Oral pH in gastroesophageal reflux disease
Aims and Objectives The aim of this study is to compare surface pH in various parts of the oral cavity between patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and healthy controls. Methods Using a flat pH meter sensor, fixed electrode pen type digital pH meter, oral pH levels were assessed at d...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Sujatha, S. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2016 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Indian Society of Gastroenterology 2016 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Indian Journal of Gastroenterology - Springer-Verlag, 2009, 35(2016), 3 vom: Mai, Seite 186-189 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:35 ; year:2016 ; number:3 ; month:05 ; pages:186-189 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s12664-016-0659-7 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR026659700 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR026659700 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230519190202.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201007s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s12664-016-0659-7 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR026659700 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)s12664-016-0659-7-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Sujatha, S. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Oral pH in gastroesophageal reflux disease |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Indian Society of Gastroenterology 2016 | ||
| 520 | |a Aims and Objectives The aim of this study is to compare surface pH in various parts of the oral cavity between patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and healthy controls. Methods Using a flat pH meter sensor, fixed electrode pen type digital pH meter, oral pH levels were assessed at different mucosal sites among 34 GERD patients and 32 healthy controls. Salivary flow rates and buffering capacity were also assessed in them. A thorough oral examination was performed to screen for any oral and dental changes. Result A significantly lower pH of 6.65 ± 0.13 (mean ± SD) was found in the GERD group compared to control group 7.23 ± 0.12 (p < 0.05). Least pH was found in the floor of the mouth 6.594 ± 0.17 and highest in the lower labial mucosa among the GERD patients. Salivary flow rate and buffering capacity were low in these patients. Significant changes were noticed in the hard and soft tissues of the oral cavity among the GERD group. Conclusion Oral mucosal pH is altered in GERD patients and may contribute to effects on the oral cavity. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Buffering capacity |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a GERD |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Oral pH |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Salivary flow rate |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jalihal, Umesh |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Devi, Yashoda |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rakesh, N. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chauhan, Pallavi |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sharma, Shivani |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Indian Journal of Gastroenterology |d Springer-Verlag, 2009 |g 35(2016), 3 vom: Mai, Seite 186-189 |w (DE-627)SPR02665167X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:35 |g year:2016 |g number:3 |g month:05 |g pages:186-189 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12664-016-0659-7 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 35 |j 2016 |e 3 |c 05 |h 186-189 | ||
| author_variant |
s s ss u j uj y d yd n r nr p c pc s s ss |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
sujathasjalihalumeshdeviyashodarakeshnch:2016----:rlhnatospaele |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2016 |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s12664-016-0659-7 doi (DE-627)SPR026659700 (SPR)s12664-016-0659-7-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Sujatha, S. verfasserin aut Oral pH in gastroesophageal reflux disease 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Indian Society of Gastroenterology 2016 Aims and Objectives The aim of this study is to compare surface pH in various parts of the oral cavity between patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and healthy controls. Methods Using a flat pH meter sensor, fixed electrode pen type digital pH meter, oral pH levels were assessed at different mucosal sites among 34 GERD patients and 32 healthy controls. Salivary flow rates and buffering capacity were also assessed in them. A thorough oral examination was performed to screen for any oral and dental changes. Result A significantly lower pH of 6.65 ± 0.13 (mean ± SD) was found in the GERD group compared to control group 7.23 ± 0.12 (p < 0.05). Least pH was found in the floor of the mouth 6.594 ± 0.17 and highest in the lower labial mucosa among the GERD patients. Salivary flow rate and buffering capacity were low in these patients. Significant changes were noticed in the hard