High acceptability of a newly developed urological practical skills training program

Background Benefits of simulation training are widely recognized, but its structural implementation into urological curricula remains challenging. This study aims to gain insight into current and ideal urological practical skills training and presents the outline of a newly developed skills training...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	de Vries, Anna H. [verfasserIn] van Luijk, Scheltus J. Scherpbier, Albert J. J. A. Hendrikx, Ad J. M. Koldewijn, Evert L. Wagner, Cordula Schout, Barbara M. A.

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2015

Schlagwörter:	Program Director Skill Training Practical Skill Fidelity Model Skill Training Program

Anmerkung:	© de Vries et al. 2015

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: BMC urology - London : BioMed Central, 2001, 15(2015), 1 vom: 04. Sept.
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:15 ; year:2015 ; number:1 ; day:04 ; month:09

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.1186/s12894-015-0084-8

Katalog-ID:	SPR028236890

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	SPR028236890
003	DE-627
005	20230519232222.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	201007s2015 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1186/s12894-015-0084-8 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)SPR028236890
035			\|a (SPR)s12894-015-0084-8-e
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
100	1		\|a de Vries, Anna H. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a High acceptability of a newly developed urological practical skills training program
264		1	\|c 2015
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
500			\|a © de Vries et al. 2015
520			\|a Background Benefits of simulation training are widely recognized, but its structural implementation into urological curricula remains challenging. This study aims to gain insight into current and ideal urological practical skills training and presents the outline of a newly developed skills training program, including an assessment of the design characteristics that may increase its acceptability. Methods A questionnaire was sent to the urology residents (n = 87) and program directors (n = 45) of all Dutch teaching hospitals. Open- and close-ended questions were used to determine the views on current and ideal skills training and the newly developed skills training program. Eight semi-structured interviews were conducted with 39 residents and 15 program directors. All interviews were audiotaped, fully transcribed, and thereafter analyzed. Results Response was 87.4 % for residents and 86.7 % for program directors. Residents appeared to be still predominantly trained ‘by doing’. Structured practical skills training in local hospitals takes place according to 12 % of the residents versus 44 % of the program directors (p < 0.001). Ideally, residents prefer to practice certain procedures on simulation models first, especially in endourology. The majority of residents (92 %) and program directors (87 %) approved of implementing the newly developed skills training program (p = 0.51). ‘Structured scheduling’, ‘use of peer teaching’ and ‘high fidelity models’ were indicated as design characteristics that increase its acceptability. Conclusions Current urological residency training consists of patient-related ‘learning by doing’, although more practice on simulation models is desired. The acceptability of implementing the presented skills-training program is high. Design characteristics that increase its acceptability are structured scheduling, the use of peer teaching and high fidelity models.
650		4	\|a Program Director \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Skill Training \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Practical Skill \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Fidelity Model \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Skill Training Program \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
700	1		\|a van Luijk, Scheltus J. \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Scherpbier, Albert J. J. A. \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Hendrikx, Ad J. M. \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Koldewijn, Evert L. \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Wagner, Cordula \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Schout, Barbara M. A. \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t BMC urology \|d London : BioMed Central, 2001 \|g 15(2015), 1 vom: 04. Sept. \|w (DE-627)335488811 \|w (DE-600)2059857-9 \|x 1471-2490 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:15 \|g year:2015 \|g number:1 \|g day:04 \|g month:09
856	4	0	\|u https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-015-0084-8 \|z kostenfrei \|3 Volltext
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_SPRINGER
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHA
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 15 \|j 2015 \|e 1 \|b 04 \|c 09

