Human time estimation: Procedural effects
Abstract The purpose of this experiment was to investigate the effects of various trial procedures on human time estimation. Four different procedures were used: (1) experimenter-paced intertrial interval/experimenter-paced retention interval, (2) self-paced intertrial interval/experimenterpaced ret...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Guay, Michel [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
1988 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© The Psychonomic Soceity, Inc. 1988 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society - Springer-Verlag, 1973, 26(1988), 1 vom: Juli, Seite 19-22 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:26 ; year:1988 ; number:1 ; month:07 ; pages:19-22 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.3758/BF03334848 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR037062123 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR037062123 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230328181750.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201007s1988 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3758/BF03334848 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR037062123 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)BF03334848-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Guay, Michel |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Human time estimation: Procedural effects |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1988 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © The Psychonomic Soceity, Inc. 1988 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract The purpose of this experiment was to investigate the effects of various trial procedures on human time estimation. Four different procedures were used: (1) experimenter-paced intertrial interval/experimenter-paced retention interval, (2) self-paced intertrial interval/experimenterpaced retention interval, (3) experimenter-paced intertrial interval/self-paced retention interval, and (4) self-paced intertrial interval/self-paced retention interval. Auditory time lengths of 1, 4, and 8 sec were estimated by the method of reproduction. Results showed that the two self-paced retention interval conditions produced a typical range effect in that the 1-sec criterion duration was overestimated and the 4- and 8-sec durations were underestimated. In addition, the two homogeneous trial conditions (i.e., procedures 1 and 4 above) produced more accurate time estimation performance than did the two heterogeneous conditions. Variable error increased as the duration of the time to be estimated increased, and subjects were more variable under the two experimenter-paced retention interval conditions than under the two self-paced conditions. We concluded that the self-paced intertrial interval/self-paced retention interval condition seems to be the best procedure to maximize time-estimation performance. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Retention Interval |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Constant Error |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Trial Interval |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Interval Condition |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Trial Procedure |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Salmoni, Alan W. |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |d Springer-Verlag, 1973 |g 26(1988), 1 vom: Juli, Seite 19-22 |w (DE-627)SPR037022717 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:26 |g year:1988 |g number:1 |g month:07 |g pages:19-22 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03334848 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 26 |j 1988 |e 1 |c 07 |h 19-22 | ||
| author_variant |
m g mg a w s aw aws |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
guaymichelsalmonialanw:1988----:uatmetmtopoeu |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
1988 |
| publishDate |
1988 |
| allfields |
10.3758/BF03334848 doi (DE-627)SPR037062123 (SPR)BF03334848-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Guay, Michel verfasserin aut Human time estimation: Procedural effects 1988 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Psychonomic Soceity, Inc. 1988 Abstract The purpose of this experiment was to investigate the effects of various trial procedures on human time estimation. Four different procedures were used: (1) experimenter-paced intertrial interval/experimenter-paced retention interval, (2) self-paced intertrial interval/experimenterpaced retention interval, (3) experimenter-paced intertrial interval/self-paced retention interval, and (4) self-paced intertrial interval/self-paced retention interval. Auditory time lengths of 1, 4, and 8 sec were estimated by the method of reproduction. Results showed that the two self-paced retention interval conditions produced a typical range effect in that the 1-sec criterion duration was overestimated and the 4- and 8-sec durations were underestimated. In addition, the two homogeneous trial conditions (i.e., procedures 1 and 4 above) produced more accurate time estimation performance than did the two heterogeneous conditions. Variable error increased as the duration of the time to be estimated increased, and subjects were more variable under the two experimenter-paced retention interval conditions than under the two self-paced conditions. We concluded that the self-paced intertrial interval/self-paced retention interval condition seems to be the best procedure to maximize time-estimation performance. Retention Interval (dpeaa)DE-He213 Constant Error (dpeaa)DE-He213 Trial Interval (dpeaa)DE-He213 Interval Condition (dpeaa)DE-He213 Trial Procedure (dpeaa)DE-He213 Salmoni, Alan W. aut Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 26(1988), 1 vom: Juli, Seite 19-22 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:26 year:1988 number:1 month:07 pages:19-22 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03334848 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 26 1988 1 07 19-22 |
