Alternatives to polysomnography (PSG): A validation of wrist actigraphy and a partial-PSG system
Abstract The objective of this study was to assess the validity of a sleep/wake activity monitor, an energy expenditure activity monitor, and a partial-polysomnography system at measuring sleep and wake under identical conditions. Secondary aims were to evaluate the sleep/wake thresholds for each ac...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Kosmadopoulos, Anastasi [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2014 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Anmerkung: |
© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2014 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Behavior research methods, instruments & computers - Austin, Tex. : Psychonomic Society Publ., 1984, 46(2014), 4 vom: 18. Jan., Seite 1032-1041 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:46 ; year:2014 ; number:4 ; day:18 ; month:01 ; pages:1032-1041 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.3758/s13428-013-0438-7 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
SPR031702406 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | SPR031702406 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230507184339.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 201007s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3758/s13428-013-0438-7 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)SPR031702406 | ||
035 | |a (SPR)s13428-013-0438-7-e | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Kosmadopoulos, Anastasi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Alternatives to polysomnography (PSG): A validation of wrist actigraphy and a partial-PSG system |
264 | 1 | |c 2014 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2014 | ||
520 | |a Abstract The objective of this study was to assess the validity of a sleep/wake activity monitor, an energy expenditure activity monitor, and a partial-polysomnography system at measuring sleep and wake under identical conditions. Secondary aims were to evaluate the sleep/wake thresholds for each activity monitor and to compare the three devices. To achieve these aims, two nights of sleep were recorded simultaneously with polysomnography (PSG), two activity monitors, and a partial-PSG system in a sleep laboratory. Agreement with PSG was evaluated epoch by epoch and with summary measures including total sleep time (TST) and wake after sleep onset (WASO). All of the devices had high agreement rates for identifying sleep and wake, but the partial-PSG system was the best, with an agreement of 91.6 % ± 5.1 %. At their best thresholds, the sleep/wake monitor (medium threshold, 87.7 % ± 7.6 %) and the energy expenditure monitor (very low threshold, 86.8 % ± 8.6 %) had similarly high rates of agreement. The summary measures were similar to those determined by PSG, but the partial-PSG system provided the most consistent estimates. Although the partial-PSG system was the most accurate device, both activity monitors were also valid for sleep estimation, provided that appropriate thresholds were selected. Each device has advantages, so the primary consideration for researchers will be to determine which best suits a given research design. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Actigraphy |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Accelerometry |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Wireless sleep monitoring |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
700 | 1 | |a Sargent, Charli |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Darwent, David |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Zhou, Xuan |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Roach, Gregory D. |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Behavior research methods, instruments & computers |d Austin, Tex. : Psychonomic Society Publ., 1984 |g 46(2014), 4 vom: 18. Jan., Seite 1032-1041 |w (DE-627)32998067X |w (DE-600)2048669-8 |x 1532-5970 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:46 |g year:2014 |g number:4 |g day:18 |g month:01 |g pages:1032-1041 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0438-7 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_101 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_120 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_138 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_152 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_171 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_187 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_250 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_281 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 46 |j 2014 |e 4 |b 18 |c 01 |h 1032-1041 |
author_variant |
a k ak c s cs d d dd x z xz g d r gd gdr |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:15325970:2014----::lentvsooyongahpgvldtoowitcirpy |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2014 |
publishDate |
2014 |
allfields |
