Conservative care with or without manipulative therapy in the management of back and neck pain in Danish children aged 9–15. Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Background Complaints in the musculoskeletal system often start early in life and back and neck pain in children are well-established predictors for similar problems in adulthood. Despite lack of evidence of effectiveness, manipulative therapy is one of the most commonly used treatment modalities fo...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Dissing, Kristina Boe [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2016 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Anmerkung: |
© Dissing et al. 2016 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Chiropractic & osteopathy - London : BioMed Central, 2005, 24(2016), 1 vom: 28. Jan. |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:24 ; year:2016 ; number:1 ; day:28 ; month:01 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1186/s12998-016-0086-y |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
SPR029358604 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | SPR029358604 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230519171927.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 201007s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s12998-016-0086-y |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)SPR029358604 | ||
035 | |a (SPR)s12998-016-0086-y-e | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Dissing, Kristina Boe |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Conservative care with or without manipulative therapy in the management of back and neck pain in Danish children aged 9–15. Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © Dissing et al. 2016 | ||
520 | |a Background Complaints in the musculoskeletal system often start early in life and back and neck pain in children are well-established predictors for similar problems in adulthood. Despite lack of evidence of effectiveness, manipulative therapy is one of the most commonly used treatment modalities for back and neck pain in children. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of manipulative therapy when added to an approach consisting of manual soft tissue treatment, exercises and advice as needed, in children aged 9–15 complaining of back and neck pain. Method The project is nested in the Childhood Health, Activity and Motor Performance School Study, which includes around 1200 children aged 9–15, who were all invited to participate in this randomized controlled trial in case they experienced back and/or neck pain during the two year inclusion period. Parents received text messages (SMS) on a weekly basis inquiring about the child’s musculoskeletal pain. If pain was reported, the child was evaluated for inclusion into the trial and, if eligible, randomized into one of two intervention groups:Pragmatic advice, manual soft tissue treatment and exercisesThe above plus manipulative therapy By the end of data collection 237 children were included in the study. The primary outcome measure is number of recurrences of back and neck pain during the follow-up period (3–27 months). Secondary outcome measures are average duration of complaint time for each episode, total duration of complaint time, global perceived effect after two weeks, and change in pain intensity after 2 weeks. Baseline information includes quality of life, expectations to treatment, expectations to future course, age, gender, social class and physical education at school. Discussion For most common non-traumatic musculoskeletal complaints no standardized and evidence based treatment strategy exists. We want to evaluate the effectiveness of manipulative therapy in addition to an approach consisting of manual soft tissue treatment, exercises and advice as needed, in children aged 9–15 complaining of back and neck pain. To our knowledge this is the first large scale randomized controlled trial investigating the effectiveness of commonly used treatments for back and neck pain in children. Trial registration ClinicalTrials NCT01504698 | ||
650 | 4 | |a Randomized controlled trial |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Children |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Adolescents |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Spinal pain |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Manipulative therapy |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Neck pain |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Back pain |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
700 | 1 | |a Hartvigsen, Jan |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wedderkopp, Niels |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hestbæk, Lise |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Chiropractic & osteopathy |d London : BioMed Central, 2005 |g 24(2016), 1 vom: 28. Jan. |w (DE-627)484836161 |w (DE-600)2185661-8 |x 1746-1340 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:24 |g year:2016 |g number:1 |g day:28 |g month:01 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-016-0086-y |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 24 |j 2016 |e 1 |b 28 |c 01 |
author_variant |
