Shared Decision-Making and Patient Satisfaction in Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A New “Preference Fit” Framework for Treatment Assessment

Introduction We have developed a new framework to assess shared decision-making (SDM) as a tool to improve patient satisfaction. This framework is based on a “preference fit” index that relates SDM to patient treatment preferences and patient satisfaction in a sample of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) pat...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Mahlich, Jörg [verfasserIn] Schaede, Ulrike [verfasserIn] Sruamsiri, Rosarin [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2019

Schlagwörter:	Depression Japan Patient satisfaction Rheumatoid arthritis Shared decision-making Treatment preference fit

Anmerkung:	© The Author(s) 2019

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Rheumatology and therapy - Springer Healthcare, 2014, 6(2019), 2 vom: 02. Mai, Seite 269-283
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:6 ; year:2019 ; number:2 ; day:02 ; month:05 ; pages:269-283

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4

Katalog-ID:	SPR037213385

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	SPR037213385
003	DE-627
005	20240824064906.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	201007s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)SPR037213385
035			\|a (SPR)s40744-019-0156-4-e
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 610 \|q VZ
100	1		\|a Mahlich, Jörg \|e verfasserin \|0 (orcid)0000-0003-1110-2793 \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Shared Decision-Making and Patient Satisfaction in Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A New “Preference Fit” Framework for Treatment Assessment
264		1	\|c 2019
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
500			\|a © The Author(s) 2019
520			\|a Introduction We have developed a new framework to assess shared decision-making (SDM) as a tool to improve patient satisfaction. This framework is based on a “preference fit” index that relates SDM to patient treatment preferences and patient satisfaction in a sample of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in Japan. Methods We surveyed 500 RA patients in Japan and explored the interactions between the treatment preference fit index, SDM, and overall patient satisfaction. Results Our new preference fit index reveals significant impact on patient satisfaction: the better the fit between SDM and patient preferences, the higher the patient satisfaction with the current treatment. Patients treated with biologic agents were more satisfied. Patients suffering from depression or migraines scored significantly lower both on our preference fit measure and for overall patient satisfaction. Conclusion The association between depression and a low treatment preference fit suggests that depression may pose challenges to SDM and that doctors in Japan are less attuned to the SDM preferences of depressed patients. Funding Janssen Pharmaceutical KK.
650		4	\|a Depression \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Japan \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Patient satisfaction \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Rheumatoid arthritis \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Shared decision-making \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Treatment preference fit \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
700	1		\|a Schaede, Ulrike \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Sruamsiri, Rosarin \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Rheumatology and therapy \|d Springer Healthcare, 2014 \|g 6(2019), 2 vom: 02. Mai, Seite 269-283 \|w (DE-627)795566832 \|w (DE-600)2783278-8 \|x 2198-6584 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:6 \|g year:2019 \|g number:2 \|g day:02 \|g month:05 \|g pages:269-283
856	4	0	\|u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4 \|m X:SPRINGER \|x Resolving-System \|z kostenfrei \|3 Volltext
912			\|a SYSFLAG_0
912			\|a GBV_SPRINGER
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHA
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 6 \|j 2019 \|e 2 \|b 02 \|c 05 \|h 269-283

