Experimental nest replacement suggests that the bacterial load of nests may mediate nestling physiological condition in cavity nesting Great Tits (Parus major)

Abstract Nests of secondary-cavity breeding birds are structures constructed to lay and incubate eggs and raise nestlings to fledging. These nests are characterized by relatively stable conditions, which makes them a suitable habitat for various microorganisms. It has been suggested that bacteria in...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Zabłotni, Agnieszka [verfasserIn] Kaliński, Adam [verfasserIn] Bańbura, Mirosława [verfasserIn] Glądalski, Michał [verfasserIn] Markowski, Marcin [verfasserIn] Skwarska, Joanna [verfasserIn] Wawrzyniak, Jarosław [verfasserIn] Bańbura, Jerzy [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2020

Schlagwörter:	Nest bacterial load Skin bacterial load Nest replacement Great tit Hemoglobin Nestling condition

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Journal für Ornithologie - Oxford : Blackwell, 1853, 161(2020), 3 vom: 14. März, Seite 819-828
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:161 ; year:2020 ; number:3 ; day:14 ; month:03 ; pages:819-828

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.1007/s10336-020-01759-8

Katalog-ID:	SPR039973050

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	SPR039973050
003	DE-627
005	20220110211502.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	201007s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1007/s10336-020-01759-8 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)SPR039973050
035			\|a (SPR)s10336-020-01759-8-e
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 590 \|q ASE
084			\|a 42.83 \|2 bkl
100	1		\|a Zabłotni, Agnieszka \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Experimental nest replacement suggests that the bacterial load of nests may mediate nestling physiological condition in cavity nesting Great Tits (Parus major)
264		1	\|c 2020
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Abstract Nests of secondary-cavity breeding birds are structures constructed to lay and incubate eggs and raise nestlings to fledging. These nests are characterized by relatively stable conditions, which makes them a suitable habitat for various microorganisms. It has been suggested that bacteria inhabiting nests and nestling skin may affect nestlings both positively and negatively. In this study, nests of Great Tits Parus major were replaced with artificial nests on the fifth day of the nestling phase in two different study sites to create two categories of nests: (i) natural and (ii) artificial with a reduced bacterial load. Four days later, bacterial samples were collected from the nestling skin and from the edge of the nest to assess skin and nest bacterial loads, expressed as colony forming units (CFUs). It was predicted that (i) the previous season occupancy of nest boxes would influence bacterial loads, (ii) the experimental treatment would reduce nest and skin bacterial loads, and (iii) that nest and skin bacterial loads would affect the condition of the nestlings, assessed as the hemoglobin concentration in blood when nestlings were 14 days old. Occupancy in the previous season did not affect the bacterial load. The skin bacterial load was significantly lower in artificial nests, although the nest bacterial load did not differ between natural and artificial nests. Nestlings from artificial nests had higher hemoglobin, and hemoglobin concentration was negatively associated with the nest but not the skin bacterial load. Our results suggest that the bacterial load in nests may negatively affect the physiological condition of avian hosts.
