Going from classical to quantum description of bound charged particles II: Implications for the atomic physics

Abstract. This paper is the continuation of the analysis of bound quantum systems started in part I (A.L. Kholmetskii, T. Yarman and O.V. Missevitch, Going from classical to quantum description of bound charged particles. I: Basic concepts and assertions), which is based on a novel approach to the transition from classical to quantum description of electrically bound charges, involving the requirement of energy-momentum conservation for the bound electromagnetic (EM) field, when the EM radiation is forbidden. It has been shown that the modified expression for the energy levels of hydrogenic atoms within such a pure bound field theory (PBFT) provides the same gross and fine structure of energy levels, like in the standard theory. At the same time, at the scale of hyperfine interactions, our approach, in general, does evoke some important corrections to the energy levels. Part of such corrections, like the spin-spin splitting in the hydrogen atom, is less than the present theoretical/experimental uncertainties in the evaluation of hyperfine contributions into the atomic levels. But the most interesting result is the appearance of a number of significant corrections (the 1S -2S interval and 1S spin-spin interval in positronium, 1S and 2S -2P Lamb shift in light hydrogenic atoms), which improve considerably the convergence between theoretical predictions and experimental results. In particular, the corrected 1S -2S interval and 1S spin-spin splitting in positronium practically eliminate the existing up-to-date discrepancy between theoretical and experimental data. The re-estimated classic 2S -2P Lamb shift as well as ground-state Lamb shift in the hydrogen atom lead to the proton charge radius rp = 0.841(6) fm (from 2S -2P Lamb shift), and rp = 0.846(22) fm (from 1S Lamb shift), which perfectly agrees with the latest estimation of proton size via the measurement of 2S -2P Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen, i.e.rp = 0.84184(67) fm. Finally, we consider the decay of bound muons in meso-atoms and achieve a quantitative agreement between experimental data and the results obtained through our approach. Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Kholmetskii, A. L. [verfasserIn] Yarman, T. Missevitch, O. V.

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2011

Schlagwörter:	Lamb Shift Proton Charge Muonic Hydrogen Relativistic Dilation Proton Charge Radius

Anmerkung:	© Società Italiana di Fisica and Springer 2011

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: The European physical journal - Berlin : Springer, 2011, 126(2011), 4 vom: 11. Apr.
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:126 ; year:2011 ; number:4 ; day:11 ; month:04

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.1140/epjp/i2011-11035-7

Katalog-ID:	SPR031448577

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	SPR031448577
003	DE-627
005	20230331072706.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	201007s2011 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1140/epjp/i2011-11035-7 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)SPR031448577
035			\|a (SPR)i2011-11035-7-e
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
100	1		\|a Kholmetskii, A. L. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Going from classical to quantum description of bound charged particles II: Implications for the atomic physics
264		1	\|c 2011
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
500			\|a © Società Italiana di Fisica and Springer 2011
520			\|a Abstract. This paper is the continuation of the analysis of bound quantum systems started in part I (A.L. Kholmetskii, T. Yarman and O.V. Missevitch, Going from classical to quantum description of bound charged particles. I: Basic concepts and assertions), which is based on a novel approach to the transition from classical to quantum description of electrically bound charges, involving the requirement of energy-momentum conservation for the bound electromagnetic (EM) field, when the EM radiation is forbidden. It has been shown that the modified expression for the energy levels of hydrogenic atoms within such a pure bound field theory (PBFT) provides the same gross and fine structure of energy levels, like in the standard theory. At the same time, at the scale of hyperfine interactions, our approach, in general, does evoke some important corrections to the energy levels. Part of such corrections, like the spin-spin splitting in the hydrogen atom, is less than the present theoretical/experimental uncertainties in the evaluation of hyperfine contributions into the atomic levels. But the most interesting result is the appearance of a number of significant corrections (the 1S -2S interval and 1S spin-spin interval in positronium, 1S and 2S -2P Lamb shift in light hydrogenic atoms), which improve considerably the convergence between theoretical predictions and experimental results. In particular, the corrected 1S -2S interval and 1S spin-spin splitting in positronium practically eliminate the existing up-to-date discrepancy between theoretical and experimental data. The re-estimated classic 2S -2P Lamb shift as well as ground-state Lamb shift in the hydrogen atom lead to the proton charge radius rp = 0.841(6) fm (from 2S -2P Lamb shift), and rp = 0.846(22) fm (from 1S Lamb shift), which perfectly agrees with the latest estimation of proton size via the measurement of 2S -2P Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen, i.e.rp = 0.84184(67) fm. Finally, we consider the decay of bound muons in meso-atoms and achieve a quantitative agreement between experimental data and the results obtained through our approach.
