A New CT Based Method for Post-operative Motion Analysis of Pelvic Fractures

Abstract Conventional X-ray is commonly used for pelvic fracture follow-ups, but has a precision of only ± 5 mm. Implantation of tantalum beads together with RSA has shown high precision but not applicable in clinical practice. CT scan has been shown a suitable substitute for RSA to follow the metal...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Bakhshayesh, Peyman [verfasserIn] Olivecrona, Henrik Weidenhielm, Lars Enocson, Anders

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2019

Schlagwörter:	Pelvic bone Pelvic fracture Pelvic imaging CT volume fusion CT motion analysis

Anmerkung:	© The Author(s) 2019

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: 3D Research - Berlin : Springer, 2010, 10(2019), 1 vom: 29. Jan.
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:10 ; year:2019 ; number:1 ; day:29 ; month:01

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.1007/s13319-019-0217-z

Katalog-ID:	SPR031330630

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	SPR031330630
003	DE-627
005	20230331071641.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	201007s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1007/s13319-019-0217-z \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)SPR031330630
035			\|a (SPR)s13319-019-0217-z-e
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
100	1		\|a Bakhshayesh, Peyman \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	2	\|a A New CT Based Method for Post-operative Motion Analysis of Pelvic Fractures
264		1	\|c 2019
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
500			\|a © The Author(s) 2019
520			\|a Abstract Conventional X-ray is commonly used for pelvic fracture follow-ups, but has a precision of only ± 5 mm. Implantation of tantalum beads together with RSA has shown high precision but not applicable in clinical practice. CT scan has been shown a suitable substitute for RSA to follow the metal markers. We aimed to assess whether implantation of metal markers could be avoided using CT scan and merging of bone surface anatomy. A human cadaveric pelvis marked with 0.8 mm tantalum beads was fixed over the symphysis and the right SI-joint. Left hemi-pelvis was subsequently distracted using plastic spacers. Sequential CT exams was conducted and data were analyzed using $ Sectra^{®} $ (Sectra AB), CTMA package. Examinations were repeated after 2 weeks. Bone registration showed better precision than registration based on tantalum beads. However, only the difference in angular changes was statistically significant (p = 0.008). The confidence interval of the repeatability was ± 0.5 mm for translation and ± 0.5° for rotation. This new non-invasive technique showed good precision and repeatability and might be a future option in clinical practice for post-operative follow-ups of patients with pelvic fractures.
650		4	\|a Pelvic bone \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Pelvic fracture \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Pelvic imaging \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a CT volume fusion \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a CT motion analysis \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
700	1		\|a Olivecrona, Henrik \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Weidenhielm, Lars \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Enocson, Anders \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t 3D Research \|d Berlin : Springer, 2010 \|g 10(2019), 1 vom: 29. Jan. \|w (DE-627)624823733 \|w (DE-600)2550008-9 \|x 2092-6731 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:10 \|g year:2019 \|g number:1 \|g day:29 \|g month:01
856	4	0	\|u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13319-019-0217-z \|z kostenfrei \|3 Volltext
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_SPRINGER
912			\|a GBV_ILN_120
912			\|a GBV_ILN_266
912			\|a GBV_ILN_281
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2001
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2007
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2015
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2021
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2025
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2026
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2031
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2034
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2038
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2039
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2044
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2059
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2064
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2065
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2068
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2070
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2086
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2106
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2108
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2113
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2116
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2118
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2119
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2122
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2129
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2143
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2144
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2147
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2148
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2153
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2188
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2190
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2232
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4242
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4246
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4251
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 10 \|j 2019 \|e 1 \|b 29 \|c 01