Indexfelder

author_variant	j m jm u s us r s rs
matchkey_str	article:21986584:2019----::hrdeiinaignptetaifcinnaaeehuaodrhiiptetaepeeec
hierarchy_sort_str	2019
publishDate	2019
allfields	10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4 doi (DE-627)SPR037213385 (SPR)s40744-019-0156-4-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ Mahlich, Jörg verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-1110-2793 aut Shared Decision-Making and Patient Satisfaction in Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A New “Preference Fit” Framework for Treatment Assessment 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2019 Introduction We have developed a new framework to assess shared decision-making (SDM) as a tool to improve patient satisfaction. This framework is based on a “preference fit” index that relates SDM to patient treatment preferences and patient satisfaction in a sample of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in Japan. Methods We surveyed 500 RA patients in Japan and explored the interactions between the treatment preference fit index, SDM, and overall patient satisfaction. Results Our new preference fit index reveals significant impact on patient satisfaction: the better the fit between SDM and patient preferences, the higher the patient satisfaction with the current treatment. Patients treated with biologic agents were more satisfied. Patients suffering from depression or migraines scored significantly lower both on our preference fit measure and for overall patient satisfaction. Conclusion The association between depression and a low treatment preference fit suggests that depression may pose challenges to SDM and that doctors in Japan are less attuned to the SDM preferences of depressed patients. Funding Janssen Pharmaceutical KK. Depression (dpeaa)DE-He213 Japan (dpeaa)DE-He213 Patient satisfaction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Rheumatoid arthritis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Shared decision-making (dpeaa)DE-He213 Treatment preference fit (dpeaa)DE-He213 Schaede, Ulrike verfasserin aut Sruamsiri, Rosarin verfasserin aut Enthalten in Rheumatology and therapy Springer Healthcare, 2014 6(2019), 2 vom: 02. Mai, Seite 269-283 (DE-627)795566832 (DE-600)2783278-8 2198-6584 nnns volume:6 year:2019 number:2 day:02 month:05 pages:269-283 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4 X:SPRINGER Resolving-System kostenfrei Volltext SYSFLAG_0 GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 6 2019 2 02 05 269-283
spelling	10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4 doi (DE-627)SPR037213385 (SPR)s40744-019-0156-4-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ Mahlich, Jörg verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-1110-2793 aut Shared Decision-Making and Patient Satisfaction in Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A New “Preference Fit” Framework for Treatment Assessment 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2019 Introduction We have developed a new framework to assess shared decision-making (SDM) as a tool to improve patient satisfaction. This framework is based on a “preference fit” index that relates SDM to patient treatment preferences and patient satisfaction in a sample of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in Japan. Methods We surveyed 500 RA patients in Japan and explored the interactions between the treatment preference fit index, SDM, and overall patient satisfaction. Results Our new preference fit index reveals significant impact on patient satisfaction: the better the fit between SDM and patient preferences, the higher the patient satisfaction with the current treatment. Patients treated with biologic agents were more satisfied. Patients suffering from depression or migraines scored significantly lower both on our preference fit measure and for overall patient satisfaction. Conclusion The association between depression and a low treatment preference fit suggests that depression may pose challenges to SDM and that doctors in Japan are less attuned to the SDM preferences of depressed patients. Funding Janssen Pharmaceutical KK. Depression (dpeaa)DE-He213 Japan (dpeaa)DE-He213 Patient satisfaction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Rheumatoid arthritis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Shared decision-making (dpeaa)DE-He213 Treatment preference fit (dpeaa)DE-He213 Schaede, Ulrike verfasserin aut Sruamsiri, Rosarin verfasserin aut Enthalten in Rheumatology and therapy Springer Healthcare, 2014 6(2019), 2 vom: 02. Mai, Seite 269-283 (DE-627)795566832 (DE-600)2783278-8 2198-6584 nnns volume:6 year:2019 number:2 day:02 month:05 pages:269-283 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4 X:SPRINGER Resolving-System kostenfrei Volltext SYSFLAG_0 GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 6 2019 2 02 05 269-283
allfields_unstemmed	10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4 doi (DE-627)SPR037213385 (SPR)s40744-019-0156-4-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ Mahlich, Jörg verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-1110-2793 aut Shared Decision-Making and Patient Satisfaction in Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A New “Preference Fit” Framework for Treatment Assessment 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2019 Introduction We have developed a new framework to assess shared decision-making (SDM) as a tool to improve patient satisfaction. This framework is based on a “preference fit” index that relates SDM to patient treatment preferences and patient satisfaction in a sample of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in Japan. Methods We surveyed 500 RA patients in Japan and explored the interactions between the treatment preference fit index, SDM, and overall patient satisfaction. Results Our new preference fit index reveals significant impact on patient satisfaction: the better the fit between SDM and patient preferences, the higher the patient satisfaction with the current treatment. Patients treated with biologic agents were more satisfied. Patients suffering from depression or migraines scored significantly lower both on our preference fit measure and for overall patient satisfaction. Conclusion The association between depression and a low treatment preference fit suggests that depression may pose challenges to SDM and that doctors in Japan are less attuned to the SDM preferences of depressed patients. Funding Janssen Pharmaceutical KK. Depression (dpeaa)DE-He213 Japan (dpeaa)DE-He213 Patient satisfaction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Rheumatoid arthritis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Shared decision-making (dpeaa)DE-He213 Treatment preference fit (dpeaa)DE-He213 Schaede, Ulrike verfasserin aut Sruamsiri, Rosarin verfasserin aut Enthalten in Rheumatology and therapy Springer Healthcare, 2014 6(2019), 2 vom: 02. Mai, Seite 269-283 (DE-627)795566832 (DE-600)2783278-8 2198-6584 nnns volume:6 year:2019 number:2 day:02 month:05 pages:269-283 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4 X:SPRINGER Resolving-System kostenfrei Volltext SYSFLAG_0 GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 6 2019 2 02 05 269-283