k b d kb kbd j h jh n w nw l h lh |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:17461340:2016----::osraieaeihrihumnpltvteaynhmngmnobcadekannaihhlrngd1suy |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2016 |
publishDate |
2016 |
allfields |
10.1186/s12998-016-0086-y doi (DE-627)SPR029358604 (SPR)s12998-016-0086-y-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Dissing, Kristina Boe verfasserin aut Conservative care with or without manipulative therapy in the management of back and neck pain in Danish children aged 9–15. Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Dissing et al. 2016 Background Complaints in the musculoskeletal system often start early in life and back and neck pain in children are well-established predictors for similar problems in adulthood. Despite lack of evidence of effectiveness, manipulative therapy is one of the most commonly used treatment modalities for back and neck pain in children. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of manipulative therapy when added to an approach consisting of manual soft tissue treatment, exercises and advice as needed, in children aged 9–15 complaining of back and neck pain. Method The project is nested in the Childhood Health, Activity and Motor Performance School Study, which includes around 1200 children aged 9–15, who were all invited to participate in this randomized controlled trial in case they experienced back and/or neck pain during the two year inclusion period. Parents received text messages (SMS) on a weekly basis inquiring about the child’s musculoskeletal pain. If pain was reported, the child was evaluated for inclusion into the trial and, if eligible, randomized into one of two intervention groups:Pragmatic advice, manual soft tissue treatment and exercisesThe above plus manipulative therapy By the end of data collection 237 children were included in the study. The primary outcome measure is number of recurrences of back and neck pain during the follow-up period (3–27 months). Secondary outcome measures are average duration of complaint time for each episode, total duration of complaint time, global perceived effect after two weeks, and change in pain intensity after 2 weeks. Baseline information includes quality of life, expectations to treatment, expectations to future course, age, gender, social class and physical education at school. Discussion For most common non-traumatic musculoskeletal complaints no standardized and evidence based treatment strategy exists. We want to evaluate the effectiveness of manipulative therapy in addition to an approach consisting of manual soft tissue treatment, exercises and advice as needed, in children aged 9–15 complaining of back and neck pain. To our knowledge this is the first large scale randomized controlled trial investigating the effectiveness of commonly used treatments for back and neck pain in children. Trial registration ClinicalTrials NCT01504698 Randomized controlled trial (dpeaa)DE-He213 Children (dpeaa)DE-He213 Adolescents (dpeaa)DE-He213 Spinal pain (dpeaa)DE-He213 Manipulative therapy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Neck pain (dpeaa)DE-He213 Back pain (dpeaa)DE-He213 Hartvigsen, Jan aut Wedderkopp, Niels aut Hestbæk, Lise aut Enthalten in Chiropractic & osteopathy London : BioMed Central, 2005 24(2016), 1 vom: 28. Jan. (DE-627)484836161 (DE-600)2185661-8 1746-1340 nnns volume:24 year:2016 number:1 day:28 month:01 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-016-0086-y kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA AR 24 2016 1 28 01 |
spelling |
10.1186/s12998-016-0086-y doi (DE-627)SPR029358604 (SPR)s12998-016-0086-y-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Dissing, Kristina Boe verfasserin aut Conservative care with or without manipulative therapy in the management of back and neck pain in Danish children aged 9–15. Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Dissing et al. 2016 Background Complaints in the musculoskeletal system often start early in life and back and neck pain in children are well-established predictors for similar problems in adulthood. Despite lack of evidence of effectiveness, manipulative therapy is one of the most commonly used treatment modalities for back and neck pain in children. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of manipulative therapy when added to an approach consisting of manual soft tissue treatment, exercises and advice as needed, in children aged 9–15 complaining of back and neck pain. Method The project is nested in the Childhood Health, Activity and Motor Performance School Study, which includes around 1200 children aged 9–15, who were all invited to participate in this randomized controlled trial in case they experienced back and/or neck pain during the two year inclusion period. Parents received text messages (SMS) on a weekly basis inquiring about the child’s musculoskeletal pain. If pain was reported, the child was evaluated for inclusion into the trial and, if eligible, randomized into one of two intervention groups:Pragmatic advice, manual soft tissue treatment and exercisesThe above plus manipulative therapy By the end of data collection 237 children were included in the study. The primary outcome measure is number of recurrences of back and neck pain during the follow-up period (3–27 months). Secondary outcome measures are average duration of complaint time for each episode, total duration