Hand mental rotation is not systematically altered by actual body position: Laterality judgment versus same–different comparison tasks

Abstract It is commonly believed that during mental rotation of body parts, participants tend to imagine their own body part moving toward the stimulus, thus using an egocentric strategy. Several studies have also shown that the mental rotation of hands is affected by the actual hand position, espec...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Hoyek, Nady [verfasserIn] Di Rienzo, Franck Collet, Christian Creveaux, Thomas Guillot, Aymeric

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2013

Schlagwörter:	Mental rotation Motor imagery Hand laterality Egocentric/allocentric strategies

Anmerkung:	© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2013

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Perception & psychophysics - New York, NY : Springer, 1966, 76(2013), 2 vom: 30. Okt., Seite 519-526
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:76 ; year:2013 ; number:2 ; day:30 ; month:10 ; pages:519-526

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.3758/s13414-013-0577-z

Katalog-ID:	SPR031626750

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	SPR031626750
003	DE-627
005	20230507184311.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	201007s2013 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.3758/s13414-013-0577-z \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)SPR031626750
035			\|a (SPR)s13414-013-0577-z-e
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
100	1		\|a Hoyek, Nady \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Hand mental rotation is not systematically altered by actual body position: Laterality judgment versus same–different comparison tasks
264		1	\|c 2013
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
500			\|a © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2013
520			\|a Abstract It is commonly believed that during mental rotation of body parts, participants tend to imagine their own body part moving toward the stimulus, thus using an egocentric strategy. Several studies have also shown that the mental rotation of hands is affected by the actual hand position, especially if the hand is kept in an awkward position. However, this hand posture effect, as well as the use of an egocentric strategy during mental rotation of body parts, is not systematic. Several experiments have demonstrated that manipulating the stimulus features or the paradigm could induce a shift to visual and allocentric strategies. Here, we studied the effects of hand posture and biomechanical constraints on one-hand mental rotation (laterality judgment task), two-hand mental rotation (same–different judgment task), and mental rotation of one or two alphanumeric symbols (control tasks). Effects of posture and biomechanical constraints were observed solely for the laterality judgment task. Response times in the same–different hand mental rotation items were influenced by the angular disparity between the stimuli. We interpreted our result as evidence of the use of different strategies for each task. Future research should focus on disentangling the exact subprocesses in which an egocentric strategy is used, in order to propose better tests for participants with motor impairments.
650		4	\|a Mental rotation \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Motor imagery \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Hand laterality \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Egocentric/allocentric strategies \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
700	1		\|a Di Rienzo, Franck \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Collet, Christian \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Creveaux, Thomas \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Guillot, Aymeric \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Perception & psychophysics \|d New York, NY : Springer, 1966 \|g 76(2013), 2 vom: 30. Okt., Seite 519-526 \|w (DE-627)32818795X \|w (DE-600)2045204-4 \|x 1532-5962 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:76 \|g year:2013 \|g number:2 \|g day:30 \|g month:10 \|g pages:519-526
856	4	0	\|u https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0577-z \|z lizenzpflichtig \|3 Volltext
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_SPRINGER
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_32
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_90
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_100
912			\|a GBV_ILN_101
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_120
912			\|a GBV_ILN_138
912			\|a GBV_ILN_152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_171
912			\|a GBV_ILN_187
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_250
912			\|a GBV_ILN_281
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2020
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 76 \|j 2013 \|e 2 \|b 30 \|c 10 \|h 519-526

