Shared Decision-Making and Patient Satisfaction in Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A New “Preference Fit” Framework for Treatment Assessment
Introduction We have developed a new framework to assess shared decision-making (SDM) as a tool to improve patient satisfaction. This framework is based on a “preference fit” index that relates SDM to patient treatment preferences and patient satisfaction in a sample of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) pat...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Mahlich, Jörg [verfasserIn] Schaede, Ulrike [verfasserIn] Sruamsiri, Rosarin [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2019 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Anmerkung: |
© The Author(s) 2019 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Rheumatology and therapy - Springer Healthcare, 2014, 6(2019), 2 vom: 02. Mai, Seite 269-283 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:6 ; year:2019 ; number:2 ; day:02 ; month:05 ; pages:269-283 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
SPR037213385 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | SPR037213385 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240824064906.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 201007s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)SPR037213385 | ||
035 | |a (SPR)s40744-019-0156-4-e | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
100 | 1 | |a Mahlich, Jörg |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0003-1110-2793 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Shared Decision-Making and Patient Satisfaction in Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A New “Preference Fit” Framework for Treatment Assessment |
264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © The Author(s) 2019 | ||
520 | |a Introduction We have developed a new framework to assess shared decision-making (SDM) as a tool to improve patient satisfaction. This framework is based on a “preference fit” index that relates SDM to patient treatment preferences and patient satisfaction in a sample of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in Japan. Methods We surveyed 500 RA patients in Japan and explored the interactions between the treatment preference fit index, SDM, and overall patient satisfaction. Results Our new preference fit index reveals significant impact on patient satisfaction: the better the fit between SDM and patient preferences, the higher the patient satisfaction with the current treatment. Patients treated with biologic agents were more satisfied. Patients suffering from depression or migraines scored significantly lower both on our preference fit measure and for overall patient satisfaction. Conclusion The association between depression and a low treatment preference fit suggests that depression may pose challenges to SDM and that doctors in Japan are less attuned to the SDM preferences of depressed patients. Funding Janssen Pharmaceutical KK. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Depression |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Japan |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Patient satisfaction |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Rheumatoid arthritis |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Shared decision-making |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Treatment preference fit |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
700 | 1 | |a Schaede, Ulrike |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Sruamsiri, Rosarin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Rheumatology and therapy |d Springer Healthcare, 2014 |g 6(2019), 2 vom: 02. Mai, Seite 269-283 |w (DE-627)795566832 |w (DE-600)2783278-8 |x 2198-6584 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:6 |g year:2019 |g number:2 |g day:02 |g month:05 |g pages:269-283 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4 |m X:SPRINGER |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
912 | |a SYSFLAG_0 | ||
912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 6 |j 2019 |e 2 |b 02 |c 05 |h 269-283 |
author_variant |
j m jm u s us r s rs |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:21986584:2019----::hrdeiinaignptetaifcinnaaeehuaodrhiiptetaepeeec |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2019 |
publishDate |
2019 |
allfields |
10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4 doi (DE-627)SPR037213385 (SPR)s40744-019-0156-4-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ Mahlich, Jörg verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-1110-2793 aut Shared Decision-Making and Patient Satisfaction in Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A New “Preference Fit” Framework for Treatment Assessment 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2019 Introduction We have developed a new framework to assess shared decision-making (SDM) as a tool to improve patient satisfaction. This framework is based on a “preference fit” index that relates SDM to patient treatment preferences and patient satisfaction in a sample of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in Japan. Methods We surveyed 500 RA patients in Japan and explored the interactions between the treatment preference fit index, SDM, and overall patient satisfaction. Results Our new preference fit index reveals significant impact on patient satisfaction: the better the fit between SDM and patient preferences, the higher the patient satisfaction with the current treatment. Patients treated with biologic agents were more satisfied. Patients suffering from depression or migraines scored significantly lower both on our preference fit measure and for overall patient satisfaction. Conclusion The association between depression and a low treatment preference fit suggests that depression may pose challenges to SDM and that doctors in Japan are less attuned to the SDM preferences of depressed patients. Funding Janssen Pharmaceutical KK. Depression (dpeaa)DE-He213 Japan (dpeaa)DE-He213 Patient satisfaction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Rheumatoid arthritis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Shared decision-making (dpeaa)DE-He213 Treatment preference fit (dpeaa)DE-He213 Schaede, Ulrike verfasserin aut Sruamsiri, Rosarin verfasserin aut Enthalten in Rheumatology and therapy Springer Healthcare, 2014 6(2019), 2 vom: 02. Mai, Seite 269-283 (DE-627)795566832 (DE-600)2783278-8 2198-6584 nnns volume:6 year:2019 number:2 day:02 month:05 pages:269-283 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4 X:SPRINGER Resolving-System kostenfrei Volltext SYSFLAG_0 GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 6 2019 2 02 05 269-283 |
