Uptake and barriers to the use of geospatial technologies in forest management

Background A survey was conducted to assess the uptake, and barriers to use, of geospatial tools and technologies amongst New Zealand’s plantation forestry sector. Methods Responses were received from 17 companies representing 63% of New Zealand’s plantation forest by area. A wide range of company s...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Morgenroth, Justin [verfasserIn] Visser, Rien

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2013

Schlagwörter:	Aerial laser scanning Aerial photography GPS GIS LiDAR Remote sensing Satellite imagery Survey

Anmerkung:	© Morgenroth and Visser; licensee Springer. 2013. This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: New Zealand journal of forestry science - Berlin : SpringerOpen, 1971, 43(2013), 1 vom: 11. Dez.
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:43 ; year:2013 ; number:1 ; day:11 ; month:12

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.1186/1179-5395-43-16

Katalog-ID:	SPR036526754

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	SPR036526754
003	DE-627
005	20230328190856.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	201007s2013 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1186/1179-5395-43-16 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)SPR036526754
035			\|a (SPR)1179-5395-43-16-e
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
100	1		\|a Morgenroth, Justin \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Uptake and barriers to the use of geospatial technologies in forest management
264		1	\|c 2013
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
500			\|a © Morgenroth and Visser; licensee Springer. 2013. This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
520			\|a Background A survey was conducted to assess the uptake, and barriers to use, of geospatial tools and technologies amongst New Zealand’s plantation forestry sector. Methods Responses were received from 17 companies representing 63% of New Zealand’s plantation forest by area. A wide range of company sizes were surveyed (net stocked areas ranged from 4,000 – 200,000 hectares), and 7 of the 17 have international operations. Results Survey results suggest that freely available topography, climate, and soil datasets have limited utility, as forest management at the operational level requires higher resolution, remotely sensed data. The most common supplemental data are aerial photography or satellite imagery. High spatial resolution was more highly valued by respondents than spectral diversity (i.e. number of channels); only six companies regularly use imagery containing an infrared band. LiDAR data has been used regularly by only three New Zealand forestry companies, while another six have tried it, suggesting it is an emerging technology in New Zealand. The use of generic GIS software was common amongst all respondents (14 use the ESRI product ArcGIS, three use MapInfo produced by Pitney Bowes). The utility of ArcGIS, in particular, was enhanced by locally developed extensions designed to address specific operational tasks performed regularly by New Zealand’s forestry companies. Conclusions While it is clear that geospatial data and tools are generally adopted by New Zealand’s forest industry, cost-related barriers prevent their widespread adoption. Interestingly, a lack of staff knowledge was also conceded an impediment to uptake, alluding to the importance of tertiary education in the geospatial sciences and continuing education for practitioners.
650		4	\|a Aerial laser scanning \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Aerial photography \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a GPS \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a GIS \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a LiDAR \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Remote sensing \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Satellite imagery \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Survey \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
700	1		\|a Visser, Rien \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t New Zealand journal of forestry science \|d Berlin : SpringerOpen, 1971 \|g 43(2013), 1 vom: 11. Dez. \|w (DE-627)593140486 \|w (DE-600)2482291-7 \|x 1179-5395 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:43 \|g year:2013 \|g number:1 \|g day:11 \|g month:12
856	4	0	\|u https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1179-5395-43-16 \|z kostenfrei \|3 Volltext
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_SPRINGER
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 43 \|j 2013 \|e 1 \|b 11 \|c 12

Indexfelder

author_variant	j m jm r v rv
matchkey_str	article:11795395:2013----::paenbrirttesogoptatcnlge
hierarchy_sort_str	2013
publishDate	2013
