Conditioned suppression of operant responding in response to a stimulus paired with pentobarbital injections
Abstract Conditioned suppression of ongoing behavior in response to a stimulus paired with barbiturate treatment was investigated in rats leverpressing for food pellets by presenting an audiovisual stimulus (conditioned stimulus [CS]) 3 min before injection of 15 mg/kg sodium pentobarbital (experime...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Duncan, Perry M. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
1997 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1997 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Physiological Psychology - Springer-Verlag, 1973, 25(1997), 2 vom: Juni, Seite 146-151 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:25 ; year:1997 ; number:2 ; month:06 ; pages:146-151 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.3758/BF03331920 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR037020641 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR037020641 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230519132035.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201007s1997 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3758/BF03331920 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR037020641 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)BF03331920-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Duncan, Perry M. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Conditioned suppression of operant responding in response to a stimulus paired with pentobarbital injections |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1997 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1997 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Conditioned suppression of ongoing behavior in response to a stimulus paired with barbiturate treatment was investigated in rats leverpressing for food pellets by presenting an audiovisual stimulus (conditioned stimulus [CS]) 3 min before injection of 15 mg/kg sodium pentobarbital (experimental group, n = 9) or water (control group, n = 8). The experimental rats completely stopped responding during the 20-min postinjection period. During 12 conditioning days, the experimental group developed conditioned suppression to the preinjection CS as indicated by decreases in response rate to 35% of baseline, significantly different from the 70% control group mean. The preinjection conditioned response lowered response rate, as did the actual drug treatment. Visual observation revealed that the CS elicited locomotor activity that interfered with leverpressing, indicating that although the conditioned response rate change was “isodirectional” to the drug effect (unconditioned response), an opposite-direction conditioned locomotor conditioned response was elicited by preinjection stimuli. The ability of the injection procedure to elicit conditioned responses was determined after 12 conditioning days in an extinction-test session in which water only was injected in both groups. Neither significant conditioned suppression nor conditioned motor activity was elicited by the injection procedure. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Conditioned Stimulus |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Unconditioned Stimulus |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Conditioned Response |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Conditioned Suppression |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Unconditioned Response |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Physiological Psychology |d Springer-Verlag, 1973 |g 25(1997), 2 vom: Juni, Seite 146-151 |w (DE-627)SPR037003089 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:25 |g year:1997 |g number:2 |g month:06 |g pages:146-151 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03331920 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 25 |j 1997 |e 2 |c 06 |h 146-151 | ||
| author_variant |
p m d pm pmd |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
duncanperrym:1997----:odtoesprsinfprnrsodnirsostatmlsard |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
1997 |
| publishDate |
1997 |
| allfields |
10.3758/BF03331920 doi (DE-627)SPR037020641 (SPR)BF03331920-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Duncan, Perry M. verfasserin aut Conditioned suppression of operant responding in response to a stimulus paired with pentobarbital injections 1997 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1997 Abstract Conditioned suppression of ongoing behavior in response to a stimulus paired with barbiturate treatment was investigated in rats leverpressing for food pellets by presenting an audiovisual stimulus (conditioned stimulus [CS]) 3 min before injection of 15 mg/kg sodium pentobarbital (experimental group, n = 9) or water (control group, n = 8). The experimental rats completely stopped responding during the 20-min postinjection period. During 12 conditioning days, the experimental group developed conditioned suppression to the preinjection CS as indicated by decreases in response rate to 35% of baseline, significantly different from the 70% control group mean. The preinjection conditioned response lowered response rate, as did the actual drug treatment. Visual observation revealed that the CS elicited locomotor activity that interfered with leverpressing, indicating that although the conditioned response rate change was “isodirectional” to the drug effect (unconditioned response), an opposite-direction conditioned locomotor conditioned response was elicited by preinjection stimuli. The ability of the injection procedure to elicit conditioned responses was determined after 12 conditioning days in an extinction-test session in which water only was injected in both groups. Neither significant conditioned suppression nor conditioned motor activity was elicited by the injection procedure. Conditioned Stimulus (dpeaa)DE-He213 Unconditioned Stimulus (dpeaa)DE-He213 Conditioned Response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Conditioned Suppression (dpeaa)DE-He213 Unconditioned Response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enthalten in Physiological Psychology Springer-Verlag, 1973 25(1997), 2 vom: Juni, Seite 146-151 (DE-627)SPR037003089 nnns volume:25 year:1997 number:2 month:06 pages:146-151 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03331920 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA AR 25 1997 2 06 146-151 |
