Non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears versus anatomic complete arthroscopic repair: a case-control study
Purpose To investigate whether a non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tear (RCT) produces satisfactory clinical outcomes comparable to those of an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair. Methods A retrospective case-control study (prospectively collected data, mean follow-up: 32.7...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Malahias, M.-A. [verfasserIn] Avramidis, G. [verfasserIn] Brilakis, E. [verfasserIn] Trellopoulos, A. [verfasserIn] Antonogiannakis, E. [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2019 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: La Chirurgia degli organi di movimento - Heidelberg : Springer, 2008, 104(2019), 2 vom: 30. Mai, Seite 187-193 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:104 ; year:2019 ; number:2 ; day:30 ; month:05 ; pages:187-193 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s12306-019-00611-4 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
SPR040337901 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | SPR040337901 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230519105107.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 201007s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s12306-019-00611-4 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)SPR040337901 | ||
035 | |a (SPR)s12306-019-00611-4-e | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q ASE |
100 | 1 | |a Malahias, M.-A. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears versus anatomic complete arthroscopic repair: a case-control study |
264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Purpose To investigate whether a non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tear (RCT) produces satisfactory clinical outcomes comparable to those of an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair. Methods A retrospective case-control study (prospectively collected data, mean follow-up: 32.7 months ± 29.5; range 12–80 months) was conducted with patients with massive RCT who underwent either an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair (group A: 34 patients) or a non-anatomic arthroscopic repair (partial repair or medialized repair, group B: 30 patients). The rate of success was calculated primarily by the number of patients per group who achieved a minimal clinically important difference between the preoperative and postoperative values of (a) the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score, (b) the constant score and (c) secondarily, the visual analogue scale (VAS-pain). Active range of motion (shoulder forward flexion, abduction, external rotation in 0° and 90° abduction), muscle strength and external rotation lag sign were also assessed. Results No significant statistical differences amongst groups were found concerning the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. All postoperative clinical and functional scores were significantly improved in both groups (p < 0.001). According to our primary and secondary success rate criteria, both treatments were found to be successful, whereas there was no significant difference amongst them. Conclusions Non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive RCT illustrated satisfactory outcomes, which are not significantly different from those reported after an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Arthroscopic complete repair |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Medialized repair |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Arthroscopic partial repair |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Massive rotator cuff tear |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Anatomic rotator cuff repair |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Non-anatomic rotator cuff repair |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
700 | 1 | |a Avramidis, G. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Brilakis, E. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Trellopoulos, A. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Antonogiannakis, E. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t La Chirurgia degli organi di movimento |d Heidelberg : Springer, 2008 |g 104(2019), 2 vom: 30. Mai, Seite 187-193 |w (DE-627)559430167 |w (DE-600)2412956-2 |x 1973-2538 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:104 |g year:2019 |g number:2 |g day:30 |g month:05 |g pages:187-193 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12306-019-00611-4 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_120 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_152 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_171 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_187 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_250 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_281 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 104 |j 2019 |e 2 |b 30 |c 05 |h 187-193 |
author_variant |
m a m mam g a ga e b eb a t at e a ea |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:19732538:2019----::oaaoiatrsoirpiomsieoaocftasessntmcopeerh |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2019 |
publishDate |
2019 |
allfields |
10.1007/s12306-019-00611-4 doi (DE-627)SPR040337901 (SPR)s12306-019-00611-4-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 ASE Malahias, M.