Class structure and income inequality in transitional China
Abstract Integrating Kornai’s concept of coordination mechanism and Weber’s types of domination, the author argues that, based on the different property rights embedded within the state power structure, bureaucratic and market coordination define class positions in bureaucratic domination by virtue...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Liu, Xin [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: The Journal of Chinese Sociology - Heidelberg : Springer, 2014, 7(2020), 1 vom: 24. März |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:7 ; year:2020 ; number:1 ; day:24 ; month:03 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1186/s40711-020-00116-9 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR039197166 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR039197166 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20201126000936.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201007s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s40711-020-00116-9 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR039197166 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)s40711-020-00116-9-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Liu, Xin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Class structure and income inequality in transitional China |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Integrating Kornai’s concept of coordination mechanism and Weber’s types of domination, the author argues that, based on the different property rights embedded within the state power structure, bureaucratic and market coordination define class positions in bureaucratic domination by virtue of authority and in market domination by virtue of market capacity. Class relations are defined as relations of domination and economic interest distribution. A class framework composed of 16 class positions is constructed in terms of authority or market capacity in dual domination. The seven-class scheme generated by aggregation of the 16 class positions fits well with a four-cluster model estimated with latent class analysis of the 2010 CGSS, suggesting that the proposed framework is empirically relevant. The statistical findings also show that, compared to advanced industrialized societies, China has a larger proportion of command classes, a relatively equal share of new and old middle classes, and a smaller working class. China has significantly more farmers, especially in the central and western regions. The class structure is olive-shaped in the eastern region but “圭” (gui)-shaped in the central and western regions. The proposed class scheme can significantly predict income inequality, supporting the argument that class relations have the character of a “domination-interest duality.” | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Class structure |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Stratification |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Class framework |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Income inequality |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Latent class Analysis |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a China |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The Journal of Chinese Sociology |d Heidelberg : Springer, 2014 |g 7(2020), 1 vom: 24. März |w (DE-627)815914806 |w (DE-600)2806685-6 |x 2198-2635 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:7 |g year:2020 |g number:1 |g day:24 |g month:03 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40711-020-00116-9 |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 7 |j 2020 |e 1 |b 24 |c 03 | ||
| author_variant |
x l xl |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:21982635:2020----::lssrcuenicmieultita |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2020 |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| allfields |
10.1186/s40711-020-00116-9 doi (DE-627)SPR039197166 (SPR)s40711-020-00116-9-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Liu, Xin verfasserin aut Class structure and income inequality in transitional China 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Integrating Kornai’s concept of coordination mechanism and Weber’s types of domination, the author argues that, based on the different property rights embedded within the state power structure, bureaucratic and market coordination define class positions in bureaucratic domination by virtue of authority and in market domination by virtue of market capacity. Class relations are defined as relations of domination and economic interest distribution. A class framework composed of 16 class positions is constructed in terms of authority or market capacity in dual domination. The seven-class scheme generated by aggregation of the 16 class positions fits well with a four-cluster model estimated with latent class analysis of the 2010 CGSS, suggesting that the proposed framework is empirically relevant. The statistical findings also show that, compared to advanced industrialized societies, China has a larger proportion of command classes, a relatively equal share of new and old middle classes, and a smaller working class. China has significantly more farmers, especially in the central and western regions. The class structure is olive-shaped in the eastern region but “圭” (gui)-shaped in the central and western regions. The proposed class scheme can significantly predict income inequality, supporting the argument that class relations have the character of a “domination-interest duality.” Class structure (dpeaa)DE-He213 Stratification (dpeaa)DE-He213 Class framework (dpeaa)DE-He213 Income inequality (dpeaa)DE-He213 Latent class Analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 China (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enthalten in The Journal of Chinese Sociology Heidelberg : Springer, 2014 7(2020), 1 vom: 24. März (DE-627)815914806 (DE-600)2806685-6 2198-2635 nnns volume:7 year:2020 number:1 day:24 month:03 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40711-020-00116-9 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_70 AR 7 2020 1 24 03 |