| spelling |
10.3758/BF03331920 doi (DE-627)SPR037020641 (SPR)BF03331920-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Duncan, Perry M. verfasserin aut Conditioned suppression of operant responding in response to a stimulus paired with pentobarbital injections 1997 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1997 Abstract Conditioned suppression of ongoing behavior in response to a stimulus paired with barbiturate treatment was investigated in rats leverpressing for food pellets by presenting an audiovisual stimulus (conditioned stimulus [CS]) 3 min before injection of 15 mg/kg sodium pentobarbital (experimental group, n = 9) or water (control group, n = 8). The experimental rats completely stopped responding during the 20-min postinjection period. During 12 conditioning days, the experimental group developed conditioned suppression to the preinjection CS as indicated by decreases in response rate to 35% of baseline, significantly different from the 70% control group mean. The preinjection conditioned response lowered response rate, as did the actual drug treatment. Visual observation revealed that the CS elicited locomotor activity that interfered with leverpressing, indicating that although the conditioned response rate change was “isodirectional” to the drug effect (unconditioned response), an opposite-direction conditioned locomotor conditioned response was elicited by preinjection stimuli. The ability of the injection procedure to elicit conditioned responses was determined after 12 conditioning days in an extinction-test session in which water only was injected in both groups. Neither significant conditioned suppression nor conditioned motor activity was elicited by the injection procedure. Conditioned Stimulus (dpeaa)DE-He213 Unconditioned Stimulus (dpeaa)DE-He213 Conditioned Response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Conditioned Suppression (dpeaa)DE-He213 Unconditioned Response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enthalten in Physiological Psychology Springer-Verlag, 1973 25(1997), 2 vom: Juni, Seite 146-151 (DE-627)SPR037003089 nnns volume:25 year:1997 number:2 month:06 pages:146-151 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03331920 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA AR 25 1997 2 06 146-151 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.3758/BF03331920 doi (DE-627)SPR037020641 (SPR)BF03331920-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Duncan, Perry M. verfasserin aut Conditioned suppression of operant responding in response to a stimulus paired with pentobarbital injections 1997 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1997 Abstract Conditioned suppression of ongoing behavior in response to a stimulus paired with barbiturate treatment was investigated in rats leverpressing for food pellets by presenting an audiovisual stimulus (conditioned stimulus [CS]) 3 min before injection of 15 mg/kg sodium pentobarbital (experimental group, n = 9) or water (control group, n = 8). The experimental rats completely stopped responding during the 20-min postinjection period. During 12 conditioning days, the experimental group developed conditioned suppression to the preinjection CS as indicated by decreases in response rate to 35% of baseline, significantly different from the 70% control group mean. The preinjection conditioned response lowered response rate, as did the actual drug treatment. Visual observation revealed that the CS elicited locomotor activity that interfered with leverpressing, indicating that although the conditioned response rate change was “isodirectional” to the drug effect (unconditioned response), an opposite-direction conditioned locomotor conditioned response was elicited by preinjection stimuli. The ability of the injection procedure to elicit conditioned responses was determined after 12 conditioning days in an extinction-test session in which water only was injected in both groups. Neither significant conditioned suppression nor conditioned motor activity was elicited by the injection procedure. Conditioned Stimulus (dpeaa)DE-He213 Unconditioned Stimulus (dpeaa)DE-He213 Conditioned Response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Conditioned Suppression (dpeaa)DE-He213 Unconditioned Response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enthalten in Physiological Psychology Springer-Verlag, 1973 25(1997), 2 vom: Juni, Seite 146-151 (DE-627)SPR037003089 nnns volume:25 year:1997 number:2 month:06 pages:146-151 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03331920 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA AR 25 1997 2 06 146-151 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.3758/BF03331920 doi (DE-627)SPR037020641 (SPR)BF03331920-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Duncan, Perry M. verfasserin aut Conditioned suppression of operant responding in response to a stimulus paired with pentobarbital injections 1997 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1997 Abstract Conditioned suppression of ongoing behavior in response to a stimulus paired with barbiturate treatment was investigated in rats leverpressing for food pellets by presenting an audiovisual stimulus (conditioned stimulus [CS]) 3 min before injection of 15 mg/kg sodium pentobarbital (experimental group, n = 9) or water (control group, n = 8). The experimental rats completely stopped responding during the 20-min postinjection period. During 12 conditioning days, the experimental group developed conditioned suppression to the preinjection CS as indicated by decreases in response rate to 35% of baseline, significantly different from the 70% control group mean. The preinjection conditioned response lowered response rate, as did the actual drug treatment. Visual observation revealed that the CS elicited locomotor activity that interfered with