Impact of abdominal drainage systems on postoperative complication rates following liver transplantation

Background Depending on the extent of surgery, coagulation status and the number of anastomoses, drains are routinely used during liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to compare different drain types with regard to abdominal complication rates. Methods All consecutive full-size orthotopi...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Weiss, Sascha [verfasserIn] Messner, Franka [verfasserIn] Huth, Marcus [verfasserIn] Weissenbacher, Annemarie [verfasserIn] Denecke, Christian [verfasserIn] Aigner, Felix [verfasserIn] Brandl, Andreas [verfasserIn] Dziodzio, Tomasz [verfasserIn] Sucher, Robert [verfasserIn] Boesmueller, Claudia [verfasserIn] Oellinger, Robert [verfasserIn] Schneeberger, Stefan [verfasserIn] Oefner, Dietmar [verfasserIn] Pratschke, Johann [verfasserIn] Biebl, Matthias [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2015

Schlagwörter:	Liver transplantation Drainage systems Postoperative complications Open-circuit drainage Closed-circuit drainage

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: European journal of medical research - London : BioMed Central, 2000, 20(2015), 1 vom: 21. Aug.
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:20 ; year:2015 ; number:1 ; day:21 ; month:08

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.1186/s40001-015-0163-z

Katalog-ID:	SPR032596286

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	SPR032596286
003	DE-627
005	20230519194441.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	201007s2015 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1186/s40001-015-0163-z \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)SPR032596286
035			\|a (SPR)s40001-015-0163-z-e
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 610 \|q ASE
100	1		\|a Weiss, Sascha \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Impact of abdominal drainage systems on postoperative complication rates following liver transplantation
264		1	\|c 2015
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Background Depending on the extent of surgery, coagulation status and the number of anastomoses, drains are routinely used during liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to compare different drain types with regard to abdominal complication rates. Methods All consecutive full-size orthotopic liver transplantations (LTX) performed over a 7-year period were included in this retrospective analysis. Abdominal drain groups were divided into open-circuit drains and closed-circuit drains. Data are reported as total number (%) or median (range); for all comparisons a p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 256 LTX [age 56.89 (0.30–75.21) years; MELD 14.5 (7–40)] was included; 56 (21.8 %) patients received an open-circuit Easy Flow Drain (Group 1) and 200 (78.2 %) a closed-circuit Robinson Drainage System (Group 2). For Groups 1 and 2, overall infection rates were 78.6 and 56 % (p = 0.001), abdominal infection rates 50.82 and 21.92 % (p = 0.001), yeast infection rates 37 and 23 % (p = 0.02), abdominal bleeding rates 26.78 and 17 % (p = 0.07), biliary complication rates 14.28 and 13.5 % (p = 0.51), respectively. Conclusions In this retrospective series, open-circuit drains were associated with more abdominal complications, mainly due to intraabdominal infections, than were closed-circuit drains.
650		4	\|a Liver transplantation \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Drainage systems \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Postoperative complications \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Open-circuit drainage \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Closed-circuit drainage \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
700	1		\|a Messner, Franka \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Huth, Marcus \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Weissenbacher, Annemarie \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Denecke, Christian \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Aigner, Felix \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Brandl, Andreas \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Dziodzio, Tomasz \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Sucher, Robert \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Boesmueller, Claudia \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Oellinger, Robert \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Schneeberger, Stefan \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Oefner, Dietmar \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Pratschke, Johann \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Biebl, Matthias \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t European journal of medical research \|d London : BioMed Central, 2000 \|g 20(2015), 1 vom: 21. Aug. \|w (DE-627)375977775 \|w (DE-600)2129989-4 \|x 2047-783X \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:20 \|g year:2015 \|g number:1 \|g day:21 \|g month:08
