Dynamics of guessing behavior: Between-group versus within-group designs
Abstract Within-group and between-group designs have traditionally been employed in research studies that investigate test-taking behavior, particularly guessing behavior. Although within-group designs provide both control for random between-group differences and increased statistical power to detec...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Plake, Barbara S. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
1986 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1986 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society - Springer-Verlag, 1973, 24(1986), 4 vom: Okt., Seite 251-253 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:24 ; year:1986 ; number:4 ; month:10 ; pages:251-253 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.3758/BF03330131 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR037059866 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR037059866 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230328181743.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201007s1986 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3758/BF03330131 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR037059866 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)BF03330131-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Plake, Barbara S. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Dynamics of guessing behavior: Between-group versus within-group designs |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1986 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1986 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Within-group and between-group designs have traditionally been employed in research studies that investigate test-taking behavior, particularly guessing behavior. Although within-group designs provide both control for random between-group differences and increased statistical power to detect treatment effects, they are potentially flawed due to carryover effects incurred by administering the same items to the same subjects. Although between-group designs provide a potentially cleaner assessment of test-taking behavior, they allow only inferences to group, not individual, test-taking behaviors. Since test-taking behavior has been shown to be related to individual differences in personality variables, results from between-group designs provide less than optimal information about individual-specific test-taking behavior. By utilizing modifications of the typical within-group designs, carryover effects may be estimated and controlled for, allowing for increased internal validity of within-group designs for the study of test-taking behavior. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Carryover Effect |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Design Paradigm |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Optimal Information |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Detect Treatment Effect |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Clean Assessment |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wise, Steven L. |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |d Springer-Verlag, 1973 |g 24(1986), 4 vom: Okt., Seite 251-253 |w (DE-627)SPR037022717 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:24 |g year:1986 |g number:4 |g month:10 |g pages:251-253 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03330131 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 24 |j 1986 |e 4 |c 10 |h 251-253 | ||
| author_variant |
b s p bs bsp s l w sl slw |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
plakebarbaraswisestevenl:1986----:yaisfusigeairewegopess |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
1986 |
| publishDate |
1986 |
| allfields |
10.3758/BF03330131 doi (DE-627)SPR037059866 (SPR)BF03330131-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Plake, Barbara S. verfasserin aut Dynamics of guessing behavior: Between-group versus within-group designs 1986 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1986 Abstract Within-group and between-group designs have traditionally been employed in research studies that investigate test-taking behavior, particularly guessing behavior. Although within-group designs provide both control for random between-group differences and increased statistical power to detect treatment effects, they are potentially flawed due to carryover effects incurred by administering the same items to the same subjects. Although between-group designs provide a potentially cleaner assessment of test-taking behavior, they allow only inferences to group, not individual, test-taking behaviors. Since test-taking behavior has been shown to be related to individual differences in personality variables, results from between-group designs provide less than optimal information about individual-specific test-taking behavior. By utilizing modifications of the typical within-group designs, carryover effects may be estimated and controlled for, allowing for increased internal validity of within-group designs for the study of test-taking behavior. Carryover Effect (dpeaa)DE-He213 Design Paradigm (dpeaa)DE-He213 Optimal Information (dpeaa)DE-He213 Detect Treatment Effect (dpeaa)DE-He213 Clean Assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Wise, Steven L. aut Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 24(1986), 4 vom: Okt., Seite 251-253 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:24 year:1986 number:4 month:10 pages:251-253 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03330131 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 24 1986 4 10 251-253 |
| spelling |
