Differential routes of carboplatin administration influence lymphocyte apoptosis in retroperitoneal lymph nodes

Abstract We aimed to investigate carboplatin distribution in retroperitoneal lymph nodes and its effect on lymphocyte apoptosis following intravenous (IV), intra-arterial (IA), and retroperitoneal (RP) administration. Sixty-three healthy female canines were randomly assigned as IV, IA, or RP adminis...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Huang, Yong-Wen [verfasserIn] Zeng, Zheng Li, Su Liu, Ji-Hong

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2012

Schlagwörter:	Intraveneous Gynecological cancer Ovarian Endometrial Intra-arterial

Anmerkung:	© International Society of Oncology and BioMarkers (ISOBM) 2012

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Tumor biology - Amsterdam : IOS Press, 1987, 33(2012), 6 vom: 29. Juli, Seite 2053-2059
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:33 ; year:2012 ; number:6 ; day:29 ; month:07 ; pages:2053-2059

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.1007/s13277-012-0464-6

Katalog-ID:	SPR031125786

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	SPR031125786
003	DE-627
005	20230519092835.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	201007s2012 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1007/s13277-012-0464-6 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)SPR031125786
035			\|a (SPR)s13277-012-0464-6-e
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
100	1		\|a Huang, Yong-Wen \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Differential routes of carboplatin administration influence lymphocyte apoptosis in retroperitoneal lymph nodes
264		1	\|c 2012
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
500			\|a © International Society of Oncology and BioMarkers (ISOBM) 2012
520			\|a Abstract We aimed to investigate carboplatin distribution in retroperitoneal lymph nodes and its effect on lymphocyte apoptosis following intravenous (IV), intra-arterial (IA), and retroperitoneal (RP) administration. Sixty-three healthy female canines were randomly assigned as IV, IA, or RP administration of carboplatin. At 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, and 72 h after carboplatin treatment, retroperitoneal lymph nodes (n = 6 at each time point) were collected and high-performance liquid chromatography was employed to measure the carboplatin content. The differences in carboplatin pharmacokinetics of the three administration routes were compared. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) was carried out to measure the lymphocyte apoptosis of the retroperitoneal lymphocytes. The peak concentration of carboplatin in plasma following IV administration was the highest among all approaches; as to the peak time, RP administration was longer than the other two administrations. Concentration for carboplatin in the retroperitoneal lymph node was highest following IA administration at early time points, but at higher time points, concentration was significantly higher following RP administration. Penetration of carboplatin into the retroperitoneal space was higher following RP administration. Following RP administration, the level of apoptotic lymphocytes in the retroperitoneal lymph nodes was significantly greater than either IV or IA. Following RP administration of carboplatin, the concentration, area under the curve of carboplatin and the number of apoptotic lymphocytes were significantly higher than those following IV and IA administration. This suggests that RP administration of carboplatin is beneficial for the treatment of retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis.
650		4	\|a Intraveneous \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Gynecological cancer \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Ovarian \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Endometrial \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Intra-arterial \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
700	1		\|a Zeng, Zheng \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Li, Su \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Liu, Ji-Hong \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Tumor biology \|d Amsterdam : IOS Press, 1987 \|g 33(2012), 6 vom: 29. Juli, Seite 2053-2059 \|w (DE-627)300897855 \|w (DE-600)1483579-4 \|x 1423-0380 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:33 \|g year:2012 \|g number:6 \|g day:29 \|g month:07 \|g pages:2053-2059
856	4	0	\|u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13277-012-0464-6 \|z lizenzpflichtig \|3 Volltext
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_SPRINGER
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHA
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_32
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_138
912			\|a GBV_ILN_150
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2001
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2007
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2015
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2021
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2025
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2026
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2031
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2034
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2038
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2039
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2044
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2059
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2064
