Estimation of the recharging rate of groundwater using random forest technique
Abstract Accurate knowledge of the recharging rate is essential for several groundwater-related studies and projects mainly in the water scarcity regions. In this study, a comparison between different methods of soft computing-based models was obtained in order to evaluate and select the most suitab...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Sihag, Parveen [verfasserIn] Angelaki, Anastasia [verfasserIn] Chaplot, Barkha [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2020 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Applied water science - Berlin : Springer, 2011, 10(2020), 7 vom: 03. Juli |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:10 ; year:2020 ; number:7 ; day:03 ; month:07 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
SPR04023343X |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | SPR04023343X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220111190608.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 201007s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)SPR04023343X | ||
035 | |a (SPR)s13201-020-01267-3-e | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 550 |q ASE |
100 | 1 | |a Sihag, Parveen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Estimation of the recharging rate of groundwater using random forest technique |
264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Abstract Accurate knowledge of the recharging rate is essential for several groundwater-related studies and projects mainly in the water scarcity regions. In this study, a comparison between different methods of soft computing-based models was obtained in order to evaluate and select the most suitable and accurate method for predicting the recharging rate of groundwater, as the natural recharging rate of the groundwater is important in efficient groundwater resource management and aquifer recharge. Experimental data have been used to investigate the improved performance of Gaussian process (GP), M5P and random forest (RF)-based regression method and evaluate the potential of these techniques in the prediction of natural recharging rate. The study also compares the prediction of recharging rate to empirical (Kostiakov model, multilinear regression, multi-nonlinear regression) equations. The RF method was selected for the recharging rate prediction and was compared with the M5P tree, GP and also empirical models. While GP, M5P tree and empirical models provide good quality of prediction performance, RF model showed superiority among them with coefficient of correlation (R) values as 0.98 and 0.91 for training and testing, respectively. Out of 106 observations collected from laboratory experiments, 73 were used for developing different models, whereas rest 33 observations were used for the assessment of the models’ performance. Sensitivity analysis recommends that time parameter (t) is the main influencing parameter, which is crucial for the prediction of the recharging rate. RF-based model is suitable for accurate prediction of recharging rate of groundwater. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Recharging rate |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Random forest |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Gaussian process regression |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a M5P tree |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
700 | 1 | |a Angelaki, Anastasia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Chaplot, Barkha |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Applied water science |d Berlin : Springer, 2011 |g 10(2020), 7 vom: 03. Juli |w (DE-627)64730242X |w (DE-600)2594789-8 |x 2190-5495 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:10 |g year:2020 |g number:7 |g day:03 |g month:07 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3 |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2147 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2148 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 10 |j 2020 |e 7 |b 03 |c 07 |
author_variant |
p s ps a a aa b c bc |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:21905495:2020----::siainfhrcagnrtogonwtrsnrn |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2020 |
publishDate |
2020 |
allfields |
10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3 doi (DE-627)SPR04023343X (SPR)s13201-020-01267-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 ASE Sihag, Parveen verfasserin aut Estimation of the recharging rate of groundwater using random forest technique 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Accurate knowledge of the recharging rate is essential for several groundwater-related studies and projects mainly in the water scarcity regions. In this study, a comparison between different methods of soft computing-based models was obtained in order to evaluate and select the most suitable and accurate method for predicting the recharging rate of groundwater, as the natural recharging rate of the groundwater is important in efficient groundwater resource management and aquifer recharge. Experimental data have been used to investigate the improved performance of Gaussian process (GP), M5P and random forest (RF)-based regression method and evaluate the potential of these