-A. verfasserin aut Non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears versus anatomic complete arthroscopic repair: a case-control study 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Purpose To investigate whether a non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tear (RCT) produces satisfactory clinical outcomes comparable to those of an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair. Methods A retrospective case-control study (prospectively collected data, mean follow-up: 32.7 months ± 29.5; range 12–80 months) was conducted with patients with massive RCT who underwent either an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair (group A: 34 patients) or a non-anatomic arthroscopic repair (partial repair or medialized repair, group B: 30 patients). The rate of success was calculated primarily by the number of patients per group who achieved a minimal clinically important difference between the preoperative and postoperative values of (a) the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score, (b) the constant score and (c) secondarily, the visual analogue scale (VAS-pain). Active range of motion (shoulder forward flexion, abduction, external rotation in 0° and 90° abduction), muscle strength and external rotation lag sign were also assessed. Results No significant statistical differences amongst groups were found concerning the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. All postoperative clinical and functional scores were significantly improved in both groups (p < 0.001). According to our primary and secondary success rate criteria, both treatments were found to be successful, whereas there was no significant difference amongst them. Conclusions Non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive RCT illustrated satisfactory outcomes, which are not significantly different from those reported after an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair. Arthroscopic complete repair (dpeaa)DE-He213 Medialized repair (dpeaa)DE-He213 Arthroscopic partial repair (dpeaa)DE-He213 Massive rotator cuff tear (dpeaa)DE-He213 Anatomic rotator cuff repair (dpeaa)DE-He213 Non-anatomic rotator cuff repair (dpeaa)DE-He213 Avramidis, G. verfasserin aut Brilakis, E. verfasserin aut Trellopoulos, A. verfasserin aut Antonogiannakis, E. verfasserin aut Enthalten in La Chirurgia degli organi di movimento Heidelberg : Springer, 2008 104(2019), 2 vom: 30. Mai, Seite 187-193 (DE-627)559430167 (DE-600)2412956-2 1973-2538 nnns volume:104 year:2019 number:2 day:30 month:05 pages:187-193 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12306-019-00611-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 AR 104 2019 2 30 05 187-193 |
spelling |
10.1007/s12306-019-00611-4 doi (DE-627)SPR040337901 (SPR)s12306-019-00611-4-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 ASE Malahias, M.-A. verfasserin aut Non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears versus anatomic complete arthroscopic repair: a case-control study 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Purpose To investigate whether a non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tear (RCT) produces satisfactory clinical outcomes comparable to those of an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair. Methods A retrospective case-control study (prospectively collected data, mean follow-up: 32.7 months ± 29.5; range 12–80 months) was conducted with patients with massive RCT who underwent either an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair (group A: 34 patients) or a non-anatomic arthroscopic repair (partial repair or medialized repair, group B: 30 patients). The rate of success was calculated primarily by the number of patients per group who achieved a minimal clinically important difference between the preoperative and postoperative values of (a) the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score, (b) the constant score and (c) secondarily, the visual analogue scale (VAS-pain). Active range of motion (shoulder forward flexion, abduction, external rotation in 0° and 90° abduction), muscle strength and external rotation lag sign were also assessed. Results No significant statistical differences amongst groups were found concerning the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. All postoperative clinical and functional scores were significantly improved in both groups (p < 0.001). According to our primary and secondary success rate criteria, both treatments were found to be successful, whereas there was no significant difference amongst them. Conclusions Non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive RCT illustrated satisfactory outcomes, which are not significantly different from those reported after an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair. Arthroscopic complete repair (dpeaa)DE-He213 Medialized repair (dpeaa)DE-He213 Arthroscopic partial repair (dpeaa)DE-He213 Massive rotator cuff tear (dpeaa)DE-He213 Anatomic rotator cuff repair (dpeaa)DE-He213 Non-anatomic rotator cuff repair (dpeaa)DE-He213 Avramidis, G. verfasserin aut Brilakis, E. verfasserin aut Trellopoulos, A. verfasserin aut Antonogiannakis, E. verfasserin aut Enthalten in La Chirurgia degli organi di movimento Heidelberg : Springer, 2008 104(2019), 2 vom: 30. Mai, Seite 187-193 (DE-627)559430167 (DE-600)2412956-2 1973-2538 nnns volume:104 year:2019 number:2 day:30 month:05 pages:187-193 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12306-019-00611-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 AR 104 2019 2 30 05 187-193 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s12306-019-00611-4 doi (DE-627)SPR040337901 (SPR)s12306-019-00611-4-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 ASE Malahias, M.-A. verfasserin aut Non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears versus anatomic complete arthroscopic repair: a case-control study 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Purpose To investigate whether a non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tear (RCT) produces satisfactory clinical outcomes comparable to those of an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair. Methods A retrospective case-control study (prospectively collected data, mean follow-up: 32.7 months ± 29.5; range 12–80 months) was conducted with patients with massive RCT who underwent either an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair (group A: 34 patients) or a non-anatomic arthroscopic repair (partial repair or medialized repair, group B: 30 patients). The rate of success was calculated primarily by the number of patients per group who achieved a minimal clinically important difference between the preoperative and postoperative values of (a) the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score, (b) the constant score and (c) secondarily, the visual analogue scale (VAS-pain). Active range of motion (shoulder forward flexion, abduction, external rotation in 0° and 90° abduction), muscle strength and external rotation lag sign were also assessed. Results No significant statistical differences amongst