of complaint time, global perceived effect after two weeks, and change in pain intensity after 2 weeks. Baseline information includes quality of life, expectations to treatment, expectations to future course, age, gender, social class and physical education at school. Discussion For most common non-traumatic musculoskeletal complaints no standardized and evidence based treatment strategy exists. We want to evaluate the effectiveness of manipulative therapy in addition to an approach consisting of manual soft tissue treatment, exercises and advice as needed, in children aged 9–15 complaining of back and neck pain. To our knowledge this is the first large scale randomized controlled trial investigating the effectiveness of commonly used treatments for back and neck pain in children. Trial registration ClinicalTrials NCT01504698 Randomized controlled trial (dpeaa)DE-He213 Children (dpeaa)DE-He213 Adolescents (dpeaa)DE-He213 Spinal pain (dpeaa)DE-He213 Manipulative therapy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Neck pain (dpeaa)DE-He213 Back pain (dpeaa)DE-He213 Hartvigsen, Jan aut Wedderkopp, Niels aut Hestbæk, Lise aut Enthalten in Chiropractic & osteopathy London : BioMed Central, 2005 24(2016), 1 vom: 28. Jan. (DE-627)484836161 (DE-600)2185661-8 1746-1340 nnns volume:24 year:2016 number:1 day:28 month:01 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-016-0086-y kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA AR 24 2016 1 28 01 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1186/s12998-016-0086-y doi (DE-627)SPR029358604 (SPR)s12998-016-0086-y-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Dissing, Kristina Boe verfasserin aut Conservative care with or without manipulative therapy in the management of back and neck pain in Danish children aged 9–15. Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Dissing et al. 2016 Background Complaints in the musculoskeletal system often start early in life and back and neck pain in children are well-established predictors for similar problems in adulthood. Despite lack of evidence of effectiveness, manipulative therapy is one of the most commonly used treatment modalities for back and neck pain in children. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of manipulative therapy when added to an approach consisting of manual soft tissue treatment, exercises and advice as needed, in children aged 9–15 complaining of back and neck pain. Method The project is nested in the Childhood Health, Activity and Motor Performance School Study, which includes around 1200 children aged 9–15, who were all invited to participate in this randomized controlled trial in case they experienced back and/or neck pain during the two year inclusion period. Parents received text messages (SMS) on a weekly basis inquiring about the child’s musculoskeletal pain. If pain was reported, the child was evaluated for inclusion into the trial and, if eligible, randomized into one of two intervention groups:Pragmatic advice, manual soft tissue treatment and exercisesThe above plus manipulative therapy By the end of data collection 237 children were included in the study. The primary outcome measure is number of recurrences of back and neck pain during the follow-up period (3–27 months). Secondary outcome measures are average duration of complaint time for each episode, total duration of complaint time, global perceived effect after two weeks, and change in pain intensity after 2 weeks. Baseline information includes quality of life, expectations to treatment, expectations to future course, age, gender, social class and physical education at school. Discussion For most common non-traumatic musculoskeletal complaints no standardized and evidence based treatment strategy exists. We want to evaluate the effectiveness of manipulative therapy in addition to an approach consisting of manual soft tissue treatment, exercises and advice as needed, in children aged 9–15 complaining of back and neck pain. To our knowledge this is the first large scale randomized controlled trial investigating the effectiveness of commonly used treatments for back and neck pain in children. Trial registration ClinicalTrials NCT01504698 Randomized controlled trial (dpeaa)DE-He213 Children (dpeaa)DE-He213 Adolescents (dpeaa)DE-He213 Spinal pain (dpeaa)DE-He213 Manipulative therapy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Neck pain (dpeaa)DE-He213 Back pain (dpeaa)DE-He213 Hartvigsen, Jan aut Wedderkopp, Niels aut Hestbæk, Lise aut Enthalten in Chiropractic & osteopathy London : BioMed Central, 2005 24(2016), 1 vom: 28. Jan. (DE-627)484836161 (DE-600)2185661-8 1746-1340 nnns volume:24 year:2016 number:1 day:28 month:01 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-016-0086-y kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA AR 24 2016 1 28 01 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1186/s12998-016-0086-y doi (DE-627)SPR029358604 (SPR)s12998-016-0086-y-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Dissing, Kristina Boe verfasserin aut Conservative care with or without manipulative therapy in the management of back and neck pain in Danish children aged 9–15. Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Dissing et al. 2016 Background Complaints in the musculoskeletal system often start early in life and back and neck pain in children are well-established predictors for similar problems in adulthood. Despite lack of evidence of effectiveness, manipulative therapy is one of the most commonly used treatment modalities for back and neck pain in children. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of manipulative therapy when added to an approach consisting of manual soft tissue treatment, exercises and advice as needed, in children aged 9–15 complaining of back and neck pain. Method The project is nested in the Childhood Health, Activity and Motor Performance School Study, which includes around 1200 children aged 9–15, who were all invited to participate in this randomized controlled trial in case they experienced back and/or neck pain during the two year inclusion period. Parents received text messages (SMS) on a weekly basis inquiring about the child’s musculoskeletal pain. If pain was reported, the child was evaluated for inclusion into the trial and, if eligible, randomized into one of two intervention groups:Pragmatic advice, manual soft tissue treatment and exercisesThe above plus manipulative therapy By the end of data collection 237 children were included in the study. The primary outcome measure is number of recurrences of back and neck pain during the follow-up period (3–27 months). Secondary outcome measures are average duration of complaint time for each episode, total duration of complaint time, global perceived effect after two weeks, and change in pain intensity after 2 weeks. Baseline information includes quality of life, expectations to treatment, expectations to future course, age, gender, social class and physical education at school. Discussion For most common non-traumatic musculoskeletal complaints no standardized and evidence based treatment strategy exists. We want to evaluate the effectiveness of manipulative therapy in addition to an approach consisting of manual soft tissue treatment, exercises and advice as needed, in children aged 9–15 complaining of back and neck pain. To our knowledge this is the first large scale randomized controlled trial investigating the effectiveness of commonly used treatments for back and neck pain in children. Trial registration ClinicalTrials NCT01504698 Randomized controlled trial (dpeaa)DE-He213 Children (dpeaa)DE-He213 Adolescents (dpeaa)DE-He213 Spinal pain (dpeaa)DE-He213 Manipulative therapy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Neck pain (dpeaa)DE-He213 Back pain (dpeaa)DE-He213 Hartvigsen, Jan aut Wedderkopp, Niels aut Hestbæk, Lise aut Enthalten in Chiropractic & osteopathy London : BioMed Central, 2005 24(2016), 1 vom: 28. Jan. (DE-627)484836161 (DE-600)2185661-8 1746-1340 nnns volume:24 year:2016 number:1 day:28 month:01 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-016-0086-y kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA AR 24 2016 1 28 01 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1186/s12998-016-0086-y doi (DE-627)SPR029358604 (SPR)s12998-016-0086-y-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Dissing, Kristina Boe verfasserin aut Conservative care with or without manipulative therapy in the management of back and neck pain in Danish children aged 9–15. Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Dissing et al. 2016 Background Complaints in the musculoskeletal system often start early in life and back and neck pain in children are well-established predictors for similar problems in adulthood. Despite lack of evidence of effectiveness, manipulative therapy is one of the most commonly used treatment modalities for back and neck pain in children. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of manipulative therapy when added to an approach consisting of manual soft tissue treatment, exercises and advice as needed, in children aged 9–15 complaining of back and neck pain. Method The project is nested in the Childhood Health, Activity and Motor Performance School Study, which includes around 1200 children aged 9–15, who were all invited to participate in this randomized controlled trial in case they experienced back and/or neck pain during the two year inclusion period. Parents received text messages (SMS) on a weekly basis inquiring about the child’s musculoskeletal pain. If pain was reported, the child was evaluated for inclusion into the trial and, if eligible, randomized into one of two intervention groups:Pragmatic advice, manual soft tissue treatment and exercisesThe above plus manipulative therapy By the end of data collection 237 children were included in the study. The primary outcome measure is number of recurrences of back and neck pain during the follow-up period (3–27 months). Secondary outcome measures are average duration of complaint time for each episode, total duration of complaint time, global perceived effect after two weeks, and change in pain intensity after 2 weeks. Baseline information includes quality of life, expectations to treatment, expectations to future course, age, gender, social class and physical education at school. Discussion For most common non-traumatic musculoskeletal complaints no standardized and evidence based treatment strategy exists. We want to evaluate the effectiveness of manipulative therapy in addition to an approach consisting of manual soft tissue treatment, exercises and advice as needed, in