techniques in the prediction of natural recharging rate. The study also compares the prediction of recharging rate to empirical (Kostiakov model, multilinear regression, multi-nonlinear regression) equations. The RF method was selected for the recharging rate prediction and was compared with the M5P tree, GP and also empirical models. While GP, M5P tree and empirical models provide good quality of prediction performance, RF model showed superiority among them with coefficient of correlation (R) values as 0.98 and 0.91 for training and testing, respectively. Out of 106 observations collected from laboratory experiments, 73 were used for developing different models, whereas rest 33 observations were used for the assessment of the models’ performance. Sensitivity analysis recommends that time parameter (t) is the main influencing parameter, which is crucial for the prediction of the recharging rate. RF-based model is suitable for accurate prediction of recharging rate of groundwater. Recharging rate (dpeaa)DE-He213 Random forest (dpeaa)DE-He213 Gaussian process regression (dpeaa)DE-He213 M5P tree (dpeaa)DE-He213 Angelaki, Anastasia verfasserin aut Chaplot, Barkha verfasserin aut Enthalten in Applied water science Berlin : Springer, 2011 10(2020), 7 vom: 03. Juli (DE-627)64730242X (DE-600)2594789-8 2190-5495 nnns volume:10 year:2020 number:7 day:03 month:07 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2020 7 03 07 |
spelling |
10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3 doi (DE-627)SPR04023343X (SPR)s13201-020-01267-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 ASE Sihag, Parveen verfasserin aut Estimation of the recharging rate of groundwater using random forest technique 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Accurate knowledge of the recharging rate is essential for several groundwater-related studies and projects mainly in the water scarcity regions. In this study, a comparison between different methods of soft computing-based models was obtained in order to evaluate and select the most suitable and accurate method for predicting the recharging rate of groundwater, as the natural recharging rate of the groundwater is important in efficient groundwater resource management and aquifer recharge. Experimental data have been used to investigate the improved performance of Gaussian process (GP), M5P and random forest (RF)-based regression method and evaluate the potential of these techniques in the prediction of natural recharging rate. The study also compares the prediction of recharging rate to empirical (Kostiakov model, multilinear regression, multi-nonlinear regression) equations. The RF method was selected for the recharging rate prediction and was compared with the M5P tree, GP and also empirical models. While GP, M5P tree and empirical models provide good quality of prediction performance, RF model showed superiority among them with coefficient of correlation (R) values as 0.98 and 0.91 for training and testing, respectively. Out of 106 observations collected from laboratory experiments, 73 were used for developing different models, whereas rest 33 observations were used for the assessment of the models’ performance. Sensitivity analysis recommends that time parameter (t) is the main influencing parameter, which is crucial for the prediction of the recharging rate. RF-based model is suitable for accurate prediction of recharging rate of groundwater. Recharging rate (dpeaa)DE-He213 Random forest (dpeaa)DE-He213 Gaussian process regression (dpeaa)DE-He213 M5P tree (dpeaa)DE-He213 Angelaki, Anastasia verfasserin aut Chaplot, Barkha verfasserin aut Enthalten in Applied water science Berlin : Springer, 2011 10(2020), 7 vom: 03. Juli (DE-627)64730242X (DE-600)2594789-8 2190-5495 nnns volume:10 year:2020 number:7 day:03 month:07 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2020 7 03 07 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3 doi (DE-627)SPR04023343X (SPR)s13201-020-01267-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 ASE Sihag, Parveen verfasserin aut Estimation of the recharging rate of groundwater using random forest technique 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Accurate knowledge of the recharging rate is essential for several groundwater-related studies and projects mainly in the water scarcity regions. In this study, a comparison between different methods of soft computing-based models was obtained in order to evaluate and select the most suitable and accurate method for predicting the recharging rate of groundwater, as the natural recharging rate of the groundwater is important in efficient groundwater resource management and aquifer recharge. Experimental data have been used to investigate the improved performance of Gaussian process (GP), M5P and random forest (RF)-based regression method and evaluate the potential of these techniques in the prediction of natural recharging rate. The study also compares the prediction of recharging rate to empirical (Kostiakov model, multilinear regression, multi-nonlinear regression) equations. The RF method was selected for the recharging rate prediction and was compared with the M5P tree, GP and also empirical models. While GP, M5P tree and empirical models provide good quality of prediction performance, RF model showed superiority among them