Age-dependent D-dimer cut-off for the elderly patient in the emergency room

Aims The pulmonary embolism (PE) incidence is increased in elderly patient. The conventional strategy to diagnose PE in elderly population is limited by the low specificity of D-dimer testing, and the interest of an ageadjusted D-dimer cut-off (10xage) was recently validated. The aim of this study w...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Paquet, A. L. [verfasserIn] Balia, D. Dubreucq, E. Roger, C. Hausfater, P. Freund, Y.

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2017

Schlagwörter:	Pulmonary embolism D-dimer Elderly patient Age adjusted cut-off CT scanner

Anmerkung:	© Société française de médecine d'urgence and Lavoisier 2017

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Annales françaises de médecine d'urgence - Paris [u.a.] : Springer, 2011, 7(2017), 2 vom: 02. März, Seite 92-96
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:7 ; year:2017 ; number:2 ; day:02 ; month:03 ; pages:92-96

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.1007/s13341-017-0726-4

Katalog-ID:	SPR031397913

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	SPR031397913
003	DE-627
005	20230519165202.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	201007s2017 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1007/s13341-017-0726-4 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)SPR031397913
035			\|a (SPR)s13341-017-0726-4-e
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
100	1		\|a Paquet, A. L. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Age-dependent D-dimer cut-off for the elderly patient in the emergency room
264		1	\|c 2017
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
500			\|a © Société française de médecine d'urgence and Lavoisier 2017
520			\|a Aims The pulmonary embolism (PE) incidence is increased in elderly patient. The conventional strategy to diagnose PE in elderly population is limited by the low specificity of D-dimer testing, and the interest of an ageadjusted D-dimer cut-off (10xage) was recently validated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of these new recommendations in our emergency department. Procedure We performed a retrospective study on all emergency patients aged 75 and older who were tested for PE in 2015 in our hospital. The primary objective of this study was to assess the use of the recommendation for age adjusted cut-off. Results One hundred and twenty six patients were enrolled. Thirty patients (24%) had negative D-dimer considering the age adjusted cut-off but higher than the usual threshold of 500 μg/l. In this group, four (13%) underwent a CT pulmonary angiogram, which means that emergency physicians applied the new guidelines in 87% cases (95% CI 70% - 97%). No PE was found among these four patients. Conclusion The age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off in elderly patients with suspicion of PE doesn’t seem to be well endorsed in our emergency department.
650		4	\|a Pulmonary embolism \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a D-dimer \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Elderly patient \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Age adjusted cut-off \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a CT scanner \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
700	1		\|a Balia, D. \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Dubreucq, E. \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Roger, C. \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Hausfater, P. \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Freund, Y. \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Annales françaises de médecine d'urgence \|d Paris [u.a.] : Springer, 2011 \|g 7(2017), 2 vom: 02. März, Seite 92-96 \|w (DE-627)643826459 \|w (DE-600)2588257-0 \|x 2108-6591 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:7 \|g year:2017 \|g number:2 \|g day:02 \|g month:03 \|g pages:92-96
856	4	0	\|u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13341-017-0726-4 \|z lizenzpflichtig \|3 Volltext
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_SPRINGER
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHA
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2001
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2006
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2007
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2010
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2015
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2020
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2021
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2025
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2026
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2031
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2034
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2038
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2039
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2044
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2057
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2059
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2064
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2065
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2068
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2070
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2086
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2106
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2108
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2113
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2116
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2118
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2119
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2122
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2129
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2143
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2144
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2147
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2148
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2153
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2188
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2190
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2232
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4328
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4333
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 7 \|j 2017 \|e 2 \|b 02 \|c 03 \|h 92-96