allfieldsGer	10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4 doi (DE-627)SPR037213385 (SPR)s40744-019-0156-4-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ Mahlich, Jörg verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-1110-2793 aut Shared Decision-Making and Patient Satisfaction in Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A New “Preference Fit” Framework for Treatment Assessment 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2019 Introduction We have developed a new framework to assess shared decision-making (SDM) as a tool to improve patient satisfaction. This framework is based on a “preference fit” index that relates SDM to patient treatment preferences and patient satisfaction in a sample of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in Japan. Methods We surveyed 500 RA patients in Japan and explored the interactions between the treatment preference fit index, SDM, and overall patient satisfaction. Results Our new preference fit index reveals significant impact on patient satisfaction: the better the fit between SDM and patient preferences, the higher the patient satisfaction with the current treatment. Patients treated with biologic agents were more satisfied. Patients suffering from depression or migraines scored significantly lower both on our preference fit measure and for overall patient satisfaction. Conclusion The association between depression and a low treatment preference fit suggests that depression may pose challenges to SDM and that doctors in Japan are less attuned to the SDM preferences of depressed patients. Funding Janssen Pharmaceutical KK. Depression (dpeaa)DE-He213 Japan (dpeaa)DE-He213 Patient satisfaction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Rheumatoid arthritis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Shared decision-making (dpeaa)DE-He213 Treatment preference fit (dpeaa)DE-He213 Schaede, Ulrike verfasserin aut Sruamsiri, Rosarin verfasserin aut Enthalten in Rheumatology and therapy Springer Healthcare, 2014 6(2019), 2 vom: 02. Mai, Seite 269-283 (DE-627)795566832 (DE-600)2783278-8 2198-6584 nnns volume:6 year:2019 number:2 day:02 month:05 pages:269-283 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4 X:SPRINGER Resolving-System kostenfrei Volltext SYSFLAG_0 GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 6 2019 2 02 05 269-283
allfieldsSound	10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4 doi (DE-627)SPR037213385 (SPR)s40744-019-0156-4-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ Mahlich, Jörg verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-1110-2793 aut Shared Decision-Making and Patient Satisfaction in Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A New “Preference Fit” Framework for Treatment Assessment 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2019 Introduction We have developed a new framework to assess shared decision-making (SDM) as a tool to improve patient satisfaction. This framework is based on a “preference fit” index that relates SDM to patient treatment preferences and patient satisfaction in a sample of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in Japan. Methods We surveyed 500 RA patients in Japan and explored the interactions between the treatment preference fit index, SDM, and overall patient satisfaction. Results Our new preference fit index reveals significant impact on patient satisfaction: the better the fit between SDM and patient preferences, the higher the patient satisfaction with the current treatment. Patients treated with biologic agents were more satisfied. Patients suffering from depression or migraines scored significantly lower both on our preference fit measure and for overall patient satisfaction. Conclusion The association between depression and a low treatment preference fit suggests that depression may pose challenges to SDM and that doctors in Japan are less attuned to the SDM preferences of depressed patients. Funding Janssen Pharmaceutical KK. Depression (dpeaa)DE-He213 Japan (dpeaa)DE-He213 Patient satisfaction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Rheumatoid arthritis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Shared decision-making (dpeaa)DE-He213 Treatment preference fit (dpeaa)DE-He213 Schaede, Ulrike verfasserin aut Sruamsiri, Rosarin verfasserin aut Enthalten in Rheumatology and therapy Springer Healthcare, 2014 6(2019), 2 vom: 02. Mai, Seite 269-283 (DE-627)795566832 (DE-600)2783278-8 2198-6584 nnns volume:6 year:2019 number:2 day:02 month:05 pages:269-283 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4 X:SPRINGER Resolving-System kostenfrei Volltext SYSFLAG_0 GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 6 2019 2 02 05 269-283
language	English
source	Enthalten in Rheumatology and therapy 6(2019), 2 vom: 02. Mai, Seite 269-283 volume:6 year:2019 number:2 day:02 month:05 pages:269-283
sourceStr	Enthalten in Rheumatology and therapy 6(2019), 2 vom: 02. Mai, Seite 269-283 volume:6 year:2019 number:2 day:02 month:05 pages:269-283
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Depression Japan Patient satisfaction Rheumatoid arthritis Shared decision-making Treatment preference fit
dewey-raw	610
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Rheumatology and therapy
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Mahlich, Jörg @@aut@@ Schaede, Ulrike @@aut@@ Sruamsiri, Rosarin @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2019-05-02T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	795566832
dewey-sort	3610
id	SPR037213385