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2065
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2068
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2070
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2086
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2106
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2108
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2113
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2116
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2118
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2119
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2122
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2129
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2143
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2144
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2147
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2148
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2153
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2188
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2190
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2232
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4242
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4246
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4251
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4328
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4333
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 33 \|j 2012 \|e 6 \|b 29 \|c 07 \|h 2053-2059

Indexfelder

author_variant	y w h ywh z z zz s l sl j h l jhl
matchkey_str	article:14230380:2012----::ifrnilotsfabpaiamnsrtoifuneypoyeppoii
hierarchy_sort_str	2012
publishDate	2012
allfields	10.1007/s13277-012-0464-6 doi (DE-627)SPR031125786 (SPR)s13277-012-0464-6-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Huang, Yong-Wen verfasserin aut Differential routes of carboplatin administration influence lymphocyte apoptosis in retroperitoneal lymph nodes 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © International Society of Oncology and BioMarkers (ISOBM) 2012 Abstract We aimed to investigate carboplatin distribution in retroperitoneal lymph nodes and its effect on lymphocyte apoptosis following intravenous (IV), intra-arterial (IA), and retroperitoneal (RP) administration. Sixty-three healthy female canines were randomly assigned as IV, IA, or RP administration of carboplatin. At 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, and 72 h after carboplatin treatment, retroperitoneal lymph nodes (n = 6 at each time point) were collected and high-performance liquid chromatography was employed to measure the carboplatin content. The differences in carboplatin pharmacokinetics of the three administration routes were compared. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) was carried out to measure the lymphocyte apoptosis of the retroperitoneal lymphocytes. The peak concentration of carboplatin in plasma following IV administration was the highest among all approaches; as to the peak time, RP administration was longer than the other two administrations. Concentration for carboplatin in the retroperitoneal lymph node was highest following IA administration at early time points, but at higher time points, concentration was significantly higher following RP administration. Penetration of carboplatin into the retroperitoneal space was higher following RP administration. Following RP administration, the level of apoptotic lymphocytes in the retroperitoneal lymph nodes was significantly greater than either IV or IA. Following RP administration of carboplatin, the concentration, area under the curve of carboplatin and the number of apoptotic lymphocytes were significantly higher than those following IV and IA administration. This suggests that RP administration of carboplatin is beneficial for the treatment of retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis. Intraveneous (dpeaa)DE-He213 Gynecological cancer (dpeaa)DE-He213 Ovarian (dpeaa)DE-He213 Endometrial (dpeaa)DE-He213 Intra-arterial (dpeaa)DE-He213 Zeng, Zheng aut Li, Su aut Liu, Ji-Hong aut Enthalten in Tumor biology Amsterdam : IOS Press, 1987 33(2012), 6 vom: 29. Juli, Seite 2053-2059 (DE-627)300897855 (DE-600)1483579-4 1423-0380 nnns volume:33 year:2012 number:6 day:29 month:07 pages:2053-2059 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13277-012-0464-6 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4338 AR 33 2012 6 29 07 2053-2059
spelling	10.1007/s13277-012-0464-6 doi (DE-627)SPR031125786 (SPR)s13277-012-0464-6-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Huang, Yong-Wen verfasserin aut Differential routes of carboplatin administration influence lymphocyte apoptosis in retroperitoneal lymph nodes 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © International Society of Oncology and BioMarkers (ISOBM) 2012 Abstract We aimed to investigate carboplatin distribution in retroperitoneal lymph nodes and its effect on lymphocyte apoptosis following intravenous (IV), intra-arterial (IA), and retroperitoneal (RP) administration. Sixty-three healthy female canines were randomly assigned as IV, IA, or RP administration of carboplatin. At 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, and 72 h after carboplatin treatment, retroperitoneal lymph nodes (n = 6 at each time point) were collected and high-performance liquid chromatography was employed to measure the carboplatin content. The differences in carboplatin pharmacokinetics of the three administration routes were compared. