The functional responses of two benthic algivorous ciliated protozoa with differing feeding strategies
Abstract Surface-associated algivorous ciliated protozoa are common in the benthos of streams, but little is known about the feeding ecology of these organisms. We compared the functional responses of two algivorous ciliated protozoa, Oxytricha fallax (a filter feeder) and Trithigmostoma cucullulus...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Balczon, J. M. [verfasserIn] Pratt, J. R. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
1996 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Microbial ecology - New York, NY : Springer, 1974, 31(1996), 2 vom: 01. März, Seite 209-224 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:31 ; year:1996 ; number:2 ; day:01 ; month:03 ; pages:209-224 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/BF00167866 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR043591035 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR043591035 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230519222555.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210324s1996 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/BF00167866 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR043591035 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)SPRBF00167866-e | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)BF00167866-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 570 |q ASE |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 570 |q ASE |
| 084 | |a 42.90 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Balczon, J. M. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The functional responses of two benthic algivorous ciliated protozoa with differing feeding strategies |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1996 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Surface-associated algivorous ciliated protozoa are common in the benthos of streams, but little is known about the feeding ecology of these organisms. We compared the functional responses of two algivorous ciliated protozoa, Oxytricha fallax (a filter feeder) and Trithigmostoma cucullulus (an encounter feeder). The ciliates were fed 14C-labeled Navicula cryptocephala in laboratory feeding experiments to determine their potential to consume significant amounts of algal prey. Logistic regression, and plots of the proportion of N. cryptocephala ingested vs. the total number offered, indicated functional responses of a typical rectangular hyperbolic (type II) form for both ciliates. Ingestion rates were estimated from regressions of the number of 14C-labeled N. cryptocephala cells ingested per ciliate vs. time. Maximum feeding rates and half-saturation concentrations were estimated by fitting the observed ingestion rates and experimental algal densities to a function of the Michaelis-Menten enzyme kinetics form using nonlinear regression. For O. fallax, the maximum feeding rate was estimated to be 1.07 N. cryptocephala cells per minute, and the half-saturation concentration was 3.9 × 102 N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. For T. cucullulus the maximum feeding rate was estimated to be 0.2 N. cryptocephala per minute, and the half-saturation concentration was 5.4 × $ 10^{3} $N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. The data were also fitted using only the number of cells ingested at 60 and 120 min, by converting the endpoint consumption to rates. For O. fallax, the estimated maximum feeding rates were 1.3 and 1.0 N. cryptocephala per minute for 60 and 120 min, respectively, and estimated half-saturation concentrations were 5.1 × $ 10^{2} $ and 3.5 × $ 10^{2} $N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. For T. cucullulus, estimated maximum feeding rates were 0.6 and 0.4 N. cryptocephala per minute for 60 and 120 min, respectively, and estimated half-saturation concentrations were 1.5 × $ 10^{4} $ and 1.1 × 104 N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. These results suggest that kinetic methods for estimating ingestion rates are more accurate than endpoint determinations. Based on field observations of periphyton densities, these ciliates potentially are consuming 4.8% of the total available standing crop of diatom biomass per day and this could represent up to 16% of total available daily primary production. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Logistic Regression |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ingestion Rate |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Functional Response |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Standing Crop |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Navicula |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pratt, J. R. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Microbial ecology |d New York, NY : Springer, 1974 |g 31(1996), 2 vom: 01. März, Seite 209-224 |w (DE-627)254630197 |w (DE-600)1462065-0 |x 1432-184X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:31 |g year:1996 |g number:2 |g day:01 |g month:03 |g pages:209-224 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00167866 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_101 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_120 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_121 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_138 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_150 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_152 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_171 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_187 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_267 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_374 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_381 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_647 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2001 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2007 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2008 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2010 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2018 