Indexfelder

author_variant	v a h d vah vahd l s j v lsj lsjv a j j a s ajja ajjas a j m h ajm ajmh e l k el elk c w cw b m a s bma bmas
matchkey_str	article:14712490:2015----::ihcetbltoaeldvlpdrlgclrcias
hierarchy_sort_str	2015
publishDate	2015
allfields	10.1186/s12894-015-0084-8 doi (DE-627)SPR028236890 (SPR)s12894-015-0084-8-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng de Vries, Anna H. verfasserin aut High acceptability of a newly developed urological practical skills training program 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © de Vries et al. 2015 Background Benefits of simulation training are widely recognized, but its structural implementation into urological curricula remains challenging. This study aims to gain insight into current and ideal urological practical skills training and presents the outline of a newly developed skills training program, including an assessment of the design characteristics that may increase its acceptability. Methods A questionnaire was sent to the urology residents (n = 87) and program directors (n = 45) of all Dutch teaching hospitals. Open- and close-ended questions were used to determine the views on current and ideal skills training and the newly developed skills training program. Eight semi-structured interviews were conducted with 39 residents and 15 program directors. All interviews were audiotaped, fully transcribed, and thereafter analyzed. Results Response was 87.4 % for residents and 86.7 % for program directors. Residents appeared to be still predominantly trained ‘by doing’. Structured practical skills training in local hospitals takes place according to 12 % of the residents versus 44 % of the program directors (p < 0.001). Ideally, residents prefer to practice certain procedures on simulation models first, especially in endourology. The majority of residents (92 %) and program directors (87 %) approved of implementing the newly developed skills training program (p = 0.51). ‘Structured scheduling’, ‘use of peer teaching’ and ‘high fidelity models’ were indicated as design characteristics that increase its acceptability. Conclusions Current urological residency training consists of patient-related ‘learning by doing’, although more practice on simulation models is desired. The acceptability of implementing the presented skills-training program is high. Design characteristics that increase its acceptability are structured scheduling, the use of peer teaching and high fidelity models. Program Director (dpeaa)DE-He213 Skill Training (dpeaa)DE-He213 Practical Skill (dpeaa)DE-He213 Fidelity Model (dpeaa)DE-He213 Skill Training Program (dpeaa)DE-He213 van Luijk, Scheltus J. aut Scherpbier, Albert J. J. A. aut Hendrikx, Ad J. M. aut Koldewijn, Evert L. aut Wagner, Cordula aut Schout, Barbara M. A. aut Enthalten in BMC urology London : BioMed Central, 2001 15(2015), 1 vom: 04. Sept. (DE-627)335488811 (DE-600)2059857-9 1471-2490 nnns volume:15 year:2015 number:1 day:04 month:09 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-015-0084-8 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 15 2015 1 04 09
spelling	10.1186/s12894-015-0084-8 doi (DE-627)SPR028236890 (SPR)s12894-015-0084-8-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng de Vries, Anna H. verfasserin aut High acceptability of a newly developed urological practical skills training program 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © de Vries et al. 2015 Background Benefits of simulation training are widely recognized, but its structural implementation into urological curricula remains challenging. This study aims to gain insight into current and ideal urological practical skills training and presents the outline of a newly developed skills training program, including an assessment of the design characteristics that may increase its acceptability. Methods A questionnaire was sent to the urology residents (n = 87) and program directors (n = 45) of all Dutch teaching hospitals. Open- and close-ended questions were used to determine the views on current and ideal skills training and the newly developed skills training program. Eight semi-structured interviews were conducted with 39 residents and 15 program directors. All interviews were audiotaped, fully transcribed, and thereafter analyzed. Results Response was 87.4 % for residents and 86.7 % for program directors. Residents appeared to be still predominantly trained ‘by doing’. Structured practical skills training in local hospitals takes place according to 12 % of the residents versus 44 % of the program directors (p < 0.001). Ideally, residents prefer to practice certain procedures on simulation models first, especially in endourology. The majority of residents (92 %) and program directors (87 %) approved of implementing the newly developed skills training program (p = 0.51). ‘Structured scheduling’, ‘use of peer teaching’ and ‘high fidelity models’ were indicated as design characteristics that increase its acceptability. Conclusions Current urological residency training consists of patient-related ‘learning by doing’, although more practice on simulation models is desired. The acceptability of implementing the presented skills-training program is high. Design characteristics that increase its acceptability are structured scheduling, the use of peer teaching and high fidelity models. Program Director (dpeaa)DE-He213 Skill Training (dpeaa)DE-He213 Practical Skill (dpeaa)DE-He213 Fidelity Model (dpeaa)DE-He213 Skill Training Program (dpeaa)DE-He213 van Luijk, Scheltus J. aut Scherpbier, Albert J. J. A. aut Hendrikx, Ad J. M. aut Koldewijn, Evert L. aut Wagner, Cordula aut Schout, Barbara M. A. aut Enthalten in BMC urology London : BioMed Central, 2001 15(2015), 1 vom: 04. Sept. (DE-627)335488811 (DE-600)2059857-9 1471-2490 nnns volume:15 year:2015 number:1 day:04 month:09 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-015-0084-8 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 15 2015 1 04 09