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR037213385</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240824064906.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR037213385</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s40744-019-0156-4-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mahlich, Jörg</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-1110-2793</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Shared Decision-Making and Patient Satisfaction in Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A New “Preference Fit” Framework for Treatment Assessment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction We have developed a new framework to assess shared decision-making (SDM) as a tool to improve patient satisfaction. This framework is based on a “preference fit” index that relates SDM to patient treatment preferences and patient satisfaction in a sample of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in Japan. Methods We surveyed 500 RA patients in Japan and explored the interactions between the treatment preference fit index, SDM, and overall patient satisfaction. Results Our new preference fit index reveals significant impact on patient satisfaction: the better the fit between SDM and patient preferences, the higher the patient satisfaction with the current treatment. Patients treated with biologic agents were more satisfied. Patients suffering from depression or migraines scored significantly lower both on our preference fit measure and for overall patient satisfaction. Conclusion The association between depression and a low treatment preference fit suggests that depression may pose challenges to SDM and that doctors in Japan are less attuned to the SDM preferences of depressed patients. Funding Janssen Pharmaceutical KK.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Depression</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Japan</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Patient satisfaction</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Rheumatoid arthritis</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Shared decision-making</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Treatment preference fit</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schaede, Ulrike</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sruamsiri, Rosarin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Rheumatology and therapy</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Healthcare, 2014</subfield><subfield code="g">6(2019), 2 vom: 02. Mai, Seite 269-283</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)795566832</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2783278-8</subfield><subfield code="x">2198-6584</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:6</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:02</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:269-283</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4</subfield><subfield code="m">X:SPRINGER</subfield><subfield code="x">Resolving-System</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">6</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">02</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">269-283</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Mahlich, Jörg
spellingShingle	Mahlich, Jörg ddc 610 misc Depression misc Japan misc Patient satisfaction misc Rheumatoid arthritis misc Shared decision-making misc Treatment preference fit Shared Decision-Making and Patient Satisfaction in Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A New “Preference Fit” Framework for Treatment Assessment
authorStr	Mahlich, Jörg
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)795566832
format	electronic Article
dewey-ones	610 - Medicine & health
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut
collection	springer
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	2198-6584
topic_title	610 VZ Shared Decision-Making and Patient Satisfaction in Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A New “Preference Fit” Framework for Treatment Assessment Depression (dpeaa)DE-He213 Japan (dpeaa)DE-He213 Patient satisfaction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Rheumatoid arthritis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Shared decision-making (dpeaa)DE-He213 Treatment preference fit (dpeaa)DE-He213
topic	ddc 610 misc Depression misc Japan misc Patient satisfaction misc Rheumatoid arthritis misc Shared decision-making misc Treatment preference fit
topic_unstemmed	ddc 610 misc Depression misc Japan misc Patient satisfaction misc Rheumatoid arthritis misc Shared decision-making misc Treatment preference fit
topic_browse	ddc 610 misc Depression misc Japan misc Patient satisfaction misc Rheumatoid arthritis misc Shared decision-making misc Treatment preference fit
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Rheumatology and therapy
hierarchy_parent_id	795566832
dewey-tens	610 - Medicine & health
hierarchy_top_title	Rheumatology and therapy
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)795566832 (DE-600)2783278-8
title	Shared Decision-Making and Patient Satisfaction in Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A New “Preference Fit” Framework for Treatment Assessment
ctrlnum	(DE-627)SPR037213385 (SPR)s40744-019-0156-4-e
title_full	Shared Decision-Making and Patient Satisfaction in Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A New “Preference Fit” Framework for Treatment Assessment
author_sort	Mahlich, Jörg
journal	Rheumatology and therapy
journalStr	Rheumatology and therapy
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
dewey-hundreds	600 - Technology
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2019
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	269
author_browse	Mahlich, Jörg Schaede, Ulrike Sruamsiri, Rosarin
container_volume	6
class	610 VZ
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Mahlich, Jörg
doi_str_mv	10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4
normlink	(ORCID)0000-0003-1110-2793
normlink_prefix_str_mv	(orcid)0000-0003-1110-2793
dewey-full	610
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	shared decision-making and patient satisfaction in japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients: a new “preference fit” framework for treatment assessment
title_auth	Shared Decision-Making and Patient Satisfaction in Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A New “Preference Fit” Framework for Treatment Assessment
abstract	Introduction We have developed a new framework to assess shared decision-making (SDM) as a tool to improve patient satisfaction. This framework is based on a “preference fit” index that relates SDM to patient treatment preferences and patient satisfaction in a sample of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in Japan. Methods We surveyed 500 RA patients in Japan and explored the interactions between the treatment preference fit index, SDM, and overall patient satisfaction. Results Our new preference fit index reveals significant impact on patient satisfaction: the better the fit between SDM and patient preferences, the higher the patient satisfaction with the current treatment. Patients treated with biologic agents were more satisfied. Patients suffering from depression or migraines scored significantly lower both on our preference fit measure and for overall patient satisfaction. Conclusion The association between depression and a low treatment preference fit suggests that depression may pose challenges to SDM and that doctors in Japan are less attuned to the SDM preferences of depressed patients. Funding Janssen Pharmaceutical KK. © The Author(s) 2019
