An application of psychosocial frameworks for eating disorder risk during the postpartum period: A review and future directions
Abstract The postpartum period may be a particular window of vulnerability for eating disorder symptoms given changes to body shape and weight that women experience. However, no quantitative studies have identified risk factors for postpartum eating disorder symptoms, and current psychosocial framew...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Thompson, Katherine [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Archives of Women's Mental Health - Springer-Verlag, 2002, 23(2020), 5 vom: 01. Juli, Seite 625-633 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:23 ; year:2020 ; number:5 ; day:01 ; month:07 ; pages:625-633 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s00737-020-01049-5 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR040944751 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR040944751 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20201126031852.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201007s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00737-020-01049-5 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR040944751 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)s00737-020-01049-5-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Thompson, Katherine |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 3 | |a An application of psychosocial frameworks for eating disorder risk during the postpartum period: A review and future directions |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract The postpartum period may be a particular window of vulnerability for eating disorder symptoms given changes to body shape and weight that women experience. However, no quantitative studies have identified risk factors for postpartum eating disorder symptoms, and current psychosocial frameworks of risk may be missing key elements unique to this period. This manuscript reviews existing quantitative and qualitative literature regarding the developmental trajectory of eating disorder symptoms during the perinatal period and proposes an application of three psychosocial models of eating disorder risk (objectification theory, the tripartite influence model of body image and eating disturbances, and social comparison theory) to the postpartum period. Drawing on quantitative and qualitative literature, this paper identifies novel postpartum-specific factors that should be included for consideration in psychosocial models (e.g., self-oriented body comparison and pressure to achieve a prepregnancy weight and shape). This review is the first to theorize potential postpartum-specific risk factors for postpartum eating disorder symptoms. Prior models of eating disorder risk omit key psychosocial factors that are unique to the postpartum period. Other limitations of prior research relate to measurement and methodology. This critical window of vulnerability has been largely ignored in the quantitative literature and necessitates further research. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Psychosocial framework; Objectification theory |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Tripartite model |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Social comparison theory |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Eating disorders; Postpartum |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Archives of Women's Mental Health |d Springer-Verlag, 2002 |g 23(2020), 5 vom: 01. Juli, Seite 625-633 |w (DE-627)SPR007667299 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:23 |g year:2020 |g number:5 |g day:01 |g month:07 |g pages:625-633 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00737-020-01049-5 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 23 |j 2020 |e 5 |b 01 |c 07 |h 625-633 | ||
| author_variant |
k t kt |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
thompsonkatherine:2020----:nplctoopyhscafaeokfraigiodrikuighpsprupr |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2020 |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s00737-020-01049-5 doi (DE-627)SPR040944751 (SPR)s00737-020-01049-5-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Thompson, Katherine verfasserin aut An application of psychosocial frameworks for eating disorder risk during the postpartum period: A review and future directions 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract The postpartum period may be a particular window of vulnerability for eating disorder symptoms given changes to body shape and weight that women experience. However, no quantitative studies have identified risk factors for postpartum eating disorder symptoms, and current psychosocial frameworks of risk may be missing key elements unique to this period. This manuscript reviews existing quantitative and qualitative literature regarding the developmental trajectory of eating disorder symptoms during the perinatal period and proposes an application of three psychosocial models of eating disorder risk (objectification theory, the tripartite influence model of body image and eating disturbances, and social comparison theory) to the postpartum period. Drawing on quantitative and qualitative literature, this paper identifies novel postpartum-specific factors that should be included for consideration in psychosocial models (e.g., self-oriented body comparison and pressure to achieve a prepregnancy weight and shape). This review is the first to theorize potential postpartum-specific risk factors for postpartum eating disorder symptoms. Prior models of eating disorder risk omit key psychosocial factors that are unique to the postpartum period. Other limitations of prior research relate to measurement and methodology. This critical window of vulnerability has been largely ignored in the quantitative literature and necessitates further research. Psychosocial framework; Objectification theory (dpeaa)DE-He213 Tripartite model (dpeaa)DE-He213 Social comparison theory (dpeaa)DE-He213 Eating disorders; Postpartum (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enthalten in Archives of Women's Mental Health Springer-Verlag, 2002 23(2020), 5 vom: 