| spelling |
10.1186/s40711-020-00116-9 doi (DE-627)SPR039197166 (SPR)s40711-020-00116-9-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Liu, Xin verfasserin aut Class structure and income inequality in transitional China 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Integrating Kornai’s concept of coordination mechanism and Weber’s types of domination, the author argues that, based on the different property rights embedded within the state power structure, bureaucratic and market coordination define class positions in bureaucratic domination by virtue of authority and in market domination by virtue of market capacity. Class relations are defined as relations of domination and economic interest distribution. A class framework composed of 16 class positions is constructed in terms of authority or market capacity in dual domination. The seven-class scheme generated by aggregation of the 16 class positions fits well with a four-cluster model estimated with latent class analysis of the 2010 CGSS, suggesting that the proposed framework is empirically relevant. The statistical findings also show that, compared to advanced industrialized societies, China has a larger proportion of command classes, a relatively equal share of new and old middle classes, and a smaller working class. China has significantly more farmers, especially in the central and western regions. The class structure is olive-shaped in the eastern region but “圭” (gui)-shaped in the central and western regions. The proposed class scheme can significantly predict income inequality, supporting the argument that class relations have the character of a “domination-interest duality.” Class structure (dpeaa)DE-He213 Stratification (dpeaa)DE-He213 Class framework (dpeaa)DE-He213 Income inequality (dpeaa)DE-He213 Latent class Analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 China (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enthalten in The Journal of Chinese Sociology Heidelberg : Springer, 2014 7(2020), 1 vom: 24. März (DE-627)815914806 (DE-600)2806685-6 2198-2635 nnns volume:7 year:2020 number:1 day:24 month:03 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40711-020-00116-9 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_70 AR 7 2020 1 24 03 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1186/s40711-020-00116-9 doi (DE-627)SPR039197166 (SPR)s40711-020-00116-9-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Liu, Xin verfasserin aut Class structure and income inequality in transitional China 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Integrating Kornai’s concept of coordination mechanism and Weber’s types of domination, the author argues that, based on the different property rights embedded within the state power structure, bureaucratic and market coordination define class positions in bureaucratic domination by virtue of authority and in market domination by virtue of market capacity. Class relations are defined as relations of domination and economic interest distribution. A class framework composed of 16 class positions is constructed in terms of authority or market capacity in dual domination. The seven-class scheme generated by aggregation of the 16 class positions fits well with a four-cluster model estimated with latent class analysis of the 2010 CGSS, suggesting that the proposed framework is empirically relevant. The statistical findings also show that, compared to advanced industrialized societies, China has a larger proportion of command classes, a relatively equal share of new and old middle classes, and a smaller working class. China has significantly more farmers, especially in the central and western regions. The class structure is olive-shaped in the eastern region but “圭” (gui)-shaped in the central and western regions. The proposed class scheme can significantly predict income inequality, supporting the argument that class relations have the character of a “domination-interest duality.” Class structure (dpeaa)DE-He213 Stratification (dpeaa)DE-He213 Class framework (dpeaa)DE-He213 Income inequality (dpeaa)DE-He213 Latent class Analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 China (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enthalten in The Journal of Chinese Sociology Heidelberg : Springer, 2014 7(2020), 1 vom: 24. März (DE-627)815914806 (DE-600)2806685-6 2198-2635 nnns volume:7 year:2020 number:1 day:24 month:03 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40711-020-00116-9 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_70 AR 7 2020 1 24 03 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1186/s40711-020-00116-9 doi (DE-627)SPR039197166 (SPR)s40711-020-00116-9-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Liu, Xin verfasserin aut Class structure and income inequality in transitional China 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Integrating Kornai’s concept of coordination mechanism and Weber’s types of domination, the author argues that, based on the different property rights embedded within the state power structure, bureaucratic and market coordination define class positions in bureaucratic domination by virtue of authority and in market domination by virtue of market capacity. Class relations are defined as relations of domination and economic interest distribution. A class framework composed of 16 class positions is constructed in terms of authority or market capacity in dual domination. The seven-class scheme generated by aggregation of the 16 class positions fits well with a four-cluster