Small-scale evaluation of the efficacy and residual activity of alpha-cypermethrin WG (250 g AI/kg) for indoor spraying in comparison with alpha-cypermethrin WP (50 g AI/kg) in India
Background Indoor residual spraying (IRS) with different formulations of insecticides is being used for the control of mosquito vectors in many countries. In the present study, residual efficacy and duration of effectiveness of IRS with alpha-cypermethrin WG-SB (250 g AI/$ m^{2} $) formulation was c...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Uragayala, Sreehari [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2015 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Anmerkung: |
© Uragayala et al. 2015. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Malaria journal - London : BioMed Central, 2002, 14(2015), 1 vom: 29. Mai |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:14 ; year:2015 ; number:1 ; day:29 ; month:05 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1186/s12936-015-0739-7 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
SPR028640578 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | SPR028640578 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230520011543.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 201007s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s12936-015-0739-7 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)SPR028640578 | ||
035 | |a (SPR)s12936-015-0739-7-e | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Uragayala, Sreehari |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Small-scale evaluation of the efficacy and residual activity of alpha-cypermethrin WG (250 g AI/kg) for indoor spraying in comparison with alpha-cypermethrin WP (50 g AI/kg) in India |
264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © Uragayala et al. 2015. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( | ||
520 | |a Background Indoor residual spraying (IRS) with different formulations of insecticides is being used for the control of mosquito vectors in many countries. In the present study, residual efficacy and duration of effectiveness of IRS with alpha-cypermethrin WG-SB (250 g AI/$ m^{2} $) formulation was compared with WP formulation (50 g AI/kg) in a small scale (Phase II) field trial. Methods Two dosages, i.e. 20 and 30 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, were used and the efficacy and duration of effectiveness was assessed on alpha-cypermethrin susceptible population of Anopheles stephensi. Four types of surfaces were selected, namely cement wall with distemper coating, cement wall with lime coating, mud wall with lime coating, and brick wall unpainted. Spraying was carried out with Hudson sprayer fitted with control flow valve. Bioassays were carried out at weekly and then fortnightly intervals. Chemical analysis of filter paper samples collected from the sprayed surfaces was done at Walloon Agricultural Research Institute, Gembloux, Belgium. Results Alpha-cypermethrin WG-SB showed residual efficacy (>80 % mortality) for 13–15 weeks for the 20 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage and 13–16 weeks for the 30 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage, whereas alpha-cypermethrin WP showed residual efficacy for 11–15 weeks for the 20 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage and 11–14 weeks for the 30 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage on the surfaces tested. The average of the applied to target dose ratio ranged from 0.89 to 1.17 for alpha-cypermethrin WG-SB at 20 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, 0.83–1.80 for the WG-SB at 30 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, 0.87–1.66 for alpha-cypermethrin WP at 20 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, and 0.68–1.06 for WP at 30 mg AI/$ m^{2} $. No adverse events were reported, either by the spray men or the household inhabitants, during and after the spray operations. Conclusions The results suggest that the dose of WG 30 mg/$ m^{2} $ gave slightly longer effective residual action against malaria vector (16 weeks) on most common indoor surfaces and could be used for effective control of Anopheles mosquitoes. The WG formulation was found to be easy to handle, no smell was reported during the spraying and was found to be operationally acceptable for indoor residual spraying. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Alpha-cypermethrin |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Indoor residual spraying |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Residual efficacy |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
700 | 1 | |a Kamaraju, Raghavendra |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Tiwari, Satyanarayana |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ghosh, Sushanta Kumar |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Valecha, Neena |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Malaria journal |d London : BioMed Central, 2002 |g 14(2015), 1 vom: 29. Mai |w (DE-627)355986582 |w (DE-600)2091229-8 |x 1475-2875 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:14 |g year:2015 |g number:1 |g day:29 |g month:05 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-0739-7 |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2001 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2008 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2010 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2021 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2031 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2038 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2050 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2056 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2057 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2061 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2113 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2190 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 14 |j 2015 |e 1 |b 29 |c 05 |
