3D numerical prediction of failure behaviour for the straight and curved parts of retaining wall according to various heights
Abstract Reinforced soil retaining walls are widely used for road and railway construction, various types of embankment, housing and industrial development, etc. with good safety and economic efficiency, and the number of studies on reinforced soil retaining walls has steadily increased. However, mo...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Kong, Suk-Min [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2018 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Anmerkung: |
© The Author(s) 2018 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: International journal of geo-engineering - Berlin : Springer, 2014, 9(2018), 1 vom: 13. Dez. |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:9 ; year:2018 ; number:1 ; day:13 ; month:12 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1186/s40703-018-0091-1 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
SPR037831097 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | SPR037831097 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230328182735.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 201007s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s40703-018-0091-1 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)SPR037831097 | ||
035 | |a (SPR)s40703-018-0091-1-e | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Kong, Suk-Min |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a 3D numerical prediction of failure behaviour for the straight and curved parts of retaining wall according to various heights |
264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © The Author(s) 2018 | ||
520 | |a Abstract Reinforced soil retaining walls are widely used for road and railway construction, various types of embankment, housing and industrial development, etc. with good safety and economic efficiency, and the number of studies on reinforced soil retaining walls has steadily increased. However, most research on reinforced soil retaining walls focus on two-dimensional linear parts. The behaviour of curved parts in reinforced soil retaining wall is questionable, and collapse of that also occurs frequently. Therefore, in this study, reinforced soil retaining walls were modelled by stacking blocks of 0.4 × 0.5 × 0.4 m (length × width × height), and the retaining walls were divided into four cases (heights of 3.2, 5.2, 7.2, 9.2 m). The failure behavior of the straight parts and the curved parts were compared, depending on the height. Based on the height of the reinforced soil retaining wall, the failure behaviours of the curved parts and straight parts of the reinforced soil retaining wall were predicted through 3D numerical analysis. This study aims to raise the necessity of research on the curved parts. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Reinforced soil retaining wall |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Height |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Straight parts |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Curved parts |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Failure behaviour |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a 3D numerical |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
700 | 1 | |a Lee, Jong-Hyun |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Jung, Hyuk-Sang |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Lee, Yong-Joo |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal of geo-engineering |d Berlin : Springer, 2014 |g 9(2018), 1 vom: 13. Dez. |w (DE-627)823091775 |w (DE-600)2818309-5 |x 2198-2783 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:9 |g year:2018 |g number:1 |g day:13 |g month:12 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40703-018-0091-1 |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 9 |j 2018 |e 1 |b 13 |c 12 |
author_variant |
s m k smk j h l jhl h s j hsj y j l yjl |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:21982783:2018----::dueiapeitoofiueeaiufrhsrihaduvdatortiig |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2018 |
publishDate |
2018 |
allfields |
10.1186/s40703-018-0091-1 doi (DE-627)SPR037831097 (SPR)s40703-018-0091-1-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kong, Suk-Min verfasserin aut 3D numerical prediction of failure behaviour for the straight and curved parts of retaining wall according to various heights 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2018 Abstract Reinforced soil retaining walls are widely used for road and railway construction, various types of embankment, housing and industrial development, etc. with good safety and economic efficiency, and the number of studies on reinforced soil retaining walls has steadily increased. However, most research on reinforced soil retaining walls focus on two-dimensional linear parts. The behaviour of curved parts in reinforced soil retaining wall is questionable, and collapse of that also occurs frequently. Therefore, in this study, reinforced soil retaining walls were modelled by stacking blocks of 0.4 × 0.5 × 0.4 m (length × width × height), and the retaining walls were divided into four cases (heights of 3.2, 5.2, 7.2, 9.2 m). The failure behavior of the straight parts and the curved parts were compared, depending on the height. Based on the height of the reinforced soil retaining wall, the failure behaviours of the curved parts and straight parts of the reinforced soil retaining wall were predicted through 3D numerical analysis. This study aims to raise the necessity of research on the curved parts. Reinforced soil retaining wall (dpeaa)DE-He213 Height (dpeaa)DE-He213 Straight parts (dpeaa)DE-He213 Curved parts (dpeaa)DE-He213 Failure behaviour (dpeaa)DE-He213 3D numerical (dpeaa)DE-He213 Lee, Jong-Hyun aut Jung, Hyuk-Sang aut Lee, Yong-Joo aut Enthalten in International journal of geo-engineering Berlin : Springer, 2014 9(2018), 1 vom: 13. Dez. (DE-627)823091775 (DE-600)2818309-5 2198-2783 nnns volume:9 year:2018 number:1 day:13 month:12 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40703-018-0091-1 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 9 2018 1 13 12 |
