Human preferences for time-dependent and response-dependent reinforcement schedules
Abstract Human preferences for various fixed-ratio schedules were compared with a fixed-interval 30-sec schedule in 56 male and female subjects. Using counter points as reinforcers and a preference paradigm permitting interspecies comparisons, three experiments yielded data suggesting that schedule...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Schaeffer, Robert W. [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
1979 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Anmerkung: |
© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1979 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society - Springer-Verlag, 1973, 14(1979), 4 vom: Okt., Seite 293-296 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:14 ; year:1979 ; number:4 ; month:10 ; pages:293-296 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.3758/BF03329459 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
SPR037045571 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | SPR037045571 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230328181653.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 201007s1979 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3758/BF03329459 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)SPR037045571 | ||
035 | |a (SPR)BF03329459-e | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Schaeffer, Robert W. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Human preferences for time-dependent and response-dependent reinforcement schedules |
264 | 1 | |c 1979 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1979 | ||
520 | |a Abstract Human preferences for various fixed-ratio schedules were compared with a fixed-interval 30-sec schedule in 56 male and female subjects. Using counter points as reinforcers and a preference paradigm permitting interspecies comparisons, three experiments yielded data suggesting that schedule preferences reflect sensitivities to time-dependent and responsedependent variables, rate of reinforcement parameters, and the total number of responses emitted by the organism, in that order of importance. The importance of this technology for tests of Premack’s reinforcement principle and ascertainment of the positive or negative valence of reinforcement schedules is briefly discussed. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Reinforcement Schedule |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Reinforcement Rate |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Schedule Preference |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Reinforcement Delivery |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Choice Period |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |d Springer-Verlag, 1973 |g 14(1979), 4 vom: Okt., Seite 293-296 |w (DE-627)SPR037022717 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:14 |g year:1979 |g number:4 |g month:10 |g pages:293-296 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03329459 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 14 |j 1979 |e 4 |c 10 |h 293-296 |
author_variant |
r w s rw rws |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
schaefferrobertw:1979----:uapeeecsotmdpnetnrsosdpnete |
hierarchy_sort_str |
1979 |
publishDate |
1979 |
allfields |
10.3758/BF03329459 doi (DE-627)SPR037045571 (SPR)BF03329459-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Schaeffer, Robert W. verfasserin aut Human preferences for time-dependent and response-dependent reinforcement schedules 1979 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1979 Abstract Human preferences for various fixed-ratio schedules were compared with a fixed-interval 30-sec schedule in 56 male and female subjects. Using counter points as reinforcers and a preference paradigm permitting interspecies comparisons, three experiments yielded data suggesting that schedule preferences reflect sensitivities to time-dependent and responsedependent variables, rate of reinforcement parameters, and the total number of responses emitted by the organism, in that order of importance. The importance of this technology for tests of Premack’s reinforcement principle and ascertainment of the positive or negative valence of reinforcement schedules is briefly discussed. Reinforcement Schedule (dpeaa)DE-He213 Reinforcement Rate (dpeaa)DE-He213 Schedule Preference (dpeaa)DE-He213 Reinforcement Delivery (dpeaa)DE-He213 Choice Period (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 14(1979), 4 vom: Okt., Seite 293-296 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:14 year:1979 number:4 month:10 pages:293-296 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03329459 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 14 1979 4 10 293-296 |
spelling |
10.3758/BF03329459 doi (DE-627)SPR037045571 (SPR)BF03329459-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Schaeffer, Robert W. verfasserin aut Human preferences for time-dependent and response-dependent reinforcement schedules 1979 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1979 Abstract Human preferences for various fixed-ratio schedules were compared with a fixed-interval 30-sec schedule in 56 male and female subjects. Using counter points as reinforcers and a preference paradigm permitting interspecies comparisons, three experiments yielded data suggesting that schedule preferences reflect sensitivities to time-dependent and responsedependent variables, rate of reinforcement parameters, and the total number of responses emitted by the organism, in that order of importance. The importance of this technology for tests of Premack’s reinforcement principle and ascertainment of the positive or negative valence of reinforcement schedules is briefly discussed. Reinforcement Schedule (dpeaa)DE-He213 Reinforcement Rate (dpeaa)DE-He213 Schedule Preference (dpeaa)DE-He213 Reinforcement Delivery (dpeaa)DE-He213 Choice Period (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 14(1979), 4 vom: Okt., Seite 293-296 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:14 year:1979 number:4 month:10 pages:293-296 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03329459 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 14 1979 4 10 293-296 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.3758/BF03329459 doi (DE-627)SPR037045571 (SPR)BF03329459-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Schaeffer, Robert W. verfasserin aut Human preferences for time-dependent and response-dependent reinforcement schedules 1979 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1979 Abstract Human preferences for various fixed-ratio schedules were compared with a fixed-interval 30-sec schedule in 56 male and female subjects. Using counter points as reinforcers and a preference paradigm permitting interspecies comparisons, three experiments yielded data suggesting that schedule preferences reflect sensitivities to time-dependent and responsedependent variables, rate of reinforcement parameters, and the total number of responses emitted by the organism, in that order of importance. The importance of this technology for tests of Premack’s reinforcement principle and ascertainment of the positive or negative valence of reinforcement schedules is briefly discussed. Reinforcement Schedule (dpeaa)DE-He213 Reinforcement Rate (dpeaa)DE-He213 Schedule Preference (dpeaa)DE-He213 Reinforcement Delivery (dpeaa)DE-He213 Choice Period (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 14(1979), 4 vom: Okt., Seite 293-296 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:14 year:1979 number:4 month:10 pages:293-296 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03329459 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 14 1979 4 10 293-296 |