spelling |
10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4 doi (DE-627)SPR037213385 (SPR)s40744-019-0156-4-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ Mahlich, Jörg verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-1110-2793 aut Shared Decision-Making and Patient Satisfaction in Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A New “Preference Fit” Framework for Treatment Assessment 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2019 Introduction We have developed a new framework to assess shared decision-making (SDM) as a tool to improve patient satisfaction. This framework is based on a “preference fit” index that relates SDM to patient treatment preferences and patient satisfaction in a sample of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in Japan. Methods We surveyed 500 RA patients in Japan and explored the interactions between the treatment preference fit index, SDM, and overall patient satisfaction. Results Our new preference fit index reveals significant impact on patient satisfaction: the better the fit between SDM and patient preferences, the higher the patient satisfaction with the current treatment. Patients treated with biologic agents were more satisfied. Patients suffering from depression or migraines scored significantly lower both on our preference fit measure and for overall patient satisfaction. Conclusion The association between depression and a low treatment preference fit suggests that depression may pose challenges to SDM and that doctors in Japan are less attuned to the SDM preferences of depressed patients. Funding Janssen Pharmaceutical KK. Depression (dpeaa)DE-He213 Japan (dpeaa)DE-He213 Patient satisfaction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Rheumatoid arthritis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Shared decision-making (dpeaa)DE-He213 Treatment preference fit (dpeaa)DE-He213 Schaede, Ulrike verfasserin aut Sruamsiri, Rosarin verfasserin aut Enthalten in Rheumatology and therapy Springer Healthcare, 2014 6(2019), 2 vom: 02. Mai, Seite 269-283 (DE-627)795566832 (DE-600)2783278-8 2198-6584 nnns volume:6 year:2019 number:2 day:02 month:05 pages:269-283 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4 X:SPRINGER Resolving-System kostenfrei Volltext SYSFLAG_0 GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 6 2019 2 02 05 269-283 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4 doi (DE-627)SPR037213385 (SPR)s40744-019-0156-4-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ Mahlich, Jörg verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-1110-2793 aut Shared Decision-Making and Patient Satisfaction in Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A New “Preference Fit” Framework for Treatment Assessment 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2019 Introduction We have developed a new framework to assess shared decision-making (SDM) as a tool to improve patient satisfaction. This framework is based on a “preference fit” index that relates SDM to patient treatment preferences and patient satisfaction in a sample of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in Japan. Methods We surveyed 500 RA patients in Japan and explored the interactions between the treatment preference fit index, SDM, and overall patient satisfaction. Results Our new preference fit index reveals significant impact on patient satisfaction: the better the fit between SDM and patient preferences, the higher the patient satisfaction with the current treatment. Patients treated with biologic agents were more satisfied. Patients suffering from depression or migraines scored significantly lower both on our preference fit measure and for overall patient satisfaction. Conclusion The association between depression and a low treatment preference fit suggests that depression may pose challenges to SDM and that doctors in Japan are less attuned to the SDM preferences of depressed patients. Funding Janssen Pharmaceutical KK. Depression (dpeaa)DE-He213 Japan (dpeaa)DE-He213 Patient satisfaction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Rheumatoid arthritis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Shared decision-making (dpeaa)DE-He213 Treatment preference fit (dpeaa)DE-He213 Schaede, Ulrike verfasserin aut Sruamsiri, Rosarin verfasserin aut Enthalten in Rheumatology and therapy Springer Healthcare, 2014 6(2019), 2 vom: 02. Mai, Seite 269-283 (DE-627)795566832 (DE-600)2783278-8 2198-6584 nnns volume:6 year:2019 number:2 day:02 month:05 pages:269-283 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4 X:SPRINGER Resolving-System kostenfrei Volltext SYSFLAG_0 GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 6 2019 2 02 05 269-283 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4 doi (DE-627)SPR037213385 (SPR)s40744-019-0156-4-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ Mahlich, Jörg verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-1110-2793 aut Shared Decision-Making and Patient Satisfaction in Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A New “Preference Fit” Framework for Treatment Assessment 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2019 Introduction We have developed a new framework to assess shared decision-making (SDM) as a tool to improve patient satisfaction. This framework is based on a “preference fit” index that relates SDM to patient treatment preferences and patient satisfaction in a sample of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in Japan. Methods We surveyed 500 RA patients in Japan and explored the interactions between the treatment preference fit index, SDM, and overall patient satisfaction. Results Our new preference fit index reveals significant impact on patient