Estimation of the recharging rate of groundwater using random forest technique

Abstract Accurate knowledge of the recharging rate is essential for several groundwater-related studies and projects mainly in the water scarcity regions. In this study, a comparison between different methods of soft computing-based models was obtained in order to evaluate and select the most suitab...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Sihag, Parveen [verfasserIn] Angelaki, Anastasia [verfasserIn] Chaplot, Barkha [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2020

Schlagwörter:	Recharging rate Random forest Gaussian process regression M5P tree

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Applied water science - Berlin : Springer, 2011, 10(2020), 7 vom: 03. Juli
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:10 ; year:2020 ; number:7 ; day:03 ; month:07

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3

Katalog-ID:	SPR04023343X

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	SPR04023343X
003	DE-627
005	20220111190608.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	201007s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)SPR04023343X
035			\|a (SPR)s13201-020-01267-3-e
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 550 \|q ASE
100	1		\|a Sihag, Parveen \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Estimation of the recharging rate of groundwater using random forest technique
264		1	\|c 2020
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Abstract Accurate knowledge of the recharging rate is essential for several groundwater-related studies and projects mainly in the water scarcity regions. In this study, a comparison between different methods of soft computing-based models was obtained in order to evaluate and select the most suitable and accurate method for predicting the recharging rate of groundwater, as the natural recharging rate of the groundwater is important in efficient groundwater resource management and aquifer recharge. Experimental data have been used to investigate the improved performance of Gaussian process (GP), M5P and random forest (RF)-based regression method and evaluate the potential of these techniques in the prediction of natural recharging rate. The study also compares the prediction of recharging rate to empirical (Kostiakov model, multilinear regression, multi-nonlinear regression) equations. The RF method was selected for the recharging rate prediction and was compared with the M5P tree, GP and also empirical models. While GP, M5P tree and empirical models provide good quality of prediction performance, RF model showed superiority among them with coefficient of correlation (R) values as 0.98 and 0.91 for training and testing, respectively. Out of 106 observations collected from laboratory experiments, 73 were used for developing different models, whereas rest 33 observations were used for the assessment of the models’ performance. Sensitivity analysis recommends that time parameter (t) is the main influencing parameter, which is crucial for the prediction of the recharging rate. RF-based model is suitable for accurate prediction of recharging rate of groundwater.
650		4	\|a Recharging rate \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Random forest \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Gaussian process regression \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a M5P tree \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
700	1		\|a Angelaki, Anastasia \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Chaplot, Barkha \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Applied water science \|d Berlin : Springer, 2011 \|g 10(2020), 7 vom: 03. Juli \|w (DE-627)64730242X \|w (DE-600)2594789-8 \|x 2190-5495 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:10 \|g year:2020 \|g number:7 \|g day:03 \|g month:07
856	4	0	\|u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3 \|z kostenfrei \|3 Volltext
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_SPRINGER
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2147
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2148
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 10 \|j 2020 \|e 7 \|b 03 \|c 07

Indexfelder

author_variant	p s ps a a aa b c bc
matchkey_str	article:21905495:2020----::siainfhrcagnrtogonwtrsnrn
hierarchy_sort_str	2020
publishDate	2020
allfields	10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3 doi (DE-627)SPR04023343X (SPR)s13201-020-01267-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 ASE Sihag, Parveen verfasserin aut Estimation of the recharging rate of groundwater using random forest technique 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Accurate knowledge of the recharging rate is essential for several groundwater-related studies and projects mainly in the water scarcity regions. In this study, a comparison between different methods of soft computing-based models was obtained in order to evaluate and select the most suitable and accurate method for predicting the recharging rate of groundwater, as the natural recharging rate of the groundwater is important in efficient groundwater resource management and aquifer recharge. Experimental data have been used to investigate the improved