650		4	\|a Nest bacterial load \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Skin bacterial load \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Nest replacement \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Great tit \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Hemoglobin \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Nestling condition \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
700	1		\|a Kaliński, Adam \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Bańbura, Mirosława \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Glądalski, Michał \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Markowski, Marcin \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Skwarska, Joanna \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Wawrzyniak, Jarosław \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Bańbura, Jerzy \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Journal für Ornithologie \|d Oxford : Blackwell, 1853 \|g 161(2020), 3 vom: 14. März, Seite 819-828 \|w (DE-627)323607284 \|w (DE-600)2026338-7 \|x 1439-0361 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:161 \|g year:2020 \|g number:3 \|g day:14 \|g month:03 \|g pages:819-828
856	4	0	\|u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10336-020-01759-8 \|z kostenfrei \|3 Volltext
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_SPRINGER
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_32
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_90
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_100
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_120
912			\|a GBV_ILN_138
912			\|a GBV_ILN_152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_171
912			\|a GBV_ILN_187
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_250
912			\|a GBV_ILN_281
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
936	b	k	\|a 42.83 \|q ASE
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 161 \|j 2020 \|e 3 \|b 14 \|c 03 \|h 819-828

Indexfelder

author_variant	a z az a k ak m b mb m g mg m m mm j s js j w jw j b jb
matchkey_str	article:14390361:2020----::xeietletelcmnsgettateatralaonssamdaeetighsooiacniin
hierarchy_sort_str	2020
bklnumber	42.83
publishDate	2020
allfields	10.1007/s10336-020-01759-8 doi (DE-627)SPR039973050 (SPR)s10336-020-01759-8-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 590 ASE 42.83 bkl Zabłotni, Agnieszka verfasserin aut Experimental nest replacement suggests that the bacterial load of nests may mediate nestling physiological condition in cavity nesting Great Tits (Parus major) 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Nests of secondary-cavity breeding birds are structures constructed to lay and incubate eggs and raise nestlings to fledging. These nests are characterized by relatively stable conditions, which makes them a suitable habitat for various microorganisms. It has been suggested that bacteria inhabiting nests and nestling skin may affect nestlings both positively and negatively. In this study, nests of Great Tits Parus major were replaced with artificial nests on the fifth day of the nestling phase in two different study sites to create two categories of nests: (i) natural and (ii) artificial with a reduced bacterial load. Four days later, bacterial samples were collected from the nestling skin and from the edge of the nest to assess skin and nest bacterial loads, expressed as colony forming units (CFUs). It was predicted that (i) the previous season occupancy of nest boxes would influence bacterial loads, (ii) the experimental treatment would reduce nest and skin bacterial loads, and (iii) that nest and skin bacterial loads would affect the condition of the nestlings, assessed as the hemoglobin concentration in blood when nestlings were 14 days old. Occupancy in the previous season did not affect the bacterial load. The skin bacterial load was significantly lower in artificial nests, although the nest bacterial load did not differ between natural and artificial nests. Nestlings from artificial nests had higher hemoglobin, and hemoglobin concentration was negatively associated with the nest but not the skin bacterial load. Our results suggest that the bacterial load in nests may negatively affect the physiological condition of avian hosts. Nest bacterial load (dpeaa)DE-He213 Skin bacterial load (dpeaa)DE-He213 Nest replacement (dpeaa)DE-He213 Great tit (dpeaa)DE-He213 Hemoglobin (dpeaa)DE-He213 Nestling condition (dpeaa)DE-He213 Kaliński, Adam verfasserin aut Bańbura, Mirosława verfasserin aut Glądalski, Michał verfasserin aut Markowski, Marcin verfasserin aut Skwarska, Joanna verfasserin aut Wawrzyniak, Jarosław verfasserin aut Bańbura, Jerzy verfasserin aut Enthalten in Journal für Ornithologie Oxford : Blackwell, 1853 161(2020), 3 vom: 14. März, Seite 819-828 (DE-627)323607284 (DE-600)2026338-7 1439-0361 nnns volume:161 year:2020 number:3 day:14 month:03 pages:819-828 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10336-020-01759-8 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4305 42.83 ASE AR 161 2020 3 14 03 819-828