Indexfelder

author_variant	p b pb h o ho l w lw a e ae
matchkey_str	article:20926731:2019----::nwtaemtofrotprtvmtoaayio
hierarchy_sort_str	2019
publishDate	2019
allfields	10.1007/s13319-019-0217-z doi (DE-627)SPR031330630 (SPR)s13319-019-0217-z-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Bakhshayesh, Peyman verfasserin aut A New CT Based Method for Post-operative Motion Analysis of Pelvic Fractures 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2019 Abstract Conventional X-ray is commonly used for pelvic fracture follow-ups, but has a precision of only ± 5 mm. Implantation of tantalum beads together with RSA has shown high precision but not applicable in clinical practice. CT scan has been shown a suitable substitute for RSA to follow the metal markers. We aimed to assess whether implantation of metal markers could be avoided using CT scan and merging of bone surface anatomy. A human cadaveric pelvis marked with 0.8 mm tantalum beads was fixed over the symphysis and the right SI-joint. Left hemi-pelvis was subsequently distracted using plastic spacers. Sequential CT exams was conducted and data were analyzed using $ Sectra^{®} $ (Sectra AB), CTMA package. Examinations were repeated after 2 weeks. Bone registration showed better precision than registration based on tantalum beads. However, only the difference in angular changes was statistically significant (p = 0.008). The confidence interval of the repeatability was ± 0.5 mm for translation and ± 0.5° for rotation. This new non-invasive technique showed good precision and repeatability and might be a future option in clinical practice for post-operative follow-ups of patients with pelvic fractures. Pelvic bone (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pelvic fracture (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pelvic imaging (dpeaa)DE-He213 CT volume fusion (dpeaa)DE-He213 CT motion analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Olivecrona, Henrik aut Weidenhielm, Lars aut Enocson, Anders aut Enthalten in 3D Research Berlin : Springer, 2010 10(2019), 1 vom: 29. Jan. (DE-627)624823733 (DE-600)2550008-9 2092-6731 nnns volume:10 year:2019 number:1 day:29 month:01 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13319-019-0217-z kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_266 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 AR 10 2019 1 29 01
spelling	10.1007/s13319-019-0217-z doi (DE-627)SPR031330630 (SPR)s13319-019-0217-z-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Bakhshayesh, Peyman verfasserin aut A New CT Based Method for Post-operative Motion Analysis of Pelvic Fractures 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2019 Abstract Conventional X-ray is commonly used for pelvic fracture follow-ups, but has a precision of only ± 5 mm. Implantation of tantalum beads together with RSA has shown high precision but not applicable in clinical practice. CT scan has been shown a suitable substitute for RSA to follow the metal markers. We aimed to assess whether implantation of metal markers could be avoided using CT scan and merging of bone surface anatomy. A human cadaveric pelvis marked with 0.8 mm tantalum beads was fixed over the symphysis and the right SI-joint. Left hemi-pelvis was subsequently distracted using plastic spacers. Sequential CT exams was conducted and data were analyzed using $ Sectra^{®} $ (Sectra AB), CTMA package. Examinations were repeated after 2 weeks. Bone registration showed better precision than registration based on tantalum beads. However, only the difference in angular changes was statistically significant (p = 0.008). The confidence interval of the repeatability was ± 0.5 mm for translation and ± 0.5° for rotation. This new non-invasive technique showed good precision and repeatability and might be a future option in clinical practice for post-operative follow-ups of patients with pelvic fractures. Pelvic bone (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pelvic fracture (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pelvic imaging (dpeaa)DE-He213 CT volume fusion (dpeaa)DE-He213 CT motion analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Olivecrona, Henrik aut Weidenhielm, Lars aut Enocson, Anders aut Enthalten in 3D Research Berlin : Springer, 2010 10(2019), 1 vom: 29. Jan. (DE-627)624823733 (DE-600)2550008-9 2092-6731 nnns volume:10 year:2019 number:1 day:29 month:01 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13319-019-0217-z kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_266 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 AR 10 2019 1 29 01
