Common Pitfalls of Reporting Electrocatalysts for Water Splitting
Abstract Rigorous assessment of heterogeneous electrocatalysts for electrochemical water splitting has been a critical issue mainly due to insufficient standard protocols to measure and report experimental data. In this perspective, we highlight some common pitfalls when measuring and reporting elec...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Wang, Yuan [verfasserIn] Arandiyan, Hamidreza [verfasserIn] Dastafkan, Kamran [verfasserIn] Li, Yibing [verfasserIn] Zhao, Chuan [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Chemical Research in Chinese Universities - Jilin University and The Editorial Department of Chemical Research in Chinese Universities, 2012, 36(2020), 3 vom: 19. Mai, Seite 360-365 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:36 ; year:2020 ; number:3 ; day:19 ; month:05 ; pages:360-365 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s40242-020-0107-1 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR039946045 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR039946045 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230519194643.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201007s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s40242-020-0107-1 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR039946045 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)s40242-020-0107-1-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Wang, Yuan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Common Pitfalls of Reporting Electrocatalysts for Water Splitting |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Rigorous assessment of heterogeneous electrocatalysts for electrochemical water splitting has been a critical issue mainly due to insufficient standard protocols to measure and report experimental data. In this perspective, we highlight some common pitfalls when measuring and reporting electrocatalytic data, which should be avoided to ensure the accuracy and reproducibility and to advance the water splitting field. We advocate to prevent the introduction of artefacts from the counter and reference electrodes, as well as the impurities in the electrolyte when conducting electrocatalyst activity measurements. In addition, we encourage the use of the electrochemically active surface area(ECSA)-normalized current densities to represent the intrinsic activity of the reported catalysts for a better comparison with previously known materials. Suitable ECSA measurement methods should be employed based on the nature of catalysts. Recommendations made in this perspective will hopefully assist in identifying advanced catalysts for water splitting research. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Electrocatalyst |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Water splitting |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Electrochemical active surface area |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Benchmarking catalyst |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Energy conversion and storage |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Arandiyan, Hamidreza |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dastafkan, Kamran |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Li, Yibing |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhao, Chuan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Chemical Research in Chinese Universities |d Jilin University and The Editorial Department of Chemical Research in Chinese Universities, 2012 |g 36(2020), 3 vom: 19. Mai, Seite 360-365 |w (DE-627)SPR03290777X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:36 |g year:2020 |g number:3 |g day:19 |g month:05 |g pages:360-365 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40242-020-0107-1 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 36 |j 2020 |e 3 |b 19 |c 05 |h 360-365 | ||
| author_variant |
y w yw h a ha k d kd y l yl c z cz |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
wangyuanarandiyanhamidrezadastafkankamra:2020----:omniflsfeotneetoaaytf |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2020 |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s40242-020-0107-1 doi (DE-627)SPR039946045 (SPR)s40242-020-0107-1-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Wang, Yuan verfasserin aut Common Pitfalls of Reporting Electrocatalysts for Water Splitting 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Rigorous assessment of heterogeneous electrocatalysts for electrochemical water splitting has been a critical issue mainly due to insufficient standard protocols to measure and report experimental data. In this perspective, we highlight some common pitfalls when measuring and reporting electrocatalytic data, which should be avoided to ensure the accuracy and reproducibility and to advance the water splitting field. We advocate to prevent the introduction of artefacts from the counter and reference electrodes, as well as the impurities in the electrolyte when conducting electrocatalyst activity measurements. In addition, we encourage the use of the electrochemically active surface area(ECSA)-normalized current densities to represent the intrinsic activity of the reported catalysts for a better comparison with previously known materials. Suitable ECSA measurement methods should be employed based on the nature of catalysts. Recommendations made in this perspective will hopefully assist in identifying advanced catalysts for water splitting research. Electrocatalyst (dpeaa)DE-He213 Water splitting (dpeaa)DE-He213 Electrochemical active surface area (dpeaa)DE-He213 Benchmarking