 |h 68-87 | ||
| author_variant |
s a sa |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:18746314:1995----::cecoteeihrcntotiueo |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
1995 |
| bklnumber |
05.20 50.04 71.43 |
| publishDate |
1995 |
| allfields |
10.1007/BF02825969 doi (DE-627)SPR024434620 (SPR)BF02825969-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 ASE 05.20 bkl 50.04 bkl 71.43 bkl Arunachalam, Subbiah verfasserin aut Science on the periphery: Can it contribute to mainstream science? 1995 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Science is a global phenomenon that knows no frontiers. But in the real world, production and efficient utilization of scientific knowledge are highly concentrated in a few countries. A large majority of countries—those on the periphery, contribute precious little to the growth of scientific knowledge. Indeed, the distribution of science is even more skewed than is the distribution of wealth among nations. As a result, peripheral countries are left out of the intellectual discourse that is at the very foundation of the knowledge enterprise. The extent of this skewness and the relative neglect of the perihpery can be seen in some quantitative form from publication and citation data. However, while it may be true that mainstream science has not greatly benefitted from the efforts of the periphery, scientifically advanced societies are certainly benefitting from the traditional medical and agricultural knowledge base of the peripheral societies. Countless numbers of plants used in the traditional medical systems of India, China, Africa and Latin America are being drafted into the western system of medicine. A number of multinationals are learning from folk medicine and are gathering tons of plant material from these regions for the manufacture of modern medicine. Ironically, very little transfer of knowledge from ancient to modern systems takes place in the pheripheral countries themselves. Even when it does occur, it does not result in the manufacture and marketing of products for profit. Journal Citation Report (dpeaa)DE-He213 Peripheral Country (dpeaa)DE-He213 Neem Extract (dpeaa)DE-He213 Mainstream Science (dpeaa)DE-He213 Secondary Service (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enthalten in Knowledge, technology and policy Piscataway, NJ : Transaction Publ., 1998 8(1995), 2 vom: Juni, Seite 68-87 (DE-627)324533993 (DE-600)2028456-1 1874-6314 nnns volume:8 year:1995 number:2 month:06 pages:68-87 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02825969 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_150 05.20 ASE 50.04 ASE 71.43 ASE AR 8 1995 2 06 68-87 |
| spelling |
10.1007/BF02825969 doi (DE-627)SPR024434620 (SPR)BF02825969-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 ASE 05.20 bkl 50.04 bkl 71.43 bkl Arunachalam, Subbiah verfasserin aut Science on the periphery: Can it contribute to mainstream science? 1995 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Science is a global phenomenon that knows no frontiers. But in the real world, production and efficient utilization of scientific knowledge are highly concentrated in a few countries. A large majority of countries—those on the periphery, contribute precious little to the growth of scientific knowledge. Indeed, the distribution of science is even more skewed than is the distribution of wealth among nations. As a result, peripheral countries are left out of the intellectual discourse that is at the very foundation of the knowledge enterprise. The extent of this skewness and the relative neglect of the perihpery can be seen in some quantitative form from publication and citation data. However, while it may be true that mainstream science has not greatly benefitted from the efforts of the periphery, scientifically advanced societies are certainly benefitting from the traditional medical and agricultural knowledge base of the peripheral societies. Countless numbers of plants used in the traditional medical systems of India, China, Africa and Latin America are being drafted into the western system of medicine. A number of multinationals are learning from folk medicine and are gathering tons of plant material from these regions for the manufacture of modern medicine. Ironically, very little transfer of knowledge from ancient to modern systems takes place in the pheripheral countries themselves. Even when it does occur, it does not result in the manufacture and marketing of products for profit. Journal Citation Report (dpeaa)DE-He213 Peripheral Country (dpeaa)DE-He213 Neem Extract (dpeaa)DE-He213 Mainstream Science (dpeaa)DE-He213 Secondary Service (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enthalten in Knowledge, technology and policy Piscataway, NJ : Transaction Publ., 1998 8(1995), 2 vom: Juni, Seite 68-87 (DE-627)324533993 (DE-600)2028456-1 1874-6314 nnns volume:8 year:1995 number:2 month:06 pages:68-87 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02825969 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_150 05.20 ASE 50.04 ASE 71.43 ASE AR 8 1995 2 06 68-87 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/BF02825969 doi (DE-627)SPR024434620 (SPR)BF02825969-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 ASE 05.20 bkl 50.04 bkl 71.43 bkl Arunachalam, Subbiah verfasserin aut Science on the periphery: Can it contribute to mainstream science? 