allfields	10.1186/1179-5395-43-16 doi (DE-627)SPR036526754 (SPR)1179-5395-43-16-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Morgenroth, Justin verfasserin aut Uptake and barriers to the use of geospatial technologies in forest management 2013 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Morgenroth and Visser; licensee Springer. 2013. This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Background A survey was conducted to assess the uptake, and barriers to use, of geospatial tools and technologies amongst New Zealand’s plantation forestry sector. Methods Responses were received from 17 companies representing 63% of New Zealand’s plantation forest by area. A wide range of company sizes were surveyed (net stocked areas ranged from 4,000 – 200,000 hectares), and 7 of the 17 have international operations. Results Survey results suggest that freely available topography, climate, and soil datasets have limited utility, as forest management at the operational level requires higher resolution, remotely sensed data. The most common supplemental data are aerial photography or satellite imagery. High spatial resolution was more highly valued by respondents than spectral diversity (i.e. number of channels); only six companies regularly use imagery containing an infrared band. LiDAR data has been used regularly by only three New Zealand forestry companies, while another six have tried it, suggesting it is an emerging technology in New Zealand. The use of generic GIS software was common amongst all respondents (14 use the ESRI product ArcGIS, three use MapInfo produced by Pitney Bowes). The utility of ArcGIS, in particular, was enhanced by locally developed extensions designed to address specific operational tasks performed regularly by New Zealand’s forestry companies. Conclusions While it is clear that geospatial data and tools are generally adopted by New Zealand’s forest industry, cost-related barriers prevent their widespread adoption. Interestingly, a lack of staff knowledge was also conceded an impediment to uptake, alluding to the importance of tertiary education in the geospatial sciences and continuing education for practitioners. Aerial laser scanning (dpeaa)DE-He213 Aerial photography (dpeaa)DE-He213 GPS (dpeaa)DE-He213 GIS (dpeaa)DE-He213 LiDAR (dpeaa)DE-He213 Remote sensing (dpeaa)DE-He213 Satellite imagery (dpeaa)DE-He213 Survey (dpeaa)DE-He213 Visser, Rien aut Enthalten in New Zealand journal of forestry science Berlin : SpringerOpen, 1971 43(2013), 1 vom: 11. Dez. (DE-627)593140486 (DE-600)2482291-7 1179-5395 nnns volume:43 year:2013 number:1 day:11 month:12 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1179-5395-43-16 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 43 2013 1 11 12
spelling	10.1186/1179-5395-43-16 doi (DE-627)SPR036526754 (SPR)1179-5395-43-16-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Morgenroth, Justin verfasserin aut Uptake and barriers to the use of geospatial technologies in forest management 2013 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Morgenroth and Visser; licensee Springer. 2013. This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Background A survey was conducted to assess the uptake, and barriers to use, of geospatial tools and technologies amongst New Zealand’s plantation forestry sector. Methods Responses were received from 17 companies representing 63% of New Zealand’s plantation forest by area. A wide range of company sizes were surveyed (net stocked areas ranged from 4,000 – 200,000 hectares), and 7 of the 17 have international operations. Results Survey results suggest that freely available topography, climate, and soil datasets have limited utility, as forest management at the operational level requires higher resolution, remotely sensed data. The most common supplemental data are aerial photography or satellite imagery. High spatial resolution was more highly valued by respondents than spectral diversity (i.e. number of channels); only six companies regularly use imagery containing an infrared band. LiDAR data has been used regularly by only three New Zealand forestry companies, while another six have tried it, suggesting it is an emerging technology in New Zealand. The use of generic GIS software was common amongst all respondents (14 use the ESRI product ArcGIS, three use MapInfo produced by Pitney Bowes). The utility of ArcGIS, in particular, was enhanced by locally developed extensions designed to address specific operational tasks performed regularly by New Zealand’s forestry companies. Conclusions While it is clear that geospatial data and tools are generally adopted by New Zealand’s forest industry, cost-related barriers prevent their widespread adoption. Interestingly, a lack of staff knowledge was also conceded an impediment to uptake, alluding to the importance of tertiary education in the geospatial sciences and continuing education for practitioners. Aerial laser scanning (dpeaa)DE-He213 Aerial photography (dpeaa)DE-He213 GPS (dpeaa)DE-He213 GIS (dpeaa)DE-He213 LiDAR (dpeaa)DE-He213 Remote sensing (dpeaa)DE-He213 Satellite imagery (dpeaa)DE-He213 Survey (dpeaa)DE-He213 Visser, Rien aut Enthalten in New Zealand journal of forestry science Berlin : SpringerOpen, 1971 43(2013), 1 vom: 11. Dez. (DE-627)593140486 (DE-600)2482291-7 1179-5395 nnns volume:43 year:2013 number:1 day:11 month:12 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1179-5395-43-16 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 43 2013 1 11 12