allfields_unstemmed	10.1007/s13319-019-0217-z doi (DE-627)SPR031330630 (SPR)s13319-019-0217-z-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Bakhshayesh, Peyman verfasserin aut A New CT Based Method for Post-operative Motion Analysis of Pelvic Fractures 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2019 Abstract Conventional X-ray is commonly used for pelvic fracture follow-ups, but has a precision of only ± 5 mm. Implantation of tantalum beads together with RSA has shown high precision but not applicable in clinical practice. CT scan has been shown a suitable substitute for RSA to follow the metal markers. We aimed to assess whether implantation of metal markers could be avoided using CT scan and merging of bone surface anatomy. A human cadaveric pelvis marked with 0.8 mm tantalum beads was fixed over the symphysis and the right SI-joint. Left hemi-pelvis was subsequently distracted using plastic spacers. Sequential CT exams was conducted and data were analyzed using $ Sectra^{®} $ (Sectra AB), CTMA package. Examinations were repeated after 2 weeks. Bone registration showed better precision than registration based on tantalum beads. However, only the difference in angular changes was statistically significant (p = 0.008). The confidence interval of the repeatability was ± 0.5 mm for translation and ± 0.5° for rotation. This new non-invasive technique showed good precision and repeatability and might be a future option in clinical practice for post-operative follow-ups of patients with pelvic fractures. Pelvic bone (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pelvic fracture (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pelvic imaging (dpeaa)DE-He213 CT volume fusion (dpeaa)DE-He213 CT motion analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Olivecrona, Henrik aut Weidenhielm, Lars aut Enocson, Anders aut Enthalten in 3D Research Berlin : Springer, 2010 10(2019), 1 vom: 29. Jan. (DE-627)624823733 (DE-600)2550008-9 2092-6731 nnns volume:10 year:2019 number:1 day:29 month:01 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13319-019-0217-z kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_266 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 AR 10 2019 1 29 01
allfieldsGer	10.1007/s13319-019-0217-z doi (DE-627)SPR031330630 (SPR)s13319-019-0217-z-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Bakhshayesh, Peyman verfasserin aut A New CT Based Method for Post-operative Motion Analysis of Pelvic Fractures 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2019 Abstract Conventional X-ray is commonly used for pelvic fracture follow-ups, but has a precision of only ± 5 mm. Implantation of tantalum beads together with RSA has shown high precision but not applicable in clinical practice. CT scan has been shown a suitable substitute for RSA to follow the metal markers. We aimed to assess whether implantation of metal markers could be avoided using CT scan and merging of bone surface anatomy. A human cadaveric pelvis marked with 0.8 mm tantalum beads was fixed over the symphysis and the right SI-joint. Left hemi-pelvis was subsequently distracted using plastic spacers. Sequential CT exams was conducted and data were analyzed using $ Sectra^{®} $ (Sectra AB), CTMA package. Examinations were repeated after 2 weeks. Bone registration showed better precision than registration based on tantalum beads. However, only the difference in angular changes was statistically significant (p = 0.008). The confidence interval of the repeatability was ± 0.5 mm for translation and ± 0.5° for rotation. This new non-invasive technique showed good precision and repeatability and might be a future option in clinical practice for post-operative follow-ups of patients with pelvic fractures. Pelvic bone (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pelvic fracture (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pelvic imaging (dpeaa)DE-He213 CT volume fusion (dpeaa)DE-He213 CT motion analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Olivecrona, Henrik aut Weidenhielm, Lars aut Enocson, Anders aut Enthalten in 3D Research Berlin : Springer, 2010 10(2019), 1 vom: 29. Jan. (DE-627)624823733 (DE-600)2550008-9 2092-6731 nnns volume:10 year:2019 number:1 day:29 month:01 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13319-019-0217-z kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_266 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 AR 10 2019 1 29 01
allfieldsSound	10.1007/s13319-019-0217-z doi (DE-627)SPR031330630 (SPR)s13319-019-0217-z-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Bakhshayesh, Peyman verfasserin aut A New CT Based Method for Post-operative Motion Analysis of Pelvic Fractures 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2019 Abstract Conventional X-ray is commonly used for pelvic fracture follow-ups, but has a precision of only ± 5 mm. Implantation of tantalum beads together with RSA has shown high precision but not applicable in clinical practice. CT scan has been shown a suitable substitute for RSA to follow the metal markers. We aimed to assess whether implantation of metal markers could be avoided using CT scan and merging of bone surface anatomy. A human cadaveric pelvis marked with 0.8 mm tantalum beads was fixed over the symphysis and the right SI-joint. Left hemi-pelvis was subsequently distracted using plastic spacers. Sequential CT exams was conducted and data were analyzed using $ Sectra^{®} $ (Sectra AB), CTMA package. Examinations were repeated after 2 weeks. Bone