and soft tissues of the oral cavity among the GERD group. Conclusion Oral mucosal pH is altered in GERD patients and may contribute to effects on the oral cavity. Buffering capacity (dpeaa)DE-He213 GERD (dpeaa)DE-He213 Oral pH (dpeaa)DE-He213 Salivary flow rate (dpeaa)DE-He213 Jalihal, Umesh aut Devi, Yashoda aut Rakesh, N. aut Chauhan, Pallavi aut Sharma, Shivani aut Enthalten in Indian Journal of Gastroenterology Springer-Verlag, 2009 35(2016), 3 vom: Mai, Seite 186-189 (DE-627)SPR02665167X nnns volume:35 year:2016 number:3 month:05 pages:186-189 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12664-016-0659-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA AR 35 2016 3 05 186-189 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s12664-016-0659-7 doi (DE-627)SPR026659700 (SPR)s12664-016-0659-7-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Sujatha, S. verfasserin aut Oral pH in gastroesophageal reflux disease 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Indian Society of Gastroenterology 2016 Aims and Objectives The aim of this study is to compare surface pH in various parts of the oral cavity between patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and healthy controls. Methods Using a flat pH meter sensor, fixed electrode pen type digital pH meter, oral pH levels were assessed at different mucosal sites among 34 GERD patients and 32 healthy controls. Salivary flow rates and buffering capacity were also assessed in them. A thorough oral examination was performed to screen for any oral and dental changes. Result A significantly lower pH of 6.65 ± 0.13 (mean ± SD) was found in the GERD group compared to control group 7.23 ± 0.12 (p < 0.05). Least pH was found in the floor of the mouth 6.594 ± 0.17 and highest in the lower labial mucosa among the GERD patients. Salivary flow rate and buffering capacity were low in these patients. Significant changes were noticed in the hard and soft tissues of the oral cavity among the GERD group. Conclusion Oral mucosal pH is altered in GERD patients and may contribute to effects on the oral cavity. Buffering capacity (dpeaa)DE-He213 GERD (dpeaa)DE-He213 Oral pH (dpeaa)DE-He213 Salivary flow rate (dpeaa)DE-He213 Jalihal, Umesh aut Devi, Yashoda aut Rakesh, N. aut Chauhan, Pallavi aut Sharma, Shivani aut Enthalten in Indian Journal of Gastroenterology Springer-Verlag, 2009 35(2016), 3 vom: Mai, Seite 186-189 (DE-627)SPR02665167X nnns volume:35 year:2016 number:3 month:05 pages:186-189 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12664-016-0659-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA AR 35 2016 3 05 186-189 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s12664-016-0659-7 doi (DE-627)SPR026659700 (SPR)s12664-016-0659-7-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Sujatha, S. verfasserin aut Oral pH in gastroesophageal reflux disease 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Indian Society of Gastroenterology 2016 Aims and Objectives The aim of this study is to compare surface pH in various parts of the oral cavity between patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and healthy controls. Methods Using a flat pH meter sensor, fixed electrode pen type digital pH meter, oral pH levels were assessed at different mucosal sites among 34 GERD patients and 32 healthy controls. Salivary flow rates and buffering capacity were also assessed in them. A thorough oral examination was performed to screen for any oral and dental changes. Result A significantly lower pH of 6.65 ± 0.13 (mean ± SD) was found in the GERD group compared to control group 7.23 ± 0.12 (p < 0.05). Least pH was found in the floor of the mouth 6.594 ± 0.17 and highest in the lower labial mucosa among the GERD patients. Salivary flow rate and buffering capacity were low in these patients. Significant changes were noticed in the hard and soft tissues of the oral cavity among the GERD group. Conclusion Oral mucosal pH is altered in GERD patients and may contribute to effects on the oral cavity. Buffering capacity (dpeaa)DE-He213 GERD (dpeaa)DE-He213 Oral pH (dpeaa)DE-He213 Salivary flow rate (dpeaa)DE-He213 Jalihal, Umesh aut Devi, Yashoda aut Rakesh, N. aut Chauhan, Pallavi aut Sharma, Shivani aut Enthalten in Indian Journal of Gastroenterology Springer-Verlag, 2009 35(2016), 3 vom: Mai, Seite 186-189 (DE-627)SPR02665167X nnns volume:35 year:2016 number:3 month:05 pages:186-189 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12664-016-0659-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA AR 35 2016 3 05 186-189 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s12664-016-0659-7 doi (DE-627)SPR026659700 (SPR)s12664-016-0659-7-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Sujatha, S. verfasserin aut Oral pH in gastroesophageal reflux disease 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Indian Society of Gastroenterology 2016 Aims and Objectives The aim of this study is to compare surface pH in various parts of the oral cavity between patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and healthy controls. Methods Using a flat pH meter sensor, fixed electrode pen type digital pH meter, oral pH levels were assessed at