| spelling |
10.3758/BF03334848 doi (DE-627)SPR037062123 (SPR)BF03334848-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Guay, Michel verfasserin aut Human time estimation: Procedural effects 1988 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Psychonomic Soceity, Inc. 1988 Abstract The purpose of this experiment was to investigate the effects of various trial procedures on human time estimation. Four different procedures were used: (1) experimenter-paced intertrial interval/experimenter-paced retention interval, (2) self-paced intertrial interval/experimenterpaced retention interval, (3) experimenter-paced intertrial interval/self-paced retention interval, and (4) self-paced intertrial interval/self-paced retention interval. Auditory time lengths of 1, 4, and 8 sec were estimated by the method of reproduction. Results showed that the two self-paced retention interval conditions produced a typical range effect in that the 1-sec criterion duration was overestimated and the 4- and 8-sec durations were underestimated. In addition, the two homogeneous trial conditions (i.e., procedures 1 and 4 above) produced more accurate time estimation performance than did the two heterogeneous conditions. Variable error increased as the duration of the time to be estimated increased, and subjects were more variable under the two experimenter-paced retention interval conditions than under the two self-paced conditions. We concluded that the self-paced intertrial interval/self-paced retention interval condition seems to be the best procedure to maximize time-estimation performance. Retention Interval (dpeaa)DE-He213 Constant Error (dpeaa)DE-He213 Trial Interval (dpeaa)DE-He213 Interval Condition (dpeaa)DE-He213 Trial Procedure (dpeaa)DE-He213 Salmoni, Alan W. aut Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 26(1988), 1 vom: Juli, Seite 19-22 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:26 year:1988 number:1 month:07 pages:19-22 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03334848 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 26 1988 1 07 19-22 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.3758/BF03334848 doi (DE-627)SPR037062123 (SPR)BF03334848-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Guay, Michel verfasserin aut Human time estimation: Procedural effects 1988 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Psychonomic Soceity, Inc. 1988 Abstract The purpose of this experiment was to investigate the effects of various trial procedures on human time estimation. Four different procedures were used: (1) experimenter-paced intertrial interval/experimenter-paced retention interval, (2) self-paced intertrial interval/experimenterpaced retention interval, (3) experimenter-paced intertrial interval/self-paced retention interval, and (4) self-paced intertrial interval/self-paced retention interval. Auditory time lengths of 1, 4, and 8 sec were estimated by the method of reproduction. Results showed that the two self-paced retention interval conditions produced a typical range effect in that the 1-sec criterion duration was overestimated and the 4- and 8-sec durations were underestimated. In addition, the two homogeneous trial conditions (i.e., procedures 1 and 4 above) produced more accurate time estimation performance than did the two heterogeneous conditions. Variable error increased as the duration of the time to be estimated increased, and subjects were more variable under the two experimenter-paced retention interval conditions than under the two self-paced conditions. We concluded that the self-paced intertrial interval/self-paced retention interval condition seems to be the best procedure to maximize time-estimation performance. Retention Interval (dpeaa)DE-He213 Constant Error (dpeaa)DE-He213 Trial Interval (dpeaa)DE-He213 Interval Condition (dpeaa)DE-He213 Trial Procedure (dpeaa)DE-He213 Salmoni, Alan W. aut Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 26(1988), 1 vom: Juli, Seite 19-22 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:26 year:1988 number:1 month:07 pages:19-22 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03334848 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 26 1988 1 07 19-22 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.3758/BF03334848 doi (DE-627)SPR037062123 (SPR)BF03334848-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Guay, Michel verfasserin aut Human time estimation: Procedural effects 1988 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Psychonomic Soceity, Inc. 1988 Abstract The purpose of this experiment was to investigate the effects of various trial procedures on human time estimation. Four different procedures were used: (1) experimenter-paced intertrial interval/experimenter-paced retention interval, (2) self-paced intertrial interval/experimenterpaced retention interval, (3) experimenter-paced intertrial interval/self-paced retention interval, and (4) self-paced intertrial interval/self-paced retention interval. Auditory time lengths of 1, 4, and 8 sec were estimated by the method of reproduction. Results showed that the two