Extinction does not depend upon degradation of event memories
Abstract Rescorla’s “event-memory” hypothesis posits that extinction decrement is due in part to a weakening of a central unconditioned stimulus (US) representation that is shared by all stimuli associated with a particular US. Thus, extinction of one stimulus conditioned to a US should decrease con...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Kasprow, Wesley J. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
1984 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1984 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society - Springer-Verlag, 1973, 22(1984), 2 vom: Aug., Seite 95-98 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:22 ; year:1984 ; number:2 ; month:08 ; pages:95-98 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.3758/BF03333773 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR037055569 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR037055569 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230328181727.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201007s1984 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3758/BF03333773 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR037055569 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)BF03333773-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kasprow, Wesley J. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Extinction does not depend upon degradation of event memories |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1984 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1984 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Rescorla’s “event-memory” hypothesis posits that extinction decrement is due in part to a weakening of a central unconditioned stimulus (US) representation that is shared by all stimuli associated with a particular US. Thus, extinction of one stimulus conditioned to a US should decrease conditioned responding to a second stimulus that has been independently conditioned to the same US. In each of the present experiments, after excitatory conditioning to two stimuli separately, some rats experienced repeated nonreinforced presentations of one of the conditioned stimuli, while others were given no such exposures. Despite parametric variations across experiments, no reliable attenuation of suppression to the nonextinguished stimulus was evident during testing. Tests for suppression to the extinguished stimulus demonstrated a traditional extinction decrement. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Conditioned Stimulus |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Test Trial |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Test Stimulus |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Unconditioned Stimulus |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Conditioned Suppression |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Schachtman, Todd R. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cacheiro, Haydee |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Miller, Ralph R. |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |d Springer-Verlag, 1973 |g 22(1984), 2 vom: Aug., Seite 95-98 |w (DE-627)SPR037022717 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:22 |g year:1984 |g number:2 |g month:08 |g pages:95-98 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03333773 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 22 |j 1984 |e 2 |c 08 |h 95-98 | ||
| author_variant |
w j k wj wjk t r s tr trs h c hc r r m rr rrm |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
kasprowwesleyjschachtmantoddrcacheirohay:1984----:xicinosodpnuodgaain |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
1984 |
| publishDate |
1984 |
| allfields |
10.3758/BF03333773 doi (DE-627)SPR037055569 (SPR)BF03333773-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kasprow, Wesley J. verfasserin aut Extinction does not depend upon degradation of event memories 1984 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1984 Abstract Rescorla’s “event-memory” hypothesis posits that extinction decrement is due in part to a weakening of a central unconditioned stimulus (US) representation that is shared by all stimuli associated with a particular US. Thus, extinction of one stimulus conditioned to a US should decrease conditioned responding to a second stimulus that has been independently conditioned to the same US. In each of the present experiments, after excitatory conditioning to two stimuli separately, some rats experienced repeated nonreinforced presentations of one of the conditioned stimuli, while others were given no such exposures. Despite parametric variations across experiments, no reliable attenuation of suppression to the nonextinguished stimulus was evident during testing. Tests for suppression to the extinguished stimulus demonstrated a traditional extinction decrement. Conditioned Stimulus (dpeaa)DE-He213 Test Trial (dpeaa)DE-He213 Test Stimulus (dpeaa)DE-He213 Unconditioned Stimulus (dpeaa)DE-He213 Conditioned Suppression (dpeaa)DE-He213 Schachtman, Todd R. aut Cacheiro, Haydee aut Miller, Ralph R. aut Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 22(1984), 2 vom: Aug., Seite 95-98 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:22 year:1984 number:2 month:08 pages:95-98 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03333773 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 22 1984 2 08 95-98 |
| spelling |