650		4	\|a Lamb Shift \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Proton Charge \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Muonic Hydrogen \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Relativistic Dilation \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Proton Charge Radius \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
700	1		\|a Yarman, T. \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Missevitch, O. V. \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t The European physical journal \|d Berlin : Springer, 2011 \|g 126(2011), 4 vom: 11. Apr. \|w (DE-627)647653958 \|w (DE-600)2595693-0 \|x 2190-5444 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:126 \|g year:2011 \|g number:4 \|g day:11 \|g month:04
856	4	0	\|u https://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2011-11035-7 \|z lizenzpflichtig \|3 Volltext
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_SPRINGER
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_32
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_90
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_100
912			\|a GBV_ILN_101
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_120
912			\|a GBV_ILN_138
912			\|a GBV_ILN_150
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_171
912			\|a GBV_ILN_187
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_250
912			\|a GBV_ILN_281
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_636
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2001
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2004
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2006
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2007
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2008
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2010
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2015
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2020
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2021
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2025
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2026
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2027
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2031
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2034
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2038
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2039
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2044
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2048
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2049
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2050
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2057
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2059
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2061
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2064
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2065
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2068
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2070
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2086
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2088
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2093
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2106
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2107
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2108
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2113
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2116
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2118
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2119
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2122
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2129
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2143
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2144
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2147
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2148
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2153
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2188
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2190
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2232
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2336
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2446
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2470
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2472
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2507
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2522
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2548
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4046
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4242
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4246
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4251
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4333
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4334
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4336
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4393
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 126 \|j 2011 \|e 4 \|b 11 \|c 04

Indexfelder

author_variant	a l k al alk t y ty o v m ov ovm
matchkey_str	article:21905444:2011----::onfocasclounudsrpinfoncagdatceiipi
hierarchy_sort_str	2011
publishDate	2011