Indexfelder

author_variant	a l p al alp d b db e d ed c r cr p h ph y f yf
matchkey_str	article:21086591:2017----::gdpnetdmruofotelelptet
hierarchy_sort_str	2017
publishDate	2017
allfields	10.1007/s13341-017-0726-4 doi (DE-627)SPR031397913 (SPR)s13341-017-0726-4-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Paquet, A. L. verfasserin aut Age-dependent D-dimer cut-off for the elderly patient in the emergency room 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Société française de médecine d'urgence and Lavoisier 2017 Aims The pulmonary embolism (PE) incidence is increased in elderly patient. The conventional strategy to diagnose PE in elderly population is limited by the low specificity of D-dimer testing, and the interest of an ageadjusted D-dimer cut-off (10xage) was recently validated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of these new recommendations in our emergency department. Procedure We performed a retrospective study on all emergency patients aged 75 and older who were tested for PE in 2015 in our hospital. The primary objective of this study was to assess the use of the recommendation for age adjusted cut-off. Results One hundred and twenty six patients were enrolled. Thirty patients (24%) had negative D-dimer considering the age adjusted cut-off but higher than the usual threshold of 500 μg/l. In this group, four (13%) underwent a CT pulmonary angiogram, which means that emergency physicians applied the new guidelines in 87% cases (95% CI 70% - 97%). No PE was found among these four patients. Conclusion The age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off in elderly patients with suspicion of PE doesn’t seem to be well endorsed in our emergency department. Pulmonary embolism (dpeaa)DE-He213 D-dimer (dpeaa)DE-He213 Elderly patient (dpeaa)DE-He213 Age adjusted cut-off (dpeaa)DE-He213 CT scanner (dpeaa)DE-He213 Balia, D. aut Dubreucq, E. aut Roger, C. aut Hausfater, P. aut Freund, Y. aut Enthalten in Annales françaises de médecine d'urgence Paris [u.a.] : Springer, 2011 7(2017), 2 vom: 02. März, Seite 92-96 (DE-627)643826459 (DE-600)2588257-0 2108-6591 nnns volume:7 year:2017 number:2 day:02 month:03 pages:92-96 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13341-017-0726-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 AR 7 2017 2 02 03 92-96
spelling	10.1007/s13341-017-0726-4 doi (DE-627)SPR031397913 (SPR)s13341-017-0726-4-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Paquet, A. L. verfasserin aut Age-dependent D-dimer cut-off for the elderly patient in the emergency room 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Société française de médecine d'urgence and Lavoisier 2017 Aims The pulmonary embolism (PE) incidence is increased in elderly patient. The conventional strategy to diagnose PE in elderly population is limited by the low specificity of D-dimer testing, and the interest of an ageadjusted D-dimer cut-off (10xage) was recently validated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of these new recommendations in our emergency department. Procedure We performed a retrospective study on all emergency patients aged 75 and older who were tested for PE in 2015 in our hospital. The primary objective of this study was to assess the use of the recommendation for age adjusted cut-off. Results One hundred and twenty six patients were enrolled. Thirty patients (24%) had negative D-dimer considering the age adjusted cut-off but higher than the usual threshold of 500 μg/l. In this group, four (13%) underwent a CT pulmonary angiogram, which means that emergency physicians applied the new guidelines in 87% cases (95% CI 70% - 97%). No PE was found among these four patients. Conclusion The age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off in elderly patients with suspicion of PE doesn’t seem to be well endorsed in our emergency department. Pulmonary embolism (dpeaa)DE-He213 D-dimer (dpeaa)DE-He213 Elderly patient (dpeaa)DE-He213 Age adjusted cut-off (dpeaa)DE-He213 CT scanner (dpeaa)DE-He213 Balia, D. aut Dubreucq, E. aut Roger, C. aut Hausfater, P. aut Freund, Y. aut Enthalten in Annales françaises de médecine d'urgence Paris [u.a.] : Springer, 2011 7(2017), 2 vom: 02. März, Seite 92-96 (DE-627)643826459 (DE-600)2588257-0 2108-6591 nnns volume:7 year:2017 number:2 day:02 month:03 pages:92-96 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13341-017-0726-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 AR 7 2017 2 02 03 92-96