856	4	0	\|u https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-015-0163-z \|z kostenfrei \|3 Volltext
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_SPRINGER
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHA
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 20 \|j 2015 \|e 1 \|b 21 \|c 08

Indexfelder

author_variant	s w sw f m fm m h mh a w aw c d cd f a fa a b ab t d td r s rs c b cb r o ro s s ss d o do j p jp m b mb
matchkey_str	article:2047783X:2015----::matfboiadangssesnotprtvcmlctortsol
hierarchy_sort_str	2015
publishDate	2015
allfields	10.1186/s40001-015-0163-z doi (DE-627)SPR032596286 (SPR)s40001-015-0163-z-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 ASE Weiss, Sascha verfasserin aut Impact of abdominal drainage systems on postoperative complication rates following liver transplantation 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background Depending on the extent of surgery, coagulation status and the number of anastomoses, drains are routinely used during liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to compare different drain types with regard to abdominal complication rates. Methods All consecutive full-size orthotopic liver transplantations (LTX) performed over a 7-year period were included in this retrospective analysis. Abdominal drain groups were divided into open-circuit drains and closed-circuit drains. Data are reported as total number (%) or median (range); for all comparisons a p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 256 LTX [age 56.89 (0.30–75.21) years; MELD 14.5 (7–40)] was included; 56 (21.8 %) patients received an open-circuit Easy Flow Drain (Group 1) and 200 (78.2 %) a closed-circuit Robinson Drainage System (Group 2). For Groups 1 and 2, overall infection rates were 78.6 and 56 % (p = 0.001), abdominal infection rates 50.82 and 21.92 % (p = 0.001), yeast infection rates 37 and 23 % (p = 0.02), abdominal bleeding rates 26.78 and 17 % (p = 0.07), biliary complication rates 14.28 and 13.5 % (p = 0.51), respectively. Conclusions In this retrospective series, open-circuit drains were associated with more abdominal complications, mainly due to intraabdominal infections, than were closed-circuit drains. Liver transplantation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Drainage systems (dpeaa)DE-He213 Postoperative complications (dpeaa)DE-He213 Open-circuit drainage (dpeaa)DE-He213 Closed-circuit drainage (dpeaa)DE-He213 Messner, Franka verfasserin aut Huth, Marcus verfasserin aut Weissenbacher, Annemarie verfasserin aut Denecke, Christian verfasserin aut Aigner, Felix verfasserin aut Brandl, Andreas verfasserin aut Dziodzio, Tomasz verfasserin aut Sucher, Robert verfasserin aut Boesmueller, Claudia verfasserin aut Oellinger, Robert verfasserin aut Schneeberger, Stefan verfasserin aut Oefner, Dietmar verfasserin aut Pratschke, Johann verfasserin aut Biebl, Matthias verfasserin aut Enthalten in European journal of medical research London : BioMed Central, 2000 20(2015), 1 vom: 21. Aug. (DE-627)375977775 (DE-600)2129989-4 2047-783X nnns volume:20 year:2015 number:1 day:21 month:08 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-015-0163-z kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 20 2015 1 21 08
spelling	10.1186/s40001-015-0163-z doi (DE-627)SPR032596286 (SPR)s40001-015-0163-z-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 ASE Weiss, Sascha verfasserin aut Impact of abdominal drainage systems on postoperative complication rates following liver transplantation 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background Depending on the extent of surgery, coagulation status and the number of anastomoses, drains are routinely used during liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to compare different drain types with regard to abdominal complication rates. Methods All consecutive full-size orthotopic liver transplantations (LTX) performed over a 7-year period were included in this retrospective analysis. Abdominal drain groups were divided into open-circuit drains and closed-circuit drains. Data are reported as total number (%) or median (range); for all comparisons a p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 256 LTX [age 56.89 (0.30–75.21) years; MELD 14.5 (7–40)] was included; 56 (21.8 %) patients received an open-circuit Easy Flow Drain (Group 1) and 200 (78.2 %) a closed-circuit Robinson Drainage System (Group 2). For Groups 1 and 2, overall infection rates were 78.6 and 56 % (p = 0.001), abdominal infection rates 50.82 and 21.92 % (p = 0.001), yeast infection rates 37 and 23 % (p = 0.02), abdominal bleeding rates 26.78 and 17 % (p = 0.07), biliary complication rates 14.28 and 13.5 % (p = 0.51), respectively. Conclusions In this retrospective series, open-circuit drains were associated with more abdominal complications, mainly due to intraabdominal infections, than were closed-circuit drains. Liver