allfields_unstemmed	10.1186/s12894-015-0084-8 doi (DE-627)SPR028236890 (SPR)s12894-015-0084-8-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng de Vries, Anna H. verfasserin aut High acceptability of a newly developed urological practical skills training program 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © de Vries et al. 2015 Background Benefits of simulation training are widely recognized, but its structural implementation into urological curricula remains challenging. This study aims to gain insight into current and ideal urological practical skills training and presents the outline of a newly developed skills training program, including an assessment of the design characteristics that may increase its acceptability. Methods A questionnaire was sent to the urology residents (n = 87) and program directors (n = 45) of all Dutch teaching hospitals. Open- and close-ended questions were used to determine the views on current and ideal skills training and the newly developed skills training program. Eight semi-structured interviews were conducted with 39 residents and 15 program directors. All interviews were audiotaped, fully transcribed, and thereafter analyzed. Results Response was 87.4 % for residents and 86.7 % for program directors. Residents appeared to be still predominantly trained ‘by doing’. Structured practical skills training in local hospitals takes place according to 12 % of the residents versus 44 % of the program directors (p < 0.001). Ideally, residents prefer to practice certain procedures on simulation models first, especially in endourology. The majority of residents (92 %) and program directors (87 %) approved of implementing the newly developed skills training program (p = 0.51). ‘Structured scheduling’, ‘use of peer teaching’ and ‘high fidelity models’ were indicated as design characteristics that increase its acceptability. Conclusions Current urological residency training consists of patient-related ‘learning by doing’, although more practice on simulation models is desired. The acceptability of implementing the presented skills-training program is high. Design characteristics that increase its acceptability are structured scheduling, the use of peer teaching and high fidelity models. Program Director (dpeaa)DE-He213 Skill Training (dpeaa)DE-He213 Practical Skill (dpeaa)DE-He213 Fidelity Model (dpeaa)DE-He213 Skill Training Program (dpeaa)DE-He213 van Luijk, Scheltus J. aut Scherpbier, Albert J. J. A. aut Hendrikx, Ad J. M. aut Koldewijn, Evert L. aut Wagner, Cordula aut Schout, Barbara M. A. aut Enthalten in BMC urology London : BioMed Central, 2001 15(2015), 1 vom: 04. Sept. (DE-627)335488811 (DE-600)2059857-9 1471-2490 nnns volume:15 year:2015 number:1 day:04 month:09 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-015-0084-8 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 15 2015 1 04 09
allfieldsGer	10.1186/s12894-015-0084-8 doi (DE-627)SPR028236890 (SPR)s12894-015-0084-8-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng de Vries, Anna H. verfasserin aut High acceptability of a newly developed urological practical skills training program 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © de Vries et al. 2015 Background Benefits of simulation training are widely recognized, but its structural implementation into urological curricula remains challenging. This study aims to gain insight into current and ideal urological practical skills training and presents the outline of a newly developed skills training program, including an assessment of the design characteristics that may increase its acceptability. Methods A questionnaire was sent to the urology residents (n = 87) and program directors (n = 45) of all Dutch teaching hospitals. Open- and close-ended questions were used to determine the views on current and ideal skills training and the newly developed skills training program. Eight semi-structured interviews were conducted with 39 residents and 15 program directors. All interviews were audiotaped, fully transcribed, and thereafter analyzed. Results Response was 87.4 % for residents and 86.7 % for program directors. Residents appeared to be still predominantly trained ‘by doing’. Structured practical skills training in local hospitals takes place according to 12 % of the residents versus 44 % of the program directors (p < 0.001). Ideally, residents prefer to practice certain procedures on simulation models first, especially in endourology. The majority of residents (92 %) and program directors (87 %) approved of implementing the newly developed skills training program (p = 0.51). ‘Structured scheduling’, ‘use of peer teaching’ and ‘high fidelity models’ were indicated as design characteristics that increase its acceptability. Conclusions Current urological residency training consists of patient-related ‘learning by doing’, although more practice on simulation models is desired. The