children aged 9–15 complaining of back and neck pain. To our knowledge this is the first large scale randomized controlled trial investigating the effectiveness of commonly used treatments for back and neck pain in children. Trial registration ClinicalTrials NCT01504698 Randomized controlled trial (dpeaa)DE-He213 Children (dpeaa)DE-He213 Adolescents (dpeaa)DE-He213 Spinal pain (dpeaa)DE-He213 Manipulative therapy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Neck pain (dpeaa)DE-He213 Back pain (dpeaa)DE-He213 Hartvigsen, Jan aut Wedderkopp, Niels aut Hestbæk, Lise aut Enthalten in Chiropractic & osteopathy London : BioMed Central, 2005 24(2016), 1 vom: 28. Jan. (DE-627)484836161 (DE-600)2185661-8 1746-1340 nnns volume:24 year:2016 number:1 day:28 month:01 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-016-0086-y kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA AR 24 2016 1 28 01 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Chiropractic & osteopathy 24(2016), 1 vom: 28. Jan. volume:24 year:2016 number:1 day:28 month:01 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Chiropractic & osteopathy 24(2016), 1 vom: 28. Jan. volume:24 year:2016 number:1 day:28 month:01 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Randomized controlled trial Children Adolescents Spinal pain Manipulative therapy Neck pain Back pain |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Chiropractic & osteopathy |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Dissing, Kristina Boe @@aut@@ Hartvigsen, Jan @@aut@@ Wedderkopp, Niels @@aut@@ Hestbæk, Lise @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-28T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
484836161 |
id |
SPR029358604 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR029358604</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519171927.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/s12998-016-0086-y</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR029358604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s12998-016-0086-y-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dissing, Kristina Boe</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Conservative care with or without manipulative therapy in the management of back and neck pain in Danish children aged 9–15. Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Dissing et al. 2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background Complaints in the musculoskeletal system often start early in life and back and neck pain in children are well-established predictors for similar problems in adulthood. Despite lack of evidence of effectiveness, manipulative therapy is one of the most commonly used treatment modalities for back and neck pain in children. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of manipulative therapy when added to an approach consisting of manual soft tissue treatment, exercises and advice as needed, in children aged 9–15 complaining of back and neck pain. Method The project is nested in the Childhood Health, Activity and Motor Performance School Study, which includes around 1200 children aged 9–15, who were all invited to participate in this randomized controlled trial in case they experienced back and/or neck pain during the two year inclusion period. Parents received text messages (SMS) on a weekly basis inquiring about the child’s musculoskeletal pain. If pain was reported, the child was evaluated for inclusion into the trial and, if eligible, randomized into one of two intervention groups:Pragmatic advice, manual soft tissue treatment and exercisesThe above plus manipulative therapy By the end of data collection 237 children were included in the study. The primary outcome measure is number of recurrences of back and neck pain during the follow-up period (3–27 months). Secondary outcome measures are average duration of complaint time for each episode, total duration of complaint time, global perceived effect after two weeks, and change in pain intensity after 2 weeks. Baseline information includes quality of life, expectations to treatment, expectations to future course, age, gender, social class and physical education at school. Discussion For most common non-traumatic musculoskeletal complaints no standardized and evidence based treatment strategy exists. We want to evaluate the effectiveness of manipulative therapy in addition to an approach consisting of manual soft tissue treatment, exercises and advice as needed, in children aged 9–15 complaining of back and neck pain. To our knowledge this is the first large scale randomized controlled trial investigating the effectiveness of commonly used treatments for back and neck pain in children. Trial registration ClinicalTrials NCT01504698</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Randomized controlled trial</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Children</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Adolescents</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Spinal pain</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Manipulative therapy</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Neck pain</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Back pain</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hartvigsen, Jan</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wedderkopp, Niels</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hestbæk, Lise</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Chiropractic & osteopathy</subfield><subfield code="d">London : BioMed Central, 2005</subfield><subfield code="g">24(2016), 1 vom: 28. Jan.