Postacquisition unexpected footshock disrupts appetitively motivated instrumental performance based on short-term retention
Abstract Water-deprived rats were trained to run for water in an E-maze on a delayed-alternation task with a 5-min retention interval. Each day, long before encountering and again long after having encountered the delayed-alternation task, all subjects consistently experienced weak footshock in Cont...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Miller, Ralph R. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
1983 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1983 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society - Springer-Verlag, 1973, 21(1983), 3 vom: März, Seite 225-228 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:21 ; year:1983 ; number:3 ; month:03 ; pages:225-228 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.3758/BF03334693 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR037054449 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR037054449 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230328181724.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201007s1983 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3758/BF03334693 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR037054449 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)BF03334693-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Miller, Ralph R. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Postacquisition unexpected footshock disrupts appetitively motivated instrumental performance based on short-term retention |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1983 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1983 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Water-deprived rats were trained to run for water in an E-maze on a delayed-alternation task with a 5-min retention interval. Each day, long before encountering and again long after having encountered the delayed-alternation task, all subjects consistently experienced weak footshock in Context A and no footshock in Context B. Contexts A and B were highly dissimilar to each other and to the E-maze. On delayed-alternation probe trials, subjects were exposed to Context A or Context B for the middle 30 sec of the delayed-alternation retention interval. Performance on these trials was unaffected when weak footshock occurred in Context A or no footshock occurred in Context B. However, when weak footshock occurred in Context B, retention was impaired. An absence of footshocks in Context A produced a nonsignificant tendency towards impairment. Thus, the disruptive effects of unexpected events that occur during the retention interval do not appear to depend upon the target and unexpected events’ having similar reinforcers or even having reinforcers of the same valence. The results are interpreted in terms of unexpected events’ recruiting more of the limited information-processing capacity of the subject than do otherwise similar expected events. Moreover, the tendency of unexpected shock to interfere with performance more than does unexpected nonshock suggests that the degree to which an unexpected event recruits processing capacity depends on the affective value of the event as well as on its unexpectedness. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Retention Interval |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Probe Trial |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Unexpected Event |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Animal Behavior Process |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Target Task |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Balaz, Mary Ann |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |d Springer-Verlag, 1973 |g 21(1983), 3 vom: März, Seite 225-228 |w (DE-627)SPR037022717 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:21 |g year:1983 |g number:3 |g month:03 |g pages:225-228 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03334693 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 21 |j 1983 |e 3 |c 03 |h 225-228 | ||
| author_variant |
r r m rr rrm m a b ma mab |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
millerralphrbalazmaryann:1983----:otcustouepcefosokirpspeiieyoiaeisrmnapro |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
1983 |
| publishDate |
1983 |
| allfields |
10.3758/BF03334693 doi (DE-627)SPR037054449 (SPR)BF03334693-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Miller, Ralph R. verfasserin aut Postacquisition unexpected footshock disrupts appetitively motivated instrumental performance based on short-term retention 1983 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1983 Abstract Water-deprived rats were trained to run for water in an E-maze on a delayed-alternation task with a 5-min retention interval. Each day, long before encountering and again long after having encountered the delayed-alternation task, all subjects consistently experienced weak footshock in Context A and no footshock in Context B. Contexts A and B were highly dissimilar to each other and to the E-maze. On delayed-alternation probe trials, subjects were exposed to Context A or Context B for the middle 30 sec of the delayed-alternation retention interval. Performance on these trials was unaffected when weak footshock occurred in Context A or no footshock occurred in Context B. However, when weak footshock occurred in Context B, retention was impaired. An absence of footshocks in Context A produced a nonsignificant tendency towards impairment. Thus, the disruptive effects of unexpected events that occur during the retention interval do not appear to depend upon the target and unexpected events’ having similar reinforcers or even having reinforcers of the same valence. The results are interpreted in terms of unexpected events’ recruiting more of the limited information-processing capacity of the subject than do otherwise similar expected events. Moreover, the tendency of unexpected shock to interfere with performance more than does unexpected nonshock suggests that the degree to which an unexpected event recruits processing capacity depends on the affective value of the event as well as on its unexpectedness. Retention Interval (dpeaa)DE-He213 Probe Trial (dpeaa)DE-He213 Unexpected Event (dpeaa)DE-He213 Animal Behavior Process (dpeaa)DE-He213 Target Task (dpeaa)DE-He213 Balaz, Mary Ann aut Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 21(1983), 3 vom: März, Seite 225-228 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:21 year:1983 number:3 month:03 pages:225-228 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03334693 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 21 1983 3 03 225-228 |