model estimated with latent class analysis of the 2010 CGSS, suggesting that the proposed framework is empirically relevant. The statistical findings also show that, compared to advanced industrialized societies, China has a larger proportion of command classes, a relatively equal share of new and old middle classes, and a smaller working class. China has significantly more farmers, especially in the central and western regions. The class structure is olive-shaped in the eastern region but “圭” (gui)-shaped in the central and western regions. The proposed class scheme can significantly predict income inequality, supporting the argument that class relations have the character of a “domination-interest duality.” Class structure (dpeaa)DE-He213 Stratification (dpeaa)DE-He213 Class framework (dpeaa)DE-He213 Income inequality (dpeaa)DE-He213 Latent class Analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 China (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enthalten in The Journal of Chinese Sociology Heidelberg : Springer, 2014 7(2020), 1 vom: 24. März (DE-627)815914806 (DE-600)2806685-6 2198-2635 nnns volume:7 year:2020 number:1 day:24 month:03 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40711-020-00116-9 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_70 AR 7 2020 1 24 03 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1186/s40711-020-00116-9 doi (DE-627)SPR039197166 (SPR)s40711-020-00116-9-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Liu, Xin verfasserin aut Class structure and income inequality in transitional China 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Integrating Kornai’s concept of coordination mechanism and Weber’s types of domination, the author argues that, based on the different property rights embedded within the state power structure, bureaucratic and market coordination define class positions in bureaucratic domination by virtue of authority and in market domination by virtue of market capacity. Class relations are defined as relations of domination and economic interest distribution. A class framework composed of 16 class positions is constructed in terms of authority or market capacity in dual domination. The seven-class scheme generated by aggregation of the 16 class positions fits well with a four-cluster model estimated with latent class analysis of the 2010 CGSS, suggesting that the proposed framework is empirically relevant. The statistical findings also show that, compared to advanced industrialized societies, China has a larger proportion of command classes, a relatively equal share of new and old middle classes, and a smaller working class. China has significantly more farmers, especially in the central and western regions. The class structure is olive-shaped in the eastern region but “圭” (gui)-shaped in the central and western regions. The proposed class scheme can significantly predict income inequality, supporting the argument that class relations have the character of a “domination-interest duality.” Class structure (dpeaa)DE-He213 Stratification (dpeaa)DE-He213 Class framework (dpeaa)DE-He213 Income inequality (dpeaa)DE-He213 Latent class Analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 China (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enthalten in The Journal of Chinese Sociology Heidelberg : Springer, 2014 7(2020), 1 vom: 24. März (DE-627)815914806 (DE-600)2806685-6 2198-2635 nnns volume:7 year:2020 number:1 day:24 month:03 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40711-020-00116-9 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_70 AR 7 2020 1 24 03 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in The Journal of Chinese Sociology 7(2020), 1 vom: 24. März volume:7 year:2020 number:1 day:24 month:03 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in The Journal of Chinese Sociology 7(2020), 1 vom: 24. März volume:7 year:2020 number:1 day:24 month:03 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Class structure Stratification Class framework Income inequality Latent class Analysis China |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
The Journal of Chinese Sociology |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Liu, Xin @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-03-24T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
815914806 |
| id |
SPR039197166 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR039197166</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20201126000936.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/s40711-020-00116-9</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR039197166</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s40711-020-00116-9-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liu, Xin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Class structure and income inequality in transitional China</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Integrating Kornai’s concept of coordination mechanism and Weber’s types of domination, the author argues that, based on the different property rights embedded within the state power structure, bureaucratic and market coordination define class positions in bureaucratic domination by virtue of authority and in market domination by virtue of market capacity. Class relations are defined as relations of domination and economic interest distribution. A class framework composed of 16 class positions is constructed in terms of authority or market capacity in dual domination. The seven-class scheme generated by aggregation of the 16 class positions fits well with a four-cluster model estimated with latent class analysis of the 2010 CGSS, suggesting that the proposed framework is empirically relevant. The statistical findings also show that, compared to advanced industrialized societies, China has a larger proportion of command classes, a relatively equal share of new and old middle classes, and a smaller working class. China has significantly more farmers, especially in the central and western regions. The class structure is olive-shaped in the eastern region but “圭” (gui)-shaped in the central and western regions. The proposed class scheme can significantly predict income inequality, supporting the argument that class relations have the character of a “domination-interest duality.”