catalyst (dpeaa)DE-He213 Energy conversion and storage (dpeaa)DE-He213 Arandiyan, Hamidreza verfasserin aut Dastafkan, Kamran verfasserin aut Li, Yibing verfasserin aut Zhao, Chuan verfasserin aut Enthalten in Chemical Research in Chinese Universities Jilin University and The Editorial Department of Chemical Research in Chinese Universities, 2012 36(2020), 3 vom: 19. Mai, Seite 360-365 (DE-627)SPR03290777X nnns volume:36 year:2020 number:3 day:19 month:05 pages:360-365 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40242-020-0107-1 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA AR 36 2020 3 19 05 360-365 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s40242-020-0107-1 doi (DE-627)SPR039946045 (SPR)s40242-020-0107-1-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Wang, Yuan verfasserin aut Common Pitfalls of Reporting Electrocatalysts for Water Splitting 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Rigorous assessment of heterogeneous electrocatalysts for electrochemical water splitting has been a critical issue mainly due to insufficient standard protocols to measure and report experimental data. In this perspective, we highlight some common pitfalls when measuring and reporting electrocatalytic data, which should be avoided to ensure the accuracy and reproducibility and to advance the water splitting field. We advocate to prevent the introduction of artefacts from the counter and reference electrodes, as well as the impurities in the electrolyte when conducting electrocatalyst activity measurements. In addition, we encourage the use of the electrochemically active surface area(ECSA)-normalized current densities to represent the intrinsic activity of the reported catalysts for a better comparison with previously known materials. Suitable ECSA measurement methods should be employed based on the nature of catalysts. Recommendations made in this perspective will hopefully assist in identifying advanced catalysts for water splitting research. Electrocatalyst (dpeaa)DE-He213 Water splitting (dpeaa)DE-He213 Electrochemical active surface area (dpeaa)DE-He213 Benchmarking catalyst (dpeaa)DE-He213 Energy conversion and storage (dpeaa)DE-He213 Arandiyan, Hamidreza verfasserin aut Dastafkan, Kamran verfasserin aut Li, Yibing verfasserin aut Zhao, Chuan verfasserin aut Enthalten in Chemical Research in Chinese Universities Jilin University and The Editorial Department of Chemical Research in Chinese Universities, 2012 36(2020), 3 vom: 19. Mai, Seite 360-365 (DE-627)SPR03290777X nnns volume:36 year:2020 number:3 day:19 month:05 pages:360-365 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40242-020-0107-1 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA AR 36 2020 3 19 05 360-365 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s40242-020-0107-1 doi (DE-627)SPR039946045 (SPR)s40242-020-0107-1-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Wang, Yuan verfasserin aut Common Pitfalls of Reporting Electrocatalysts for Water Splitting 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Rigorous assessment of heterogeneous electrocatalysts for electrochemical water splitting has been a critical issue mainly due to insufficient standard protocols to measure and report experimental data. In this perspective, we highlight some common pitfalls when measuring and reporting electrocatalytic data, which should be avoided to ensure the accuracy and reproducibility and to advance the water splitting field. We advocate to prevent the introduction of artefacts from the counter and reference electrodes, as well as the impurities in the electrolyte when conducting electrocatalyst activity measurements. In addition, we encourage the use of the electrochemically active surface area(ECSA)-normalized current densities to represent the intrinsic activity of the reported catalysts for a better comparison with previously known materials. Suitable ECSA measurement methods should be employed based on the nature of catalysts. Recommendations made in this perspective will hopefully assist in identifying advanced catalysts for water splitting research. Electrocatalyst (dpeaa)DE-He213 Water splitting (dpeaa)DE-He213 Electrochemical active surface area (dpeaa)DE-He213 Benchmarking catalyst (dpeaa)DE-He213 Energy conversion and storage (dpeaa)DE-He213 Arandiyan, Hamidreza verfasserin aut Dastafkan, Kamran verfasserin aut Li, Yibing verfasserin aut Zhao, Chuan verfasserin aut Enthalten in Chemical Research in Chinese Universities Jilin University and The Editorial Department of Chemical Research in Chinese Universities, 2012 36(2020), 3 vom: 19. Mai, Seite 360-365 (DE-627)SPR03290777X nnns volume:36 year:2020 number:3 day:19 month:05 pages:360-365 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40242-020-0107-1 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA AR 36 2020 3 19 05 360-365 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s40242-020-0107-1 doi (DE-627)SPR039946045 (SPR)s40242-020-0107-1-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Wang, Yuan verfasserin aut Common Pitfalls of Reporting Electrocatalysts for Water Splitting 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Rigorous assessment of heterogeneous electrocatalysts for electrochemical water splitting has been a critical issue mainly due to insufficient standard protocols to measure and report experimental data. In this perspective, we highlight some common pitfalls when measuring and reporting electrocatalytic data, which should be avoided to ensure the accuracy and reproducibility and to advance the water splitting field. We advocate to prevent the introduction of artefacts from