allfields	10.1140/epjp/i2011-11035-7 doi (DE-627)SPR031448577 (SPR)i2011-11035-7-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kholmetskii, A. L. verfasserin aut Going from classical to quantum description of bound charged particles II: Implications for the atomic physics 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Società Italiana di Fisica and Springer 2011 Abstract. This paper is the continuation of the analysis of bound quantum systems started in part I (A.L. Kholmetskii, T. Yarman and O.V. Missevitch, Going from classical to quantum description of bound charged particles. I: Basic concepts and assertions), which is based on a novel approach to the transition from classical to quantum description of electrically bound charges, involving the requirement of energy-momentum conservation for the bound electromagnetic (EM) field, when the EM radiation is forbidden. It has been shown that the modified expression for the energy levels of hydrogenic atoms within such a pure bound field theory (PBFT) provides the same gross and fine structure of energy levels, like in the standard theory. At the same time, at the scale of hyperfine interactions, our approach, in general, does evoke some important corrections to the energy levels. Part of such corrections, like the spin-spin splitting in the hydrogen atom, is less than the present theoretical/experimental uncertainties in the evaluation of hyperfine contributions into the atomic levels. But the most interesting result is the appearance of a number of significant corrections (the 1S -2S interval and 1S spin-spin interval in positronium, 1S and 2S -2P Lamb shift in light hydrogenic atoms), which improve considerably the convergence between theoretical predictions and experimental results. In particular, the corrected 1S -2S interval and 1S spin-spin splitting in positronium practically eliminate the existing up-to-date discrepancy between theoretical and experimental data. The re-estimated classic 2S -2P Lamb shift as well as ground-state Lamb shift in the hydrogen atom lead to the proton charge radius rp = 0.841(6) fm (from 2S -2P Lamb shift), and rp = 0.846(22) fm (from 1S Lamb shift), which perfectly agrees with the latest estimation of proton size via the measurement of 2S -2P Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen, i.e.rp = 0.84184(67) fm. Finally, we consider the decay of bound muons in meso-atoms and achieve a quantitative agreement between experimental data and the results obtained through our approach. Lamb Shift (dpeaa)DE-He213 Proton Charge (dpeaa)DE-He213 Muonic Hydrogen (dpeaa)DE-He213 Relativistic Dilation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Proton Charge Radius (dpeaa)DE-He213 Yarman, T. aut Missevitch, O. V. aut Enthalten in The European physical journal Berlin : Springer, 2011 126(2011), 4 vom: 11. Apr. (DE-627)647653958 (DE-600)2595693-0 2190-5444 nnns volume:126 year:2011 number:4 day:11 month:04 https://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2011-11035-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 126 2011 4 11 04
spelling	10.1140/epjp/i2011-11035-7 doi (DE-627)SPR031448577 (SPR)i2011-11035-7-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kholmetskii, A. L. verfasserin aut Going from classical to quantum description of bound charged particles II: Implications for the atomic physics 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Società Italiana di Fisica and Springer 2011 Abstract. This paper is the continuation of the analysis of bound quantum systems started in part I (A.L. Kholmetskii, T. Yarman and O.V. Missevitch, Going from classical to quantum description of bound charged particles. I: Basic concepts and assertions), which is based on a novel approach to the transition from classical to quantum description of electrically bound charges, involving the requirement of energy-momentum conservation for the bound electromagnetic (EM) field, when the EM radiation is forbidden. It has been shown that the modified expression for the energy levels of hydrogenic atoms within such a pure bound field theory (PBFT) provides the same gross and fine structure of energy levels, like in the standard theory. At the same time, at the scale of hyperfine interactions, our approach, in general, does evoke some important corrections to the energy levels. Part of such corrections, like the spin-spin splitting in the hydrogen atom, is less than the present theoretical/experimental uncertainties in the evaluation of hyperfine contributions into the atomic levels. But the most interesting result is the appearance of a number of significant corrections (the 1S -2S interval and 1S spin-spin interval in positronium, 1S and 2S -2P Lamb shift in light hydrogenic atoms), which improve considerably the convergence between theoretical predictions and experimental results. In particular, the corrected 1S -2S interval and 1S spin-spin splitting in positronium practically eliminate the existing up-to-date discrepancy between theoretical and experimental data. The re-estimated classic 2S -2P Lamb shift as well as ground-state Lamb shift in the hydrogen atom lead to the proton charge radius rp = 0.841(6) fm (from 2S -2P Lamb shift), and rp = 0.846(22) fm (from 1S Lamb shift), which perfectly agrees with the latest estimation of proton size via the measurement of 2S -2P Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen, i.e.rp = 0.84184(67) fm. Finally, we consider the decay of bound muons in meso-atoms and achieve a quantitative agreement between experimental data and the results obtained through our approach. Lamb Shift (dpeaa)DE-He213 Proton Charge (dpeaa)DE-He213 Muonic Hydrogen (dpeaa)DE-He213 Relativistic Dilation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Proton Charge Radius (dpeaa)DE-He213 Yarman, T. aut Missevitch, O. V. aut Enthalten in The European physical journal Berlin : Springer, 2011 126(2011), 4 vom: 11. Apr. (DE-627)647653958 (DE-600)2595693-0 2190-5444 nnns volume:126 year:2011 number:4 day:11 month:04 https://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2011-11035-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 126 2011 4 11 04