self-paced retention interval conditions produced a typical range effect in that the 1-sec criterion duration was overestimated and the 4- and 8-sec durations were underestimated. In addition, the two homogeneous trial conditions (i.e., procedures 1 and 4 above) produced more accurate time estimation performance than did the two heterogeneous conditions. Variable error increased as the duration of the time to be estimated increased, and subjects were more variable under the two experimenter-paced retention interval conditions than under the two self-paced conditions. We concluded that the self-paced intertrial interval/self-paced retention interval condition seems to be the best procedure to maximize time-estimation performance. Retention Interval (dpeaa)DE-He213 Constant Error (dpeaa)DE-He213 Trial Interval (dpeaa)DE-He213 Interval Condition (dpeaa)DE-He213 Trial Procedure (dpeaa)DE-He213 Salmoni, Alan W. aut Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 26(1988), 1 vom: Juli, Seite 19-22 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:26 year:1988 number:1 month:07 pages:19-22 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03334848 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 26 1988 1 07 19-22 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.3758/BF03334848 doi (DE-627)SPR037062123 (SPR)BF03334848-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Guay, Michel verfasserin aut Human time estimation: Procedural effects 1988 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Psychonomic Soceity, Inc. 1988 Abstract The purpose of this experiment was to investigate the effects of various trial procedures on human time estimation. Four different procedures were used: (1) experimenter-paced intertrial interval/experimenter-paced retention interval, (2) self-paced intertrial interval/experimenterpaced retention interval, (3) experimenter-paced intertrial interval/self-paced retention interval, and (4) self-paced intertrial interval/self-paced retention interval. Auditory time lengths of 1, 4, and 8 sec were estimated by the method of reproduction. Results showed that the two self-paced retention interval conditions produced a typical range effect in that the 1-sec criterion duration was overestimated and the 4- and 8-sec durations were underestimated. In addition, the two homogeneous trial conditions (i.e., procedures 1 and 4 above) produced more accurate time estimation performance than did the two heterogeneous conditions. Variable error increased as the duration of the time to be estimated increased, and subjects were more variable under the two experimenter-paced retention interval conditions than under the two self-paced conditions. We concluded that the self-paced intertrial interval/self-paced retention interval condition seems to be the best procedure to maximize time-estimation performance. Retention Interval (dpeaa)DE-He213 Constant Error (dpeaa)DE-He213 Trial Interval (dpeaa)DE-He213 Interval Condition (dpeaa)DE-He213 Trial Procedure (dpeaa)DE-He213 Salmoni, Alan W. aut Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society Springer-Verlag, 1973 26(1988), 1 vom: Juli, Seite 19-22 (DE-627)SPR037022717 nnns volume:26 year:1988 number:1 month:07 pages:19-22 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03334848 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 26 1988 1 07 19-22 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 26(1988), 1 vom: Juli, Seite 19-22 volume:26 year:1988 number:1 month:07 pages:19-22 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 26(1988), 1 vom: Juli, Seite 19-22 volume:26 year:1988 number:1 month:07 pages:19-22 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Retention Interval Constant Error Trial Interval Interval Condition Trial Procedure |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Guay, Michel @@aut@@ Salmoni, Alan W. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
1988-07-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
SPR037022717 |
| id |
SPR037062123 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR037062123</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230328181750.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s1988 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3758/BF03334848</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR037062123</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)BF03334848-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Guay, Michel</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Human time estimation: Procedural effects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1988</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Psychonomic Soceity, Inc. 1988</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The purpose of this experiment was to investigate the effects of various trial procedures on human time estimation. Four different procedures were used: (1) experimenter-paced intertrial interval/experimenter-paced retention interval, (2) self-paced intertrial interval/experimenterpaced retention interval, (3) experimenter-paced intertrial interval/self-paced retention interval, and (4) self-paced intertrial interval/self-paced retention interval. Auditory time lengths of 1, 4, and 8 sec were estimated by the method of reproduction. Results showed that the two self-paced retention interval conditions produced a typical range effect in that the 1-sec criterion duration was overestimated and the 4- and 8-sec durations were underestimated. In addition, the two homogeneous trial conditions (i.e., procedures 1 and 4 above) produced more accurate time estimation performance than did the two heterogeneous conditions. Variable error increased as the duration of the time to be estimated increased, and subjects were more variable under the two experimenter-paced retention interval conditions than under the two self-paced conditions. We concluded that the self-paced intertrial interval/self-paced retention interval condition seems to be the best procedure to maximize time-estimation performance.