the counter and reference electrodes, as well as the impurities in the electrolyte when conducting electrocatalyst activity measurements. In addition, we encourage the use of the electrochemically active surface area(ECSA)-normalized current densities to represent the intrinsic activity of the reported catalysts for a better comparison with previously known materials. Suitable ECSA measurement methods should be employed based on the nature of catalysts. Recommendations made in this perspective will hopefully assist in identifying advanced catalysts for water splitting research. Electrocatalyst (dpeaa)DE-He213 Water splitting (dpeaa)DE-He213 Electrochemical active surface area (dpeaa)DE-He213 Benchmarking catalyst (dpeaa)DE-He213 Energy conversion and storage (dpeaa)DE-He213 Arandiyan, Hamidreza verfasserin aut Dastafkan, Kamran verfasserin aut Li, Yibing verfasserin aut Zhao, Chuan verfasserin aut Enthalten in Chemical Research in Chinese Universities Jilin University and The Editorial Department of Chemical Research in Chinese Universities, 2012 36(2020), 3 vom: 19. Mai, Seite 360-365 (DE-627)SPR03290777X nnns volume:36 year:2020 number:3 day:19 month:05 pages:360-365 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40242-020-0107-1 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA AR 36 2020 3 19 05 360-365 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s40242-020-0107-1 doi (DE-627)SPR039946045 (SPR)s40242-020-0107-1-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Wang, Yuan verfasserin aut Common Pitfalls of Reporting Electrocatalysts for Water Splitting 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Rigorous assessment of heterogeneous electrocatalysts for electrochemical water splitting has been a critical issue mainly due to insufficient standard protocols to measure and report experimental data. In this perspective, we highlight some common pitfalls when measuring and reporting electrocatalytic data, which should be avoided to ensure the accuracy and reproducibility and to advance the water splitting field. We advocate to prevent the introduction of artefacts from the counter and reference electrodes, as well as the impurities in the electrolyte when conducting electrocatalyst activity measurements. In addition, we encourage the use of the electrochemically active surface area(ECSA)-normalized current densities to represent the intrinsic activity of the reported catalysts for a better comparison with previously known materials. Suitable ECSA measurement methods should be employed based on the nature of catalysts. Recommendations made in this perspective will hopefully assist in identifying advanced catalysts for water splitting research. Electrocatalyst (dpeaa)DE-He213 Water splitting (dpeaa)DE-He213 Electrochemical active surface area (dpeaa)DE-He213 Benchmarking catalyst (dpeaa)DE-He213 Energy conversion and storage (dpeaa)DE-He213 Arandiyan, Hamidreza verfasserin aut Dastafkan, Kamran verfasserin aut Li, Yibing verfasserin aut Zhao, Chuan verfasserin aut Enthalten in Chemical Research in Chinese Universities Jilin University and The Editorial Department of Chemical Research in Chinese Universities, 2012 36(2020), 3 vom: 19. Mai, Seite 360-365 (DE-627)SPR03290777X nnns volume:36 year:2020 number:3 day:19 month:05 pages:360-365 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40242-020-0107-1 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA AR 36 2020 3 19 05 360-365 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Chemical Research in Chinese Universities 36(2020), 3 vom: 19. Mai, Seite 360-365 volume:36 year:2020 number:3 day:19 month:05 pages:360-365 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Chemical Research in Chinese Universities 36(2020), 3 vom: 19. Mai, Seite 360-365 volume:36 year:2020 number:3 day:19 month:05 pages:360-365 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Electrocatalyst Water splitting Electrochemical active surface area Benchmarking catalyst Energy conversion and storage |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Chemical Research in Chinese Universities |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Wang, Yuan @@aut@@ Arandiyan, Hamidreza @@aut@@ Dastafkan, Kamran @@aut@@ Li, Yibing @@aut@@ Zhao, Chuan @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-05-19T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
SPR03290777X |
| id |
SPR039946045 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR039946045</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519194643.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s40242-020-0107-1</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR039946045</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s40242-020-0107-1-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Yuan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Common Pitfalls of Reporting Electrocatalysts for Water Splitting</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Rigorous assessment of heterogeneous electrocatalysts for electrochemical water splitting has been a critical issue mainly due to insufficient standard protocols to measure and report experimental data. In this perspective, we highlight some common pitfalls when measuring and reporting electrocatalytic data, which should be avoided to ensure the accuracy and reproducibility and to advance the water splitting field. We advocate to prevent the introduction of artefacts from the counter and reference electrodes, as well as the impurities in the electrolyte when conducting electrocatalyst activity measurements. In addition, we encourage the use of the electrochemically active surface area(ECSA)-normalized current densities to represent the intrinsic activity of the reported catalysts for a better comparison with previously known materials. Suitable ECSA measurement methods should be employed based on the nature of catalysts. Recommendations made in this perspective will hopefully assist in identifying advanced catalysts for water splitting research.