| spelling |
10.3758/BF03334693 doi (DE-627)SPR037054449 (SPR)BF03334693-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Miller, Ralph R. verfasserin aut Postacquisition unexpected footshock disrupts appetitively motivated instrumental performance based on short-term retention 1983 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1983 Abstract Water-deprived rats were trained to run for water in an E-maze on a delayed-alternation task with a 5-min retention interval. Each day, long before encountering and again long after having encountered the delayed-alternation task, all subjects consistently experienced weak footshock in Context A and no footshock in Context B. Contexts A and B were highly dissimilar to each other and to the E-maze. On delayed-alternation probe trials, subjects were exposed to Context A or Context B for the middle 30 sec of the delayed-alternation retention interval. Performance on these trials was unaffected when weak footshock occurred in Context A or no footshock occurred in Context B. However, when weak footshock occurred in Context B, retention was impaired. An absence of footshocks in Context A produced a nonsignificant tendency towards impairment. Thus, the disruptive effects of unexpected events that occur during the retention interval do not appear to depend upon the target and unexpected events’ having similar reinforcers or even having reinforcers of the same valence. The results are interpreted in terms of unexpected events’ recruiting more of the limited information-processing capacity of the subject than do otherwise similar expected events. Moreover, the tendency of unexpected shock to interfere with performance more than does unexpected nonshock suggests that the degree to which an unexpected event recruits processing capacity depends on the affective value of the event as well as on its unexpectedness. Retention Interval (dpeaa)DE-He213 Probe Trial (dpeaa)DE-He213 Unexpected Event (dpeaa)DE-He213 Animal Behavior Process (dpeaa)DE-He213 Target Task (dpeaa)DE-He213 Balaz, Mary Ann aut Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 21(1983), 3 vom: März, Seite 225-228 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:21 year:1983 number:3 month:03 pages:225-228 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03334693 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 21 1983 3 03 225-228 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.3758/BF03334693 doi (DE-627)SPR037054449 (SPR)BF03334693-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Miller, Ralph R. verfasserin aut Postacquisition unexpected footshock disrupts appetitively motivated instrumental performance based on short-term retention 1983 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1983 Abstract Water-deprived rats were trained to run for water in an E-maze on a delayed-alternation task with a 5-min retention interval. Each day, long before encountering and again long after having encountered the delayed-alternation task, all subjects consistently experienced weak footshock in Context A and no footshock in Context B. Contexts A and B were highly dissimilar to each other and to the E-maze. On delayed-alternation probe trials, subjects were exposed to Context A or Context B for the middle 30 sec of the delayed-alternation retention interval. Performance on these trials was unaffected when weak footshock occurred in Context A or no footshock occurred in Context B. However, when weak footshock occurred in Context B, retention was impaired. An absence of footshocks in Context A produced a nonsignificant tendency towards impairment. Thus, the disruptive effects of unexpected events that occur during the retention interval do not appear to depend upon the target and unexpected events’ having similar reinforcers or even having reinforcers of the same valence. The results are interpreted in terms of unexpected events’ recruiting more of the limited information-processing capacity of the subject than do otherwise similar expected events. Moreover, the tendency of unexpected shock to interfere with performance more than does unexpected nonshock suggests that the degree to which an unexpected event recruits processing capacity depends on the affective value of the event as well as on its unexpectedness. Retention Interval (dpeaa)DE-He213 Probe Trial (dpeaa)DE-He213 Unexpected Event (dpeaa)DE-He213 Animal Behavior Process (dpeaa)DE-He213 Target Task (dpeaa)DE-He213 Balaz, Mary Ann aut Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 21(1983), 3 vom: März, Seite 225-228 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:21 year:1983 number:3 month:03 pages:225-228 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03334693 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 21 1983 3 03 225-228 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.3758/BF03334693 doi (DE-627)SPR037054449 (SPR)BF03334693-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Miller, Ralph R. verfasserin aut Postacquisition unexpected footshock disrupts appetitively motivated instrumental performance based on short-term retention 1983 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1983 Abstract Water-deprived rats were trained to run for water in an E-maze on a delayed-alternation task with a 5-min retention interval. Each day, long before encountering and again long after having encountered the delayed-alternation task, all subjects consistently experienced weak footshock in Context A and no footshock in Context B. Contexts A and B were highly dissimilar to each other and to the E-maze. On delayed-alternation probe trials, subjects were exposed to Context A or Context B for the middle 30 sec of the delayed-alternation retention interval. Performance on these trials was unaffected when weak footshock occurred in Context A or no footshock occurred in Context B. However, when weak footshock occurred in Context B, retention was