10.3758/s13428-013-0438-7 doi (DE-627)SPR031702406 (SPR)s13428-013-0438-7-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kosmadopoulos, Anastasi verfasserin aut Alternatives to polysomnography (PSG): A validation of wrist actigraphy and a partial-PSG system 2014 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2014 Abstract The objective of this study was to assess the validity of a sleep/wake activity monitor, an energy expenditure activity monitor, and a partial-polysomnography system at measuring sleep and wake under identical conditions. Secondary aims were to evaluate the sleep/wake thresholds for each activity monitor and to compare the three devices. To achieve these aims, two nights of sleep were recorded simultaneously with polysomnography (PSG), two activity monitors, and a partial-PSG system in a sleep laboratory. Agreement with PSG was evaluated epoch by epoch and with summary measures including total sleep time (TST) and wake after sleep onset (WASO). All of the devices had high agreement rates for identifying sleep and wake, but the partial-PSG system was the best, with an agreement of 91.6 % ± 5.1 %. At their best thresholds, the sleep/wake monitor (medium threshold, 87.7 % ± 7.6 %) and the energy expenditure monitor (very low threshold, 86.8 % ± 8.6 %) had similarly high rates of agreement. The summary measures were similar to those determined by PSG, but the partial-PSG system provided the most consistent estimates. Although the partial-PSG system was the most accurate device, both activity monitors were also valid for sleep estimation, provided that appropriate thresholds were selected. Each device has advantages, so the primary consideration for researchers will be to determine which best suits a given research design. Actigraphy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Accelerometry (dpeaa)DE-He213 Wireless sleep monitoring (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sargent, Charli aut Darwent, David aut Zhou, Xuan aut Roach, Gregory D. aut Enthalten in Behavior research methods, instruments & computers Austin, Tex. : Psychonomic Society Publ., 1984 46(2014), 4 vom: 18. Jan., Seite 1032-1041 (DE-627)32998067X (DE-600)2048669-8 1532-5970 nnns volume:46 year:2014 number:4 day:18 month:01 pages:1032-1041 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0438-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2014 AR 46 2014 4 18 01 1032-1041 |
spelling |
10.3758/s13428-013-0438-7 doi (DE-627)SPR031702406 (SPR)s13428-013-0438-7-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kosmadopoulos, Anastasi verfasserin aut Alternatives to polysomnography (PSG): A validation of wrist actigraphy and a partial-PSG system 2014 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2014 Abstract The objective of this study was to assess the validity of a sleep/wake activity monitor, an energy expenditure activity monitor, and a partial-polysomnography system at measuring sleep and wake under identical conditions. Secondary aims were to evaluate the sleep/wake thresholds for each activity monitor and to compare the three devices. To achieve these aims, two nights of sleep were recorded simultaneously with polysomnography (PSG), two activity monitors, and a partial-PSG system in a sleep laboratory. Agreement with PSG was evaluated epoch by epoch and with summary measures including total sleep time (TST) and wake after sleep onset (WASO). All of the devices had high agreement rates for identifying sleep and wake, but the partial-PSG system was the best, with an agreement of 91.6 % ± 5.1 %. At their best thresholds, the sleep/wake monitor (medium threshold, 87.7 % ± 7.6 %) and the energy expenditure monitor (very low threshold, 86.8 % ± 8.6 %) had similarly high rates of agreement. The summary measures were similar to those determined by PSG, but the partial-PSG system provided the most consistent estimates. Although the partial-PSG system was the most accurate device, both activity monitors were also valid for sleep estimation, provided that appropriate thresholds were selected. Each device has advantages, so the primary consideration for researchers will be to determine which best suits a given research design. Actigraphy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Accelerometry (dpeaa)DE-He213 Wireless sleep monitoring (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sargent, Charli aut Darwent, David aut Zhou, Xuan aut Roach, Gregory D. aut Enthalten in Behavior research methods, instruments & computers Austin, Tex. : Psychonomic Society Publ., 1984 46(2014), 4 vom: 18. Jan., Seite 1032-1041 (DE-627)32998067X (DE-600)2048669-8 1532-5970 nnns volume:46 year:2014 number:4 day:18 month:01 pages:1032-1041 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0438-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2014 AR 46 2014 4 18 01 1032-1041 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.3758/s13428-013-0438-7 doi (DE-627)SPR031702406 (SPR)s13428-013-0438-7-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kosmadopoulos, Anastasi verfasserin aut Alternatives to polysomnography (PSG): A validation of wrist actigraphy and a partial-PSG system 2014 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2014 Abstract The objective of this study was to assess the validity of a sleep/wake activity monitor, an energy expenditure activity monitor, and a partial-polysomnography system at measuring sleep and wake under identical conditions. Secondary aims were to evaluate the sleep/wake thresholds for each activity monitor and to compare the three devices. To achieve these aims, two nights of sleep were recorded simultaneously with polysomnography (PSG), two activity monitors, and a partial-PSG system in a sleep laboratory. Agreement with PSG was evaluated epoch by epoch and with summary measures including total sleep time (TST) and wake after