registration showed better precision than registration based on tantalum beads. However, only the difference in angular changes was statistically significant (p = 0.008). The confidence interval of the repeatability was ± 0.5 mm for translation and ± 0.5° for rotation. This new non-invasive technique showed good precision and repeatability and might be a future option in clinical practice for post-operative follow-ups of patients with pelvic fractures. Pelvic bone (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pelvic fracture (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pelvic imaging (dpeaa)DE-He213 CT volume fusion (dpeaa)DE-He213 CT motion analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Olivecrona, Henrik aut Weidenhielm, Lars aut Enocson, Anders aut Enthalten in 3D Research Berlin : Springer, 2010 10(2019), 1 vom: 29. Jan. (DE-627)624823733 (DE-600)2550008-9 2092-6731 nnns volume:10 year:2019 number:1 day:29 month:01 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13319-019-0217-z kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_266 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 AR 10 2019 1 29 01
language	English
source	Enthalten in 3D Research 10(2019), 1 vom: 29. Jan. volume:10 year:2019 number:1 day:29 month:01
sourceStr	Enthalten in 3D Research 10(2019), 1 vom: 29. Jan. volume:10 year:2019 number:1 day:29 month:01
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Pelvic bone Pelvic fracture Pelvic imaging CT volume fusion CT motion analysis
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	3D Research
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Bakhshayesh, Peyman @@aut@@ Olivecrona, Henrik @@aut@@ Weidenhielm, Lars @@aut@@ Enocson, Anders @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2019-01-29T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	624823733
id	SPR031330630
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR031330630</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230331071641.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s13319-019-0217-z</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR031330630</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s13319-019-0217-z-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bakhshayesh, Peyman</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">A New CT Based Method for Post-operative Motion Analysis of Pelvic Fractures</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Conventional X-ray is commonly used for pelvic fracture follow-ups, but has a precision of only ± 5 mm. Implantation of tantalum beads together with RSA has shown high precision but not applicable in clinical practice. CT scan has been shown a suitable substitute for RSA to follow the metal markers. We aimed to assess whether implantation of metal markers could be avoided using CT scan and merging of bone surface anatomy. A human cadaveric pelvis marked with 0.8 mm tantalum beads was fixed over the symphysis and the right SI-joint. Left hemi-pelvis was subsequently distracted using plastic spacers. Sequential CT exams was conducted and data were analyzed using $ Sectra^{®} $ (Sectra AB), CTMA package. Examinations were repeated after 2 weeks. Bone registration showed better precision than registration based on tantalum beads. However, only the difference in angular changes was statistically significant (p = 0.008). The confidence interval of the repeatability was ± 0.5 mm for translation and ± 0.5° for rotation. This new non-invasive technique showed good precision and repeatability and might be a future option in clinical practice for post-operative follow-ups of patients with pelvic fractures.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pelvic bone</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pelvic fracture</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pelvic imaging</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CT volume fusion</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CT motion analysis</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Olivecrona, Henrik</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Weidenhielm, Lars</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Enocson, Anders</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">3D Research</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : Springer, 2010</subfield><subfield code="g">10(2019), 1 vom: 29. Jan.</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)624823733</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2550008-9</subfield><subfield code="x">2092-6731</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:10</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:29</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13319-019-0217-z</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_266</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2070</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2086</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2116</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">10</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">29</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Bakhshayesh, Peyman
