When do response-related episodic retrieval effects co-occur with inhibition of return?
Abstract At some point, spatial priming effects more faithfully reflect response selection processes than they do attentional orienting or sensory processes. Findings from the spatial cueing literature suggest that two factors may be critical: (1) the amount of identity processing that is required i...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Hilchey, Matthew D. [verfasserIn] Rajsic, Jason [verfasserIn] Pratt, Jay [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2020 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Perception & psychophysics - New York, NY : Springer, 1966, 82(2020), 6 vom: 27. Apr., Seite 3013-3032 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:82 ; year:2020 ; number:6 ; day:27 ; month:04 ; pages:3013-3032 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.3758/s13414-020-02020-3 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
SPR040441903 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | SPR040441903 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220111192512.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 201007s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3758/s13414-020-02020-3 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)SPR040441903 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)SPRs13414-020-02020-3-e | ||
035 | |a (SPR)s13414-020-02020-3-e | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 150 |q ASE |
084 | |a 77.40 |2 bkl | ||
084 | |a 77.05 |2 bkl | ||
084 | |a 77.50 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Hilchey, Matthew D. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a When do response-related episodic retrieval effects co-occur with inhibition of return? |
264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Abstract At some point, spatial priming effects more faithfully reflect response selection processes than they do attentional orienting or sensory processes. Findings from the spatial cueing literature suggest that two factors may be critical: (1) the amount of identity processing that is required in order to respond correctly (feature-based response hypothesis), and (2) the amount of spatial processing that is required in order to respond correctly (space-based response hypothesis). To test the first hypothesis, we manipulated whether observers made single keypress detection or two-choice localization responses to serially presented stimuli in peripheral vision and whether stimulus identity information processing was necessary before responding. Responses were always slowest when the target location repeated, consistent with an attentional orienting bias independent of keypress responding (i.e., inhibition of return; IOR). The localization procedure revealed a subtle additional cost for changing the target location and repeating a response, consistent with a response-related episodic retrieval effect predicted by the Theory of Event Coding (TEC). Neither effect was modulated by the need to discriminate features. To test the second hypothesis, we made spatial processing indispensable to response selection by requiring a decision between a detection and localization response, depending on where the target appeared. IOR was eliminated for detection, but not localization, responses, consistent with the TEC. Collectively, the findings suggest that the amount of space-based, but not feature-based, processing that is required to determine a response is responsible for the response retrieval effects that can co-occur with IOR. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Attention |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a space-based |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Inhibition of return |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Priming |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
700 | 1 | |a Rajsic, Jason |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Pratt, Jay |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Perception & psychophysics |d New York, NY : Springer, 1966 |g 82(2020), 6 vom: 27. Apr., Seite 3013-3032 |w (DE-627)32818795X |w (DE-600)2045204-4 |x 1532-5962 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:82 |g year:2020 |g number:6 |g day:27 |g month:04 |g pages:3013-3032 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02020-3 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_101 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_120 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_138 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_152 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_171 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_187 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_250 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_281 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
936 | b | k | |a 77.40 |q ASE |
936 | b | k | |a 77.05 |q ASE |
936 | b | k | |a 77.50 |q ASE |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 82 |j 2020 |e 6 |b 27 |c 04 |h 3013-3032 |
author_variant |
m d h md mdh j r jr j p jp |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:15325962:2020----::hnoepneeaeeioirtivlfetcocri |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2020 |
bklnumber |
77.40 77.05 77.50 |
publishDate |
2020 |
allfields |