leverpressing, indicating that although the conditioned response rate change was “isodirectional” to the drug effect (unconditioned response), an opposite-direction conditioned locomotor conditioned response was elicited by preinjection stimuli. The ability of the injection procedure to elicit conditioned responses was determined after 12 conditioning days in an extinction-test session in which water only was injected in both groups. Neither significant conditioned suppression nor conditioned motor activity was elicited by the injection procedure. Conditioned Stimulus (dpeaa)DE-He213 Unconditioned Stimulus (dpeaa)DE-He213 Conditioned Response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Conditioned Suppression (dpeaa)DE-He213 Unconditioned Response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enthalten in Physiological Psychology Springer-Verlag, 1973 25(1997), 2 vom: Juni, Seite 146-151 (DE-627)SPR037003089 nnns volume:25 year:1997 number:2 month:06 pages:146-151 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03331920 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA AR 25 1997 2 06 146-151 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.3758/BF03331920 doi (DE-627)SPR037020641 (SPR)BF03331920-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Duncan, Perry M. verfasserin aut Conditioned suppression of operant responding in response to a stimulus paired with pentobarbital injections 1997 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1997 Abstract Conditioned suppression of ongoing behavior in response to a stimulus paired with barbiturate treatment was investigated in rats leverpressing for food pellets by presenting an audiovisual stimulus (conditioned stimulus [CS]) 3 min before injection of 15 mg/kg sodium pentobarbital (experimental group, n = 9) or water (control group, n = 8). The experimental rats completely stopped responding during the 20-min postinjection period. During 12 conditioning days, the experimental group developed conditioned suppression to the preinjection CS as indicated by decreases in response rate to 35% of baseline, significantly different from the 70% control group mean. The preinjection conditioned response lowered response rate, as did the actual drug treatment. Visual observation revealed that the CS elicited locomotor activity that interfered with leverpressing, indicating that although the conditioned response rate change was “isodirectional” to the drug effect (unconditioned response), an opposite-direction conditioned locomotor conditioned response was elicited by preinjection stimuli. The ability of the injection procedure to elicit conditioned responses was determined after 12 conditioning days in an extinction-test session in which water only was injected in both groups. Neither significant conditioned suppression nor conditioned motor activity was elicited by the injection procedure. Conditioned Stimulus (dpeaa)DE-He213 Unconditioned Stimulus (dpeaa)DE-He213 Conditioned Response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Conditioned Suppression (dpeaa)DE-He213 Unconditioned Response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enthalten in Physiological Psychology Springer-Verlag, 1973 25(1997), 2 vom: Juni, Seite 146-151 (DE-627)SPR037003089 nnns volume:25 year:1997 number:2 month:06 pages:146-151 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03331920 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA AR 25 1997 2 06 146-151 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Physiological Psychology 25(1997), 2 vom: Juni, Seite 146-151 volume:25 year:1997 number:2 month:06 pages:146-151 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Physiological Psychology 25(1997), 2 vom: Juni, Seite 146-151 volume:25 year:1997 number:2 month:06 pages:146-151 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Conditioned Stimulus Unconditioned Stimulus Conditioned Response Conditioned Suppression Unconditioned Response |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Physiological Psychology |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Duncan, Perry M. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
1997-06-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
SPR037003089 |
| id |
SPR037020641 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR037020641</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519132035.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s1997 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3758/BF03331920</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR037020641</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)BF03331920-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Duncan, Perry M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Conditioned suppression of operant responding in response to a stimulus paired with pentobarbital injections</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1997</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1997</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Conditioned suppression of ongoing behavior in response to a stimulus paired with barbiturate treatment was investigated in rats leverpressing for food pellets by presenting an audiovisual stimulus (conditioned stimulus [CS]) 3 min before injection of 15 mg/kg sodium pentobarbital (experimental group, n = 9) or water (control group, n = 8). The experimental rats completely stopped responding during the 20-min postinjection period. During 12 conditioning days, the experimental group developed conditioned suppression to the preinjection CS as indicated by decreases in response rate to 35% of baseline, significantly different from the 70% control group mean. The preinjection conditioned response lowered response rate, as did the actual drug treatment. Visual observation revealed that the CS elicited locomotor activity that interfered with leverpressing, indicating that although the conditioned response rate change was “isodirectional” to the drug effect (unconditioned response), an opposite-direction conditioned locomotor conditioned response was elicited by preinjection stimuli. The ability of the injection procedure to elicit conditioned responses was determined after 12 conditioning days in an extinction-test session in which water only was injected in both groups. Neither significant conditioned suppression nor conditioned motor activity was elicited by the injection procedure.