with coefficient of correlation (R) values as 0.98 and 0.91 for training and testing, respectively. Out of 106 observations collected from laboratory experiments, 73 were used for developing different models, whereas rest 33 observations were used for the assessment of the models’ performance. Sensitivity analysis recommends that time parameter (t) is the main influencing parameter, which is crucial for the prediction of the recharging rate. RF-based model is suitable for accurate prediction of recharging rate of groundwater. Recharging rate (dpeaa)DE-He213 Random forest (dpeaa)DE-He213 Gaussian process regression (dpeaa)DE-He213 M5P tree (dpeaa)DE-He213 Angelaki, Anastasia verfasserin aut Chaplot, Barkha verfasserin aut Enthalten in Applied water science Berlin : Springer, 2011 10(2020), 7 vom: 03. Juli (DE-627)64730242X (DE-600)2594789-8 2190-5495 nnns volume:10 year:2020 number:7 day:03 month:07 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2020 7 03 07 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3 doi (DE-627)SPR04023343X (SPR)s13201-020-01267-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 ASE Sihag, Parveen verfasserin aut Estimation of the recharging rate of groundwater using random forest technique 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Accurate knowledge of the recharging rate is essential for several groundwater-related studies and projects mainly in the water scarcity regions. In this study, a comparison between different methods of soft computing-based models was obtained in order to evaluate and select the most suitable and accurate method for predicting the recharging rate of groundwater, as the natural recharging rate of the groundwater is important in efficient groundwater resource management and aquifer recharge. Experimental data have been used to investigate the improved performance of Gaussian process (GP), M5P and random forest (RF)-based regression method and evaluate the potential of these techniques in the prediction of natural recharging rate. The study also compares the prediction of recharging rate to empirical (Kostiakov model, multilinear regression, multi-nonlinear regression) equations. The RF method was selected for the recharging rate prediction and was compared with the M5P tree, GP and also empirical models. While GP, M5P tree and empirical models provide good quality of prediction performance, RF model showed superiority among them with coefficient of correlation (R) values as 0.98 and 0.91 for training and testing, respectively. Out of 106 observations collected from laboratory experiments, 73 were used for developing different models, whereas rest 33 observations were used for the assessment of the models’ performance. Sensitivity analysis recommends that time parameter (t) is the main influencing parameter, which is crucial for the prediction of the recharging rate. RF-based model is suitable for accurate prediction of recharging rate of groundwater. Recharging rate (dpeaa)DE-He213 Random forest (dpeaa)DE-He213 Gaussian process regression (dpeaa)DE-He213 M5P tree (dpeaa)DE-He213 Angelaki, Anastasia verfasserin aut Chaplot, Barkha verfasserin aut Enthalten in Applied water science Berlin : Springer, 2011 10(2020), 7 vom: 03. Juli (DE-627)64730242X (DE-600)2594789-8 2190-5495 nnns volume:10 year:2020 number:7 day:03 month:07 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2020 7 03 07 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3 doi (DE-627)SPR04023343X (SPR)s13201-020-01267-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 ASE Sihag, Parveen verfasserin aut Estimation of the recharging rate of groundwater using random forest technique 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Accurate knowledge of the recharging rate is essential for several groundwater-related studies and projects mainly in the water scarcity regions. In this study, a comparison between different methods of soft computing-based models was obtained in order to evaluate and select the most suitable and accurate method for predicting the recharging rate of groundwater, as the natural recharging rate of the groundwater is important in efficient groundwater resource management and aquifer recharge. Experimental data have been used to investigate the improved performance of Gaussian process (GP), M5P and random forest (RF)-based regression method and evaluate the potential of these techniques in the prediction of natural recharging rate. The study also compares the prediction of recharging rate to empirical (Kostiakov model, multilinear regression, multi-nonlinear regression) equations. The RF method was selected for the recharging rate prediction and was compared with the M5P tree, GP and also empirical models. While GP, M5P tree and empirical models provide good quality of prediction performance, RF model showed superiority among them with coefficient of correlation (R) values as 0.98 and 0.91 for training and testing, respectively. Out of 106 observations collected from laboratory experiments, 73 were used for developing different models, whereas rest 33 observations were used for the assessment of the models’ performance. Sensitivity analysis recommends that time parameter (t) is the main influencing parameter, which is crucial for the prediction of the recharging rate. RF-based model is suitable for