transplantation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Drainage systems (dpeaa)DE-He213 Postoperative complications (dpeaa)DE-He213 Open-circuit drainage (dpeaa)DE-He213 Closed-circuit drainage (dpeaa)DE-He213 Messner, Franka verfasserin aut Huth, Marcus verfasserin aut Weissenbacher, Annemarie verfasserin aut Denecke, Christian verfasserin aut Aigner, Felix verfasserin aut Brandl, Andreas verfasserin aut Dziodzio, Tomasz verfasserin aut Sucher, Robert verfasserin aut Boesmueller, Claudia verfasserin aut Oellinger, Robert verfasserin aut Schneeberger, Stefan verfasserin aut Oefner, Dietmar verfasserin aut Pratschke, Johann verfasserin aut Biebl, Matthias verfasserin aut Enthalten in European journal of medical research London : BioMed Central, 2000 20(2015), 1 vom: 21. Aug. (DE-627)375977775 (DE-600)2129989-4 2047-783X nnns volume:20 year:2015 number:1 day:21 month:08 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-015-0163-z kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 20 2015 1 21 08
allfields_unstemmed	10.1186/s40001-015-0163-z doi (DE-627)SPR032596286 (SPR)s40001-015-0163-z-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 ASE Weiss, Sascha verfasserin aut Impact of abdominal drainage systems on postoperative complication rates following liver transplantation 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background Depending on the extent of surgery, coagulation status and the number of anastomoses, drains are routinely used during liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to compare different drain types with regard to abdominal complication rates. Methods All consecutive full-size orthotopic liver transplantations (LTX) performed over a 7-year period were included in this retrospective analysis. Abdominal drain groups were divided into open-circuit drains and closed-circuit drains. Data are reported as total number (%) or median (range); for all comparisons a p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 256 LTX [age 56.89 (0.30–75.21) years; MELD 14.5 (7–40)] was included; 56 (21.8 %) patients received an open-circuit Easy Flow Drain (Group 1) and 200 (78.2 %) a closed-circuit Robinson Drainage System (Group 2). For Groups 1 and 2, overall infection rates were 78.6 and 56 % (p = 0.001), abdominal infection rates 50.82 and 21.92 % (p = 0.001), yeast infection rates 37 and 23 % (p = 0.02), abdominal bleeding rates 26.78 and 17 % (p = 0.07), biliary complication rates 14.28 and 13.5 % (p = 0.51), respectively. Conclusions In this retrospective series, open-circuit drains were associated with more abdominal complications, mainly due to intraabdominal infections, than were closed-circuit drains. Liver transplantation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Drainage systems (dpeaa)DE-He213 Postoperative complications (dpeaa)DE-He213 Open-circuit drainage (dpeaa)DE-He213 Closed-circuit drainage (dpeaa)DE-He213 Messner, Franka verfasserin aut Huth, Marcus verfasserin aut Weissenbacher, Annemarie verfasserin aut Denecke, Christian verfasserin aut Aigner, Felix verfasserin aut Brandl, Andreas verfasserin aut Dziodzio, Tomasz verfasserin aut Sucher, Robert verfasserin aut Boesmueller, Claudia verfasserin aut Oellinger, Robert verfasserin aut Schneeberger, Stefan verfasserin aut Oefner, Dietmar verfasserin aut Pratschke, Johann verfasserin aut Biebl, Matthias verfasserin aut Enthalten in European journal of medical research London : BioMed Central, 2000 20(2015), 1 vom: 21. Aug. (DE-627)375977775 (DE-600)2129989-4 2047-783X nnns volume:20 year:2015 number:1 day:21 month:08 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-015-0163-z kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 20 2015 1 21 08
allfieldsGer	10.1186/s40001-015-0163-z doi (DE-627)SPR032596286 (SPR)s40001-015-0163-z-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 ASE Weiss, Sascha verfasserin aut Impact of abdominal drainage systems on postoperative complication rates following liver transplantation 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background Depending on the extent of surgery, coagulation status and the number of anastomoses, drains are routinely used during liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to compare different drain types with regard to abdominal complication rates. Methods All consecutive full-size orthotopic liver transplantations (LTX) performed over a 7-year period were included in this retrospective analysis. Abdominal drain groups were divided into open-circuit drains and closed-circuit drains. Data are reported as total number (%) or median (range); for all comparisons a p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 256 LTX [age 56.89 (0.30–75.21) years; MELD 14.5 (7–40)] was included; 56 (21.8 %) patients received an open-circuit Easy Flow Drain (Group 1) and 200 (78.2 %) a closed-circuit Robinson Drainage System (Group 2). For Groups 1 and 2, overall infection rates were 78.6 and 56 % (p = 0.001), abdominal infection rates 50.82 