allfields_unstemmed	10.1007/s13341-017-0726-4 doi (DE-627)SPR031397913 (SPR)s13341-017-0726-4-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Paquet, A. L. verfasserin aut Age-dependent D-dimer cut-off for the elderly patient in the emergency room 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Société française de médecine d'urgence and Lavoisier 2017 Aims The pulmonary embolism (PE) incidence is increased in elderly patient. The conventional strategy to diagnose PE in elderly population is limited by the low specificity of D-dimer testing, and the interest of an ageadjusted D-dimer cut-off (10xage) was recently validated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of these new recommendations in our emergency department. Procedure We performed a retrospective study on all emergency patients aged 75 and older who were tested for PE in 2015 in our hospital. The primary objective of this study was to assess the use of the recommendation for age adjusted cut-off. Results One hundred and twenty six patients were enrolled. Thirty patients (24%) had negative D-dimer considering the age adjusted cut-off but higher than the usual threshold of 500 μg/l. In this group, four (13%) underwent a CT pulmonary angiogram, which means that emergency physicians applied the new guidelines in 87% cases (95% CI 70% - 97%). No PE was found among these four patients. Conclusion The age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off in elderly patients with suspicion of PE doesn’t seem to be well endorsed in our emergency department. Pulmonary embolism (dpeaa)DE-He213 D-dimer (dpeaa)DE-He213 Elderly patient (dpeaa)DE-He213 Age adjusted cut-off (dpeaa)DE-He213 CT scanner (dpeaa)DE-He213 Balia, D. aut Dubreucq, E. aut Roger, C. aut Hausfater, P. aut Freund, Y. aut Enthalten in Annales françaises de médecine d'urgence Paris [u.a.] : Springer, 2011 7(2017), 2 vom: 02. März, Seite 92-96 (DE-627)643826459 (DE-600)2588257-0 2108-6591 nnns volume:7 year:2017 number:2 day:02 month:03 pages:92-96 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13341-017-0726-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 AR 7 2017 2 02 03 92-96
allfieldsGer	10.1007/s13341-017-0726-4 doi (DE-627)SPR031397913 (SPR)s13341-017-0726-4-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Paquet, A. L. verfasserin aut Age-dependent D-dimer cut-off for the elderly patient in the emergency room 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Société française de médecine d'urgence and Lavoisier 2017 Aims The pulmonary embolism (PE) incidence is increased in elderly patient. The conventional strategy to diagnose PE in elderly population is limited by the low specificity of D-dimer testing, and the interest of an ageadjusted D-dimer cut-off (10xage) was recently validated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of these new recommendations in our emergency department. Procedure We performed a retrospective study on all emergency patients aged 75 and older who were tested for PE in 2015 in our hospital. The primary objective of this study was to assess the use of the recommendation for age adjusted cut-off. Results One hundred and twenty six patients were enrolled. Thirty patients (24%) had negative D-dimer considering the age adjusted cut-off but higher than the usual threshold of 500 μg/l. In this group, four (13%) underwent a CT pulmonary angiogram, which means that emergency physicians applied the new guidelines in 87% cases (95% CI 70% - 97%). No PE was found among these four patients. Conclusion The age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off in elderly patients with suspicion of PE doesn’t seem to be well endorsed in our emergency department. Pulmonary embolism (dpeaa)DE-He213 D-dimer (dpeaa)DE-He213 Elderly patient (dpeaa)DE-He213 Age adjusted cut-off (dpeaa)DE-He213 CT scanner (dpeaa)DE-He213 Balia, D. aut Dubreucq, E. aut Roger, C. aut Hausfater, P. aut Freund, Y. aut Enthalten in Annales françaises de médecine d'urgence Paris [u.a.] : Springer, 2011 7(2017), 2 vom: 02. März, Seite 92-96 (DE-627)643826459 (DE-600)2588257-0 2108-6591 nnns volume:7 year:2017 number:2 day:02 month:03 pages:92-96 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13341-017-0726-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 AR 7 2017 2 02 03 92-96
allfieldsSound	10.1007/s13341-017-0726-4 doi (DE-627)SPR031397913 (SPR)s13341-017-0726-4-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Paquet, A. L. verfasserin aut Age-dependent D-dimer cut-off for the elderly patient in the emergency room 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Société française de médecine d'urgence and Lavoisier 2017 Aims The pulmonary embolism (PE) incidence is increased in elderly patient. The conventional strategy to diagnose PE in elderly population is limited by the low specificity of D-dimer testing, and the interest of an ageadjusted D-dimer cut-off (10xage) was recently validated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of these new recommendations in our emergency department. Procedure We performed a retrospective study on all emergency patients aged 75 and older who were tested for PE in 2015 in our hospital. The primary objective of this study was to assess the use of the recommendation for age adjusted cut-off. Results One hundred and twenty six patients were enrolled. Thirty patients (24%) had negative D-dimer considering the age adjusted cut-off but higher than the usual threshold of 500 μg/l. In this group, four (13%) underwent a CT pulmonary angiogram, which means that emergency physicians applied the new guidelines in 87% cases (95% CI 70% - 97%). No PE was found among these four patients. Conclusion The age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off in elderly patients with suspicion of PE doesn’t seem to be well endorsed in our emergency department. Pulmonary embolism (dpeaa)DE-He213 D-dimer (dpeaa)DE-He213 Elderly patient (dpeaa)DE-He213 Age adjusted cut-off (dpeaa)DE-He213 CT scanner (dpeaa)DE-He213 Balia, D. aut Dubreucq, E. aut Roger, C. aut Hausfater, P. aut Freund, Y. aut Enthalten in Annales françaises de médecine d'urgence Paris [u.a.] : Springer, 2011 7(2017), 2 vom: 02. März, Seite 92-96 (DE-627)643826459 (DE-600)2588257-0 2108-6591 nnns volume:7 year:2017 number:2 day:02 month:03 pages:92-96 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13341-017-0726-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 AR 7 2017 2 02 03 92-96