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Electrocatalyst</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Water splitting</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Electrochemical active surface area</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Benchmarking catalyst</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Energy conversion and storage</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Arandiyan, Hamidreza</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dastafkan, Kamran</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Li, Yibing</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhao, Chuan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Chemical Research in Chinese Universities</subfield><subfield code="d">Jilin University and The Editorial Department of Chemical Research in Chinese Universities, 2012</subfield><subfield code="g">36(2020), 3 vom: 19. Mai, Seite 360-365</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR03290777X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:36</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:19</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:360-365</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40242-020-0107-1</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">36</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">19</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">360-365</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Wang, Yuan |
| spellingShingle |
Wang, Yuan misc Electrocatalyst misc Water splitting misc Electrochemical active surface area misc Benchmarking catalyst misc Energy conversion and storage Common Pitfalls of Reporting Electrocatalysts for Water Splitting |
| authorStr |
Wang, Yuan |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)SPR03290777X |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
Common Pitfalls of Reporting Electrocatalysts for Water Splitting Electrocatalyst (dpeaa)DE-He213 Water splitting (dpeaa)DE-He213 Electrochemical active surface area (dpeaa)DE-He213 Benchmarking catalyst (dpeaa)DE-He213 Energy conversion and storage (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
misc Electrocatalyst misc Water splitting misc Electrochemical active surface area misc Benchmarking catalyst misc Energy conversion and storage |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Electrocatalyst misc Water splitting misc Electrochemical active surface area misc Benchmarking catalyst misc Energy conversion and storage |
| topic_browse |
misc Electrocatalyst misc Water splitting misc Electrochemical active surface area misc Benchmarking catalyst misc Energy conversion and storage |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Chemical Research in Chinese Universities |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
SPR03290777X |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Chemical Research in Chinese Universities |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)SPR03290777X |
| title |
Common Pitfalls of Reporting Electrocatalysts for Water Splitting |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR039946045 (SPR)s40242-020-0107-1-e |
| title_full |
Common Pitfalls of Reporting Electrocatalysts for Water Splitting |
| author_sort |
Wang, Yuan |
| journal |
Chemical Research in Chinese Universities |
| journalStr |
Chemical Research in Chinese Universities |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
360 |
| author_browse |
Wang, Yuan Arandiyan, Hamidreza Dastafkan, Kamran Li, Yibing Zhao, Chuan |
| container_volume |
36 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Wang, Yuan |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s40242-020-0107-1 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
common pitfalls of reporting electrocatalysts for water splitting |
| title_auth |
Common Pitfalls of Reporting Electrocatalysts for Water Splitting |
| abstract |
Abstract Rigorous assessment of heterogeneous electrocatalysts for electrochemical water splitting has been a critical issue mainly due to insufficient standard protocols to measure and report experimental data. In this perspective, we highlight some common pitfalls when measuring and reporting electrocatalytic data, which should be avoided to ensure the accuracy and reproducibility and to advance the water splitting field. We advocate to prevent the introduction of artefacts from the counter and reference electrodes, as well as the impurities in the electrolyte when conducting electrocatalyst activity measurements. In addition, we encourage the use of the electrochemically active surface area(ECSA)-normalized current densities to represent the intrinsic activity of the reported catalysts for a better comparison with previously known materials. Suitable ECSA measurement methods should be employed based on the nature of catalysts. Recommendations made in this perspective will hopefully assist in identifying advanced catalysts for water splitting research. |
| abstractGer |