acceptability of implementing the presented skills-training program is high. Design characteristics that increase its acceptability are structured scheduling, the use of peer teaching and high fidelity models. Program Director (dpeaa)DE-He213 Skill Training (dpeaa)DE-He213 Practical Skill (dpeaa)DE-He213 Fidelity Model (dpeaa)DE-He213 Skill Training Program (dpeaa)DE-He213 van Luijk, Scheltus J. aut Scherpbier, Albert J. J. A. aut Hendrikx, Ad J. M. aut Koldewijn, Evert L. aut Wagner, Cordula aut Schout, Barbara M. A. aut Enthalten in BMC urology London : BioMed Central, 2001 15(2015), 1 vom: 04. Sept. (DE-627)335488811 (DE-600)2059857-9 1471-2490 nnns volume:15 year:2015 number:1 day:04 month:09 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-015-0084-8 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 15 2015 1 04 09
allfieldsSound	10.1186/s12894-015-0084-8 doi (DE-627)SPR028236890 (SPR)s12894-015-0084-8-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng de Vries, Anna H. verfasserin aut High acceptability of a newly developed urological practical skills training program 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © de Vries et al. 2015 Background Benefits of simulation training are widely recognized, but its structural implementation into urological curricula remains challenging. This study aims to gain insight into current and ideal urological practical skills training and presents the outline of a newly developed skills training program, including an assessment of the design characteristics that may increase its acceptability. Methods A questionnaire was sent to the urology residents (n = 87) and program directors (n = 45) of all Dutch teaching hospitals. Open- and close-ended questions were used to determine the views on current and ideal skills training and the newly developed skills training program. Eight semi-structured interviews were conducted with 39 residents and 15 program directors. All interviews were audiotaped, fully transcribed, and thereafter analyzed. Results Response was 87.4 % for residents and 86.7 % for program directors. Residents appeared to be still predominantly trained ‘by doing’. Structured practical skills training in local hospitals takes place according to 12 % of the residents versus 44 % of the program directors (p < 0.001). Ideally, residents prefer to practice certain procedures on simulation models first, especially in endourology. The majority of residents (92 %) and program directors (87 %) approved of implementing the newly developed skills training program (p = 0.51). ‘Structured scheduling’, ‘use of peer teaching’ and ‘high fidelity models’ were indicated as design characteristics that increase its acceptability. Conclusions Current urological residency training consists of patient-related ‘learning by doing’, although more practice on simulation models is desired. The acceptability of implementing the presented skills-training program is high. Design characteristics that increase its acceptability are structured scheduling, the use of peer teaching and high fidelity models. Program Director (dpeaa)DE-He213 Skill Training (dpeaa)DE-He213 Practical Skill (dpeaa)DE-He213 Fidelity Model (dpeaa)DE-He213 Skill Training Program (dpeaa)DE-He213 van Luijk, Scheltus J. aut Scherpbier, Albert J. J. A. aut Hendrikx, Ad J. M. aut Koldewijn, Evert L. aut Wagner, Cordula aut Schout, Barbara M. A. aut Enthalten in BMC urology London : BioMed Central, 2001 15(2015), 1 vom: 04. Sept. (DE-627)335488811 (DE-600)2059857-9 1471-2490 nnns volume:15 year:2015 number:1 day:04 month:09 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-015-0084-8 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 15 2015 1 04 09
language	English
source	Enthalten in BMC urology 15(2015), 1 vom: 04. Sept. volume:15 year:2015 number:1 day:04 month:09
sourceStr	Enthalten in BMC urology 15(2015), 1 vom: 04. Sept. volume:15 year:2015 number:1 day:04 month:09
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Program Director Skill Training Practical Skill Fidelity Model Skill Training Program
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	BMC urology
authorswithroles_txt_mv	de Vries, Anna H. @@aut@@ van Luijk, Scheltus J. @@aut@@ Scherpbier, Albert J. J. A. @@aut@@ Hendrikx, Ad J. M. @@aut@@ Koldewijn, Evert L. @@aut@@ Wagner, Cordula @@aut@@ Schout, Barbara M. A. @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2015-09-04T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	335488811
id	SPR028236890
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR028236890</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519232222.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2015 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/s12894-015-0084-8</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR028236890</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s12894-015-0084-8-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">de Vries, Anna H.