author_variant |
s u su r k rk s t st s k g sk skg n v nv |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:14752875:2015----::mlsaevlainfhefccadeiulciiyflhcprehiw20akfrnorpaignoprs |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2015 |
publishDate |
2015 |
allfields |
10.1186/s12936-015-0739-7 doi (DE-627)SPR028640578 (SPR)s12936-015-0739-7-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Uragayala, Sreehari verfasserin aut Small-scale evaluation of the efficacy and residual activity of alpha-cypermethrin WG (250 g AI/kg) for indoor spraying in comparison with alpha-cypermethrin WP (50 g AI/kg) in India 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Uragayala et al. 2015. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( Background Indoor residual spraying (IRS) with different formulations of insecticides is being used for the control of mosquito vectors in many countries. In the present study, residual efficacy and duration of effectiveness of IRS with alpha-cypermethrin WG-SB (250 g AI/$ m^{2} $) formulation was compared with WP formulation (50 g AI/kg) in a small scale (Phase II) field trial. Methods Two dosages, i.e. 20 and 30 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, were used and the efficacy and duration of effectiveness was assessed on alpha-cypermethrin susceptible population of Anopheles stephensi. Four types of surfaces were selected, namely cement wall with distemper coating, cement wall with lime coating, mud wall with lime coating, and brick wall unpainted. Spraying was carried out with Hudson sprayer fitted with control flow valve. Bioassays were carried out at weekly and then fortnightly intervals. Chemical analysis of filter paper samples collected from the sprayed surfaces was done at Walloon Agricultural Research Institute, Gembloux, Belgium. Results Alpha-cypermethrin WG-SB showed residual efficacy (>80 % mortality) for 13–15 weeks for the 20 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage and 13–16 weeks for the 30 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage, whereas alpha-cypermethrin WP showed residual efficacy for 11–15 weeks for the 20 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage and 11–14 weeks for the 30 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage on the surfaces tested. The average of the applied to target dose ratio ranged from 0.89 to 1.17 for alpha-cypermethrin WG-SB at 20 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, 0.83–1.80 for the WG-SB at 30 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, 0.87–1.66 for alpha-cypermethrin WP at 20 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, and 0.68–1.06 for WP at 30 mg AI/$ m^{2} $. No adverse events were reported, either by the spray men or the household inhabitants, during and after the spray operations. Conclusions The results suggest that the dose of WG 30 mg/$ m^{2} $ gave slightly longer effective residual action against malaria vector (16 weeks) on most common indoor surfaces and could be used for effective control of Anopheles mosquitoes. The WG formulation was found to be easy to handle, no smell was reported during the spraying and was found to be operationally acceptable for indoor residual spraying. Alpha-cypermethrin (dpeaa)DE-He213 Indoor residual spraying (dpeaa)DE-He213 Residual efficacy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Kamaraju, Raghavendra aut Tiwari, Satyanarayana aut Ghosh, Sushanta Kumar aut Valecha, Neena aut Enthalten in Malaria journal London : BioMed Central, 2002 14(2015), 1 vom: 29. Mai (DE-627)355986582 (DE-600)2091229-8 1475-2875 nnns volume:14 year:2015 number:1 day:29 month:05 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-0739-7 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 14 2015 1 29 05 |
spelling |
10.1186/s12936-015-0739-7 doi (DE-627)SPR028640578 (SPR)s12936-015-0739-7-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Uragayala, Sreehari verfasserin aut Small-scale evaluation of the efficacy and residual activity of alpha-cypermethrin WG (250 g AI/kg) for indoor spraying in comparison with alpha-cypermethrin WP (50 g AI/kg) in India 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Uragayala et al. 2015. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( Background Indoor residual spraying (IRS) with different formulations of insecticides is being used for the control of mosquito vectors in many countries. In the present study, residual efficacy and duration of effectiveness of IRS with alpha-cypermethrin WG-SB (250 g AI/$ m^{2} $) formulation was compared with WP formulation (50 g AI/kg) in a small scale (Phase II) field trial. Methods Two dosages, i.e. 20 and 30 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, were used and the efficacy and duration of effectiveness was assessed on alpha-cypermethrin susceptible population of Anopheles stephensi. Four types of surfaces were selected, namely cement wall with distemper coating, cement wall with lime coating, mud wall with lime coating, and brick wall unpainted. Spraying was carried out with Hudson sprayer fitted with control flow valve. Bioassays were carried out at weekly and then