10.3758/s13414-020-02020-3 doi (DE-627)SPR040441903 (DE-599)SPRs13414-020-02020-3-e (SPR)s13414-020-02020-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 150 ASE 77.40 bkl 77.05 bkl 77.50 bkl Hilchey, Matthew D. verfasserin aut When do response-related episodic retrieval effects co-occur with inhibition of return? 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract At some point, spatial priming effects more faithfully reflect response selection processes than they do attentional orienting or sensory processes. Findings from the spatial cueing literature suggest that two factors may be critical: (1) the amount of identity processing that is required in order to respond correctly (feature-based response hypothesis), and (2) the amount of spatial processing that is required in order to respond correctly (space-based response hypothesis). To test the first hypothesis, we manipulated whether observers made single keypress detection or two-choice localization responses to serially presented stimuli in peripheral vision and whether stimulus identity information processing was necessary before responding. Responses were always slowest when the target location repeated, consistent with an attentional orienting bias independent of keypress responding (i.e., inhibition of return; IOR). The localization procedure revealed a subtle additional cost for changing the target location and repeating a response, consistent with a response-related episodic retrieval effect predicted by the Theory of Event Coding (TEC). Neither effect was modulated by the need to discriminate features. To test the second hypothesis, we made spatial processing indispensable to response selection by requiring a decision between a detection and localization response, depending on where the target appeared. IOR was eliminated for detection, but not localization, responses, consistent with the TEC. Collectively, the findings suggest that the amount of space-based, but not feature-based, processing that is required to determine a response is responsible for the response retrieval effects that can co-occur with IOR. Attention (dpeaa)DE-He213 space-based (dpeaa)DE-He213 Inhibition of return (dpeaa)DE-He213 Priming (dpeaa)DE-He213 Rajsic, Jason verfasserin aut Pratt, Jay verfasserin aut Enthalten in Perception & psychophysics New York, NY : Springer, 1966 82(2020), 6 vom: 27. Apr., Seite 3013-3032 (DE-627)32818795X (DE-600)2045204-4 1532-5962 nnns volume:82 year:2020 number:6 day:27 month:04 pages:3013-3032 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02020-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2020 77.40 ASE 77.05 ASE 77.50 ASE AR 82 2020 6 27 04 3013-3032 |
spelling |
10.3758/s13414-020-02020-3 doi (DE-627)SPR040441903 (DE-599)SPRs13414-020-02020-3-e (SPR)s13414-020-02020-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 150 ASE 77.40 bkl 77.05 bkl 77.50 bkl Hilchey, Matthew D. verfasserin aut When do response-related episodic retrieval effects co-occur with inhibition of return? 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract At some point, spatial priming effects more faithfully reflect response selection processes than they do attentional orienting or sensory processes. Findings from the spatial cueing literature suggest that two factors may be critical: (1) the amount of identity processing that is required in order to respond correctly (feature-based response hypothesis), and (2) the amount of spatial processing that is required in order to respond correctly (space-based response hypothesis). To test the first hypothesis, we manipulated whether observers made single keypress detection or two-choice localization responses to serially presented stimuli in peripheral vision and whether stimulus identity information processing was necessary before responding. Responses were always slowest when the target location repeated, consistent with an attentional orienting bias independent of keypress responding (i.e., inhibition of return; IOR). The localization procedure revealed a subtle additional cost for changing the target location and repeating a response, consistent with a response-related episodic retrieval effect predicted by the Theory of Event Coding (TEC). Neither effect was modulated by the need to discriminate features. To test the second hypothesis, we made spatial processing indispensable to response selection by requiring a decision between a detection and localization response, depending on where the target appeared. IOR was eliminated for detection, but not localization, responses, consistent with the TEC. Collectively, the findings suggest that the amount of space-based, but not feature-based, processing that is required to determine a response is responsible for the response retrieval effects that can co-occur with IOR. Attention (dpeaa)DE-He213 space-based (dpeaa)DE-He213 Inhibition of return (dpeaa)DE-He213 Priming (dpeaa)DE-He213 Rajsic, Jason verfasserin aut Pratt, Jay verfasserin aut Enthalten in Perception & psychophysics New York, NY : Springer, 1966 82(2020), 6 vom: 27. Apr., Seite 3013-3032 (DE-627)32818795X (DE-600)2045204-4 1532-5962 nnns volume:82 year:2020 number:6 day:27 month:04 pages:3013-3032 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02020-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2020 77.40 ASE 77.05 ASE 77.50 ASE AR 82 2020 6 27 04 3013-3032 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.3758/s13414-020-02020-3 doi (DE-627)SPR040441903 (DE-599)SPRs13414-020-02020-3-e (SPR)s13414-020-02020-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 150 ASE 77.40 bkl 77.05 bkl 77.50 bkl Hilchey, Matthew D. verfasserin aut When do response-related episodic retrieval effects co-occur with inhibition of return? 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract At some point, spatial priming effects more faithfully reflect response selection processes than they do attentional orienting or sensory processes. Findings from the spatial cueing literature suggest that two factors may be critical: (1) the amount of identity processing that is required in order to respond correctly (feature-based response hypothesis), and (2) the amount of spatial processing that is required in order to respond correctly (space-based response hypothesis). To test the first hypothesis, we manipulated whether observers made single keypress detection or two-choice localization responses to serially presented stimuli in peripheral vision and whether stimulus identity information processing was necessary before responding. Responses were always slowest when the target location repeated, consistent with an attentional orienting bias independent of keypress responding (i.e., inhibition of return; IOR). The localization procedure revealed a subtle additional cost for changing the target location and repeating