satisfaction: the better the fit between SDM and patient preferences, the higher the patient satisfaction with the current treatment. Patients treated with biologic agents were more satisfied. Patients suffering from depression or migraines scored significantly lower both on our preference fit measure and for overall patient satisfaction. Conclusion The association between depression and a low treatment preference fit suggests that depression may pose challenges to SDM and that doctors in Japan are less attuned to the SDM preferences of depressed patients. Funding Janssen Pharmaceutical KK. Depression (dpeaa)DE-He213 Japan (dpeaa)DE-He213 Patient satisfaction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Rheumatoid arthritis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Shared decision-making (dpeaa)DE-He213 Treatment preference fit (dpeaa)DE-He213 Schaede, Ulrike verfasserin aut Sruamsiri, Rosarin verfasserin aut Enthalten in Rheumatology and therapy Springer Healthcare, 2014 6(2019), 2 vom: 02. Mai, Seite 269-283 (DE-627)795566832 (DE-600)2783278-8 2198-6584 nnns volume:6 year:2019 number:2 day:02 month:05 pages:269-283 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4 X:SPRINGER Resolving-System kostenfrei Volltext SYSFLAG_0 GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 6 2019 2 02 05 269-283 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4 doi (DE-627)SPR037213385 (SPR)s40744-019-0156-4-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ Mahlich, Jörg verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-1110-2793 aut Shared Decision-Making and Patient Satisfaction in Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A New “Preference Fit” Framework for Treatment Assessment 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2019 Introduction We have developed a new framework to assess shared decision-making (SDM) as a tool to improve patient satisfaction. This framework is based on a “preference fit” index that relates SDM to patient treatment preferences and patient satisfaction in a sample of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in Japan. Methods We surveyed 500 RA patients in Japan and explored the interactions between the treatment preference fit index, SDM, and overall patient satisfaction. Results Our new preference fit index reveals significant impact on patient satisfaction: the better the fit between SDM and patient preferences, the higher the patient satisfaction with the current treatment. Patients treated with biologic agents were more satisfied. Patients suffering from depression or migraines scored significantly lower both on our preference fit measure and for overall patient satisfaction. Conclusion The association between depression and a low treatment preference fit suggests that depression may pose challenges to SDM and that doctors in Japan are less attuned to the SDM preferences of depressed patients. Funding Janssen Pharmaceutical KK. Depression (dpeaa)DE-He213 Japan (dpeaa)DE-He213 Patient satisfaction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Rheumatoid arthritis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Shared decision-making (dpeaa)DE-He213 Treatment preference fit (dpeaa)DE-He213 Schaede, Ulrike verfasserin aut Sruamsiri, Rosarin verfasserin aut Enthalten in Rheumatology and therapy Springer Healthcare, 2014 6(2019), 2 vom: 02. Mai, Seite 269-283 (DE-627)795566832 (DE-600)2783278-8 2198-6584 nnns volume:6 year:2019 number:2 day:02 month:05 pages:269-283 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4 X:SPRINGER Resolving-System kostenfrei Volltext SYSFLAG_0 GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 6 2019 2 02 05 269-283 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Rheumatology and therapy 6(2019), 2 vom: 02. Mai, Seite 269-283 volume:6 year:2019 number:2 day:02 month:05 pages:269-283 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Rheumatology and therapy 6(2019), 2 vom: 02. Mai, Seite 269-283 volume:6 year:2019 number:2 day:02 month:05 pages:269-283 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Depression Japan Patient satisfaction Rheumatoid arthritis Shared decision-making Treatment preference fit |
dewey-raw |
610 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Rheumatology and therapy |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Mahlich, Jörg @@aut@@ Schaede, Ulrike @@aut@@ Sruamsiri, Rosarin @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2019-05-02T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
795566832 |
dewey-sort |
3610 |
id |
SPR037213385 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR037213385</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240824064906.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR037213385</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s40744-019-0156-4-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mahlich, Jörg</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-1110-2793</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Shared Decision-Making and Patient Satisfaction in Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A New “Preference Fit” Framework for Treatment Assessment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction We have developed a new framework to assess shared decision-making (SDM) as a tool to improve patient satisfaction. This framework is based on a “preference fit” index that relates SDM to patient treatment preferences and patient satisfaction in a sample of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in Japan. Methods We surveyed 500 RA patients in Japan and explored the interactions between the treatment preference fit index, SDM, and overall patient satisfaction. Results Our new preference fit index reveals significant impact on patient satisfaction: the better the fit between SDM and patient preferences, the higher the patient satisfaction with the current treatment. Patients treated with biologic agents were more satisfied. Patients suffering from depression or migraines scored significantly lower both on our preference fit measure and for overall patient satisfaction. Conclusion The association between depression and a low treatment preference fit suggests that depression may pose challenges to SDM and that doctors in Japan are less attuned to the SDM preferences of depressed patients. Funding Janssen Pharmaceutical KK.