spellingShingle	Bakhshayesh, Peyman misc Pelvic bone misc Pelvic fracture misc Pelvic imaging misc CT volume fusion misc CT motion analysis A New CT Based Method for Post-operative Motion Analysis of Pelvic Fractures
authorStr	Bakhshayesh, Peyman
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)624823733
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut
collection	springer
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	2092-6731
topic_title	A New CT Based Method for Post-operative Motion Analysis of Pelvic Fractures Pelvic bone (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pelvic fracture (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pelvic imaging (dpeaa)DE-He213 CT volume fusion (dpeaa)DE-He213 CT motion analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213
topic	misc Pelvic bone misc Pelvic fracture misc Pelvic imaging misc CT volume fusion misc CT motion analysis
topic_unstemmed	misc Pelvic bone misc Pelvic fracture misc Pelvic imaging misc CT volume fusion misc CT motion analysis
topic_browse	misc Pelvic bone misc Pelvic fracture misc Pelvic imaging misc CT volume fusion misc CT motion analysis
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	3D Research
hierarchy_parent_id	624823733
hierarchy_top_title	3D Research
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)624823733 (DE-600)2550008-9
title	A New CT Based Method for Post-operative Motion Analysis of Pelvic Fractures
ctrlnum	(DE-627)SPR031330630 (SPR)s13319-019-0217-z-e
title_full	A New CT Based Method for Post-operative Motion Analysis of Pelvic Fractures
author_sort	Bakhshayesh, Peyman
journal	3D Research
journalStr	3D Research
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2019
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Bakhshayesh, Peyman Olivecrona, Henrik Weidenhielm, Lars Enocson, Anders
container_volume	10
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Bakhshayesh, Peyman
doi_str_mv	10.1007/s13319-019-0217-z
title_sort	new ct based method for post-operative motion analysis of pelvic fractures
title_auth	A New CT Based Method for Post-operative Motion Analysis of Pelvic Fractures
abstract	Abstract Conventional X-ray is commonly used for pelvic fracture follow-ups, but has a precision of only ± 5 mm. Implantation of tantalum beads together with RSA has shown high precision but not applicable in clinical practice. CT scan has been shown a suitable substitute for RSA to follow the metal markers. We aimed to assess whether implantation of metal markers could be avoided using CT scan and merging of bone surface anatomy. A human cadaveric pelvis marked with 0.8 mm tantalum beads was fixed over the symphysis and the right SI-joint. Left hemi-pelvis was subsequently distracted using plastic spacers. Sequential CT exams was conducted and data were analyzed using $ Sectra^{®} $ (Sectra AB), CTMA package. Examinations were repeated after 2 weeks. Bone registration showed better precision than registration based on tantalum beads. However, only the difference in angular changes was statistically significant (p = 0.008). The confidence interval of the repeatability was ± 0.5 mm for translation and ± 0.5° for rotation. This new non-invasive technique showed good precision and repeatability and might be a future option in clinical practice for post-operative follow-ups of patients with pelvic fractures. © The Author(s) 2019
abstractGer	Abstract Conventional X-ray is commonly used for pelvic fracture follow-ups, but has a precision of only ± 5 mm. Implantation of tantalum beads together with RSA has shown high precision but not applicable in clinical practice. CT scan has been shown a suitable substitute for RSA to follow the metal markers. We aimed to assess whether implantation of metal markers could be avoided using CT scan and merging of bone surface anatomy. A human cadaveric pelvis marked with 0.8 mm tantalum beads was fixed over the symphysis and the right SI-joint. Left hemi-pelvis was subsequently distracted using plastic spacers. Sequential CT exams was conducted and data were analyzed using $ Sectra^{®} $ (Sectra AB), CTMA package. Examinations were repeated after 2 weeks. Bone registration showed better precision than registration based on tantalum beads. However, only the difference in angular changes was statistically significant (p = 0.008). The confidence interval of the repeatability was ± 0.5 mm for translation and ± 0.5° for rotation. This new non-invasive technique showed good precision and repeatability and might be a future option in clinical practice for post-operative follow-ups of patients with pelvic fractures. © The Author(s) 2019