allfields_unstemmed	10.1186/1179-5395-43-16 doi (DE-627)SPR036526754 (SPR)1179-5395-43-16-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Morgenroth, Justin verfasserin aut Uptake and barriers to the use of geospatial technologies in forest management 2013 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Morgenroth and Visser; licensee Springer. 2013. This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Background A survey was conducted to assess the uptake, and barriers to use, of geospatial tools and technologies amongst New Zealand’s plantation forestry sector. Methods Responses were received from 17 companies representing 63% of New Zealand’s plantation forest by area. A wide range of company sizes were surveyed (net stocked areas ranged from 4,000 – 200,000 hectares), and 7 of the 17 have international operations. Results Survey results suggest that freely available topography, climate, and soil datasets have limited utility, as forest management at the operational level requires higher resolution, remotely sensed data. The most common supplemental data are aerial photography or satellite imagery. High spatial resolution was more highly valued by respondents than spectral diversity (i.e. number of channels); only six companies regularly use imagery containing an infrared band. LiDAR data has been used regularly by only three New Zealand forestry companies, while another six have tried it, suggesting it is an emerging technology in New Zealand. The use of generic GIS software was common amongst all respondents (14 use the ESRI product ArcGIS, three use MapInfo produced by Pitney Bowes). The utility of ArcGIS, in particular, was enhanced by locally developed extensions designed to address specific operational tasks performed regularly by New Zealand’s forestry companies. Conclusions While it is clear that geospatial data and tools are generally adopted by New Zealand’s forest industry, cost-related barriers prevent their widespread adoption. Interestingly, a lack of staff knowledge was also conceded an impediment to uptake, alluding to the importance of tertiary education in the geospatial sciences and continuing education for practitioners. Aerial laser scanning (dpeaa)DE-He213 Aerial photography (dpeaa)DE-He213 GPS (dpeaa)DE-He213 GIS (dpeaa)DE-He213 LiDAR (dpeaa)DE-He213 Remote sensing (dpeaa)DE-He213 Satellite imagery (dpeaa)DE-He213 Survey (dpeaa)DE-He213 Visser, Rien aut Enthalten in New Zealand journal of forestry science Berlin : SpringerOpen, 1971 43(2013), 1 vom: 11. Dez. (DE-627)593140486 (DE-600)2482291-7 1179-5395 nnns volume:43 year:2013 number:1 day:11 month:12 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1179-5395-43-16 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 43 2013 1 11 12
allfieldsGer	10.1186/1179-5395-43-16 doi (DE-627)SPR036526754 (SPR)1179-5395-43-16-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Morgenroth, Justin verfasserin aut Uptake and barriers to the use of geospatial technologies in forest management 2013 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Morgenroth and Visser; licensee Springer. 2013. This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Background A survey was conducted to assess the uptake, and barriers to use, of geospatial tools and technologies amongst New Zealand’s plantation forestry sector. Methods Responses were received from 17 companies representing 63% of New Zealand’s plantation forest by area. A wide range of company sizes were surveyed (net stocked areas ranged from 4,000 – 200,000 hectares), and 7 of the 17 have international operations. Results Survey results suggest that freely available topography, climate, and soil datasets have limited utility, as forest management at the operational level requires higher resolution, remotely sensed data. The most common supplemental data are aerial photography or satellite imagery. High spatial resolution was more highly valued by respondents than spectral diversity (i.e. number of channels); only six companies regularly use imagery containing an infrared band. LiDAR data has been used regularly by only three New Zealand forestry companies, while another six have tried it, suggesting it is an emerging technology in New Zealand. The use of generic GIS software was common amongst all respondents (14 use the ESRI product ArcGIS, three use MapInfo produced by Pitney Bowes). The utility of ArcGIS, in particular, was enhanced by locally developed extensions designed to address specific operational tasks performed regularly by New Zealand’s forestry companies. Conclusions While it is clear that geospatial data and tools are generally adopted by New Zealand’s forest industry, cost-related barriers prevent their widespread adoption. Interestingly, a lack of staff knowledge was also conceded an impediment to uptake, alluding to the importance of tertiary education in the geospatial sciences and continuing education for practitioners. Aerial laser scanning (dpeaa)DE-He213 Aerial photography (dpeaa)DE-He213 GPS (dpeaa)DE-He213 GIS (dpeaa)DE-He213 LiDAR (dpeaa)DE-He213 Remote sensing (dpeaa)DE-He213 Satellite imagery (dpeaa)DE-He213 Survey (dpeaa)DE-He213 Visser, Rien aut Enthalten in New Zealand journal of forestry science Berlin : SpringerOpen, 1971 43(2013), 1 vom: 11. Dez. (DE-627)593140486 (DE-600)2482291-7 1179-5395 nnns volume:43 year:2013 number:1 day:11 month:12 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1179-5395-43-16 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 43 2013 1 11 12