different mucosal sites among 34 GERD patients and 32 healthy controls. Salivary flow rates and buffering capacity were also assessed in them. A thorough oral examination was performed to screen for any oral and dental changes. Result A significantly lower pH of 6.65 ± 0.13 (mean ± SD) was found in the GERD group compared to control group 7.23 ± 0.12 (p < 0.05). Least pH was found in the floor of the mouth 6.594 ± 0.17 and highest in the lower labial mucosa among the GERD patients. Salivary flow rate and buffering capacity were low in these patients. Significant changes were noticed in the hard and soft tissues of the oral cavity among the GERD group. Conclusion Oral mucosal pH is altered in GERD patients and may contribute to effects on the oral cavity. Buffering capacity (dpeaa)DE-He213 GERD (dpeaa)DE-He213 Oral pH (dpeaa)DE-He213 Salivary flow rate (dpeaa)DE-He213 Jalihal, Umesh aut Devi, Yashoda aut Rakesh, N. aut Chauhan, Pallavi aut Sharma, Shivani aut Enthalten in Indian Journal of Gastroenterology Springer-Verlag, 2009 35(2016), 3 vom: Mai, Seite 186-189 (DE-627)SPR02665167X nnns volume:35 year:2016 number:3 month:05 pages:186-189 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12664-016-0659-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA AR 35 2016 3 05 186-189 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s12664-016-0659-7 doi (DE-627)SPR026659700 (SPR)s12664-016-0659-7-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Sujatha, S. verfasserin aut Oral pH in gastroesophageal reflux disease 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Indian Society of Gastroenterology 2016 Aims and Objectives The aim of this study is to compare surface pH in various parts of the oral cavity between patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and healthy controls. Methods Using a flat pH meter sensor, fixed electrode pen type digital pH meter, oral pH levels were assessed at different mucosal sites among 34 GERD patients and 32 healthy controls. Salivary flow rates and buffering capacity were also assessed in them. A thorough oral examination was performed to screen for any oral and dental changes. Result A significantly lower pH of 6.65 ± 0.13 (mean ± SD) was found in the GERD group compared to control group 7.23 ± 0.12 (p < 0.05). Least pH was found in the floor of the mouth 6.594 ± 0.17 and highest in the lower labial mucosa among the GERD patients. Salivary flow rate and buffering capacity were low in these patients. Significant changes were noticed in the hard and soft tissues of the oral cavity among the GERD group. Conclusion Oral mucosal pH is altered in GERD patients and may contribute to effects on the oral cavity. Buffering capacity (dpeaa)DE-He213 GERD (dpeaa)DE-He213 Oral pH (dpeaa)DE-He213 Salivary flow rate (dpeaa)DE-He213 Jalihal, Umesh aut Devi, Yashoda aut Rakesh, N. aut Chauhan, Pallavi aut Sharma, Shivani aut Enthalten in Indian Journal of Gastroenterology Springer-Verlag, 2009 35(2016), 3 vom: Mai, Seite 186-189 (DE-627)SPR02665167X nnns volume:35 year:2016 number:3 month:05 pages:186-189 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12664-016-0659-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA AR 35 2016 3 05 186-189 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Indian Journal of Gastroenterology 35(2016), 3 vom: Mai, Seite 186-189 volume:35 year:2016 number:3 month:05 pages:186-189 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Indian Journal of Gastroenterology 35(2016), 3 vom: Mai, Seite 186-189 volume:35 year:2016 number:3 month:05 pages:186-189 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Buffering capacity GERD Oral pH Salivary flow rate |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Sujatha, S. @@aut@@ Jalihal, Umesh @@aut@@ Devi, Yashoda @@aut@@ Rakesh, N. @@aut@@ Chauhan, Pallavi @@aut@@ Sharma, Shivani @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-05-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
SPR02665167X |
| id |
SPR026659700 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR026659700</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519190202.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s12664-016-0659-7</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR026659700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s12664-016-0659-7-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sujatha, S.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Oral pH in gastroesophageal reflux disease</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Indian Society of Gastroenterology 2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aims and Objectives The aim of this study is to compare surface pH in various parts of the oral cavity between patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and healthy controls. Methods Using a flat pH meter sensor, fixed electrode pen type digital pH meter, oral pH levels were assessed at different mucosal sites among 34 GERD patients and 32 healthy controls. Salivary flow rates and buffering capacity were also assessed in them. A thorough oral examination was performed to screen for any oral and dental changes. Result A significantly lower pH of 6.65 ± 0.13 (mean ± SD) was found in the GERD group compared to control group 7.23 ± 0.12 (p < 0.05). Least pH was found in the floor of the mouth 6.594 ± 0.17 and highest in the lower labial mucosa among the GERD patients. Salivary flow rate and buffering capacity were low in these patients. Significant changes were noticed in the hard and soft tissues of the oral cavity among the GERD group. Conclusion Oral mucosal pH is altered in GERD patients and may contribute to effects on the oral cavity.