fortnightly intervals. Chemical analysis of filter paper samples collected from the sprayed surfaces was done at Walloon Agricultural Research Institute, Gembloux, Belgium. Results Alpha-cypermethrin WG-SB showed residual efficacy (>80 % mortality) for 13–15 weeks for the 20 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage and 13–16 weeks for the 30 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage, whereas alpha-cypermethrin WP showed residual efficacy for 11–15 weeks for the 20 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage and 11–14 weeks for the 30 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage on the surfaces tested. The average of the applied to target dose ratio ranged from 0.89 to 1.17 for alpha-cypermethrin WG-SB at 20 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, 0.83–1.80 for the WG-SB at 30 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, 0.87–1.66 for alpha-cypermethrin WP at 20 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, and 0.68–1.06 for WP at 30 mg AI/$ m^{2} $. No adverse events were reported, either by the spray men or the household inhabitants, during and after the spray operations. Conclusions The results suggest that the dose of WG 30 mg/$ m^{2} $ gave slightly longer effective residual action against malaria vector (16 weeks) on most common indoor surfaces and could be used for effective control of Anopheles mosquitoes. The WG formulation was found to be easy to handle, no smell was reported during the spraying and was found to be operationally acceptable for indoor residual spraying. Alpha-cypermethrin (dpeaa)DE-He213 Indoor residual spraying (dpeaa)DE-He213 Residual efficacy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Kamaraju, Raghavendra aut Tiwari, Satyanarayana aut Ghosh, Sushanta Kumar aut Valecha, Neena aut Enthalten in Malaria journal London : BioMed Central, 2002 14(2015), 1 vom: 29. Mai (DE-627)355986582 (DE-600)2091229-8 1475-2875 nnns volume:14 year:2015 number:1 day:29 month:05 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-0739-7 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 14 2015 1 29 05 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1186/s12936-015-0739-7 doi (DE-627)SPR028640578 (SPR)s12936-015-0739-7-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Uragayala, Sreehari verfasserin aut Small-scale evaluation of the efficacy and residual activity of alpha-cypermethrin WG (250 g AI/kg) for indoor spraying in comparison with alpha-cypermethrin WP (50 g AI/kg) in India 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Uragayala et al. 2015. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( Background Indoor residual spraying (IRS) with different formulations of insecticides is being used for the control of mosquito vectors in many countries. In the present study, residual efficacy and duration of effectiveness of IRS with alpha-cypermethrin WG-SB (250 g AI/$ m^{2} $) formulation was compared with WP formulation (50 g AI/kg) in a small scale (Phase II) field trial. Methods Two dosages, i.e. 20 and 30 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, were used and the efficacy and duration of effectiveness was assessed on alpha-cypermethrin susceptible population of Anopheles stephensi. Four types of surfaces were selected, namely cement wall with distemper coating, cement wall with lime coating, mud wall with lime coating, and brick wall unpainted. Spraying was carried out with Hudson sprayer fitted with control flow valve. Bioassays were carried out at weekly and then fortnightly intervals. Chemical analysis of filter paper samples collected from the sprayed surfaces was done at Walloon Agricultural Research Institute, Gembloux, Belgium. Results Alpha-cypermethrin WG-SB showed residual efficacy (>80 % mortality) for 13–15 weeks for the 20 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage and 13–16 weeks for the 30 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage, whereas alpha-cypermethrin WP showed residual efficacy for 11–15 weeks for the 20 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage and 11–14 weeks for the 30 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage on the surfaces tested. The average of the applied to target dose ratio ranged from 0.89 to 1.17 for alpha-cypermethrin WG-SB at 20 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, 0.83–1.80 for the WG-SB at 30 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, 0.87–1.66 for alpha-cypermethrin WP at 20 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, and 0.68–1.06 for WP at 30 mg AI/$ m^{2} $. No adverse events were reported, either by the spray men or the household inhabitants, during and after the spray operations. Conclusions The results suggest that the dose of WG 30 mg/$ m^{2} $ gave slightly longer effective residual action against malaria vector (16 weeks) on most common indoor surfaces and could be used for effective control of Anopheles mosquitoes. The WG formulation was found to be easy to handle, no smell was reported during the spraying and was found to be operationally acceptable for indoor residual spraying. Alpha-cypermethrin (dpeaa)DE-He213 Indoor residual spraying (dpeaa)DE-He213 Residual efficacy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Kamaraju, Raghavendra aut Tiwari, Satyanarayana aut Ghosh, Sushanta Kumar aut Valecha, Neena aut Enthalten in Malaria journal London : BioMed Central, 2002 14(2015), 1 vom: 29. Mai (DE-627)355986582 (DE-600)2091229-8 1475-2875 nnns volume:14 year:2015 number:1 day:29 month:05 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-0739-7 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 14 2015 1 29 05 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1186/s12936-015-0739-7 doi (DE-627)SPR028640578 (SPR)s12936-015-0739-7-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Uragayala, Sreehari verfasserin aut Small-scale evaluation of the efficacy and residual activity of alpha-cypermethrin WG (250 g AI/kg) for indoor spraying in comparison with alpha-cypermethrin WP (50 g AI/kg) in India 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Uragayala et al. 2015. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( Background Indoor residual spraying (IRS) with different formulations of insecticides is being used for the control of mosquito vectors in many countries. In the present study, residual efficacy and duration of effectiveness of IRS with alpha-cypermethrin WG-SB (250 g AI/$ m^{2} $) formulation was compared with WP formulation (50 g AI/kg) in a small scale (Phase II) field trial. Methods Two dosages, i.e. 20 and 30 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, were used and the efficacy and duration of effectiveness was assessed on alpha-cypermethrin susceptible population of Anopheles stephensi. Four types of surfaces were selected, namely cement wall with distemper coating, cement wall with lime coating, mud wall with lime coating, and brick wall unpainted. Spraying was carried out with Hudson sprayer fitted with control flow valve. Bioassays were carried out at weekly and then fortnightly intervals. Chemical analysis of filter paper samples collected from the sprayed surfaces was done at Walloon Agricultural Research Institute, Gembloux, Belgium. Results Alpha-cypermethrin WG-SB showed residual efficacy (>80 % mortality) for 13–15 weeks for the 20 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage and 13–16 weeks for the 30 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage, whereas alpha-cypermethrin WP showed residual efficacy for 11–15 weeks for the 20 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage and 11–14 weeks for the 30 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage on the surfaces tested. The average of the applied to target dose ratio ranged from 0.89 to 1.17 for alpha-cypermethrin WG-SB at 20 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, 0.83–1.80 for the WG-SB at 30 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, 0.87–1.66 for alpha-cypermethrin WP at 20 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, and 0.68–1.06 for WP at 30 mg AI/$ m^{2} $. No adverse events were reported, either by the spray men or the household inhabitants, during and after the spray operations. Conclusions The results suggest that the dose of WG 30 mg/$ m^{2} $ gave slightly longer effective residual action against malaria vector (16 weeks) on most common indoor surfaces and could be used for effective control of Anopheles mosquitoes. The WG formulation was found to be easy to handle, no smell was reported during the spraying and was found to be operationally acceptable for indoor residual spraying. Alpha-cypermethrin (dpeaa)DE-He213 Indoor residual spraying (dpeaa)DE-He213 Residual efficacy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Kamaraju, Raghavendra aut Tiwari, Satyanarayana aut Ghosh, Sushanta Kumar aut Valecha, Neena aut Enthalten in Malaria journal London : BioMed Central, 2002 14(2015), 1 vom: 29. Mai (DE-627)355986582 (DE-600)2091229-8 1475-2875 nnns volume:14 year:2015 number:1 day:29 month:05 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-0739-7 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 14 2015 1 29 05 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1186/s12936-015-0739-7 doi (DE-627)SPR028640578 (SPR)s12936-015-0739-7-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Uragayala, Sreehari verfasserin aut Small-scale evaluation of the efficacy and residual activity of alpha-cypermethrin WG (250 g AI/kg) for indoor spraying in comparison with alpha-cypermethrin WP (50 g AI/kg) in India 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Uragayala et al. 2015. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( Background Indoor residual spraying (IRS) with different formulations of insecticides is being used for the control of mosquito vectors in many countries. In the present study, residual efficacy and duration of effectiveness of IRS with alpha-cypermethrin WG-SB (250 g AI/$ m^{2} $) formulation was compared with WP formulation (50 g AI/kg) in a small scale (Phase II) field trial. Methods Two dosages, i.e. 20 and 30 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, were used and the efficacy and duration of effectiveness was assessed on alpha-cypermethrin susceptible population of Anopheles stephensi. Four types of surfaces were selected, namely cement wall with distemper coating, cement wall with lime coating, mud wall with lime coating, and brick wall unpainted. Spraying was carried out with Hudson sprayer fitted with control flow valve. Bioassays were carried out at weekly and then fortnightly intervals. Chemical analysis of filter paper samples collected from the sprayed surfaces was done at Walloon Agricultural Research Institute, Gembloux, Belgium. Results Alpha-cypermethrin WG-SB showed residual efficacy (>80 % mortality) for 13–15 weeks for the 20 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage and 13–16 weeks for the 30 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage, whereas alpha-cypermethrin WP showed residual efficacy for 11–15 weeks for the 20 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage and 11–14 weeks for the 30 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage on the surfaces tested. The average of the applied to target dose ratio ranged from 0.89 to 1.17 for alpha-cypermethrin WG-SB at 20 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, 0.83–1.80 for the WG-SB at 30 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, 0.87–1.66 for alpha-cypermethrin WP at 20 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, and 0.68–1.06 for WP at 30 mg AI/$ m^{2} $. No adverse events were reported, either by the spray men or the household inhabitants, during and after the spray operations. Conclusions The results suggest that the dose of WG 30 mg/$ m^{2} $ gave slightly longer effective residual action against malaria vector (16 weeks) on most common indoor surfaces and could be used for effective control of Anopheles mosquitoes. The WG formulation was found to be easy to handle, no smell was reported during the spraying and was found to be operationally acceptable for indoor residual spraying. Alpha-cypermethrin (dpeaa)DE-He213 Indoor residual spraying (dpeaa)DE-He213 Residual efficacy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Kamaraju, Raghavendra aut Tiwari, Satyanarayana aut Ghosh, Sushanta Kumar aut Valecha, Neena aut Enthalten in Malaria journal London : BioMed Central, 2002 14(2015), 1 vom: 29. Mai (DE-627)355986582 (DE-600)2091229-8 1475-2875 nnns volume:14 year:2015 number:1 day:29 month:05 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-0739-7 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 14 2015 1 29 05 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Malaria journal 14(2015), 1 vom: 29. Mai volume:14 year:2015 number:1 day:29 month:05 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Malaria journal 14(2015), 1 vom: 29. Mai volume:14 year:2015 number:1 day:29 month:05 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Alpha-cypermethrin Indoor residual spraying Residual efficacy |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Malaria journal |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Uragayala, Sreehari @@aut@@ Kamaraju, Raghavendra @@aut@@ Tiwari, Satyanarayana @@aut@@ Ghosh, Sushanta Kumar @@aut@@ Valecha, Neena @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-05-29T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
355986582 |
id |
SPR028640578 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR028640578</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230520011543.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/s12936-015-0739-7</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR028640578</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s12936-015-0739-7-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Uragayala, Sreehari</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Small-scale evaluation of the efficacy and residual activity of alpha-cypermethrin WG (250 g AI/kg) for indoor spraying in comparison with alpha-cypermethrin WP (50 g AI/kg) in India</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Uragayala et al. 2015. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background Indoor residual spraying (IRS) with different formulations of insecticides is being used for the control of mosquito vectors in many countries. In the present study, residual efficacy and duration of effectiveness of IRS with alpha-cypermethrin WG-SB (250 g AI/$ m^{2} $) formulation was compared with WP formulation (50 g AI/kg) in a small scale (Phase II) field trial. Methods Two dosages, i.e. 20 and 30 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, were used and the efficacy and duration of effectiveness was assessed on alpha-cypermethrin susceptible population of Anopheles stephensi. Four types of surfaces were selected, namely cement wall with distemper coating, cement wall with lime coating, mud wall with lime coating, and brick wall unpainted. Spraying was carried out with Hudson sprayer fitted with control flow valve. Bioassays were carried out at weekly and then fortnightly intervals. Chemical analysis of filter paper samples collected from the sprayed surfaces was done at Walloon Agricultural Research Institute, Gembloux, Belgium. Results Alpha-cypermethrin WG-SB showed residual efficacy (>80 % mortality) for 13–15 weeks for the 20 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage and 13–16 weeks for the 30 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage, whereas alpha-cypermethrin WP showed residual efficacy for 11–15 weeks for the 20 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage and 11–14 weeks for the 30 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage on the surfaces tested. The average of the applied to target dose ratio ranged from 0.89 to 1.17 for alpha-cypermethrin WG-SB at 20 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, 0.83–1.80 for the WG-SB at 30 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, 0.87–1.66 for alpha-cypermethrin WP at 20 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, and 0.68–1.06 for WP at 30 mg AI/$ m^{2} $. No adverse events were reported, either by the spray men or the household inhabitants, during and after the spray operations. Conclusions The results suggest that the dose of WG 30 mg/$ m^{2} $ gave slightly longer effective residual action against malaria vector (16 weeks) on most common indoor surfaces and could be used for effective control of Anopheles mosquitoes. The WG formulation was found to be easy to handle, no smell was reported during the spraying and was found to be operationally acceptable for indoor residual spraying.