Indexfelder

author_variant	n h nh r f d rf rfd c c cc t c tc a g ag
matchkey_str	article:15325962:2013----::adetloainsosseaialatrdyculoyoiinaeaiyugetes
hierarchy_sort_str	2013
publishDate	2013
allfields	10.3758/s13414-013-0577-z doi (DE-627)SPR031626750 (SPR)s13414-013-0577-z-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Hoyek, Nady verfasserin aut Hand mental rotation is not systematically altered by actual body position: Laterality judgment versus same–different comparison tasks 2013 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2013 Abstract It is commonly believed that during mental rotation of body parts, participants tend to imagine their own body part moving toward the stimulus, thus using an egocentric strategy. Several studies have also shown that the mental rotation of hands is affected by the actual hand position, especially if the hand is kept in an awkward position. However, this hand posture effect, as well as the use of an egocentric strategy during mental rotation of body parts, is not systematic. Several experiments have demonstrated that manipulating the stimulus features or the paradigm could induce a shift to visual and allocentric strategies. Here, we studied the effects of hand posture and biomechanical constraints on one-hand mental rotation (laterality judgment task), two-hand mental rotation (same–different judgment task), and mental rotation of one or two alphanumeric symbols (control tasks). Effects of posture and biomechanical constraints were observed solely for the laterality judgment task. Response times in the same–different hand mental rotation items were influenced by the angular disparity between the stimuli. We interpreted our result as evidence of the use of different strategies for each task. Future research should focus on disentangling the exact subprocesses in which an egocentric strategy is used, in order to propose better tests for participants with motor impairments. Mental rotation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Motor imagery (dpeaa)DE-He213 Hand laterality (dpeaa)DE-He213 Egocentric/allocentric strategies (dpeaa)DE-He213 Di Rienzo, Franck aut Collet, Christian aut Creveaux, Thomas aut Guillot, Aymeric aut Enthalten in Perception & psychophysics New York, NY : Springer, 1966 76(2013), 2 vom: 30. Okt., Seite 519-526 (DE-627)32818795X (DE-600)2045204-4 1532-5962 nnns volume:76 year:2013 number:2 day:30 month:10 pages:519-526 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0577-z lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2020 AR 76 2013 2 30 10 519-526
spelling	10.3758/s13414-013-0577-z doi (DE-627)SPR031626750 (SPR)s13414-013-0577-z-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Hoyek, Nady verfasserin aut Hand mental rotation is not systematically altered by actual body position: Laterality judgment versus same–different comparison tasks 2013 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2013 Abstract It is commonly believed that during mental rotation of body parts, participants tend to imagine their own body part moving toward the stimulus, thus using an egocentric strategy. Several studies have also shown that the mental rotation of hands is affected by the actual hand position, especially if the hand is kept in an awkward position. However, this hand posture effect, as well as the use of an egocentric strategy during mental rotation of body parts, is not systematic. Several experiments have demonstrated that manipulating the stimulus features or the paradigm could induce a shift to visual and allocentric strategies. Here, we studied the effects of hand posture and biomechanical constraints on one-hand mental rotation (laterality judgment task), two-hand mental rotation (same–different judgment task), and mental rotation of one or two alphanumeric symbols (control tasks). Effects of posture and biomechanical constraints were observed solely for the laterality judgment task. Response times in the same–different hand mental rotation items were influenced by the angular disparity between the stimuli. We interpreted our result as evidence of the use of different strategies for each task. Future research should focus on disentangling the exact subprocesses in which an egocentric strategy is used, in order to propose better tests for participants with motor impairments. Mental rotation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Motor imagery (dpeaa)DE-He213 Hand laterality (dpeaa)DE-He213 Egocentric/allocentric strategies (dpeaa)DE-He213 Di Rienzo, Franck aut Collet, Christian aut Creveaux, Thomas aut Guillot, Aymeric aut Enthalten in Perception & psychophysics New York, NY : Springer, 1966 76(2013), 2 vom: 30. Okt., Seite 519-526 (DE-627)32818795X (DE-600)2045204-4 1532-5962 nnns volume:76 year:2013 number:2 day:30 month:10 pages:519-526 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0577-z lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2020 AR 76 2013 2 30 10 519-526