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Buffering capacity</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">GERD</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Oral pH</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Salivary flow rate</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jalihal, Umesh</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Devi, Yashoda</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rakesh, N.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chauhan, Pallavi</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sharma, Shivani</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Indian Journal of Gastroenterology</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">35(2016), 3 vom: Mai, Seite 186-189</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR02665167X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:35</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:186-189</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12664-016-0659-7</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">35</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">186-189</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Sujatha, S. |
| spellingShingle |
Sujatha, S. misc Buffering capacity misc GERD misc Oral pH misc Salivary flow rate Oral pH in gastroesophageal reflux disease |
| authorStr |
Sujatha, S. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)SPR02665167X |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
Oral pH in gastroesophageal reflux disease Buffering capacity (dpeaa)DE-He213 GERD (dpeaa)DE-He213 Oral pH (dpeaa)DE-He213 Salivary flow rate (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
misc Buffering capacity misc GERD misc Oral pH misc Salivary flow rate |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Buffering capacity misc GERD misc Oral pH misc Salivary flow rate |
| topic_browse |
misc Buffering capacity misc GERD misc Oral pH misc Salivary flow rate |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
SPR02665167X |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)SPR02665167X |
| title |
Oral pH in gastroesophageal reflux disease |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR026659700 (SPR)s12664-016-0659-7-e |
| title_full |
Oral pH in gastroesophageal reflux disease |
| author_sort |
Sujatha, S. |
| journal |
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology |
| journalStr |
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2016 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
186 |
| author_browse |
Sujatha, S. Jalihal, Umesh Devi, Yashoda Rakesh, N. Chauhan, Pallavi Sharma, Shivani |
| container_volume |
35 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Sujatha, S. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s12664-016-0659-7 |
| title_sort |
oral ph in gastroesophageal reflux disease |
| title_auth |
Oral pH in gastroesophageal reflux disease |
| abstract |
Aims and Objectives The aim of this study is to compare surface pH in various parts of the oral cavity between patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and healthy controls. Methods Using a flat pH meter sensor, fixed electrode pen type digital pH meter, oral pH levels were assessed at different mucosal sites among 34 GERD patients and 32 healthy controls. Salivary flow rates and buffering capacity were also assessed in them. A thorough oral examination was performed to screen for any oral and dental changes. Result A significantly lower pH of 6.65 ± 0.13 (mean ± SD) was found in the GERD group compared to control group 7.23 ± 0.12 (p < 0.05). Least pH was found in the floor of the mouth 6.594 ± 0.17 and highest in the lower labial mucosa among the GERD patients. Salivary flow rate and buffering capacity were low in these patients. Significant changes were noticed in the hard and soft tissues of the oral cavity among the GERD group. Conclusion Oral mucosal pH is altered in GERD patients and may contribute to effects on the oral cavity. © Indian Society of Gastroenterology 2016 |
| abstractGer |