1995 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Science is a global phenomenon that knows no frontiers. But in the real world, production and efficient utilization of scientific knowledge are highly concentrated in a few countries. A large majority of countries—those on the periphery, contribute precious little to the growth of scientific knowledge. Indeed, the distribution of science is even more skewed than is the distribution of wealth among nations. As a result, peripheral countries are left out of the intellectual discourse that is at the very foundation of the knowledge enterprise. The extent of this skewness and the relative neglect of the perihpery can be seen in some quantitative form from publication and citation data. However, while it may be true that mainstream science has not greatly benefitted from the efforts of the periphery, scientifically advanced societies are certainly benefitting from the traditional medical and agricultural knowledge base of the peripheral societies. Countless numbers of plants used in the traditional medical systems of India, China, Africa and Latin America are being drafted into the western system of medicine. A number of multinationals are learning from folk medicine and are gathering tons of plant material from these regions for the manufacture of modern medicine. Ironically, very little transfer of knowledge from ancient to modern systems takes place in the pheripheral countries themselves. Even when it does occur, it does not result in the manufacture and marketing of products for profit. Journal Citation Report (dpeaa)DE-He213 Peripheral Country (dpeaa)DE-He213 Neem Extract (dpeaa)DE-He213 Mainstream Science (dpeaa)DE-He213 Secondary Service (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enthalten in Knowledge, technology and policy Piscataway, NJ : Transaction Publ., 1998 8(1995), 2 vom: Juni, Seite 68-87 (DE-627)324533993 (DE-600)2028456-1 1874-6314 nnns volume:8 year:1995 number:2 month:06 pages:68-87 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02825969 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_150 05.20 ASE 50.04 ASE 71.43 ASE AR 8 1995 2 06 68-87 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/BF02825969 doi (DE-627)SPR024434620 (SPR)BF02825969-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 ASE 05.20 bkl 50.04 bkl 71.43 bkl Arunachalam, Subbiah verfasserin aut Science on the periphery: Can it contribute to mainstream science? 1995 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Science is a global phenomenon that knows no frontiers. But in the real world, production and efficient utilization of scientific knowledge are highly concentrated in a few countries. A large majority of countries—those on the periphery, contribute precious little to the growth of scientific knowledge. Indeed, the distribution of science is even more skewed than is the distribution of wealth among nations. As a result, peripheral countries are left out of the intellectual discourse that is at the very foundation of the knowledge enterprise. The extent of this skewness and the relative neglect of the perihpery can be seen in some quantitative form from publication and citation data. However, while it may be true that mainstream science has not greatly benefitted from the efforts of the periphery, scientifically advanced societies are certainly benefitting from the traditional medical and agricultural knowledge base of the peripheral societies. Countless numbers of plants used in the traditional medical systems of India, China, Africa and Latin America are being drafted into the western system of medicine. A number of multinationals are learning from folk medicine and are gathering tons of plant material from these regions for the manufacture of modern medicine. Ironically, very little transfer of knowledge from ancient to modern systems takes place in the pheripheral countries themselves. Even when it does occur, it does not result in the manufacture and marketing of products for profit. Journal Citation Report (dpeaa)DE-He213 Peripheral Country (dpeaa)DE-He213 Neem Extract (dpeaa)DE-He213 Mainstream Science (dpeaa)DE-He213 Secondary Service (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enthalten in Knowledge, technology and policy Piscataway, NJ : Transaction Publ., 1998 8(1995), 2 vom: Juni, Seite 68-87 (DE-627)324533993 (DE-600)2028456-1 1874-6314 nnns volume:8 year:1995 number:2 month:06 pages:68-87 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02825969 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_150 05.20 ASE 50.04 ASE 71.43 ASE AR 8 1995 2 06 68-87 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/BF02825969 doi (DE-627)SPR024434620 (SPR)BF02825969-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 300 ASE 05.20 bkl 50.04 bkl 71.43 bkl Arunachalam, Subbiah verfasserin aut Science on the periphery: Can it contribute to mainstream science? 1995 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Science is a global phenomenon that knows no frontiers. But in the real world, production and efficient utilization of scientific knowledge are highly concentrated in a few countries. A large majority of countries—those on the periphery, contribute precious little to the growth of scientific knowledge. Indeed, the distribution of science is even more skewed than is the distribution of wealth among nations. As a result, peripheral countries are left out of the intellectual discourse that is at the very foundation of the knowledge enterprise. The extent of this skewness and the relative neglect of the perihpery can be seen in some quantitative form from publication and citation data. However, while it may be true that mainstream science has not greatly benefitted from the efforts of the periphery, scientifically advanced societies are certainly benefitting from the traditional medical and agricultural knowledge base of the peripheral societies. Countless numbers of plants used in the traditional medical systems of India, China, Africa and Latin America are being