10.3758/BF03333773 doi (DE-627)SPR037055569 (SPR)BF03333773-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kasprow, Wesley J. verfasserin aut Extinction does not depend upon degradation of event memories 1984 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1984 Abstract Rescorla’s “event-memory” hypothesis posits that extinction decrement is due in part to a weakening of a central unconditioned stimulus (US) representation that is shared by all stimuli associated with a particular US. Thus, extinction of one stimulus conditioned to a US should decrease conditioned responding to a second stimulus that has been independently conditioned to the same US. In each of the present experiments, after excitatory conditioning to two stimuli separately, some rats experienced repeated nonreinforced presentations of one of the conditioned stimuli, while others were given no such exposures. Despite parametric variations across experiments, no reliable attenuation of suppression to the nonextinguished stimulus was evident during testing. Tests for suppression to the extinguished stimulus demonstrated a traditional extinction decrement. Conditioned Stimulus (dpeaa)DE-He213 Test Trial (dpeaa)DE-He213 Test Stimulus (dpeaa)DE-He213 Unconditioned Stimulus (dpeaa)DE-He213 Conditioned Suppression (dpeaa)DE-He213 Schachtman, Todd R. aut Cacheiro, Haydee aut Miller, Ralph R. aut Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 22(1984), 2 vom: Aug., Seite 95-98 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:22 year:1984 number:2 month:08 pages:95-98 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03333773 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 22 1984 2 08 95-98 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.3758/BF03333773 doi (DE-627)SPR037055569 (SPR)BF03333773-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kasprow, Wesley J. verfasserin aut Extinction does not depend upon degradation of event memories 1984 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1984 Abstract Rescorla’s “event-memory” hypothesis posits that extinction decrement is due in part to a weakening of a central unconditioned stimulus (US) representation that is shared by all stimuli associated with a particular US. Thus, extinction of one stimulus conditioned to a US should decrease conditioned responding to a second stimulus that has been independently conditioned to the same US. In each of the present experiments, after excitatory conditioning to two stimuli separately, some rats experienced repeated nonreinforced presentations of one of the conditioned stimuli, while others were given no such exposures. Despite parametric variations across experiments, no reliable attenuation of suppression to the nonextinguished stimulus was evident during testing. Tests for suppression to the extinguished stimulus demonstrated a traditional extinction decrement. Conditioned Stimulus (dpeaa)DE-He213 Test Trial (dpeaa)DE-He213 Test Stimulus (dpeaa)DE-He213 Unconditioned Stimulus (dpeaa)DE-He213 Conditioned Suppression (dpeaa)DE-He213 Schachtman, Todd R. aut Cacheiro, Haydee aut Miller, Ralph R. aut Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 22(1984), 2 vom: Aug., Seite 95-98 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:22 year:1984 number:2 month:08 pages:95-98 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03333773 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 22 1984 2 08 95-98 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.3758/BF03333773 doi (DE-627)SPR037055569 (SPR)BF03333773-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kasprow, Wesley J. verfasserin aut Extinction does not depend upon degradation of event memories 1984 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1984 Abstract Rescorla’s “event-memory” hypothesis posits that extinction decrement is due in part to a weakening of a central unconditioned stimulus (US) representation that is shared by all stimuli associated with a particular US. Thus, extinction of one stimulus conditioned to a US should decrease conditioned responding to a second stimulus that has been independently conditioned to the same US. In each of the present experiments, after excitatory conditioning to two stimuli separately, some rats experienced repeated nonreinforced presentations of one of the conditioned stimuli, while others were given no such exposures. Despite parametric variations across experiments, no reliable attenuation of suppression to the nonextinguished stimulus was evident during testing. Tests for suppression to the extinguished stimulus demonstrated a traditional extinction decrement. Conditioned Stimulus (dpeaa)DE-He213 Test Trial (dpeaa)DE-He213 Test Stimulus (dpeaa)DE-He213 Unconditioned Stimulus (dpeaa)DE-He213 Conditioned Suppression (dpeaa)DE-He213 Schachtman, Todd R. aut Cacheiro, Haydee aut Miller, Ralph R. aut Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 22(1984), 2 vom: Aug., Seite 95-98 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:22 year:1984 number:2 month:08 pages:95-98 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03333773 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 22 1984 2 08 95-98 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.3758/BF03333773 doi (DE-627)SPR037055569 (SPR)BF03333773-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kasprow, Wesley J. verfasserin aut Extinction does not depend upon degradation of event memories 1984 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1984 Abstract Rescorla’s “event-memory” hypothesis posits that extinction decrement is due in part to a weakening of a central unconditioned stimulus (US) representation that is shared by all stimuli associated with a particular US. Thus, extinction of one stimulus conditioned to a US should decrease conditioned responding to a second stimulus that has been independently conditioned to the same US. In each of the present experiments, after excitatory conditioning to two stimuli separately, some rats experienced repeated nonreinforced presentations of one of the conditioned stimuli, while others were given no such exposures. Despite parametric variations across experiments, no reliable attenuation of suppression to the nonextinguished stimulus was evident during testing. Tests for suppression to the extinguished stimulus demonstrated a traditional extinction decrement. Conditioned Stimulus (dpeaa)DE-He213 Test Trial (dpeaa)DE-He213 Test Stimulus (dpeaa)DE-He213 Unconditioned Stimulus (dpeaa)DE-He213 Conditioned Suppression (dpeaa)DE-He213 Schachtman, Todd R. aut Cacheiro, Haydee aut Miller, Ralph R. aut Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 22(1984), 2 vom: Aug., Seite 95-98 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:22 year:1984 number:2 month:08 pages:95-98 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03333773 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 22 1984 2 08 95-98 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 22(1984), 2 vom: Aug., Seite 95-98 volume:22 year:1984 number:2 month:08 pages:95-98 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 22(1984), 2 vom: Aug., Seite 95-98 volume:22 year:1984 number:2 month:08 pages:95-98 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Conditioned Stimulus Test Trial Test Stimulus Unconditioned Stimulus Conditioned Suppression |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Kasprow, Wesley J. @@aut@@ Schachtman, Todd R. @@aut@@ Cacheiro, Haydee @@aut@@ Miller, Ralph R. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