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Retention Interval</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constant Error</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Trial Interval</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Interval Condition</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Trial Procedure</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Salmoni, Alan W.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1973</subfield><subfield code="g">26(1988), 1 vom: Juli, Seite 19-22</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR037022717</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:26</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1988</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:07</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:19-22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03334848</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">26</subfield><subfield code="j">1988</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="c">07</subfield><subfield code="h">19-22</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Guay, Michel |
| spellingShingle |
Guay, Michel misc Retention Interval misc Constant Error misc Trial Interval misc Interval Condition misc Trial Procedure Human time estimation: Procedural effects |
| authorStr |
Guay, Michel |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)SPR037022717 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
Human time estimation: Procedural effects Retention Interval (dpeaa)DE-He213 Constant Error (dpeaa)DE-He213 Trial Interval (dpeaa)DE-He213 Interval Condition (dpeaa)DE-He213 Trial Procedure (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
misc Retention Interval misc Constant Error misc Trial Interval misc Interval Condition misc Trial Procedure |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Retention Interval misc Constant Error misc Trial Interval misc Interval Condition misc Trial Procedure |
| topic_browse |
misc Retention Interval misc Constant Error misc Trial Interval misc Interval Condition misc Trial Procedure |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
SPR037022717 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)SPR037022717 |
| title |
Human time estimation: Procedural effects |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR037062123 (SPR)BF03334848-e |
| title_full |
Human time estimation: Procedural effects |
| author_sort |
Guay, Michel |
| journal |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
| journalStr |
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
1988 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
19 |
| author_browse |
Guay, Michel Salmoni, Alan W. |
| container_volume |
26 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Guay, Michel |
| doi_str_mv |
10.3758/BF03334848 |
| title_sort |
human time estimation: procedural effects |
| title_auth |
Human time estimation: Procedural effects |
| abstract |
Abstract The purpose of this experiment was to investigate the effects of various trial procedures on human time estimation. Four different procedures were used: (1) experimenter-paced intertrial interval/experimenter-paced retention interval, (2) self-paced intertrial interval/experimenterpaced retention interval, (3) experimenter-paced intertrial interval/self-paced retention interval, and (4) self-paced intertrial interval/self-paced retention interval. Auditory time lengths of 1, 4, and 8 sec were estimated by the method of reproduction. Results showed that the two self-paced retention interval conditions produced a typical range effect in that the 1-sec criterion duration was overestimated and the 4- and 8-sec durations were underestimated. In addition, the two homogeneous trial conditions (i.e., procedures 1 and 4 above) produced more accurate time estimation performance than did the two heterogeneous conditions. Variable error increased as the duration of the time to be estimated increased, and subjects were more variable under the two experimenter-paced retention interval conditions than under the two self-paced conditions. We concluded that the self-paced intertrial interval/self-paced retention interval condition seems to be the best procedure to maximize time-estimation performance. © The Psychonomic Soceity, Inc. 1988 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract The purpose of this experiment was to investigate the effects of various trial procedures on human time estimation. Four different procedures were used: (1) experimenter-paced intertrial interval/experimenter-paced retention interval, (2) self-paced intertrial interval/experimenterpaced retention interval, (3) experimenter-paced intertrial interval/self-paced retention interval, and (4) self-paced intertrial interval/self-paced retention interval. Auditory time lengths of 1, 4, and 8 sec were estimated by the method of reproduction. Results showed that the two self-paced retention interval conditions produced a typical range effect in that the 1-sec criterion duration was overestimated and the 4- and 8-sec durations were underestimated. In addition, the two