performance of Gaussian process (GP), M5P and random forest (RF)-based regression method and evaluate the potential of these techniques in the prediction of natural recharging rate. The study also compares the prediction of recharging rate to empirical (Kostiakov model, multilinear regression, multi-nonlinear regression) equations. The RF method was selected for the recharging rate prediction and was compared with the M5P tree, GP and also empirical models. While GP, M5P tree and empirical models provide good quality of prediction performance, RF model showed superiority among them with coefficient of correlation (R) values as 0.98 and 0.91 for training and testing, respectively. Out of 106 observations collected from laboratory experiments, 73 were used for developing different models, whereas rest 33 observations were used for the assessment of the models’ performance. Sensitivity analysis recommends that time parameter (t) is the main influencing parameter, which is crucial for the prediction of the recharging rate. RF-based model is suitable for accurate prediction of recharging rate of groundwater. Recharging rate (dpeaa)DE-He213 Random forest (dpeaa)DE-He213 Gaussian process regression (dpeaa)DE-He213 M5P tree (dpeaa)DE-He213 Angelaki, Anastasia verfasserin aut Chaplot, Barkha verfasserin aut Enthalten in Applied water science Berlin : Springer, 2011 10(2020), 7 vom: 03. Juli (DE-627)64730242X (DE-600)2594789-8 2190-5495 nnns volume:10 year:2020 number:7 day:03 month:07 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2020 7 03 07
spelling	10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3 doi (DE-627)SPR04023343X (SPR)s13201-020-01267-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 ASE Sihag, Parveen verfasserin aut Estimation of the recharging rate of groundwater using random forest technique 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Accurate knowledge of the recharging rate is essential for several groundwater-related studies and projects mainly in the water scarcity regions. In this study, a comparison between different methods of soft computing-based models was obtained in order to evaluate and select the most suitable and accurate method for predicting the recharging rate of groundwater, as the natural recharging rate of the groundwater is important in efficient groundwater resource management and aquifer recharge. Experimental data have been used to investigate the improved performance of Gaussian process (GP), M5P and random forest (RF)-based regression method and evaluate the potential of these techniques in the prediction of natural recharging rate. The study also compares the prediction of recharging rate to empirical (Kostiakov model, multilinear regression, multi-nonlinear regression) equations. The RF method was selected for the recharging rate prediction and was compared with the M5P tree, GP and also empirical models. While GP, M5P tree and empirical models provide good quality of prediction performance, RF model showed superiority among them with coefficient of correlation (R) values as 0.98 and 0.91 for training and testing, respectively. Out of 106 observations collected from laboratory experiments, 73 were used for developing different models, whereas rest 33 observations were used for the assessment of the models’ performance. Sensitivity analysis recommends that time parameter (t) is the main influencing parameter, which is crucial for the prediction of the recharging rate. RF-based model is suitable for accurate prediction of recharging rate of groundwater. Recharging rate (dpeaa)DE-He213 Random forest (dpeaa)DE-He213 Gaussian process regression (dpeaa)DE-He213 M5P tree (dpeaa)DE-He213 Angelaki, Anastasia verfasserin aut Chaplot, Barkha verfasserin aut Enthalten in Applied water science Berlin : Springer, 2011 10(2020), 7 vom: 03. Juli (DE-627)64730242X (DE-600)2594789-8 2190-5495 nnns volume:10 year:2020 number:7 day:03 month:07 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2020 7 03 07
allfields_unstemmed	10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3 doi (DE-627)SPR04023343X (SPR)s13201-020-01267-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 ASE Sihag, Parveen verfasserin aut Estimation of the recharging rate of groundwater using random forest technique 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Accurate knowledge of the recharging rate is essential for several groundwater-related studies and projects mainly in the water scarcity regions. In this study, a comparison between different methods of soft computing-based models was obtained in order to evaluate and select the most suitable and accurate method for predicting the recharging rate of groundwater, as the natural recharging rate of the groundwater is important in efficient groundwater resource management and aquifer recharge. Experimental data have been used to investigate the improved performance of Gaussian process (GP), M5P and random forest (RF)-based regression method and evaluate the potential of these techniques in the prediction of natural recharging rate. The study also compares the prediction of recharging rate to empirical (Kostiakov model, multilinear regression, multi-nonlinear regression) equations. The RF method was selected for the recharging rate prediction