The First and Second Echelon Sentinel Lymph Node Evaluation in Oral Cancer
Abstract Sentinel lymph node biopsy shows promise as a minimally invasive technique that samples the first echelon (station) of nodes to predict the need for more extensive neck dissection. This paper discusses the accuracy and feasibility of sentinel node and “station II node” biopsy for predicting...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Bassi, Kuldeep Kumar [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2012 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Anmerkung: |
© Association of Surgeons of India 2012 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Indian Journal of Surgery - Springer-Verlag, 2007, 75(2012), 5 vom: 02. Juni, Seite 377-382 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:75 ; year:2012 ; number:5 ; day:02 ; month:06 ; pages:377-382 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s12262-012-0497-5 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
SPR024604887 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | SPR024604887 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230403074426.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 201007s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s12262-012-0497-5 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)SPR024604887 | ||
035 | |a (SPR)s12262-012-0497-5-e | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Bassi, Kuldeep Kumar |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The First and Second Echelon Sentinel Lymph Node Evaluation in Oral Cancer |
264 | 1 | |c 2012 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © Association of Surgeons of India 2012 | ||
520 | |a Abstract Sentinel lymph node biopsy shows promise as a minimally invasive technique that samples the first echelon (station) of nodes to predict the need for more extensive neck dissection. This paper discusses the accuracy and feasibility of sentinel node and “station II node” biopsy for predicting the status of neck in 20 patients of oral cancer. We identified sentinel node in these patients. The next higher-order nodes, that is, second echelon of nodes known as “station II nodes” were delineated by further injecting 0.1 ml of isosulfan blue dye in sentinel lymph node. Identification rate for station I nodes was 95 %. Station II nodes were identified in 84 % of patients. One patient had false negative station I node. Station II node status was false negative in two patients. “Station I and station II concept” is feasible in early-stage tumors of oral cavity. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Sentinel node (station I node) |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Oral cancer |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Second echelon (station) node |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Neck dissection |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
700 | 1 | |a Srivastava, Anurag |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Seenu, Vuthaluru |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kumar, Rakesh |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Parshad, Rajinder |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Chumber, Sunil |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Gupta, Siddarth Datta |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Bahadur, Sudhir |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Indian Journal of Surgery |d Springer-Verlag, 2007 |g 75(2012), 5 vom: 02. Juni, Seite 377-382 |w (DE-627)SPR024596493 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:75 |g year:2012 |g number:5 |g day:02 |g month:06 |g pages:377-382 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12262-012-0497-5 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 75 |j 2012 |e 5 |b 02 |c 06 |h 377-382 |
author_variant |
k k b kk kkb a s as v s vs r k rk r p rp s c sc s d g sd sdg s b sb |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
bassikuldeepkumarsrivastavaanuragseenuvu:2012----:hfrtnscnehlnetnlypndea |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2012 |
publishDate |
2012 |
allfields |
10.1007/s12262-012-0497-5 doi (DE-627)SPR024604887 (SPR)s12262-012-0497-5-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Bassi, Kuldeep Kumar verfasserin aut The First and Second Echelon Sentinel Lymph Node Evaluation in Oral Cancer 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Association of Surgeons of India 2012 Abstract Sentinel lymph node biopsy shows promise as a minimally invasive technique that samples the first echelon (station) of nodes to predict the need for more extensive neck dissection. This paper discusses the accuracy and feasibility of sentinel node and “station II node” biopsy for predicting the status of neck in 20 patients of oral cancer. We identified sentinel node in these patients. The next higher-order nodes, that is, second echelon of nodes known as “station II nodes” were delineated by further injecting 0.1 ml of isosulfan blue dye in sentinel lymph node. Identification rate for station I nodes was 95 %. Station II nodes were identified in 84 % of patients. One patient had false negative station I node. Station II node status was false negative in two patients. “Station I and station II concept” is feasible in early-stage tumors of oral cavity. Sentinel node (station I node) (dpeaa)DE-He213 Oral cancer (dpeaa)DE-He213 Second echelon (station) node (dpeaa)DE-He213 Neck dissection (dpeaa)DE-He213 Srivastava, Anurag aut Seenu, Vuthaluru aut Kumar, Rakesh aut Parshad, Rajinder aut Chumber, Sunil aut Gupta, Siddarth Datta aut Bahadur, Sudhir aut Enthalten in Indian Journal of Surgery Springer-Verlag, 2007 75(2012), 5 vom: 02. Juni, Seite 377-382 (DE-627)SPR024596493 nnns volume:75 year:2012 number:5 day:02 month:06 pages:377-382 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12262-012-0497-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 75 2012 5 02 06 377-382 |