groups were found concerning the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. All postoperative clinical and functional scores were significantly improved in both groups (p < 0.001). According to our primary and secondary success rate criteria, both treatments were found to be successful, whereas there was no significant difference amongst them. Conclusions Non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive RCT illustrated satisfactory outcomes, which are not significantly different from those reported after an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair. Arthroscopic complete repair (dpeaa)DE-He213 Medialized repair (dpeaa)DE-He213 Arthroscopic partial repair (dpeaa)DE-He213 Massive rotator cuff tear (dpeaa)DE-He213 Anatomic rotator cuff repair (dpeaa)DE-He213 Non-anatomic rotator cuff repair (dpeaa)DE-He213 Avramidis, G. verfasserin aut Brilakis, E. verfasserin aut Trellopoulos, A. verfasserin aut Antonogiannakis, E. verfasserin aut Enthalten in La Chirurgia degli organi di movimento Heidelberg : Springer, 2008 104(2019), 2 vom: 30. Mai, Seite 187-193 (DE-627)559430167 (DE-600)2412956-2 1973-2538 nnns volume:104 year:2019 number:2 day:30 month:05 pages:187-193 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12306-019-00611-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 AR 104 2019 2 30 05 187-193 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s12306-019-00611-4 doi (DE-627)SPR040337901 (SPR)s12306-019-00611-4-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 ASE Malahias, M.-A. verfasserin aut Non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears versus anatomic complete arthroscopic repair: a case-control study 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Purpose To investigate whether a non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tear (RCT) produces satisfactory clinical outcomes comparable to those of an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair. Methods A retrospective case-control study (prospectively collected data, mean follow-up: 32.7 months ± 29.5; range 12–80 months) was conducted with patients with massive RCT who underwent either an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair (group A: 34 patients) or a non-anatomic arthroscopic repair (partial repair or medialized repair, group B: 30 patients). The rate of success was calculated primarily by the number of patients per group who achieved a minimal clinically important difference between the preoperative and postoperative values of (a) the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score, (b) the constant score and (c) secondarily, the visual analogue scale (VAS-pain). Active range of motion (shoulder forward flexion, abduction, external rotation in 0° and 90° abduction), muscle strength and external rotation lag sign were also assessed. Results No significant statistical differences amongst groups were found concerning the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. All postoperative clinical and functional scores were significantly improved in both groups (p < 0.001). According to our primary and secondary success rate criteria, both treatments were found to be successful, whereas there was no significant difference amongst them. Conclusions Non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive RCT illustrated satisfactory outcomes, which are not significantly different from those reported after an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair. Arthroscopic complete repair (dpeaa)DE-He213 Medialized repair (dpeaa)DE-He213 Arthroscopic partial repair (dpeaa)DE-He213 Massive rotator cuff tear (dpeaa)DE-He213 Anatomic rotator cuff repair (dpeaa)DE-He213 Non-anatomic rotator cuff repair (dpeaa)DE-He213 Avramidis, G. verfasserin aut Brilakis, E. verfasserin aut Trellopoulos, A. verfasserin aut Antonogiannakis, E. verfasserin aut Enthalten in La Chirurgia degli organi di movimento Heidelberg : Springer, 2008 104(2019), 2 vom: 30. Mai, Seite 187-193 (DE-627)559430167 (DE-600)2412956-2 1973-2538 nnns volume:104 year:2019 number:2 day:30 month:05 pages:187-193 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12306-019-00611-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 AR 104 2019 2 30 05 187-193 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s12306-019-00611-4 doi (DE-627)SPR040337901 (SPR)s12306-019-00611-4-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 ASE Malahias, M.-A. verfasserin aut Non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears versus anatomic complete arthroscopic repair: a case-control study 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Purpose To investigate whether a non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tear (RCT) produces satisfactory clinical outcomes comparable to those of an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair. Methods A retrospective case-control study (prospectively collected data, mean follow-up: 32.7 months ± 29.5; range 12–80 months) was conducted with patients with massive RCT who underwent either an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair (group A: 34 patients) or a non-anatomic arthroscopic repair (partial repair or medialized repair, group B: 30 patients). The rate of success was calculated primarily by the number of patients per group who achieved a minimal clinically important difference between the preoperative and postoperative values of (a) the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score, (b) the constant score and (c) secondarily, the visual analogue scale (VAS-pain). Active range of motion (shoulder forward flexion, abduction, external rotation in 0° and 90° abduction), muscle strength and external rotation lag sign were also assessed. Results No significant statistical differences amongst groups were found concerning the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. All postoperative clinical and functional scores were significantly improved in both groups (p < 0.001). According to our primary and secondary success rate criteria, both treatments were found to be successful, whereas there was no significant difference amongst them. Conclusions Non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive RCT illustrated satisfactory outcomes, which are not significantly