Linguistic integration during recognition testing
Abstract Current interpretations of linguistic integration assume that memory integration occurs before test sentences are presented. Using an integrated recognition paradigm like that of Bransford and Franks, subjects in one study were given acquisition sentences prior to testing. In a second study...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Kamil, Michael L. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
1980 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© The psychonomic soceity, inc. 1980 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society - Springer-Verlag, 1973, 16(1980), 5 vom: Nov., Seite 353-355 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:16 ; year:1980 ; number:5 ; month:11 ; pages:353-355 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.3758/BF03329563 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR037048783 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR037048783 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230328181704.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201007s1980 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3758/BF03329563 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR037048783 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)BF03329563-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kamil, Michael L. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Linguistic integration during recognition testing |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1980 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © The psychonomic soceity, inc. 1980 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Current interpretations of linguistic integration assume that memory integration occurs before test sentences are presented. Using an integrated recognition paradigm like that of Bransford and Franks, subjects in one study were given acquisition sentences prior to testing. In a second study, subjects did not receive the acquisition sentences. In both studies, the subjects were tested for ability to discriminate thematically incorrect sentences from thematically correct sentences under conditions of high or low sentence imagery. Subjects in both conditions were able to locate over half of the noncases when sentences were high in imagery value. This suggests that subjects might be able to comprehend and construct ideas during recognition testing. However, low-imagery sentences produced poorer ability to detect noncase sentences in both studies, suggesting that differences in processing of abstract and concrete sentences exist. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Confidence Rating |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Test Sentence |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Complete Idea |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Imagery Rating |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Acquisition Sentence |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Schultz, E. Eugene |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bernbach, Harley A. |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |d Springer-Verlag, 1973 |g 16(1980), 5 vom: Nov., Seite 353-355 |w (DE-627)SPR037022717 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:16 |g year:1980 |g number:5 |g month:11 |g pages:353-355 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03329563 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 16 |j 1980 |e 5 |c 11 |h 353-355 | ||
| author_variant |
m l k ml mlk e e s ee ees h a b ha hab |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
kamilmichaellschultzeeugenebernbachharle:1980----:igitcnertodrnrcg |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
1980 |
| publishDate |
1980 |
| allfields |
10.3758/BF03329563 doi (DE-627)SPR037048783 (SPR)BF03329563-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kamil, Michael L. verfasserin aut Linguistic integration during recognition testing 1980 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The psychonomic soceity, inc. 1980 Abstract Current interpretations of linguistic integration assume that memory integration occurs before test sentences are presented. Using an integrated recognition paradigm like that of Bransford and Franks, subjects in one study were given acquisition sentences prior to testing. In a second study, subjects did not receive the acquisition sentences. In both studies, the subjects were tested for ability to discriminate thematically incorrect sentences from thematically correct sentences under conditions of high or low sentence imagery. Subjects in both conditions were able to locate over half of the noncases when sentences were high in imagery value. This suggests that subjects might be able to comprehend and construct ideas during recognition testing. However, low-imagery sentences produced poorer ability to detect noncase sentences in both studies, suggesting that differences in processing of abstract and concrete sentences exist. Confidence Rating (dpeaa)DE-He213 Test Sentence (dpeaa)DE-He213 Complete Idea (dpeaa)DE-He213 Imagery Rating (dpeaa)DE-He213 Acquisition Sentence (dpeaa)DE-He213 Schultz, E. Eugene aut Bernbach, Harley A. aut Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 16(1980), 5 vom: Nov., Seite 353-355 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:16 year:1980 number:5 month:11 pages:353-355 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03329563 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 16 1980 5 11 353-355 |
| spelling |