allfields_unstemmed	10.3758/s13414-013-0577-z doi (DE-627)SPR031626750 (SPR)s13414-013-0577-z-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Hoyek, Nady verfasserin aut Hand mental rotation is not systematically altered by actual body position: Laterality judgment versus same–different comparison tasks 2013 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2013 Abstract It is commonly believed that during mental rotation of body parts, participants tend to imagine their own body part moving toward the stimulus, thus using an egocentric strategy. Several studies have also shown that the mental rotation of hands is affected by the actual hand position, especially if the hand is kept in an awkward position. However, this hand posture effect, as well as the use of an egocentric strategy during mental rotation of body parts, is not systematic. Several experiments have demonstrated that manipulating the stimulus features or the paradigm could induce a shift to visual and allocentric strategies. Here, we studied the effects of hand posture and biomechanical constraints on one-hand mental rotation (laterality judgment task), two-hand mental rotation (same–different judgment task), and mental rotation of one or two alphanumeric symbols (control tasks). Effects of posture and biomechanical constraints were observed solely for the laterality judgment task. Response times in the same–different hand mental rotation items were influenced by the angular disparity between the stimuli. We interpreted our result as evidence of the use of different strategies for each task. Future research should focus on disentangling the exact subprocesses in which an egocentric strategy is used, in order to propose better tests for participants with motor impairments. Mental rotation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Motor imagery (dpeaa)DE-He213 Hand laterality (dpeaa)DE-He213 Egocentric/allocentric strategies (dpeaa)DE-He213 Di Rienzo, Franck aut Collet, Christian aut Creveaux, Thomas aut Guillot, Aymeric aut Enthalten in Perception & psychophysics New York, NY : Springer, 1966 76(2013), 2 vom: 30. Okt., Seite 519-526 (DE-627)32818795X (DE-600)2045204-4 1532-5962 nnns volume:76 year:2013 number:2 day:30 month:10 pages:519-526 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0577-z lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2020 AR 76 2013 2 30 10 519-526
allfieldsGer	10.3758/s13414-013-0577-z doi (DE-627)SPR031626750 (SPR)s13414-013-0577-z-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Hoyek, Nady verfasserin aut Hand mental rotation is not systematically altered by actual body position: Laterality judgment versus same–different comparison tasks 2013 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2013 Abstract It is commonly believed that during mental rotation of body parts, participants tend to imagine their own body part moving toward the stimulus, thus using an egocentric strategy. Several studies have also shown that the mental rotation of hands is affected by the actual hand position, especially if the hand is kept in an awkward position. However, this hand posture effect, as well as the use of an egocentric strategy during mental rotation of body parts, is not systematic. Several experiments have demonstrated that manipulating the stimulus features or the paradigm could induce a shift to visual and allocentric strategies. Here, we studied the effects of hand posture and biomechanical constraints on one-hand mental rotation (laterality judgment task), two-hand mental rotation (same–different judgment task), and mental rotation of one or two alphanumeric symbols (control tasks). Effects of posture and biomechanical constraints were observed solely for the laterality judgment task. Response times in the same–different hand mental rotation items were influenced by the angular disparity between the stimuli. We interpreted our result as evidence of the use of different strategies for each task. Future research should focus on disentangling the exact subprocesses in which an egocentric strategy is used, in order to propose better tests for participants with motor impairments. Mental rotation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Motor imagery (dpeaa)DE-He213 Hand laterality (dpeaa)DE-He213 Egocentric/allocentric strategies (dpeaa)DE-He213 Di Rienzo, Franck aut Collet, Christian aut Creveaux, Thomas aut Guillot, Aymeric aut Enthalten in Perception & psychophysics New York, NY : Springer, 1966 76(2013), 2 vom: 30. Okt., Seite 519-526 (DE-627)32818795X (DE-600)2045204-4 1532-5962 nnns volume:76 year:2013 number:2 day:30 month:10 pages:519-526 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0577-z lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2020 AR 76 2013 2 30 10 519-526
allfieldsSound	10.3758/s13414-013-0577-z doi (DE-627)SPR031626750 (SPR)s13414-013-0577-z-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Hoyek, Nady verfasserin aut Hand mental rotation is not systematically altered by actual body position: Laterality judgment versus same–different comparison tasks 2013 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2013 Abstract It is commonly believed that during mental rotation of body parts, participants tend to imagine their own body part moving toward the stimulus, thus using an egocentric strategy. Several studies have also shown that the mental rotation of hands is affected by the actual hand position, especially if the hand is kept in an awkward position. However, this hand posture effect, as well as the use of an egocentric strategy during mental rotation of body parts, is not systematic. Several experiments have demonstrated that manipulating the stimulus features or the paradigm could induce a shift to visual and allocentric strategies. Here, we studied the effects of hand posture and biomechanical constraints on one-hand mental rotation (laterality judgment task), two-hand mental rotation (same–different judgment task), and mental rotation of one or two alphanumeric symbols (control tasks). Effects of posture and biomechanical constraints were observed solely for the laterality judgment task. Response times in the same–different hand mental rotation items were influenced