spelling |
10.1007/s12262-012-0497-5 doi (DE-627)SPR024604887 (SPR)s12262-012-0497-5-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Bassi, Kuldeep Kumar verfasserin aut The First and Second Echelon Sentinel Lymph Node Evaluation in Oral Cancer 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Association of Surgeons of India 2012 Abstract Sentinel lymph node biopsy shows promise as a minimally invasive technique that samples the first echelon (station) of nodes to predict the need for more extensive neck dissection. This paper discusses the accuracy and feasibility of sentinel node and “station II node” biopsy for predicting the status of neck in 20 patients of oral cancer. We identified sentinel node in these patients. The next higher-order nodes, that is, second echelon of nodes known as “station II nodes” were delineated by further injecting 0.1 ml of isosulfan blue dye in sentinel lymph node. Identification rate for station I nodes was 95 %. Station II nodes were identified in 84 % of patients. One patient had false negative station I node. Station II node status was false negative in two patients. “Station I and station II concept” is feasible in early-stage tumors of oral cavity. Sentinel node (station I node) (dpeaa)DE-He213 Oral cancer (dpeaa)DE-He213 Second echelon (station) node (dpeaa)DE-He213 Neck dissection (dpeaa)DE-He213 Srivastava, Anurag aut Seenu, Vuthaluru aut Kumar, Rakesh aut Parshad, Rajinder aut Chumber, Sunil aut Gupta, Siddarth Datta aut Bahadur, Sudhir aut Enthalten in Indian Journal of Surgery Springer-Verlag, 2007 75(2012), 5 vom: 02. Juni, Seite 377-382 (DE-627)SPR024596493 nnns volume:75 year:2012 number:5 day:02 month:06 pages:377-382 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12262-012-0497-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 75 2012 5 02 06 377-382 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s12262-012-0497-5 doi (DE-627)SPR024604887 (SPR)s12262-012-0497-5-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Bassi, Kuldeep Kumar verfasserin aut The First and Second Echelon Sentinel Lymph Node Evaluation in Oral Cancer 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Association of Surgeons of India 2012 Abstract Sentinel lymph node biopsy shows promise as a minimally invasive technique that samples the first echelon (station) of nodes to predict the need for more extensive neck dissection. This paper discusses the accuracy and feasibility of sentinel node and “station II node” biopsy for predicting the status of neck in 20 patients of oral cancer. We identified sentinel node in these patients. The next higher-order nodes, that is, second echelon of nodes known as “station II nodes” were delineated by further injecting 0.1 ml of isosulfan blue dye in sentinel lymph node. Identification rate for station I nodes was 95 %. Station II nodes were identified in 84 % of patients. One patient had false negative station I node. Station II node status was false negative in two patients. “Station I and station II concept” is feasible in early-stage tumors of oral cavity. Sentinel node (station I node) (dpeaa)DE-He213 Oral cancer (dpeaa)DE-He213 Second echelon (station) node (dpeaa)DE-He213 Neck dissection (dpeaa)DE-He213 Srivastava, Anurag aut Seenu, Vuthaluru aut Kumar, Rakesh aut Parshad, Rajinder aut Chumber, Sunil aut Gupta, Siddarth Datta aut Bahadur, Sudhir aut Enthalten in Indian Journal of Surgery Springer-Verlag, 2007 75(2012), 5 vom: 02. Juni, Seite 377-382 (DE-627)SPR024596493 nnns volume:75 year:2012 number:5 day:02 month:06 pages:377-382 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12262-012-0497-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 75 2012 5 02 06 377-382 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s12262-012-0497-5 doi (DE-627)SPR024604887 (SPR)s12262-012-0497-5-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Bassi, Kuldeep Kumar verfasserin aut The First and Second Echelon Sentinel Lymph Node Evaluation in Oral Cancer 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Association of Surgeons of India 2012 Abstract Sentinel lymph node biopsy shows promise as a minimally invasive technique that samples the first echelon (station) of nodes to predict the need for more extensive neck dissection. This paper discusses the accuracy and feasibility of sentinel node and “station II node” biopsy for predicting the status of neck in 20 patients of oral cancer. We identified sentinel node in these patients. The next higher-order nodes, that is, second echelon of nodes known as “station II nodes” were delineated by further injecting 0.1 ml of isosulfan blue dye in sentinel lymph node. Identification rate for station I nodes was 95 %. Station II nodes were