homogeneous trial conditions (i.e., procedures 1 and 4 above) produced more accurate time estimation performance than did the two heterogeneous conditions. Variable error increased as the duration of the time to be estimated increased, and subjects were more variable under the two experimenter-paced retention interval conditions than under the two self-paced conditions. We concluded that the self-paced intertrial interval/self-paced retention interval condition seems to be the best procedure to maximize time-estimation performance. © The Psychonomic Soceity, Inc. 1988 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract The purpose of this experiment was to investigate the effects of various trial procedures on human time estimation. Four different procedures were used: (1) experimenter-paced intertrial interval/experimenter-paced retention interval, (2) self-paced intertrial interval/experimenterpaced retention interval, (3) experimenter-paced intertrial interval/self-paced retention interval, and (4) self-paced intertrial interval/self-paced retention interval. Auditory time lengths of 1, 4, and 8 sec were estimated by the method of reproduction. Results showed that the two self-paced retention interval conditions produced a typical range effect in that the 1-sec criterion duration was overestimated and the 4- and 8-sec durations were underestimated. In addition, the two homogeneous trial conditions (i.e., procedures 1 and 4 above) produced more accurate time estimation performance than did the two heterogeneous conditions. Variable error increased as the duration of the time to be estimated increased, and subjects were more variable under the two experimenter-paced retention interval conditions than under the two self-paced conditions. We concluded that the self-paced intertrial interval/self-paced retention interval condition seems to be the best procedure to maximize time-estimation performance. © The Psychonomic Soceity, Inc. 1988 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
Human time estimation: Procedural effects |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03334848 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Salmoni, Alan W. |
| author2Str |
Salmoni, Alan W. |
| ppnlink |
SPR037022717 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.3758/BF03334848 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T20:56:14.979Z |
| _version_ |
1803592846518779905 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR037062123</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230328181750.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s1988 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3758/BF03334848</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR037062123</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)BF03334848-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Guay, Michel</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Human time estimation: Procedural effects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1988</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Psychonomic Soceity, Inc. 1988</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The purpose of this experiment was to investigate the effects of various trial procedures on human time estimation. Four different procedures were used: (1) experimenter-paced intertrial interval/experimenter-paced retention interval, (2) self-paced intertrial interval/experimenterpaced retention interval, (3) experimenter-paced intertrial interval/self-paced retention interval, and (4) self-paced intertrial interval/self-paced retention interval. Auditory time lengths of 1, 4, and 8 sec were estimated by the method of reproduction. Results showed that the two self-paced retention interval conditions produced a typical range effect in that the 1-sec criterion duration was overestimated and the 4- and 8-sec durations were underestimated. In addition, the two homogeneous trial conditions (i.e., procedures 1 and 4 above) produced more accurate time estimation performance than did the two heterogeneous conditions. Variable error increased as the duration of the time to be estimated increased, and subjects were more variable under the two experimenter-paced retention interval conditions than under the two self-paced conditions. We concluded that the self-paced intertrial interval/self-paced retention interval condition seems to be the best procedure to maximize time-estimation performance.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Retention Interval</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constant Error</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Trial Interval</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Interval Condition</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Trial Procedure</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Salmoni, Alan W.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1973</subfield><subfield code="g">26(1988), 1 vom: Juli, Seite 19-22</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR037022717</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:26</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1988</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:07</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:19-22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03334848</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">26</subfield><subfield code="j">1988</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="c">07</subfield><subfield code="h">19-22</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4011335 |