allfieldsSound	10.1186/1179-5395-43-16 doi (DE-627)SPR036526754 (SPR)1179-5395-43-16-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Morgenroth, Justin verfasserin aut Uptake and barriers to the use of geospatial technologies in forest management 2013 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Morgenroth and Visser; licensee Springer. 2013. This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Background A survey was conducted to assess the uptake, and barriers to use, of geospatial tools and technologies amongst New Zealand’s plantation forestry sector. Methods Responses were received from 17 companies representing 63% of New Zealand’s plantation forest by area. A wide range of company sizes were surveyed (net stocked areas ranged from 4,000 – 200,000 hectares), and 7 of the 17 have international operations. Results Survey results suggest that freely available topography, climate, and soil datasets have limited utility, as forest management at the operational level requires higher resolution, remotely sensed data. The most common supplemental data are aerial photography or satellite imagery. High spatial resolution was more highly valued by respondents than spectral diversity (i.e. number of channels); only six companies regularly use imagery containing an infrared band. LiDAR data has been used regularly by only three New Zealand forestry companies, while another six have tried it, suggesting it is an emerging technology in New Zealand. The use of generic GIS software was common amongst all respondents (14 use the ESRI product ArcGIS, three use MapInfo produced by Pitney Bowes). The utility of ArcGIS, in particular, was enhanced by locally developed extensions designed to address specific operational tasks performed regularly by New Zealand’s forestry companies. Conclusions While it is clear that geospatial data and tools are generally adopted by New Zealand’s forest industry, cost-related barriers prevent their widespread adoption. Interestingly, a lack of staff knowledge was also conceded an impediment to uptake, alluding to the importance of tertiary education in the geospatial sciences and continuing education for practitioners. Aerial laser scanning (dpeaa)DE-He213 Aerial photography (dpeaa)DE-He213 GPS (dpeaa)DE-He213 GIS (dpeaa)DE-He213 LiDAR (dpeaa)DE-He213 Remote sensing (dpeaa)DE-He213 Satellite imagery (dpeaa)DE-He213 Survey (dpeaa)DE-He213 Visser, Rien aut Enthalten in New Zealand journal of forestry science Berlin : SpringerOpen, 1971 43(2013), 1 vom: 11. Dez. (DE-627)593140486 (DE-600)2482291-7 1179-5395 nnns volume:43 year:2013 number:1 day:11 month:12 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1179-5395-43-16 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 43 2013 1 11 12
language	English
source	Enthalten in New Zealand journal of forestry science 43(2013), 1 vom: 11. Dez. volume:43 year:2013 number:1 day:11 month:12
sourceStr	Enthalten in New Zealand journal of forestry science 43(2013), 1 vom: 11. Dez. volume:43 year:2013 number:1 day:11 month:12
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Aerial laser scanning Aerial photography GPS GIS LiDAR Remote sensing Satellite imagery Survey
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	New Zealand journal of forestry science
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Morgenroth, Justin @@aut@@ Visser, Rien @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2013-12-11T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	593140486
id	SPR036526754
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR036526754</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230328190856.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2013 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/1179-5395-43-16</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR036526754</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)1179-5395-43-16-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Morgenroth, Justin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Uptake and barriers to the use of geospatial technologies in forest management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Morgenroth and Visser; licensee Springer. 