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Alpha-cypermethrin</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Indoor residual spraying</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Residual efficacy</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kamaraju, Raghavendra</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tiwari, Satyanarayana</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ghosh, Sushanta Kumar</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Valecha, Neena</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Malaria journal</subfield><subfield code="d">London : BioMed Central, 2002</subfield><subfield code="g">14(2015), 1 vom: 29. Mai</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)355986582</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2091229-8</subfield><subfield code="x">1475-2875</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:14</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:29</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-0739-7</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">14</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">29</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Uragayala, Sreehari |
spellingShingle |
Uragayala, Sreehari misc Alpha-cypermethrin misc Indoor residual spraying misc Residual efficacy Small-scale evaluation of the efficacy and residual activity of alpha-cypermethrin WG (250 g AI/kg) for indoor spraying in comparison with alpha-cypermethrin WP (50 g AI/kg) in India |
authorStr |
Uragayala, Sreehari |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)355986582 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
springer |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1475-2875 |
topic_title |
Small-scale evaluation of the efficacy and residual activity of alpha-cypermethrin WG (250 g AI/kg) for indoor spraying in comparison with alpha-cypermethrin WP (50 g AI/kg) in India Alpha-cypermethrin (dpeaa)DE-He213 Indoor residual spraying (dpeaa)DE-He213 Residual efficacy (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
topic |
misc Alpha-cypermethrin misc Indoor residual spraying misc Residual efficacy |
topic_unstemmed |
misc Alpha-cypermethrin misc Indoor residual spraying misc Residual efficacy |
topic_browse |
misc Alpha-cypermethrin misc Indoor residual spraying misc Residual efficacy |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Malaria journal |
hierarchy_parent_id |
355986582 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Malaria journal |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)355986582 (DE-600)2091229-8 |
title |
Small-scale evaluation of the efficacy and residual activity of alpha-cypermethrin WG (250 g AI/kg) for indoor spraying in comparison with alpha-cypermethrin WP (50 g AI/kg) in India |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR028640578 (SPR)s12936-015-0739-7-e |
title_full |
Small-scale evaluation of the efficacy and residual activity of alpha-cypermethrin WG (250 g AI/kg) for indoor spraying in comparison with alpha-cypermethrin WP (50 g AI/kg) in India |
author_sort |
Uragayala, Sreehari |
journal |
Malaria journal |
journalStr |
Malaria journal |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2015 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
author_browse |
Uragayala, Sreehari Kamaraju, Raghavendra Tiwari, Satyanarayana Ghosh, Sushanta Kumar Valecha, Neena |
container_volume |
14 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Uragayala, Sreehari |
doi_str_mv |
10.1186/s12936-015-0739-7 |
title_sort |
small-scale evaluation of the efficacy and residual activity of alpha-cypermethrin wg (250 g ai/kg) for indoor spraying in comparison with alpha-cypermethrin wp (50 g ai/kg) in india |
title_auth |
Small-scale evaluation of the efficacy and residual activity of alpha-cypermethrin WG (250 g AI/kg) for indoor spraying in comparison with alpha-cypermethrin WP (50 g AI/kg) in India |
abstract |
Background Indoor residual spraying (IRS) with different formulations of insecticides is being used for the control of mosquito vectors in many countries. In the present study, residual efficacy and duration of effectiveness of IRS with alpha-cypermethrin WG-SB (250 g AI/$ m^{2} $) formulation was compared with WP formulation (50 g AI/kg) in a small scale (Phase II) field trial. Methods Two dosages, i.e. 20 and 30 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, were used and the efficacy and duration of effectiveness was assessed on alpha-cypermethrin susceptible population of Anopheles stephensi. Four types of surfaces were selected, namely cement wall with distemper coating, cement wall with lime coating, mud wall with lime coating, and brick wall unpainted. Spraying was carried out with Hudson sprayer fitted with control flow valve. Bioassays were carried out at weekly and then fortnightly intervals. Chemical analysis of filter paper samples collected from the sprayed surfaces was done at Walloon Agricultural Research Institute, Gembloux, Belgium. Results Alpha-cypermethrin WG-SB showed residual efficacy (>80 % mortality) for 13–15 weeks for the 20 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage and 13–16 weeks for the 30 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage, whereas alpha-cypermethrin WP showed residual efficacy for 11–15 weeks for the 20 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage and 11–14 weeks for the 30 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage on the surfaces tested. The average of the applied to target dose