identified in 84 % of patients. One patient had false negative station I node. Station II node status was false negative in two patients. “Station I and station II concept” is feasible in early-stage tumors of oral cavity. Sentinel node (station I node) (dpeaa)DE-He213 Oral cancer (dpeaa)DE-He213 Second echelon (station) node (dpeaa)DE-He213 Neck dissection (dpeaa)DE-He213 Srivastava, Anurag aut Seenu, Vuthaluru aut Kumar, Rakesh aut Parshad, Rajinder aut Chumber, Sunil aut Gupta, Siddarth Datta aut Bahadur, Sudhir aut Enthalten in Indian Journal of Surgery Springer-Verlag, 2007 75(2012), 5 vom: 02. Juni, Seite 377-382 (DE-627)SPR024596493 nnns volume:75 year:2012 number:5 day:02 month:06 pages:377-382 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12262-012-0497-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 75 2012 5 02 06 377-382 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s12262-012-0497-5 doi (DE-627)SPR024604887 (SPR)s12262-012-0497-5-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Bassi, Kuldeep Kumar verfasserin aut The First and Second Echelon Sentinel Lymph Node Evaluation in Oral Cancer 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Association of Surgeons of India 2012 Abstract Sentinel lymph node biopsy shows promise as a minimally invasive technique that samples the first echelon (station) of nodes to predict the need for more extensive neck dissection. This paper discusses the accuracy and feasibility of sentinel node and “station II node” biopsy for predicting the status of neck in 20 patients of oral cancer. We identified sentinel node in these patients. The next higher-order nodes, that is, second echelon of nodes known as “station II nodes” were delineated by further injecting 0.1 ml of isosulfan blue dye in sentinel lymph node. Identification rate for station I nodes was 95 %. Station II nodes were identified in 84 % of patients. One patient had false negative station I node. Station II node status was false negative in two patients. “Station I and station II concept” is feasible in early-stage tumors of oral cavity. Sentinel node (station I node) (dpeaa)DE-He213 Oral cancer (dpeaa)DE-He213 Second echelon (station) node (dpeaa)DE-He213 Neck dissection (dpeaa)DE-He213 Srivastava, Anurag aut Seenu, Vuthaluru aut Kumar, Rakesh aut Parshad, Rajinder aut Chumber, Sunil aut Gupta, Siddarth Datta aut Bahadur, Sudhir aut Enthalten in Indian Journal of Surgery Springer-Verlag, 2007 75(2012), 5 vom: 02. Juni, Seite 377-382 (DE-627)SPR024596493 nnns volume:75 year:2012 number:5 day:02 month:06 pages:377-382 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12262-012-0497-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 75 2012 5 02 06 377-382 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Indian Journal of Surgery 75(2012), 5 vom: 02. Juni, Seite 377-382 volume:75 year:2012 number:5 day:02 month:06 pages:377-382 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Indian Journal of Surgery 75(2012), 5 vom: 02. Juni, Seite 377-382 volume:75 year:2012 number:5 day:02 month:06 pages:377-382 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Sentinel node (station I node) Oral cancer Second echelon (station) node Neck dissection |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Indian Journal of Surgery |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Bassi, Kuldeep Kumar @@aut@@ Srivastava, Anurag @@aut@@ Seenu, Vuthaluru @@aut@@ Kumar, Rakesh @@aut@@ Parshad, Rajinder @@aut@@ Chumber, Sunil @@aut@@ Gupta, Siddarth Datta @@aut@@ Bahadur, Sudhir @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2012-06-02T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
SPR024596493 |
id |
SPR024604887 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR024604887</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230403074426.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s12262-012-0497-5</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR024604887</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s12262-012-0497-5-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bassi, Kuldeep Kumar</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The First and Second Echelon Sentinel Lymph Node Evaluation in Oral Cancer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Association of Surgeons of India 2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Sentinel lymph node biopsy shows promise as a minimally invasive technique that samples the first echelon (station) of nodes to predict the need for more extensive neck dissection. This paper discusses the accuracy and feasibility of sentinel node and “station II node” biopsy for predicting the status of neck in 20 patients of oral cancer. We identified sentinel node in these patients. The next higher-order nodes, that is, second echelon of nodes known as “station II nodes” were delineated by further injecting 0.1 ml of isosulfan blue dye in sentinel lymph node. Identification rate for station I nodes was 95 %. Station II nodes were identified in 84 % of patients. One patient had false negative station I node. Station II node status was false negative in two patients. “Station I and station II concept” is feasible in early-stage tumors of oral cavity.