impaired. An absence of footshocks in Context A produced a nonsignificant tendency towards impairment. Thus, the disruptive effects of unexpected events that occur during the retention interval do not appear to depend upon the target and unexpected events’ having similar reinforcers or even having reinforcers of the same valence. The results are interpreted in terms of unexpected events’ recruiting more of the limited information-processing capacity of the subject than do otherwise similar expected events. Moreover, the tendency of unexpected shock to interfere with performance more than does unexpected nonshock suggests that the degree to which an unexpected event recruits processing capacity depends on the affective value of the event as well as on its unexpectedness. Retention Interval (dpeaa)DE-He213 Probe Trial (dpeaa)DE-He213 Unexpected Event (dpeaa)DE-He213 Animal Behavior Process (dpeaa)DE-He213 Target Task (dpeaa)DE-He213 Balaz, Mary Ann aut Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 21(1983), 3 vom: März, Seite 225-228 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:21 year:1983 number:3 month:03 pages:225-228 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03334693 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 21 1983 3 03 225-228 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.3758/BF03334693 doi (DE-627)SPR037054449 (SPR)BF03334693-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Miller, Ralph R. verfasserin aut Postacquisition unexpected footshock disrupts appetitively motivated instrumental performance based on short-term retention 1983 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1983 Abstract Water-deprived rats were trained to run for water in an E-maze on a delayed-alternation task with a 5-min retention interval. Each day, long before encountering and again long after having encountered the delayed-alternation task, all subjects consistently experienced weak footshock in Context A and no footshock in Context B. Contexts A and B were highly dissimilar to each other and to the E-maze. On delayed-alternation probe trials, subjects were exposed to Context A or Context B for the middle 30 sec of the delayed-alternation retention interval. Performance on these trials was unaffected when weak footshock occurred in Context A or no footshock occurred in Context B. However, when weak footshock occurred in Context B, retention was impaired. An absence of footshocks in Context A produced a nonsignificant tendency towards impairment. Thus, the disruptive effects of unexpected events that occur during the retention interval do not appear to depend upon the target and unexpected events’ having similar reinforcers or even having reinforcers of the same valence. The results are interpreted in terms of unexpected events’ recruiting more of the limited information-processing capacity of the subject than do otherwise similar expected events. Moreover, the tendency of unexpected shock to interfere with performance more than does unexpected nonshock suggests that the degree to which an unexpected event recruits processing capacity depends on the affective value of the event as well as on its unexpectedness. Retention Interval (dpeaa)DE-He213 Probe Trial (dpeaa)DE-He213 Unexpected Event (dpeaa)DE-He213 Animal Behavior Process (dpeaa)DE-He213 Target Task (dpeaa)DE-He213 Balaz, Mary Ann aut Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 21(1983), 3 vom: März, Seite 225-228 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:21 year:1983 number:3 month:03 pages:225-228 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03334693 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 21 1983 3 03 225-228 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 21(1983), 3 vom: März, Seite 225-228 volume:21 year:1983 number:3 month:03 pages:225-228 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 21(1983), 3 vom: März, Seite 225-228 volume:21 year:1983 number:3 month:03 pages:225-228 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Retention Interval Probe Trial Unexpected Event Animal Behavior Process Target Task |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Miller, Ralph R. @@aut@@ Balaz, Mary Ann @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
1983-03-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
SPR037022717 |
| id |
SPR037054449 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR037054449</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230328181724.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s1983 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3758/BF03334693</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR037054449</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)BF03334693-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Miller, Ralph R.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Postacquisition unexpected footshock disrupts appetitively motivated instrumental performance based on short-term retention</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1983</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1983</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Water-deprived rats were trained to run for water in an E-maze on a delayed-alternation task with a 5-min retention interval. Each day, long before encountering and again long after having encountered the delayed-alternation task, all subjects consistently experienced weak footshock in Context A and no footshock in Context B. Contexts A and B were highly dissimilar to each other and to the E-maze. On delayed-alternation probe trials, subjects were exposed to Context A or Context B for the middle 30 sec of the delayed-alternation retention interval. Performance on these trials was unaffected when weak footshock occurred in Context A or no footshock occurred in Context B. However, when weak footshock occurred in Context B, retention was impaired. An absence of footshocks in Context A produced a nonsignificant tendency towards impairment. Thus, the disruptive effects of unexpected events that occur during the retention interval do not appear to depend upon the target and unexpected events’ having similar reinforcers or even having reinforcers of the same valence. The results are interpreted in terms of unexpected events’ recruiting more of the limited information-processing capacity of the subject than do otherwise similar expected events. Moreover, the tendency of unexpected shock to interfere with performance more than does unexpected nonshock suggests that the degree to which an unexpected event recruits processing capacity depends on the affective value of the event as well as on its unexpectedness.