by the angular disparity between the stimuli. We interpreted our result as evidence of the use of different strategies for each task. Future research should focus on disentangling the exact subprocesses in which an egocentric strategy is used, in order to propose better tests for participants with motor impairments. Mental rotation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Motor imagery (dpeaa)DE-He213 Hand laterality (dpeaa)DE-He213 Egocentric/allocentric strategies (dpeaa)DE-He213 Di Rienzo, Franck aut Collet, Christian aut Creveaux, Thomas aut Guillot, Aymeric aut Enthalten in Perception & psychophysics New York, NY : Springer, 1966 76(2013), 2 vom: 30. Okt., Seite 519-526 (DE-627)32818795X (DE-600)2045204-4 1532-5962 nnns volume:76 year:2013 number:2 day:30 month:10 pages:519-526 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0577-z lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2020 AR 76 2013 2 30 10 519-526
language	English
source	Enthalten in Perception & psychophysics 76(2013), 2 vom: 30. Okt., Seite 519-526 volume:76 year:2013 number:2 day:30 month:10 pages:519-526
sourceStr	Enthalten in Perception & psychophysics 76(2013), 2 vom: 30. Okt., Seite 519-526 volume:76 year:2013 number:2 day:30 month:10 pages:519-526
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Mental rotation Motor imagery Hand laterality Egocentric/allocentric strategies
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	Perception & psychophysics
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Hoyek, Nady @@aut@@ Di Rienzo, Franck @@aut@@ Collet, Christian @@aut@@ Creveaux, Thomas @@aut@@ Guillot, Aymeric @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2013-10-30T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	32818795X
id	SPR031626750
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR031626750</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230507184311.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2013 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3758/s13414-013-0577-z</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR031626750</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s13414-013-0577-z-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hoyek, Nady</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Hand mental rotation is not systematically altered by actual body position: Laterality judgment versus same–different comparison tasks</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract It is commonly believed that during mental rotation of body parts, participants tend to imagine their own body part moving toward the stimulus, thus using an egocentric strategy. Several studies have also shown that the mental rotation of hands is affected by the actual hand position, especially if the hand is kept in an awkward position. However, this hand posture effect, as well as the use of an egocentric strategy during mental rotation of body parts, is not systematic. Several experiments have demonstrated that manipulating the stimulus features or the paradigm could induce a shift to visual and allocentric strategies. Here, we studied the effects of hand posture and biomechanical constraints on one-hand mental rotation (laterality judgment task), two-hand mental rotation (same–different judgment task), and mental rotation of one or two alphanumeric symbols (control tasks). Effects of posture and biomechanical constraints were observed solely for the laterality judgment task. Response times in the same–different hand mental rotation items were influenced by the angular disparity between the stimuli. We interpreted our result as evidence of the use of different strategies for each task. Future research should focus on disentangling the exact subprocesses in which an egocentric strategy is used, in order to propose better tests for participants with motor impairments.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Mental rotation</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Motor imagery</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Hand laterality</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Egocentric/allocentric strategies</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Di Rienzo, Franck</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Collet, Christian</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Creveaux, Thomas</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Guillot, Aymeric</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Perception & psychophysics</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY : Springer, 1966</subfield><subfield code="g">76(2013), 2 vom: 30. Okt., Seite 519-526</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)32818795X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2045204-4</subfield><subfield code="x">1532-5962</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:76</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2013</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:30</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:519-526</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0577-z</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">76</subfield><subfield code="j">2013</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">30</subfield><subfield code="c">10</subfield><subfield code="h">519-526</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Hoyek, Nady
spellingShingle	Hoyek, Nady misc Mental rotation misc Motor imagery misc Hand laterality misc Egocentric/allocentric strategies Hand mental rotation is not systematically altered by actual body position: Laterality judgment versus same–different comparison tasks