and 21.92 % (p = 0.001), yeast infection rates 37 and 23 % (p = 0.02), abdominal bleeding rates 26.78 and 17 % (p = 0.07), biliary complication rates 14.28 and 13.5 % (p = 0.51), respectively. Conclusions In this retrospective series, open-circuit drains were associated with more abdominal complications, mainly due to intraabdominal infections, than were closed-circuit drains. Liver transplantation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Drainage systems (dpeaa)DE-He213 Postoperative complications (dpeaa)DE-He213 Open-circuit drainage (dpeaa)DE-He213 Closed-circuit drainage (dpeaa)DE-He213 Messner, Franka verfasserin aut Huth, Marcus verfasserin aut Weissenbacher, Annemarie verfasserin aut Denecke, Christian verfasserin aut Aigner, Felix verfasserin aut Brandl, Andreas verfasserin aut Dziodzio, Tomasz verfasserin aut Sucher, Robert verfasserin aut Boesmueller, Claudia verfasserin aut Oellinger, Robert verfasserin aut Schneeberger, Stefan verfasserin aut Oefner, Dietmar verfasserin aut Pratschke, Johann verfasserin aut Biebl, Matthias verfasserin aut Enthalten in European journal of medical research London : BioMed Central, 2000 20(2015), 1 vom: 21. Aug. (DE-627)375977775 (DE-600)2129989-4 2047-783X nnns volume:20 year:2015 number:1 day:21 month:08 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-015-0163-z kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 20 2015 1 21 08
allfieldsSound	10.1186/s40001-015-0163-z doi (DE-627)SPR032596286 (SPR)s40001-015-0163-z-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 ASE Weiss, Sascha verfasserin aut Impact of abdominal drainage systems on postoperative complication rates following liver transplantation 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background Depending on the extent of surgery, coagulation status and the number of anastomoses, drains are routinely used during liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to compare different drain types with regard to abdominal complication rates. Methods All consecutive full-size orthotopic liver transplantations (LTX) performed over a 7-year period were included in this retrospective analysis. Abdominal drain groups were divided into open-circuit drains and closed-circuit drains. Data are reported as total number (%) or median (range); for all comparisons a p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 256 LTX [age 56.89 (0.30–75.21) years; MELD 14.5 (7–40)] was included; 56 (21.8 %) patients received an open-circuit Easy Flow Drain (Group 1) and 200 (78.2 %) a closed-circuit Robinson Drainage System (Group 2). For Groups 1 and 2, overall infection rates were 78.6 and 56 % (p = 0.001), abdominal infection rates 50.82 and 21.92 % (p = 0.001), yeast infection rates 37 and 23 % (p = 0.02), abdominal bleeding rates 26.78 and 17 % (p = 0.07), biliary complication rates 14.28 and 13.5 % (p = 0.51), respectively. Conclusions In this retrospective series, open-circuit drains were associated with more abdominal complications, mainly due to intraabdominal infections, than were closed-circuit drains. Liver transplantation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Drainage systems (dpeaa)DE-He213 Postoperative complications (dpeaa)DE-He213 Open-circuit drainage (dpeaa)DE-He213 Closed-circuit drainage (dpeaa)DE-He213 Messner, Franka verfasserin aut Huth, Marcus verfasserin aut Weissenbacher, Annemarie verfasserin aut Denecke, Christian verfasserin aut Aigner, Felix verfasserin aut Brandl, Andreas verfasserin aut Dziodzio, Tomasz verfasserin aut Sucher, Robert verfasserin aut Boesmueller, Claudia verfasserin aut Oellinger, Robert verfasserin aut Schneeberger, Stefan verfasserin aut Oefner, Dietmar verfasserin aut Pratschke, Johann verfasserin aut Biebl, Matthias verfasserin aut Enthalten in European journal of medical research London : BioMed Central, 2000 20(2015), 1 vom: 21. Aug. (DE-627)375977775 (DE-600)2129989-4 2047-783X nnns volume:20 year:2015 number:1 day:21 month:08 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-015-0163-z kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 20 2015 1 21 08
language	English
source	Enthalten in European journal of medical research 20(2015), 1 vom: 21. Aug. volume:20 year:2015 number:1 day:21 month:08
sourceStr	Enthalten in European journal of medical research 20(2015), 1 vom: 21. Aug. volume:20 year:2015 number:1 day:21 month:08
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Liver transplantation Drainage systems Postoperative complications Open-circuit drainage Closed-circuit drainage
dewey-raw	610
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	European journal of medical research
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Weiss, Sascha @@aut@@ Messner, Franka @@aut@@ Huth, Marcus @@aut@@ Weissenbacher, Annemarie @@aut@@ Denecke, Christian @@aut@@ Aigner, Felix @@aut@@ Brandl, Andreas @@aut@@ Dziodzio, Tomasz @@aut@@ Sucher, Robert @@aut@@ Boesmueller, Claudia @@aut@@ Oellinger, Robert @@aut@@ Schneeberger, Stefan @@aut@@ Oefner, Dietmar @@aut@@ Pratschke, Johann @@aut@@ Biebl, Matthias @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2015-08-21T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	375977775