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conditioned Stimulus</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Unconditioned Stimulus</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conditioned Response</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conditioned Suppression</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Unconditioned Response</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Physiological Psychology</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1973</subfield><subfield code="g">25(1997), 2 vom: Juni, Seite 146-151</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR037003089</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:25</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1997</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">month:06</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:146-151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03331920</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">25</subfield><subfield code="j">1997</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="c">06</subfield><subfield code="h">146-151</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Duncan, Perry M. |
| spellingShingle |
Duncan, Perry M. misc Conditioned Stimulus misc Unconditioned Stimulus misc Conditioned Response misc Conditioned Suppression misc Unconditioned Response Conditioned suppression of operant responding in response to a stimulus paired with pentobarbital injections |
| authorStr |
Duncan, Perry M. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)SPR037003089 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
Conditioned suppression of operant responding in response to a stimulus paired with pentobarbital injections Conditioned Stimulus (dpeaa)DE-He213 Unconditioned Stimulus (dpeaa)DE-He213 Conditioned Response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Conditioned Suppression (dpeaa)DE-He213 Unconditioned Response (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
misc Conditioned Stimulus misc Unconditioned Stimulus misc Conditioned Response misc Conditioned Suppression misc Unconditioned Response |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Conditioned Stimulus misc Unconditioned Stimulus misc Conditioned Response misc Conditioned Suppression misc Unconditioned Response |
| topic_browse |
misc Conditioned Stimulus misc Unconditioned Stimulus misc Conditioned Response misc Conditioned Suppression misc Unconditioned Response |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Physiological Psychology |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
SPR037003089 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Physiological Psychology |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)SPR037003089 |
| title |
Conditioned suppression of operant responding in response to a stimulus paired with pentobarbital injections |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR037020641 (SPR)BF03331920-e |
| title_full |
Conditioned suppression of operant responding in response to a stimulus paired with pentobarbital injections |
| author_sort |
Duncan, Perry M. |
| journal |
Physiological Psychology |
| journalStr |
Physiological Psychology |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
1997 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
146 |
| author_browse |
Duncan, Perry M. |
| container_volume |
25 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Duncan, Perry M. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.3758/BF03331920 |
| title_sort |
conditioned suppression of operant responding in response to a stimulus paired with pentobarbital injections |
| title_auth |
Conditioned suppression of operant responding in response to a stimulus paired with pentobarbital injections |
| abstract |
Abstract Conditioned suppression of ongoing behavior in response to a stimulus paired with barbiturate treatment was investigated in rats leverpressing for food pellets by presenting an audiovisual stimulus (conditioned stimulus [CS]) 3 min before injection of 15 mg/kg sodium pentobarbital (experimental group, n = 9) or water (control group, n = 8). The experimental rats completely stopped responding during the 20-min postinjection period. During 12 conditioning days, the experimental group developed conditioned suppression to the preinjection CS as indicated by decreases in response rate to 35% of baseline, significantly different from the 70% control group mean. The preinjection conditioned response lowered response rate, as did the actual drug treatment. Visual observation revealed that the CS elicited locomotor activity that interfered with leverpressing, indicating that although the conditioned response rate change was “isodirectional” to the drug effect (unconditioned response), an opposite-direction conditioned locomotor conditioned response was elicited by preinjection stimuli. The ability of the injection procedure to elicit conditioned responses was determined after 12 conditioning days in an extinction-test session in which water only was injected in both groups. Neither significant conditioned suppression nor conditioned motor activity was elicited by the injection procedure. © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1997 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract Conditioned suppression of ongoing behavior in response to a stimulus paired with barbiturate treatment was investigated in rats leverpressing for food pellets by presenting an audiovisual stimulus (conditioned stimulus [CS]) 3 min before injection of 15 mg/kg sodium pentobarbital (experimental group, n = 9) or water (control group, n = 8). The experimental rats completely stopped responding during the 20-min postinjection period. During 12 conditioning days, the experimental group developed conditioned suppression to the preinjection CS as indicated by decreases in response rate to 35% of baseline, significantly