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">High acceptability of a newly developed urological practical skills training program</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© de Vries et al. 2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background Benefits of simulation training are widely recognized, but its structural implementation into urological curricula remains challenging. This study aims to gain insight into current and ideal urological practical skills training and presents the outline of a newly developed skills training program, including an assessment of the design characteristics that may increase its acceptability. Methods A questionnaire was sent to the urology residents (n = 87) and program directors (n = 45) of all Dutch teaching hospitals. Open- and close-ended questions were used to determine the views on current and ideal skills training and the newly developed skills training program. Eight semi-structured interviews were conducted with 39 residents and 15 program directors. All interviews were audiotaped, fully transcribed, and thereafter analyzed. Results Response was 87.4 % for residents and 86.7 % for program directors. Residents appeared to be still predominantly trained ‘by doing’. Structured practical skills training in local hospitals takes place according to 12 % of the residents versus 44 % of the program directors (p < 0.001). Ideally, residents prefer to practice certain procedures on simulation models first, especially in endourology. The majority of residents (92 %) and program directors (87 %) approved of implementing the newly developed skills training program (p = 0.51). ‘Structured scheduling’, ‘use of peer teaching’ and ‘high fidelity models’ were indicated as design characteristics that increase its acceptability. Conclusions Current urological residency training consists of patient-related ‘learning by doing’, although more practice on simulation models is desired. The acceptability of implementing the presented skills-training program is high. Design characteristics that increase its acceptability are structured scheduling, the use of peer teaching and high fidelity models.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Program Director</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Skill Training</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Practical Skill</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fidelity Model</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Skill Training Program</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">van Luijk, Scheltus J.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Scherpbier, Albert J. J. A.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hendrikx, Ad J. M.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Koldewijn, Evert L.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wagner, Cordula</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schout, Barbara M. A.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">BMC urology</subfield><subfield code="d">London : BioMed Central, 2001</subfield><subfield code="g">15(2015), 1 vom: 04. Sept.</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)335488811</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2059857-9</subfield><subfield code="x">1471-2490</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:15</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:04</subfield><subfield code="g">month:09</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-015-0084-8</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">15</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">04</subfield><subfield code="c">09</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	de Vries, Anna H.
spellingShingle	de Vries, Anna H. misc Program Director misc Skill Training misc Practical Skill misc Fidelity Model misc Skill Training Program High acceptability of a newly developed urological practical skills training program
authorStr	de Vries, Anna H.
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)335488811
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	springer
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	1471-2490
topic_title	High acceptability of a newly developed urological practical skills training program Program Director (dpeaa)DE-He213 Skill Training (dpeaa)DE-He213 Practical Skill (dpeaa)DE-He213 Fidelity Model (dpeaa)DE-He213 Skill Training Program (dpeaa)DE-He213
topic	misc Program Director misc Skill Training misc Practical Skill misc Fidelity Model misc Skill Training Program
topic_unstemmed	misc Program Director misc Skill Training misc Practical Skill misc Fidelity Model misc Skill Training Program
topic_browse	misc Program Director misc Skill Training misc Practical Skill misc Fidelity Model misc Skill Training Program
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	BMC urology
hierarchy_parent_id	335488811
hierarchy_top_title	BMC urology
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)335488811 (DE-600)2059857-9
title	High acceptability of a newly developed urological practical skills training program
ctrlnum	(DE-627)SPR028236890 (SPR)s12894-015-0084-8-e
title_full	High acceptability of a newly developed urological practical skills training program
author_sort	de Vries, Anna H.
journal	BMC urology
journalStr	BMC urology
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2015
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	de Vries, Anna H. van Luijk, Scheltus J. Scherpbier, Albert J. J. A. Hendrikx, Ad J. M. Koldewijn, Evert L. Wagner, Cordula Schout, Barbara M. A.
container_volume	15
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	de Vries, Anna H.
doi_str_mv	10.1186/s12894-015-0084-8
title_sort	high acceptability of a newly developed urological practical skills training program
title_auth	High acceptability of a newly developed urological practical skills training program