different from those reported after an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair. Arthroscopic complete repair (dpeaa)DE-He213 Medialized repair (dpeaa)DE-He213 Arthroscopic partial repair (dpeaa)DE-He213 Massive rotator cuff tear (dpeaa)DE-He213 Anatomic rotator cuff repair (dpeaa)DE-He213 Non-anatomic rotator cuff repair (dpeaa)DE-He213 Avramidis, G. verfasserin aut Brilakis, E. verfasserin aut Trellopoulos, A. verfasserin aut Antonogiannakis, E. verfasserin aut Enthalten in La Chirurgia degli organi di movimento Heidelberg : Springer, 2008 104(2019), 2 vom: 30. Mai, Seite 187-193 (DE-627)559430167 (DE-600)2412956-2 1973-2538 nnns volume:104 year:2019 number:2 day:30 month:05 pages:187-193 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12306-019-00611-4 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 AR 104 2019 2 30 05 187-193 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in La Chirurgia degli organi di movimento 104(2019), 2 vom: 30. Mai, Seite 187-193 volume:104 year:2019 number:2 day:30 month:05 pages:187-193 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in La Chirurgia degli organi di movimento 104(2019), 2 vom: 30. Mai, Seite 187-193 volume:104 year:2019 number:2 day:30 month:05 pages:187-193 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Arthroscopic complete repair Medialized repair Arthroscopic partial repair Massive rotator cuff tear Anatomic rotator cuff repair Non-anatomic rotator cuff repair |
dewey-raw |
610 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
La Chirurgia degli organi di movimento |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Malahias, M.-A. @@aut@@ Avramidis, G. @@aut@@ Brilakis, E. @@aut@@ Trellopoulos, A. @@aut@@ Antonogiannakis, E. @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2019-05-30T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
559430167 |
dewey-sort |
3610 |
id |
SPR040337901 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR040337901</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519105107.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s12306-019-00611-4</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR040337901</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s12306-019-00611-4-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Malahias, M.-A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears versus anatomic complete arthroscopic repair: a case-control study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Purpose To investigate whether a non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tear (RCT) produces satisfactory clinical outcomes comparable to those of an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair. Methods A retrospective case-control study (prospectively collected data, mean follow-up: 32.7 months ± 29.5; range 12–80 months) was conducted with patients with massive RCT who underwent either an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair (group A: 34 patients) or a non-anatomic arthroscopic repair (partial repair or medialized repair, group B: 30 patients). The rate of success was calculated primarily by the number of patients per group who achieved a minimal clinically important difference between the preoperative and postoperative values of (a) the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score, (b) the constant score and (c) secondarily, the visual analogue scale (VAS-pain). Active range of motion (shoulder forward flexion, abduction, external rotation in 0° and 90° abduction), muscle strength and external rotation lag sign were also assessed. Results No significant statistical differences amongst groups were found concerning the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. All postoperative clinical and functional scores were significantly improved in both groups (p < 0.001). According to our primary and secondary success rate criteria, both treatments were found to be successful, whereas there was no significant difference amongst them. Conclusions Non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive RCT illustrated satisfactory outcomes, which are not significantly different from those reported after an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Arthroscopic complete repair</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Medialized repair</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Arthroscopic partial repair</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Massive rotator cuff tear</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Anatomic rotator cuff repair</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Non-anatomic rotator cuff repair</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Avramidis, G.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Brilakis, E.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Trellopoulos, A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Antonogiannakis, E.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">La Chirurgia degli organi di movimento</subfield><subfield code="d">Heidelberg : Springer, 2008</subfield><subfield code="g">104(2019), 2 vom: 30. Mai, Seite 187-193</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)559430167</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2412956-2</subfield><subfield code="x">1973-2538</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:104</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:30</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:187-193</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12306-019-00611-4</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">104</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">30</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">187-193</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Malahias, M.-A. |
spellingShingle |
Malahias, M.-A. ddc 610 misc Arthroscopic complete repair misc Medialized repair misc Arthroscopic partial repair misc Massive rotator cuff tear misc Anatomic rotator cuff repair misc Non-anatomic rotator cuff repair Non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears versus anatomic complete arthroscopic repair: a case-control study |
authorStr |
Malahias, M.-A. |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)559430167 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