01. Juli, Seite 625-633 (DE-627)SPR007667299 nnns volume:23 year:2020 number:5 day:01 month:07 pages:625-633 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00737-020-01049-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 23 2020 5 01 07 625-633 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s00737-020-01049-5 doi (DE-627)SPR040944751 (SPR)s00737-020-01049-5-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Thompson, Katherine verfasserin aut An application of psychosocial frameworks for eating disorder risk during the postpartum period: A review and future directions 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract The postpartum period may be a particular window of vulnerability for eating disorder symptoms given changes to body shape and weight that women experience. However, no quantitative studies have identified risk factors for postpartum eating disorder symptoms, and current psychosocial frameworks of risk may be missing key elements unique to this period. This manuscript reviews existing quantitative and qualitative literature regarding the developmental trajectory of eating disorder symptoms during the perinatal period and proposes an application of three psychosocial models of eating disorder risk (objectification theory, the tripartite influence model of body image and eating disturbances, and social comparison theory) to the postpartum period. Drawing on quantitative and qualitative literature, this paper identifies novel postpartum-specific factors that should be included for consideration in psychosocial models (e.g., self-oriented body comparison and pressure to achieve a prepregnancy weight and shape). This review is the first to theorize potential postpartum-specific risk factors for postpartum eating disorder symptoms. Prior models of eating disorder risk omit key psychosocial factors that are unique to the postpartum period. Other limitations of prior research relate to measurement and methodology. This critical window of vulnerability has been largely ignored in the quantitative literature and necessitates further research. Psychosocial framework; Objectification theory (dpeaa)DE-He213 Tripartite model (dpeaa)DE-He213 Social comparison theory (dpeaa)DE-He213 Eating disorders; Postpartum (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enthalten in Archives of Women's Mental Health Springer-Verlag, 2002 23(2020), 5 vom: 01. Juli, Seite 625-633 (DE-627)SPR007667299 nnns volume:23 year:2020 number:5 day:01 month:07 pages:625-633 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00737-020-01049-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 23 2020 5 01 07 625-633 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s00737-020-01049-5 doi (DE-627)SPR040944751 (SPR)s00737-020-01049-5-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Thompson, Katherine verfasserin aut An application of psychosocial frameworks for eating disorder risk during the postpartum period: A review and future directions 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract The postpartum period may be a particular window of vulnerability for eating disorder symptoms given changes to body shape and weight that women experience. However, no quantitative studies have identified risk factors for postpartum eating disorder symptoms, and current psychosocial frameworks of risk may be missing key elements unique to this period. This manuscript reviews existing quantitative and qualitative literature regarding the developmental trajectory of eating disorder symptoms during the perinatal period and proposes an application of three psychosocial models of eating disorder risk (objectification theory, the tripartite influence model of body image and eating disturbances, and social comparison theory) to the postpartum period. Drawing on quantitative and qualitative literature, this paper identifies novel postpartum-specific factors that should be included for consideration in psychosocial models (e.g., self-oriented body comparison and pressure to achieve a prepregnancy weight and shape). This review is the first to theorize potential postpartum-specific risk factors for postpartum eating disorder symptoms. Prior models of eating disorder risk omit key psychosocial factors that are unique to the postpartum period. Other limitations of prior research relate to measurement and methodology. This critical window of vulnerability has been largely ignored in the quantitative literature and necessitates further research. Psychosocial framework; Objectification theory (dpeaa)DE-He213 Tripartite model (dpeaa)DE-He213 Social comparison theory (dpeaa)DE-He213 Eating disorders; Postpartum (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enthalten in Archives of Women's Mental Health Springer-Verlag, 2002 23(2020), 5 vom: 01. Juli, Seite 625-633 (DE-627)SPR007667299 nnns volume:23 year:2020 number:5 day:01 month:07 pages:625-633 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00737-020-01049-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 23 2020 5 01 07 625-633 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s00737-020-01049-5 doi (DE-627)SPR040944751 (SPR)s00737-020-01049-5-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Thompson, Katherine verfasserin aut An application of psychosocial frameworks for eating disorder risk during the postpartum period: A review and future directions 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract The postpartum period may be a particular window of vulnerability for eating disorder symptoms given changes to body shape and weight that women experience. However, no quantitative studies have identified risk factors for postpartum eating disorder symptoms, and current psychosocial frameworks of risk may be missing key elements unique to this period. This manuscript reviews existing quantitative and qualitative literature regarding the developmental trajectory of eating disorder symptoms during the perinatal period and proposes an application of three psychosocial models of eating disorder risk (objectification theory, the tripartite influence model of body image and eating disturbances, and social comparison theory) to the postpartum period. Drawing on quantitative