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sentinel node (station I node)</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Oral cancer</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Second echelon (station) node</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Neck dissection</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Srivastava, Anurag</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Seenu, Vuthaluru</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kumar, Rakesh</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Parshad, Rajinder</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chumber, Sunil</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gupta, Siddarth Datta</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bahadur, Sudhir</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Indian Journal of Surgery</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 2007</subfield><subfield code="g">75(2012), 5 vom: 02. Juni, Seite 377-382</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR024596493</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:75</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2012</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">day:02</subfield><subfield code="g">month:06</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:377-382</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12262-012-0497-5</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">75</subfield><subfield code="j">2012</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="b">02</subfield><subfield code="c">06</subfield><subfield code="h">377-382</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Bassi, Kuldeep Kumar |
spellingShingle |
Bassi, Kuldeep Kumar misc Sentinel node (station I node) misc Oral cancer misc Second echelon (station) node misc Neck dissection The First and Second Echelon Sentinel Lymph Node Evaluation in Oral Cancer |
authorStr |
Bassi, Kuldeep Kumar |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)SPR024596493 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
springer |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
topic_title |
The First and Second Echelon Sentinel Lymph Node Evaluation in Oral Cancer Sentinel node (station I node) (dpeaa)DE-He213 Oral cancer (dpeaa)DE-He213 Second echelon (station) node (dpeaa)DE-He213 Neck dissection (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
topic |
misc Sentinel node (station I node) misc Oral cancer misc Second echelon (station) node misc Neck dissection |
topic_unstemmed |
misc Sentinel node (station I node) misc Oral cancer misc Second echelon (station) node misc Neck dissection |
topic_browse |
misc Sentinel node (station I node) misc Oral cancer misc Second echelon (station) node misc Neck dissection |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Indian Journal of Surgery |
hierarchy_parent_id |
SPR024596493 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Indian Journal of Surgery |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)SPR024596493 |
title |
The First and Second Echelon Sentinel Lymph Node Evaluation in Oral Cancer |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR024604887 (SPR)s12262-012-0497-5-e |
title_full |
The First and Second Echelon Sentinel Lymph Node Evaluation in Oral Cancer |
author_sort |
Bassi, Kuldeep Kumar |
journal |
Indian Journal of Surgery |
journalStr |
Indian Journal of Surgery |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2012 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
377 |
author_browse |
Bassi, Kuldeep Kumar Srivastava, Anurag Seenu, Vuthaluru Kumar, Rakesh Parshad, Rajinder Chumber, Sunil Gupta, Siddarth Datta Bahadur, Sudhir |
container_volume |
75 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Bassi, Kuldeep Kumar |
doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s12262-012-0497-5 |
title_sort |
first and second echelon sentinel lymph node evaluation in oral cancer |
title_auth |
The First and Second Echelon Sentinel Lymph Node Evaluation in Oral Cancer |
abstract |
Abstract Sentinel lymph node biopsy shows promise as a minimally invasive technique that samples the first echelon (station) of nodes to predict the need for more extensive neck dissection. This paper discusses the accuracy and feasibility of sentinel node and “station II node” biopsy for predicting the status of neck in 20 patients of oral cancer. We identified sentinel node in these patients. The next higher-order nodes, that is, second echelon of nodes known as “station II nodes” were delineated by further injecting 0.1 ml of isosulfan blue dye in sentinel lymph node. Identification rate for station I nodes was 95 %. Station II nodes were identified in 84 % of patients. One patient had false negative station I node. Station II node status was false negative in two patients. “Station I and station II concept” is feasible in early-stage tumors of oral cavity. © Association of Surgeons of India 2012 |
abstractGer |