drafted into the western system of medicine. A number of multinationals are learning from folk medicine and are gathering tons of plant material from these regions for the manufacture of modern medicine. Ironically, very little transfer of knowledge from ancient to modern systems takes place in the pheripheral countries themselves. Even when it does occur, it does not result in the manufacture and marketing of products for profit. Journal Citation Report (dpeaa)DE-He213 Peripheral Country (dpeaa)DE-He213 Neem Extract (dpeaa)DE-He213 Mainstream Science (dpeaa)DE-He213 Secondary Service (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enthalten in Knowledge, technology and policy Piscataway, NJ : Transaction Publ., 1998 8(1995), 2 vom: Juni, Seite 68-87 (DE-627)324533993 (DE-600)2028456-1 1874-6314 nnns volume:8 year:1995 number:2 month:06 pages:68-87 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02825969 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_150 05.20 ASE 50.04 ASE 71.43 ASE AR 8 1995 2 06 68-87 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Knowledge, technology and policy 8(1995), 2 vom: Juni, Seite 68-87 volume:8 year:1995 number:2 month:06 pages:68-87 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Knowledge, technology and policy 8(1995), 2 vom: Juni, Seite 68-87 volume:8 year:1995 number:2 month:06 pages:68-87 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Journal Citation Report Peripheral Country Neem Extract Mainstream Science Secondary Service |
| dewey-raw |
300 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Knowledge, technology and policy |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Arunachalam, Subbiah @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
1995-06-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
324533993 |
| dewey-sort |
3300 |
| id |
SPR024434620 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR024434620</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220111114640.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201006s1995 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/BF02825969</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR024434620</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)BF02825969-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">05.20</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">50.04</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">71.43</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Arunachalam, Subbiah</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Science on the periphery: Can it contribute to mainstream science?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1995</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Science is a global phenomenon that knows no frontiers. But in the real world, production and efficient utilization of scientific knowledge are highly concentrated in a few countries. A large majority of countries—those on the periphery, contribute precious little to the growth of scientific knowledge. Indeed, the distribution of science is even more skewed than is the distribution of wealth among nations. As a result, peripheral countries are left out of the intellectual discourse that is at the very foundation of the knowledge enterprise. The extent of this skewness and the relative neglect of the perihpery can be seen in some quantitative form from publication and citation data. However, while it may be true that mainstream science has not greatly benefitted from the efforts of the periphery, scientifically advanced societies are certainly benefitting from the traditional medical and agricultural knowledge base of the peripheral societies. Countless numbers of plants used in the traditional medical systems of India, China, Africa and Latin America are being drafted into the western system of medicine. A number of multinationals are learning from folk medicine and are gathering tons of plant material from these regions for the manufacture of modern medicine. Ironically, very little transfer of knowledge from ancient to modern systems takes place in the pheripheral countries themselves. Even when it does occur, it does not result in the manufacture and marketing of products for profit.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Journal Citation Report</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Peripheral Country</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Neem Extract</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Mainstream Science</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Secondary Service</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Knowledge, technology and policy</subfield><subfield code="d">Piscataway, NJ : Transaction Publ., 1998</subfield><subfield code="g">8(1995), 2 vom: Juni, Seite 68-87</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)324533993</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2028456-1</subfield><subfield code="x">1874-6314</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1995</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">month:06</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:68-87</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02825969</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">05.20</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">50.04</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">71.43</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">1995</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="c">06</subfield><subfield code="h">68-87</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Arunachalam, Subbiah |
| spellingShingle |