abstract_unstemmed	Abstract Conventional X-ray is commonly used for pelvic fracture follow-ups, but has a precision of only ± 5 mm. Implantation of tantalum beads together with RSA has shown high precision but not applicable in clinical practice. CT scan has been shown a suitable substitute for RSA to follow the metal markers. We aimed to assess whether implantation of metal markers could be avoided using CT scan and merging of bone surface anatomy. A human cadaveric pelvis marked with 0.8 mm tantalum beads was fixed over the symphysis and the right SI-joint. Left hemi-pelvis was subsequently distracted using plastic spacers. Sequential CT exams was conducted and data were analyzed using $ Sectra^{®} $ (Sectra AB), CTMA package. Examinations were repeated after 2 weeks. Bone registration showed better precision than registration based on tantalum beads. However, only the difference in angular changes was statistically significant (p = 0.008). The confidence interval of the repeatability was ± 0.5 mm for translation and ± 0.5° for rotation. This new non-invasive technique showed good precision and repeatability and might be a future option in clinical practice for post-operative follow-ups of patients with pelvic fractures. © The Author(s) 2019
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_266 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251
container_issue	1
title_short	A New CT Based Method for Post-operative Motion Analysis of Pelvic Fractures
url	https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13319-019-0217-z
remote_bool	true
author2	Olivecrona, Henrik Weidenhielm, Lars Enocson, Anders
author2Str	Olivecrona, Henrik Weidenhielm, Lars Enocson, Anders
ppnlink	624823733
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1007/s13319-019-0217-z
up_date	2024-07-03T23:13:12.111Z
_version_	1803601462807232512
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR031330630</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230331071641.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s13319-019-0217-z</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR031330630</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s13319-019-0217-z-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bakhshayesh, Peyman</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">A New CT Based Method for Post-operative Motion Analysis of Pelvic Fractures</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Conventional X-ray is commonly used for pelvic fracture follow-ups, but has a precision of only ± 5 mm. Implantation of tantalum beads together with RSA has shown high precision but not applicable in clinical practice. CT scan has been shown a suitable substitute for RSA to follow the metal markers. We aimed to assess whether implantation of metal markers could be avoided using CT scan and merging of bone surface anatomy. A human cadaveric pelvis marked with 0.8 mm tantalum beads was fixed over the symphysis and the right SI-joint. Left hemi-pelvis was subsequently distracted using plastic spacers. Sequential CT exams was conducted and data were analyzed using $ Sectra^{®} $ (Sectra AB), CTMA package. Examinations were repeated after 2 weeks. Bone registration showed better precision than registration based on tantalum beads. However, only the difference in angular changes was statistically significant (p = 0.008). The confidence interval of the repeatability was ± 0.5 mm for translation and ± 0.5° for rotation. This new non-invasive technique showed good precision and repeatability and might be a future option in clinical practice for post-operative follow-ups of patients with pelvic fractures.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pelvic bone</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pelvic fracture</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pelvic imaging</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CT volume fusion</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CT motion analysis</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Olivecrona, Henrik</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Weidenhielm, Lars</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Enocson, Anders</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">3D Research</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : Springer, 2010</subfield><subfield code="g">10(2019), 1 vom: 29. Jan.</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)624823733</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2550008-9</subfield><subfield code="x">2092-6731</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:10</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:29</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13319-019-0217-z</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_266</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2070</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2086</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2116</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">10</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">29</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.400154

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

A New CT Based Method for Post-operative Motion Analysis of Pelvic Fractures

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?