spelling	10.1007/s10336-020-01759-8 doi (DE-627)SPR039973050 (SPR)s10336-020-01759-8-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 590 ASE 42.83 bkl Zabłotni, Agnieszka verfasserin aut Experimental nest replacement suggests that the bacterial load of nests may mediate nestling physiological condition in cavity nesting Great Tits (Parus major) 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Nests of secondary-cavity breeding birds are structures constructed to lay and incubate eggs and raise nestlings to fledging. These nests are characterized by relatively stable conditions, which makes them a suitable habitat for various microorganisms. It has been suggested that bacteria inhabiting nests and nestling skin may affect nestlings both positively and negatively. In this study, nests of Great Tits Parus major were replaced with artificial nests on the fifth day of the nestling phase in two different study sites to create two categories of nests: (i) natural and (ii) artificial with a reduced bacterial load. Four days later, bacterial samples were collected from the nestling skin and from the edge of the nest to assess skin and nest bacterial loads, expressed as colony forming units (CFUs). It was predicted that (i) the previous season occupancy of nest boxes would influence bacterial loads, (ii) the experimental treatment would reduce nest and skin bacterial loads, and (iii) that nest and skin bacterial loads would affect the condition of the nestlings, assessed as the hemoglobin concentration in blood when nestlings were 14 days old. Occupancy in the previous season did not affect the bacterial load. The skin bacterial load was significantly lower in artificial nests, although the nest bacterial load did not differ between natural and artificial nests. Nestlings from artificial nests had higher hemoglobin, and hemoglobin concentration was negatively associated with the nest but not the skin bacterial load. Our results suggest that the bacterial load in nests may negatively affect the physiological condition of avian hosts. Nest bacterial load (dpeaa)DE-He213 Skin bacterial load (dpeaa)DE-He213 Nest replacement (dpeaa)DE-He213 Great tit (dpeaa)DE-He213 Hemoglobin (dpeaa)DE-He213 Nestling condition (dpeaa)DE-He213 Kaliński, Adam verfasserin aut Bańbura, Mirosława verfasserin aut Glądalski, Michał verfasserin aut Markowski, Marcin verfasserin aut Skwarska, Joanna verfasserin aut Wawrzyniak, Jarosław verfasserin aut Bańbura, Jerzy verfasserin aut Enthalten in Journal für Ornithologie Oxford : Blackwell, 1853 161(2020), 3 vom: 14. März, Seite 819-828 (DE-627)323607284 (DE-600)2026338-7 1439-0361 nnns volume:161 year:2020 number:3 day:14 month:03 pages:819-828 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10336-020-01759-8 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4305 42.83 ASE AR 161 2020 3 14 03 819-828
allfields_unstemmed	10.1007/s10336-020-01759-8 doi (DE-627)SPR039973050 (SPR)s10336-020-01759-8-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 590 ASE 42.83 bkl Zabłotni, Agnieszka verfasserin aut Experimental nest replacement suggests that the bacterial load of nests may mediate nestling physiological condition in cavity nesting Great Tits (Parus major) 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Nests of secondary-cavity breeding birds are structures constructed to lay and incubate eggs and raise nestlings to fledging. These nests are characterized by relatively stable conditions, which makes them a suitable habitat for various microorganisms. It has been suggested that bacteria inhabiting nests and nestling skin may affect nestlings both positively and negatively. In this study, nests of Great Tits Parus major were replaced with artificial nests on the fifth day of the nestling phase in two different study sites to create two categories of nests: (i) natural and (ii) artificial with a reduced bacterial load. Four days later, bacterial samples were collected from the nestling skin and from the edge of the nest to assess skin and nest bacterial loads, expressed as colony forming units (CFUs). It was predicted that (i) the previous season occupancy of nest boxes would influence bacterial loads, (ii) the experimental treatment would reduce nest and skin bacterial loads, and (iii) that nest and skin bacterial loads would affect the condition of the