Encoding-retrieval interactions in memory for implicational sentences
Abstract In two experiments, subjects listened to a list of implicational sentences and performed either a comprehension or a memorization task. They were subsequently given a test of free recall or cued recall (with implications as cues). Performance in the comprehension/cued-recall condition was c...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Till, Robert E. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
1983 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1983 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society - Springer-Verlag, 1973, 21(1983), 3 vom: März, Seite 171-174 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:21 ; year:1983 ; number:3 ; month:03 ; pages:171-174 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.3758/BF03334678 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR037054279 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR037054279 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230328181723.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201007s1983 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3758/BF03334678 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR037054279 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)BF03334678-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Till, Robert E. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Encoding-retrieval interactions in memory for implicational sentences |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1983 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1983 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract In two experiments, subjects listened to a list of implicational sentences and performed either a comprehension or a memorization task. They were subsequently given a test of free recall or cued recall (with implications as cues). Performance in the comprehension/cued-recall condition was consistently better than that in the dissimilar-encoding/retrieval conditions (memorization/cued recall and comprehension/free recall), supporting the hypothesis that encoding/retrieval similarity facilitates recall. In contrast, performance in the memorization/free-recall condition was not consistently better than in the dissimilar-encoding/retrieval conditions. Thus, the advantage of encoding/retrieval similarity for recall was clear only in the case of distinctive encoding (specific comprehension responses) and distinctive retrieval cues (implications as cues). The results show the relevance of distinctiveness and encoding/retrieval compatibility for memory of meaningful material. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Memorization Task |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Free Recall |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Simple Main Effect |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Comprehension Task |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Encode Task |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |d Springer-Verlag, 1973 |g 21(1983), 3 vom: März, Seite 171-174 |w (DE-627)SPR037022717 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:21 |g year:1983 |g number:3 |g month:03 |g pages:171-174 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03334678 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 21 |j 1983 |e 3 |c 03 |h 171-174 | ||
| author_variant |
r e t re ret |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
tillroberte:1983----:noigereaitrcinimmrfrml |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
1983 |
| publishDate |
1983 |
| allfields |
10.3758/BF03334678 doi (DE-627)SPR037054279 (SPR)BF03334678-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Till, Robert E. verfasserin aut Encoding-retrieval interactions in memory for implicational sentences 1983 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1983 Abstract In two experiments, subjects listened to a list of implicational sentences and performed either a comprehension or a memorization task. They were subsequently given a test of free recall or cued recall (with implications as cues). Performance in the comprehension/cued-recall condition was consistently better than that in the dissimilar-encoding/retrieval conditions (memorization/cued recall and comprehension/free recall), supporting the hypothesis that encoding/retrieval similarity facilitates recall. In contrast, performance in the memorization/free-recall condition was not consistently better than in the dissimilar-encoding/retrieval conditions. Thus, the advantage of encoding/retrieval similarity for recall was clear only in the case of distinctive encoding (specific comprehension responses) and distinctive retrieval cues (implications as cues). The results show the relevance of distinctiveness and encoding/retrieval compatibility for memory of meaningful material. Memorization Task (dpeaa)DE-He213 Free Recall (dpeaa)DE-He213 Simple Main Effect (dpeaa)DE-He213 Comprehension Task (dpeaa)DE-He213 Encode Task (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 21(1983), 3 vom: März, Seite 171-174 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:21 year:1983 number:3 month:03 pages:171-174 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03334678 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 21 1983 3 03 171-174 |
| spelling |