sleep onset (WASO). All of the devices had high agreement rates for identifying sleep and wake, but the partial-PSG system was the best, with an agreement of 91.6 % ± 5.1 %. At their best thresholds, the sleep/wake monitor (medium threshold, 87.7 % ± 7.6 %) and the energy expenditure monitor (very low threshold, 86.8 % ± 8.6 %) had similarly high rates of agreement. The summary measures were similar to those determined by PSG, but the partial-PSG system provided the most consistent estimates. Although the partial-PSG system was the most accurate device, both activity monitors were also valid for sleep estimation, provided that appropriate thresholds were selected. Each device has advantages, so the primary consideration for researchers will be to determine which best suits a given research design. Actigraphy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Accelerometry (dpeaa)DE-He213 Wireless sleep monitoring (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sargent, Charli aut Darwent, David aut Zhou, Xuan aut Roach, Gregory D. aut Enthalten in Behavior research methods, instruments & computers Austin, Tex. : Psychonomic Society Publ., 1984 46(2014), 4 vom: 18. Jan., Seite 1032-1041 (DE-627)32998067X (DE-600)2048669-8 1532-5970 nnns volume:46 year:2014 number:4 day:18 month:01 pages:1032-1041 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0438-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2014 AR 46 2014 4 18 01 1032-1041 |
allfieldsGer |
10.3758/s13428-013-0438-7 doi (DE-627)SPR031702406 (SPR)s13428-013-0438-7-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kosmadopoulos, Anastasi verfasserin aut Alternatives to polysomnography (PSG): A validation of wrist actigraphy and a partial-PSG system 2014 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2014 Abstract The objective of this study was to assess the validity of a sleep/wake activity monitor, an energy expenditure activity monitor, and a partial-polysomnography system at measuring sleep and wake under identical conditions. Secondary aims were to evaluate the sleep/wake thresholds for each activity monitor and to compare the three devices. To achieve these aims, two nights of sleep were recorded simultaneously with polysomnography (PSG), two activity monitors, and a partial-PSG system in a sleep laboratory. Agreement with PSG was evaluated epoch by epoch and with summary measures including total sleep time (TST) and wake after sleep onset (WASO). All of the devices had high agreement rates for identifying sleep and wake, but the partial-PSG system was the best, with an agreement of 91.6 % ± 5.1 %. At their best thresholds, the sleep/wake monitor (medium threshold, 87.7 % ± 7.6 %) and the energy expenditure monitor (very low threshold, 86.8 % ± 8.6 %) had similarly high rates of agreement. The summary measures were similar to those determined by PSG, but the partial-PSG system provided the most consistent estimates. Although the partial-PSG system was the most accurate device, both activity monitors were also valid for sleep estimation, provided that appropriate thresholds were selected. Each device has advantages, so the primary consideration for researchers will be to determine which best suits a given research design. Actigraphy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Accelerometry (dpeaa)DE-He213 Wireless sleep monitoring (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sargent, Charli aut Darwent, David aut Zhou, Xuan aut Roach, Gregory D. aut Enthalten in Behavior research methods, instruments & computers Austin, Tex. : Psychonomic Society Publ., 1984 46(2014), 4 vom: 18. Jan., Seite 1032-1041 (DE-627)32998067X (DE-600)2048669-8 1532-5970 nnns volume:46 year:2014 number:4 day:18 month:01 pages:1032-1041 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0438-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2014 AR 46 2014 4 18 01 1032-1041 |
allfieldsSound |
10.3758/s13428-013-0438-7 doi (DE-627)SPR031702406 (SPR)s13428-013-0438-7-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kosmadopoulos, Anastasi verfasserin aut Alternatives to polysomnography (PSG): A validation of wrist actigraphy and a partial-PSG system 2014 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2014 Abstract The objective of this study was to assess the validity of a sleep/wake activity monitor, an energy expenditure activity monitor, and a partial-polysomnography system at measuring sleep and wake under identical conditions. Secondary aims were to evaluate the sleep/wake thresholds for each activity monitor and to compare the three devices. To achieve these aims, two nights of sleep were recorded simultaneously with polysomnography (PSG), two activity monitors, and a partial-PSG system in a sleep laboratory. Agreement with PSG was evaluated epoch by epoch and with summary measures including total sleep time (TST) and wake after sleep onset (WASO). All of the devices had high agreement rates for identifying sleep and wake, but the partial-PSG system was the best, with an agreement of 91.6 % ± 5.1 %. At their best thresholds, the sleep/wake monitor (medium threshold, 87.7 % ± 7.6 %) and the energy expenditure monitor (very low threshold, 86.8 % ± 8.6 %) had similarly high rates of agreement. The summary measures were similar to those determined by PSG, but the partial-PSG system provided the most consistent estimates. Although the partial-PSG system was the most accurate