dewey-sort	3610
id	SPR032596286
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR032596286</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519194441.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2015 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/s40001-015-0163-z</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR032596286</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s40001-015-0163-z-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Weiss, Sascha</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Impact of abdominal drainage systems on postoperative complication rates following liver transplantation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background Depending on the extent of surgery, coagulation status and the number of anastomoses, drains are routinely used during liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to compare different drain types with regard to abdominal complication rates. Methods All consecutive full-size orthotopic liver transplantations (LTX) performed over a 7-year period were included in this retrospective analysis. Abdominal drain groups were divided into open-circuit drains and closed-circuit drains. Data are reported as total number (%) or median (range); for all comparisons a p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 256 LTX [age 56.89 (0.30–75.21) years; MELD 14.5 (7–40)] was included; 56 (21.8 %) patients received an open-circuit Easy Flow Drain (Group 1) and 200 (78.2 %) a closed-circuit Robinson Drainage System (Group 2). For Groups 1 and 2, overall infection rates were 78.6 and 56 % (p = 0.001), abdominal infection rates 50.82 and 21.92 % (p = 0.001), yeast infection rates 37 and 23 % (p = 0.02), abdominal bleeding rates 26.78 and 17 % (p = 0.07), biliary complication rates 14.28 and 13.5 % (p = 0.51), respectively. Conclusions In this retrospective series, open-circuit drains were associated with more abdominal complications, mainly due to intraabdominal infections, than were closed-circuit drains.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Liver transplantation</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Drainage systems</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Postoperative complications</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Open-circuit drainage</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Closed-circuit drainage</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Messner, Franka</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Huth, Marcus</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Weissenbacher, Annemarie</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Denecke, Christian</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aigner, Felix</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Brandl, Andreas</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dziodzio, Tomasz</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sucher, Robert</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Boesmueller, Claudia</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Oellinger, Robert</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schneeberger, Stefan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Oefner, Dietmar</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pratschke, Johann</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Biebl, Matthias</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">European journal of medical research</subfield><subfield code="d">London : BioMed Central, 2000</subfield><subfield code="g">20(2015), 1 vom: 21. Aug.</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)375977775</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2129989-4</subfield><subfield code="x">2047-783X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:20</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:21</subfield><subfield code="g">month:08</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-015-0163-z</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">20</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">21</subfield><subfield code="c">08</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Weiss, Sascha
spellingShingle	Weiss, Sascha ddc 610 misc Liver transplantation misc Drainage systems misc Postoperative complications misc Open-circuit drainage misc Closed-circuit drainage Impact of abdominal drainage systems on postoperative complication rates following liver transplantation
authorStr	Weiss, Sascha
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)375977775
format	electronic Article
dewey-ones	610 - Medicine & health
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	springer
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	2047-783X