authorStr	Hoyek, Nady
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)32818795X
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut
collection	springer
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	1532-5962
topic_title	Hand mental rotation is not systematically altered by actual body position: Laterality judgment versus same–different comparison tasks Mental rotation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Motor imagery (dpeaa)DE-He213 Hand laterality (dpeaa)DE-He213 Egocentric/allocentric strategies (dpeaa)DE-He213
topic	misc Mental rotation misc Motor imagery misc Hand laterality misc Egocentric/allocentric strategies
topic_unstemmed	misc Mental rotation misc Motor imagery misc Hand laterality misc Egocentric/allocentric strategies
topic_browse	misc Mental rotation misc Motor imagery misc Hand laterality misc Egocentric/allocentric strategies
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Perception & psychophysics
hierarchy_parent_id	32818795X
hierarchy_top_title	Perception & psychophysics
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)32818795X (DE-600)2045204-4
title	Hand mental rotation is not systematically altered by actual body position: Laterality judgment versus same–different comparison tasks
ctrlnum	(DE-627)SPR031626750 (SPR)s13414-013-0577-z-e
title_full	Hand mental rotation is not systematically altered by actual body position: Laterality judgment versus same–different comparison tasks
author_sort	Hoyek, Nady
journal	Perception & psychophysics
journalStr	Perception & psychophysics
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2013
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	519
author_browse	Hoyek, Nady Di Rienzo, Franck Collet, Christian Creveaux, Thomas Guillot, Aymeric
container_volume	76
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Hoyek, Nady
doi_str_mv	10.3758/s13414-013-0577-z
title_sort	hand mental rotation is not systematically altered by actual body position: laterality judgment versus same–different comparison tasks
title_auth	Hand mental rotation is not systematically altered by actual body position: Laterality judgment versus same–different comparison tasks
abstract	Abstract It is commonly believed that during mental rotation of body parts, participants tend to imagine their own body part moving toward the stimulus, thus using an egocentric strategy. Several studies have also shown that the mental rotation of hands is affected by the actual hand position, especially if the hand is kept in an awkward position. However, this hand posture effect, as well as the use of an egocentric strategy during mental rotation of body parts, is not systematic. Several experiments have demonstrated that manipulating the stimulus features or the paradigm could induce a shift to visual and allocentric strategies. Here, we studied the effects of hand posture and biomechanical constraints on one-hand mental rotation (laterality judgment task), two-hand mental rotation (same–different judgment task), and mental rotation of one or two alphanumeric symbols (control tasks). Effects of posture and biomechanical constraints were observed solely for the laterality judgment task. Response times in the same–different hand mental rotation items were influenced by the angular disparity between the stimuli. We interpreted our result as evidence of the use of different strategies for each task. Future research should focus on disentangling the exact subprocesses in which an egocentric strategy is used, in order to propose better tests for participants with motor impairments. © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2013
abstractGer	Abstract It is commonly believed that during mental rotation of body parts, participants tend to imagine their own body part moving toward the stimulus, thus using an egocentric strategy. Several studies have also shown that the mental rotation of hands is affected by the actual hand position, especially if the hand is kept in an awkward position. However, this hand posture effect, as well as the use of an egocentric strategy during mental rotation of body parts, is not systematic. Several experiments have demonstrated that manipulating the stimulus features or the paradigm could induce a shift to visual and allocentric strategies. Here, we studied the effects of hand posture and biomechanical constraints on one-hand mental rotation (laterality judgment task), two-hand mental rotation (same–different judgment task), and mental rotation of one or two alphanumeric symbols (control tasks). Effects of posture and biomechanical constraints were observed solely for the laterality judgment task. Response times in the same–different hand mental rotation items were influenced by the angular disparity between the stimuli. We interpreted our result as evidence of the use of different strategies for each task. Future research should focus on disentangling the exact subprocesses in which an egocentric strategy is used, in order to propose better tests for participants with motor impairments. © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2013