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) was carried out to measure the lymphocyte apoptosis of the retroperitoneal lymphocytes. The peak concentration of carboplatin in plasma following IV administration was the highest among all approaches; as to the peak time, RP administration was longer than the other two administrations. Concentration for carboplatin in the retroperitoneal lymph node was highest following IA administration at early time points, but at higher time points, concentration was significantly higher following RP administration. Penetration of carboplatin into the retroperitoneal space was higher following RP administration. Following RP administration, the level of apoptotic lymphocytes in the retroperitoneal lymph nodes was significantly greater than either IV or IA. Following RP administration of carboplatin, the concentration, area under the curve of carboplatin and the number of apoptotic lymphocytes were significantly higher than those following IV and IA administration. This suggests that RP administration of carboplatin is beneficial for the treatment of retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis. Intraveneous (dpeaa)DE-He213 Gynecological cancer (dpeaa)DE-He213 Ovarian (dpeaa)DE-He213 Endometrial (dpeaa)DE-He213 Intra-arterial (dpeaa)DE-He213 Zeng, Zheng aut Li, Su aut Liu, Ji-Hong aut Enthalten in Tumor biology Amsterdam : IOS Press, 1987 33(2012), 6 vom: 29. Juli, Seite 2053-2059 (DE-627)300897855 (DE-600)1483579-4 1423-0380 nnns volume:33 year:2012 number:6 day:29 month:07 pages:2053-2059 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13277-012-0464-6 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4338 AR 33 2012 6 29 07 2053-2059
allfields_unstemmed	10.1007/s13277-012-0464-6 doi (DE-627)SPR031125786 (SPR)s13277-012-0464-6-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Huang, Yong-Wen verfasserin aut Differential routes of carboplatin administration influence lymphocyte apoptosis in retroperitoneal lymph nodes 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © International Society of Oncology and BioMarkers (ISOBM) 2012 Abstract We aimed to investigate carboplatin distribution in retroperitoneal lymph nodes and its effect on lymphocyte apoptosis following intravenous (IV), intra-arterial (IA), and retroperitoneal (RP) administration. Sixty-three healthy female canines were randomly assigned as IV, IA, or RP administration of carboplatin. At 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, and 72 h after carboplatin treatment, retroperitoneal lymph nodes (n = 6 at each time point) were collected and high-performance liquid chromatography was employed to measure the carboplatin content. The differences in carboplatin pharmacokinetics of the three administration routes were compared. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) was carried out to measure the lymphocyte apoptosis of the retroperitoneal lymphocytes. The peak concentration of carboplatin in plasma following IV administration was the highest among all approaches; as to the peak time, RP administration was longer than the other two administrations. Concentration for carboplatin in the retroperitoneal lymph node was highest following IA administration at early time points, but at higher time points, concentration was significantly higher following RP administration. Penetration of carboplatin into the retroperitoneal space was higher following RP administration. Following RP administration, the level of apoptotic lymphocytes in the retroperitoneal lymph nodes was significantly greater than either IV or IA. Following RP administration of carboplatin, the concentration, area under the curve of carboplatin and the number of apoptotic lymphocytes were significantly higher than those following IV and IA administration. This suggests that RP administration of carboplatin is beneficial for the treatment of retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis. Intraveneous (dpeaa)DE-He213 Gynecological cancer (dpeaa)DE-He213 Ovarian (dpeaa)DE-He213 Endometrial (dpeaa)DE-He213 Intra-arterial (dpeaa)DE-He213 Zeng, Zheng aut Li, Su aut Liu, Ji-Hong aut Enthalten in Tumor biology Amsterdam : IOS Press, 1987 33(2012), 6 vom: 29. Juli, Seite 2053-2059 (DE-627)300897855 (DE-600)1483579-4 1423-0380 nnns volume:33 year:2012 number:6 day:29 month:07 pages:2053-2059 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13277-012-0464-6 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4338 AR 33 2012 6 29 07 2053-2059
allfieldsGer	10.1007/s13277-012-0464-6 doi (DE-627)SPR031125786 (SPR)s13277-012-0464-6-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Huang, Yong-Wen verfasserin aut Differential routes of carboplatin administration influence lymphocyte apoptosis in retroperitoneal lymph nodes 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © International Society of Oncology and BioMarkers (ISOBM) 2012 Abstract We aimed to investigate carboplatin distribution in retroperitoneal lymph nodes and its effect on lymphocyte apoptosis following intravenous (IV), intra-arterial (IA), and retroperitoneal (RP) administration. Sixty-three healthy female canines were randomly assigned as IV, IA, or RP administration of carboplatin. At 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, and 72 h after carboplatin treatment, retroperitoneal lymph nodes (n = 6 at each time point) were collected and high-performance liquid chromatography was employed to measure the carboplatin content. The differences in carboplatin pharmacokinetics of the three administration routes were compared. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) was carried out to measure the lymphocyte apoptosis of the retroperitoneal lymphocytes. The peak concentration of carboplatin in plasma following IV administration was the highest among all approaches; as to the peak time, RP administration was longer than the other two administrations. Concentration for carboplatin in the retroperitoneal lymph node was highest following IA administration at early time points, but at higher time points, concentration was significantly higher following RP administration. Penetration of carboplatin into the retroperitoneal space was higher following RP administration. Following RP administration, the level of apoptotic lymphocytes in the retroperitoneal lymph nodes was significantly greater than either IV or IA. Following RP administration of carboplatin, the concentration, area under the curve of carboplatin and the number of apoptotic lymphocytes were significantly higher than those following IV and IA administration. This suggests that RP administration of carboplatin is beneficial for the treatment of retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis. Intraveneous (dpeaa)DE-He213 Gynecological cancer (dpeaa)DE-He213 Ovarian (dpeaa)DE-He213 Endometrial (dpeaa)DE-He213 Intra-arterial (dpeaa)DE-He213 Zeng, Zheng aut Li, Su aut Liu, Ji-Hong aut Enthalten in Tumor biology Amsterdam : IOS Press, 1987 33(2012), 6 vom: 29. Juli, Seite 2053-2059 (DE-627)300897855 (DE-600)1483579-4 1423-0380 nnns volume:33 year:2012 number:6 day:29 month:07 pages:2053-2059 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13277-012-0464-6 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4338 AR 33 2012 6 29 07 2053-2059
allfieldsSound	10.1007/s13277-012-0464-6 doi (DE-627)SPR031125786 (SPR)s13277-012-0464-6-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Huang, Yong-Wen verfasserin aut Differential routes of carboplatin administration influence lymphocyte apoptosis in retroperitoneal lymph nodes 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © International Society of Oncology and BioMarkers (ISOBM) 2012 Abstract We aimed to investigate carboplatin distribution in retroperitoneal lymph nodes and its effect on lymphocyte apoptosis following intravenous (IV), intra-arterial (IA), and retroperitoneal (RP) administration. Sixty-three healthy female canines were randomly assigned as IV, IA, or RP administration of carboplatin. At 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, and 72 h after carboplatin treatment, retroperitoneal lymph nodes (n = 6 at each time point) were collected and high-performance liquid chromatography was employed to measure the carboplatin content. The differences in carboplatin pharmacokinetics of the three administration routes were compared. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) was carried out to measure the lymphocyte apoptosis of the retroperitoneal lymphocytes. The peak concentration of carboplatin in plasma following IV administration was the highest among all approaches; as to the peak time, RP administration was longer than the other two administrations. Concentration for carboplatin in the retroperitoneal lymph node was highest following IA administration at early time points, but at higher time points, concentration was significantly higher following RP administration. Penetration of carboplatin into the retroperitoneal space was higher following RP administration. Following RP administration, the level of apoptotic lymphocytes in the retroperitoneal lymph nodes was significantly greater than either IV or IA. Following RP administration of carboplatin, the concentration, area under the curve of carboplatin and the number of apoptotic lymphocytes were significantly higher than those following IV and IA administration. This suggests that RP administration of carboplatin is beneficial for the treatment of retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis. Intraveneous (dpeaa)DE-He213 Gynecological cancer (dpeaa)DE-He213 Ovarian (dpeaa)DE-He213 Endometrial (dpeaa)DE-He213 Intra-arterial (dpeaa)DE-He213 Zeng, Zheng aut Li, Su aut Liu, Ji-Hong aut Enthalten in Tumor biology Amsterdam : IOS Press, 1987 33(2012), 6 vom: 29. Juli, Seite 2053-2059 (DE-627)300897855 (DE-600)1483579-4 1423-0380 nnns volume:33 year:2012 number:6 day:29 month:07 pages:2053-2059 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13277-012-0464-6 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4338 AR 33 2012 6 29 07 2053-2059
language	English
source	Enthalten in Tumor biology 33(2012), 6 vom: 29. Juli, Seite 2053-2059 volume:33 year:2012 number:6 day:29 month:07 pages:2053-2059
sourceStr	Enthalten in Tumor biology 33(2012), 6 vom: 29. Juli, Seite 2053-2059 volume:33 year:2012 number:6 day:29 month:07 pages:2053-2059
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Intraveneous Gynecological cancer Ovarian Endometrial Intra-arterial
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	Tumor biology
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Huang, Yong-Wen @@aut@@ Zeng, Zheng @@aut@@ Li, Su @@aut@@ Liu, Ji-Hong @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2012-07-29T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	300897855
id	SPR031125786