and was compared with the M5P tree, GP and also empirical models. While GP, M5P tree and empirical models provide good quality of prediction performance, RF model showed superiority among them with coefficient of correlation (R) values as 0.98 and 0.91 for training and testing, respectively. Out of 106 observations collected from laboratory experiments, 73 were used for developing different models, whereas rest 33 observations were used for the assessment of the models’ performance. Sensitivity analysis recommends that time parameter (t) is the main influencing parameter, which is crucial for the prediction of the recharging rate. RF-based model is suitable for accurate prediction of recharging rate of groundwater. Recharging rate (dpeaa)DE-He213 Random forest (dpeaa)DE-He213 Gaussian process regression (dpeaa)DE-He213 M5P tree (dpeaa)DE-He213 Angelaki, Anastasia verfasserin aut Chaplot, Barkha verfasserin aut Enthalten in Applied water science Berlin : Springer, 2011 10(2020), 7 vom: 03. Juli (DE-627)64730242X (DE-600)2594789-8 2190-5495 nnns volume:10 year:2020 number:7 day:03 month:07 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2020 7 03 07
allfieldsGer	10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3 doi (DE-627)SPR04023343X (SPR)s13201-020-01267-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 ASE Sihag, Parveen verfasserin aut Estimation of the recharging rate of groundwater using random forest technique 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Accurate knowledge of the recharging rate is essential for several groundwater-related studies and projects mainly in the water scarcity regions. In this study, a comparison between different methods of soft computing-based models was obtained in order to evaluate and select the most suitable and accurate method for predicting the recharging rate of groundwater, as the natural recharging rate of the groundwater is important in efficient groundwater resource management and aquifer recharge. Experimental data have been used to investigate the improved performance of Gaussian process (GP), M5P and random forest (RF)-based regression method and evaluate the potential of these techniques in the prediction of natural recharging rate. The study also compares the prediction of recharging rate to empirical (Kostiakov model, multilinear regression, multi-nonlinear regression) equations. The RF method was selected for the recharging rate prediction and was compared with the M5P tree, GP and also empirical models. While GP, M5P tree and empirical models provide good quality of prediction performance, RF model showed superiority among them with coefficient of correlation (R) values as 0.98 and 0.91 for training and testing, respectively. Out of 106 observations collected from laboratory experiments, 73 were used for developing different models, whereas rest 33 observations were used for the assessment of the models’ performance. Sensitivity analysis recommends that time parameter (t) is the main influencing parameter, which is crucial for the prediction of the recharging rate. RF-based model is suitable for accurate prediction of recharging rate of groundwater. Recharging rate (dpeaa)DE-He213 Random forest (dpeaa)DE-He213 Gaussian process regression (dpeaa)DE-He213 M5P tree (dpeaa)DE-He213 Angelaki, Anastasia verfasserin aut Chaplot, Barkha verfasserin aut Enthalten in Applied water science Berlin : Springer, 2011 10(2020), 7 vom: 03. Juli (DE-627)64730242X (DE-600)2594789-8 2190-5495 nnns volume:10 year:2020 number:7 day:03 month:07 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2020 7 03 07
allfieldsSound	10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3 doi (DE-627)SPR04023343X (SPR)s13201-020-01267-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 550 ASE Sihag, Parveen verfasserin aut Estimation of the recharging rate of groundwater using random forest technique 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Accurate knowledge of the recharging rate is essential for several groundwater-related studies and projects mainly in the water scarcity regions. In this study, a comparison between different methods of soft computing-based models was obtained in order to evaluate and select the most suitable and accurate method for predicting the recharging rate of groundwater, as the natural recharging rate of the groundwater is important in efficient groundwater resource management and aquifer recharge. Experimental data have been used to investigate the improved performance of Gaussian process (GP), M5P and random forest (RF)-based regression method and evaluate the potential of these techniques in the prediction of natural recharging rate. The study also compares the prediction of recharging rate to empirical (Kostiakov model, multilinear regression, multi-nonlinear regression) equations. The RF method was selected for the recharging rate prediction and was compared with the M5P tree, GP and also empirical models. While GP, M5P tree and empirical models provide good quality of prediction performance, RF model showed superiority among them with coefficient of correlation (R) values as 0.98 and 0.91 for training and testing, respectively. Out of 106 observations collected from laboratory experiments, 73 were used for developing different models, whereas rest 33 observations were used for the assessment of the models’ performance. Sensitivity analysis recommends that time parameter (t) is the main influencing parameter, which is crucial for the prediction of the recharging rate. RF-based model is suitable for accurate prediction of recharging rate of groundwater. Recharging rate (dpeaa)DE-He213 Random forest (dpeaa)DE-He213 Gaussian process regression (dpeaa)DE-He213 M5P tree (dpeaa)DE-He213 Angelaki, Anastasia verfasserin aut Chaplot, Barkha verfasserin aut Enthalten in Applied water science Berlin : Springer, 2011 10(2020), 7 vom: 03. Juli (DE-627)64730242X (DE-600)2594789-8 2190-5495 nnns volume:10 year:2020 number:7 day:03 month:07 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2020 7 03 07