10.3758/BF03330131 doi (DE-627)SPR037059866 (SPR)BF03330131-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Plake, Barbara S. verfasserin aut Dynamics of guessing behavior: Between-group versus within-group designs 1986 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1986 Abstract Within-group and between-group designs have traditionally been employed in research studies that investigate test-taking behavior, particularly guessing behavior. Although within-group designs provide both control for random between-group differences and increased statistical power to detect treatment effects, they are potentially flawed due to carryover effects incurred by administering the same items to the same subjects. Although between-group designs provide a potentially cleaner assessment of test-taking behavior, they allow only inferences to group, not individual, test-taking behaviors. Since test-taking behavior has been shown to be related to individual differences in personality variables, results from between-group designs provide less than optimal information about individual-specific test-taking behavior. By utilizing modifications of the typical within-group designs, carryover effects may be estimated and controlled for, allowing for increased internal validity of within-group designs for the study of test-taking behavior. Carryover Effect (dpeaa)DE-He213 Design Paradigm (dpeaa)DE-He213 Optimal Information (dpeaa)DE-He213 Detect Treatment Effect (dpeaa)DE-He213 Clean Assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Wise, Steven L. aut Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 24(1986), 4 vom: Okt., Seite 251-253 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:24 year:1986 number:4 month:10 pages:251-253 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03330131 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 24 1986 4 10 251-253 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.3758/BF03330131 doi (DE-627)SPR037059866 (SPR)BF03330131-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Plake, Barbara S. verfasserin aut Dynamics of guessing behavior: Between-group versus within-group designs 1986 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1986 Abstract Within-group and between-group designs have traditionally been employed in research studies that investigate test-taking behavior, particularly guessing behavior. Although within-group designs provide both control for random between-group differences and increased statistical power to detect treatment effects, they are potentially flawed due to carryover effects incurred by administering the same items to the same subjects. Although between-group designs provide a potentially cleaner assessment of test-taking behavior, they allow only inferences to group, not individual, test-taking behaviors. Since test-taking behavior has been shown to be related to individual differences in personality variables, results from between-group designs provide less than optimal information about individual-specific test-taking behavior. By utilizing modifications of the typical within-group designs, carryover effects may be estimated and controlled for, allowing for increased internal validity of within-group designs for the study of test-taking behavior. Carryover Effect (dpeaa)DE-He213 Design Paradigm (dpeaa)DE-He213 Optimal Information (dpeaa)DE-He213 Detect Treatment Effect (dpeaa)DE-He213 Clean Assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Wise, Steven L. aut Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 24(1986), 4 vom: Okt., Seite 251-253 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:24 year:1986 number:4 month:10 pages:251-253 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03330131 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 24 1986 4 10 251-253 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.3758/BF03330131 doi (DE-627)SPR037059866 (SPR)BF03330131-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Plake, Barbara S. verfasserin aut Dynamics of guessing behavior: Between-group versus within-group designs 1986 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1986 Abstract Within-group and between-group designs have traditionally been employed in research studies that investigate test-taking behavior, particularly guessing behavior. Although within-group designs provide both control for random between-group differences and increased statistical power to detect treatment effects, they are potentially flawed due to carryover effects incurred by administering the same items to the same subjects. Although between-group designs provide a potentially cleaner assessment of test-taking behavior, they allow only inferences to group, not individual, test-taking behaviors. Since test-taking behavior has been shown to be related to individual differences in personality variables, results from between-group designs provide less than optimal information about individual-specific test-taking behavior. By utilizing modifications of the typical within-group designs, carryover effects may be estimated and controlled for, allowing for increased internal validity of within-group designs for the study of test-taking behavior. Carryover Effect (dpeaa)DE-He213 Design Paradigm (dpeaa)DE-He213 Optimal Information (dpeaa)DE-He213 Detect Treatment Effect (dpeaa)DE-He213 Clean Assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Wise, Steven L. aut Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 24(1986), 4 vom: Okt., Seite 251-253 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:24 year:1986 number:4 month:10 pages:251-253 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03330131 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 24 1986 4 10 251-253 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.3758/BF03330131 doi (DE-627)SPR037059866 (SPR)BF03330131-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Plake, Barbara S. verfasserin aut Dynamics of guessing behavior: Between-group versus within-group designs 1986 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1986 Abstract Within-group and between-group designs have traditionally been employed in research studies that investigate test-taking behavior, particularly guessing behavior. Although within-group designs provide both control for random between-group differences and increased statistical power to detect treatment effects, they are potentially flawed due to carryover effects incurred by administering the same items to the same subjects. Although between-group designs provide a potentially cleaner assessment of test-taking behavior, they allow only inferences to group, not individual, test-taking behaviors. Since test-taking behavior has been shown to be related to individual differences in personality variables, results from between-group designs provide less than optimal information about individual-specific test-taking behavior. By utilizing modifications of the typical within-group designs, carryover effects may be estimated and controlled for, allowing for increased internal validity of within-group designs for the study of test-taking behavior. Carryover Effect (dpeaa)DE-He213 Design Paradigm (dpeaa)DE-He213 Optimal Information (dpeaa)DE-He213 Detect Treatment Effect (dpeaa)DE-He213 Clean Assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Wise, Steven L. aut Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 24(1986), 4 vom: Okt., Seite 251-253 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:24 year:1986 number:4 month:10 pages:251-253 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03330131 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 24 1986 4 10 251-253 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 24(1986), 4 vom: Okt., Seite 251-253 volume:24 year:1986 number:4 month:10 pages:251-253 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 24(1986), 4 vom: Okt., Seite 251-253 volume:24 year:1986 number:4 month:10 pages:251-253 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Carryover Effect Design Paradigm Optimal Information Detect Treatment Effect Clean Assessment |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Plake, Barbara S. @@aut@@ Wise, Steven L. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
1986-10-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
SPR037022717 |
| id |
SPR037059866 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR037059866</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230328181743.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s1986 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3758/BF03330131</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR037059866</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)BF03330131-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Plake, Barbara S.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Dynamics of guessing behavior: Between-group versus within-group designs</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1986</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1986</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Within-group and between-group designs have traditionally been employed in research studies that investigate test-taking behavior, particularly guessing behavior. Although within-group designs provide both control for random between-group differences and increased statistical power to detect treatment effects, they are potentially flawed due to carryover effects incurred by administering the same items to the same subjects. Although between-group designs provide a potentially cleaner assessment of test-taking behavior, they allow only inferences to group, not individual, test-taking behaviors. Since test-taking behavior has been shown to be related to individual differences in personality variables, results from between-group designs provide less than optimal information about individual-specific test-taking behavior. By utilizing modifications of the typical within-group designs, carryover effects may be estimated and controlled for, allowing for increased internal validity of within-group designs for the study of test-taking behavior.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Carryover Effect</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Design Paradigm</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Optimal Information</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Detect Treatment Effect</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Clean Assessment</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wise, Steven L.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1973</subfield><subfield code="g">24(1986), 4 vom: Okt., Seite 251-253</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR037022717</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:24</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1986</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:251-253</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03330131</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">24</subfield><subfield code="j">1986</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="c">10</subfield><subfield code="h">251-253</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Plake, Barbara S. |
| spellingShingle |
Plake, Barbara S. misc Carryover Effect misc Design Paradigm misc Optimal Information misc Detect Treatment Effect misc Clean Assessment Dynamics of guessing behavior: Between-group versus within-group designs |
| authorStr |
Plake, Barbara S. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)SPR037022717 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
Dynamics of guessing behavior: Between-group versus within-group designs Carryover Effect (dpeaa)DE-He213 Design Paradigm (dpeaa)DE-He213 Optimal Information (dpeaa)DE-He213 Detect Treatment Effect (dpeaa)DE-He213 Clean Assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
misc Carryover Effect misc Design Paradigm misc Optimal Information misc Detect Treatment Effect misc Clean Assessment |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Carryover Effect misc Design Paradigm misc Optimal Information misc Detect Treatment Effect misc Clean Assessment |
| topic_browse |
misc Carryover Effect misc Design Paradigm misc Optimal Information misc Detect Treatment Effect misc Clean Assessment |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
SPR037022717 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)SPR037022717 |
| title |
Dynamics of guessing behavior: Between-group versus within-group designs |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR037059866 (SPR)BF03330131-e |
| title_full |
Dynamics of guessing behavior: Between-group versus within-group designs |
| author_sort |
Plake, Barbara S. |
| journal |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
| journalStr |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
1986 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
251 |
| author_browse |
Plake, Barbara S. Wise, Steven L. |
| container_volume |
24 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Plake, Barbara S. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.3758/BF03330131 |
| title_sort |
dynamics of guessing behavior: between-group versus within-group designs |
| title_auth |
Dynamics of guessing behavior: Between-group versus within-group designs |
| abstract |
