The relative difficulty of a subject-generated rule in an attribute identification task
Abstract Comparisons of attribute identification difficulty were made among a S-generated conceptual rule (double conjunction) and two commonly studied conceptual rules (biconditional and exlusive disjunction). The three rules described identical subsets of stimuli. The double conjunction was the ea...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Gottwald, Richard L. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
1974 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1974 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society - Springer-Verlag, 1973, 3(1974), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 21-22 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:3 ; year:1974 ; number:1 ; month:01 ; pages:21-22 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.3758/BF03333378 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR037026186 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR037026186 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230328181543.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201007s1974 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3758/BF03333378 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR037026186 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)BF03333378-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Gottwald, Richard L. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The relative difficulty of a subject-generated rule in an attribute identification task |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1974 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1974 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Comparisons of attribute identification difficulty were made among a S-generated conceptual rule (double conjunction) and two commonly studied conceptual rules (biconditional and exlusive disjunction). The three rules described identical subsets of stimuli. The double conjunction was the easiest. The other two rules did not differ in difficulty. There were also effects due to practice and the salience of the relevant attributes, but there were no significant interactions among the three variables (rule, practice, attribute salience). | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Body Shape |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Relevant Attribute |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Attribute Identification |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Spot Color |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Attribute Salience |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Swaine, Michael R. |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |d Springer-Verlag, 1973 |g 3(1974), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 21-22 |w (DE-627)SPR037022717 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:3 |g year:1974 |g number:1 |g month:01 |g pages:21-22 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03333378 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 3 |j 1974 |e 1 |c 01 |h 21-22 | ||
| author_variant |
r l g rl rlg m r s mr mrs |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
gottwaldrichardlswainemichaelr:1974----:hrltvdfiutoaujcgnrtduenntrb |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
1974 |
| publishDate |
1974 |
| allfields |
10.3758/BF03333378 doi (DE-627)SPR037026186 (SPR)BF03333378-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Gottwald, Richard L. verfasserin aut The relative difficulty of a subject-generated rule in an attribute identification task 1974 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1974 Abstract Comparisons of attribute identification difficulty were made among a S-generated conceptual rule (double conjunction) and two commonly studied conceptual rules (biconditional and exlusive disjunction). The three rules described identical subsets of stimuli. The double conjunction was the easiest. The other two rules did not differ in difficulty. There were also effects due to practice and the salience of the relevant attributes, but there were no significant interactions among the three variables (rule, practice, attribute salience). Body Shape (dpeaa)DE-He213 Relevant Attribute (dpeaa)DE-He213 Attribute Identification (dpeaa)DE-He213 Spot Color (dpeaa)DE-He213 Attribute Salience (dpeaa)DE-He213 Swaine, Michael R. aut Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 3(1974), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 21-22 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:3 year:1974 number:1 month:01 pages:21-22 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03333378 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 3 1974 1 01 21-22 |
| spelling |
10.3758/BF03333378 doi (DE-627)SPR037026186 (SPR)BF03333378-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Gottwald, Richard L. verfasserin aut The relative difficulty of a subject-generated rule in an attribute identification task 1974 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1974 Abstract Comparisons of attribute identification difficulty were made among a S-generated conceptual rule (double conjunction) and two commonly studied conceptual rules (biconditional and exlusive disjunction). The three rules described identical subsets of stimuli. The double conjunction was the easiest. The other two rules did not differ in difficulty. There were also effects due to practice and the salience of the relevant attributes, but there were no significant interactions among the three variables (rule, practice, attribute salience). Body Shape (dpeaa)DE-He213 Relevant Attribute (dpeaa)DE-He213 Attribute Identification (dpeaa)DE-He213 Spot Color (dpeaa)DE-He213 Attribute Salience (dpeaa)DE-He213 Swaine, Michael R. aut Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 3(1974), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 21-22 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:3 year:1974 number:1 month:01 pages:21-22 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03333378 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 3 1974 1 01 21-22 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.3758/BF03333378 doi (DE-627)SPR037026186 (SPR)BF03333378-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Gottwald, Richard L. verfasserin aut The relative difficulty of a subject-generated rule in an attribute identification task 1974 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1974 Abstract Comparisons of attribute identification difficulty were made among a S-generated conceptual rule (double conjunction) and two commonly studied conceptual rules (biconditional and exlusive disjunction). The three rules described identical subsets of stimuli. The double conjunction was the easiest. The other two rules did not differ in