</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Class structure</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Stratification</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Class framework</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Income inequality</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Latent class Analysis</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">China</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The Journal of Chinese Sociology</subfield><subfield code="d">Heidelberg : Springer, 2014</subfield><subfield code="g">7(2020), 1 vom: 24. März</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)815914806</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2806685-6</subfield><subfield code="x">2198-2635</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:7</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:24</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40711-020-00116-9</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">7</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">24</subfield><subfield code="c">03</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Liu, Xin |
| spellingShingle |
Liu, Xin misc Class structure misc Stratification misc Class framework misc Income inequality misc Latent class Analysis misc China Class structure and income inequality in transitional China |
| authorStr |
Liu, Xin |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)815914806 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
2198-2635 |
| topic_title |
Class structure and income inequality in transitional China Class structure (dpeaa)DE-He213 Stratification (dpeaa)DE-He213 Class framework (dpeaa)DE-He213 Income inequality (dpeaa)DE-He213 Latent class Analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 China (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
misc Class structure misc Stratification misc Class framework misc Income inequality misc Latent class Analysis misc China |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Class structure misc Stratification misc Class framework misc Income inequality misc Latent class Analysis misc China |
| topic_browse |
misc Class structure misc Stratification misc Class framework misc Income inequality misc Latent class Analysis misc China |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
The Journal of Chinese Sociology |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
815914806 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
The Journal of Chinese Sociology |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)815914806 (DE-600)2806685-6 |
| title |
Class structure and income inequality in transitional China |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR039197166 (SPR)s40711-020-00116-9-e |
| title_full |
Class structure and income inequality in transitional China |
| author_sort |
Liu, Xin |
| journal |
The Journal of Chinese Sociology |
| journalStr |
The Journal of Chinese Sociology |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| author_browse |
Liu, Xin |
| container_volume |
7 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Liu, Xin |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1186/s40711-020-00116-9 |
| title_sort |
class structure and income inequality in transitional china |
| title_auth |
Class structure and income inequality in transitional China |
| abstract |
Abstract Integrating Kornai’s concept of coordination mechanism and Weber’s types of domination, the author argues that, based on the different property rights embedded within the state power structure, bureaucratic and market coordination define class positions in bureaucratic domination by virtue of authority and in market domination by virtue of market capacity. Class relations are defined as relations of domination and economic interest distribution. A class framework composed of 16 class positions is constructed in terms of authority or market capacity in dual domination. The seven-class scheme generated by aggregation of the 16 class positions fits well with a four-cluster model estimated with latent class analysis of the 2010 CGSS, suggesting that the proposed framework is empirically relevant. The statistical findings also show that, compared to advanced industrialized societies, China has a larger proportion of command classes, a relatively equal share of new and old middle classes, and a smaller working class. China has significantly more farmers, especially in the central and western regions. The class structure is olive-shaped in the eastern region but “圭” (gui)-shaped in the central and western regions. The proposed class scheme can significantly predict income inequality, supporting the argument that class relations have the character of a “domination-interest duality.” |
| abstractGer |