language	English
source	Enthalten in Annales françaises de médecine d'urgence 7(2017), 2 vom: 02. März, Seite 92-96 volume:7 year:2017 number:2 day:02 month:03 pages:92-96
sourceStr	Enthalten in Annales françaises de médecine d'urgence 7(2017), 2 vom: 02. März, Seite 92-96 volume:7 year:2017 number:2 day:02 month:03 pages:92-96
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Pulmonary embolism D-dimer Elderly patient Age adjusted cut-off CT scanner
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	Annales françaises de médecine d'urgence
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Paquet, A. L. @@aut@@ Balia, D. @@aut@@ Dubreucq, E. @@aut@@ Roger, C. @@aut@@ Hausfater, P. @@aut@@ Freund, Y. @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2017-03-02T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	643826459
id	SPR031397913
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR031397913</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519165202.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2017 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s13341-017-0726-4</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR031397913</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s13341-017-0726-4-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Paquet, A. L.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Age-dependent D-dimer cut-off for the elderly patient in the emergency room</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Société française de médecine d'urgence and Lavoisier 2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aims The pulmonary embolism (PE) incidence is increased in elderly patient. The conventional strategy to diagnose PE in elderly population is limited by the low specificity of D-dimer testing, and the interest of an ageadjusted D-dimer cut-off (10xage) was recently validated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of these new recommendations in our emergency department. Procedure We performed a retrospective study on all emergency patients aged 75 and older who were tested for PE in 2015 in our hospital. The primary objective of this study was to assess the use of the recommendation for age adjusted cut-off. Results One hundred and twenty six patients were enrolled. Thirty patients (24%) had negative D-dimer considering the age adjusted cut-off but higher than the usual threshold of 500 μg/l. In this group, four (13%) underwent a CT pulmonary angiogram, which means that emergency physicians applied the new guidelines in 87% cases (95% CI 70% - 97%). No PE was found among these four patients. Conclusion The age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off in elderly patients with suspicion of PE doesn’t seem to be well endorsed in our emergency department.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pulmonary embolism</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">D-dimer</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Elderly patient</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Age adjusted cut-off</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CT scanner</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Balia, D.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dubreucq, E.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Roger, C.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hausfater, P.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Freund, Y.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Annales françaises de médecine d'urgence</subfield><subfield code="d">Paris [u.a.] : Springer, 2011</subfield><subfield code="g">7(2017), 2 vom: 02. März, Seite 92-96</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)643826459</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2588257-0</subfield><subfield code="x">2108-6591</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:7</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:02</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:92-96</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13341-017-0726-4</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2070</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2086</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2116</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">7</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">02</subfield><subfield code="c">03</subfield><subfield code="h">92-96</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Paquet, A. L.