difficulty. There were also effects due to practice and the salience of the relevant attributes, but there were no significant interactions among the three variables (rule, practice, attribute salience). Body Shape (dpeaa)DE-He213 Relevant Attribute (dpeaa)DE-He213 Attribute Identification (dpeaa)DE-He213 Spot Color (dpeaa)DE-He213 Attribute Salience (dpeaa)DE-He213 Swaine, Michael R. aut Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 3(1974), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 21-22 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:3 year:1974 number:1 month:01 pages:21-22 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03333378 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 3 1974 1 01 21-22 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.3758/BF03333378 doi (DE-627)SPR037026186 (SPR)BF03333378-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Gottwald, Richard L. verfasserin aut The relative difficulty of a subject-generated rule in an attribute identification task 1974 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1974 Abstract Comparisons of attribute identification difficulty were made among a S-generated conceptual rule (double conjunction) and two commonly studied conceptual rules (biconditional and exlusive disjunction). The three rules described identical subsets of stimuli. The double conjunction was the easiest. The other two rules did not differ in difficulty. There were also effects due to practice and the salience of the relevant attributes, but there were no significant interactions among the three variables (rule, practice, attribute salience). Body Shape (dpeaa)DE-He213 Relevant Attribute (dpeaa)DE-He213 Attribute Identification (dpeaa)DE-He213 Spot Color (dpeaa)DE-He213 Attribute Salience (dpeaa)DE-He213 Swaine, Michael R. aut Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 3(1974), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 21-22 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:3 year:1974 number:1 month:01 pages:21-22 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03333378 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 3 1974 1 01 21-22 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.3758/BF03333378 doi (DE-627)SPR037026186 (SPR)BF03333378-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Gottwald, Richard L. verfasserin aut The relative difficulty of a subject-generated rule in an attribute identification task 1974 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1974 Abstract Comparisons of attribute identification difficulty were made among a S-generated conceptual rule (double conjunction) and two commonly studied conceptual rules (biconditional and exlusive disjunction). The three rules described identical subsets of stimuli. The double conjunction was the easiest. The other two rules did not differ in difficulty. There were also effects due to practice and the salience of the relevant attributes, but there were no significant interactions among the three variables (rule, practice, attribute salience). Body Shape (dpeaa)DE-He213 Relevant Attribute (dpeaa)DE-He213 Attribute Identification (dpeaa)DE-He213 Spot Color (dpeaa)DE-He213 Attribute Salience (dpeaa)DE-He213 Swaine, Michael R. aut Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 3(1974), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 21-22 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:3 year:1974 number:1 month:01 pages:21-22 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03333378 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 3 1974 1 01 21-22 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 3(1974), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 21-22 volume:3 year:1974 number:1 month:01 pages:21-22 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 3(1974), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 21-22 volume:3 year:1974 number:1 month:01 pages:21-22 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Body Shape Relevant Attribute Attribute Identification Spot Color Attribute Salience |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Gottwald, Richard L. @@aut@@ Swaine, Michael R. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
1974-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
SPR037022717 |
| id |
SPR037026186 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR037026186</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230328181543.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s1974 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3758/BF03333378</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR037026186</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)BF03333378-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gottwald, Richard L.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The relative difficulty of a subject-generated rule in an attribute identification task</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1974</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1974</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Comparisons of attribute identification difficulty were made among a S-generated conceptual rule (double conjunction) and two commonly studied conceptual rules (biconditional and exlusive disjunction). The three rules described identical subsets of stimuli. The double conjunction was the easiest. The other two rules did not differ in difficulty. There were also effects due to practice and the salience of the relevant attributes, but there were no significant interactions among the three variables (rule, practice, attribute salience).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Body Shape</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Relevant Attribute</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Attribute Identification</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Spot Color</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Attribute Salience</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Swaine, Michael R.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1973</subfield><subfield code="g">3(1974), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 21-22</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR037022717</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:3</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1974</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:21-22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03333378</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">3</subfield><subfield code="j">1974</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield><subfield code="h">21-22</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Gottwald, Richard L. |
| spellingShingle |