allfields_unstemmed	10.1140/epjp/i2011-11035-7 doi (DE-627)SPR031448577 (SPR)i2011-11035-7-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kholmetskii, A. L. verfasserin aut Going from classical to quantum description of bound charged particles II: Implications for the atomic physics 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Società Italiana di Fisica and Springer 2011 Abstract. This paper is the continuation of the analysis of bound quantum systems started in part I (A.L. Kholmetskii, T. Yarman and O.V. Missevitch, Going from classical to quantum description of bound charged particles. I: Basic concepts and assertions), which is based on a novel approach to the transition from classical to quantum description of electrically bound charges, involving the requirement of energy-momentum conservation for the bound electromagnetic (EM) field, when the EM radiation is forbidden. It has been shown that the modified expression for the energy levels of hydrogenic atoms within such a pure bound field theory (PBFT) provides the same gross and fine structure of energy levels, like in the standard theory. At the same time, at the scale of hyperfine interactions, our approach, in general, does evoke some important corrections to the energy levels. Part of such corrections, like the spin-spin splitting in the hydrogen atom, is less than the present theoretical/experimental uncertainties in the evaluation of hyperfine contributions into the atomic levels. But the most interesting result is the appearance of a number of significant corrections (the 1S -2S interval and 1S spin-spin interval in positronium, 1S and 2S -2P Lamb shift in light hydrogenic atoms), which improve considerably the convergence between theoretical predictions and experimental results. In particular, the corrected 1S -2S interval and 1S spin-spin splitting in positronium practically eliminate the existing up-to-date discrepancy between theoretical and experimental data. The re-estimated classic 2S -2P Lamb shift as well as ground-state Lamb shift in the hydrogen atom lead to the proton charge radius rp = 0.841(6) fm (from 2S -2P Lamb shift), and rp = 0.846(22) fm (from 1S Lamb shift), which perfectly agrees with the latest estimation of proton size via the measurement of 2S -2P Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen, i.e.rp = 0.84184(67) fm. Finally, we consider the decay of bound muons in meso-atoms and achieve a quantitative agreement between experimental data and the results obtained through our approach. Lamb Shift (dpeaa)DE-He213 Proton Charge (dpeaa)DE-He213 Muonic Hydrogen (dpeaa)DE-He213 Relativistic Dilation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Proton Charge Radius (dpeaa)DE-He213 Yarman, T. aut Missevitch, O. V. aut Enthalten in The European physical journal Berlin : Springer, 2011 126(2011), 4 vom: 11. Apr. (DE-627)647653958 (DE-600)2595693-0 2190-5444 nnns volume:126 year:2011 number:4 day:11 month:04 https://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2011-11035-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 126 2011 4 11 04
allfieldsGer	10.1140/epjp/i2011-11035-7 doi (DE-627)SPR031448577 (SPR)i2011-11035-7-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kholmetskii, A. L. verfasserin aut Going from classical to quantum description of bound charged particles II: Implications for the atomic physics 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Società Italiana di Fisica and Springer 2011 Abstract. This paper is the continuation of the analysis of bound quantum systems started in part I (A.L. Kholmetskii, T. Yarman and O.V. Missevitch, Going from classical to quantum description of bound charged particles. I: Basic concepts and assertions), which is based on a novel approach to the transition from classical to quantum description of electrically bound charges, involving the requirement of energy-momentum conservation for the bound electromagnetic (EM) field, when the EM radiation is forbidden. It has been shown that the modified expression for the energy levels of hydrogenic atoms within such a pure bound field theory (PBFT) provides the same gross and fine structure of energy levels, like in the standard theory. At the same time, at the scale of hyperfine interactions, our approach, in general, does evoke some important corrections to the energy levels. Part of such corrections, like the spin-spin splitting in the hydrogen atom, is less than the present theoretical/experimental uncertainties in the evaluation of hyperfine contributions into the atomic levels. But the most interesting result is the appearance of a number of significant corrections (the 1S -2S interval and 1S spin-spin interval in positronium, 1S and 2S -2P Lamb shift in light hydrogenic atoms), which improve considerably the convergence between theoretical predictions and experimental results. In particular, the corrected 1S -2S interval and 1S spin-spin splitting in positronium practically eliminate the existing up-to-date discrepancy between theoretical and experimental data. The re-estimated classic 2S -2P Lamb shift as well as ground-state Lamb shift in the hydrogen atom lead to the proton charge radius rp = 0.841(6) fm (from 2S -2P Lamb shift), and rp = 0.846(22) fm (from 1S Lamb shift), which perfectly agrees with the latest estimation of proton size via the measurement of 2S -2P Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen, i.e.rp = 0.84184(67) fm. Finally, we consider the decay of bound muons in meso-atoms and achieve a quantitative agreement between experimental data and the results obtained through our approach. Lamb Shift (dpeaa)DE-He213 Proton Charge (dpeaa)DE-He213 Muonic Hydrogen (dpeaa)DE-He213 Relativistic Dilation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Proton Charge Radius (dpeaa)DE-He213 Yarman, T. aut Missevitch, O. V. aut Enthalten in The European physical journal Berlin : Springer, 2011 126(2011), 4 vom: 11. Apr. (DE-627)647653958 (DE-600)2595693-0 2190-5444 nnns volume:126 year:2011 number:4 day:11 month:04 https://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2011-11035-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 126 2011 4 11 04