a response, consistent with a response-related episodic retrieval effect predicted by the Theory of Event Coding (TEC). Neither effect was modulated by the need to discriminate features. To test the second hypothesis, we made spatial processing indispensable to response selection by requiring a decision between a detection and localization response, depending on where the target appeared. IOR was eliminated for detection, but not localization, responses, consistent with the TEC. Collectively, the findings suggest that the amount of space-based, but not feature-based, processing that is required to determine a response is responsible for the response retrieval effects that can co-occur with IOR. Attention (dpeaa)DE-He213 space-based (dpeaa)DE-He213 Inhibition of return (dpeaa)DE-He213 Priming (dpeaa)DE-He213 Rajsic, Jason verfasserin aut Pratt, Jay verfasserin aut Enthalten in Perception & psychophysics New York, NY : Springer, 1966 82(2020), 6 vom: 27. Apr., Seite 3013-3032 (DE-627)32818795X (DE-600)2045204-4 1532-5962 nnns volume:82 year:2020 number:6 day:27 month:04 pages:3013-3032 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02020-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2020 77.40 ASE 77.05 ASE 77.50 ASE AR 82 2020 6 27 04 3013-3032 |
allfieldsGer |
10.3758/s13414-020-02020-3 doi (DE-627)SPR040441903 (DE-599)SPRs13414-020-02020-3-e (SPR)s13414-020-02020-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 150 ASE 77.40 bkl 77.05 bkl 77.50 bkl Hilchey, Matthew D. verfasserin aut When do response-related episodic retrieval effects co-occur with inhibition of return? 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract At some point, spatial priming effects more faithfully reflect response selection processes than they do attentional orienting or sensory processes. Findings from the spatial cueing literature suggest that two factors may be critical: (1) the amount of identity processing that is required in order to respond correctly (feature-based response hypothesis), and (2) the amount of spatial processing that is required in order to respond correctly (space-based response hypothesis). To test the first hypothesis, we manipulated whether observers made single keypress detection or two-choice localization responses to serially presented stimuli in peripheral vision and whether stimulus identity information processing was necessary before responding. Responses were always slowest when the target location repeated, consistent with an attentional orienting bias independent of keypress responding (i.e., inhibition of return; IOR). The localization procedure revealed a subtle additional cost for changing the target location and repeating a response, consistent with a response-related episodic retrieval effect predicted by the Theory of Event Coding (TEC). Neither effect was modulated by the need to discriminate features. To test the second hypothesis, we made spatial processing indispensable to response selection by requiring a decision between a detection and localization response, depending on where the target appeared. IOR was eliminated for detection, but not localization, responses, consistent with the TEC. Collectively, the findings suggest that the amount of space-based, but not feature-based, processing that is required to determine a response is responsible for the response retrieval effects that can co-occur with IOR. Attention (dpeaa)DE-He213 space-based (dpeaa)DE-He213 Inhibition of return (dpeaa)DE-He213 Priming (dpeaa)DE-He213 Rajsic, Jason verfasserin aut Pratt, Jay verfasserin aut Enthalten in Perception & psychophysics New York, NY : Springer, 1966 82(2020), 6 vom: 27. Apr., Seite 3013-3032 (DE-627)32818795X (DE-600)2045204-4 1532-5962 nnns volume:82 year:2020 number:6 day:27 month:04 pages:3013-3032 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02020-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2020 77.40 ASE 77.05 ASE 77.50 ASE AR 82 2020 6 27 04 3013-3032 |
allfieldsSound |
10.3758/s13414-020-02020-3 doi (DE-627)SPR040441903 (DE-599)SPRs13414-020-02020-3-e (SPR)s13414-020-02020-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 150 ASE 77.40 bkl 77.05 bkl 77.50 bkl Hilchey, Matthew D. verfasserin aut When do response-related episodic retrieval effects co-occur with inhibition of return? 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract At some point, spatial priming effects more faithfully reflect response selection processes than they do attentional orienting or sensory processes. Findings from the spatial cueing literature suggest that two factors may be critical: (1) the amount of identity processing that is required in order to respond correctly (feature-based response hypothesis), and (2) the amount of spatial processing that is required in order to respond correctly (space-based response hypothesis). To test the first hypothesis, we manipulated whether observers made single keypress detection or two-choice localization responses to serially presented stimuli in peripheral vision and whether stimulus identity information processing was necessary before responding. Responses were always slowest when the target location repeated, consistent with an attentional orienting bias independent of keypress responding (i.e., inhibition of return; IOR). The localization procedure revealed a subtle additional cost for changing the target location and repeating a response, consistent with a response-related episodic retrieval effect predicted by the Theory of Event Coding (TEC). Neither effect was modulated by the need to discriminate features. To test the second hypothesis, we made spatial processing indispensable to response selection by requiring a decision between a detection and localization response, depending on where the target appeared. IOR was eliminated for detection, but not localization, responses, consistent with the TEC. Collectively, the findings suggest that the amount of space-based, but not feature-based, processing that is required to determine a response is responsible for the response retrieval effects that can co-occur with IOR. Attention (dpeaa)DE-He213 space-based (dpeaa)DE-He213 Inhibition of return (dpeaa)DE-He213 Priming (dpeaa)DE-He213 Rajsic, Jason verfasserin aut Pratt, Jay verfasserin aut Enthalten in Perception & psychophysics New York, NY : Springer, 1966 82(2020), 6 vom: 27. Apr., Seite 3013-3032 (DE-627)32818795X (DE-600)2045204-4 1532-5962 nnns volume:82 year:2020 number:6 day:27 month:04 pages:3013-3032 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02020-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2020 77.40 ASE 77.05 ASE 77.50 ASE AR 82 2020 6 27 04 3013-3032 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Perception & psychophysics 82(2020), 6 vom: 27. Apr., Seite 3013-3032 volume:82 year:2020 number:6 day:27 month:04 pages:3013-3032 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Perception & psychophysics 82(2020), 6 vom: 27. Apr., Seite 3013-3032 volume:82 year:2020 number:6 day:27 month:04 pages:3013-3032 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Attention space-based Inhibition of return Priming |
dewey-raw |
150 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Perception & psychophysics |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Hilchey, Matthew D. @@aut@@ Rajsic, Jason @@aut@@ Pratt, Jay @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-04-27T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
32818795X |
dewey-sort |
3150 |
id |
SPR040441903 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR040441903</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220111192512.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3758/s13414-020-02020-3</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR040441903</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)SPRs13414-020-02020-3-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s13414-020-02020-3-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">150</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">77.40</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">77.05</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">77.50</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hilchey, Matthew D.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">When do response-related episodic retrieval effects co-occur with inhibition of return?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract At some point, spatial priming effects more faithfully reflect response selection processes than they do attentional orienting or sensory processes. Findings from the spatial cueing literature suggest that two factors may be critical: (1) the amount of identity processing that is required in order to respond correctly (feature-based response hypothesis), and (2) the amount of spatial processing that is required in order to respond correctly (space-based response hypothesis). To test the first hypothesis, we manipulated whether observers made single keypress detection or two-choice localization responses to serially presented stimuli in peripheral vision and whether stimulus identity information processing was necessary before responding. Responses were always slowest when the target location repeated, consistent with an attentional orienting bias independent of keypress responding (i.e., inhibition of return; IOR). The localization procedure revealed a subtle additional cost for changing the target location and repeating a response, consistent with a response-related episodic retrieval effect predicted by the Theory of Event Coding (TEC). Neither effect was modulated by the need to discriminate features. To test the second hypothesis, we made spatial processing indispensable to response selection by requiring a decision between a detection and localization response, depending on where the target appeared. IOR was eliminated for detection, but not localization, responses, consistent with the TEC. Collectively, the findings suggest that the amount of space-based, but not feature-based, processing that is required to determine a response is responsible for the response retrieval effects that can co-occur with IOR.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Attention</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">space-based</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Inhibition of return</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Priming</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rajsic, Jason</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pratt, Jay</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Perception & psychophysics</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY : Springer, 1966</subfield><subfield code="g">82(2020), 6 vom: 27. Apr., Seite 3013-3032</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)32818795X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2045204-4</subfield><subfield code="x">1532-5962</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:82</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">day:27</subfield><subfield code="g">month:04</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:3013-3032</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02020-3</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">77.40</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">77.05</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">77.50</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">82</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="b">27</subfield><subfield code="c">04</subfield><subfield code="h">3013-3032</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Hilchey, Matthew D. |
spellingShingle |
Hilchey, Matthew D. ddc 150 bkl 77.40 bkl 77.05 bkl 77.50 misc Attention misc space-based misc Inhibition of return misc Priming When do response-related episodic retrieval effects co-occur with inhibition of return? |
authorStr |
Hilchey, Matthew D. |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)32818795X |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
150 - Psychology |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut |
collection |