Gottwald, Richard L. misc Body Shape misc Relevant Attribute misc Attribute Identification misc Spot Color misc Attribute Salience The relative difficulty of a subject-generated rule in an attribute identification task |
| authorStr |
Gottwald, Richard L. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)SPR037022717 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
The relative difficulty of a subject-generated rule in an attribute identification task Body Shape (dpeaa)DE-He213 Relevant Attribute (dpeaa)DE-He213 Attribute Identification (dpeaa)DE-He213 Spot Color (dpeaa)DE-He213 Attribute Salience (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
misc Body Shape misc Relevant Attribute misc Attribute Identification misc Spot Color misc Attribute Salience |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Body Shape misc Relevant Attribute misc Attribute Identification misc Spot Color misc Attribute Salience |
| topic_browse |
misc Body Shape misc Relevant Attribute misc Attribute Identification misc Spot Color misc Attribute Salience |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
SPR037022717 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)SPR037022717 |
| title |
The relative difficulty of a subject-generated rule in an attribute identification task |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR037026186 (SPR)BF03333378-e |
| title_full |
The relative difficulty of a subject-generated rule in an attribute identification task |
| author_sort |
Gottwald, Richard L. |
| journal |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
| journalStr |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
1974 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
21 |
| author_browse |
Gottwald, Richard L. Swaine, Michael R. |
| container_volume |
3 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Gottwald, Richard L. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.3758/BF03333378 |
| title_sort |
relative difficulty of a subject-generated rule in an attribute identification task |
| title_auth |
The relative difficulty of a subject-generated rule in an attribute identification task |
| abstract |
Abstract Comparisons of attribute identification difficulty were made among a S-generated conceptual rule (double conjunction) and two commonly studied conceptual rules (biconditional and exlusive disjunction). The three rules described identical subsets of stimuli. The double conjunction was the easiest. The other two rules did not differ in difficulty. There were also effects due to practice and the salience of the relevant attributes, but there were no significant interactions among the three variables (rule, practice, attribute salience). © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1974 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract Comparisons of attribute identification difficulty were made among a S-generated conceptual rule (double conjunction) and two commonly studied conceptual rules (biconditional and exlusive disjunction). The three rules described identical subsets of stimuli. The double conjunction was the easiest. The other two rules did not differ in difficulty. There were also effects due to practice and the salience of the relevant attributes, but there were no significant interactions among the three variables (rule, practice, attribute salience). © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1974 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Comparisons of attribute identification difficulty were made among a S-generated conceptual rule (double conjunction) and two commonly studied conceptual rules (biconditional and exlusive disjunction). The three rules described identical subsets of stimuli. The double conjunction was the easiest. The other two rules did not differ in difficulty. There were also effects due to practice and the salience of the relevant attributes, but there were no significant interactions among the three variables (rule, practice, attribute salience). © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1974 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
The relative difficulty of a subject-generated rule in an attribute identification task |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03333378 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Swaine, Michael R. |
| author2Str |
Swaine, Michael R. |
| ppnlink |
SPR037022717 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.3758/BF03333378 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T20:48:40.750Z |
| _version_ |
1803592370230394881 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR037026186</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230328181543.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s1974 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3758/BF03333378</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR037026186</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)BF03333378-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gottwald, Richard L.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The relative difficulty of a subject-generated rule in an attribute identification task</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1974</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1974</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Comparisons of attribute identification difficulty were made among a S-generated conceptual rule (double conjunction) and two commonly studied conceptual rules (biconditional and exlusive disjunction). The three rules described identical subsets of stimuli. The double conjunction was the easiest. The other two rules did not differ in difficulty. There were also effects due to practice and the salience of the relevant attributes, but there were no significant interactions among the three variables (rule, practice, attribute salience).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Body Shape</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Relevant Attribute</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Attribute Identification</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Spot Color</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Attribute Salience</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Swaine, Michael R.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1973</subfield><subfield code="g">3(1974), 1 vom: Jan., Seite 21-22</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR037022717</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:3</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1974</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:21-22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03333378</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">3</subfield><subfield code="j">1974</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield><subfield code="h">21-22</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4016542 |