2013. This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background A survey was conducted to assess the uptake, and barriers to use, of geospatial tools and technologies amongst New Zealand’s plantation forestry sector. Methods Responses were received from 17 companies representing 63% of New Zealand’s plantation forest by area. A wide range of company sizes were surveyed (net stocked areas ranged from 4,000 – 200,000 hectares), and 7 of the 17 have international operations. Results Survey results suggest that freely available topography, climate, and soil datasets have limited utility, as forest management at the operational level requires higher resolution, remotely sensed data. The most common supplemental data are aerial photography or satellite imagery. High spatial resolution was more highly valued by respondents than spectral diversity (i.e. number of channels); only six companies regularly use imagery containing an infrared band. LiDAR data has been used regularly by only three New Zealand forestry companies, while another six have tried it, suggesting it is an emerging technology in New Zealand. The use of generic GIS software was common amongst all respondents (14 use the ESRI product ArcGIS, three use MapInfo produced by Pitney Bowes). The utility of ArcGIS, in particular, was enhanced by locally developed extensions designed to address specific operational tasks performed regularly by New Zealand’s forestry companies. Conclusions While it is clear that geospatial data and tools are generally adopted by New Zealand’s forest industry, cost-related barriers prevent their widespread adoption. Interestingly, a lack of staff knowledge was also conceded an impediment to uptake, alluding to the importance of tertiary education in the geospatial sciences and continuing education for practitioners.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Aerial laser scanning</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Aerial photography</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">GPS</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">GIS</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">LiDAR</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Remote sensing</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Satellite imagery</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Survey</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Visser, Rien</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">New Zealand journal of forestry science</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : SpringerOpen, 1971</subfield><subfield code="g">43(2013), 1 vom: 11. Dez.</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)593140486</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2482291-7</subfield><subfield code="x">1179-5395</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:43</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2013</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:11</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1179-5395-43-16</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">43</subfield><subfield code="j">2013</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">11</subfield><subfield code="c">12</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Morgenroth, Justin
spellingShingle	Morgenroth, Justin misc Aerial laser scanning misc Aerial photography misc GPS misc GIS misc LiDAR misc Remote sensing misc Satellite imagery misc Survey Uptake and barriers to the use of geospatial technologies in forest management
authorStr	Morgenroth, Justin
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)593140486
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut
collection	springer
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	1179-5395
topic_title	Uptake and barriers to the use of geospatial technologies in forest management Aerial laser scanning (dpeaa)DE-He213 Aerial photography (dpeaa)DE-He213 GPS (dpeaa)DE-He213 GIS (dpeaa)DE-He213 LiDAR (dpeaa)DE-He213 Remote sensing (dpeaa)DE-He213 Satellite imagery (dpeaa)DE-He213 Survey (dpeaa)DE-He213
topic	misc Aerial laser scanning misc Aerial photography misc GPS misc GIS misc LiDAR misc Remote sensing misc Satellite imagery misc Survey
topic_unstemmed	misc Aerial laser scanning misc Aerial photography misc GPS misc GIS misc LiDAR misc Remote sensing misc Satellite imagery misc Survey
topic_browse	misc Aerial laser scanning misc Aerial photography misc GPS misc GIS misc LiDAR misc Remote sensing misc Satellite imagery misc Survey
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	New Zealand journal of forestry science
hierarchy_parent_id	593140486
hierarchy_top_title	New Zealand journal of forestry science
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)593140486 (DE-600)2482291-7
title	Uptake and barriers to the use of geospatial technologies in forest management
ctrlnum	(DE-627)SPR036526754 (SPR)1179-5395-43-16-e
title_full	Uptake and barriers to the use of geospatial technologies in forest management
author_sort	Morgenroth, Justin
journal	New Zealand journal of forestry science
journalStr	New Zealand journal of forestry science
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2013
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Morgenroth, Justin Visser, Rien
container_volume	43
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Morgenroth, Justin
doi_str_mv	10.1186/1179-5395-43-16
title_sort	uptake and barriers to the use of geospatial technologies in forest management
title_auth	Uptake and barriers to the use of geospatial technologies in forest management