allfieldsGer |
10.3758/BF03329459 doi (DE-627)SPR037045571 (SPR)BF03329459-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Schaeffer, Robert W. verfasserin aut Human preferences for time-dependent and response-dependent reinforcement schedules 1979 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1979 Abstract Human preferences for various fixed-ratio schedules were compared with a fixed-interval 30-sec schedule in 56 male and female subjects. Using counter points as reinforcers and a preference paradigm permitting interspecies comparisons, three experiments yielded data suggesting that schedule preferences reflect sensitivities to time-dependent and responsedependent variables, rate of reinforcement parameters, and the total number of responses emitted by the organism, in that order of importance. The importance of this technology for tests of Premack’s reinforcement principle and ascertainment of the positive or negative valence of reinforcement schedules is briefly discussed. Reinforcement Schedule (dpeaa)DE-He213 Reinforcement Rate (dpeaa)DE-He213 Schedule Preference (dpeaa)DE-He213 Reinforcement Delivery (dpeaa)DE-He213 Choice Period (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 14(1979), 4 vom: Okt., Seite 293-296 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:14 year:1979 number:4 month:10 pages:293-296 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03329459 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 14 1979 4 10 293-296 |
allfieldsSound |
10.3758/BF03329459 doi (DE-627)SPR037045571 (SPR)BF03329459-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Schaeffer, Robert W. verfasserin aut Human preferences for time-dependent and response-dependent reinforcement schedules 1979 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1979 Abstract Human preferences for various fixed-ratio schedules were compared with a fixed-interval 30-sec schedule in 56 male and female subjects. Using counter points as reinforcers and a preference paradigm permitting interspecies comparisons, three experiments yielded data suggesting that schedule preferences reflect sensitivities to time-dependent and responsedependent variables, rate of reinforcement parameters, and the total number of responses emitted by the organism, in that order of importance. The importance of this technology for tests of Premack’s reinforcement principle and ascertainment of the positive or negative valence of reinforcement schedules is briefly discussed. Reinforcement Schedule (dpeaa)DE-He213 Reinforcement Rate (dpeaa)DE-He213 Schedule Preference (dpeaa)DE-He213 Reinforcement Delivery (dpeaa)DE-He213 Choice Period (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 14(1979), 4 vom: Okt., Seite 293-296 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:14 year:1979 number:4 month:10 pages:293-296 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03329459 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 14 1979 4 10 293-296 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 14(1979), 4 vom: Okt., Seite 293-296 volume:14 year:1979 number:4 month:10 pages:293-296 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 14(1979), 4 vom: Okt., Seite 293-296 volume:14 year:1979 number:4 month:10 pages:293-296 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Reinforcement Schedule Reinforcement Rate Schedule Preference Reinforcement Delivery Choice Period |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Schaeffer, Robert W. @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
1979-10-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
SPR037022717 |
id |
SPR037045571 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR037045571</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230328181653.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s1979 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3758/BF03329459</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR037045571</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)BF03329459-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schaeffer, Robert W.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Human preferences for time-dependent and response-dependent reinforcement schedules</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1979</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1979</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Human preferences for various fixed-ratio schedules were compared with a fixed-interval 30-sec schedule in 56 male and female subjects. Using counter points as reinforcers and a preference paradigm permitting interspecies comparisons, three experiments yielded data suggesting that schedule preferences reflect sensitivities to time-dependent and responsedependent variables, rate of reinforcement parameters, and the total number of responses emitted by the organism, in that order of importance. The importance of this technology for tests of Premack’s reinforcement principle and ascertainment of the positive or negative valence of reinforcement schedules is briefly discussed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Reinforcement Schedule</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Reinforcement Rate</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Schedule Preference</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Reinforcement Delivery</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Choice Period</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1973</subfield><subfield code="g">14(1979), 4 vom: Okt., Seite 293-296</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR037022717</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:14</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1979</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:293-296</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03329459</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">14</subfield><subfield code="j">1979</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="c">10</subfield><subfield code="h">293-296</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Schaeffer, Robert W. |
spellingShingle |
Schaeffer, Robert W. misc Reinforcement Schedule misc Reinforcement Rate misc Schedule Preference misc Reinforcement Delivery misc Choice Period Human preferences for time-dependent and response-dependent reinforcement schedules |
authorStr |
Schaeffer, Robert W. |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)SPR037022717 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
