Synchronization of surface acoustic wave (SAW)-based delay-coupled self-oscillating MEMS
Abstract Coupled limit cycle oscillators have potential usage in neurocomputing, pattern recognition, signal processing units such as multilayer perceptrons and stable timekeeping devices. Here, we study the synchronization dynamics of parametrically excited coupled dome-shaped MEMS (microelectromec...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Govind, M. [verfasserIn] Pandey, M. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: International Journal of Advances in Engineering Sciences and Applied Mathematics - Springer-Verlag, 2009, 12(2020), 3-4 vom: Dez., Seite 218-232 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:12 ; year:2020 ; number:3-4 ; month:12 ; pages:218-232 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s12572-020-00277-3 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR043186831 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR043186831 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210216064855.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210216s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s12572-020-00277-3 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR043186831 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)SPRs12572-020-00277-3-e | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)s12572-020-00277-3-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Govind, M. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Synchronization of surface acoustic wave (SAW)-based delay-coupled self-oscillating MEMS |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Coupled limit cycle oscillators have potential usage in neurocomputing, pattern recognition, signal processing units such as multilayer perceptrons and stable timekeeping devices. Here, we study the synchronization dynamics of parametrically excited coupled dome-shaped MEMS (microelectromechanical system), exhibiting limit cycle oscillations and hysteresis, which have previously been shown to synchronize with an external reference signal [1, 2]. The coupling considered here is through surface acoustic wave (SAW), emanating in the substrate near each oscillator, due to periodic forcing of the same, which acts as a base vibration term for the forced oscillator. Dynamics of the individual MEMS can be adequately modeled as Mathieu–van der Pol–Duffing (MVDPD) oscillator [3], while the effect of SAW can be added as a delay coupling term, because of finite time involved in travel of this signal, resulting in a set of delay differential equations (DDEs). Various solutions for different parameter values are identified and the synchronization regions mapped under the case of a general dissipative type coupling. Numerical integration of the DDE for the system as well as the ODE obtained by applying the Krylov–Bogoliubov averaging method to the same is used for detailed analysis. The averaged equations are further reduced to get a phase equation which can be used to map the regions of synchronization at a much smaller computational budget. It is found that in general the delay terms lead to an increase in the synchronization region, while a cubic coupling term would be more effective. Effect of different parameters of individual oscillator on synchronization is also studied, which provide guidance for fabrication and testing of the optimized system. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Synchronization |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a MEMS |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Nonlinear dynamics |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Delay |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pandey, M. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International Journal of Advances in Engineering Sciences and Applied Mathematics |d Springer-Verlag, 2009 |g 12(2020), 3-4 vom: Dez., Seite 218-232 |w (DE-627)SPR026154293 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:12 |g year:2020 |g number:3-4 |g month:12 |g pages:218-232 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12572-020-00277-3 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 12 |j 2020 |e 3-4 |c 12 |h 218-232 | ||
| author_variant |
m g mg m p mp |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
govindmpandeym:2020----:ycrnztoosraecutcaeabsdeacul |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2020 |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s12572-020-00277-3 doi (DE-627)SPR043186831 (DE-599)SPRs12572-020-00277-3-e (SPR)s12572-020-00277-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Govind, M. verfasserin aut Synchronization of surface acoustic wave (SAW)-based delay-coupled self-oscillating MEMS 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Coupled limit cycle oscillators have potential usage in neurocomputing, pattern recognition, signal processing units such as multilayer perceptrons and stable timekeeping devices. Here, we study the synchronization dynamics of parametrically excited coupled dome-shaped MEMS (microelectromechanical system), exhibiting limit cycle oscillations and hysteresis, which have previously been shown to synchronize with an external reference signal [1, 2]. The coupling considered here is through surface acoustic wave (SAW), emanating in the substrate near each oscillator, due to periodic forcing of the same, which acts as a base vibration term for the forced oscillator. Dynamics of the individual MEMS can be adequately modeled as Mathieu–van der Pol–Duffing (MVDPD) oscillator [3], while the effect of SAW can be added as a delay coupling term, because of finite time involved in travel of this