language	English
source	Enthalten in Applied water science 10(2020), 7 vom: 03. Juli volume:10 year:2020 number:7 day:03 month:07
sourceStr	Enthalten in Applied water science 10(2020), 7 vom: 03. Juli volume:10 year:2020 number:7 day:03 month:07
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Recharging rate Random forest Gaussian process regression M5P tree
dewey-raw	550
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Applied water science
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Sihag, Parveen @@aut@@ Angelaki, Anastasia @@aut@@ Chaplot, Barkha @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2020-07-03T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	64730242X
dewey-sort	3550
id	SPR04023343X
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR04023343X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220111190608.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR04023343X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s13201-020-01267-3-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sihag, Parveen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Estimation of the recharging rate of groundwater using random forest technique</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Accurate knowledge of the recharging rate is essential for several groundwater-related studies and projects mainly in the water scarcity regions. In this study, a comparison between different methods of soft computing-based models was obtained in order to evaluate and select the most suitable and accurate method for predicting the recharging rate of groundwater, as the natural recharging rate of the groundwater is important in efficient groundwater resource management and aquifer recharge. Experimental data have been used to investigate the improved performance of Gaussian process (GP), M5P and random forest (RF)-based regression method and evaluate the potential of these techniques in the prediction of natural recharging rate. The study also compares the prediction of recharging rate to empirical (Kostiakov model, multilinear regression, multi-nonlinear regression) equations. The RF method was selected for the recharging rate prediction and was compared with the M5P tree, GP and also empirical models. While GP, M5P tree and empirical models provide good quality of prediction performance, RF model showed superiority among them with coefficient of correlation (R) values as 0.98 and 0.91 for training and testing, respectively. Out of 106 observations collected from laboratory experiments, 73 were used for developing different models, whereas rest 33 observations were used for the assessment of the models’ performance. Sensitivity analysis recommends that time parameter (t) is the main influencing parameter, which is crucial for the prediction of the recharging rate. RF-based model is suitable for accurate prediction of recharging rate of groundwater.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recharging rate</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Random forest</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Gaussian process regression</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">M5P tree</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Angelaki, Anastasia</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chaplot, Barkha</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Applied water science</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : Springer, 2011</subfield><subfield code="g">10(2020), 7 vom: 03. Juli</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)64730242X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2594789-8</subfield><subfield code="x">2190-5495</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:10</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:7</subfield><subfield code="g">day:03</subfield><subfield code="g">month:07</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">10</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">7</subfield><subfield code="b">03</subfield><subfield code="c">07</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Sihag, Parveen
spellingShingle	Sihag, Parveen ddc 550 misc Recharging rate misc Random forest misc Gaussian process regression misc M5P tree Estimation of the recharging rate of groundwater using random forest technique
authorStr	Sihag, Parveen
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)64730242X
format	electronic Article
dewey-ones	550 - Earth sciences