Aims and Objectives The aim of this study is to compare surface pH in various parts of the oral cavity between patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and healthy controls. Methods Using a flat pH meter sensor, fixed electrode pen type digital pH meter, oral pH levels were assessed at different mucosal sites among 34 GERD patients and 32 healthy controls. Salivary flow rates and buffering capacity were also assessed in them. A thorough oral examination was performed to screen for any oral and dental changes. Result A significantly lower pH of 6.65 ± 0.13 (mean ± SD) was found in the GERD group compared to control group 7.23 ± 0.12 (p < 0.05). Least pH was found in the floor of the mouth 6.594 ± 0.17 and highest in the lower labial mucosa among the GERD patients. Salivary flow rate and buffering capacity were low in these patients. Significant changes were noticed in the hard and soft tissues of the oral cavity among the GERD group. Conclusion Oral mucosal pH is altered in GERD patients and may contribute to effects on the oral cavity. © Indian Society of Gastroenterology 2016 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Aims and Objectives The aim of this study is to compare surface pH in various parts of the oral cavity between patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and healthy controls. Methods Using a flat pH meter sensor, fixed electrode pen type digital pH meter, oral pH levels were assessed at different mucosal sites among 34 GERD patients and 32 healthy controls. Salivary flow rates and buffering capacity were also assessed in them. A thorough oral examination was performed to screen for any oral and dental changes. Result A significantly lower pH of 6.65 ± 0.13 (mean ± SD) was found in the GERD group compared to control group 7.23 ± 0.12 (p < 0.05). Least pH was found in the floor of the mouth 6.594 ± 0.17 and highest in the lower labial mucosa among the GERD patients. Salivary flow rate and buffering capacity were low in these patients. Significant changes were noticed in the hard and soft tissues of the oral cavity among the GERD group. Conclusion Oral mucosal pH is altered in GERD patients and may contribute to effects on the oral cavity. © Indian Society of Gastroenterology 2016 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA |
| container_issue |
3 |
| title_short |
Oral pH in gastroesophageal reflux disease |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12664-016-0659-7 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Jalihal, Umesh Devi, Yashoda Rakesh, N. Chauhan, Pallavi Sharma, Shivani |
| author2Str |
Jalihal, Umesh Devi, Yashoda Rakesh, N. Chauhan, Pallavi Sharma, Shivani |
| ppnlink |
SPR02665167X |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s12664-016-0659-7 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T21:59:32.235Z |
| _version_ |
1803596828237627392 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR026659700</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519190202.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s12664-016-0659-7</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR026659700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s12664-016-0659-7-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sujatha, S.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Oral pH in gastroesophageal reflux disease</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Indian Society of Gastroenterology 2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aims and Objectives The aim of this study is to compare surface pH in various parts of the oral cavity between patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and healthy controls. Methods Using a flat pH meter sensor, fixed electrode pen type digital pH meter, oral pH levels were assessed at different mucosal sites among 34 GERD patients and 32 healthy controls. Salivary flow rates and buffering capacity were also assessed in them. A thorough oral examination was performed to screen for any oral and dental changes. Result A significantly lower pH of 6.65 ± 0.13 (mean ± SD) was found in the GERD group compared to control group 7.23 ± 0.12 (p < 0.05). Least pH was found in the floor of the mouth 6.594 ± 0.17 and highest in the lower labial mucosa among the GERD patients. Salivary flow rate and buffering capacity were low in these patients. Significant changes were noticed in the hard and soft tissues of the oral cavity among the GERD group. Conclusion Oral mucosal pH is altered in GERD patients and may contribute to effects on the oral cavity.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Buffering capacity</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">GERD</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Oral pH</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Salivary flow rate</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jalihal, Umesh</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Devi, Yashoda</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rakesh, N.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chauhan, Pallavi</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sharma, Shivani</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Indian Journal of Gastroenterology</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">35(2016), 3 vom: Mai, Seite 186-189</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR02665167X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:35</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:186-189</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12664-016-0659-7</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">35</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">186-189</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399987 |