spelling |
10.1186/s40703-018-0091-1 doi (DE-627)SPR037831097 (SPR)s40703-018-0091-1-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kong, Suk-Min verfasserin aut 3D numerical prediction of failure behaviour for the straight and curved parts of retaining wall according to various heights 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2018 Abstract Reinforced soil retaining walls are widely used for road and railway construction, various types of embankment, housing and industrial development, etc. with good safety and economic efficiency, and the number of studies on reinforced soil retaining walls has steadily increased. However, most research on reinforced soil retaining walls focus on two-dimensional linear parts. The behaviour of curved parts in reinforced soil retaining wall is questionable, and collapse of that also occurs frequently. Therefore, in this study, reinforced soil retaining walls were modelled by stacking blocks of 0.4 × 0.5 × 0.4 m (length × width × height), and the retaining walls were divided into four cases (heights of 3.2, 5.2, 7.2, 9.2 m). The failure behavior of the straight parts and the curved parts were compared, depending on the height. Based on the height of the reinforced soil retaining wall, the failure behaviours of the curved parts and straight parts of the reinforced soil retaining wall were predicted through 3D numerical analysis. This study aims to raise the necessity of research on the curved parts. Reinforced soil retaining wall (dpeaa)DE-He213 Height (dpeaa)DE-He213 Straight parts (dpeaa)DE-He213 Curved parts (dpeaa)DE-He213 Failure behaviour (dpeaa)DE-He213 3D numerical (dpeaa)DE-He213 Lee, Jong-Hyun aut Jung, Hyuk-Sang aut Lee, Yong-Joo aut Enthalten in International journal of geo-engineering Berlin : Springer, 2014 9(2018), 1 vom: 13. Dez. (DE-627)823091775 (DE-600)2818309-5 2198-2783 nnns volume:9 year:2018 number:1 day:13 month:12 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40703-018-0091-1 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 9 2018 1 13 12 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1186/s40703-018-0091-1 doi (DE-627)SPR037831097 (SPR)s40703-018-0091-1-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kong, Suk-Min verfasserin aut 3D numerical prediction of failure behaviour for the straight and curved parts of retaining wall according to various heights 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2018 Abstract Reinforced soil retaining walls are widely used for road and railway construction, various types of embankment, housing and industrial development, etc. with good safety and economic efficiency, and the number of studies on reinforced soil retaining walls has steadily increased. However, most research on reinforced soil retaining walls focus on two-dimensional linear parts. The behaviour of curved parts in reinforced soil retaining wall is questionable, and collapse of that also occurs frequently. Therefore, in this study, reinforced soil retaining walls were modelled by stacking blocks of 0.4 × 0.5 × 0.4 m (length × width × height), and the retaining walls were divided into four cases (heights of 3.2, 5.2, 7.2, 9.2 m). The failure behavior of the straight parts and the curved parts were compared, depending on the height. Based on the height of the reinforced soil retaining wall, the failure behaviours of the curved parts and straight parts of the reinforced soil retaining wall were predicted through 3D numerical analysis. This study aims to raise the necessity of research on the curved parts. Reinforced soil retaining wall (dpeaa)DE-He213 Height (dpeaa)DE-He213 Straight parts (dpeaa)DE-He213 Curved parts (dpeaa)DE-He213 Failure behaviour (dpeaa)DE-He213 3D numerical (dpeaa)DE-He213 Lee, Jong-Hyun aut Jung, Hyuk-Sang aut Lee, Yong-Joo aut Enthalten in International journal of geo-engineering Berlin : Springer, 2014 9(2018), 1 vom: 13. Dez. (DE-627)823091775 (DE-600)2818309-5 2198-2783 nnns volume:9 year:2018 number:1 day:13 month:12 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40703-018-0091-1 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 9 2018 1 13 12 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1186/s40703-018-0091-1 doi (DE-627)SPR037831097 (SPR)s40703-018-0091-1-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kong, Suk-Min verfasserin aut 3D numerical prediction of failure behaviour for the straight and curved parts of retaining wall according to various heights 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2018 Abstract Reinforced soil retaining walls are widely used for road and railway construction, various types of embankment, housing and industrial development, etc. with good safety and economic efficiency, and the number of studies on reinforced soil retaining walls has steadily increased. However, most research on reinforced soil retaining walls focus on two-dimensional linear parts. The behaviour of curved parts in reinforced soil retaining wall is questionable, and collapse of that also occurs frequently. Therefore, in this study, reinforced soil retaining walls were modelled by stacking blocks of 0.4 × 0.5 × 0.4 m (length × width × height), and