signal, resulting in a set of delay differential equations (DDEs). Various solutions for different parameter values are identified and the synchronization regions mapped under the case of a general dissipative type coupling. Numerical integration of the DDE for the system as well as the ODE obtained by applying the Krylov–Bogoliubov averaging method to the same is used for detailed analysis. The averaged equations are further reduced to get a phase equation which can be used to map the regions of synchronization at a much smaller computational budget. It is found that in general the delay terms lead to an increase in the synchronization region, while a cubic coupling term would be more effective. Effect of different parameters of individual oscillator on synchronization is also studied, which provide guidance for fabrication and testing of the optimized system. Synchronization (dpeaa)DE-He213 MEMS (dpeaa)DE-He213 Nonlinear dynamics (dpeaa)DE-He213 Delay (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pandey, M. verfasserin aut Enthalten in International Journal of Advances in Engineering Sciences and Applied Mathematics Springer-Verlag, 2009 12(2020), 3-4 vom: Dez., Seite 218-232 (DE-627)SPR026154293 nnns volume:12 year:2020 number:3-4 month:12 pages:218-232 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12572-020-00277-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 12 2020 3-4 12 218-232 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s12572-020-00277-3 doi (DE-627)SPR043186831 (DE-599)SPRs12572-020-00277-3-e (SPR)s12572-020-00277-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Govind, M. verfasserin aut Synchronization of surface acoustic wave (SAW)-based delay-coupled self-oscillating MEMS 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Coupled limit cycle oscillators have potential usage in neurocomputing, pattern recognition, signal processing units such as multilayer perceptrons and stable timekeeping devices. Here, we study the synchronization dynamics of parametrically excited coupled dome-shaped MEMS (microelectromechanical system), exhibiting limit cycle oscillations and hysteresis, which have previously been shown to synchronize with an external reference signal [1, 2]. The coupling considered here is through surface acoustic wave (SAW), emanating in the substrate near each oscillator, due to periodic forcing of the same, which acts as a base vibration term for the forced oscillator. Dynamics of the individual MEMS can be adequately modeled as Mathieu–van der Pol–Duffing (MVDPD) oscillator [3], while the effect of SAW can be added as a delay coupling term, because of finite time involved in travel of this signal, resulting in a set of delay differential equations (DDEs). Various solutions for different parameter values are identified and the synchronization regions mapped under the case of a general dissipative type coupling. Numerical integration of the DDE for the system as well as the ODE obtained by applying the Krylov–Bogoliubov averaging method to the same is used for detailed analysis. The averaged equations are further reduced to get a phase equation which can be used to map the regions of synchronization at a much smaller computational budget. It is found that in general the delay terms lead to an increase in the synchronization region, while a cubic coupling term would be more effective. Effect of different parameters of individual oscillator on synchronization is also studied, which provide guidance for fabrication and testing of the optimized system. Synchronization (dpeaa)DE-He213 MEMS (dpeaa)DE-He213 Nonlinear dynamics (dpeaa)DE-He213 Delay (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pandey, M. verfasserin aut Enthalten in International Journal of Advances in Engineering Sciences and Applied Mathematics Springer-Verlag, 2009 12(2020), 3-4 vom: Dez., Seite 218-232 (DE-627)SPR026154293 nnns volume:12 year:2020 number:3-4 month:12 pages:218-232 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12572-020-00277-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 12 2020 3-4 12 218-232 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s12572-020-00277-3 doi (DE-627)SPR043186831 (DE-599)SPRs12572-020-00277-3-e (SPR)s12572-020-00277-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Govind, M. verfasserin aut Synchronization of surface acoustic wave (SAW)-based delay-coupled self-oscillating MEMS 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Coupled limit cycle oscillators have potential usage in neurocomputing, pattern recognition, signal processing units such as multilayer perceptrons and stable timekeeping devices. Here, we study the synchronization dynamics of parametrically excited coupled dome-shaped MEMS (microelectromechanical system), exhibiting limit cycle oscillations and hysteresis, which have previously been shown to synchronize with an external reference signal [1, 2]. The coupling considered here is through surface acoustic wave (SAW), emanating in the substrate near each oscillator, due to periodic forcing of the same, which acts as a base vibration term for the forced oscillator. Dynamics of the individual MEMS can be adequately modeled as Mathieu–van der Pol–Duffing (MVDPD) oscillator [3], while the effect of SAW can be added as a delay coupling term, because of finite time involved in travel of this signal, resulting in a set of delay differential equations (DDEs). Various solutions for different parameter values are identified and the synchronization regions mapped under the case of a general dissipative type coupling. Numerical integration of the DDE for the system as well as the ODE obtained by applying the Krylov–Bogoliubov averaging