10.3758/BF03334678 doi (DE-627)SPR037054279 (SPR)BF03334678-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Till, Robert E. verfasserin aut Encoding-retrieval interactions in memory for implicational sentences 1983 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1983 Abstract In two experiments, subjects listened to a list of implicational sentences and performed either a comprehension or a memorization task. They were subsequently given a test of free recall or cued recall (with implications as cues). Performance in the comprehension/cued-recall condition was consistently better than that in the dissimilar-encoding/retrieval conditions (memorization/cued recall and comprehension/free recall), supporting the hypothesis that encoding/retrieval similarity facilitates recall. In contrast, performance in the memorization/free-recall condition was not consistently better than in the dissimilar-encoding/retrieval conditions. Thus, the advantage of encoding/retrieval similarity for recall was clear only in the case of distinctive encoding (specific comprehension responses) and distinctive retrieval cues (implications as cues). The results show the relevance of distinctiveness and encoding/retrieval compatibility for memory of meaningful material. Memorization Task (dpeaa)DE-He213 Free Recall (dpeaa)DE-He213 Simple Main Effect (dpeaa)DE-He213 Comprehension Task (dpeaa)DE-He213 Encode Task (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 21(1983), 3 vom: März, Seite 171-174 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:21 year:1983 number:3 month:03 pages:171-174 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03334678 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 21 1983 3 03 171-174 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.3758/BF03334678 doi (DE-627)SPR037054279 (SPR)BF03334678-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Till, Robert E. verfasserin aut Encoding-retrieval interactions in memory for implicational sentences 1983 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1983 Abstract In two experiments, subjects listened to a list of implicational sentences and performed either a comprehension or a memorization task. They were subsequently given a test of free recall or cued recall (with implications as cues). Performance in the comprehension/cued-recall condition was consistently better than that in the dissimilar-encoding/retrieval conditions (memorization/cued recall and comprehension/free recall), supporting the hypothesis that encoding/retrieval similarity facilitates recall. In contrast, performance in the memorization/free-recall condition was not consistently better than in the dissimilar-encoding/retrieval conditions. Thus, the advantage of encoding/retrieval similarity for recall was clear only in the case of distinctive encoding (specific comprehension responses) and distinctive retrieval cues (implications as cues). The results show the relevance of distinctiveness and encoding/retrieval compatibility for memory of meaningful material. Memorization Task (dpeaa)DE-He213 Free Recall (dpeaa)DE-He213 Simple Main Effect (dpeaa)DE-He213 Comprehension Task (dpeaa)DE-He213 Encode Task (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 21(1983), 3 vom: März, Seite 171-174 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:21 year:1983 number:3 month:03 pages:171-174 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03334678 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 21 1983 3 03 171-174 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.3758/BF03334678 doi (DE-627)SPR037054279 (SPR)BF03334678-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Till, Robert E. verfasserin aut Encoding-retrieval interactions in memory for implicational sentences 1983 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1983 Abstract In two experiments, subjects listened to a list of implicational sentences and performed either a comprehension or a memorization task. They were subsequently given a test of free recall or cued recall (with implications as cues). Performance in the comprehension/cued-recall condition was consistently better than that in the dissimilar-encoding/retrieval conditions (memorization/cued recall and comprehension/free recall), supporting the hypothesis that encoding/retrieval similarity facilitates recall. In contrast, performance in the memorization/free-recall condition was not consistently better than in the dissimilar-encoding/retrieval conditions. Thus, the advantage of encoding/retrieval similarity for recall was clear only in the case of distinctive encoding (specific comprehension responses) and distinctive retrieval cues (implications as cues). The results show the relevance of distinctiveness and encoding/retrieval compatibility for memory of meaningful material. Memorization Task (dpeaa)DE-He213 Free Recall (dpeaa)DE-He213 Simple Main Effect (dpeaa)DE-He213 Comprehension Task (dpeaa)DE-He213 Encode Task (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 21(1983), 3 vom: März, Seite 171-174 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:21 year:1983 number:3 month:03 pages:171-174 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03334678 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 21 1983 3 03 171-174 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.3758/BF03334678 doi (DE-627)SPR037054279 (SPR)BF03334678-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Till, Robert E. verfasserin aut Encoding-retrieval interactions in memory for implicational sentences 1983 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1983 Abstract In two experiments, subjects listened to a list of implicational sentences and performed either a comprehension or a memorization task. They were subsequently given a test of free recall or cued recall (with implications as cues). Performance in the comprehension/cued-recall condition was consistently better than that in the dissimilar-encoding/retrieval conditions (memorization/cued recall and comprehension/free recall), supporting the hypothesis that encoding/retrieval similarity facilitates recall. In contrast, performance in the memorization/free-recall condition was not consistently better than in the dissimilar-encoding/retrieval conditions. Thus, the advantage of encoding/retrieval similarity for recall was clear only in the case of distinctive encoding (specific comprehension responses) and distinctive retrieval cues (implications as cues). The results show the relevance of distinctiveness and encoding/retrieval compatibility for memory of meaningful material. Memorization Task (dpeaa)DE-He213 Free Recall (dpeaa)DE-He213 Simple Main Effect (dpeaa)DE-He213 Comprehension Task (dpeaa)DE-He213 Encode Task (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 21(1983), 3 vom: März, Seite 171-174 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:21 year:1983 number:3 month:03 pages:171-174 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03334678 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 21 1983 3 03 171-174 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 21(1983), 3 vom: März, Seite 171-174 volume:21 year:1983 number:3 month:03 pages:171-174 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 21(1983), 3 vom: März, Seite 171-174 volume:21 year:1983 number:3 month:03 pages:171-174 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Memorization Task Free Recall Simple Main Effect Comprehension Task Encode Task |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Till, Robert E. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