the retaining walls were divided into four cases (heights of 3.2, 5.2, 7.2, 9.2 m). The failure behavior of the straight parts and the curved parts were compared, depending on the height. Based on the height of the reinforced soil retaining wall, the failure behaviours of the curved parts and straight parts of the reinforced soil retaining wall were predicted through 3D numerical analysis. This study aims to raise the necessity of research on the curved parts. Reinforced soil retaining wall (dpeaa)DE-He213 Height (dpeaa)DE-He213 Straight parts (dpeaa)DE-He213 Curved parts (dpeaa)DE-He213 Failure behaviour (dpeaa)DE-He213 3D numerical (dpeaa)DE-He213 Lee, Jong-Hyun aut Jung, Hyuk-Sang aut Lee, Yong-Joo aut Enthalten in International journal of geo-engineering Berlin : Springer, 2014 9(2018), 1 vom: 13. Dez. (DE-627)823091775 (DE-600)2818309-5 2198-2783 nnns volume:9 year:2018 number:1 day:13 month:12 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40703-018-0091-1 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 9 2018 1 13 12 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1186/s40703-018-0091-1 doi (DE-627)SPR037831097 (SPR)s40703-018-0091-1-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kong, Suk-Min verfasserin aut 3D numerical prediction of failure behaviour for the straight and curved parts of retaining wall according to various heights 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2018 Abstract Reinforced soil retaining walls are widely used for road and railway construction, various types of embankment, housing and industrial development, etc. with good safety and economic efficiency, and the number of studies on reinforced soil retaining walls has steadily increased. However, most research on reinforced soil retaining walls focus on two-dimensional linear parts. The behaviour of curved parts in reinforced soil retaining wall is questionable, and collapse of that also occurs frequently. Therefore, in this study, reinforced soil retaining walls were modelled by stacking blocks of 0.4 × 0.5 × 0.4 m (length × width × height), and the retaining walls were divided into four cases (heights of 3.2, 5.2, 7.2, 9.2 m). The failure behavior of the straight parts and the curved parts were compared, depending on the height. Based on the height of the reinforced soil retaining wall, the failure behaviours of the curved parts and straight parts of the reinforced soil retaining wall were predicted through 3D numerical analysis. This study aims to raise the necessity of research on the curved parts. Reinforced soil retaining wall (dpeaa)DE-He213 Height (dpeaa)DE-He213 Straight parts (dpeaa)DE-He213 Curved parts (dpeaa)DE-He213 Failure behaviour (dpeaa)DE-He213 3D numerical (dpeaa)DE-He213 Lee, Jong-Hyun aut Jung, Hyuk-Sang aut Lee, Yong-Joo aut Enthalten in International journal of geo-engineering Berlin : Springer, 2014 9(2018), 1 vom: 13. Dez. (DE-627)823091775 (DE-600)2818309-5 2198-2783 nnns volume:9 year:2018 number:1 day:13 month:12 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40703-018-0091-1 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 9 2018 1 13 12 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in International journal of geo-engineering 9(2018), 1 vom: 13. Dez. volume:9 year:2018 number:1 day:13 month:12 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in International journal of geo-engineering 9(2018), 1 vom: 13. Dez. volume:9 year:2018 number:1 day:13 month:12 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Reinforced soil retaining wall Height Straight parts Curved parts Failure behaviour 3D numerical |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
International journal of geo-engineering |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Kong, Suk-Min @@aut@@ Lee, Jong-Hyun @@aut@@ Jung, Hyuk-Sang @@aut@@ Lee, Yong-Joo @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2018-12-13T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
823091775 |
id |
SPR037831097 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR037831097</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230328182735.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/s40703-018-0091-1</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR037831097</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s40703-018-0091-1-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kong, Suk-Min</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">3D numerical prediction of failure behaviour for the straight and curved parts of retaining wall according to various heights</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Reinforced soil retaining walls are widely used for road and railway construction, various types of embankment, housing and industrial development, etc. with good safety and economic efficiency, and the number of studies on reinforced soil retaining walls has steadily increased. However, most research on reinforced soil retaining walls focus on two-dimensional linear parts. The behaviour of curved parts in reinforced soil retaining wall is questionable, and collapse of that also occurs frequently. Therefore, in this study, reinforced soil retaining walls were modelled by stacking blocks of 0.4 × 0.5 × 0.4 m (length × width × height), and the retaining walls were divided into four cases (heights of 3.2, 5.2, 7.2, 9.2 m). The failure behavior of the straight parts and the curved parts were compared, depending on the height. Based on the height of the reinforced soil retaining wall, the failure behaviours of the curved parts and straight parts of the reinforced soil retaining wall were predicted through 3D numerical analysis. This study aims to raise the necessity of research on the curved parts.