nestlings, assessed as the hemoglobin concentration in blood when nestlings were 14 days old. Occupancy in the previous season did not affect the bacterial load. The skin bacterial load was significantly lower in artificial nests, although the nest bacterial load did not differ between natural and artificial nests. Nestlings from artificial nests had higher hemoglobin, and hemoglobin concentration was negatively associated with the nest but not the skin bacterial load. Our results suggest that the bacterial load in nests may negatively affect the physiological condition of avian hosts. Nest bacterial load (dpeaa)DE-He213 Skin bacterial load (dpeaa)DE-He213 Nest replacement (dpeaa)DE-He213 Great tit (dpeaa)DE-He213 Hemoglobin (dpeaa)DE-He213 Nestling condition (dpeaa)DE-He213 Kaliński, Adam verfasserin aut Bańbura, Mirosława verfasserin aut Glądalski, Michał verfasserin aut Markowski, Marcin verfasserin aut Skwarska, Joanna verfasserin aut Wawrzyniak, Jarosław verfasserin aut Bańbura, Jerzy verfasserin aut Enthalten in Journal für Ornithologie Oxford : Blackwell, 1853 161(2020), 3 vom: 14. März, Seite 819-828 (DE-627)323607284 (DE-600)2026338-7 1439-0361 nnns volume:161 year:2020 number:3 day:14 month:03 pages:819-828 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10336-020-01759-8 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4305 42.83 ASE AR 161 2020 3 14 03 819-828
allfieldsGer	10.1007/s10336-020-01759-8 doi (DE-627)SPR039973050 (SPR)s10336-020-01759-8-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 590 ASE 42.83 bkl Zabłotni, Agnieszka verfasserin aut Experimental nest replacement suggests that the bacterial load of nests may mediate nestling physiological condition in cavity nesting Great Tits (Parus major) 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Nests of secondary-cavity breeding birds are structures constructed to lay and incubate eggs and raise nestlings to fledging. These nests are characterized by relatively stable conditions, which makes them a suitable habitat for various microorganisms. It has been suggested that bacteria inhabiting nests and nestling skin may affect nestlings both positively and negatively. In this study, nests of Great Tits Parus major were replaced with artificial nests on the fifth day of the nestling phase in two different study sites to create two categories of nests: (i) natural and (ii) artificial with a reduced bacterial load. Four days later, bacterial samples were collected from the nestling skin and from the edge of the nest to assess skin and nest bacterial loads, expressed as colony forming units (CFUs). It was predicted that (i) the previous season occupancy of nest boxes would influence bacterial loads, (ii) the experimental treatment would reduce nest and skin bacterial loads, and (iii) that nest and skin bacterial loads would affect the condition of the nestlings, assessed as the hemoglobin concentration in blood when nestlings were 14 days old. Occupancy in the previous season did not affect the bacterial load. The skin bacterial load was significantly lower in artificial nests, although the nest bacterial load did not differ between natural and artificial nests. Nestlings from artificial nests had higher hemoglobin, and hemoglobin concentration was negatively associated with the nest but not the skin bacterial load. Our results suggest that the bacterial load in nests may negatively affect the physiological condition of avian hosts. Nest bacterial load (dpeaa)DE-He213 Skin bacterial load (dpeaa)DE-He213 Nest replacement (dpeaa)DE-He213 Great tit (dpeaa)DE-He213 Hemoglobin (dpeaa)DE-He213 Nestling condition (dpeaa)DE-He213 Kaliński, Adam verfasserin aut Bańbura, Mirosława verfasserin aut Glądalski, Michał verfasserin aut Markowski, Marcin verfasserin aut Skwarska, Joanna verfasserin aut Wawrzyniak, Jarosław verfasserin aut Bańbura, Jerzy verfasserin aut Enthalten in Journal für Ornithologie Oxford : Blackwell, 1853 161(2020), 3 vom: 14. März, Seite 819-828 (DE-627)323607284 (DE-600)2026338-7 1439-0361 nnns volume:161 year:2020 number:3 day:14 month:03 pages:819-828 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10336-020-01759-8 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4305 42.83 ASE AR 161 2020 3 14 03 819-828