allfieldsSound	10.1140/epjp/i2011-11035-7 doi (DE-627)SPR031448577 (SPR)i2011-11035-7-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kholmetskii, A. L. verfasserin aut Going from classical to quantum description of bound charged particles II: Implications for the atomic physics 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Società Italiana di Fisica and Springer 2011 Abstract. This paper is the continuation of the analysis of bound quantum systems started in part I (A.L. Kholmetskii, T. Yarman and O.V. Missevitch, Going from classical to quantum description of bound charged particles. I: Basic concepts and assertions), which is based on a novel approach to the transition from classical to quantum description of electrically bound charges, involving the requirement of energy-momentum conservation for the bound electromagnetic (EM) field, when the EM radiation is forbidden. It has been shown that the modified expression for the energy levels of hydrogenic atoms within such a pure bound field theory (PBFT) provides the same gross and fine structure of energy levels, like in the standard theory. At the same time, at the scale of hyperfine interactions, our approach, in general, does evoke some important corrections to the energy levels. Part of such corrections, like the spin-spin splitting in the hydrogen atom, is less than the present theoretical/experimental uncertainties in the evaluation of hyperfine contributions into the atomic levels. But the most interesting result is the appearance of a number of significant corrections (the 1S -2S interval and 1S spin-spin interval in positronium, 1S and 2S -2P Lamb shift in light hydrogenic atoms), which improve considerably the convergence between theoretical predictions and experimental results. In particular, the corrected 1S -2S interval and 1S spin-spin splitting in positronium practically eliminate the existing up-to-date discrepancy between theoretical and experimental data. The re-estimated classic 2S -2P Lamb shift as well as ground-state Lamb shift in the hydrogen atom lead to the proton charge radius rp = 0.841(6) fm (from 2S -2P Lamb shift), and rp = 0.846(22) fm (from 1S Lamb shift), which perfectly agrees with the latest estimation of proton size via the measurement of 2S -2P Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen, i.e.rp = 0.84184(67) fm. Finally, we consider the decay of bound muons in meso-atoms and achieve a quantitative agreement between experimental data and the results obtained through our approach. Lamb Shift (dpeaa)DE-He213 Proton Charge (dpeaa)DE-He213 Muonic Hydrogen (dpeaa)DE-He213 Relativistic Dilation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Proton Charge Radius (dpeaa)DE-He213 Yarman, T. aut Missevitch, O. V. aut Enthalten in The European physical journal Berlin : Springer, 2011 126(2011), 4 vom: 11. Apr. (DE-627)647653958 (DE-600)2595693-0 2190-5444 nnns volume:126 year:2011 number:4 day:11 month:04 https://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2011-11035-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 126 2011 4 11 04
language	English
source	Enthalten in The European physical journal 126(2011), 4 vom: 11. Apr. volume:126 year:2011 number:4 day:11 month:04
sourceStr	Enthalten in The European physical journal 126(2011), 4 vom: 11. Apr. volume:126 year:2011 number:4 day:11 month:04
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Lamb Shift Proton Charge Muonic Hydrogen Relativistic Dilation Proton Charge Radius
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	The European physical journal
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Kholmetskii, A. L. @@aut@@ Yarman, T. @@aut@@ Missevitch, O. V. @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2011-04-11T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	647653958
id	SPR031448577
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR031448577</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230331072706.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2011 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1140/epjp/i2011-11035-7</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR031448577</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)i2011-11035-7-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kholmetskii, A. L.