abstract	Background A survey was conducted to assess the uptake, and barriers to use, of geospatial tools and technologies amongst New Zealand’s plantation forestry sector. Methods Responses were received from 17 companies representing 63% of New Zealand’s plantation forest by area. A wide range of company sizes were surveyed (net stocked areas ranged from 4,000 – 200,000 hectares), and 7 of the 17 have international operations. Results Survey results suggest that freely available topography, climate, and soil datasets have limited utility, as forest management at the operational level requires higher resolution, remotely sensed data. The most common supplemental data are aerial photography or satellite imagery. High spatial resolution was more highly valued by respondents than spectral diversity (i.e. number of channels); only six companies regularly use imagery containing an infrared band. LiDAR data has been used regularly by only three New Zealand forestry companies, while another six have tried it, suggesting it is an emerging technology in New Zealand. The use of generic GIS software was common amongst all respondents (14 use the ESRI product ArcGIS, three use MapInfo produced by Pitney Bowes). The utility of ArcGIS, in particular, was enhanced by locally developed extensions designed to address specific operational tasks performed regularly by New Zealand’s forestry companies. Conclusions While it is clear that geospatial data and tools are generally adopted by New Zealand’s forest industry, cost-related barriers prevent their widespread adoption. Interestingly, a lack of staff knowledge was also conceded an impediment to uptake, alluding to the importance of tertiary education in the geospatial sciences and continuing education for practitioners. © Morgenroth and Visser; licensee Springer. 2013. This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
abstractGer	Background A survey was conducted to assess the uptake, and barriers to use, of geospatial tools and technologies amongst New Zealand’s plantation forestry sector. Methods Responses were received from 17 companies representing 63% of New Zealand’s plantation forest by area. A wide range of company sizes were surveyed (net stocked areas ranged from 4,000 – 200,000 hectares), and 7 of the 17 have international operations. Results Survey results suggest that freely available topography, climate, and soil datasets have limited utility, as forest management at the operational level requires higher resolution, remotely sensed data. The most common supplemental data are aerial photography or satellite imagery. High spatial resolution was more highly valued by respondents than spectral diversity (i.e. number of channels); only six companies regularly use imagery containing an infrared band. LiDAR data has been used regularly by only three New Zealand forestry companies, while another six have tried it, suggesting it is an emerging technology in New Zealand. The use of generic GIS software was common amongst all respondents (14 use the ESRI product ArcGIS, three use MapInfo produced by Pitney Bowes). The utility of ArcGIS, in particular, was enhanced by locally developed extensions designed to address specific operational tasks performed regularly by New Zealand’s forestry companies. Conclusions While it is clear that geospatial data and tools are generally adopted by New Zealand’s forest industry, cost-related barriers prevent their widespread adoption. Interestingly, a lack of staff knowledge was also conceded an impediment to uptake, alluding to the importance of tertiary education in the geospatial sciences and continuing education for practitioners. © Morgenroth and Visser; licensee Springer. 2013. This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
abstract_unstemmed	Background A survey was conducted to assess the uptake, and barriers to use, of geospatial tools and technologies amongst New Zealand’s plantation forestry sector. Methods Responses were received from 17 companies representing 63% of New Zealand’s plantation forest by area. A wide range of company sizes were surveyed (net stocked areas ranged from 4,000 – 200,000 hectares), and 7 of the 17 have international operations. Results Survey results suggest that freely available topography, climate, and soil datasets have limited utility, as forest management at the operational level requires higher resolution, remotely sensed data. The most common supplemental data are aerial photography or satellite imagery. High spatial resolution was more highly valued by respondents than spectral diversity (i.e. number of channels); only six companies regularly use imagery containing an infrared band. LiDAR data has been used regularly by only three New Zealand forestry companies, while another six have tried it, suggesting it is an emerging technology in New Zealand. The use of generic GIS software was common amongst all respondents (14 use the ESRI product ArcGIS, three use MapInfo produced by Pitney Bowes). The utility of ArcGIS, in particular, was enhanced by locally developed extensions designed to address specific operational tasks performed regularly by New Zealand’s forestry companies. Conclusions While it is clear that geospatial data and tools are generally adopted by New Zealand’s forest industry, cost-related barriers prevent their widespread adoption. Interestingly, a lack of staff knowledge was also conceded an impediment to uptake, alluding to the importance of tertiary education in the geospatial sciences and continuing education for practitioners. © Morgenroth and Visser; licensee Springer. 2013. This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	1