different from the 70% control group mean. The preinjection conditioned response lowered response rate, as did the actual drug treatment. Visual observation revealed that the CS elicited locomotor activity that interfered with leverpressing, indicating that although the conditioned response rate change was “isodirectional” to the drug effect (unconditioned response), an opposite-direction conditioned locomotor conditioned response was elicited by preinjection stimuli. The ability of the injection procedure to elicit conditioned responses was determined after 12 conditioning days in an extinction-test session in which water only was injected in both groups. Neither significant conditioned suppression nor conditioned motor activity was elicited by the injection procedure. © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1997 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Conditioned suppression of ongoing behavior in response to a stimulus paired with barbiturate treatment was investigated in rats leverpressing for food pellets by presenting an audiovisual stimulus (conditioned stimulus [CS]) 3 min before injection of 15 mg/kg sodium pentobarbital (experimental group, n = 9) or water (control group, n = 8). The experimental rats completely stopped responding during the 20-min postinjection period. During 12 conditioning days, the experimental group developed conditioned suppression to the preinjection CS as indicated by decreases in response rate to 35% of baseline, significantly different from the 70% control group mean. The preinjection conditioned response lowered response rate, as did the actual drug treatment. Visual observation revealed that the CS elicited locomotor activity that interfered with leverpressing, indicating that although the conditioned response rate change was “isodirectional” to the drug effect (unconditioned response), an opposite-direction conditioned locomotor conditioned response was elicited by preinjection stimuli. The ability of the injection procedure to elicit conditioned responses was determined after 12 conditioning days in an extinction-test session in which water only was injected in both groups. Neither significant conditioned suppression nor conditioned motor activity was elicited by the injection procedure. © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1997 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
Conditioned suppression of operant responding in response to a stimulus paired with pentobarbital injections |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03331920 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
SPR037003089 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.3758/BF03331920 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T20:47:25.745Z |
| _version_ |
1803592291580903424 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR037020641</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519132035.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s1997 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3758/BF03331920</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR037020641</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)BF03331920-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Duncan, Perry M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Conditioned suppression of operant responding in response to a stimulus paired with pentobarbital injections</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1997</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1997</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Conditioned suppression of ongoing behavior in response to a stimulus paired with barbiturate treatment was investigated in rats leverpressing for food pellets by presenting an audiovisual stimulus (conditioned stimulus [CS]) 3 min before injection of 15 mg/kg sodium pentobarbital (experimental group, n = 9) or water (control group, n = 8). The experimental rats completely stopped responding during the 20-min postinjection period. During 12 conditioning days, the experimental group developed conditioned suppression to the preinjection CS as indicated by decreases in response rate to 35% of baseline, significantly different from the 70% control group mean. The preinjection conditioned response lowered response rate, as did the actual drug treatment. Visual observation revealed that the CS elicited locomotor activity that interfered with leverpressing, indicating that although the conditioned response rate change was “isodirectional” to the drug effect (unconditioned response), an opposite-direction conditioned locomotor conditioned response was elicited by preinjection stimuli. The ability of the injection procedure to elicit conditioned responses was determined after 12 conditioning days in an extinction-test session in which water only was injected in both groups. Neither significant conditioned suppression nor conditioned motor activity was elicited by the injection procedure.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conditioned Stimulus</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Unconditioned Stimulus</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conditioned Response</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conditioned Suppression</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Unconditioned Response</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Physiological Psychology</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1973</subfield><subfield code="g">25(1997), 2 vom: Juni, Seite 146-151</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR037003089</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:25</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1997</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">month:06</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:146-151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03331920</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">25</subfield><subfield code="j">1997</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="c">06</subfield><subfield code="h">146-151</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.398695 |