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Depression</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Japan</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Patient satisfaction</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Rheumatoid arthritis</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Shared decision-making</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Treatment preference fit</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schaede, Ulrike</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sruamsiri, Rosarin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Rheumatology and therapy</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Healthcare, 2014</subfield><subfield code="g">6(2019), 2 vom: 02. Mai, Seite 269-283</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)795566832</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2783278-8</subfield><subfield code="x">2198-6584</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:6</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:02</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:269-283</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4</subfield><subfield code="m">X:SPRINGER</subfield><subfield code="x">Resolving-System</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">6</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">02</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">269-283</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Mahlich, Jörg |
spellingShingle |
Mahlich, Jörg ddc 610 misc Depression misc Japan misc Patient satisfaction misc Rheumatoid arthritis misc Shared decision-making misc Treatment preference fit Shared Decision-Making and Patient Satisfaction in Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A New “Preference Fit” Framework for Treatment Assessment |
authorStr |
Mahlich, Jörg |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)795566832 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
610 - Medicine & health |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut |
collection |
springer |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
2198-6584 |
topic_title |
610 VZ Shared Decision-Making and Patient Satisfaction in Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A New “Preference Fit” Framework for Treatment Assessment Depression (dpeaa)DE-He213 Japan (dpeaa)DE-He213 Patient satisfaction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Rheumatoid arthritis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Shared decision-making (dpeaa)DE-He213 Treatment preference fit (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
topic |
ddc 610 misc Depression misc Japan misc Patient satisfaction misc Rheumatoid arthritis misc Shared decision-making misc Treatment preference fit |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 610 misc Depression misc Japan misc Patient satisfaction misc Rheumatoid arthritis misc Shared decision-making misc Treatment preference fit |
topic_browse |
ddc 610 misc Depression misc Japan misc Patient satisfaction misc Rheumatoid arthritis misc Shared decision-making misc Treatment preference fit |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Rheumatology and therapy |
hierarchy_parent_id |
795566832 |
dewey-tens |
610 - Medicine & health |
hierarchy_top_title |
Rheumatology and therapy |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)795566832 (DE-600)2783278-8 |
title |
Shared Decision-Making and Patient Satisfaction in Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A New “Preference Fit” Framework for Treatment Assessment |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR037213385 (SPR)s40744-019-0156-4-e |
title_full |
Shared Decision-Making and Patient Satisfaction in Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A New “Preference Fit” Framework for Treatment Assessment |
author_sort |
Mahlich, Jörg |
journal |
Rheumatology and therapy |
journalStr |
Rheumatology and therapy |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2019 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
269 |
author_browse |
Mahlich, Jörg Schaede, Ulrike Sruamsiri, Rosarin |
container_volume |
6 |
class |
610 VZ |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Mahlich, Jörg |
doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4 |
normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0003-1110-2793 |
normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0003-1110-2793 |
dewey-full |
610 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
shared decision-making and patient satisfaction in japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients: a new “preference fit” framework for treatment assessment |
title_auth |
Shared Decision-Making and Patient Satisfaction in Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A New “Preference Fit” Framework for Treatment Assessment |
abstract |
Introduction We have developed a new framework to assess shared decision-making (SDM) as a tool to improve patient satisfaction. This framework is based on a “preference fit” index that relates SDM to patient treatment preferences and patient satisfaction in a sample of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in Japan. Methods We surveyed 500 RA patients in Japan and explored the interactions between the treatment preference fit index, SDM, and overall patient satisfaction. Results Our new preference fit index reveals significant impact on patient satisfaction: the better the fit between SDM and patient preferences, the higher the patient satisfaction with the current treatment. Patients treated with biologic agents were more satisfied. Patients suffering from depression or migraines scored significantly lower both on our preference fit measure and for overall patient satisfaction. Conclusion The association between depression and a low treatment preference fit suggests that depression may pose challenges to SDM and that doctors in Japan are less attuned to the SDM preferences of depressed patients. Funding Janssen Pharmaceutical KK. © The Author(s) 2019 |
abstractGer |