accurate prediction of recharging rate of groundwater. Recharging rate (dpeaa)DE-He213 Random forest (dpeaa)DE-He213 Gaussian process regression (dpeaa)DE-He213 M5P tree (dpeaa)DE-He213 Angelaki, Anastasia verfasserin aut Chaplot, Barkha verfasserin aut Enthalten in Applied water science Berlin : Springer, 2011 10(2020), 7 vom: 03. Juli (DE-627)64730242X (DE-600)2594789-8 2190-5495 nnns volume:10 year:2020 number:7 day:03 month:07 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2020 7 03 07 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Applied water science 10(2020), 7 vom: 03. Juli volume:10 year:2020 number:7 day:03 month:07 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Applied water science 10(2020), 7 vom: 03. Juli volume:10 year:2020 number:7 day:03 month:07 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Recharging rate Random forest Gaussian process regression M5P tree |
dewey-raw |
550 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Applied water science |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Sihag, Parveen @@aut@@ Angelaki, Anastasia @@aut@@ Chaplot, Barkha @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-07-03T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
64730242X |
dewey-sort |
3550 |
id |
SPR04023343X |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR04023343X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220111190608.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR04023343X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s13201-020-01267-3-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sihag, Parveen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Estimation of the recharging rate of groundwater using random forest technique</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Accurate knowledge of the recharging rate is essential for several groundwater-related studies and projects mainly in the water scarcity regions. In this study, a comparison between different methods of soft computing-based models was obtained in order to evaluate and select the most suitable and accurate method for predicting the recharging rate of groundwater, as the natural recharging rate of the groundwater is important in efficient groundwater resource management and aquifer recharge. Experimental data have been used to investigate the improved performance of Gaussian process (GP), M5P and random forest (RF)-based regression method and evaluate the potential of these techniques in the prediction of natural recharging rate. The study also compares the prediction of recharging rate to empirical (Kostiakov model, multilinear regression, multi-nonlinear regression) equations. The RF method was selected for the recharging rate prediction and was compared with the M5P tree, GP and also empirical models. While GP, M5P tree and empirical models provide good quality of prediction performance, RF model showed superiority among them with coefficient of correlation (R) values as 0.98 and 0.91 for training and testing, respectively. Out of 106 observations collected from laboratory experiments, 73 were used for developing different models, whereas rest 33 observations were used for the assessment of the models’ performance. Sensitivity analysis recommends that time parameter (t) is the main influencing parameter, which is crucial for the prediction of the recharging rate. RF-based model is suitable for accurate prediction of recharging rate of groundwater.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recharging rate</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Random forest</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Gaussian process regression</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">M5P tree</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Angelaki, Anastasia</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chaplot, Barkha</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Applied water science</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : Springer, 2011</subfield><subfield code="g">10(2020), 7 vom: 03. Juli</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)64730242X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2594789-8</subfield><subfield code="x">2190-5495</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:10</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:7</subfield><subfield code="g">day:03</subfield><subfield code="g">month:07</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">10</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">7</subfield><subfield code="b">03</subfield><subfield code="c">07</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Sihag, Parveen |
spellingShingle |
Sihag, Parveen ddc 550 misc Recharging rate misc Random forest misc Gaussian process regression misc M5P tree Estimation of the recharging rate of groundwater using random forest technique |
authorStr |
Sihag, Parveen |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)64730242X |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
550 - Earth sciences |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut |
collection |
springer |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
2190-5495 |
topic_title |