topic_title	610 ASE Impact of abdominal drainage systems on postoperative complication rates following liver transplantation Liver transplantation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Drainage systems (dpeaa)DE-He213 Postoperative complications (dpeaa)DE-He213 Open-circuit drainage (dpeaa)DE-He213 Closed-circuit drainage (dpeaa)DE-He213
topic	ddc 610 misc Liver transplantation misc Drainage systems misc Postoperative complications misc Open-circuit drainage misc Closed-circuit drainage
topic_unstemmed	ddc 610 misc Liver transplantation misc Drainage systems misc Postoperative complications misc Open-circuit drainage misc Closed-circuit drainage
topic_browse	ddc 610 misc Liver transplantation misc Drainage systems misc Postoperative complications misc Open-circuit drainage misc Closed-circuit drainage
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	European journal of medical research
hierarchy_parent_id	375977775
dewey-tens	610 - Medicine & health
hierarchy_top_title	European journal of medical research
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)375977775 (DE-600)2129989-4
title	Impact of abdominal drainage systems on postoperative complication rates following liver transplantation
ctrlnum	(DE-627)SPR032596286 (SPR)s40001-015-0163-z-e
title_full	Impact of abdominal drainage systems on postoperative complication rates following liver transplantation
author_sort	Weiss, Sascha
journal	European journal of medical research
journalStr	European journal of medical research
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
dewey-hundreds	600 - Technology
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2015
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Weiss, Sascha Messner, Franka Huth, Marcus Weissenbacher, Annemarie Denecke, Christian Aigner, Felix Brandl, Andreas Dziodzio, Tomasz Sucher, Robert Boesmueller, Claudia Oellinger, Robert Schneeberger, Stefan Oefner, Dietmar Pratschke, Johann Biebl, Matthias
container_volume	20
class	610 ASE
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Weiss, Sascha
doi_str_mv	10.1186/s40001-015-0163-z
dewey-full	610
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	impact of abdominal drainage systems on postoperative complication rates following liver transplantation
title_auth	Impact of abdominal drainage systems on postoperative complication rates following liver transplantation
abstract	Background Depending on the extent of surgery, coagulation status and the number of anastomoses, drains are routinely used during liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to compare different drain types with regard to abdominal complication rates. Methods All consecutive full-size orthotopic liver transplantations (LTX) performed over a 7-year period were included in this retrospective analysis. Abdominal drain groups were divided into open-circuit drains and closed-circuit drains. Data are reported as total number (%) or median (range); for all comparisons a p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 256 LTX [age 56.89 (0.30–75.21) years; MELD 14.5 (7–40)] was included; 56 (21.8 %) patients received an open-circuit Easy Flow Drain (Group 1) and 200 (78.2 %) a closed-circuit Robinson Drainage System (Group 2). For Groups 1 and 2, overall infection rates were 78.6 and 56 % (p = 0.001), abdominal infection rates 50.82 and 21.92 % (p = 0.001), yeast infection rates 37 and 23 % (p = 0.02), abdominal bleeding rates 26.78 and 17 % (p = 0.07), biliary complication rates 14.28 and 13.5 % (p = 0.51), respectively. Conclusions In this retrospective series, open-circuit drains were associated with more abdominal complications, mainly due to intraabdominal infections, than were closed-circuit drains.
abstractGer	Background Depending on the extent of surgery, coagulation status and the number of anastomoses, drains are routinely used during liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to compare different drain types with regard to abdominal complication rates. Methods All consecutive full-size orthotopic liver transplantations (LTX) performed over a 7-year period were included in this retrospective analysis. Abdominal drain groups were divided into open-circuit drains and closed-circuit drains. Data are reported as total number (%) or median (range); for all comparisons a p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 256 LTX [age 56.89 (0.30–75.21) years; MELD 14.5 (7–40)] was included; 56 (21.8 %) patients received an open-circuit Easy Flow Drain (Group 1) and 200 (78.2 %) a closed-circuit Robinson Drainage System (Group 2). For Groups 1 and 2, overall infection rates were 78.6 and 56 % (p = 0.001), abdominal infection rates 50.82 and 21.92 % (p = 0.001), yeast infection rates 37 and 23 % (p = 0.02), abdominal bleeding rates 26.78 and 17 % (p = 0.07), biliary complication rates 14.28 and 13.5 % (p = 0.51), respectively. Conclusions In this retrospective series, open-circuit drains were associated with more abdominal complications, mainly due to intraabdominal infections, than were closed-circuit drains.