</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)484836161</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2185661-8</subfield><subfield code="x">1746-1340</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:24</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:28</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-016-0086-y</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">24</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">28</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Dissing, Kristina Boe |
spellingShingle |
Dissing, Kristina Boe misc Randomized controlled trial misc Children misc Adolescents misc Spinal pain misc Manipulative therapy misc Neck pain misc Back pain Conservative care with or without manipulative therapy in the management of back and neck pain in Danish children aged 9–15. Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
authorStr |
Dissing, Kristina Boe |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)484836161 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut |
collection |
springer |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1746-1340 |
topic_title |
Conservative care with or without manipulative therapy in the management of back and neck pain in Danish children aged 9–15. Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Randomized controlled trial (dpeaa)DE-He213 Children (dpeaa)DE-He213 Adolescents (dpeaa)DE-He213 Spinal pain (dpeaa)DE-He213 Manipulative therapy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Neck pain (dpeaa)DE-He213 Back pain (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
topic |
misc Randomized controlled trial misc Children misc Adolescents misc Spinal pain misc Manipulative therapy misc Neck pain misc Back pain |
topic_unstemmed |
misc Randomized controlled trial misc Children misc Adolescents misc Spinal pain misc Manipulative therapy misc Neck pain misc Back pain |
topic_browse |
misc Randomized controlled trial misc Children misc Adolescents misc Spinal pain misc Manipulative therapy misc Neck pain misc Back pain |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Chiropractic & osteopathy |
hierarchy_parent_id |
484836161 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Chiropractic & osteopathy |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)484836161 (DE-600)2185661-8 |
title |
Conservative care with or without manipulative therapy in the management of back and neck pain in Danish children aged 9–15. Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR029358604 (SPR)s12998-016-0086-y-e |
title_full |
Conservative care with or without manipulative therapy in the management of back and neck pain in Danish children aged 9–15. Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
author_sort |
Dissing, Kristina Boe |
journal |
Chiropractic & osteopathy |
journalStr |
Chiropractic & osteopathy |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2016 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
author_browse |
Dissing, Kristina Boe Hartvigsen, Jan Wedderkopp, Niels Hestbæk, Lise |
container_volume |
24 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Dissing, Kristina Boe |
doi_str_mv |
10.1186/s12998-016-0086-y |
title_sort |
conservative care with or without manipulative therapy in the management of back and neck pain in danish children aged 9–15. study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_auth |
Conservative care with or without manipulative therapy in the management of back and neck pain in Danish children aged 9–15. Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
abstract |
Background Complaints in the musculoskeletal system often start early in life and back and neck pain in children are well-established predictors for similar problems in adulthood. Despite lack of evidence of effectiveness, manipulative therapy is one of the most commonly used treatment modalities for back and neck pain in children. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of manipulative therapy when added to an approach consisting of manual soft tissue treatment, exercises and advice as needed, in children aged 9–15 complaining of back and neck pain. Method The project is nested in the Childhood Health, Activity and Motor Performance School Study, which includes around 1200 children aged 9–15, who were all invited to participate in this randomized controlled trial in case they experienced back and/or neck pain during the two year inclusion period. Parents received text messages (SMS) on a weekly basis inquiring about the child’s musculoskeletal pain. If pain was reported, the child was evaluated for inclusion into the trial and, if eligible, randomized into one of two intervention groups:Pragmatic advice, manual soft tissue treatment and exercisesThe above plus manipulative therapy By the end of data collection 237 children were included in the study. The primary outcome measure is number of recurrences of back and neck pain during the follow-up period (3–27 months). Secondary outcome measures are average duration of