abstract_unstemmed	Abstract It is commonly believed that during mental rotation of body parts, participants tend to imagine their own body part moving toward the stimulus, thus using an egocentric strategy. Several studies have also shown that the mental rotation of hands is affected by the actual hand position, especially if the hand is kept in an awkward position. However, this hand posture effect, as well as the use of an egocentric strategy during mental rotation of body parts, is not systematic. Several experiments have demonstrated that manipulating the stimulus features or the paradigm could induce a shift to visual and allocentric strategies. Here, we studied the effects of hand posture and biomechanical constraints on one-hand mental rotation (laterality judgment task), two-hand mental rotation (same–different judgment task), and mental rotation of one or two alphanumeric symbols (control tasks). Effects of posture and biomechanical constraints were observed solely for the laterality judgment task. Response times in the same–different hand mental rotation items were influenced by the angular disparity between the stimuli. We interpreted our result as evidence of the use of different strategies for each task. Future research should focus on disentangling the exact subprocesses in which an egocentric strategy is used, in order to propose better tests for participants with motor impairments. © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2013
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2020
container_issue	2
title_short	Hand mental rotation is not systematically altered by actual body position: Laterality judgment versus same–different comparison tasks
url	https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0577-z
remote_bool	true
author2	Di Rienzo, Franck Collet, Christian Creveaux, Thomas Guillot, Aymeric
author2Str	Di Rienzo, Franck Collet, Christian Creveaux, Thomas Guillot, Aymeric
ppnlink	32818795X
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.3758/s13414-013-0577-z
up_date	2024-07-04T00:35:10.443Z
_version_	1803606620053176320
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR031626750</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230507184311.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2013 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3758/s13414-013-0577-z</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR031626750</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s13414-013-0577-z-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hoyek, Nady</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Hand mental rotation is not systematically altered by actual body position: Laterality judgment versus same–different comparison tasks</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract It is commonly believed that during mental rotation of body parts, participants tend to imagine their own body part moving toward the stimulus, thus using an egocentric strategy. Several studies have also shown that the mental rotation of hands is affected by the actual hand position, especially if the hand is kept in an awkward position. However, this hand posture effect, as well as the use of an egocentric strategy during mental rotation of body parts, is not systematic. Several experiments have demonstrated that manipulating the stimulus features or the paradigm could induce a shift to visual and allocentric strategies. Here, we studied the effects of hand posture and biomechanical constraints on one-hand mental rotation (laterality judgment task), two-hand mental rotation (same–different judgment task), and mental rotation of one or two alphanumeric symbols (control tasks). Effects of posture and biomechanical constraints were observed solely for the laterality judgment task. Response times in the same–different hand mental rotation items were influenced by the angular disparity between the stimuli. We interpreted our result as evidence of the use of different strategies for each task. Future research should focus on disentangling the exact subprocesses in which an egocentric strategy is used, in order to propose better tests for participants with motor impairments.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Mental rotation</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Motor imagery</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Hand laterality</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Egocentric/allocentric strategies</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Di Rienzo, Franck</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Collet, Christian</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Creveaux, Thomas</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Guillot, Aymeric</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Perception & psychophysics</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY : Springer, 1966</subfield><subfield code="g">76(2013), 2 vom: 30. Okt., Seite 519-526</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)32818795X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2045204-4</subfield><subfield code="x">1532-5962</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:76</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2013</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:30</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:519-526</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0577-z</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">76</subfield><subfield code="j">2013</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">30</subfield><subfield code="c">10</subfield><subfield code="h">519-526</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.401886

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Hand mental rotation is not systematically altered by actual body position: Laterality judgment versus same–different comparison tasks

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?