abstract_unstemmed	Background Depending on the extent of surgery, coagulation status and the number of anastomoses, drains are routinely used during liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to compare different drain types with regard to abdominal complication rates. Methods All consecutive full-size orthotopic liver transplantations (LTX) performed over a 7-year period were included in this retrospective analysis. Abdominal drain groups were divided into open-circuit drains and closed-circuit drains. Data are reported as total number (%) or median (range); for all comparisons a p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 256 LTX [age 56.89 (0.30–75.21) years; MELD 14.5 (7–40)] was included; 56 (21.8 %) patients received an open-circuit Easy Flow Drain (Group 1) and 200 (78.2 %) a closed-circuit Robinson Drainage System (Group 2). For Groups 1 and 2, overall infection rates were 78.6 and 56 % (p = 0.001), abdominal infection rates 50.82 and 21.92 % (p = 0.001), yeast infection rates 37 and 23 % (p = 0.02), abdominal bleeding rates 26.78 and 17 % (p = 0.07), biliary complication rates 14.28 and 13.5 % (p = 0.51), respectively. Conclusions In this retrospective series, open-circuit drains were associated with more abdominal complications, mainly due to intraabdominal infections, than were closed-circuit drains.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	1
title_short	Impact of abdominal drainage systems on postoperative complication rates following liver transplantation
url	https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-015-0163-z
remote_bool	true
author2	Messner, Franka Huth, Marcus Weissenbacher, Annemarie Denecke, Christian Aigner, Felix Brandl, Andreas Dziodzio, Tomasz Sucher, Robert Boesmueller, Claudia Oellinger, Robert Schneeberger, Stefan Oefner, Dietmar Pratschke, Johann Biebl, Matthias
author2Str	Messner, Franka Huth, Marcus Weissenbacher, Annemarie Denecke, Christian Aigner, Felix Brandl, Andreas Dziodzio, Tomasz Sucher, Robert Boesmueller, Claudia Oellinger, Robert Schneeberger, Stefan Oefner, Dietmar Pratschke, Johann Biebl, Matthias
ppnlink	375977775
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1186/s40001-015-0163-z
up_date	2024-07-03T13:44:27.070Z
_version_	1803565680110338048
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR032596286</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519194441.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2015 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/s40001-015-0163-z</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR032596286</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s40001-015-0163-z-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Weiss, Sascha</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Impact of abdominal drainage systems on postoperative complication rates following liver transplantation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background Depending on the extent of surgery, coagulation status and the number of anastomoses, drains are routinely used during liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to compare different drain types with regard to abdominal complication rates. Methods All consecutive full-size orthotopic liver transplantations (LTX) performed over a 7-year period were included in this retrospective analysis. Abdominal drain groups were divided into open-circuit drains and closed-circuit drains. Data are reported as total number (%) or median (range); for all comparisons a p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 256 LTX [age 56.89 (0.30–75.21) years; MELD 14.5 (7–40)] was included; 56 (21.8 %) patients received an open-circuit Easy Flow Drain (Group 1) and 200 (78.2 %) a closed-circuit Robinson Drainage System (Group 2). For Groups 1 and 2, overall infection rates were 78.6 and 56 % (p = 0.001), abdominal infection rates 50.82 and 21.92 % (p = 0.001), yeast infection rates 37 and 23 % (p = 0.02), abdominal bleeding rates 26.78 and 17 % (p = 0.07), biliary complication rates 14.28 and 13.5 % (p = 0.51), respectively. Conclusions In this retrospective series, open-circuit drains were associated with more abdominal complications, mainly due to intraabdominal infections, than were closed-circuit drains.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Liver transplantation</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Drainage systems</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Postoperative complications</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Open-circuit drainage</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Closed-circuit drainage</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Messner, Franka</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Huth, Marcus</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Weissenbacher, Annemarie</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Denecke, Christian</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aigner, Felix</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Brandl, Andreas</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dziodzio, Tomasz</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sucher, Robert</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Boesmueller, Claudia</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Oellinger, Robert</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schneeberger, Stefan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Oefner, Dietmar</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pratschke, Johann</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Biebl, Matthias</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">European journal of medical research</subfield><subfield code="d">London : BioMed Central, 2000</subfield><subfield code="g">20(2015), 1 vom: 21. Aug.</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)375977775</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2129989-4</subfield><subfield code="x">2047-783X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:20</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:21</subfield><subfield code="g">month:08</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-015-0163-z</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">20</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">21</subfield><subfield code="c">08</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.4011087

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Impact of abdominal drainage systems on postoperative complication rates following liver transplantation

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?