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Retention Interval</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Probe Trial</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Unexpected Event</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Animal Behavior Process</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Target Task</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Balaz, Mary Ann</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1973</subfield><subfield code="g">21(1983), 3 vom: März, Seite 225-228</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR037022717</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:21</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1983</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:225-228</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03334693</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">21</subfield><subfield code="j">1983</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="c">03</subfield><subfield code="h">225-228</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Miller, Ralph R. |
| spellingShingle |
Miller, Ralph R. misc Retention Interval misc Probe Trial misc Unexpected Event misc Animal Behavior Process misc Target Task Postacquisition unexpected footshock disrupts appetitively motivated instrumental performance based on short-term retention |
| authorStr |
Miller, Ralph R. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)SPR037022717 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
Postacquisition unexpected footshock disrupts appetitively motivated instrumental performance based on short-term retention Retention Interval (dpeaa)DE-He213 Probe Trial (dpeaa)DE-He213 Unexpected Event (dpeaa)DE-He213 Animal Behavior Process (dpeaa)DE-He213 Target Task (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
misc Retention Interval misc Probe Trial misc Unexpected Event misc Animal Behavior Process misc Target Task |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Retention Interval misc Probe Trial misc Unexpected Event misc Animal Behavior Process misc Target Task |
| topic_browse |
misc Retention Interval misc Probe Trial misc Unexpected Event misc Animal Behavior Process misc Target Task |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
SPR037022717 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)SPR037022717 |
| title |
Postacquisition unexpected footshock disrupts appetitively motivated instrumental performance based on short-term retention |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR037054449 (SPR)BF03334693-e |
| title_full |
Postacquisition unexpected footshock disrupts appetitively motivated instrumental performance based on short-term retention |
| author_sort |
Miller, Ralph R. |
| journal |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
| journalStr |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
1983 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
225 |
| author_browse |
Miller, Ralph R. Balaz, Mary Ann |
| container_volume |
21 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Miller, Ralph R. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.3758/BF03334693 |
| title_sort |
postacquisition unexpected footshock disrupts appetitively motivated instrumental performance based on short-term retention |
| title_auth |
Postacquisition unexpected footshock disrupts appetitively motivated instrumental performance based on short-term retention |
| abstract |
Abstract Water-deprived rats were trained to run for water in an E-maze on a delayed-alternation task with a 5-min retention interval. Each day, long before encountering and again long after having encountered the delayed-alternation task, all subjects consistently experienced weak footshock in Context A and no footshock in Context B. Contexts A and B were highly dissimilar to each other and to the E-maze. On delayed-alternation probe trials, subjects were exposed to Context A or Context B for the middle 30 sec of the delayed-alternation retention interval. Performance on these trials was unaffected when weak footshock occurred in Context A or no footshock occurred in Context B. However, when weak footshock occurred in Context B, retention was impaired. An absence of footshocks in Context A produced a nonsignificant tendency towards impairment. Thus, the disruptive effects of unexpected events that occur during the retention interval do not appear to depend upon the target and unexpected events’ having similar reinforcers or even having reinforcers of the same valence. The results are interpreted in terms of unexpected events’ recruiting more of the limited information-processing capacity of the subject than do otherwise similar expected events. Moreover, the tendency of unexpected shock to interfere with performance more than does unexpected nonshock suggests that the degree to which an unexpected event recruits processing capacity depends on the affective value of the event as well as on its unexpectedness. © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1983 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract Water-deprived rats were trained to run for water in an E-maze on a delayed-alternation task with a 5-min retention interval. Each day, long before encountering and again long after having encountered the delayed-alternation task, all subjects consistently experienced weak footshock in Context A and no footshock in Context B. Contexts A and B were highly dissimilar to each other and to the E-maze. On delayed-alternation probe trials, subjects were exposed to Context A or Context B for the middle 30 sec of the delayed-alternation retention interval. Performance on these trials was unaffected when weak footshock occurred in Context A or no footshock occurred in Context B. However, when weak footshock occurred in Context B, retention was impaired. An absence of footshocks in Context A produced a nonsignificant tendency towards impairment. Thus, the disruptive effects