allfieldsSound	10.1007/s10336-020-01759-8 doi (DE-627)SPR039973050 (SPR)s10336-020-01759-8-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 590 ASE 42.83 bkl Zabłotni, Agnieszka verfasserin aut Experimental nest replacement suggests that the bacterial load of nests may mediate nestling physiological condition in cavity nesting Great Tits (Parus major) 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Nests of secondary-cavity breeding birds are structures constructed to lay and incubate eggs and raise nestlings to fledging. These nests are characterized by relatively stable conditions, which makes them a suitable habitat for various microorganisms. It has been suggested that bacteria inhabiting nests and nestling skin may affect nestlings both positively and negatively. In this study, nests of Great Tits Parus major were replaced with artificial nests on the fifth day of the nestling phase in two different study sites to create two categories of nests: (i) natural and (ii) artificial with a reduced bacterial load. Four days later, bacterial samples were collected from the nestling skin and from the edge of the nest to assess skin and nest bacterial loads, expressed as colony forming units (CFUs). It was predicted that (i) the previous season occupancy of nest boxes would influence bacterial loads, (ii) the experimental treatment would reduce nest and skin bacterial loads, and (iii) that nest and skin bacterial loads would affect the condition of the nestlings, assessed as the hemoglobin concentration in blood when nestlings were 14 days old. Occupancy in the previous season did not affect the bacterial load. The skin bacterial load was significantly lower in artificial nests, although the nest bacterial load did not differ between natural and artificial nests. Nestlings from artificial nests had higher hemoglobin, and hemoglobin concentration was negatively associated with the nest but not the skin bacterial load. Our results suggest that the bacterial load in nests may negatively affect the physiological condition of avian hosts. Nest bacterial load (dpeaa)DE-He213 Skin bacterial load (dpeaa)DE-He213 Nest replacement (dpeaa)DE-He213 Great tit (dpeaa)DE-He213 Hemoglobin (dpeaa)DE-He213 Nestling condition (dpeaa)DE-He213 Kaliński, Adam verfasserin aut Bańbura, Mirosława verfasserin aut Glądalski, Michał verfasserin aut Markowski, Marcin verfasserin aut Skwarska, Joanna verfasserin aut Wawrzyniak, Jarosław verfasserin aut Bańbura, Jerzy verfasserin aut Enthalten in Journal für Ornithologie Oxford : Blackwell, 1853 161(2020), 3 vom: 14. März, Seite 819-828 (DE-627)323607284 (DE-600)2026338-7 1439-0361 nnns volume:161 year:2020 number:3 day:14 month:03 pages:819-828 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10336-020-01759-8 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4305 42.83 ASE AR 161 2020 3 14 03 819-828
language	English
source	Enthalten in Journal für Ornithologie 161(2020), 3 vom: 14. März, Seite 819-828 volume:161 year:2020 number:3 day:14 month:03 pages:819-828
sourceStr	Enthalten in Journal für Ornithologie 161(2020), 3 vom: 14. März, Seite 819-828 volume:161 year:2020 number:3 day:14 month:03 pages:819-828
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Nest bacterial load Skin bacterial load Nest replacement Great tit Hemoglobin Nestling condition
dewey-raw	590
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Journal für Ornithologie
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Zabłotni, Agnieszka @@aut@@ Kaliński, Adam @@aut@@ Bańbura, Mirosława @@aut@@ Glądalski, Michał @@aut@@ Markowski, Marcin @@aut@@ Skwarska, Joanna @@aut@@ Wawrzyniak, Jarosław @@aut@@ Bańbura, Jerzy @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2020-03-14T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	323607284
dewey-sort	3590
id	SPR039973050
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR039973050</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220110211502.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10336-020-01759-8</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR039973050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s10336-020-01759-8-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">590</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">42.83</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zabłotni, Agnieszka</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Experimental nest replacement suggests that the bacterial load of nests may mediate nestling physiological condition in cavity nesting Great Tits (Parus major)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Nests of secondary-cavity breeding birds are structures constructed to lay and incubate eggs and raise nestlings to fledging. These nests are characterized by relatively stable conditions, which makes them a suitable habitat for various microorganisms. It has been suggested that bacteria inhabiting nests and nestling skin may affect nestlings both positively and negatively. In this study, nests of Great Tits Parus major were replaced with artificial nests on the fifth day of the nestling phase in two different study sites to create two categories of nests: (i) natural and (ii) artificial with a reduced bacterial load. Four days later, bacterial samples were collected from the nestling skin and from the edge of the nest to assess skin and nest bacterial loads, expressed as colony forming units (CFUs). It was predicted that (i) the previous season occupancy of nest boxes would influence bacterial loads, (ii) the experimental treatment would reduce nest and skin bacterial loads, and (iii) that nest and skin bacterial loads would affect the condition of the nestlings, assessed as the hemoglobin concentration in blood when nestlings were 14 days old. Occupancy in the previous season did not affect the bacterial load. The skin bacterial load was significantly lower in artificial nests, although the nest bacterial load did not differ between natural and artificial nests. Nestlings from artificial nests had higher hemoglobin, and hemoglobin concentration was negatively associated with the nest but not the skin bacterial load. Our results suggest that the bacterial load in nests may negatively affect the physiological condition of avian hosts.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nest bacterial load</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Skin bacterial load</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nest replacement</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Great tit</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Hemoglobin</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nestling condition</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kaliński, Adam</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bańbura, Mirosława</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Glądalski, Michał</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Markowski, Marcin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Skwarska, Joanna</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wawrzyniak, Jarosław</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bańbura, Jerzy</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal für Ornithologie</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford : Blackwell, 1853</subfield><subfield code="g">161(2020), 3 vom: 14. März, Seite 819-828</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)323607284</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2026338-7</subfield><subfield code="x">1439-0361</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:161</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:14</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:819-828</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10336-020-01759-8</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">42.83</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">161</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">14</subfield><subfield code="c">03</subfield><subfield code="h">819-828</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Zabłotni, Agnieszka
spellingShingle	Zabłotni, Agnieszka ddc 590 bkl 42.83 misc Nest bacterial load misc Skin bacterial load misc Nest replacement misc Great tit misc Hemoglobin misc Nestling condition Experimental nest replacement suggests that the bacterial load of nests may mediate nestling physiological condition in cavity nesting Great Tits (Parus major)
authorStr	Zabłotni, Agnieszka
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)323607284
format	electronic Article
dewey-ones	590 - Animals (Zoology)
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	springer
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	1439-0361
topic_title	590 ASE 42.83 bkl Experimental nest replacement suggests that the bacterial load of nests may mediate nestling physiological condition in cavity nesting Great Tits (Parus major) Nest bacterial load (dpeaa)DE-He213 Skin bacterial load (dpeaa)DE-He213 Nest replacement (dpeaa)DE-He213 Great tit (dpeaa)DE-He213 Hemoglobin (dpeaa)DE-He213 Nestling condition (dpeaa)DE-He213
topic	ddc 590 bkl 42.83 misc Nest bacterial load misc Skin bacterial load misc Nest replacement misc Great tit misc Hemoglobin misc Nestling condition
topic_unstemmed	ddc 590 bkl 42.83 misc Nest bacterial load misc Skin bacterial load misc Nest replacement misc Great tit misc Hemoglobin misc Nestling condition
topic_browse	ddc 590 bkl 42.83 misc Nest bacterial load misc Skin bacterial load misc Nest replacement misc Great tit misc Hemoglobin misc Nestling condition
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Journal für Ornithologie
hierarchy_parent_id	323607284
dewey-tens	590 - Animals (Zoology)
hierarchy_top_title	Journal für Ornithologie
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)323607284 (DE-600)2026338-7