1984-08-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
SPR037022717 |
| id |
SPR037055569 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR037055569</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230328181727.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s1984 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3758/BF03333773</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR037055569</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)BF03333773-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kasprow, Wesley J.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Extinction does not depend upon degradation of event memories</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1984</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1984</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Rescorla’s “event-memory” hypothesis posits that extinction decrement is due in part to a weakening of a central unconditioned stimulus (US) representation that is shared by all stimuli associated with a particular US. Thus, extinction of one stimulus conditioned to a US should decrease conditioned responding to a second stimulus that has been independently conditioned to the same US. In each of the present experiments, after excitatory conditioning to two stimuli separately, some rats experienced repeated nonreinforced presentations of one of the conditioned stimuli, while others were given no such exposures. Despite parametric variations across experiments, no reliable attenuation of suppression to the nonextinguished stimulus was evident during testing. Tests for suppression to the extinguished stimulus demonstrated a traditional extinction decrement.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conditioned Stimulus</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Test Trial</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Test Stimulus</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Unconditioned Stimulus</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conditioned Suppression</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schachtman, Todd R.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cacheiro, Haydee</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Miller, Ralph R.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1973</subfield><subfield code="g">22(1984), 2 vom: Aug., Seite 95-98</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR037022717</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:22</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1984</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">month:08</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:95-98</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03333773</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">22</subfield><subfield code="j">1984</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="c">08</subfield><subfield code="h">95-98</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Kasprow, Wesley J. |
| spellingShingle |
Kasprow, Wesley J. misc Conditioned Stimulus misc Test Trial misc Test Stimulus misc Unconditioned Stimulus misc Conditioned Suppression Extinction does not depend upon degradation of event memories |
| authorStr |
Kasprow, Wesley J. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)SPR037022717 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
Extinction does not depend upon degradation of event memories Conditioned Stimulus (dpeaa)DE-He213 Test Trial (dpeaa)DE-He213 Test Stimulus (dpeaa)DE-He213 Unconditioned Stimulus (dpeaa)DE-He213 Conditioned Suppression (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
misc Conditioned Stimulus misc Test Trial misc Test Stimulus misc Unconditioned Stimulus misc Conditioned Suppression |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Conditioned Stimulus misc Test Trial misc Test Stimulus misc Unconditioned Stimulus misc Conditioned Suppression |
| topic_browse |
misc Conditioned Stimulus misc Test Trial misc Test Stimulus misc Unconditioned Stimulus misc Conditioned Suppression |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
SPR037022717 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)SPR037022717 |
| title |
Extinction does not depend upon degradation of event memories |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR037055569 (SPR)BF03333773-e |
| title_full |
Extinction does not depend upon degradation of event memories |
| author_sort |
Kasprow, Wesley J. |
| journal |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
| journalStr |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
1984 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
95 |
| author_browse |
Kasprow, Wesley J. Schachtman, Todd R. Cacheiro, Haydee Miller, Ralph R. |
| container_volume |
22 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Kasprow, Wesley J. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.3758/BF03333773 |
| title_sort |
extinction does not depend upon degradation of event memories |
| title_auth |
Extinction does not depend upon degradation of event memories |
| abstract |