Abstract Sentinel lymph node biopsy shows promise as a minimally invasive technique that samples the first echelon (station) of nodes to predict the need for more extensive neck dissection. This paper discusses the accuracy and feasibility of sentinel node and “station II node” biopsy for predicting the status of neck in 20 patients of oral cancer. We identified sentinel node in these patients. The next higher-order nodes, that is, second echelon of nodes known as “station II nodes” were delineated by further injecting 0.1 ml of isosulfan blue dye in sentinel lymph node. Identification rate for station I nodes was 95 %. Station II nodes were identified in 84 % of patients. One patient had false negative station I node. Station II node status was false negative in two patients. “Station I and station II concept” is feasible in early-stage tumors of oral cavity. © Association of Surgeons of India 2012 |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Sentinel lymph node biopsy shows promise as a minimally invasive technique that samples the first echelon (station) of nodes to predict the need for more extensive neck dissection. This paper discusses the accuracy and feasibility of sentinel node and “station II node” biopsy for predicting the status of neck in 20 patients of oral cancer. We identified sentinel node in these patients. The next higher-order nodes, that is, second echelon of nodes known as “station II nodes” were delineated by further injecting 0.1 ml of isosulfan blue dye in sentinel lymph node. Identification rate for station I nodes was 95 %. Station II nodes were identified in 84 % of patients. One patient had false negative station I node. Station II node status was false negative in two patients. “Station I and station II concept” is feasible in early-stage tumors of oral cavity. © Association of Surgeons of India 2012 |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER |
container_issue |
5 |
title_short |
The First and Second Echelon Sentinel Lymph Node Evaluation in Oral Cancer |
url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12262-012-0497-5 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Srivastava, Anurag Seenu, Vuthaluru Kumar, Rakesh Parshad, Rajinder Chumber, Sunil Gupta, Siddarth Datta Bahadur, Sudhir |
author2Str |
Srivastava, Anurag Seenu, Vuthaluru Kumar, Rakesh Parshad, Rajinder Chumber, Sunil Gupta, Siddarth Datta Bahadur, Sudhir |
ppnlink |
SPR024596493 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1007/s12262-012-0497-5 |
up_date |
2024-07-04T01:37:53.820Z |
_version_ |
1803610566241026048 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR024604887</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230403074426.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s12262-012-0497-5</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR024604887</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s12262-012-0497-5-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bassi, Kuldeep Kumar</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The First and Second Echelon Sentinel Lymph Node Evaluation in Oral Cancer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Association of Surgeons of India 2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Sentinel lymph node biopsy shows promise as a minimally invasive technique that samples the first echelon (station) of nodes to predict the need for more extensive neck dissection. This paper discusses the accuracy and feasibility of sentinel node and “station II node” biopsy for predicting the status of neck in 20 patients of oral cancer. We identified sentinel node in these patients. The next higher-order nodes, that is, second echelon of nodes known as “station II nodes” were delineated by further injecting 0.1 ml of isosulfan blue dye in sentinel lymph node. Identification rate for station I nodes was 95 %. Station II nodes were identified in 84 % of patients. One patient had false negative station I node. Station II node status was false negative in two patients. “Station I and station II concept” is feasible in early-stage tumors of oral cavity.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sentinel node (station I node)</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Oral cancer</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Second echelon (station) node</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Neck dissection</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Srivastava, Anurag</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Seenu, Vuthaluru</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kumar, Rakesh</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Parshad, Rajinder</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chumber, Sunil</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gupta, Siddarth Datta</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bahadur, Sudhir</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Indian Journal of Surgery</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 2007</subfield><subfield code="g">75(2012), 5 vom: 02. Juni, Seite 377-382</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR024596493</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:75</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2012</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">day:02</subfield><subfield code="g">month:06</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:377-382</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12262-012-0497-5</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">75</subfield><subfield code="j">2012</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="b">02</subfield><subfield code="c">06</subfield><subfield code="h">377-382</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.401332 |