abstract	Background Benefits of simulation training are widely recognized, but its structural implementation into urological curricula remains challenging. This study aims to gain insight into current and ideal urological practical skills training and presents the outline of a newly developed skills training program, including an assessment of the design characteristics that may increase its acceptability. Methods A questionnaire was sent to the urology residents (n = 87) and program directors (n = 45) of all Dutch teaching hospitals. Open- and close-ended questions were used to determine the views on current and ideal skills training and the newly developed skills training program. Eight semi-structured interviews were conducted with 39 residents and 15 program directors. All interviews were audiotaped, fully transcribed, and thereafter analyzed. Results Response was 87.4 % for residents and 86.7 % for program directors. Residents appeared to be still predominantly trained ‘by doing’. Structured practical skills training in local hospitals takes place according to 12 % of the residents versus 44 % of the program directors (p < 0.001). Ideally, residents prefer to practice certain procedures on simulation models first, especially in endourology. The majority of residents (92 %) and program directors (87 %) approved of implementing the newly developed skills training program (p = 0.51). ‘Structured scheduling’, ‘use of peer teaching’ and ‘high fidelity models’ were indicated as design characteristics that increase its acceptability. Conclusions Current urological residency training consists of patient-related ‘learning by doing’, although more practice on simulation models is desired. The acceptability of implementing the presented skills-training program is high. Design characteristics that increase its acceptability are structured scheduling, the use of peer teaching and high fidelity models. © de Vries et al. 2015
abstractGer	Background Benefits of simulation training are widely recognized, but its structural implementation into urological curricula remains challenging. This study aims to gain insight into current and ideal urological practical skills training and presents the outline of a newly developed skills training program, including an assessment of the design characteristics that may increase its acceptability. Methods A questionnaire was sent to the urology residents (n = 87) and program directors (n = 45) of all Dutch teaching hospitals. Open- and close-ended questions were used to determine the views on current and ideal skills training and the newly developed skills training program. Eight semi-structured interviews were conducted with 39 residents and 15 program directors. All interviews were audiotaped, fully transcribed, and thereafter analyzed. Results Response was 87.4 % for residents and 86.7 % for program directors. Residents appeared to be still predominantly trained ‘by doing’. Structured practical skills training in local hospitals takes place according to 12 % of the residents versus 44 % of the program directors (p < 0.001). Ideally, residents prefer to practice certain procedures on simulation models first, especially in endourology. The majority of residents (92 %) and program directors (87 %) approved of implementing the newly developed skills training program (p = 0.51). ‘Structured scheduling’, ‘use of peer teaching’ and ‘high fidelity models’ were indicated as design characteristics that increase its acceptability. Conclusions Current urological residency training consists of patient-related ‘learning by doing’, although more practice on simulation models is desired. The acceptability of implementing the presented skills-training program is high. Design characteristics that increase its acceptability are structured scheduling, the use of peer teaching and high fidelity models. © de Vries et al. 2015
abstract_unstemmed	Background Benefits of simulation training are widely recognized, but its structural implementation into urological curricula remains challenging. This study aims to gain insight into current and ideal urological practical skills training and presents the outline of a newly developed skills training program, including an assessment of the design characteristics that may increase its acceptability. Methods A questionnaire was sent to the urology residents (n = 87) and program directors (n = 45) of all Dutch teaching hospitals. Open- and close-ended questions were used to determine the views on current and ideal skills training and the newly developed skills training program. Eight semi-structured interviews were conducted with 39 residents and 15 program directors. All interviews were audiotaped, fully transcribed, and thereafter analyzed. Results Response was 87.4 % for residents and 86.7 % for program directors. Residents appeared to be still predominantly trained ‘by doing’. Structured practical skills training in local hospitals takes place according to 12 % of the residents versus 44 % of the program directors (p < 0.001). Ideally, residents prefer to practice certain procedures on simulation models first, especially in endourology. The majority of residents (92 %) and program directors (87 %) approved of implementing the newly developed skills training program (p = 0.51). ‘Structured scheduling’, ‘use of peer teaching’ and ‘high fidelity models’ were indicated as design characteristics that increase its acceptability. Conclusions Current urological residency training consists of patient-related ‘learning by doing’, although more practice on simulation models is desired. The acceptability of implementing the presented skills-training program is high. Design characteristics that increase its acceptability are structured scheduling, the use of peer teaching and high fidelity models. © de Vries et al. 2015