springer |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1532-5962 |
topic_title |
150 ASE 77.40 bkl 77.05 bkl 77.50 bkl When do response-related episodic retrieval effects co-occur with inhibition of return? Attention (dpeaa)DE-He213 space-based (dpeaa)DE-He213 Inhibition of return (dpeaa)DE-He213 Priming (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
topic |
ddc 150 bkl 77.40 bkl 77.05 bkl 77.50 misc Attention misc space-based misc Inhibition of return misc Priming |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 150 bkl 77.40 bkl 77.05 bkl 77.50 misc Attention misc space-based misc Inhibition of return misc Priming |
topic_browse |
ddc 150 bkl 77.40 bkl 77.05 bkl 77.50 misc Attention misc space-based misc Inhibition of return misc Priming |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Perception & psychophysics |
hierarchy_parent_id |
32818795X |
dewey-tens |
150 - Psychology |
hierarchy_top_title |
Perception & psychophysics |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)32818795X (DE-600)2045204-4 |
title |
When do response-related episodic retrieval effects co-occur with inhibition of return? |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR040441903 (DE-599)SPRs13414-020-02020-3-e (SPR)s13414-020-02020-3-e |
title_full |
When do response-related episodic retrieval effects co-occur with inhibition of return? |
author_sort |
Hilchey, Matthew D. |
journal |
Perception & psychophysics |
journalStr |
Perception & psychophysics |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
100 - Philosophy & psychology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2020 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
3013 |
author_browse |
Hilchey, Matthew D. Rajsic, Jason Pratt, Jay |
container_volume |
82 |
class |
150 ASE 77.40 bkl 77.05 bkl 77.50 bkl |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Hilchey, Matthew D. |
doi_str_mv |
10.3758/s13414-020-02020-3 |
dewey-full |
150 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
when do response-related episodic retrieval effects co-occur with inhibition of return? |
title_auth |
When do response-related episodic retrieval effects co-occur with inhibition of return? |
abstract |
Abstract At some point, spatial priming effects more faithfully reflect response selection processes than they do attentional orienting or sensory processes. Findings from the spatial cueing literature suggest that two factors may be critical: (1) the amount of identity processing that is required in order to respond correctly (feature-based response hypothesis), and (2) the amount of spatial processing that is required in order to respond correctly (space-based response hypothesis). To test the first hypothesis, we manipulated whether observers made single keypress detection or two-choice localization responses to serially presented stimuli in peripheral vision and whether stimulus identity information processing was necessary before responding. Responses were always slowest when the target location repeated, consistent with an attentional orienting bias independent of keypress responding (i.e., inhibition of return; IOR). The localization procedure revealed a subtle additional cost for changing the target location and repeating a response, consistent with a response-related episodic retrieval effect predicted by the Theory of Event Coding (TEC). Neither effect was modulated by the need to discriminate features. To test the second hypothesis, we made spatial processing indispensable to response selection by requiring a decision between a detection and localization response, depending on where the target appeared. IOR was eliminated for detection, but not localization, responses, consistent with the TEC. Collectively, the findings suggest that the amount of space-based, but not feature-based, processing that is required to determine a response is responsible for the response retrieval effects that can co-occur with IOR. |
abstractGer |
Abstract At some point, spatial priming effects more faithfully reflect response selection processes than they do attentional orienting or sensory processes. Findings from the spatial cueing literature suggest that two factors may be critical: (1) the amount of identity processing that is required in order to respond correctly (feature-based response hypothesis), and (2) the amount of spatial processing that is required in order to respond correctly (space-based response hypothesis). To test the first hypothesis, we manipulated whether observers made single keypress detection or two-choice localization responses to serially presented stimuli in peripheral vision and whether stimulus identity information processing was necessary before responding. Responses were always slowest when the target location repeated, consistent with an attentional orienting bias independent of keypress responding (i.e., inhibition of return; IOR). The localization procedure revealed a subtle additional cost for changing the target location and repeating a response, consistent with a response-related episodic retrieval effect predicted by the Theory of Event Coding (TEC). Neither effect was modulated by the need to discriminate features. To test the second hypothesis, we made spatial processing indispensable to response selection by requiring a decision between a detection and localization response, depending on where the target appeared. IOR was eliminated for detection, but not localization, responses, consistent with the TEC. Collectively, the findings suggest that the amount of space-based, but not feature-based, processing that is required to determine a response is responsible for the response retrieval effects that can co-occur with IOR. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract At some point, spatial priming effects more faithfully reflect response selection processes than they do attentional orienting or sensory processes. Findings from the spatial cueing literature suggest that two factors may be critical: (1) the amount of identity processing that is required in order to respond correctly (feature-based response hypothesis), and (2) the amount of spatial processing that is required in order to respond correctly (space-based response hypothesis). To test the first hypothesis, we manipulated whether observers made single keypress detection or two-choice localization responses to serially presented stimuli in peripheral vision and whether stimulus identity information processing was necessary before responding. Responses were always slowest when the target location repeated, consistent with an attentional orienting bias independent of keypress responding (i.e., inhibition of return; IOR). The localization procedure revealed a subtle additional cost for changing the target location and repeating a response, consistent with a response-related episodic retrieval effect predicted by the Theory of Event Coding (TEC). Neither effect was modulated by the need to discriminate features. To test the second hypothesis, we made spatial processing indispensable to response selection by requiring a decision between a detection and localization response, depending on where the target appeared. IOR was eliminated for detection, but not localization, responses, consistent with the TEC. Collectively, the findings suggest that the amount of space-based, but not feature-based, processing that is required to determine a response is responsible for the response retrieval effects that can co-occur with IOR. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2020 |
container_issue |
6 |
title_short |
When do response-related episodic retrieval effects co-occur with inhibition of return? |
url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02020-3 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Rajsic, Jason Pratt, Jay |
author2Str |
Rajsic, Jason Pratt, Jay |
ppnlink |
32818795X |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.3758/s13414-020-02020-3 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T16:01:53.674Z |
_version_ |
1803574327296131072 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR040441903</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220111192512.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3758/s13414-020-02020-3</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR040441903</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)SPRs13414-020-02020-3-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s13414-020-02020-3-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">150</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">77.40</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">77.05</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">77.50</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hilchey, Matthew D.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">When do response-related episodic retrieval effects co-occur with inhibition of return?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract At some point, spatial priming effects more faithfully reflect response selection processes than they do attentional orienting or sensory processes. Findings from the spatial cueing literature suggest that two factors may be critical: (1) the amount of identity processing that is required in order to respond correctly (feature-based response hypothesis), and (2) the amount of spatial processing that is required in order to respond correctly (space-based response hypothesis). To test the first hypothesis, we manipulated whether observers made single keypress detection or two-choice localization responses to serially presented stimuli in peripheral vision and whether stimulus identity information processing was necessary before responding. Responses were always slowest when the target location repeated, consistent with an attentional orienting bias independent of keypress responding (i.e., inhibition of return; IOR). The localization procedure revealed a subtle additional cost for changing the target location and repeating a response, consistent with a response-related episodic retrieval effect predicted by the Theory of Event Coding (TEC). Neither effect was modulated by the need to discriminate features. To test the second hypothesis, we made spatial processing indispensable to response selection by requiring a decision between a detection and localization response, depending on where the target appeared. IOR was eliminated for detection, but not localization, responses, consistent with the TEC. Collectively, the findings suggest that the amount of space-based, but not feature-based, processing that is required to determine a response is responsible for the response retrieval effects that can co-occur with IOR.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Attention</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">space-based</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Inhibition of return</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Priming</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rajsic, Jason</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pratt, Jay</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Perception & psychophysics</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY : Springer, 1966</subfield><subfield code="g">82(2020), 6 vom: 27. Apr., Seite 3013-3032</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)32818795X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2045204-4</subfield><subfield code="x">1532-5962</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:82</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">day:27</subfield><subfield code="g">month:04</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:3013-3032</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02020-3</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">77.40</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">77.05</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">77.50</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">82</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="b">27</subfield><subfield code="c">04</subfield><subfield code="h">3013-3032</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3988714 |