device, both activity monitors were also valid for sleep estimation, provided that appropriate thresholds were selected. Each device has advantages, so the primary consideration for researchers will be to determine which best suits a given research design. Actigraphy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Accelerometry (dpeaa)DE-He213 Wireless sleep monitoring (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sargent, Charli aut Darwent, David aut Zhou, Xuan aut Roach, Gregory D. aut Enthalten in Behavior research methods, instruments & computers Austin, Tex. : Psychonomic Society Publ., 1984 46(2014), 4 vom: 18. Jan., Seite 1032-1041 (DE-627)32998067X (DE-600)2048669-8 1532-5970 nnns volume:46 year:2014 number:4 day:18 month:01 pages:1032-1041 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0438-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2014 AR 46 2014 4 18 01 1032-1041 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Behavior research methods, instruments & computers 46(2014), 4 vom: 18. Jan., Seite 1032-1041 volume:46 year:2014 number:4 day:18 month:01 pages:1032-1041 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Behavior research methods, instruments & computers 46(2014), 4 vom: 18. Jan., Seite 1032-1041 volume:46 year:2014 number:4 day:18 month:01 pages:1032-1041 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Actigraphy Accelerometry Wireless sleep monitoring |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Behavior research methods, instruments & computers |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Kosmadopoulos, Anastasi @@aut@@ Sargent, Charli @@aut@@ Darwent, David @@aut@@ Zhou, Xuan @@aut@@ Roach, Gregory D. @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2014-01-18T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
32998067X |
id |
SPR031702406 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR031702406</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230507184339.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3758/s13428-013-0438-7</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR031702406</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s13428-013-0438-7-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kosmadopoulos, Anastasi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Alternatives to polysomnography (PSG): A validation of wrist actigraphy and a partial-PSG system</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The objective of this study was to assess the validity of a sleep/wake activity monitor, an energy expenditure activity monitor, and a partial-polysomnography system at measuring sleep and wake under identical conditions. Secondary aims were to evaluate the sleep/wake thresholds for each activity monitor and to compare the three devices. To achieve these aims, two nights of sleep were recorded simultaneously with polysomnography (PSG), two activity monitors, and a partial-PSG system in a sleep laboratory. Agreement with PSG was evaluated epoch by epoch and with summary measures including total sleep time (TST) and wake after sleep onset (WASO). All of the devices had high agreement rates for identifying sleep and wake, but the partial-PSG system was the best, with an agreement of 91.6 % ± 5.1 %. At their best thresholds, the sleep/wake monitor (medium threshold, 87.7 % ± 7.6 %) and the energy expenditure monitor (very low threshold, 86.8 % ± 8.6 %) had similarly high rates of agreement. The summary measures were similar to those determined by PSG, but the partial-PSG system provided the most consistent estimates. Although the partial-PSG system was the most accurate device, both activity monitors were also valid for sleep estimation, provided that appropriate thresholds were selected. Each device has advantages, so the primary consideration for researchers will be to determine which best suits a given research design.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Actigraphy</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Accelerometry</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Wireless sleep monitoring</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sargent, Charli</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Darwent, David</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhou, Xuan</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Roach, Gregory D.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Behavior research methods, instruments & computers</subfield><subfield code="d">Austin, Tex. : Psychonomic Society Publ., 1984</subfield><subfield code="g">46(2014), 4 vom: 18. Jan., Seite 1032-1041</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)32998067X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2048669-8</subfield><subfield code="x">1532-5970</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:46</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">day:18</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1032-1041</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0438-7</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">46</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="b">18</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield><subfield code="h">1032-1041</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Kosmadopoulos, Anastasi |
spellingShingle |