550 ASE Estimation of the recharging rate of groundwater using random forest technique Recharging rate (dpeaa)DE-He213 Random forest (dpeaa)DE-He213 Gaussian process regression (dpeaa)DE-He213 M5P tree (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
topic |
ddc 550 misc Recharging rate misc Random forest misc Gaussian process regression misc M5P tree |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 550 misc Recharging rate misc Random forest misc Gaussian process regression misc M5P tree |
topic_browse |
ddc 550 misc Recharging rate misc Random forest misc Gaussian process regression misc M5P tree |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Applied water science |
hierarchy_parent_id |
64730242X |
dewey-tens |
550 - Earth sciences & geology |
hierarchy_top_title |
Applied water science |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)64730242X (DE-600)2594789-8 |
title |
Estimation of the recharging rate of groundwater using random forest technique |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR04023343X (SPR)s13201-020-01267-3-e |
title_full |
Estimation of the recharging rate of groundwater using random forest technique |
author_sort |
Sihag, Parveen |
journal |
Applied water science |
journalStr |
Applied water science |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2020 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
author_browse |
Sihag, Parveen Angelaki, Anastasia Chaplot, Barkha |
container_volume |
10 |
class |
550 ASE |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Sihag, Parveen |
doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3 |
dewey-full |
550 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
estimation of the recharging rate of groundwater using random forest technique |
title_auth |
Estimation of the recharging rate of groundwater using random forest technique |
abstract |
Abstract Accurate knowledge of the recharging rate is essential for several groundwater-related studies and projects mainly in the water scarcity regions. In this study, a comparison between different methods of soft computing-based models was obtained in order to evaluate and select the most suitable and accurate method for predicting the recharging rate of groundwater, as the natural recharging rate of the groundwater is important in efficient groundwater resource management and aquifer recharge. Experimental data have been used to investigate the improved performance of Gaussian process (GP), M5P and random forest (RF)-based regression method and evaluate the potential of these techniques in the prediction of natural recharging rate. The study also compares the prediction of recharging rate to empirical (Kostiakov model, multilinear regression, multi-nonlinear regression) equations. The RF method was selected for the recharging rate prediction and was compared with the M5P tree, GP and also empirical models. While GP, M5P tree and empirical models provide good quality of prediction performance, RF model showed superiority among them with coefficient of correlation (R) values as 0.98 and 0.91 for training and testing, respectively. Out of 106 observations collected from laboratory experiments, 73 were used for developing different models, whereas rest 33 observations were used for the assessment of the models’ performance. Sensitivity analysis recommends that time parameter (t) is the main influencing parameter, which is crucial for the prediction of the recharging rate. RF-based model is suitable for accurate prediction of recharging rate of groundwater. |
abstractGer |
Abstract Accurate knowledge of the recharging rate is essential for several groundwater-related studies and projects mainly in the water scarcity regions. In this study, a comparison between different methods of soft computing-based models was obtained in order to evaluate and select the most suitable and accurate method for predicting the recharging rate of groundwater, as the natural recharging rate of the groundwater is important in efficient groundwater resource management and aquifer recharge. Experimental data have been used to investigate the improved performance of Gaussian process (GP), M5P and random forest (RF)-based regression method and evaluate the potential of these techniques in the prediction of natural recharging rate. The study also compares the prediction of recharging rate to empirical (Kostiakov model, multilinear regression, multi-nonlinear regression) equations. The RF method was selected for the recharging rate prediction and was compared with the M5P tree, GP and also empirical models. While GP, M5P tree and empirical models provide good quality of prediction performance, RF model showed superiority among them with coefficient of correlation (R) values as 0.98 and 0.91 for training and testing, respectively. Out of 106 observations collected from laboratory experiments, 73 were used for developing different models, whereas rest 33 observations were used for the assessment of the models’ performance. Sensitivity analysis recommends that time parameter (t) is the main influencing parameter, which is crucial for the prediction of the recharging rate. RF-based model is suitable for accurate prediction of recharging rate of groundwater. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Accurate knowledge of the recharging rate is essential for several groundwater-related studies and projects mainly in the water scarcity regions. In this study, a comparison between different methods of soft computing-based models was obtained in order to evaluate and select the most suitable and accurate method for predicting the recharging rate of groundwater, as the natural recharging rate of the groundwater is important in efficient groundwater resource management and aquifer recharge. Experimental data have been used to investigate the improved performance of Gaussian process (GP), M5P and random forest (RF)-based regression method and evaluate the potential of these techniques in the prediction of natural recharging rate. The study also compares the prediction of recharging rate to empirical (Kostiakov model, multilinear regression, multi-nonlinear regression) equations. The RF method was selected for the recharging rate prediction and was compared with the M5P tree, GP and also empirical models. While GP, M5P tree and empirical models provide good quality of prediction performance, RF model showed superiority among them with coefficient of correlation (R) values as 0.98 and 0.91 for training and testing, respectively. Out of 106 observations collected from laboratory experiments, 73 were used for developing different models, whereas rest 33 observations were used for the assessment of the models’ performance. Sensitivity analysis recommends that time parameter (t) is the main influencing parameter, which is crucial for the prediction of the recharging rate. RF-based model is suitable for accurate prediction of recharging rate of groundwater. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
7 |
title_short |
Estimation of the recharging rate of groundwater using random forest technique |
url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Angelaki, Anastasia Chaplot, Barkha |
author2Str |
Angelaki, Anastasia Chaplot, Barkha |
ppnlink |
64730242X |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T14:39:27.991Z |
_version_ |
1803569141372682240 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR04023343X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220111190608.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR04023343X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s13201-020-01267-3-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sihag, Parveen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Estimation of the recharging rate of groundwater using random forest technique</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Accurate knowledge of the recharging rate is essential for several groundwater-related studies and projects mainly in the water scarcity regions. In this study, a comparison between different methods of soft computing-based models was obtained in order to evaluate and select the most suitable and accurate method for predicting the recharging rate of groundwater, as the natural recharging rate of the groundwater is important in efficient groundwater resource management and aquifer recharge. Experimental data have been used to investigate the improved performance of Gaussian process (GP), M5P and random forest (RF)-based regression method and evaluate the potential of these techniques in the prediction of natural recharging rate. The study also compares the prediction of recharging rate to empirical (Kostiakov model, multilinear regression, multi-nonlinear regression) equations. The RF method was selected for the recharging rate prediction and was compared with the M5P tree, GP and also empirical models. While GP, M5P tree and empirical models provide good quality of prediction performance, RF model showed superiority among them with coefficient of correlation (R) values as 0.98 and 0.91 for training and testing, respectively. Out of 106 observations collected from laboratory experiments, 73 were used for developing different models, whereas rest 33 observations were used for the assessment of the models’ performance. Sensitivity analysis recommends that time parameter (t) is the main influencing parameter, which is crucial for the prediction of the recharging rate. RF-based model is suitable for accurate prediction of recharging rate of groundwater.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recharging rate</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Random forest</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Gaussian process regression</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">M5P tree</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Angelaki, Anastasia</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chaplot, Barkha</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Applied water science</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : Springer, 2011</subfield><subfield code="g">10(2020), 7 vom: 03. Juli</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)64730242X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2594789-8</subfield><subfield code="x">2190-5495</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:10</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:7</subfield><subfield code="g">day:03</subfield><subfield code="g">month:07</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">10</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">7</subfield><subfield code="b">03</subfield><subfield code="c">07</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3996468 |