of unexpected events that occur during the retention interval do not appear to depend upon the target and unexpected events’ having similar reinforcers or even having reinforcers of the same valence. The results are interpreted in terms of unexpected events’ recruiting more of the limited information-processing capacity of the subject than do otherwise similar expected events. Moreover, the tendency of unexpected shock to interfere with performance more than does unexpected nonshock suggests that the degree to which an unexpected event recruits processing capacity depends on the affective value of the event as well as on its unexpectedness. © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1983 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Water-deprived rats were trained to run for water in an E-maze on a delayed-alternation task with a 5-min retention interval. Each day, long before encountering and again long after having encountered the delayed-alternation task, all subjects consistently experienced weak footshock in Context A and no footshock in Context B. Contexts A and B were highly dissimilar to each other and to the E-maze. On delayed-alternation probe trials, subjects were exposed to Context A or Context B for the middle 30 sec of the delayed-alternation retention interval. Performance on these trials was unaffected when weak footshock occurred in Context A or no footshock occurred in Context B. However, when weak footshock occurred in Context B, retention was impaired. An absence of footshocks in Context A produced a nonsignificant tendency towards impairment. Thus, the disruptive effects of unexpected events that occur during the retention interval do not appear to depend upon the target and unexpected events’ having similar reinforcers or even having reinforcers of the same valence. The results are interpreted in terms of unexpected events’ recruiting more of the limited information-processing capacity of the subject than do otherwise similar expected events. Moreover, the tendency of unexpected shock to interfere with performance more than does unexpected nonshock suggests that the degree to which an unexpected event recruits processing capacity depends on the affective value of the event as well as on its unexpectedness. © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1983 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER |
| container_issue |
3 |
| title_short |
Postacquisition unexpected footshock disrupts appetitively motivated instrumental performance based on short-term retention |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03334693 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Balaz, Mary Ann |
| author2Str |
Balaz, Mary Ann |
| ppnlink |
SPR037022717 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.3758/BF03334693 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T20:54:39.012Z |
| _version_ |
1803592745893232640 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR037054449</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230328181724.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s1983 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3758/BF03334693</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR037054449</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)BF03334693-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Miller, Ralph R.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Postacquisition unexpected footshock disrupts appetitively motivated instrumental performance based on short-term retention</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1983</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1983</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Water-deprived rats were trained to run for water in an E-maze on a delayed-alternation task with a 5-min retention interval. Each day, long before encountering and again long after having encountered the delayed-alternation task, all subjects consistently experienced weak footshock in Context A and no footshock in Context B. Contexts A and B were highly dissimilar to each other and to the E-maze. On delayed-alternation probe trials, subjects were exposed to Context A or Context B for the middle 30 sec of the delayed-alternation retention interval. Performance on these trials was unaffected when weak footshock occurred in Context A or no footshock occurred in Context B. However, when weak footshock occurred in Context B, retention was impaired. An absence of footshocks in Context A produced a nonsignificant tendency towards impairment. Thus, the disruptive effects of unexpected events that occur during the retention interval do not appear to depend upon the target and unexpected events’ having similar reinforcers or even having reinforcers of the same valence. The results are interpreted in terms of unexpected events’ recruiting more of the limited information-processing capacity of the subject than do otherwise similar expected events. Moreover, the tendency of unexpected shock to interfere with performance more than does unexpected nonshock suggests that the degree to which an unexpected event recruits processing capacity depends on the affective value of the event as well as on its unexpectedness.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Retention Interval</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Probe Trial</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Unexpected Event</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Animal Behavior Process</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Target Task</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Balaz, Mary Ann</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1973</subfield><subfield code="g">21(1983), 3 vom: März, Seite 225-228</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR037022717</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:21</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1983</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:225-228</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03334693</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">21</subfield><subfield code="j">1983</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="c">03</subfield><subfield code="h">225-228</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3980417 |