method to the same is used for detailed analysis. The averaged equations are further reduced to get a phase equation which can be used to map the regions of synchronization at a much smaller computational budget. It is found that in general the delay terms lead to an increase in the synchronization region, while a cubic coupling term would be more effective. Effect of different parameters of individual oscillator on synchronization is also studied, which provide guidance for fabrication and testing of the optimized system. Synchronization (dpeaa)DE-He213 MEMS (dpeaa)DE-He213 Nonlinear dynamics (dpeaa)DE-He213 Delay (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pandey, M. verfasserin aut Enthalten in International Journal of Advances in Engineering Sciences and Applied Mathematics Springer-Verlag, 2009 12(2020), 3-4 vom: Dez., Seite 218-232 (DE-627)SPR026154293 nnns volume:12 year:2020 number:3-4 month:12 pages:218-232 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12572-020-00277-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 12 2020 3-4 12 218-232 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s12572-020-00277-3 doi (DE-627)SPR043186831 (DE-599)SPRs12572-020-00277-3-e (SPR)s12572-020-00277-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Govind, M. verfasserin aut Synchronization of surface acoustic wave (SAW)-based delay-coupled self-oscillating MEMS 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Coupled limit cycle oscillators have potential usage in neurocomputing, pattern recognition, signal processing units such as multilayer perceptrons and stable timekeeping devices. Here, we study the synchronization dynamics of parametrically excited coupled dome-shaped MEMS (microelectromechanical system), exhibiting limit cycle oscillations and hysteresis, which have previously been shown to synchronize with an external reference signal [1, 2]. The coupling considered here is through surface acoustic wave (SAW), emanating in the substrate near each oscillator, due to periodic forcing of the same, which acts as a base vibration term for the forced oscillator. Dynamics of the individual MEMS can be adequately modeled as Mathieu–van der Pol–Duffing (MVDPD) oscillator [3], while the effect of SAW can be added as a delay coupling term, because of finite time involved in travel of this signal, resulting in a set of delay differential equations (DDEs). Various solutions for different parameter values are identified and the synchronization regions mapped under the case of a general dissipative type coupling. Numerical integration of the DDE for the system as well as the ODE obtained by applying the Krylov–Bogoliubov averaging method to the same is used for detailed analysis. The averaged equations are further reduced to get a phase equation which can be used to map the regions of synchronization at a much smaller computational budget. It is found that in general the delay terms lead to an increase in the synchronization region, while a cubic coupling term would be more effective. Effect of different parameters of individual oscillator on synchronization is also studied, which provide guidance for fabrication and testing of the optimized system. Synchronization (dpeaa)DE-He213 MEMS (dpeaa)DE-He213 Nonlinear dynamics (dpeaa)DE-He213 Delay (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pandey, M. verfasserin aut Enthalten in International Journal of Advances in Engineering Sciences and Applied Mathematics Springer-Verlag, 2009 12(2020), 3-4 vom: Dez., Seite 218-232 (DE-627)SPR026154293 nnns volume:12 year:2020 number:3-4 month:12 pages:218-232 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12572-020-00277-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 12 2020 3-4 12 218-232 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s12572-020-00277-3 doi (DE-627)SPR043186831 (DE-599)SPRs12572-020-00277-3-e (SPR)s12572-020-00277-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Govind, M. verfasserin aut Synchronization of surface acoustic wave (SAW)-based delay-coupled self-oscillating MEMS 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Coupled limit cycle oscillators have potential usage in neurocomputing, pattern recognition, signal processing units such as multilayer perceptrons and stable timekeeping devices. Here, we study the synchronization dynamics of parametrically excited coupled dome-shaped MEMS (microelectromechanical system), exhibiting limit cycle oscillations and hysteresis, which have previously been shown to synchronize with an external reference signal [1, 2]. The coupling considered here is through surface acoustic wave (SAW), emanating in the substrate near each oscillator, due to periodic forcing of the same, which acts as a base vibration term for the forced oscillator. Dynamics of the individual MEMS can be adequately modeled as Mathieu–van der Pol–Duffing (MVDPD) oscillator [3], while the effect of SAW can be added as a delay coupling term, because of finite time involved in travel of this signal, resulting in a set of delay differential equations (DDEs). Various solutions for different parameter values are identified and the synchronization regions mapped under the case of a general dissipative type coupling. Numerical integration of the DDE for the system as well as the ODE obtained by applying the Krylov–Bogoliubov averaging method to the same is used for detailed analysis. The averaged equations are further reduced to get a phase equation which can be used to map the regions of synchronization at a much smaller computational budget. It is found that in general the delay terms lead to an increase in the synchronization region, while a cubic coupling term