1983-03-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
SPR037022717 |
| id |
SPR037054279 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR037054279</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230328181723.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s1983 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3758/BF03334678</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR037054279</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)BF03334678-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Till, Robert E.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Encoding-retrieval interactions in memory for implicational sentences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1983</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1983</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract In two experiments, subjects listened to a list of implicational sentences and performed either a comprehension or a memorization task. They were subsequently given a test of free recall or cued recall (with implications as cues). Performance in the comprehension/cued-recall condition was consistently better than that in the dissimilar-encoding/retrieval conditions (memorization/cued recall and comprehension/free recall), supporting the hypothesis that encoding/retrieval similarity facilitates recall. In contrast, performance in the memorization/free-recall condition was not consistently better than in the dissimilar-encoding/retrieval conditions. Thus, the advantage of encoding/retrieval similarity for recall was clear only in the case of distinctive encoding (specific comprehension responses) and distinctive retrieval cues (implications as cues). The results show the relevance of distinctiveness and encoding/retrieval compatibility for memory of meaningful material.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Memorization Task</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Free Recall</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Simple Main Effect</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Comprehension Task</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Encode Task</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1973</subfield><subfield code="g">21(1983), 3 vom: März, Seite 171-174</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR037022717</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:21</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1983</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:171-174</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03334678</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">21</subfield><subfield code="j">1983</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="c">03</subfield><subfield code="h">171-174</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Till, Robert E. |
| spellingShingle |
Till, Robert E. misc Memorization Task misc Free Recall misc Simple Main Effect misc Comprehension Task misc Encode Task Encoding-retrieval interactions in memory for implicational sentences |
| authorStr |
Till, Robert E. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)SPR037022717 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
Encoding-retrieval interactions in memory for implicational sentences Memorization Task (dpeaa)DE-He213 Free Recall (dpeaa)DE-He213 Simple Main Effect (dpeaa)DE-He213 Comprehension Task (dpeaa)DE-He213 Encode Task (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
misc Memorization Task misc Free Recall misc Simple Main Effect misc Comprehension Task misc Encode Task |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Memorization Task misc Free Recall misc Simple Main Effect misc Comprehension Task misc Encode Task |
| topic_browse |
misc Memorization Task misc Free Recall misc Simple Main Effect misc Comprehension Task misc Encode Task |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
SPR037022717 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)SPR037022717 |
| title |
Encoding-retrieval interactions in memory for implicational sentences |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR037054279 (SPR)BF03334678-e |
| title_full |
Encoding-retrieval interactions in memory for implicational sentences |
| author_sort |
Till, Robert E. |
| journal |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
| journalStr |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
1983 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
171 |
| author_browse |
Till, Robert E. |
| container_volume |
21 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Till, Robert E. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.3758/BF03334678 |
| title_sort |
encoding-retrieval interactions in memory for implicational sentences |
| title_auth |
Encoding-retrieval interactions in memory for implicational sentences |
| abstract |