610 - Medicine & health |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
springer |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1973-2538 |
topic_title |
610 ASE Non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears versus anatomic complete arthroscopic repair: a case-control study Arthroscopic complete repair (dpeaa)DE-He213 Medialized repair (dpeaa)DE-He213 Arthroscopic partial repair (dpeaa)DE-He213 Massive rotator cuff tear (dpeaa)DE-He213 Anatomic rotator cuff repair (dpeaa)DE-He213 Non-anatomic rotator cuff repair (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
topic |
ddc 610 misc Arthroscopic complete repair misc Medialized repair misc Arthroscopic partial repair misc Massive rotator cuff tear misc Anatomic rotator cuff repair misc Non-anatomic rotator cuff repair |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 610 misc Arthroscopic complete repair misc Medialized repair misc Arthroscopic partial repair misc Massive rotator cuff tear misc Anatomic rotator cuff repair misc Non-anatomic rotator cuff repair |
topic_browse |
ddc 610 misc Arthroscopic complete repair misc Medialized repair misc Arthroscopic partial repair misc Massive rotator cuff tear misc Anatomic rotator cuff repair misc Non-anatomic rotator cuff repair |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
La Chirurgia degli organi di movimento |
hierarchy_parent_id |
559430167 |
dewey-tens |
610 - Medicine & health |
hierarchy_top_title |
La Chirurgia degli organi di movimento |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)559430167 (DE-600)2412956-2 |
title |
Non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears versus anatomic complete arthroscopic repair: a case-control study |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR040337901 (SPR)s12306-019-00611-4-e |
title_full |
Non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears versus anatomic complete arthroscopic repair: a case-control study |
author_sort |
Malahias, M.-A. |
journal |
La Chirurgia degli organi di movimento |
journalStr |
La Chirurgia degli organi di movimento |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2019 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
187 |
author_browse |
Malahias, M.-A. Avramidis, G. Brilakis, E. Trellopoulos, A. Antonogiannakis, E. |
container_volume |
104 |
class |
610 ASE |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Malahias, M.-A. |
doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s12306-019-00611-4 |
dewey-full |
610 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears versus anatomic complete arthroscopic repair: a case-control study |
title_auth |
Non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears versus anatomic complete arthroscopic repair: a case-control study |
abstract |
Purpose To investigate whether a non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tear (RCT) produces satisfactory clinical outcomes comparable to those of an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair. Methods A retrospective case-control study (prospectively collected data, mean follow-up: 32.7 months ± 29.5; range 12–80 months) was conducted with patients with massive RCT who underwent either an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair (group A: 34 patients) or a non-anatomic arthroscopic repair (partial repair or medialized repair, group B: 30 patients). The rate of success was calculated primarily by the number of patients per group who achieved a minimal clinically important difference between the preoperative and postoperative values of (a) the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score, (b) the constant score and (c) secondarily, the visual analogue scale (VAS-pain). Active range of motion (shoulder forward flexion, abduction, external rotation in 0° and 90° abduction), muscle strength and external rotation lag sign were also assessed. Results No significant statistical differences amongst groups were found concerning the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. All postoperative clinical and functional scores were significantly improved in both groups (p < 0.001). According to our primary and secondary success rate criteria, both treatments were found to be successful, whereas there was no significant difference amongst them. Conclusions Non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive RCT illustrated satisfactory outcomes, which are not significantly different from those reported after an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair. |
abstractGer |
Purpose To investigate whether a non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tear (RCT) produces satisfactory clinical outcomes comparable to those of an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair. Methods A retrospective case-control study (prospectively collected data, mean follow-up: 32.7 months ± 29.5; range 12–80 months) was conducted with patients with massive RCT who underwent either an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair (group A: 34 patients) or a non-anatomic arthroscopic repair (partial repair or medialized repair, group B: 30 patients). The rate of success was calculated primarily by the number of patients per group who achieved a minimal clinically important difference between the preoperative and postoperative values of (a) the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score, (b) the constant score and (c) secondarily, the visual analogue scale (VAS-pain). Active range of motion (shoulder forward flexion, abduction, external rotation in 0° and 90° abduction), muscle strength and external rotation lag sign were also assessed. Results No significant statistical differences amongst groups were found concerning the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. All postoperative clinical and functional scores were significantly improved in both groups (p < 0.001). According to our primary and secondary success rate criteria, both treatments were found to be successful, whereas there was no significant difference amongst them. Conclusions Non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive RCT illustrated satisfactory outcomes, which are not significantly different from those reported after an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Purpose