springer |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
topic_title |
Human preferences for time-dependent and response-dependent reinforcement schedules Reinforcement Schedule (dpeaa)DE-He213 Reinforcement Rate (dpeaa)DE-He213 Schedule Preference (dpeaa)DE-He213 Reinforcement Delivery (dpeaa)DE-He213 Choice Period (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
topic |
misc Reinforcement Schedule misc Reinforcement Rate misc Schedule Preference misc Reinforcement Delivery misc Choice Period |
topic_unstemmed |
misc Reinforcement Schedule misc Reinforcement Rate misc Schedule Preference misc Reinforcement Delivery misc Choice Period |
topic_browse |
misc Reinforcement Schedule misc Reinforcement Rate misc Schedule Preference misc Reinforcement Delivery misc Choice Period |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
hierarchy_parent_id |
SPR037022717 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)SPR037022717 |
title |
Human preferences for time-dependent and response-dependent reinforcement schedules |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR037045571 (SPR)BF03329459-e |
title_full |
Human preferences for time-dependent and response-dependent reinforcement schedules |
author_sort |
Schaeffer, Robert W. |
journal |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
journalStr |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
1979 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
293 |
author_browse |
Schaeffer, Robert W. |
container_volume |
14 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Schaeffer, Robert W. |
doi_str_mv |
10.3758/BF03329459 |
title_sort |
human preferences for time-dependent and response-dependent reinforcement schedules |
title_auth |
Human preferences for time-dependent and response-dependent reinforcement schedules |
abstract |
Abstract Human preferences for various fixed-ratio schedules were compared with a fixed-interval 30-sec schedule in 56 male and female subjects. Using counter points as reinforcers and a preference paradigm permitting interspecies comparisons, three experiments yielded data suggesting that schedule preferences reflect sensitivities to time-dependent and responsedependent variables, rate of reinforcement parameters, and the total number of responses emitted by the organism, in that order of importance. The importance of this technology for tests of Premack’s reinforcement principle and ascertainment of the positive or negative valence of reinforcement schedules is briefly discussed. © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1979 |
abstractGer |
Abstract Human preferences for various fixed-ratio schedules were compared with a fixed-interval 30-sec schedule in 56 male and female subjects. Using counter points as reinforcers and a preference paradigm permitting interspecies comparisons, three experiments yielded data suggesting that schedule preferences reflect sensitivities to time-dependent and responsedependent variables, rate of reinforcement parameters, and the total number of responses emitted by the organism, in that order of importance. The importance of this technology for tests of Premack’s reinforcement principle and ascertainment of the positive or negative valence of reinforcement schedules is briefly discussed. © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1979 |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Human preferences for various fixed-ratio schedules were compared with a fixed-interval 30-sec schedule in 56 male and female subjects. Using counter points as reinforcers and a preference paradigm permitting interspecies comparisons, three experiments yielded data suggesting that schedule preferences reflect sensitivities to time-dependent and responsedependent variables, rate of reinforcement parameters, and the total number of responses emitted by the organism, in that order of importance. The importance of this technology for tests of Premack’s reinforcement principle and ascertainment of the positive or negative valence of reinforcement schedules is briefly discussed. © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1979 |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER |
container_issue |
4 |
title_short |
Human preferences for time-dependent and response-dependent reinforcement schedules |
url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03329459 |
remote_bool |
true |
ppnlink |
SPR037022717 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.3758/BF03329459 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T20:52:41.934Z |
_version_ |
1803592623127003136 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR037045571</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230328181653.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s1979 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3758/BF03329459</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR037045571</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)BF03329459-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schaeffer, Robert W.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Human preferences for time-dependent and response-dependent reinforcement schedules</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1979</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1979</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Human preferences for various fixed-ratio schedules were compared with a fixed-interval 30-sec schedule in 56 male and female subjects. Using counter points as reinforcers and a preference paradigm permitting interspecies comparisons, three experiments yielded data suggesting that schedule preferences reflect sensitivities to time-dependent and responsedependent variables, rate of reinforcement parameters, and the total number of responses emitted by the organism, in that order of importance. The importance of this technology for tests of Premack’s reinforcement principle and ascertainment of the positive or negative valence of reinforcement schedules is briefly discussed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Reinforcement Schedule</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Reinforcement Rate</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Schedule Preference</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Reinforcement Delivery</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Choice Period</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1973</subfield><subfield code="g">14(1979), 4 vom: Okt., Seite 293-296</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR037022717</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:14</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1979</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:293-296</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03329459</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">14</subfield><subfield code="j">1979</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="c">10</subfield><subfield code="h">293-296</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4002037 |