would be more effective. Effect of different parameters of individual oscillator on synchronization is also studied, which provide guidance for fabrication and testing of the optimized system. Synchronization (dpeaa)DE-He213 MEMS (dpeaa)DE-He213 Nonlinear dynamics (dpeaa)DE-He213 Delay (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pandey, M. verfasserin aut Enthalten in International Journal of Advances in Engineering Sciences and Applied Mathematics Springer-Verlag, 2009 12(2020), 3-4 vom: Dez., Seite 218-232 (DE-627)SPR026154293 nnns volume:12 year:2020 number:3-4 month:12 pages:218-232 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12572-020-00277-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 12 2020 3-4 12 218-232 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in International Journal of Advances in Engineering Sciences and Applied Mathematics 12(2020), 3-4 vom: Dez., Seite 218-232 volume:12 year:2020 number:3-4 month:12 pages:218-232 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in International Journal of Advances in Engineering Sciences and Applied Mathematics 12(2020), 3-4 vom: Dez., Seite 218-232 volume:12 year:2020 number:3-4 month:12 pages:218-232 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Synchronization MEMS Nonlinear dynamics Delay |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
International Journal of Advances in Engineering Sciences and Applied Mathematics |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Govind, M. @@aut@@ Pandey, M. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-12-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
SPR026154293 |
| id |
SPR043186831 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR043186831</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210216064855.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210216s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s12572-020-00277-3</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR043186831</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)SPRs12572-020-00277-3-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s12572-020-00277-3-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Govind, M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Synchronization of surface acoustic wave (SAW)-based delay-coupled self-oscillating MEMS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Coupled limit cycle oscillators have potential usage in neurocomputing, pattern recognition, signal processing units such as multilayer perceptrons and stable timekeeping devices. Here, we study the synchronization dynamics of parametrically excited coupled dome-shaped MEMS (microelectromechanical system), exhibiting limit cycle oscillations and hysteresis, which have previously been shown to synchronize with an external reference signal [1, 2]. The coupling considered here is through surface acoustic wave (SAW), emanating in the substrate near each oscillator, due to periodic forcing of the same, which acts as a base vibration term for the forced oscillator. Dynamics of the individual MEMS can be adequately modeled as Mathieu–van der Pol–Duffing (MVDPD) oscillator [3], while the effect of SAW can be added as a delay coupling term, because of finite time involved in travel of this signal, resulting in a set of delay differential equations (DDEs). Various solutions for different parameter values are identified and the synchronization regions mapped under the case of a general dissipative type coupling. Numerical integration of the DDE for the system as well as the ODE obtained by applying the Krylov–Bogoliubov averaging method to the same is used for detailed analysis. The averaged equations are further reduced to get a phase equation which can be used to map the regions of synchronization at a much smaller computational budget. It is found that in general the delay terms lead to an increase in the synchronization region, while a cubic coupling term would be more effective. Effect of different parameters of individual oscillator on synchronization is also studied, which provide guidance for fabrication and testing of the optimized system.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Synchronization</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">MEMS</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nonlinear dynamics</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Delay</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pandey, M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">International Journal of Advances in Engineering Sciences and Applied Mathematics</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">12(2020), 3-4 vom: Dez., Seite 218-232</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR026154293</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:12</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3-4</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:218-232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12572-020-00277-3</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">12</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">3-4</subfield><subfield code="c">12</subfield><subfield code="h">218-232</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Govind, M. |
| spellingShingle |
Govind, M. misc Synchronization misc MEMS misc Nonlinear dynamics misc Delay Synchronization of surface acoustic wave (SAW)-based delay-coupled self-oscillating MEMS |
| authorStr |
Govind, M. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)SPR026154293 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