title	Experimental nest replacement suggests that the bacterial load of nests may mediate nestling physiological condition in cavity nesting Great Tits (Parus major)
ctrlnum	(DE-627)SPR039973050 (SPR)s10336-020-01759-8-e
title_full	Experimental nest replacement suggests that the bacterial load of nests may mediate nestling physiological condition in cavity nesting Great Tits (Parus major)
author_sort	Zabłotni, Agnieszka
journal	Journal für Ornithologie
journalStr	Journal für Ornithologie
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
dewey-hundreds	500 - Science
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2020
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	819
author_browse	Zabłotni, Agnieszka Kaliński, Adam Bańbura, Mirosława Glądalski, Michał Markowski, Marcin Skwarska, Joanna Wawrzyniak, Jarosław Bańbura, Jerzy
container_volume	161
class	590 ASE 42.83 bkl
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Zabłotni, Agnieszka
doi_str_mv	10.1007/s10336-020-01759-8
dewey-full	590
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	experimental nest replacement suggests that the bacterial load of nests may mediate nestling physiological condition in cavity nesting great tits (parus major)
title_auth	Experimental nest replacement suggests that the bacterial load of nests may mediate nestling physiological condition in cavity nesting Great Tits (Parus major)
abstract	Abstract Nests of secondary-cavity breeding birds are structures constructed to lay and incubate eggs and raise nestlings to fledging. These nests are characterized by relatively stable conditions, which makes them a suitable habitat for various microorganisms. It has been suggested that bacteria inhabiting nests and nestling skin may affect nestlings both positively and negatively. In this study, nests of Great Tits Parus major were replaced with artificial nests on the fifth day of the nestling phase in two different study sites to create two categories of nests: (i) natural and (ii) artificial with a reduced bacterial load. Four days later, bacterial samples were collected from the nestling skin and from the edge of the nest to assess skin and nest bacterial loads, expressed as colony forming units (CFUs). It was predicted that (i) the previous season occupancy of nest boxes would influence bacterial loads, (ii) the experimental treatment would reduce nest and skin bacterial loads, and (iii) that nest and skin bacterial loads would affect the condition of the nestlings, assessed as the hemoglobin concentration in blood when nestlings were 14 days old. Occupancy in the previous season did not affect the bacterial load. The skin bacterial load was significantly lower in artificial nests, although the nest bacterial load did not differ between natural and artificial nests. Nestlings from artificial nests had higher hemoglobin, and hemoglobin concentration was negatively associated with the nest but not the skin bacterial load. Our results suggest that the bacterial load in nests may negatively affect the physiological condition of avian hosts.
abstractGer	Abstract Nests of secondary-cavity breeding birds are structures constructed to lay and incubate eggs and raise nestlings to fledging. These nests are characterized by relatively stable conditions, which makes them a suitable habitat for various microorganisms. It has been suggested that bacteria inhabiting nests and nestling skin may affect nestlings both positively and negatively. In this study, nests of Great Tits Parus major were replaced with artificial nests on the fifth day of the nestling phase in two different study sites to create two categories of nests: (i) natural and (ii) artificial with a reduced bacterial load. Four days later, bacterial samples were collected from the nestling skin and from the edge of the nest to assess skin and nest bacterial loads, expressed as colony forming units (CFUs). It was predicted that (i) the previous season occupancy of nest boxes would influence bacterial loads, (ii) the experimental treatment would reduce nest and skin bacterial loads, and (iii) that nest and skin bacterial loads would affect the condition of the nestlings, assessed as the hemoglobin concentration in blood when nestlings were 14 days old. Occupancy in the previous season did not affect the bacterial load. The skin bacterial load was significantly lower in artificial nests, although the nest bacterial load did not differ between natural and artificial nests. Nestlings from artificial nests had higher hemoglobin, and hemoglobin concentration was negatively associated with the nest but not the skin bacterial load. Our results suggest that the bacterial load in nests may negatively affect the physiological condition of avian hosts.