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR031125786</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519092835.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2012 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s13277-012-0464-6</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR031125786</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s13277-012-0464-6-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Huang, Yong-Wen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Differential routes of carboplatin administration influence lymphocyte apoptosis in retroperitoneal lymph nodes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© International Society of Oncology and BioMarkers (ISOBM) 2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract We aimed to investigate carboplatin distribution in retroperitoneal lymph nodes and its effect on lymphocyte apoptosis following intravenous (IV), intra-arterial (IA), and retroperitoneal (RP) administration. Sixty-three healthy female canines were randomly assigned as IV, IA, or RP administration of carboplatin. At 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, and 72 h after carboplatin treatment, retroperitoneal lymph nodes (n = 6 at each time point) were collected and high-performance liquid chromatography was employed to measure the carboplatin content. The differences in carboplatin pharmacokinetics of the three administration routes were compared. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) was carried out to measure the lymphocyte apoptosis of the retroperitoneal lymphocytes. The peak concentration of carboplatin in plasma following IV administration was the highest among all approaches; as to the peak time, RP administration was longer than the other two administrations. Concentration for carboplatin in the retroperitoneal lymph node was highest following IA administration at early time points, but at higher time points, concentration was significantly higher following RP administration. Penetration of carboplatin into the retroperitoneal space was higher following RP administration. Following RP administration, the level of apoptotic lymphocytes in the retroperitoneal lymph nodes was significantly greater than either IV or IA. Following RP administration of carboplatin, the concentration, area under the curve of carboplatin and the number of apoptotic lymphocytes were significantly higher than those following IV and IA administration. This suggests that RP administration of carboplatin is beneficial for the treatment of retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intraveneous</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Gynecological cancer</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ovarian</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Endometrial</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intra-arterial</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zeng, Zheng</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Li, Su</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liu, Ji-Hong</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Tumor biology</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam : IOS Press, 1987</subfield><subfield code="g">33(2012), 6 vom: 29. Juli, Seite 2053-2059</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)300897855</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1483579-4</subfield><subfield code="x">1423-0380</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:33</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2012</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">day:29</subfield><subfield code="g">month:07</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:2053-2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13277-012-0464-6</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2070</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2086</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2116</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">33</subfield><subfield code="j">2012</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="b">29</subfield><subfield code="c">07</subfield><subfield code="h">2053-2059</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Huang, Yong-Wen
spellingShingle	Huang, Yong-Wen misc Intraveneous misc Gynecological cancer misc Ovarian misc Endometrial misc Intra-arterial Differential routes of carboplatin administration influence lymphocyte apoptosis in retroperitoneal lymph nodes
authorStr	Huang, Yong-Wen
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)300897855
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut
collection	springer
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	1423-0380
topic_title	Differential routes of carboplatin administration influence lymphocyte apoptosis in retroperitoneal lymph nodes Intraveneous (dpeaa)DE-He213 Gynecological cancer (dpeaa)DE-He213 Ovarian (dpeaa)DE-He213 Endometrial (dpeaa)DE-He213 Intra-arterial (dpeaa)DE-He213
topic	misc Intraveneous misc Gynecological cancer misc Ovarian misc Endometrial misc Intra-arterial
topic_unstemmed	misc Intraveneous misc Gynecological cancer misc Ovarian misc Endometrial misc Intra-arterial
topic_browse	misc Intraveneous misc Gynecological cancer misc Ovarian misc Endometrial misc Intra-arterial
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Tumor biology
hierarchy_parent_id	300897855
hierarchy_top_title	Tumor biology
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)300897855 (DE-600)1483579-4
title	Differential routes of carboplatin administration influence lymphocyte apoptosis in retroperitoneal lymph nodes
ctrlnum	(DE-627)SPR031125786 (SPR)s13277-012-0464-6-e
title_full	Differential routes of carboplatin administration influence lymphocyte apoptosis in retroperitoneal lymph nodes
author_sort	Huang, Yong-Wen
journal	Tumor biology
journalStr	Tumor biology
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2012
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	2053