Abstract Within-group and between-group designs have traditionally been employed in research studies that investigate test-taking behavior, particularly guessing behavior. Although within-group designs provide both control for random between-group differences and increased statistical power to detect treatment effects, they are potentially flawed due to carryover effects incurred by administering the same items to the same subjects. Although between-group designs provide a potentially cleaner assessment of test-taking behavior, they allow only inferences to group, not individual, test-taking behaviors. Since test-taking behavior has been shown to be related to individual differences in personality variables, results from between-group designs provide less than optimal information about individual-specific test-taking behavior. By utilizing modifications of the typical within-group designs, carryover effects may be estimated and controlled for, allowing for increased internal validity of within-group designs for the study of test-taking behavior. © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1986 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract Within-group and between-group designs have traditionally been employed in research studies that investigate test-taking behavior, particularly guessing behavior. Although within-group designs provide both control for random between-group differences and increased statistical power to detect treatment effects, they are potentially flawed due to carryover effects incurred by administering the same items to the same subjects. Although between-group designs provide a potentially cleaner assessment of test-taking behavior, they allow only inferences to group, not individual, test-taking behaviors. Since test-taking behavior has been shown to be related to individual differences in personality variables, results from between-group designs provide less than optimal information about individual-specific test-taking behavior. By utilizing modifications of the typical within-group designs, carryover effects may be estimated and controlled for, allowing for increased internal validity of within-group designs for the study of test-taking behavior. © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1986 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Within-group and between-group designs have traditionally been employed in research studies that investigate test-taking behavior, particularly guessing behavior. Although within-group designs provide both control for random between-group differences and increased statistical power to detect treatment effects, they are potentially flawed due to carryover effects incurred by administering the same items to the same subjects. Although between-group designs provide a potentially cleaner assessment of test-taking behavior, they allow only inferences to group, not individual, test-taking behaviors. Since test-taking behavior has been shown to be related to individual differences in personality variables, results from between-group designs provide less than optimal information about individual-specific test-taking behavior. By utilizing modifications of the typical within-group designs, carryover effects may be estimated and controlled for, allowing for increased internal validity of within-group designs for the study of test-taking behavior. © Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1986 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER |
| container_issue |
4 |
| title_short |
Dynamics of guessing behavior: Between-group versus within-group designs |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03330131 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Wise, Steven L. |
| author2Str |
Wise, Steven L. |
| ppnlink |
SPR037022717 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.3758/BF03330131 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T20:55:48.198Z |
| _version_ |
1803592818441060352 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR037059866</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230328181743.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s1986 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3758/BF03330131</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR037059866</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)BF03330131-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Plake, Barbara S.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Dynamics of guessing behavior: Between-group versus within-group designs</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1986</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1986</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Within-group and between-group designs have traditionally been employed in research studies that investigate test-taking behavior, particularly guessing behavior. Although within-group designs provide both control for random between-group differences and increased statistical power to detect treatment effects, they are potentially flawed due to carryover effects incurred by administering the same items to the same subjects. Although between-group designs provide a potentially cleaner assessment of test-taking behavior, they allow only inferences to group, not individual, test-taking behaviors. Since test-taking behavior has been shown to be related to individual differences in personality variables, results from between-group designs provide less than optimal information about individual-specific test-taking behavior. By utilizing modifications of the typical within-group designs, carryover effects may be estimated and controlled for, allowing for increased internal validity of within-group designs for the study of test-taking behavior.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Carryover Effect</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Design Paradigm</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Optimal Information</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Detect Treatment Effect</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Clean Assessment</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wise, Steven L.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1973</subfield><subfield code="g">24(1986), 4 vom: Okt., Seite 251-253</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR037022717</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:24</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1986</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:251-253</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03330131</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">24</subfield><subfield code="j">1986</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="c">10</subfield><subfield code="h">251-253</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4004316 |