and qualitative literature, this paper identifies novel postpartum-specific factors that should be included for consideration in psychosocial models (e.g., self-oriented body comparison and pressure to achieve a prepregnancy weight and shape). This review is the first to theorize potential postpartum-specific risk factors for postpartum eating disorder symptoms. Prior models of eating disorder risk omit key psychosocial factors that are unique to the postpartum period. Other limitations of prior research relate to measurement and methodology. This critical window of vulnerability has been largely ignored in the quantitative literature and necessitates further research. Psychosocial framework; Objectification theory (dpeaa)DE-He213 Tripartite model (dpeaa)DE-He213 Social comparison theory (dpeaa)DE-He213 Eating disorders; Postpartum (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enthalten in Archives of Women's Mental Health Springer-Verlag, 2002 23(2020), 5 vom: 01. Juli, Seite 625-633 (DE-627)SPR007667299 nnns volume:23 year:2020 number:5 day:01 month:07 pages:625-633 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00737-020-01049-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 23 2020 5 01 07 625-633 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s00737-020-01049-5 doi (DE-627)SPR040944751 (SPR)s00737-020-01049-5-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Thompson, Katherine verfasserin aut An application of psychosocial frameworks for eating disorder risk during the postpartum period: A review and future directions 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract The postpartum period may be a particular window of vulnerability for eating disorder symptoms given changes to body shape and weight that women experience. However, no quantitative studies have identified risk factors for postpartum eating disorder symptoms, and current psychosocial frameworks of risk may be missing key elements unique to this period. This manuscript reviews existing quantitative and qualitative literature regarding the developmental trajectory of eating disorder symptoms during the perinatal period and proposes an application of three psychosocial models of eating disorder risk (objectification theory, the tripartite influence model of body image and eating disturbances, and social comparison theory) to the postpartum period. Drawing on quantitative and qualitative literature, this paper identifies novel postpartum-specific factors that should be included for consideration in psychosocial models (e.g., self-oriented body comparison and pressure to achieve a prepregnancy weight and shape). This review is the first to theorize potential postpartum-specific risk factors for postpartum eating disorder symptoms. Prior models of eating disorder risk omit key psychosocial factors that are unique to the postpartum period. Other limitations of prior research relate to measurement and methodology. This critical window of vulnerability has been largely ignored in the quantitative literature and necessitates further research. Psychosocial framework; Objectification theory (dpeaa)DE-He213 Tripartite model (dpeaa)DE-He213 Social comparison theory (dpeaa)DE-He213 Eating disorders; Postpartum (dpeaa)DE-He213 Enthalten in Archives of Women's Mental Health Springer-Verlag, 2002 23(2020), 5 vom: 01. Juli, Seite 625-633 (DE-627)SPR007667299 nnns volume:23 year:2020 number:5 day:01 month:07 pages:625-633 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00737-020-01049-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 23 2020 5 01 07 625-633 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Archives of Women's Mental Health 23(2020), 5 vom: 01. Juli, Seite 625-633 volume:23 year:2020 number:5 day:01 month:07 pages:625-633 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Archives of Women's Mental Health 23(2020), 5 vom: 01. Juli, Seite 625-633 volume:23 year:2020 number:5 day:01 month:07 pages:625-633 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Psychosocial framework; Objectification theory Tripartite model Social comparison theory Eating disorders; Postpartum |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Archives of Women's Mental Health |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Thompson, Katherine @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-07-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
SPR007667299 |
| id |
SPR040944751 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR040944751</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20201126031852.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00737-020-01049-5</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR040944751</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s00737-020-01049-5-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Thompson, Katherine</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">An application of psychosocial frameworks for eating disorder risk during the postpartum period: A review and future directions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The postpartum period may be a particular window of vulnerability for eating disorder symptoms given changes to body shape and weight that women experience. However, no quantitative studies have identified risk factors for postpartum eating disorder symptoms, and current psychosocial frameworks of risk may be missing key elements unique to this period. This manuscript reviews existing quantitative and qualitative literature regarding the developmental trajectory of eating disorder symptoms during the perinatal period and proposes an application of three psychosocial models of eating disorder risk (objectification theory, the tripartite influence model of body image and eating disturbances, and social comparison theory) to the postpartum period. Drawing on quantitative and qualitative literature, this paper identifies novel postpartum-specific factors that should be included for consideration in psychosocial models (e.g., self-oriented body comparison and pressure to achieve a prepregnancy weight and shape). This review is the first to theorize potential postpartum-specific risk factors for postpartum eating disorder symptoms. Prior models of eating disorder risk omit key psychosocial factors that are unique to the postpartum period. Other limitations of prior research relate to measurement and methodology. This critical window of vulnerability has been largely ignored in the quantitative literature and necessitates further research.