Kosmadopoulos, Anastasi misc Actigraphy misc Accelerometry misc Wireless sleep monitoring Alternatives to polysomnography (PSG): A validation of wrist actigraphy and a partial-PSG system |
authorStr |
Kosmadopoulos, Anastasi |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)32998067X |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
springer |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1532-5970 |
topic_title |
Alternatives to polysomnography (PSG): A validation of wrist actigraphy and a partial-PSG system Actigraphy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Accelerometry (dpeaa)DE-He213 Wireless sleep monitoring (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
topic |
misc Actigraphy misc Accelerometry misc Wireless sleep monitoring |
topic_unstemmed |
misc Actigraphy misc Accelerometry misc Wireless sleep monitoring |
topic_browse |
misc Actigraphy misc Accelerometry misc Wireless sleep monitoring |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Behavior research methods, instruments & computers |
hierarchy_parent_id |
32998067X |
hierarchy_top_title |
Behavior research methods, instruments & computers |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)32998067X (DE-600)2048669-8 |
title |
Alternatives to polysomnography (PSG): A validation of wrist actigraphy and a partial-PSG system |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR031702406 (SPR)s13428-013-0438-7-e |
title_full |
Alternatives to polysomnography (PSG): A validation of wrist actigraphy and a partial-PSG system |
author_sort |
Kosmadopoulos, Anastasi |
journal |
Behavior research methods, instruments & computers |
journalStr |
Behavior research methods, instruments & computers |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2014 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
1032 |
author_browse |
Kosmadopoulos, Anastasi Sargent, Charli Darwent, David Zhou, Xuan Roach, Gregory D. |
container_volume |
46 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Kosmadopoulos, Anastasi |
doi_str_mv |
10.3758/s13428-013-0438-7 |
title_sort |
alternatives to polysomnography (psg): a validation of wrist actigraphy and a partial-psg system |
title_auth |
Alternatives to polysomnography (PSG): A validation of wrist actigraphy and a partial-PSG system |
abstract |
Abstract The objective of this study was to assess the validity of a sleep/wake activity monitor, an energy expenditure activity monitor, and a partial-polysomnography system at measuring sleep and wake under identical conditions. Secondary aims were to evaluate the sleep/wake thresholds for each activity monitor and to compare the three devices. To achieve these aims, two nights of sleep were recorded simultaneously with polysomnography (PSG), two activity monitors, and a partial-PSG system in a sleep laboratory. Agreement with PSG was evaluated epoch by epoch and with summary measures including total sleep time (TST) and wake after sleep onset (WASO). All of the devices had high agreement rates for identifying sleep and wake, but the partial-PSG system was the best, with an agreement of 91.6 % ± 5.1 %. At their best thresholds, the sleep/wake monitor (medium threshold, 87.7 % ± 7.6 %) and the energy expenditure monitor (very low threshold, 86.8 % ± 8.6 %) had similarly high rates of agreement. The summary measures were similar to those determined by PSG, but the partial-PSG system provided the most consistent estimates. Although the partial-PSG system was the most accurate device, both activity monitors were also valid for sleep estimation, provided that appropriate thresholds were selected. Each device has advantages, so the primary consideration for researchers will be to determine which best suits a given research design. © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2014 |
abstractGer |
Abstract The objective of this study was to assess the validity of a sleep/wake activity monitor, an energy expenditure activity monitor, and a partial-polysomnography system at measuring sleep and wake under identical conditions. Secondary aims were to evaluate the sleep/wake thresholds for each activity monitor and to compare the three devices. To achieve these aims, two nights of sleep were recorded simultaneously with polysomnography (PSG), two activity monitors, and a partial-PSG system in a sleep laboratory. Agreement with PSG was evaluated epoch by epoch and with summary measures including total sleep time (TST) and wake after sleep onset (WASO). All of the devices had high agreement rates for identifying sleep and wake, but the partial-PSG system was the best, with an agreement of 91.6 % ± 5.1 %. At their best thresholds, the sleep/wake monitor (medium threshold, 87.7 % ± 7.6 %) and the energy expenditure monitor (very low threshold, 86.8 % ± 8.6 %) had similarly high rates of agreement. The summary measures were similar to those determined by PSG, but the partial-PSG system provided the most consistent estimates. Although the partial-PSG system was the most accurate device, both activity monitors were also valid for sleep estimation, provided that appropriate thresholds were selected. Each device has advantages, so the primary consideration for researchers will be to determine which best suits a given research design. © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2014 |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract The objective of this study was to assess the validity of a sleep/wake activity monitor, an energy expenditure activity monitor, and a