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Going from classical to quantum description of bound charged particles II: Implications for the atomic physics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Società Italiana di Fisica and Springer 2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract. This paper is the continuation of the analysis of bound quantum systems started in part I (A.L. Kholmetskii, T. Yarman and O.V. Missevitch, Going from classical to quantum description of bound charged particles. I: Basic concepts and assertions), which is based on a novel approach to the transition from classical to quantum description of electrically bound charges, involving the requirement of energy-momentum conservation for the bound electromagnetic (EM) field, when the EM radiation is forbidden. It has been shown that the modified expression for the energy levels of hydrogenic atoms within such a pure bound field theory (PBFT) provides the same gross and fine structure of energy levels, like in the standard theory. At the same time, at the scale of hyperfine interactions, our approach, in general, does evoke some important corrections to the energy levels. Part of such corrections, like the spin-spin splitting in the hydrogen atom, is less than the present theoretical/experimental uncertainties in the evaluation of hyperfine contributions into the atomic levels. But the most interesting result is the appearance of a number of significant corrections (the 1S -2S interval and 1S spin-spin interval in positronium, 1S and 2S -2P Lamb shift in light hydrogenic atoms), which improve considerably the convergence between theoretical predictions and experimental results. In particular, the corrected 1S -2S interval and 1S spin-spin splitting in positronium practically eliminate the existing up-to-date discrepancy between theoretical and experimental data. The re-estimated classic 2S -2P Lamb shift as well as ground-state Lamb shift in the hydrogen atom lead to the proton charge radius rp = 0.841(6) fm (from 2S -2P Lamb shift), and rp = 0.846(22) fm (from 1S Lamb shift), which perfectly agrees with the latest estimation of proton size via the measurement of 2S -2P Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen, i.e.rp = 0.84184(67) fm. Finally, we consider the decay of bound muons in meso-atoms and achieve a quantitative agreement between experimental data and the results obtained through our approach.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Lamb Shift</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Proton Charge</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Muonic Hydrogen</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Relativistic Dilation</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Proton Charge Radius</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yarman, T.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Missevitch, O. V.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The European physical journal</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : Springer, 2011</subfield><subfield code="g">126(2011), 4 vom: 11. Apr.</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)647653958</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2595693-0</subfield><subfield code="x">2190-5444</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:126</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2011</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">day:11</subfield><subfield code="g">month:04</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2011-11035-7</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2070</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2086</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2116</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">126</subfield><subfield code="j">2011</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="b">11</subfield><subfield code="c">04</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Kholmetskii, A. L.
spellingShingle	Kholmetskii, A. L. misc Lamb Shift misc Proton Charge misc Muonic Hydrogen misc Relativistic Dilation misc Proton Charge Radius Going from classical to quantum description of bound charged particles II: Implications for the atomic physics
authorStr	Kholmetskii, A. L.
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)647653958
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut
collection	springer
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	2190-5444
topic_title	Going from classical to quantum description of bound charged particles II: Implications for the atomic physics Lamb Shift (dpeaa)DE-He213 Proton Charge (dpeaa)DE-He213 Muonic Hydrogen (dpeaa)DE-He213 Relativistic Dilation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Proton Charge Radius (dpeaa)DE-He213
topic	misc Lamb Shift misc Proton Charge misc Muonic Hydrogen misc Relativistic Dilation misc Proton Charge Radius
topic_unstemmed	misc Lamb Shift misc Proton Charge misc Muonic Hydrogen misc Relativistic Dilation misc Proton Charge Radius
topic_browse	misc Lamb Shift misc Proton Charge misc Muonic Hydrogen misc Relativistic Dilation misc Proton Charge Radius
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	The European physical journal
hierarchy_parent_id	647653958
hierarchy_top_title	The European physical journal
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)647653958 (DE-600)2595693-0
title	Going from classical to quantum description of bound charged particles II: Implications for the atomic physics
ctrlnum	(DE-627)SPR031448577 (SPR)i2011-11035-7-e
title_full	Going from classical to quantum description of bound charged particles II: Implications for the atomic physics
author_sort	Kholmetskii, A. L.
journal	The European physical journal
journalStr	The European physical journal
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2011
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Kholmetskii, A. L. Yarman, T. Missevitch, O. V.
container_volume	126
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Kholmetskii, A. L.