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2021 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2026 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2027 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2031 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2037 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2038 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2039 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2043 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2050 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2056 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2057 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2059 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2061 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2064 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2065 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2068 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2088 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2093 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2106 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2107 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2108 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2110 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2113 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2116 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2118 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2119 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2122 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2129 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2143 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2144 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2147 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2148 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2152 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2153 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2158 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2188 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2190 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2193 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2232 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2336 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2446 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2470 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2472 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2507 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2522 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2548 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2808 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2939 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2946 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2949 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2951 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4046 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4242 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4246 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4251 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4277 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4328 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4333 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4334 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4336 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4346 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4393 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4753 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 42.90 |q ASE |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 31 |j 1996 |e 2 |b 01 |c 03 |h 209-224 | ||
| author_variant |
j m b jm jmb j r p jr jrp |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:1432184X:1996----::hfntoarsossfwbnhclioosiitdrtzaihi |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
1996 |
| bklnumber |
42.90 |
| publishDate |
1996 |
| allfields |
10.1007/BF00167866 doi (DE-627)SPR043591035 (DE-599)SPRBF00167866-e (SPR)BF00167866-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 ASE 570 ASE 42.90 bkl Balczon, J. M. verfasserin aut The functional responses of two benthic algivorous ciliated protozoa with differing feeding strategies 1996 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Surface-associated algivorous ciliated protozoa are common in the benthos of streams, but little is known about the feeding ecology of these organisms. We compared the functional responses of two algivorous ciliated protozoa, Oxytricha fallax (a filter feeder) and Trithigmostoma cucullulus (an encounter feeder). The ciliates were fed 14C-labeled Navicula cryptocephala in laboratory feeding experiments to determine their potential to consume significant amounts of algal prey. Logistic regression, and plots of the proportion of N. cryptocephala ingested vs. the total number offered, indicated functional responses of a typical rectangular hyperbolic (type II) form for both ciliates. Ingestion rates were estimated from regressions of the number of 14C-labeled N. cryptocephala cells ingested per ciliate vs. time. Maximum feeding rates and half-saturation concentrations were estimated by fitting the observed ingestion rates and experimental algal densities to a function of the Michaelis-Menten enzyme kinetics form using nonlinear regression. For O. fallax, the maximum feeding rate was estimated to be 1.07 N. cryptocephala cells per minute, and the half-saturation concentration was 3.9 × 102 N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. For T. cucullulus the maximum feeding rate was estimated to be 0.2 N. cryptocephala per minute, and the half-saturation concentration was 5.4 × $ 10^{3} $N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. The data were also fitted using only the number of cells ingested at 60 and 120 min, by converting the endpoint consumption to rates. For O. fallax, the estimated maximum feeding rates were 1.3 and 1.0 N. cryptocephala per minute