title_short	Uptake and barriers to the use of geospatial technologies in forest management
url	https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1179-5395-43-16
remote_bool	true
author2	Visser, Rien
author2Str	Visser, Rien
ppnlink	593140486
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1186/1179-5395-43-16
up_date	2024-07-03T18:09:49.599Z
_version_	1803582376091058176
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR036526754</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230328190856.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2013 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/1179-5395-43-16</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR036526754</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)1179-5395-43-16-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Morgenroth, Justin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Uptake and barriers to the use of geospatial technologies in forest management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Morgenroth and Visser; licensee Springer. 2013. This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background A survey was conducted to assess the uptake, and barriers to use, of geospatial tools and technologies amongst New Zealand’s plantation forestry sector. Methods Responses were received from 17 companies representing 63% of New Zealand’s plantation forest by area. A wide range of company sizes were surveyed (net stocked areas ranged from 4,000 – 200,000 hectares), and 7 of the 17 have international operations. Results Survey results suggest that freely available topography, climate, and soil datasets have limited utility, as forest management at the operational level requires higher resolution, remotely sensed data. The most common supplemental data are aerial photography or satellite imagery. High spatial resolution was more highly valued by respondents than spectral diversity (i.e. number of channels); only six companies regularly use imagery containing an infrared band. LiDAR data has been used regularly by only three New Zealand forestry companies, while another six have tried it, suggesting it is an emerging technology in New Zealand. The use of generic GIS software was common amongst all respondents (14 use the ESRI product ArcGIS, three use MapInfo produced by Pitney Bowes). The utility of ArcGIS, in particular, was enhanced by locally developed extensions designed to address specific operational tasks performed regularly by New Zealand’s forestry companies. Conclusions While it is clear that geospatial data and tools are generally adopted by New Zealand’s forest industry, cost-related barriers prevent their widespread adoption. Interestingly, a lack of staff knowledge was also conceded an impediment to uptake, alluding to the importance of tertiary education in the geospatial sciences and continuing education for practitioners.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Aerial laser scanning</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Aerial photography</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">GPS</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">GIS</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">LiDAR</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Remote sensing</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Satellite imagery</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Survey</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Visser, Rien</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">New Zealand journal of forestry science</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : SpringerOpen, 1971</subfield><subfield code="g">43(2013), 1 vom: 11. Dez.</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)593140486</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2482291-7</subfield><subfield code="x">1179-5395</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:43</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2013</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:11</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1179-5395-43-16</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">43</subfield><subfield code="j">2013</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">11</subfield><subfield code="c">12</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.4009867

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Uptake and barriers to the use of geospatial technologies in forest management

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?