doi_str_mv	10.1140/epjp/i2011-11035-7
title_sort	going from classical to quantum description of bound charged particles ii: implications for the atomic physics
title_auth	Going from classical to quantum description of bound charged particles II: Implications for the atomic physics
abstract	Abstract. This paper is the continuation of the analysis of bound quantum systems started in part I (A.L. Kholmetskii, T. Yarman and O.V. Missevitch, Going from classical to quantum description of bound charged particles. I: Basic concepts and assertions), which is based on a novel approach to the transition from classical to quantum description of electrically bound charges, involving the requirement of energy-momentum conservation for the bound electromagnetic (EM) field, when the EM radiation is forbidden. It has been shown that the modified expression for the energy levels of hydrogenic atoms within such a pure bound field theory (PBFT) provides the same gross and fine structure of energy levels, like in the standard theory. At the same time, at the scale of hyperfine interactions, our approach, in general, does evoke some important corrections to the energy levels. Part of such corrections, like the spin-spin splitting in the hydrogen atom, is less than the present theoretical/experimental uncertainties in the evaluation of hyperfine contributions into the atomic levels. But the most interesting result is the appearance of a number of significant corrections (the 1S -2S interval and 1S spin-spin interval in positronium, 1S and 2S -2P Lamb shift in light hydrogenic atoms), which improve considerably the convergence between theoretical predictions and experimental results. In particular, the corrected 1S -2S interval and 1S spin-spin splitting in positronium practically eliminate the existing up-to-date discrepancy between theoretical and experimental data. The re-estimated classic 2S -2P Lamb shift as well as ground-state Lamb shift in the hydrogen atom lead to the proton charge radius rp = 0.841(6) fm (from 2S -2P Lamb shift), and rp = 0.846(22) fm (from 1S Lamb shift), which perfectly agrees with the latest estimation of proton size via the measurement of 2S -2P Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen, i.e.rp = 0.84184(67) fm. Finally, we consider the decay of bound muons in meso-atoms and achieve a quantitative agreement between experimental data and the results obtained through our approach. © Società Italiana di Fisica and Springer 2011
abstractGer	Abstract. This paper is the continuation of the analysis of bound quantum systems started in part I (A.L. Kholmetskii, T. Yarman and O.V. Missevitch, Going from classical to quantum description of bound charged particles. I: Basic concepts and assertions), which is based on a novel approach to the transition from classical to quantum description of electrically bound charges, involving the requirement of energy-momentum conservation for the bound electromagnetic (EM) field, when the EM radiation is forbidden. It has been shown that the modified expression for the energy levels of hydrogenic atoms within such a pure bound field theory (PBFT) provides the same gross and fine structure of energy levels, like in the standard theory. At the same time, at the scale of hyperfine interactions, our approach, in general, does evoke some important corrections to the energy levels. Part of such corrections, like the spin-spin splitting in the hydrogen atom, is less than the present theoretical/experimental uncertainties in the evaluation of hyperfine contributions into the atomic levels. But the most interesting result is the appearance of a number of significant corrections (the 1S -2S interval and 1S spin-spin interval in positronium, 1S and 2S -2P Lamb shift in light hydrogenic atoms), which improve considerably the convergence between theoretical predictions and experimental results. In particular, the corrected 1S -2S interval and 1S spin-spin splitting in positronium practically eliminate the existing up-to-date discrepancy between theoretical and experimental data. The re-estimated classic 2S -2P Lamb shift as well as ground-state Lamb shift in the hydrogen atom lead to the proton charge radius rp = 0.841(6) fm (from 2S -2P Lamb shift), and rp = 0.846(22) fm (from 1S Lamb shift), which perfectly agrees with the latest estimation of proton size via the measurement of 2S -2P Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen, i.e.rp = 0.84184(67) fm. Finally, we consider the decay of bound muons in meso-atoms and achieve a quantitative agreement between experimental data and the results obtained through our approach. © Società Italiana di Fisica and Springer 2011
abstract_unstemmed	Abstract. This paper is the continuation of the analysis of bound quantum systems started in part I (A.L. Kholmetskii, T. Yarman and O.V. Missevitch, Going from classical to quantum description of bound charged particles. I: Basic concepts and assertions), which is based on a novel approach to the transition from classical to quantum description of electrically bound charges, involving the requirement of energy-momentum conservation for the bound electromagnetic (EM) field, when the EM radiation is forbidden. It has been shown that the modified expression for the energy levels of hydrogenic atoms within such a pure bound field theory (PBFT) provides the same gross and fine structure of energy levels, like in the standard theory. At the same time, at the scale of hyperfine interactions, our approach, in general, does evoke some important corrections to the energy levels. Part of such corrections, like the spin-spin splitting in the hydrogen atom, is less than the present theoretical/experimental uncertainties in the evaluation of hyperfine contributions into the atomic levels. But the most interesting result is the appearance of a number of significant corrections (the 1S -2S interval and 1S spin-spin interval in positronium, 1S and 2S -2P Lamb shift in light hydrogenic atoms), which improve considerably the convergence between theoretical predictions and experimental results. In particular, the corrected 1S -2S interval and 1S spin-spin splitting in positronium practically eliminate the existing up-to-date discrepancy between theoretical and experimental data. The re-estimated classic 2S -2P Lamb shift as well as ground-state Lamb shift in the hydrogen atom lead to the proton charge radius rp = 0.841(6) fm (from 2S -2P Lamb shift), and rp = 0.846(22) fm (from 1S Lamb shift), which perfectly agrees with the latest estimation of proton size via the measurement of 2S -2P Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen, i.e.rp = 0.84184(67) fm. Finally, we consider the decay of bound muons in meso-atoms and achieve a quantitative agreement between experimental data and the results obtained through our approach. © Società Italiana di Fisica and Springer 2011