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	1
title_short	High acceptability of a newly developed urological practical skills training program
url	https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-015-0084-8
remote_bool	true
author2	van Luijk, Scheltus J. Scherpbier, Albert J. J. A. Hendrikx, Ad J. M. Koldewijn, Evert L. Wagner, Cordula Schout, Barbara M. A.
author2Str	van Luijk, Scheltus J. Scherpbier, Albert J. J. A. Hendrikx, Ad J. M. Koldewijn, Evert L. Wagner, Cordula Schout, Barbara M. A.
ppnlink	335488811
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1186/s12894-015-0084-8
up_date	2024-07-03T18:09:48.778Z
_version_	1803582375230177280
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR028236890</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519232222.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2015 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/s12894-015-0084-8</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR028236890</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s12894-015-0084-8-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">de Vries, Anna H.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">High acceptability of a newly developed urological practical skills training program</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© de Vries et al. 2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background Benefits of simulation training are widely recognized, but its structural implementation into urological curricula remains challenging. This study aims to gain insight into current and ideal urological practical skills training and presents the outline of a newly developed skills training program, including an assessment of the design characteristics that may increase its acceptability. Methods A questionnaire was sent to the urology residents (n = 87) and program directors (n = 45) of all Dutch teaching hospitals. Open- and close-ended questions were used to determine the views on current and ideal skills training and the newly developed skills training program. Eight semi-structured interviews were conducted with 39 residents and 15 program directors. All interviews were audiotaped, fully transcribed, and thereafter analyzed. Results Response was 87.4 % for residents and 86.7 % for program directors. Residents appeared to be still predominantly trained ‘by doing’. Structured practical skills training in local hospitals takes place according to 12 % of the residents versus 44 % of the program directors (p < 0.001). Ideally, residents prefer to practice certain procedures on simulation models first, especially in endourology. The majority of residents (92 %) and program directors (87 %) approved of implementing the newly developed skills training program (p = 0.51). ‘Structured scheduling’, ‘use of peer teaching’ and ‘high fidelity models’ were indicated as design characteristics that increase its acceptability. Conclusions Current urological residency training consists of patient-related ‘learning by doing’, although more practice on simulation models is desired. The acceptability of implementing the presented skills-training program is high. Design characteristics that increase its acceptability are structured scheduling, the use of peer teaching and high fidelity models.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Program Director</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Skill Training</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Practical Skill</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fidelity Model</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Skill Training Program</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">van Luijk, Scheltus J.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Scherpbier, Albert J. J. A.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hendrikx, Ad J. M.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Koldewijn, Evert L.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wagner, Cordula</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schout, Barbara M. A.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">BMC urology</subfield><subfield code="d">London : BioMed Central, 2001</subfield><subfield code="g">15(2015), 1 vom: 04. Sept.</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)335488811</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2059857-9</subfield><subfield code="x">1471-2490</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:15</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:04</subfield><subfield code="g">month:09</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-015-0084-8</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">15</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">04</subfield><subfield code="c">09</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.402936

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

High acceptability of a newly developed urological practical skills training program

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?