Abstract Rigorous assessment of heterogeneous electrocatalysts for electrochemical water splitting has been a critical issue mainly due to insufficient standard protocols to measure and report experimental data. In this perspective, we highlight some common pitfalls when measuring and reporting electrocatalytic data, which should be avoided to ensure the accuracy and reproducibility and to advance the water splitting field. We advocate to prevent the introduction of artefacts from the counter and reference electrodes, as well as the impurities in the electrolyte when conducting electrocatalyst activity measurements. In addition, we encourage the use of the electrochemically active surface area(ECSA)-normalized current densities to represent the intrinsic activity of the reported catalysts for a better comparison with previously known materials. Suitable ECSA measurement methods should be employed based on the nature of catalysts. Recommendations made in this perspective will hopefully assist in identifying advanced catalysts for water splitting research. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Rigorous assessment of heterogeneous electrocatalysts for electrochemical water splitting has been a critical issue mainly due to insufficient standard protocols to measure and report experimental data. In this perspective, we highlight some common pitfalls when measuring and reporting electrocatalytic data, which should be avoided to ensure the accuracy and reproducibility and to advance the water splitting field. We advocate to prevent the introduction of artefacts from the counter and reference electrodes, as well as the impurities in the electrolyte when conducting electrocatalyst activity measurements. In addition, we encourage the use of the electrochemically active surface area(ECSA)-normalized current densities to represent the intrinsic activity of the reported catalysts for a better comparison with previously known materials. Suitable ECSA measurement methods should be employed based on the nature of catalysts. Recommendations made in this perspective will hopefully assist in identifying advanced catalysts for water splitting research. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA |
| container_issue |
3 |
| title_short |
Common Pitfalls of Reporting Electrocatalysts for Water Splitting |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40242-020-0107-1 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Arandiyan, Hamidreza Dastafkan, Kamran Li, Yibing Zhao, Chuan |
| author2Str |
Arandiyan, Hamidreza Dastafkan, Kamran Li, Yibing Zhao, Chuan |
| ppnlink |
SPR03290777X |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s40242-020-0107-1 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T02:15:06.357Z |
| _version_ |
1803612907225743360 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR039946045</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519194643.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s40242-020-0107-1</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR039946045</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s40242-020-0107-1-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Yuan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Common Pitfalls of Reporting Electrocatalysts for Water Splitting</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Rigorous assessment of heterogeneous electrocatalysts for electrochemical water splitting has been a critical issue mainly due to insufficient standard protocols to measure and report experimental data. In this perspective, we highlight some common pitfalls when measuring and reporting electrocatalytic data, which should be avoided to ensure the accuracy and reproducibility and to advance the water splitting field. We advocate to prevent the introduction of artefacts from the counter and reference electrodes, as well as the impurities in the electrolyte when conducting electrocatalyst activity measurements. In addition, we encourage the use of the electrochemically active surface area(ECSA)-normalized current densities to represent the intrinsic activity of the reported catalysts for a better comparison with previously known materials. Suitable ECSA measurement methods should be employed based on the nature of catalysts. Recommendations made in this perspective will hopefully assist in identifying advanced catalysts for water splitting research.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Electrocatalyst</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Water splitting</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Electrochemical active surface area</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Benchmarking catalyst</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Energy conversion and storage</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Arandiyan, Hamidreza</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dastafkan, Kamran</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Li, Yibing</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhao, Chuan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Chemical Research in Chinese Universities</subfield><subfield code="d">Jilin University and The Editorial Department of Chemical Research in Chinese Universities, 2012</subfield><subfield code="g">36(2020), 3 vom: 19. Mai, Seite 360-365</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR03290777X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:36</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:19</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:360-365</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40242-020-0107-1</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">36</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">19</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">360-365</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3999996 |