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2070 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	4
title_short	Going from classical to quantum description of bound charged particles II: Implications for the atomic physics
url	https://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2011-11035-7
remote_bool	true
author2	Yarman, T. Missevitch, O. V.
author2Str	Yarman, T. Missevitch, O. V.
ppnlink	647653958
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1140/epjp/i2011-11035-7
up_date	2024-07-03T23:46:26.151Z
_version_	1803603553709719552
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR031448577</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230331072706.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2011 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1140/epjp/i2011-11035-7</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR031448577</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)i2011-11035-7-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kholmetskii, A. L.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Going from classical to quantum description of bound charged particles II: Implications for the atomic physics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Società Italiana di Fisica and Springer 2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract. This paper is the continuation of the analysis of bound quantum systems started in part I (A.L. Kholmetskii, T. Yarman and O.V. Missevitch, Going from classical to quantum description of bound charged particles. I: Basic concepts and assertions), which is based on a novel approach to the transition from classical to quantum description of electrically bound charges, involving the requirement of energy-momentum conservation for the bound electromagnetic (EM) field, when the EM radiation is forbidden. It has been shown that the modified expression for the energy levels of hydrogenic atoms within such a pure bound field theory (PBFT) provides the same gross and fine structure of energy levels, like in the standard theory. At the same time, at the scale of hyperfine interactions, our approach, in general, does evoke some important corrections to the energy levels. Part of such corrections, like the spin-spin splitting in the hydrogen atom, is less than the present theoretical/experimental uncertainties in the evaluation of hyperfine contributions into the atomic levels. But the most interesting result is the appearance of a number of significant corrections (the 1S -2S interval and 1S spin-spin interval in positronium, 1S and 2S -2P Lamb shift in light hydrogenic atoms), which improve considerably the convergence between theoretical predictions and experimental results. In particular, the corrected 1S -2S interval and 1S spin-spin splitting in positronium practically eliminate the existing up-to-date discrepancy between theoretical and experimental data. The re-estimated classic 2S -2P Lamb shift as well as ground-state Lamb shift in the hydrogen atom lead to the proton charge radius rp = 0.841(6) fm (from 2S -2P Lamb shift), and rp = 0.846(22) fm (from 1S Lamb shift), which perfectly agrees with the latest estimation of proton size via the measurement of 2S -2P Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen, i.e.rp = 0.84184(67) fm. Finally, we consider the decay of bound muons in meso-atoms and achieve a quantitative agreement between experimental data and the results obtained through our approach.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Lamb Shift</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Proton Charge</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Muonic Hydrogen</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Relativistic Dilation</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Proton Charge Radius</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yarman, T.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Missevitch, O. V.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The European physical journal</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : Springer, 2011</subfield><subfield code="g">126(2011), 4 vom: 11. Apr.</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)647653958</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2595693-0</subfield><subfield code="x">2190-5444</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:126</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2011</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">day:11</subfield><subfield code="g">month:04</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2011-11035-7</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2070</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2086</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2116</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">126</subfield><subfield code="j">2011</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="b">11</subfield><subfield code="c">04</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.4013157

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Going from classical to quantum description of bound charged particles II: Implications for the atomic physics

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?