Synchronization of surface acoustic wave (SAW)-based delay-coupled self-oscillating MEMS Synchronization (dpeaa)DE-He213 MEMS (dpeaa)DE-He213 Nonlinear dynamics (dpeaa)DE-He213 Delay (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
misc Synchronization misc MEMS misc Nonlinear dynamics misc Delay |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Synchronization misc MEMS misc Nonlinear dynamics misc Delay |
| topic_browse |
misc Synchronization misc MEMS misc Nonlinear dynamics misc Delay |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
International Journal of Advances in Engineering Sciences and Applied Mathematics |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
SPR026154293 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
International Journal of Advances in Engineering Sciences and Applied Mathematics |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)SPR026154293 |
| title |
Synchronization of surface acoustic wave (SAW)-based delay-coupled self-oscillating MEMS |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR043186831 (DE-599)SPRs12572-020-00277-3-e (SPR)s12572-020-00277-3-e |
| title_full |
Synchronization of surface acoustic wave (SAW)-based delay-coupled self-oscillating MEMS |
| author_sort |
Govind, M. |
| journal |
International Journal of Advances in Engineering Sciences and Applied Mathematics |
| journalStr |
International Journal of Advances in Engineering Sciences and Applied Mathematics |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
218 |
| author_browse |
Govind, M. Pandey, M. |
| container_volume |
12 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Govind, M. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s12572-020-00277-3 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
synchronization of surface acoustic wave (saw)-based delay-coupled self-oscillating mems |
| title_auth |
Synchronization of surface acoustic wave (SAW)-based delay-coupled self-oscillating MEMS |
| abstract |
Abstract Coupled limit cycle oscillators have potential usage in neurocomputing, pattern recognition, signal processing units such as multilayer perceptrons and stable timekeeping devices. Here, we study the synchronization dynamics of parametrically excited coupled dome-shaped MEMS (microelectromechanical system), exhibiting limit cycle oscillations and hysteresis, which have previously been shown to synchronize with an external reference signal [1, 2]. The coupling considered here is through surface acoustic wave (SAW), emanating in the substrate near each oscillator, due to periodic forcing of the same, which acts as a base vibration term for the forced oscillator. Dynamics of the individual MEMS can be adequately modeled as Mathieu–van der Pol–Duffing (MVDPD) oscillator [3], while the effect of SAW can be added as a delay coupling term, because of finite time involved in travel of this signal, resulting in a set of delay differential equations (DDEs). Various solutions for different parameter values are identified and the synchronization regions mapped under the case of a general dissipative type coupling. Numerical integration of the DDE for the system as well as the ODE obtained by applying the Krylov–Bogoliubov averaging method to the same is used for detailed analysis. The averaged equations are further reduced to get a phase equation which can be used to map the regions of synchronization at a much smaller computational budget. It is found that in general the delay terms lead to an increase in the synchronization region, while a cubic coupling term would be more effective. Effect of different parameters of individual oscillator on synchronization is also studied, which provide guidance for fabrication and testing of the optimized system. |
| abstractGer |
Abstract Coupled limit cycle oscillators have potential usage in neurocomputing, pattern recognition, signal processing units such as multilayer perceptrons and stable timekeeping devices. Here, we study the synchronization dynamics of parametrically excited coupled dome-shaped MEMS (microelectromechanical system), exhibiting limit cycle oscillations and hysteresis, which have previously been shown to synchronize with an external reference signal [1, 2]. The coupling considered here is through surface acoustic wave (SAW), emanating in the substrate near each oscillator, due to periodic forcing of the same, which acts as a base vibration term for the forced oscillator. Dynamics of the individual MEMS can be adequately modeled as Mathieu–van der Pol–Duffing (MVDPD) oscillator [3], while the effect of SAW can be added as a delay coupling term, because of finite time involved in travel of this signal, resulting in a set of delay differential equations (DDEs). Various solutions for different parameter values are identified and the synchronization regions mapped under the case of a general dissipative type coupling. Numerical integration of the DDE for the system as well as the ODE obtained by applying the Krylov–Bogoliubov averaging method to the same is used for detailed analysis. The averaged equations are further reduced to get a phase equation which can be used to map the regions of synchronization at a much smaller computational budget. It is found that in general the delay terms lead to an increase in the synchronization region, while a cubic coupling term would be more effective. Effect of different parameters of individual oscillator on synchronization is also studied, which provide guidance for fabrication and testing of the optimized system. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Coupled limit cycle oscillators have potential usage in neurocomputing, pattern recognition, signal processing units such as multilayer perceptrons and stable timekeeping devices. Here, we study the synchronization dynamics of parametrically excited coupled dome-shaped MEMS (microelectromechanical system), exhibiting limit cycle oscillations and hysteresis, which have previously been shown to synchronize with an external reference signal [1, 2]. The coupling considered here is through surface acoustic wave (SAW), emanating in the substrate near each oscillator, due to periodic forcing of the same, which acts as a base vibration term for the forced oscillator. Dynamics of the individual MEMS can be adequately modeled as Mathieu–van der Pol–Duffing (MVDPD) oscillator [3], while the effect of SAW can be added as a delay coupling term, because of finite time involved in travel of this signal, resulting in a set of delay differential equations (DDEs). Various solutions for different parameter values are identified and the synchronization regions mapped under the case of a general dissipative type coupling. Numerical integration of the DDE for the system as well as the ODE obtained by applying the Krylov–Bogoliubov averaging method to the same is used for detailed analysis. The averaged equations are further reduced to get a phase equation which can be used to map the regions of synchronization at a much smaller computational budget. It is found that in general the delay terms lead to an increase in the synchronization region, while a cubic coupling term would be more effective. Effect of different parameters of individual oscillator on synchronization is also studied, which provide guidance for fabrication and testing of the optimized system. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER |
| container_issue |
3-4 |
| title_short |
Synchronization of surface acoustic wave (SAW)-based delay-coupled self-oscillating MEMS |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12572-020-00277-3 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Pandey, M. |
| author2Str |
Pandey, M. |
| ppnlink |
SPR026154293 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s12572-020-00277-3 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T17:06:20.041Z |
| _version_ |
1803578381479968768 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR043186831</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20210216064855.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210216s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s12572-020-00277-3</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR043186831</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)SPRs12572-020-00277-3-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s12572-020-00277-3-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Govind, M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Synchronization of surface acoustic wave (SAW)-based delay-coupled self-oscillating MEMS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Coupled limit cycle oscillators have potential usage in neurocomputing, pattern recognition, signal processing units such as multilayer perceptrons and stable timekeeping devices. Here, we study the synchronization dynamics of parametrically excited coupled dome-shaped MEMS (microelectromechanical system), exhibiting limit cycle oscillations and hysteresis, which have previously been shown to synchronize with an external reference signal [1, 2]. The coupling considered here is through surface acoustic wave (SAW), emanating in the substrate near each oscillator, due to periodic forcing of the same, which acts as a base vibration term for the forced oscillator. Dynamics of the individual MEMS can be adequately modeled as Mathieu–van der Pol–Duffing (MVDPD) oscillator [3], while the effect of SAW can be added as a delay coupling term, because of finite time involved in travel of this signal, resulting in a set of delay differential equations (DDEs). Various solutions for different parameter values are identified and the synchronization regions mapped under the case of a general dissipative type coupling. Numerical integration of the DDE for the system as well as the ODE obtained by applying the Krylov–Bogoliubov averaging method to the same is used for detailed analysis. The averaged equations are further reduced to get a phase equation which can be used to map the regions of synchronization at a much smaller computational budget. It is found that in general the delay terms lead to an increase in the synchronization region, while a cubic coupling term would be more effective. Effect of different parameters of individual oscillator on synchronization is also studied, which provide guidance for fabrication and testing of the optimized system.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Synchronization</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">MEMS</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nonlinear dynamics</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Delay</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pandey, M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">International Journal of Advances in Engineering Sciences and Applied Mathematics</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">12(2020), 3-4 vom: Dez., Seite 218-232</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR026154293</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:12</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3-4</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:218-232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12572-020-00277-3</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">12</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">3-4</subfield><subfield code="c">12</subfield><subfield code="h">218-232</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4013834 |