ratio ranged from 0.89 to 1.17 for alpha-cypermethrin WG-SB at 20 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, 0.83–1.80 for the WG-SB at 30 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, 0.87–1.66 for alpha-cypermethrin WP at 20 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, and 0.68–1.06 for WP at 30 mg AI/$ m^{2} $. No adverse events were reported, either by the spray men or the household inhabitants, during and after the spray operations. Conclusions The results suggest that the dose of WG 30 mg/$ m^{2} $ gave slightly longer effective residual action against malaria vector (16 weeks) on most common indoor surfaces and could be used for effective control of Anopheles mosquitoes. The WG formulation was found to be easy to handle, no smell was reported during the spraying and was found to be operationally acceptable for indoor residual spraying. © Uragayala et al. 2015. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( |
abstractGer |
Background Indoor residual spraying (IRS) with different formulations of insecticides is being used for the control of mosquito vectors in many countries. In the present study, residual efficacy and duration of effectiveness of IRS with alpha-cypermethrin WG-SB (250 g AI/$ m^{2} $) formulation was compared with WP formulation (50 g AI/kg) in a small scale (Phase II) field trial. Methods Two dosages, i.e. 20 and 30 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, were used and the efficacy and duration of effectiveness was assessed on alpha-cypermethrin susceptible population of Anopheles stephensi. Four types of surfaces were selected, namely cement wall with distemper coating, cement wall with lime coating, mud wall with lime coating, and brick wall unpainted. Spraying was carried out with Hudson sprayer fitted with control flow valve. Bioassays were carried out at weekly and then fortnightly intervals. Chemical analysis of filter paper samples collected from the sprayed surfaces was done at Walloon Agricultural Research Institute, Gembloux, Belgium. Results Alpha-cypermethrin WG-SB showed residual efficacy (>80 % mortality) for 13–15 weeks for the 20 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage and 13–16 weeks for the 30 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage, whereas alpha-cypermethrin WP showed residual efficacy for 11–15 weeks for the 20 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage and 11–14 weeks for the 30 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage on the surfaces tested. The average of the applied to target dose ratio ranged from 0.89 to 1.17 for alpha-cypermethrin WG-SB at 20 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, 0.83–1.80 for the WG-SB at 30 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, 0.87–1.66 for alpha-cypermethrin WP at 20 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, and 0.68–1.06 for WP at 30 mg AI/$ m^{2} $. No adverse events were reported, either by the spray men or the household inhabitants, during and after the spray operations. Conclusions The results suggest that the dose of WG 30 mg/$ m^{2} $ gave slightly longer effective residual action against malaria vector (16 weeks) on most common indoor surfaces and could be used for effective control of Anopheles mosquitoes. The WG formulation was found to be easy to handle, no smell was reported during the spraying and was found to be operationally acceptable for indoor residual spraying. © Uragayala et al. 2015. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( |
abstract_unstemmed |
Background Indoor residual spraying (IRS) with different formulations of insecticides is being used for the control of mosquito vectors in many countries. In the present study, residual efficacy and duration of effectiveness of IRS with alpha-cypermethrin WG-SB (250 g AI/$ m^{2} $) formulation was compared with WP formulation (50 g AI/kg) in a small scale (Phase II) field trial. Methods Two dosages, i.e. 20 and 30 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, were used and the efficacy and duration of effectiveness was assessed on alpha-cypermethrin susceptible population of Anopheles stephensi. Four types of surfaces were selected, namely cement wall with distemper coating, cement wall with lime coating, mud wall with lime coating, and brick wall unpainted. Spraying was carried out with Hudson sprayer fitted with control flow valve. Bioassays were carried out at weekly and then fortnightly intervals. Chemical analysis of filter paper samples collected from the sprayed surfaces was done at Walloon Agricultural Research Institute, Gembloux, Belgium. Results Alpha-cypermethrin WG-SB showed residual efficacy (>80 % mortality) for 13–15 weeks for the 20 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage and 13–16 weeks for the 30 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage, whereas alpha-cypermethrin WP showed residual efficacy for 11–15 weeks for the 20 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage and 11–14 weeks for the 30 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage on the surfaces tested. The average of the applied to target dose ratio ranged from 0.89 to 1.17 for alpha-cypermethrin WG-SB at 20 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, 0.83–1.80 for the WG-SB at 30 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, 0.87–1.66 for alpha-cypermethrin WP at 20 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, and 0.68–1.06 for WP at 30 mg AI/$ m^{2} $. No adverse events were reported, either by the spray men or the household inhabitants, during and after the spray operations. Conclusions The results suggest that the dose of WG 30 mg/$ m^{2} $ gave slightly longer effective residual action against malaria vector (16 weeks) on most common indoor surfaces and could be used for effective control of Anopheles mosquitoes. The WG formulation was found to be easy to handle, no smell was reported during the spraying and was found to be operationally acceptable for indoor residual spraying. © Uragayala et al. 2015. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