Arunachalam, Subbiah ddc 300 bkl 05.20 bkl 50.04 bkl 71.43 misc Journal Citation Report misc Peripheral Country misc Neem Extract misc Mainstream Science misc Secondary Service Science on the periphery: Can it contribute to mainstream science? |
| authorStr |
Arunachalam, Subbiah |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)324533993 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
300 - Social sciences |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1874-6314 |
| topic_title |
300 ASE 05.20 bkl 50.04 bkl 71.43 bkl Science on the periphery: Can it contribute to mainstream science? Journal Citation Report (dpeaa)DE-He213 Peripheral Country (dpeaa)DE-He213 Neem Extract (dpeaa)DE-He213 Mainstream Science (dpeaa)DE-He213 Secondary Service (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
ddc 300 bkl 05.20 bkl 50.04 bkl 71.43 misc Journal Citation Report misc Peripheral Country misc Neem Extract misc Mainstream Science misc Secondary Service |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 300 bkl 05.20 bkl 50.04 bkl 71.43 misc Journal Citation Report misc Peripheral Country misc Neem Extract misc Mainstream Science misc Secondary Service |
| topic_browse |
ddc 300 bkl 05.20 bkl 50.04 bkl 71.43 misc Journal Citation Report misc Peripheral Country misc Neem Extract misc Mainstream Science misc Secondary Service |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Knowledge, technology and policy |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
324533993 |
| dewey-tens |
300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Knowledge, technology and policy |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)324533993 (DE-600)2028456-1 |
| title |
Science on the periphery: Can it contribute to mainstream science? |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR024434620 (SPR)BF02825969-e |
| title_full |
Science on the periphery: Can it contribute to mainstream science? |
| author_sort |
Arunachalam, Subbiah |
| journal |
Knowledge, technology and policy |
| journalStr |
Knowledge, technology and policy |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
1995 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
68 |
| author_browse |
Arunachalam, Subbiah |
| container_volume |
8 |
| class |
300 ASE 05.20 bkl 50.04 bkl 71.43 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Arunachalam, Subbiah |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/BF02825969 |
| dewey-full |
300 |
| title_sort |
science on the periphery: can it contribute to mainstream science? |
| title_auth |
Science on the periphery: Can it contribute to mainstream science? |
| abstract |
Abstract Science is a global phenomenon that knows no frontiers. But in the real world, production and efficient utilization of scientific knowledge are highly concentrated in a few countries. A large majority of countries—those on the periphery, contribute precious little to the growth of scientific knowledge. Indeed, the distribution of science is even more skewed than is the distribution of wealth among nations. As a result, peripheral countries are left out of the intellectual discourse that is at the very foundation of the knowledge enterprise. The extent of this skewness and the relative neglect of the perihpery can be seen in some quantitative form from publication and citation data. However, while it may be true that mainstream science has not greatly benefitted from the efforts of the periphery, scientifically advanced societies are certainly benefitting from the traditional medical and agricultural knowledge base of the peripheral societies. Countless numbers of plants used in the traditional medical systems of India, China, Africa and Latin America are being drafted into the western system of medicine. A number of multinationals are learning from folk medicine and are gathering tons of plant material from these regions for the manufacture of modern medicine. Ironically, very little transfer of knowledge from ancient to modern systems takes place in the pheripheral countries themselves. Even when it does occur, it does not result in the manufacture and marketing of products for profit. |
| abstractGer |
Abstract Science is a global phenomenon that knows no frontiers. But in the real world, production and efficient utilization of scientific knowledge are highly concentrated in a few countries. A large majority of countries—those on the periphery, contribute precious little to the growth of scientific knowledge. Indeed, the distribution of science is even more skewed than is the distribution of wealth among nations. As a result, peripheral countries are left out of the intellectual discourse that is at the very foundation of the knowledge enterprise. The extent of this skewness and the relative neglect of the perihpery can be seen in some quantitative form from publication and citation data. However, while it may be true that mainstream science has not greatly benefitted from the efforts of the periphery, scientifically advanced societies are certainly benefitting from the traditional medical and agricultural knowledge base of the peripheral societies. Countless numbers of plants used in the traditional medical systems of India, China, Africa and Latin America are being drafted into the western system of medicine. A number of multinationals are learning from folk medicine and are gathering tons of plant material from these regions for the manufacture of modern medicine. Ironically, very little transfer of knowledge from ancient to modern systems takes place in the pheripheral countries themselves. Even when it does occur, it does not result in the manufacture and marketing of products for profit. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Science is a global phenomenon that knows no frontiers. But in the real world, production and efficient utilization of scientific knowledge are highly concentrated in a few countries. A large majority of countries—those on the periphery, contribute precious little to the growth of scientific knowledge. Indeed, the distribution of science is even more skewed than is the distribution of wealth among nations. As a result, peripheral countries are left out of the intellectual discourse that is at the very foundation of the knowledge enterprise. The extent of this skewness and the relative neglect of the perihpery can be seen in some quantitative form from publication and citation data. However, while it may be true that mainstream science has not greatly benefitted from the efforts of the periphery, scientifically advanced societies are certainly benefitting from the traditional medical and agricultural knowledge base of the peripheral societies. Countless numbers of plants used in the traditional medical systems of India, China, Africa and Latin America are being drafted into the western system of medicine. A number of multinationals are learning from folk medicine and are gathering tons of plant material from these regions for the manufacture of modern medicine. Ironically, very little transfer of knowledge from ancient to modern systems takes place in the pheripheral countries themselves. Even when it does occur, it does not result in the manufacture and marketing of products for profit. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_150 |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
Science on the periphery: Can it contribute to mainstream science? |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02825969 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
324533993 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/BF02825969 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T00:55:03.928Z |
| _version_ |
1803607871512903680 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR024434620</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220111114640.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201006s1995 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/BF02825969</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR024434620</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)BF02825969-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">05.20</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">50.04</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">71.43</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Arunachalam, Subbiah</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Science on the periphery: Can it contribute to mainstream science?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1995</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Science is a global phenomenon that knows no frontiers. But in the real world, production and efficient utilization of scientific knowledge are highly concentrated in a few countries. A large majority of countries—those on the periphery, contribute precious little to the growth of scientific knowledge. Indeed, the distribution of science is even more skewed than is the distribution of wealth among nations. As a result, peripheral countries are left out of the intellectual discourse that is at the very foundation of the knowledge enterprise. The extent of this skewness and the relative neglect of the perihpery can be seen in some quantitative form from publication and citation data. However, while it may be true that mainstream science has not greatly benefitted from the efforts of the periphery, scientifically advanced societies are certainly benefitting from the traditional medical and agricultural knowledge base of the peripheral societies. Countless numbers of plants used in the traditional medical systems of India, China, Africa and Latin America are being drafted into the western system of medicine. A number of multinationals are learning from folk medicine and are gathering tons of plant material from these regions for the manufacture of modern medicine. Ironically, very little transfer of knowledge from ancient to modern systems takes place in the pheripheral countries themselves. Even when it does occur, it does not result in the manufacture and marketing of products for profit.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Journal Citation Report</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Peripheral Country</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Neem Extract</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Mainstream Science</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Secondary Service</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Knowledge, technology and policy</subfield><subfield code="d">Piscataway, NJ : Transaction Publ., 1998</subfield><subfield code="g">8(1995), 2 vom: Juni, Seite 68-87</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)324533993</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2028456-1</subfield><subfield code="x">1874-6314</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1995</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">month:06</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:68-87</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02825969</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">05.20</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">50.04</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">71.43</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">1995</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="c">06</subfield><subfield code="h">68-87</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3994217 |