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Psychosocial framework; Objectification theory</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Tripartite model</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social comparison theory</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Eating disorders; Postpartum</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Archives of Women's Mental Health</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 2002</subfield><subfield code="g">23(2020), 5 vom: 01. Juli, Seite 625-633</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR007667299</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:23</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">day:01</subfield><subfield code="g">month:07</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:625-633</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00737-020-01049-5</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">23</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="b">01</subfield><subfield code="c">07</subfield><subfield code="h">625-633</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Thompson, Katherine |
| spellingShingle |
Thompson, Katherine misc Psychosocial framework; Objectification theory misc Tripartite model misc Social comparison theory misc Eating disorders; Postpartum An application of psychosocial frameworks for eating disorder risk during the postpartum period: A review and future directions |
| authorStr |
Thompson, Katherine |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)SPR007667299 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
An application of psychosocial frameworks for eating disorder risk during the postpartum period: A review and future directions Psychosocial framework; Objectification theory (dpeaa)DE-He213 Tripartite model (dpeaa)DE-He213 Social comparison theory (dpeaa)DE-He213 Eating disorders; Postpartum (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
misc Psychosocial framework; Objectification theory misc Tripartite model misc Social comparison theory misc Eating disorders; Postpartum |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Psychosocial framework; Objectification theory misc Tripartite model misc Social comparison theory misc Eating disorders; Postpartum |
| topic_browse |
misc Psychosocial framework; Objectification theory misc Tripartite model misc Social comparison theory misc Eating disorders; Postpartum |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Archives of Women's Mental Health |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
SPR007667299 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Archives of Women's Mental Health |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)SPR007667299 |
| title |
An application of psychosocial frameworks for eating disorder risk during the postpartum period: A review and future directions |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR040944751 (SPR)s00737-020-01049-5-e |
| title_full |
An application of psychosocial frameworks for eating disorder risk during the postpartum period: A review and future directions |
| author_sort |
Thompson, Katherine |
| journal |
Archives of Women's Mental Health |
| journalStr |
Archives of Women's Mental Health |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
625 |
| author_browse |
Thompson, Katherine |
| container_volume |
23 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Thompson, Katherine |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s00737-020-01049-5 |
| title_sort |
application of psychosocial frameworks for eating disorder risk during the postpartum period: a review and future directions |
| title_auth |
An application of psychosocial frameworks for eating disorder risk during the postpartum period: A review and future directions |
| abstract |
Abstract The postpartum period may be a particular window of vulnerability for eating disorder symptoms given changes to body shape and weight that women experience. However, no quantitative studies have identified risk factors for postpartum eating disorder symptoms, and current psychosocial frameworks of risk may be missing key elements unique to this period. This manuscript reviews existing quantitative and qualitative literature regarding the developmental trajectory of eating disorder symptoms during the perinatal period and proposes an application of three psychosocial models of eating disorder risk (objectification theory, the tripartite influence model of body image and eating disturbances, and social comparison theory) to the postpartum period. Drawing on quantitative and qualitative literature, this paper identifies novel postpartum-specific factors that should be included for consideration in psychosocial models (e.g., self-oriented body comparison and pressure to achieve a prepregnancy weight and shape). This review is the first to theorize potential postpartum-specific risk factors for postpartum eating disorder symptoms. Prior models of eating disorder risk omit key psychosocial factors that are unique to the postpartum period. Other limitations of prior research relate to measurement and methodology. This critical window of vulnerability has been largely ignored in the quantitative literature and necessitates further research. |
| abstractGer |