1 |
title_short |
Small-scale evaluation of the efficacy and residual activity of alpha-cypermethrin WG (250 g AI/kg) for indoor spraying in comparison with alpha-cypermethrin WP (50 g AI/kg) in India |
url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-0739-7 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Kamaraju, Raghavendra Tiwari, Satyanarayana Ghosh, Sushanta Kumar Valecha, Neena |
author2Str |
Kamaraju, Raghavendra Tiwari, Satyanarayana Ghosh, Sushanta Kumar Valecha, Neena |
ppnlink |
355986582 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1186/s12936-015-0739-7 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T20:45:29.567Z |
_version_ |
1803592169759440896 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR028640578</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230520011543.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/s12936-015-0739-7</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR028640578</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s12936-015-0739-7-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Uragayala, Sreehari</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Small-scale evaluation of the efficacy and residual activity of alpha-cypermethrin WG (250 g AI/kg) for indoor spraying in comparison with alpha-cypermethrin WP (50 g AI/kg) in India</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Uragayala et al. 2015. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background Indoor residual spraying (IRS) with different formulations of insecticides is being used for the control of mosquito vectors in many countries. In the present study, residual efficacy and duration of effectiveness of IRS with alpha-cypermethrin WG-SB (250 g AI/$ m^{2} $) formulation was compared with WP formulation (50 g AI/kg) in a small scale (Phase II) field trial. Methods Two dosages, i.e. 20 and 30 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, were used and the efficacy and duration of effectiveness was assessed on alpha-cypermethrin susceptible population of Anopheles stephensi. Four types of surfaces were selected, namely cement wall with distemper coating, cement wall with lime coating, mud wall with lime coating, and brick wall unpainted. Spraying was carried out with Hudson sprayer fitted with control flow valve. Bioassays were carried out at weekly and then fortnightly intervals. Chemical analysis of filter paper samples collected from the sprayed surfaces was done at Walloon Agricultural Research Institute, Gembloux, Belgium. Results Alpha-cypermethrin WG-SB showed residual efficacy (>80 % mortality) for 13–15 weeks for the 20 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage and 13–16 weeks for the 30 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage, whereas alpha-cypermethrin WP showed residual efficacy for 11–15 weeks for the 20 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage and 11–14 weeks for the 30 mg/$ m^{2} $ dosage on the surfaces tested. The average of the applied to target dose ratio ranged from 0.89 to 1.17 for alpha-cypermethrin WG-SB at 20 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, 0.83–1.80 for the WG-SB at 30 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, 0.87–1.66 for alpha-cypermethrin WP at 20 mg AI/$ m^{2} $, and 0.68–1.06 for WP at 30 mg AI/$ m^{2} $. No adverse events were reported, either by the spray men or the household inhabitants, during and after the spray operations. Conclusions The results suggest that the dose of WG 30 mg/$ m^{2} $ gave slightly longer effective residual action against malaria vector (16 weeks) on most common indoor surfaces and could be used for effective control of Anopheles mosquitoes. The WG formulation was found to be easy to handle, no smell was reported during the spraying and was found to be operationally acceptable for indoor residual spraying.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Alpha-cypermethrin</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Indoor residual spraying</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Residual efficacy</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kamaraju, Raghavendra</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tiwari, Satyanarayana</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ghosh, Sushanta Kumar</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Valecha, Neena</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Malaria journal</subfield><subfield code="d">London : BioMed Central, 2002</subfield><subfield code="g">14(2015), 1 vom: 29. Mai</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)355986582</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2091229-8</subfield><subfield code="x">1475-2875</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:14</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:29</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-0739-7</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">14</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">29</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4010277 |