author_browse	Huang, Yong-Wen Zeng, Zheng Li, Su Liu, Ji-Hong
container_volume	33
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Huang, Yong-Wen
doi_str_mv	10.1007/s13277-012-0464-6
title_sort	differential routes of carboplatin administration influence lymphocyte apoptosis in retroperitoneal lymph nodes
title_auth	Differential routes of carboplatin administration influence lymphocyte apoptosis in retroperitoneal lymph nodes
abstract	Abstract We aimed to investigate carboplatin distribution in retroperitoneal lymph nodes and its effect on lymphocyte apoptosis following intravenous (IV), intra-arterial (IA), and retroperitoneal (RP) administration. Sixty-three healthy female canines were randomly assigned as IV, IA, or RP administration of carboplatin. At 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, and 72 h after carboplatin treatment, retroperitoneal lymph nodes (n = 6 at each time point) were collected and high-performance liquid chromatography was employed to measure the carboplatin content. The differences in carboplatin pharmacokinetics of the three administration routes were compared. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) was carried out to measure the lymphocyte apoptosis of the retroperitoneal lymphocytes. The peak concentration of carboplatin in plasma following IV administration was the highest among all approaches; as to the peak time, RP administration was longer than the other two administrations. Concentration for carboplatin in the retroperitoneal lymph node was highest following IA administration at early time points, but at higher time points, concentration was significantly higher following RP administration. Penetration of carboplatin into the retroperitoneal space was higher following RP administration. Following RP administration, the level of apoptotic lymphocytes in the retroperitoneal lymph nodes was significantly greater than either IV or IA. Following RP administration of carboplatin, the concentration, area under the curve of carboplatin and the number of apoptotic lymphocytes were significantly higher than those following IV and IA administration. This suggests that RP administration of carboplatin is beneficial for the treatment of retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis. © International Society of Oncology and BioMarkers (ISOBM) 2012
abstractGer	Abstract We aimed to investigate carboplatin distribution in retroperitoneal lymph nodes and its effect on lymphocyte apoptosis following intravenous (IV), intra-arterial (IA), and retroperitoneal (RP) administration. Sixty-three healthy female canines were randomly assigned as IV, IA, or RP administration of carboplatin. At 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, and 72 h after carboplatin treatment, retroperitoneal lymph nodes (n = 6 at each time point) were collected and high-performance liquid chromatography was employed to measure the carboplatin content. The differences in carboplatin pharmacokinetics of the three administration routes were compared. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) was carried out to measure the lymphocyte apoptosis of the retroperitoneal lymphocytes. The peak concentration of carboplatin in plasma following IV administration was the highest among all approaches; as to the peak time, RP administration was longer than the other two administrations. Concentration for carboplatin in the retroperitoneal lymph node was highest following IA administration at early time points, but at higher time points, concentration was significantly higher following RP administration. Penetration of carboplatin into the retroperitoneal space was higher following RP administration. Following RP administration, the level of apoptotic lymphocytes in the retroperitoneal lymph nodes was significantly greater than either IV or IA. Following RP administration of carboplatin, the concentration, area under the curve of carboplatin and the number of apoptotic lymphocytes were significantly higher than those following IV and IA administration. This suggests that RP administration of carboplatin is beneficial for the treatment of retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis. © International Society of Oncology and BioMarkers (ISOBM) 2012
abstract_unstemmed	Abstract We aimed to investigate carboplatin distribution in retroperitoneal lymph nodes and its effect on lymphocyte apoptosis following intravenous (IV), intra-arterial (IA), and retroperitoneal (RP) administration. Sixty-three healthy female canines were randomly assigned as IV, IA, or RP administration of carboplatin. At 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, and 72 h after carboplatin treatment, retroperitoneal lymph nodes (n = 6 at each time point) were collected and high-performance liquid chromatography was employed to measure the carboplatin content. The differences in carboplatin pharmacokinetics of the three administration routes were compared. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) was carried out to measure the lymphocyte apoptosis of the retroperitoneal lymphocytes. The peak concentration of carboplatin in plasma following IV administration was the highest among all approaches; as to the peak time, RP administration was longer than the other two administrations. Concentration for carboplatin in the retroperitoneal lymph node was highest following IA administration at early time points, but at higher time points, concentration was significantly higher following RP administration. Penetration of carboplatin into the retroperitoneal space was higher following RP administration. Following RP administration, the level of apoptotic lymphocytes in the retroperitoneal lymph nodes was significantly greater than either IV or IA. Following RP administration of carboplatin, the concentration, area under the curve of carboplatin and the number of apoptotic lymphocytes were significantly higher than those following IV and IA administration. This suggests that RP administration of carboplatin is beneficial for the treatment of retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis. © International Society of Oncology and BioMarkers (ISOBM) 2012