complaint time for each episode, total duration of complaint time, global perceived effect after two weeks, and change in pain intensity after 2 weeks. Baseline information includes quality of life, expectations to treatment, expectations to future course, age, gender, social class and physical education at school. Discussion For most common non-traumatic musculoskeletal complaints no standardized and evidence based treatment strategy exists. We want to evaluate the effectiveness of manipulative therapy in addition to an approach consisting of manual soft tissue treatment, exercises and advice as needed, in children aged 9–15 complaining of back and neck pain. To our knowledge this is the first large scale randomized controlled trial investigating the effectiveness of commonly used treatments for back and neck pain in children. Trial registration ClinicalTrials NCT01504698 © Dissing et al. 2016 |
abstractGer |
Background Complaints in the musculoskeletal system often start early in life and back and neck pain in children are well-established predictors for similar problems in adulthood. Despite lack of evidence of effectiveness, manipulative therapy is one of the most commonly used treatment modalities for back and neck pain in children. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of manipulative therapy when added to an approach consisting of manual soft tissue treatment, exercises and advice as needed, in children aged 9–15 complaining of back and neck pain. Method The project is nested in the Childhood Health, Activity and Motor Performance School Study, which includes around 1200 children aged 9–15, who were all invited to participate in this randomized controlled trial in case they experienced back and/or neck pain during the two year inclusion period. Parents received text messages (SMS) on a weekly basis inquiring about the child’s musculoskeletal pain. If pain was reported, the child was evaluated for inclusion into the trial and, if eligible, randomized into one of two intervention groups:Pragmatic advice, manual soft tissue treatment and exercisesThe above plus manipulative therapy By the end of data collection 237 children were included in the study. The primary outcome measure is number of recurrences of back and neck pain during the follow-up period (3–27 months). Secondary outcome measures are average duration of complaint time for each episode, total duration of complaint time, global perceived effect after two weeks, and change in pain intensity after 2 weeks. Baseline information includes quality of life, expectations to treatment, expectations to future course, age, gender, social class and physical education at school. Discussion For most common non-traumatic musculoskeletal complaints no standardized and evidence based treatment strategy exists. We want to evaluate the effectiveness of manipulative therapy in addition to an approach consisting of manual soft tissue treatment, exercises and advice as needed, in children aged 9–15 complaining of back and neck pain. To our knowledge this is the first large scale randomized controlled trial investigating the effectiveness of commonly used treatments for back and neck pain in children. Trial registration ClinicalTrials NCT01504698 © Dissing et al. 2016 |
abstract_unstemmed |
Background Complaints in the musculoskeletal system often start early in life and back and neck pain in children are well-established predictors for similar problems in adulthood. Despite lack of evidence of effectiveness, manipulative therapy is one of the most commonly used treatment modalities for back and neck pain in children. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of manipulative therapy when added to an approach consisting of manual soft tissue treatment, exercises and advice as needed, in children aged 9–15 complaining of back and neck pain. Method The project is nested in the Childhood Health, Activity and Motor Performance School Study, which includes around 1200 children aged 9–15, who were all invited to participate in this randomized controlled trial in case they experienced back and/or neck pain during the two year inclusion period. Parents received text messages (SMS) on a weekly basis inquiring about the child’s musculoskeletal pain. If pain was reported, the child was evaluated for inclusion into the trial and, if eligible, randomized into one of two intervention groups:Pragmatic advice, manual soft tissue treatment and exercisesThe above plus manipulative therapy By the end of data collection 237 children were included in the study. The primary outcome measure is number of recurrences of back and neck pain during the follow-up period (3–27 months). Secondary outcome measures are average duration of complaint time for each episode, total duration of complaint time, global perceived effect after two weeks, and change in pain intensity after 2 weeks. Baseline information includes quality of life, expectations to treatment, expectations to future course, age, gender, social class and physical education at school. Discussion For most common non-traumatic musculoskeletal complaints no standardized and evidence based treatment strategy exists. We want to evaluate the effectiveness of manipulative therapy in addition to an approach consisting of manual soft tissue treatment, exercises and advice as needed, in children aged 9–15 complaining of back and neck pain. To our knowledge this is the first large scale randomized controlled trial investigating the effectiveness of commonly used treatments for back and neck pain in children. Trial registration ClinicalTrials NCT01504698 © Dissing et al. 2016 |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA |
container_issue |
1 |
title_short |
Conservative care with or without manipulative therapy in the management of back and neck pain in Danish children aged 9–15. Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-016-0086-y |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Hartvigsen, Jan Wedderkopp, Niels Hestbæk, Lise |
author2Str |
Hartvigsen, Jan Wedderkopp, Niels Hestbæk, Lise |
ppnlink |
484836161 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1186/s12998-016-0086-y |
up_date |
2024-07-04T00:38:08.398Z |
_version_ |
1803606806651469824 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR029358604</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519171927.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/s12998-016-0086-y</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR029358604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s12998-016-0086-y-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dissing, Kristina Boe</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Conservative care with or without manipulative therapy in the management of back and neck pain in Danish children aged 9–15. Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Dissing et al. 2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background Complaints in the musculoskeletal system often start early in life and back and neck pain in children are well-established predictors for similar problems in adulthood. Despite lack of evidence of effectiveness, manipulative therapy is one of the most commonly used treatment modalities for back and neck pain in children. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of manipulative therapy when added to an approach consisting of manual soft tissue treatment, exercises and advice as needed, in children aged 9–15 complaining of back and neck pain. Method The project is nested in the Childhood Health, Activity and Motor Performance School Study, which includes around 1200 children aged 9–15, who were all invited to participate in this randomized controlled trial in case they experienced back and/or neck pain during the two year inclusion period. Parents received text messages (SMS) on a weekly basis inquiring about the child’s musculoskeletal pain. If pain was reported, the child was evaluated for inclusion into the trial and, if eligible, randomized into one of two intervention groups:Pragmatic advice, manual soft tissue treatment and exercisesThe above plus manipulative therapy By the end of data collection 237 children were included in the study. The primary outcome measure is number of recurrences of back and neck pain during the follow-up period (3–27 months). Secondary outcome measures are average duration of complaint time for each episode, total duration of complaint time, global perceived effect after two weeks, and change in pain intensity after 2 weeks. Baseline information includes quality of life, expectations to treatment, expectations to future course, age, gender, social class and physical education at school. Discussion For most common non-traumatic musculoskeletal complaints no standardized and evidence based treatment strategy exists. We want to evaluate the effectiveness of manipulative therapy in addition to an approach consisting of manual soft tissue treatment, exercises and advice as needed, in children aged 9–15 complaining of back and neck pain. To our knowledge this is the first large scale randomized controlled trial investigating the effectiveness of commonly used treatments for back and neck pain in children. Trial registration ClinicalTrials NCT01504698</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Randomized controlled trial</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Children</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Adolescents</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Spinal pain</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Manipulative therapy</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Neck pain</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Back pain</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hartvigsen, Jan</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wedderkopp, Niels</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hestbæk, Lise</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Chiropractic & osteopathy</subfield><subfield code="d">London : BioMed Central, 2005</subfield><subfield code="g">24(2016), 1 vom: 28. Jan.</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)484836161</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2185661-8</subfield><subfield code="x">1746-1340</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:24</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:28</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-016-0086-y</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">24</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">28</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3972797 |