for 60 and 120 min, respectively, and estimated half-saturation concentrations were 5.1 × $ 10^{2} $ and 3.5 × $ 10^{2} $N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. For T. cucullulus, estimated maximum feeding rates were 0.6 and 0.4 N. cryptocephala per minute for 60 and 120 min, respectively, and estimated half-saturation concentrations were 1.5 × $ 10^{4} $ and 1.1 × 104 N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. These results suggest that kinetic methods for estimating ingestion rates are more accurate than endpoint determinations. Based on field observations of periphyton densities, these ciliates potentially are consuming 4.8% of the total available standing crop of diatom biomass per day and this could represent up to 16% of total available daily primary production. Logistic Regression (dpeaa)DE-He213 Ingestion Rate (dpeaa)DE-He213 Functional Response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Standing Crop (dpeaa)DE-He213 Navicula (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pratt, J. R. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Microbial ecology New York, NY : Springer, 1974 31(1996), 2 vom: 01. März, Seite 209-224 (DE-627)254630197 (DE-600)1462065-0 1432-184X nnns volume:31 year:1996 number:2 day:01 month:03 pages:209-224 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00167866 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_121 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_381 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_647 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2043 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2158 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2193 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_2808 GBV_ILN_2939 GBV_ILN_2946 GBV_ILN_2949 GBV_ILN_2951 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4277 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4346 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 42.90 ASE AR 31 1996 2 01 03 209-224 |
| spelling |
10.1007/BF00167866 doi (DE-627)SPR043591035 (DE-599)SPRBF00167866-e (SPR)BF00167866-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 ASE 570 ASE 42.90 bkl Balczon, J. M. verfasserin aut The functional responses of two benthic algivorous ciliated protozoa with differing feeding strategies 1996 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Surface-associated algivorous ciliated protozoa are common in the benthos of streams, but little is known about the feeding ecology of these organisms. We compared the functional responses of two algivorous ciliated protozoa, Oxytricha fallax (a filter feeder) and Trithigmostoma cucullulus (an encounter feeder). The ciliates were fed 14C-labeled Navicula cryptocephala in laboratory feeding experiments to determine their potential to consume significant amounts of algal prey. Logistic regression, and plots of the proportion of N. cryptocephala ingested vs. the total number offered, indicated functional responses of a typical rectangular hyperbolic (type II) form for both ciliates. Ingestion rates were estimated from regressions of the number of 14C-labeled N. cryptocephala cells ingested per ciliate vs. time. Maximum feeding rates and half-saturation concentrations were estimated by fitting the observed ingestion rates and experimental algal densities to a function of the Michaelis-Menten enzyme kinetics form using nonlinear regression. For O. fallax, the maximum feeding rate was estimated to be 1.07 N. cryptocephala cells per minute, and the half-saturation concentration was 3.9 × 102 N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. For T. cucullulus the maximum feeding rate was estimated to be 0.2 N. cryptocephala per minute, and the half-saturation concentration was 5.4 × $ 10^{3} $N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. The data were also fitted using only the number of cells ingested at 60 and 120 min, by converting the endpoint consumption to rates. For O. fallax, the estimated maximum feeding rates were 1.3 and 1.0 N. cryptocephala per minute for 60 and 120 min, respectively, and estimated half-saturation concentrations were 5.1 × $ 10^{2} $ and 3.5 × $ 10^{2} $N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. For T. cucullulus, estimated maximum feeding rates were 0.6 and 0.4 N. cryptocephala per minute for 60 and 120 min, respectively, and estimated half-saturation concentrations were 1.5 × $ 10^{4} $ and 1.1 × 104 N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. These results suggest that kinetic methods for estimating ingestion rates are more accurate than endpoint determinations. Based on field observations of periphyton densities, these ciliates potentially are consuming 4.8% of the total available standing crop of diatom biomass per day and this could represent up to 16% of total available daily primary production. Logistic Regression (dpeaa)DE-He213 Ingestion Rate (dpeaa)DE-He213 Functional Response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Standing Crop (dpeaa)DE-He213 Navicula (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pratt, J. R. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Microbial ecology New York, NY : Springer, 1974 31(1996), 2 vom: 01. März, Seite 209-224 (DE-627)254630197 (DE-600)1462065-0 1432-184X nnns volume:31 year:1996 number:2 day:01 month:03 pages:209-224 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00167866 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_121 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_381 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_647 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2043 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2158 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2193 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_2808 GBV_ILN_2939 GBV_ILN_2946 GBV_ILN_2949 GBV_ILN_2951 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4277 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4346 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 42.90 ASE AR 31 1996 2 01 03 209-224 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/BF00167866 