abstractGer	Introduction We have developed a new framework to assess shared decision-making (SDM) as a tool to improve patient satisfaction. This framework is based on a “preference fit” index that relates SDM to patient treatment preferences and patient satisfaction in a sample of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in Japan. Methods We surveyed 500 RA patients in Japan and explored the interactions between the treatment preference fit index, SDM, and overall patient satisfaction. Results Our new preference fit index reveals significant impact on patient satisfaction: the better the fit between SDM and patient preferences, the higher the patient satisfaction with the current treatment. Patients treated with biologic agents were more satisfied. Patients suffering from depression or migraines scored significantly lower both on our preference fit measure and for overall patient satisfaction. Conclusion The association between depression and a low treatment preference fit suggests that depression may pose challenges to SDM and that doctors in Japan are less attuned to the SDM preferences of depressed patients. Funding Janssen Pharmaceutical KK. © The Author(s) 2019
abstract_unstemmed	Introduction We have developed a new framework to assess shared decision-making (SDM) as a tool to improve patient satisfaction. This framework is based on a “preference fit” index that relates SDM to patient treatment preferences and patient satisfaction in a sample of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in Japan. Methods We surveyed 500 RA patients in Japan and explored the interactions between the treatment preference fit index, SDM, and overall patient satisfaction. Results Our new preference fit index reveals significant impact on patient satisfaction: the better the fit between SDM and patient preferences, the higher the patient satisfaction with the current treatment. Patients treated with biologic agents were more satisfied. Patients suffering from depression or migraines scored significantly lower both on our preference fit measure and for overall patient satisfaction. Conclusion The association between depression and a low treatment preference fit suggests that depression may pose challenges to SDM and that doctors in Japan are less attuned to the SDM preferences of depressed patients. Funding Janssen Pharmaceutical KK. © The Author(s) 2019
collection_details	SYSFLAG_0 GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	2
title_short	Shared Decision-Making and Patient Satisfaction in Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A New “Preference Fit” Framework for Treatment Assessment
url	https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4
remote_bool	true
author2	Schaede, Ulrike Sruamsiri, Rosarin
author2Str	Schaede, Ulrike Sruamsiri, Rosarin
ppnlink	795566832
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4
up_date	2024-08-24T04:51:05.180Z
_version_	1808243165948280832
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR037213385</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240824064906.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR037213385</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s40744-019-0156-4-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mahlich, Jörg</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-1110-2793</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Shared Decision-Making and Patient Satisfaction in Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A New “Preference Fit” Framework for Treatment Assessment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction We have developed a new framework to assess shared decision-making (SDM) as a tool to improve patient satisfaction. This framework is based on a “preference fit” index that relates SDM to patient treatment preferences and patient satisfaction in a sample of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in Japan. Methods We surveyed 500 RA patients in Japan and explored the interactions between the treatment preference fit index, SDM, and overall patient satisfaction. Results Our new preference fit index reveals significant impact on patient satisfaction: the better the fit between SDM and patient preferences, the higher the patient satisfaction with the current treatment. Patients treated with biologic agents were more satisfied. Patients suffering from depression or migraines scored significantly lower both on our preference fit measure and for overall patient satisfaction. Conclusion The association between depression and a low treatment preference fit suggests that depression may pose challenges to SDM and that doctors in Japan are less attuned to the SDM preferences of depressed patients. Funding Janssen Pharmaceutical KK.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Depression</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Japan</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Patient satisfaction</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Rheumatoid arthritis</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Shared decision-making</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Treatment preference fit</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schaede, Ulrike</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sruamsiri, Rosarin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Rheumatology and therapy</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Healthcare, 2014</subfield><subfield code="g">6(2019), 2 vom: 02. Mai, Seite 269-283</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)795566832</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2783278-8</subfield><subfield code="x">2198-6584</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:6</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:02</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:269-283</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4</subfield><subfield code="m">X:SPRINGER</subfield><subfield code="x">Resolving-System</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">6</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">02</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">269-283</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.168334

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Shared Decision-Making and Patient Satisfaction in Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A New “Preference Fit” Framework for Treatment Assessment

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?