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Reinforced soil retaining wall</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Height</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Straight parts</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Curved parts</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Failure behaviour</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">3D numerical</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lee, Jong-Hyun</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jung, Hyuk-Sang</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lee, Yong-Joo</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">International journal of geo-engineering</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : Springer, 2014</subfield><subfield code="g">9(2018), 1 vom: 13. Dez.</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)823091775</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2818309-5</subfield><subfield code="x">2198-2783</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:9</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:13</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40703-018-0091-1</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">9</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">13</subfield><subfield code="c">12</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Kong, Suk-Min |
spellingShingle |
Kong, Suk-Min misc Reinforced soil retaining wall misc Height misc Straight parts misc Curved parts misc Failure behaviour misc 3D numerical 3D numerical prediction of failure behaviour for the straight and curved parts of retaining wall according to various heights |
authorStr |
Kong, Suk-Min |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)823091775 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut |
collection |
springer |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
2198-2783 |
topic_title |
3D numerical prediction of failure behaviour for the straight and curved parts of retaining wall according to various heights Reinforced soil retaining wall (dpeaa)DE-He213 Height (dpeaa)DE-He213 Straight parts (dpeaa)DE-He213 Curved parts (dpeaa)DE-He213 Failure behaviour (dpeaa)DE-He213 3D numerical (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
topic |
misc Reinforced soil retaining wall misc Height misc Straight parts misc Curved parts misc Failure behaviour misc 3D numerical |
topic_unstemmed |
misc Reinforced soil retaining wall misc Height misc Straight parts misc Curved parts misc Failure behaviour misc 3D numerical |
topic_browse |
misc Reinforced soil retaining wall misc Height misc Straight parts misc Curved parts misc Failure behaviour misc 3D numerical |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
International journal of geo-engineering |
hierarchy_parent_id |
823091775 |
hierarchy_top_title |
International journal of geo-engineering |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)823091775 (DE-600)2818309-5 |
title |
3D numerical prediction of failure behaviour for the straight and curved parts of retaining wall according to various heights |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR037831097 (SPR)s40703-018-0091-1-e |
title_full |
3D numerical prediction of failure behaviour for the straight and curved parts of retaining wall according to various heights |
author_sort |
Kong, Suk-Min |
journal |
International journal of geo-engineering |
journalStr |
International journal of geo-engineering |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2018 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
author_browse |
Kong, Suk-Min Lee, Jong-Hyun Jung, Hyuk-Sang Lee, Yong-Joo |
container_volume |
9 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Kong, Suk-Min |
doi_str_mv |
10.1186/s40703-018-0091-1 |
title_sort |
3d numerical prediction of failure behaviour for the straight and curved parts of retaining wall according to various heights |
title_auth |
3D numerical prediction of failure behaviour for the straight and curved parts of retaining wall according to various heights |
abstract |
Abstract Reinforced soil retaining walls are widely used for road and railway construction, various types of embankment, housing and industrial development, etc. with good safety and economic efficiency, and the number of studies on reinforced soil retaining walls has steadily increased. However, most research on reinforced soil retaining walls focus on two-dimensional linear parts. The behaviour of curved parts in reinforced soil retaining wall is questionable, and collapse of that also occurs frequently. Therefore, in this study, reinforced soil retaining walls were modelled by stacking blocks of 0.4 × 0.5 × 0.4 m (length × width × height), and the retaining walls were divided into four cases (heights of 3.2, 5.2, 7.2, 9.2 m). The failure behavior of the straight parts and the curved parts were compared, depending on the height. Based on the height of the reinforced soil retaining wall, the failure behaviours of the curved parts and straight parts of the reinforced soil retaining wall were predicted through 3D numerical analysis. This study aims to raise the necessity of research on the curved parts. © The Author(s) 2018 |
abstractGer |