Abstract Integrating Kornai’s concept of coordination mechanism and Weber’s types of domination, the author argues that, based on the different property rights embedded within the state power structure, bureaucratic and market coordination define class positions in bureaucratic domination by virtue of authority and in market domination by virtue of market capacity. Class relations are defined as relations of domination and economic interest distribution. A class framework composed of 16 class positions is constructed in terms of authority or market capacity in dual domination. The seven-class scheme generated by aggregation of the 16 class positions fits well with a four-cluster model estimated with latent class analysis of the 2010 CGSS, suggesting that the proposed framework is empirically relevant. The statistical findings also show that, compared to advanced industrialized societies, China has a larger proportion of command classes, a relatively equal share of new and old middle classes, and a smaller working class. China has significantly more farmers, especially in the central and western regions. The class structure is olive-shaped in the eastern region but “圭” (gui)-shaped in the central and western regions. The proposed class scheme can significantly predict income inequality, supporting the argument that class relations have the character of a “domination-interest duality.” |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Integrating Kornai’s concept of coordination mechanism and Weber’s types of domination, the author argues that, based on the different property rights embedded within the state power structure, bureaucratic and market coordination define class positions in bureaucratic domination by virtue of authority and in market domination by virtue of market capacity. Class relations are defined as relations of domination and economic interest distribution. A class framework composed of 16 class positions is constructed in terms of authority or market capacity in dual domination. The seven-class scheme generated by aggregation of the 16 class positions fits well with a four-cluster model estimated with latent class analysis of the 2010 CGSS, suggesting that the proposed framework is empirically relevant. The statistical findings also show that, compared to advanced industrialized societies, China has a larger proportion of command classes, a relatively equal share of new and old middle classes, and a smaller working class. China has significantly more farmers, especially in the central and western regions. The class structure is olive-shaped in the eastern region but “圭” (gui)-shaped in the central and western regions. The proposed class scheme can significantly predict income inequality, supporting the argument that class relations have the character of a “domination-interest duality.” |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_70 |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
Class structure and income inequality in transitional China |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40711-020-00116-9 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
815914806 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1186/s40711-020-00116-9 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T22:36:46.914Z |
| _version_ |
1803599171466297344 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR039197166</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20201126000936.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/s40711-020-00116-9</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR039197166</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s40711-020-00116-9-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liu, Xin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Class structure and income inequality in transitional China</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Integrating Kornai’s concept of coordination mechanism and Weber’s types of domination, the author argues that, based on the different property rights embedded within the state power structure, bureaucratic and market coordination define class positions in bureaucratic domination by virtue of authority and in market domination by virtue of market capacity. Class relations are defined as relations of domination and economic interest distribution. A class framework composed of 16 class positions is constructed in terms of authority or market capacity in dual domination. The seven-class scheme generated by aggregation of the 16 class positions fits well with a four-cluster model estimated with latent class analysis of the 2010 CGSS, suggesting that the proposed framework is empirically relevant. The statistical findings also show that, compared to advanced industrialized societies, China has a larger proportion of command classes, a relatively equal share of new and old middle classes, and a smaller working class. China has significantly more farmers, especially in the central and western regions. The class structure is olive-shaped in the eastern region but “圭” (gui)-shaped in the central and western regions. The proposed class scheme can significantly predict income inequality, supporting the argument that class relations have the character of a “domination-interest duality.”</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Class structure</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Stratification</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Class framework</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Income inequality</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Latent class Analysis</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">China</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The Journal of Chinese Sociology</subfield><subfield code="d">Heidelberg : Springer, 2014</subfield><subfield code="g">7(2020), 1 vom: 24. März</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)815914806</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2806685-6</subfield><subfield code="x">2198-2635</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:7</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:24</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40711-020-00116-9</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">7</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">24</subfield><subfield code="c">03</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3984957 |