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut
collection	springer
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	2190-5495
topic_title	550 ASE Estimation of the recharging rate of groundwater using random forest technique Recharging rate (dpeaa)DE-He213 Random forest (dpeaa)DE-He213 Gaussian process regression (dpeaa)DE-He213 M5P tree (dpeaa)DE-He213
topic	ddc 550 misc Recharging rate misc Random forest misc Gaussian process regression misc M5P tree
topic_unstemmed	ddc 550 misc Recharging rate misc Random forest misc Gaussian process regression misc M5P tree
topic_browse	ddc 550 misc Recharging rate misc Random forest misc Gaussian process regression misc M5P tree
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Applied water science
hierarchy_parent_id	64730242X
dewey-tens	550 - Earth sciences & geology
hierarchy_top_title	Applied water science
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)64730242X (DE-600)2594789-8
title	Estimation of the recharging rate of groundwater using random forest technique
ctrlnum	(DE-627)SPR04023343X (SPR)s13201-020-01267-3-e
title_full	Estimation of the recharging rate of groundwater using random forest technique
author_sort	Sihag, Parveen
journal	Applied water science
journalStr	Applied water science
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
dewey-hundreds	500 - Science
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2020
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Sihag, Parveen Angelaki, Anastasia Chaplot, Barkha
container_volume	10
class	550 ASE
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Sihag, Parveen
doi_str_mv	10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3
dewey-full	550
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	estimation of the recharging rate of groundwater using random forest technique
title_auth	Estimation of the recharging rate of groundwater using random forest technique
abstract	Abstract Accurate knowledge of the recharging rate is essential for several groundwater-related studies and projects mainly in the water scarcity regions. In this study, a comparison between different methods of soft computing-based models was obtained in order to evaluate and select the most suitable and accurate method for predicting the recharging rate of groundwater, as the natural recharging rate of the groundwater is important in efficient groundwater resource management and aquifer recharge. Experimental data have been used to investigate the improved performance of Gaussian process (GP), M5P and random forest (RF)-based regression method and evaluate the potential of these techniques in the prediction of natural recharging rate. The study also compares the prediction of recharging rate to empirical (Kostiakov model, multilinear regression, multi-nonlinear regression) equations. The RF method was selected for the recharging rate prediction and was compared with the M5P tree, GP and also empirical models. While GP, M5P tree and empirical models provide good quality of prediction performance, RF model showed superiority among them with coefficient of correlation (R) values as 0.98 and 0.91 for training and testing, respectively. Out of 106 observations collected from laboratory experiments, 73 were used for developing different models, whereas rest 33 observations were used for the assessment of the models’ performance. Sensitivity analysis recommends that time parameter (t) is the main influencing parameter, which is crucial for the prediction of the recharging rate. RF-based model is suitable for accurate prediction of recharging rate of groundwater.
abstractGer	Abstract Accurate knowledge of the recharging rate is essential for several groundwater-related studies and projects mainly in the water scarcity regions. In this study, a comparison between different methods of soft computing-based models was obtained in order to evaluate and select the most suitable and accurate method for predicting the recharging rate of groundwater, as the natural recharging rate of the groundwater is important in efficient groundwater resource management and aquifer recharge. Experimental data have been used to investigate the improved performance of Gaussian process (GP), M5P and random forest (RF)-based regression method and evaluate the potential of these techniques in the prediction of natural recharging rate. The study also compares the prediction of recharging rate to empirical (Kostiakov model, multilinear regression, multi-nonlinear regression) equations. The RF method was selected for the recharging rate prediction and was compared with the M5P tree, GP and also empirical models. While GP, M5P tree and empirical models provide good quality of prediction performance, RF model showed superiority among them with coefficient of correlation (R) values as 0.98 and 0.91 for training and testing, respectively. Out of 106 observations collected from laboratory experiments, 73 were used for developing different models, whereas rest 33 observations were used for the assessment of the models’ performance. Sensitivity analysis recommends that time parameter (t) is the main influencing parameter, which is crucial for the prediction of the recharging rate. RF-based model is suitable for accurate prediction of recharging rate of groundwater.