Abstract Reinforced soil retaining walls are widely used for road and railway construction, various types of embankment, housing and industrial development, etc. with good safety and economic efficiency, and the number of studies on reinforced soil retaining walls has steadily increased. However, most research on reinforced soil retaining walls focus on two-dimensional linear parts. The behaviour of curved parts in reinforced soil retaining wall is questionable, and collapse of that also occurs frequently. Therefore, in this study, reinforced soil retaining walls were modelled by stacking blocks of 0.4 × 0.5 × 0.4 m (length × width × height), and the retaining walls were divided into four cases (heights of 3.2, 5.2, 7.2, 9.2 m). The failure behavior of the straight parts and the curved parts were compared, depending on the height. Based on the height of the reinforced soil retaining wall, the failure behaviours of the curved parts and straight parts of the reinforced soil retaining wall were predicted through 3D numerical analysis. This study aims to raise the necessity of research on the curved parts. © The Author(s) 2018 |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Reinforced soil retaining walls are widely used for road and railway construction, various types of embankment, housing and industrial development, etc. with good safety and economic efficiency, and the number of studies on reinforced soil retaining walls has steadily increased. However, most research on reinforced soil retaining walls focus on two-dimensional linear parts. The behaviour of curved parts in reinforced soil retaining wall is questionable, and collapse of that also occurs frequently. Therefore, in this study, reinforced soil retaining walls were modelled by stacking blocks of 0.4 × 0.5 × 0.4 m (length × width × height), and the retaining walls were divided into four cases (heights of 3.2, 5.2, 7.2, 9.2 m). The failure behavior of the straight parts and the curved parts were compared, depending on the height. Based on the height of the reinforced soil retaining wall, the failure behaviours of the curved parts and straight parts of the reinforced soil retaining wall were predicted through 3D numerical analysis. This study aims to raise the necessity of research on the curved parts. © The Author(s) 2018 |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
1 |
title_short |
3D numerical prediction of failure behaviour for the straight and curved parts of retaining wall according to various heights |
url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40703-018-0091-1 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Lee, Jong-Hyun Jung, Hyuk-Sang Lee, Yong-Joo |
author2Str |
Lee, Jong-Hyun Jung, Hyuk-Sang Lee, Yong-Joo |
ppnlink |
823091775 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1186/s40703-018-0091-1 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T14:35:11.444Z |
_version_ |
1803568872367849472 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR037831097</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230328182735.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/s40703-018-0091-1</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR037831097</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s40703-018-0091-1-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kong, Suk-Min</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">3D numerical prediction of failure behaviour for the straight and curved parts of retaining wall according to various heights</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Reinforced soil retaining walls are widely used for road and railway construction, various types of embankment, housing and industrial development, etc. with good safety and economic efficiency, and the number of studies on reinforced soil retaining walls has steadily increased. However, most research on reinforced soil retaining walls focus on two-dimensional linear parts. The behaviour of curved parts in reinforced soil retaining wall is questionable, and collapse of that also occurs frequently. Therefore, in this study, reinforced soil retaining walls were modelled by stacking blocks of 0.4 × 0.5 × 0.4 m (length × width × height), and the retaining walls were divided into four cases (heights of 3.2, 5.2, 7.2, 9.2 m). The failure behavior of the straight parts and the curved parts were compared, depending on the height. Based on the height of the reinforced soil retaining wall, the failure behaviours of the curved parts and straight parts of the reinforced soil retaining wall were predicted through 3D numerical analysis. This study aims to raise the necessity of research on the curved parts.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Reinforced soil retaining wall</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Height</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Straight parts</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Curved parts</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Failure behaviour</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">3D numerical</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lee, Jong-Hyun</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jung, Hyuk-Sang</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lee, Yong-Joo</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">International journal of geo-engineering</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : Springer, 2014</subfield><subfield code="g">9(2018), 1 vom: 13. Dez.</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)823091775</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2818309-5</subfield><subfield code="x">2198-2783</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:9</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:13</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40703-018-0091-1</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">9</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">13</subfield><subfield code="c">12</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3981476 |