Introduction We have developed a new framework to assess shared decision-making (SDM) as a tool to improve patient satisfaction. This framework is based on a “preference fit” index that relates SDM to patient treatment preferences and patient satisfaction in a sample of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in Japan. Methods We surveyed 500 RA patients in Japan and explored the interactions between the treatment preference fit index, SDM, and overall patient satisfaction. Results Our new preference fit index reveals significant impact on patient satisfaction: the better the fit between SDM and patient preferences, the higher the patient satisfaction with the current treatment. Patients treated with biologic agents were more satisfied. Patients suffering from depression or migraines scored significantly lower both on our preference fit measure and for overall patient satisfaction. Conclusion The association between depression and a low treatment preference fit suggests that depression may pose challenges to SDM and that doctors in Japan are less attuned to the SDM preferences of depressed patients. Funding Janssen Pharmaceutical KK. © The Author(s) 2019 |
abstract_unstemmed |
Introduction We have developed a new framework to assess shared decision-making (SDM) as a tool to improve patient satisfaction. This framework is based on a “preference fit” index that relates SDM to patient treatment preferences and patient satisfaction in a sample of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in Japan. Methods We surveyed 500 RA patients in Japan and explored the interactions between the treatment preference fit index, SDM, and overall patient satisfaction. Results Our new preference fit index reveals significant impact on patient satisfaction: the better the fit between SDM and patient preferences, the higher the patient satisfaction with the current treatment. Patients treated with biologic agents were more satisfied. Patients suffering from depression or migraines scored significantly lower both on our preference fit measure and for overall patient satisfaction. Conclusion The association between depression and a low treatment preference fit suggests that depression may pose challenges to SDM and that doctors in Japan are less attuned to the SDM preferences of depressed patients. Funding Janssen Pharmaceutical KK. © The Author(s) 2019 |
collection_details |
SYSFLAG_0 GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
2 |
title_short |
Shared Decision-Making and Patient Satisfaction in Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A New “Preference Fit” Framework for Treatment Assessment |
url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Schaede, Ulrike Sruamsiri, Rosarin |
author2Str |
Schaede, Ulrike Sruamsiri, Rosarin |
ppnlink |
795566832 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4 |
up_date |
2024-08-24T04:51:05.180Z |
_version_ |
1808243165948280832 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR037213385</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240824064906.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR037213385</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s40744-019-0156-4-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mahlich, Jörg</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-1110-2793</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Shared Decision-Making and Patient Satisfaction in Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A New “Preference Fit” Framework for Treatment Assessment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction We have developed a new framework to assess shared decision-making (SDM) as a tool to improve patient satisfaction. This framework is based on a “preference fit” index that relates SDM to patient treatment preferences and patient satisfaction in a sample of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in Japan. Methods We surveyed 500 RA patients in Japan and explored the interactions between the treatment preference fit index, SDM, and overall patient satisfaction. Results Our new preference fit index reveals significant impact on patient satisfaction: the better the fit between SDM and patient preferences, the higher the patient satisfaction with the current treatment. Patients treated with biologic agents were more satisfied. Patients suffering from depression or migraines scored significantly lower both on our preference fit measure and for overall patient satisfaction. Conclusion The association between depression and a low treatment preference fit suggests that depression may pose challenges to SDM and that doctors in Japan are less attuned to the SDM preferences of depressed patients. Funding Janssen Pharmaceutical KK.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Depression</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Japan</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Patient satisfaction</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Rheumatoid arthritis</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Shared decision-making</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Treatment preference fit</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schaede, Ulrike</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sruamsiri, Rosarin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Rheumatology and therapy</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Healthcare, 2014</subfield><subfield code="g">6(2019), 2 vom: 02. Mai, Seite 269-283</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)795566832</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2783278-8</subfield><subfield code="x">2198-6584</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:6</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:02</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:269-283</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-019-0156-4</subfield><subfield code="m">X:SPRINGER</subfield><subfield code="x">Resolving-System</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">6</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">02</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">269-283</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.168334 |