To investigate whether a non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tear (RCT) produces satisfactory clinical outcomes comparable to those of an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair. Methods A retrospective case-control study (prospectively collected data, mean follow-up: 32.7 months ± 29.5; range 12–80 months) was conducted with patients with massive RCT who underwent either an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair (group A: 34 patients) or a non-anatomic arthroscopic repair (partial repair or medialized repair, group B: 30 patients). The rate of success was calculated primarily by the number of patients per group who achieved a minimal clinically important difference between the preoperative and postoperative values of (a) the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score, (b) the constant score and (c) secondarily, the visual analogue scale (VAS-pain). Active range of motion (shoulder forward flexion, abduction, external rotation in 0° and 90° abduction), muscle strength and external rotation lag sign were also assessed. Results No significant statistical differences amongst groups were found concerning the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. All postoperative clinical and functional scores were significantly improved in both groups (p < 0.001). According to our primary and secondary success rate criteria, both treatments were found to be successful, whereas there was no significant difference amongst them. Conclusions Non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive RCT illustrated satisfactory outcomes, which are not significantly different from those reported after an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 |
container_issue |
2 |
title_short |
Non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears versus anatomic complete arthroscopic repair: a case-control study |
url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12306-019-00611-4 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Avramidis, G. Brilakis, E. Trellopoulos, A. Antonogiannakis, E. |
author2Str |
Avramidis, G. Brilakis, E. Trellopoulos, A. Antonogiannakis, E. |
ppnlink |
559430167 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1007/s12306-019-00611-4 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T15:20:02.242Z |
_version_ |
1803571693879296000 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR040337901</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519105107.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s12306-019-00611-4</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR040337901</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s12306-019-00611-4-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Malahias, M.-A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears versus anatomic complete arthroscopic repair: a case-control study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Purpose To investigate whether a non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tear (RCT) produces satisfactory clinical outcomes comparable to those of an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair. Methods A retrospective case-control study (prospectively collected data, mean follow-up: 32.7 months ± 29.5; range 12–80 months) was conducted with patients with massive RCT who underwent either an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair (group A: 34 patients) or a non-anatomic arthroscopic repair (partial repair or medialized repair, group B: 30 patients). The rate of success was calculated primarily by the number of patients per group who achieved a minimal clinically important difference between the preoperative and postoperative values of (a) the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score, (b) the constant score and (c) secondarily, the visual analogue scale (VAS-pain). Active range of motion (shoulder forward flexion, abduction, external rotation in 0° and 90° abduction), muscle strength and external rotation lag sign were also assessed. Results No significant statistical differences amongst groups were found concerning the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. All postoperative clinical and functional scores were significantly improved in both groups (p < 0.001). According to our primary and secondary success rate criteria, both treatments were found to be successful, whereas there was no significant difference amongst them. Conclusions Non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive RCT illustrated satisfactory outcomes, which are not significantly different from those reported after an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Arthroscopic complete repair</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Medialized repair</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Arthroscopic partial repair</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Massive rotator cuff tear</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Anatomic rotator cuff repair</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Non-anatomic rotator cuff repair</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Avramidis, G.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Brilakis, E.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Trellopoulos, A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Antonogiannakis, E.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">La Chirurgia degli organi di movimento</subfield><subfield code="d">Heidelberg : Springer, 2008</subfield><subfield code="g">104(2019), 2 vom: 30. Mai, Seite 187-193</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)559430167</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2412956-2</subfield><subfield code="x">1973-2538</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:104</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:30</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:187-193</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12306-019-00611-4</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">104</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">30</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">187-193</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.401 |