partial-polysomnography system at measuring sleep and wake under identical conditions. Secondary aims were to evaluate the sleep/wake thresholds for each activity monitor and to compare the three devices. To achieve these aims, two nights of sleep were recorded simultaneously with polysomnography (PSG), two activity monitors, and a partial-PSG system in a sleep laboratory. Agreement with PSG was evaluated epoch by epoch and with summary measures including total sleep time (TST) and wake after sleep onset (WASO). All of the devices had high agreement rates for identifying sleep and wake, but the partial-PSG system was the best, with an agreement of 91.6 % ± 5.1 %. At their best thresholds, the sleep/wake monitor (medium threshold, 87.7 % ± 7.6 %) and the energy expenditure monitor (very low threshold, 86.8 % ± 8.6 %) had similarly high rates of agreement. The summary measures were similar to those determined by PSG, but the partial-PSG system provided the most consistent estimates. Although the partial-PSG system was the most accurate device, both activity monitors were also valid for sleep estimation, provided that appropriate thresholds were selected. Each device has advantages, so the primary consideration for researchers will be to determine which best suits a given research design. © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2014 |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2014 |
container_issue |
4 |
title_short |
Alternatives to polysomnography (PSG): A validation of wrist actigraphy and a partial-PSG system |
url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0438-7 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Sargent, Charli Darwent, David Zhou, Xuan Roach, Gregory D. |
author2Str |
Sargent, Charli Darwent, David Zhou, Xuan Roach, Gregory D. |
ppnlink |
32998067X |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.3758/s13428-013-0438-7 |
up_date |
2024-07-04T00:54:34.950Z |
_version_ |
1803607841126219776 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR031702406</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230507184339.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3758/s13428-013-0438-7</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR031702406</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s13428-013-0438-7-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kosmadopoulos, Anastasi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Alternatives to polysomnography (PSG): A validation of wrist actigraphy and a partial-PSG system</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The objective of this study was to assess the validity of a sleep/wake activity monitor, an energy expenditure activity monitor, and a partial-polysomnography system at measuring sleep and wake under identical conditions. Secondary aims were to evaluate the sleep/wake thresholds for each activity monitor and to compare the three devices. To achieve these aims, two nights of sleep were recorded simultaneously with polysomnography (PSG), two activity monitors, and a partial-PSG system in a sleep laboratory. Agreement with PSG was evaluated epoch by epoch and with summary measures including total sleep time (TST) and wake after sleep onset (WASO). All of the devices had high agreement rates for identifying sleep and wake, but the partial-PSG system was the best, with an agreement of 91.6 % ± 5.1 %. At their best thresholds, the sleep/wake monitor (medium threshold, 87.7 % ± 7.6 %) and the energy expenditure monitor (very low threshold, 86.8 % ± 8.6 %) had similarly high rates of agreement. The summary measures were similar to those determined by PSG, but the partial-PSG system provided the most consistent estimates. Although the partial-PSG system was the most accurate device, both activity monitors were also valid for sleep estimation, provided that appropriate thresholds were selected. Each device has advantages, so the primary consideration for researchers will be to determine which best suits a given research design.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Actigraphy</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Accelerometry</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Wireless sleep monitoring</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sargent, Charli</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Darwent, David</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhou, Xuan</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Roach, Gregory D.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Behavior research methods, instruments & computers</subfield><subfield code="d">Austin, Tex. : Psychonomic Society Publ., 1984</subfield><subfield code="g">46(2014), 4 vom: 18. Jan., Seite 1032-1041</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)32998067X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2048669-8</subfield><subfield code="x">1532-5970</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:46</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">day:18</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1032-1041</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0438-7</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">46</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="b">18</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield><subfield code="h">1032-1041</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4007616 |