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4338
container_issue	6
title_short	Differential routes of carboplatin administration influence lymphocyte apoptosis in retroperitoneal lymph nodes
url	https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13277-012-0464-6
remote_bool	true
author2	Zeng, Zheng Li, Su Liu, Ji-Hong
author2Str	Zeng, Zheng Li, Su Liu, Ji-Hong
ppnlink	300897855
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1007/s13277-012-0464-6
up_date	2024-07-03T22:07:33.971Z
_version_	1803597333372338176
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR031125786</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519092835.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2012 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s13277-012-0464-6</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR031125786</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s13277-012-0464-6-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Huang, Yong-Wen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Differential routes of carboplatin administration influence lymphocyte apoptosis in retroperitoneal lymph nodes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© International Society of Oncology and BioMarkers (ISOBM) 2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract We aimed to investigate carboplatin distribution in retroperitoneal lymph nodes and its effect on lymphocyte apoptosis following intravenous (IV), intra-arterial (IA), and retroperitoneal (RP) administration. Sixty-three healthy female canines were randomly assigned as IV, IA, or RP administration of carboplatin. At 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, and 72 h after carboplatin treatment, retroperitoneal lymph nodes (n = 6 at each time point) were collected and high-performance liquid chromatography was employed to measure the carboplatin content. The differences in carboplatin pharmacokinetics of the three administration routes were compared. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) was carried out to measure the lymphocyte apoptosis of the retroperitoneal lymphocytes. The peak concentration of carboplatin in plasma following IV administration was the highest among all approaches; as to the peak time, RP administration was longer than the other two administrations. Concentration for carboplatin in the retroperitoneal lymph node was highest following IA administration at early time points, but at higher time points, concentration was significantly higher following RP administration. Penetration of carboplatin into the retroperitoneal space was higher following RP administration. Following RP administration, the level of apoptotic lymphocytes in the retroperitoneal lymph nodes was significantly greater than either IV or IA. Following RP administration of carboplatin, the concentration, area under the curve of carboplatin and the number of apoptotic lymphocytes were significantly higher than those following IV and IA administration. This suggests that RP administration of carboplatin is beneficial for the treatment of retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intraveneous</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Gynecological cancer</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ovarian</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Endometrial</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intra-arterial</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zeng, Zheng</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Li, Su</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liu, Ji-Hong</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Tumor biology</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam : IOS Press, 1987</subfield><subfield code="g">33(2012), 6 vom: 29. Juli, Seite 2053-2059</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)300897855</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1483579-4</subfield><subfield code="x">1423-0380</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:33</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2012</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">day:29</subfield><subfield code="g">month:07</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:2053-2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13277-012-0464-6</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2070</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2086</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2116</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">33</subfield><subfield code="j">2012</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="b">29</subfield><subfield code="c">07</subfield><subfield code="h">2053-2059</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.402501

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Differential routes of carboplatin administration influence lymphocyte apoptosis in retroperitoneal lymph nodes

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?