Abstract Rescorla’s “event-memory” hypothesis posits that extinction decrement is due in part to a weakening of a central unconditioned stimulus (US) representation that is shared by all stimuli associated with a particular US. Thus, extinction of one stimulus conditioned to a US should decrease conditioned responding to a second stimulus that has been independently conditioned to the same US. In each of the present experiments, after excitatory conditioning to two stimuli separately, some rats experienced repeated nonreinforced presentations of one of the conditioned stimuli, while others were given no such exposures. Despite parametric variations across experiments, no reliable attenuation of suppression to the nonextinguished stimulus was evident during testing. Tests for suppression to the extinguished stimulus demonstrated a traditional extinction decrement. © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1984 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract Rescorla’s “event-memory” hypothesis posits that extinction decrement is due in part to a weakening of a central unconditioned stimulus (US) representation that is shared by all stimuli associated with a particular US. Thus, extinction of one stimulus conditioned to a US should decrease conditioned responding to a second stimulus that has been independently conditioned to the same US. In each of the present experiments, after excitatory conditioning to two stimuli separately, some rats experienced repeated nonreinforced presentations of one of the conditioned stimuli, while others were given no such exposures. Despite parametric variations across experiments, no reliable attenuation of suppression to the nonextinguished stimulus was evident during testing. Tests for suppression to the extinguished stimulus demonstrated a traditional extinction decrement. © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1984 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Rescorla’s “event-memory” hypothesis posits that extinction decrement is due in part to a weakening of a central unconditioned stimulus (US) representation that is shared by all stimuli associated with a particular US. Thus, extinction of one stimulus conditioned to a US should decrease conditioned responding to a second stimulus that has been independently conditioned to the same US. In each of the present experiments, after excitatory conditioning to two stimuli separately, some rats experienced repeated nonreinforced presentations of one of the conditioned stimuli, while others were given no such exposures. Despite parametric variations across experiments, no reliable attenuation of suppression to the nonextinguished stimulus was evident during testing. Tests for suppression to the extinguished stimulus demonstrated a traditional extinction decrement. © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1984 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
Extinction does not depend upon degradation of event memories |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03333773 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Schachtman, Todd R. Cacheiro, Haydee Miller, Ralph R. |
| author2Str |
Schachtman, Todd R. Cacheiro, Haydee Miller, Ralph R. |
| ppnlink |
SPR037022717 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.3758/BF03333773 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T20:54:52.427Z |
| _version_ |
1803592759961976832 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR037055569</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230328181727.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s1984 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3758/BF03333773</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR037055569</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)BF03333773-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kasprow, Wesley J.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Extinction does not depend upon degradation of event memories</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1984</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1984</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Rescorla’s “event-memory” hypothesis posits that extinction decrement is due in part to a weakening of a central unconditioned stimulus (US) representation that is shared by all stimuli associated with a particular US. Thus, extinction of one stimulus conditioned to a US should decrease conditioned responding to a second stimulus that has been independently conditioned to the same US. In each of the present experiments, after excitatory conditioning to two stimuli separately, some rats experienced repeated nonreinforced presentations of one of the conditioned stimuli, while others were given no such exposures. Despite parametric variations across experiments, no reliable attenuation of suppression to the nonextinguished stimulus was evident during testing. Tests for suppression to the extinguished stimulus demonstrated a traditional extinction decrement.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conditioned Stimulus</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Test Trial</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Test Stimulus</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Unconditioned Stimulus</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conditioned Suppression</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schachtman, Todd R.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cacheiro, Haydee</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Miller, Ralph R.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1973</subfield><subfield code="g">22(1984), 2 vom: Aug., Seite 95-98</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR037022717</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:22</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1984</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">month:08</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:95-98</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03333773</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">22</subfield><subfield code="j">1984</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="c">08</subfield><subfield code="h">95-98</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399276 |