10.3758/BF03329563 doi (DE-627)SPR037048783 (SPR)BF03329563-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kamil, Michael L. verfasserin aut Linguistic integration during recognition testing 1980 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The psychonomic soceity, inc. 1980 Abstract Current interpretations of linguistic integration assume that memory integration occurs before test sentences are presented. Using an integrated recognition paradigm like that of Bransford and Franks, subjects in one study were given acquisition sentences prior to testing. In a second study, subjects did not receive the acquisition sentences. In both studies, the subjects were tested for ability to discriminate thematically incorrect sentences from thematically correct sentences under conditions of high or low sentence imagery. Subjects in both conditions were able to locate over half of the noncases when sentences were high in imagery value. This suggests that subjects might be able to comprehend and construct ideas during recognition testing. However, low-imagery sentences produced poorer ability to detect noncase sentences in both studies, suggesting that differences in processing of abstract and concrete sentences exist. Confidence Rating (dpeaa)DE-He213 Test Sentence (dpeaa)DE-He213 Complete Idea (dpeaa)DE-He213 Imagery Rating (dpeaa)DE-He213 Acquisition Sentence (dpeaa)DE-He213 Schultz, E. Eugene aut Bernbach, Harley A. aut Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 16(1980), 5 vom: Nov., Seite 353-355 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:16 year:1980 number:5 month:11 pages:353-355 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03329563 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 16 1980 5 11 353-355 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.3758/BF03329563 doi (DE-627)SPR037048783 (SPR)BF03329563-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kamil, Michael L. verfasserin aut Linguistic integration during recognition testing 1980 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The psychonomic soceity, inc. 1980 Abstract Current interpretations of linguistic integration assume that memory integration occurs before test sentences are presented. Using an integrated recognition paradigm like that of Bransford and Franks, subjects in one study were given acquisition sentences prior to testing. In a second study, subjects did not receive the acquisition sentences. In both studies, the subjects were tested for ability to discriminate thematically incorrect sentences from thematically correct sentences under conditions of high or low sentence imagery. Subjects in both conditions were able to locate over half of the noncases when sentences were high in imagery value. This suggests that subjects might be able to comprehend and construct ideas during recognition testing. However, low-imagery sentences produced poorer ability to detect noncase sentences in both studies, suggesting that differences in processing of abstract and concrete sentences exist. Confidence Rating (dpeaa)DE-He213 Test Sentence (dpeaa)DE-He213 Complete Idea (dpeaa)DE-He213 Imagery Rating (dpeaa)DE-He213 Acquisition Sentence (dpeaa)DE-He213 Schultz, E. Eugene aut Bernbach, Harley A. aut Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 16(1980), 5 vom: Nov., Seite 353-355 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:16 year:1980 number:5 month:11 pages:353-355 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03329563 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 16 1980 5 11 353-355 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.3758/BF03329563 doi (DE-627)SPR037048783 (SPR)BF03329563-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kamil, Michael L. verfasserin aut Linguistic integration during recognition testing 1980 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The psychonomic soceity, inc. 1980 Abstract Current interpretations of linguistic integration assume that memory integration occurs before test sentences are presented. Using an integrated recognition paradigm like that of Bransford and Franks, subjects in one study were given acquisition sentences prior to testing. In a second study, subjects did not receive the acquisition sentences. In both studies, the subjects were tested for ability to discriminate thematically incorrect sentences from thematically correct sentences under conditions of high or low sentence imagery. Subjects in both conditions were able to locate over half of the noncases when sentences were high in imagery value. This suggests that subjects might be able to comprehend and construct ideas during recognition testing. However, low-imagery sentences produced poorer ability to detect noncase sentences in both studies, suggesting that differences in processing of abstract and concrete sentences exist. Confidence Rating (dpeaa)DE-He213 Test Sentence (dpeaa)DE-He213 Complete Idea (dpeaa)DE-He213 Imagery Rating (dpeaa)DE-He213 Acquisition Sentence (dpeaa)DE-He213 Schultz, E. Eugene aut Bernbach, Harley A. aut Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 16(1980), 5 vom: Nov., Seite 353-355 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:16 year:1980 number:5 month:11 pages:353-355 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03329563 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 16 1980 5 11 353-355 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.3758/BF03329563 doi (DE-627)SPR037048783 (SPR)BF03329563-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kamil, Michael L. verfasserin aut Linguistic integration during recognition testing 1980 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The psychonomic soceity, inc. 1980 Abstract Current interpretations of linguistic integration assume that memory integration occurs before test sentences are presented. Using an integrated recognition paradigm like that of Bransford and Franks, subjects in one study were given acquisition sentences prior to testing. In a second study, subjects did not receive the acquisition sentences. In both studies, the subjects were tested for ability to discriminate thematically incorrect sentences from thematically correct sentences under conditions of high or low sentence imagery. Subjects in both conditions were able to locate over half of the noncases when sentences were high in imagery value. This suggests that subjects might be able to comprehend and construct ideas during recognition testing. However, low-imagery sentences produced poorer ability to detect noncase sentences in both studies, suggesting that differences in processing of abstract and concrete sentences exist. Confidence Rating (dpeaa)DE-He213 Test Sentence (dpeaa)DE-He213 Complete Idea (dpeaa)DE-He213 Imagery Rating (dpeaa)DE-He213 Acquisition Sentence (dpeaa)DE-He213 Schultz, E. Eugene aut Bernbach, Harley A. aut Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 16(1980), 5 vom: Nov., Seite 353-355 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:16 year:1980 number:5 month:11 pages:353-355 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03329563 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 16 1980 5 11 353-355 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 16(1980), 5 vom: Nov., Seite 353-355 volume:16 year:1980 number:5 month:11 pages:353-355 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 16(1980), 5 vom: Nov., Seite 353-355 volume:16 year:1980 number:5 month:11 pages:353-355 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Confidence Rating Test Sentence Complete Idea Imagery Rating Acquisition Sentence |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Kamil, Michael L. @@aut@@ Schultz, E. Eugene @@aut@@ Bernbach, Harley A. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
1980-11-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
SPR037022717 |
| id |
SPR037048783 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR037048783</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230328181704.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s1980 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3758/BF03329563</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR037048783</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)BF03329563-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kamil, Michael L.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Linguistic integration during recognition testing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1980</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The psychonomic soceity, inc. 1980</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Current interpretations of linguistic integration assume that memory integration occurs before test sentences are presented. Using an integrated recognition paradigm like that of Bransford and Franks, subjects in one study were given acquisition sentences prior to testing. In a second study, subjects did not receive the acquisition sentences. In both studies, the subjects were tested for ability to discriminate thematically incorrect sentences from thematically correct sentences under conditions of high or low sentence imagery. Subjects in both conditions were able to locate over half of the noncases when sentences were high in imagery value. This suggests that subjects might be able to comprehend and construct ideas during recognition testing. However, low-imagery sentences produced poorer ability to detect noncase sentences in both studies, suggesting that differences in processing of abstract and concrete sentences exist.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Confidence Rating</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Test Sentence</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Complete Idea</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Imagery Rating</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Acquisition Sentence</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schultz, E. Eugene</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bernbach, Harley A.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1973</subfield><subfield code="g">16(1980), 5 vom: Nov., Seite 353-355</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR037022717</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:16</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1980</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">month:11</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:353-355</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03329563</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">16</subfield><subfield code="j">1980</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="c">11</subfield><subfield code="h">353-355</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Kamil, Michael L. |
| spellingShingle |
Kamil, Michael L. misc Confidence Rating misc Test Sentence misc Complete Idea misc Imagery Rating misc Acquisition Sentence Linguistic integration during recognition testing |
| authorStr |
Kamil, Michael L. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)SPR037022717 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
Linguistic integration during recognition testing Confidence Rating (dpeaa)DE-He213 Test Sentence (dpeaa)DE-He213 Complete Idea (dpeaa)DE-He213 Imagery Rating (dpeaa)DE-He213 Acquisition Sentence (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
misc Confidence Rating misc Test Sentence misc Complete Idea misc Imagery Rating misc Acquisition Sentence |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Confidence Rating misc Test Sentence misc Complete Idea misc Imagery Rating misc Acquisition Sentence |
| topic_browse |
misc Confidence Rating misc Test Sentence misc Complete Idea misc Imagery Rating misc Acquisition Sentence |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
SPR037022717 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)SPR037022717 |
| title |
Linguistic integration during recognition testing |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR037048783 (SPR)BF03329563-e |
| title_full |
Linguistic integration during recognition testing |
| author_sort |
Kamil, Michael L. |
| journal |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
| journalStr |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
1980 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
353 |
| author_browse |
Kamil, Michael L. Schultz, E. Eugene Bernbach, Harley A. |
| container_volume |
16 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Kamil, Michael L. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.3758/BF03329563 |
| title_sort |
linguistic integration during recognition testing |
| title_auth |
Linguistic integration during recognition testing |
| abstract |