spellingShingle	Paquet, A. L. misc Pulmonary embolism misc D-dimer misc Elderly patient misc Age adjusted cut-off misc CT scanner Age-dependent D-dimer cut-off for the elderly patient in the emergency room
authorStr	Paquet, A. L.
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)643826459
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	springer
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	2108-6591
topic_title	Age-dependent D-dimer cut-off for the elderly patient in the emergency room Pulmonary embolism (dpeaa)DE-He213 D-dimer (dpeaa)DE-He213 Elderly patient (dpeaa)DE-He213 Age adjusted cut-off (dpeaa)DE-He213 CT scanner (dpeaa)DE-He213
topic	misc Pulmonary embolism misc D-dimer misc Elderly patient misc Age adjusted cut-off misc CT scanner
topic_unstemmed	misc Pulmonary embolism misc D-dimer misc Elderly patient misc Age adjusted cut-off misc CT scanner
topic_browse	misc Pulmonary embolism misc D-dimer misc Elderly patient misc Age adjusted cut-off misc CT scanner
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Annales françaises de médecine d'urgence
hierarchy_parent_id	643826459
hierarchy_top_title	Annales françaises de médecine d'urgence
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)643826459 (DE-600)2588257-0
title	Age-dependent D-dimer cut-off for the elderly patient in the emergency room
ctrlnum	(DE-627)SPR031397913 (SPR)s13341-017-0726-4-e
title_full	Age-dependent D-dimer cut-off for the elderly patient in the emergency room
author_sort	Paquet, A. L.
journal	Annales françaises de médecine d'urgence
journalStr	Annales françaises de médecine d'urgence
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2017
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	92
author_browse	Paquet, A. L. Balia, D. Dubreucq, E. Roger, C. Hausfater, P. Freund, Y.
container_volume	7
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Paquet, A. L.
doi_str_mv	10.1007/s13341-017-0726-4
title_sort	age-dependent d-dimer cut-off for the elderly patient in the emergency room
title_auth	Age-dependent D-dimer cut-off for the elderly patient in the emergency room
abstract	Aims The pulmonary embolism (PE) incidence is increased in elderly patient. The conventional strategy to diagnose PE in elderly population is limited by the low specificity of D-dimer testing, and the interest of an ageadjusted D-dimer cut-off (10xage) was recently validated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of these new recommendations in our emergency department. Procedure We performed a retrospective study on all emergency patients aged 75 and older who were tested for PE in 2015 in our hospital. The primary objective of this study was to assess the use of the recommendation for age adjusted cut-off. Results One hundred and twenty six patients were enrolled. Thirty patients (24%) had negative D-dimer considering the age adjusted cut-off but higher than the usual threshold of 500 μg/l. In this group, four (13%) underwent a CT pulmonary angiogram, which means that emergency physicians applied the new guidelines in 87% cases (95% CI 70% - 97%). No PE was found among these four patients. Conclusion The age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off in elderly patients with suspicion of PE doesn’t seem to be well endorsed in our emergency department. © Société française de médecine d'urgence and Lavoisier 2017
abstractGer	Aims The pulmonary embolism (PE) incidence is increased in elderly patient. The conventional strategy to diagnose PE in elderly population is limited by the low specificity of D-dimer testing, and the interest of an ageadjusted D-dimer cut-off (10xage) was recently validated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of these new recommendations in our emergency department. Procedure We performed a retrospective study on all emergency patients aged 75 and older who were tested for PE in 2015 in our hospital. The primary objective of this study was to assess the use of the recommendation for age adjusted cut-off. Results One hundred and twenty six patients were enrolled. Thirty patients (24%) had negative D-dimer considering the age adjusted cut-off but higher than the usual threshold of 500 μg/l. In this group, four (13%) underwent a CT pulmonary angiogram, which means that emergency physicians applied the new guidelines in 87% cases (95% CI 70% - 97%). No PE was found among these four patients. Conclusion The age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off in elderly patients with suspicion of PE doesn’t seem to be well endorsed in our emergency department. © Société française de médecine d'urgence and Lavoisier 2017