Abstract The postpartum period may be a particular window of vulnerability for eating disorder symptoms given changes to body shape and weight that women experience. However, no quantitative studies have identified risk factors for postpartum eating disorder symptoms, and current psychosocial frameworks of risk may be missing key elements unique to this period. This manuscript reviews existing quantitative and qualitative literature regarding the developmental trajectory of eating disorder symptoms during the perinatal period and proposes an application of three psychosocial models of eating disorder risk (objectification theory, the tripartite influence model of body image and eating disturbances, and social comparison theory) to the postpartum period. Drawing on quantitative and qualitative literature, this paper identifies novel postpartum-specific factors that should be included for consideration in psychosocial models (e.g., self-oriented body comparison and pressure to achieve a prepregnancy weight and shape). This review is the first to theorize potential postpartum-specific risk factors for postpartum eating disorder symptoms. Prior models of eating disorder risk omit key psychosocial factors that are unique to the postpartum period. Other limitations of prior research relate to measurement and methodology. This critical window of vulnerability has been largely ignored in the quantitative literature and necessitates further research. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract The postpartum period may be a particular window of vulnerability for eating disorder symptoms given changes to body shape and weight that women experience. However, no quantitative studies have identified risk factors for postpartum eating disorder symptoms, and current psychosocial frameworks of risk may be missing key elements unique to this period. This manuscript reviews existing quantitative and qualitative literature regarding the developmental trajectory of eating disorder symptoms during the perinatal period and proposes an application of three psychosocial models of eating disorder risk (objectification theory, the tripartite influence model of body image and eating disturbances, and social comparison theory) to the postpartum period. Drawing on quantitative and qualitative literature, this paper identifies novel postpartum-specific factors that should be included for consideration in psychosocial models (e.g., self-oriented body comparison and pressure to achieve a prepregnancy weight and shape). This review is the first to theorize potential postpartum-specific risk factors for postpartum eating disorder symptoms. Prior models of eating disorder risk omit key psychosocial factors that are unique to the postpartum period. Other limitations of prior research relate to measurement and methodology. This critical window of vulnerability has been largely ignored in the quantitative literature and necessitates further research. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER |
| container_issue |
5 |
| title_short |
An application of psychosocial frameworks for eating disorder risk during the postpartum period: A review and future directions |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00737-020-01049-5 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
SPR007667299 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s00737-020-01049-5 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T19:15:49.933Z |
| _version_ |
1803586528801193984 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR040944751</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20201126031852.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">201007s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00737-020-01049-5</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR040944751</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s00737-020-01049-5-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Thompson, Katherine</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">An application of psychosocial frameworks for eating disorder risk during the postpartum period: A review and future directions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The postpartum period may be a particular window of vulnerability for eating disorder symptoms given changes to body shape and weight that women experience. However, no quantitative studies have identified risk factors for postpartum eating disorder symptoms, and current psychosocial frameworks of risk may be missing key elements unique to this period. This manuscript reviews existing quantitative and qualitative literature regarding the developmental trajectory of eating disorder symptoms during the perinatal period and proposes an application of three psychosocial models of eating disorder risk (objectification theory, the tripartite influence model of body image and eating disturbances, and social comparison theory) to the postpartum period. Drawing on quantitative and qualitative literature, this paper identifies novel postpartum-specific factors that should be included for consideration in psychosocial models (e.g., self-oriented body comparison and pressure to achieve a prepregnancy weight and shape). This review is the first to theorize potential postpartum-specific risk factors for postpartum eating disorder symptoms. Prior models of eating disorder risk omit key psychosocial factors that are unique to the postpartum period. Other limitations of prior research relate to measurement and methodology. This critical window of vulnerability has been largely ignored in the quantitative literature and necessitates further research.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Psychosocial framework; Objectification theory</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Tripartite model</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social comparison theory</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Eating disorders; Postpartum</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Archives of Women's Mental Health</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 2002</subfield><subfield code="g">23(2020), 5 vom: 01. Juli, Seite 625-633</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR007667299</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:23</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">day:01</subfield><subfield code="g">month:07</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:625-633</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00737-020-01049-5</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">23</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="b">01</subfield><subfield code="c">07</subfield><subfield code="h">625-633</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.401513 |