Abstract In two experiments, subjects listened to a list of implicational sentences and performed either a comprehension or a memorization task. They were subsequently given a test of free recall or cued recall (with implications as cues). Performance in the comprehension/cued-recall condition was consistently better than that in the dissimilar-encoding/retrieval conditions (memorization/cued recall and comprehension/free recall), supporting the hypothesis that encoding/retrieval similarity facilitates recall. In contrast, performance in the memorization/free-recall condition was not consistently better than in the dissimilar-encoding/retrieval conditions. Thus, the advantage of encoding/retrieval similarity for recall was clear only in the case of distinctive encoding (specific comprehension responses) and distinctive retrieval cues (implications as cues). The results show the relevance of distinctiveness and encoding/retrieval compatibility for memory of meaningful material. © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1983 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract In two experiments, subjects listened to a list of implicational sentences and performed either a comprehension or a memorization task. They were subsequently given a test of free recall or cued recall (with implications as cues). Performance in the comprehension/cued-recall condition was consistently better than that in the dissimilar-encoding/retrieval conditions (memorization/cued recall and comprehension/free recall), supporting the hypothesis that encoding/retrieval similarity facilitates recall. In contrast, performance in the memorization/free-recall condition was not consistently better than in the dissimilar-encoding/retrieval conditions. Thus, the advantage of encoding/retrieval similarity for recall was clear only in the case of distinctive encoding (specific comprehension responses) and distinctive retrieval cues (implications as cues). The results show the relevance of distinctiveness and encoding/retrieval compatibility for memory of meaningful material. © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1983 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract In two experiments, subjects listened to a list of implicational sentences and performed either a comprehension or a memorization task. They were subsequently given a test of free recall or cued recall (with implications as cues). Performance in the comprehension/cued-recall condition was consistently better than that in the dissimilar-encoding/retrieval conditions (memorization/cued recall and comprehension/free recall), supporting the hypothesis that encoding/retrieval similarity facilitates recall. In contrast, performance in the memorization/free-recall condition was not consistently better than in the dissimilar-encoding/retrieval conditions. Thus, the advantage of encoding/retrieval similarity for recall was clear only in the case of distinctive encoding (specific comprehension responses) and distinctive retrieval cues (implications as cues). The results show the relevance of distinctiveness and encoding/retrieval compatibility for memory of meaningful material. © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1983 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER |
| container_issue |
3 |
| title_short |
Encoding-retrieval interactions in memory for implicational sentences |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03334678 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
SPR037022717 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.3758/BF03334678 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T20:54:36.719Z |
| _version_ |
1803592743486750721 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR037054279</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230328181723.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s1983 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3758/BF03334678</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR037054279</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)BF03334678-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Till, Robert E.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Encoding-retrieval interactions in memory for implicational sentences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1983</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1983</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract In two experiments, subjects listened to a list of implicational sentences and performed either a comprehension or a memorization task. They were subsequently given a test of free recall or cued recall (with implications as cues). Performance in the comprehension/cued-recall condition was consistently better than that in the dissimilar-encoding/retrieval conditions (memorization/cued recall and comprehension/free recall), supporting the hypothesis that encoding/retrieval similarity facilitates recall. In contrast, performance in the memorization/free-recall condition was not consistently better than in the dissimilar-encoding/retrieval conditions. Thus, the advantage of encoding/retrieval similarity for recall was clear only in the case of distinctive encoding (specific comprehension responses) and distinctive retrieval cues (implications as cues). The results show the relevance of distinctiveness and encoding/retrieval compatibility for memory of meaningful material.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Memorization Task</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Free Recall</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Simple Main Effect</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Comprehension Task</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Encode Task</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1973</subfield><subfield code="g">21(1983), 3 vom: März, Seite 171-174</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR037022717</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:21</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1983</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:171-174</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03334678</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">21</subfield><subfield code="j">1983</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="c">03</subfield><subfield code="h">171-174</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.401101 |