abstract_unstemmed	Aims The pulmonary embolism (PE) incidence is increased in elderly patient. The conventional strategy to diagnose PE in elderly population is limited by the low specificity of D-dimer testing, and the interest of an ageadjusted D-dimer cut-off (10xage) was recently validated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of these new recommendations in our emergency department. Procedure We performed a retrospective study on all emergency patients aged 75 and older who were tested for PE in 2015 in our hospital. The primary objective of this study was to assess the use of the recommendation for age adjusted cut-off. Results One hundred and twenty six patients were enrolled. Thirty patients (24%) had negative D-dimer considering the age adjusted cut-off but higher than the usual threshold of 500 μg/l. In this group, four (13%) underwent a CT pulmonary angiogram, which means that emergency physicians applied the new guidelines in 87% cases (95% CI 70% - 97%). No PE was found among these four patients. Conclusion The age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off in elderly patients with suspicion of PE doesn’t seem to be well endorsed in our emergency department. © Société française de médecine d'urgence and Lavoisier 2017
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333
container_issue	2
title_short	Age-dependent D-dimer cut-off for the elderly patient in the emergency room
url	https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13341-017-0726-4
remote_bool	true
author2	Balia, D. Dubreucq, E. Roger, C. Hausfater, P. Freund, Y.
author2Str	Balia, D. Dubreucq, E. Roger, C. Hausfater, P. Freund, Y.
ppnlink	643826459
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1007/s13341-017-0726-4
up_date	2024-07-03T23:32:00.441Z
_version_	1803602645950136320
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR031397913</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519165202.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2017 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s13341-017-0726-4</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR031397913</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s13341-017-0726-4-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Paquet, A. L.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Age-dependent D-dimer cut-off for the elderly patient in the emergency room</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Société française de médecine d'urgence and Lavoisier 2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aims The pulmonary embolism (PE) incidence is increased in elderly patient. The conventional strategy to diagnose PE in elderly population is limited by the low specificity of D-dimer testing, and the interest of an ageadjusted D-dimer cut-off (10xage) was recently validated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of these new recommendations in our emergency department. Procedure We performed a retrospective study on all emergency patients aged 75 and older who were tested for PE in 2015 in our hospital. The primary objective of this study was to assess the use of the recommendation for age adjusted cut-off. Results One hundred and twenty six patients were enrolled. Thirty patients (24%) had negative D-dimer considering the age adjusted cut-off but higher than the usual threshold of 500 μg/l. In this group, four (13%) underwent a CT pulmonary angiogram, which means that emergency physicians applied the new guidelines in 87% cases (95% CI 70% - 97%). No PE was found among these four patients. Conclusion The age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off in elderly patients with suspicion of PE doesn’t seem to be well endorsed in our emergency department.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pulmonary embolism</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">D-dimer</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Elderly patient</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Age adjusted cut-off</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CT scanner</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Balia, D.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dubreucq, E.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Roger, C.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hausfater, P.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Freund, Y.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Annales françaises de médecine d'urgence</subfield><subfield code="d">Paris [u.a.] : Springer, 2011</subfield><subfield code="g">7(2017), 2 vom: 02. März, Seite 92-96</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)643826459</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2588257-0</subfield><subfield code="x">2108-6591</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:7</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:02</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:92-96</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13341-017-0726-4</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2070</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2086</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2116</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">7</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">02</subfield><subfield code="c">03</subfield><subfield code="h">92-96</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.3967133

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Age-dependent D-dimer cut-off for the elderly patient in the emergency room

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?