Abstract Current interpretations of linguistic integration assume that memory integration occurs before test sentences are presented. Using an integrated recognition paradigm like that of Bransford and Franks, subjects in one study were given acquisition sentences prior to testing. In a second study, subjects did not receive the acquisition sentences. In both studies, the subjects were tested for ability to discriminate thematically incorrect sentences from thematically correct sentences under conditions of high or low sentence imagery. Subjects in both conditions were able to locate over half of the noncases when sentences were high in imagery value. This suggests that subjects might be able to comprehend and construct ideas during recognition testing. However, low-imagery sentences produced poorer ability to detect noncase sentences in both studies, suggesting that differences in processing of abstract and concrete sentences exist. © The psychonomic soceity, inc. 1980 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract Current interpretations of linguistic integration assume that memory integration occurs before test sentences are presented. Using an integrated recognition paradigm like that of Bransford and Franks, subjects in one study were given acquisition sentences prior to testing. In a second study, subjects did not receive the acquisition sentences. In both studies, the subjects were tested for ability to discriminate thematically incorrect sentences from thematically correct sentences under conditions of high or low sentence imagery. Subjects in both conditions were able to locate over half of the noncases when sentences were high in imagery value. This suggests that subjects might be able to comprehend and construct ideas during recognition testing. However, low-imagery sentences produced poorer ability to detect noncase sentences in both studies, suggesting that differences in processing of abstract and concrete sentences exist. © The psychonomic soceity, inc. 1980 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Current interpretations of linguistic integration assume that memory integration occurs before test sentences are presented. Using an integrated recognition paradigm like that of Bransford and Franks, subjects in one study were given acquisition sentences prior to testing. In a second study, subjects did not receive the acquisition sentences. In both studies, the subjects were tested for ability to discriminate thematically incorrect sentences from thematically correct sentences under conditions of high or low sentence imagery. Subjects in both conditions were able to locate over half of the noncases when sentences were high in imagery value. This suggests that subjects might be able to comprehend and construct ideas during recognition testing. However, low-imagery sentences produced poorer ability to detect noncase sentences in both studies, suggesting that differences in processing of abstract and concrete sentences exist. © The psychonomic soceity, inc. 1980 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER |
| container_issue |
5 |
| title_short |
Linguistic integration during recognition testing |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03329563 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Schultz, E. Eugene Bernbach, Harley A. |
| author2Str |
Schultz, E. Eugene Bernbach, Harley A. |
| ppnlink |
SPR037022717 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.3758/BF03329563 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T20:53:27.308Z |
| _version_ |
1803592670708236288 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR037048783</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230328181704.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s1980 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3758/BF03329563</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR037048783</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)BF03329563-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kamil, Michael L.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Linguistic integration during recognition testing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1980</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The psychonomic soceity, inc. 1980</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Current interpretations of linguistic integration assume that memory integration occurs before test sentences are presented. Using an integrated recognition paradigm like that of Bransford and Franks, subjects in one study were given acquisition sentences prior to testing. In a second study, subjects did not receive the acquisition sentences. In both studies, the subjects were tested for ability to discriminate thematically incorrect sentences from thematically correct sentences under conditions of high or low sentence imagery. Subjects in both conditions were able to locate over half of the noncases when sentences were high in imagery value. This suggests that subjects might be able to comprehend and construct ideas during recognition testing. However, low-imagery sentences produced poorer ability to detect noncase sentences in both studies, suggesting that differences in processing of abstract and concrete sentences exist.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Confidence Rating</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Test Sentence</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Complete Idea</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Imagery Rating</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Acquisition Sentence</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schultz, E. Eugene</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bernbach, Harley A.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1973</subfield><subfield code="g">16(1980), 5 vom: Nov., Seite 353-355</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR037022717</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:16</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1980</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">month:11</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:353-355</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03329563</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">16</subfield><subfield code="j">1980</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="c">11</subfield><subfield code="h">353-355</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.397897 |