abstract_unstemmed	Abstract Accurate knowledge of the recharging rate is essential for several groundwater-related studies and projects mainly in the water scarcity regions. In this study, a comparison between different methods of soft computing-based models was obtained in order to evaluate and select the most suitable and accurate method for predicting the recharging rate of groundwater, as the natural recharging rate of the groundwater is important in efficient groundwater resource management and aquifer recharge. Experimental data have been used to investigate the improved performance of Gaussian process (GP), M5P and random forest (RF)-based regression method and evaluate the potential of these techniques in the prediction of natural recharging rate. The study also compares the prediction of recharging rate to empirical (Kostiakov model, multilinear regression, multi-nonlinear regression) equations. The RF method was selected for the recharging rate prediction and was compared with the M5P tree, GP and also empirical models. While GP, M5P tree and empirical models provide good quality of prediction performance, RF model showed superiority among them with coefficient of correlation (R) values as 0.98 and 0.91 for training and testing, respectively. Out of 106 observations collected from laboratory experiments, 73 were used for developing different models, whereas rest 33 observations were used for the assessment of the models’ performance. Sensitivity analysis recommends that time parameter (t) is the main influencing parameter, which is crucial for the prediction of the recharging rate. RF-based model is suitable for accurate prediction of recharging rate of groundwater.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	7
title_short	Estimation of the recharging rate of groundwater using random forest technique
url	https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3
remote_bool	true
author2	Angelaki, Anastasia Chaplot, Barkha
author2Str	Angelaki, Anastasia Chaplot, Barkha
ppnlink	64730242X
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3
up_date	2024-07-03T14:39:27.991Z
_version_	1803569141372682240
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR04023343X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220111190608.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR04023343X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s13201-020-01267-3-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">550</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sihag, Parveen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Estimation of the recharging rate of groundwater using random forest technique</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Accurate knowledge of the recharging rate is essential for several groundwater-related studies and projects mainly in the water scarcity regions. In this study, a comparison between different methods of soft computing-based models was obtained in order to evaluate and select the most suitable and accurate method for predicting the recharging rate of groundwater, as the natural recharging rate of the groundwater is important in efficient groundwater resource management and aquifer recharge. Experimental data have been used to investigate the improved performance of Gaussian process (GP), M5P and random forest (RF)-based regression method and evaluate the potential of these techniques in the prediction of natural recharging rate. The study also compares the prediction of recharging rate to empirical (Kostiakov model, multilinear regression, multi-nonlinear regression) equations. The RF method was selected for the recharging rate prediction and was compared with the M5P tree, GP and also empirical models. While GP, M5P tree and empirical models provide good quality of prediction performance, RF model showed superiority among them with coefficient of correlation (R) values as 0.98 and 0.91 for training and testing, respectively. Out of 106 observations collected from laboratory experiments, 73 were used for developing different models, whereas rest 33 observations were used for the assessment of the models’ performance. Sensitivity analysis recommends that time parameter (t) is the main influencing parameter, which is crucial for the prediction of the recharging rate. RF-based model is suitable for accurate prediction of recharging rate of groundwater.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recharging rate</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Random forest</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Gaussian process regression</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">M5P tree</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Angelaki, Anastasia</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chaplot, Barkha</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Applied water science</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : Springer, 2011</subfield><subfield code="g">10(2020), 7 vom: 03. Juli</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)64730242X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2594789-8</subfield><subfield code="x">2190-5495</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:10</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:7</subfield><subfield code="g">day:03</subfield><subfield code="g">month:07</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-01267-3</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">10</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">7</subfield><subfield code="b">03</subfield><subfield code="c">07</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.3996468

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Estimation of the recharging rate of groundwater using random forest technique

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?