abstract_unstemmed	Abstract Nests of secondary-cavity breeding birds are structures constructed to lay and incubate eggs and raise nestlings to fledging. These nests are characterized by relatively stable conditions, which makes them a suitable habitat for various microorganisms. It has been suggested that bacteria inhabiting nests and nestling skin may affect nestlings both positively and negatively. In this study, nests of Great Tits Parus major were replaced with artificial nests on the fifth day of the nestling phase in two different study sites to create two categories of nests: (i) natural and (ii) artificial with a reduced bacterial load. Four days later, bacterial samples were collected from the nestling skin and from the edge of the nest to assess skin and nest bacterial loads, expressed as colony forming units (CFUs). It was predicted that (i) the previous season occupancy of nest boxes would influence bacterial loads, (ii) the experimental treatment would reduce nest and skin bacterial loads, and (iii) that nest and skin bacterial loads would affect the condition of the nestlings, assessed as the hemoglobin concentration in blood when nestlings were 14 days old. Occupancy in the previous season did not affect the bacterial load. The skin bacterial load was significantly lower in artificial nests, although the nest bacterial load did not differ between natural and artificial nests. Nestlings from artificial nests had higher hemoglobin, and hemoglobin concentration was negatively associated with the nest but not the skin bacterial load. Our results suggest that the bacterial load in nests may negatively affect the physiological condition of avian hosts.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4305
container_issue	3
title_short	Experimental nest replacement suggests that the bacterial load of nests may mediate nestling physiological condition in cavity nesting Great Tits (Parus major)
url	https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10336-020-01759-8
remote_bool	true
author2	Kaliński, Adam Bańbura, Mirosława Glądalski, Michał Markowski, Marcin Skwarska, Joanna Wawrzyniak, Jarosław Bańbura, Jerzy
author2Str	Kaliński, Adam Bańbura, Mirosława Glądalski, Michał Markowski, Marcin Skwarska, Joanna Wawrzyniak, Jarosław Bańbura, Jerzy
ppnlink	323607284
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1007/s10336-020-01759-8
up_date	2024-07-04T02:21:47.066Z
_version_	1803613327399583744
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR039973050</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220110211502.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10336-020-01759-8</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR039973050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s10336-020-01759-8-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">590</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">42.83</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zabłotni, Agnieszka</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Experimental nest replacement suggests that the bacterial load of nests may mediate nestling physiological condition in cavity nesting Great Tits (Parus major)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Nests of secondary-cavity breeding birds are structures constructed to lay and incubate eggs and raise nestlings to fledging. These nests are characterized by relatively stable conditions, which makes them a suitable habitat for various microorganisms. It has been suggested that bacteria inhabiting nests and nestling skin may affect nestlings both positively and negatively. In this study, nests of Great Tits Parus major were replaced with artificial nests on the fifth day of the nestling phase in two different study sites to create two categories of nests: (i) natural and (ii) artificial with a reduced bacterial load. Four days later, bacterial samples were collected from the nestling skin and from the edge of the nest to assess skin and nest bacterial loads, expressed as colony forming units (CFUs). It was predicted that (i) the previous season occupancy of nest boxes would influence bacterial loads, (ii) the experimental treatment would reduce nest and skin bacterial loads, and (iii) that nest and skin bacterial loads would affect the condition of the nestlings, assessed as the hemoglobin concentration in blood when nestlings were 14 days old. Occupancy in the previous season did not affect the bacterial load. The skin bacterial load was significantly lower in artificial nests, although the nest bacterial load did not differ between natural and artificial nests. Nestlings from artificial nests had higher hemoglobin, and hemoglobin concentration was negatively associated with the nest but not the skin bacterial load. Our results suggest that the bacterial load in nests may negatively affect the physiological condition of avian hosts.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nest bacterial load</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Skin bacterial load</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nest replacement</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Great tit</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Hemoglobin</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nestling condition</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kaliński, Adam</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bańbura, Mirosława</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Glądalski, Michał</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Markowski, Marcin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Skwarska, Joanna</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wawrzyniak, Jarosław</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bańbura, Jerzy</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal für Ornithologie</subfield><subfield code="d">Oxford : Blackwell, 1853</subfield><subfield code="g">161(2020), 3 vom: 14. März, Seite 819-828</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)323607284</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2026338-7</subfield><subfield code="x">1439-0361</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:161</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:14</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:819-828</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10336-020-01759-8</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">42.83</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">161</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">14</subfield><subfield code="c">03</subfield><subfield code="h">819-828</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.401078

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Experimental nest replacement suggests that the bacterial load of nests may mediate nestling physiological condition in cavity nesting Great Tits (Parus major)

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?