doi (DE-627)SPR043591035 (DE-599)SPRBF00167866-e (SPR)BF00167866-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 ASE 570 ASE 42.90 bkl Balczon, J. M. verfasserin aut The functional responses of two benthic algivorous ciliated protozoa with differing feeding strategies 1996 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Surface-associated algivorous ciliated protozoa are common in the benthos of streams, but little is known about the feeding ecology of these organisms. We compared the functional responses of two algivorous ciliated protozoa, Oxytricha fallax (a filter feeder) and Trithigmostoma cucullulus (an encounter feeder). The ciliates were fed 14C-labeled Navicula cryptocephala in laboratory feeding experiments to determine their potential to consume significant amounts of algal prey. Logistic regression, and plots of the proportion of N. cryptocephala ingested vs. the total number offered, indicated functional responses of a typical rectangular hyperbolic (type II) form for both ciliates. Ingestion rates were estimated from regressions of the number of 14C-labeled N. cryptocephala cells ingested per ciliate vs. time. Maximum feeding rates and half-saturation concentrations were estimated by fitting the observed ingestion rates and experimental algal densities to a function of the Michaelis-Menten enzyme kinetics form using nonlinear regression. For O. fallax, the maximum feeding rate was estimated to be 1.07 N. cryptocephala cells per minute, and the half-saturation concentration was 3.9 × 102 N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. For T. cucullulus the maximum feeding rate was estimated to be 0.2 N. cryptocephala per minute, and the half-saturation concentration was 5.4 × $ 10^{3} $N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. The data were also fitted using only the number of cells ingested at 60 and 120 min, by converting the endpoint consumption to rates. For O. fallax, the estimated maximum feeding rates were 1.3 and 1.0 N. cryptocephala per minute for 60 and 120 min, respectively, and estimated half-saturation concentrations were 5.1 × $ 10^{2} $ and 3.5 × $ 10^{2} $N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. For T. cucullulus, estimated maximum feeding rates were 0.6 and 0.4 N. cryptocephala per minute for 60 and 120 min, respectively, and estimated half-saturation concentrations were 1.5 × $ 10^{4} $ and 1.1 × 104 N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. These results suggest that kinetic methods for estimating ingestion rates are more accurate than endpoint determinations. Based on field observations of periphyton densities, these ciliates potentially are consuming 4.8% of the total available standing crop of diatom biomass per day and this could represent up to 16% of total available daily primary production. Logistic Regression (dpeaa)DE-He213 Ingestion Rate (dpeaa)DE-He213 Functional Response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Standing Crop (dpeaa)DE-He213 Navicula (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pratt, J. R. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Microbial ecology New York, NY : Springer, 1974 31(1996), 2 vom: 01. März, Seite 209-224 (DE-627)254630197 (DE-600)1462065-0 1432-184X nnns volume:31 year:1996 number:2 day:01 month:03 pages:209-224 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00167866 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_121 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_381 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_647 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2043 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2158 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2193 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_2808 GBV_ILN_2939 GBV_ILN_2946 GBV_ILN_2949 GBV_ILN_2951 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4277 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4346 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 42.90 ASE AR 31 1996 2 01 03 209-224 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/BF00167866 doi (DE-627)SPR043591035 (DE-599)SPRBF00167866-e (SPR)BF00167866-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 ASE 570 ASE 42.90 bkl Balczon, J. M. verfasserin aut The functional responses of two benthic algivorous ciliated protozoa with differing feeding strategies 1996 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Surface-associated algivorous ciliated protozoa are common in the benthos of streams, but little is known about the feeding ecology of these organisms. We compared the functional responses of two algivorous ciliated protozoa, Oxytricha fallax (a filter feeder) and Trithigmostoma cucullulus (an encounter feeder). The ciliates were fed 14C-labeled Navicula cryptocephala in laboratory feeding experiments to determine their potential to consume significant amounts of algal prey. Logistic regression, and plots of the proportion of N. cryptocephala ingested vs. the total number offered, indicated functional responses of a typical rectangular hyperbolic (type II) form for both ciliates. Ingestion rates were estimated from regressions of the number of 14C-labeled N. cryptocephala cells ingested per ciliate vs. time. Maximum feeding rates and half-saturation concentrations were estimated by fitting the observed ingestion rates and experimental algal densities to a function of the Michaelis-Menten enzyme kinetics form using nonlinear regression. For O. fallax, the maximum feeding rate was estimated to be 1.07 N. cryptocephala cells per minute, and the half-saturation concentration was 3.9 × 102 N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. For T. cucullulus the maximum feeding rate was estimated to be 0.2 N. cryptocephala per minute, and the half-saturation concentration was 5.4 × $ 10^{3} $N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. The data were also fitted using only the number of cells ingested at 60 and 120 min, by converting the endpoint consumption to rates. For O. fallax, the estimated maximum feeding rates were 1.3 and 1.0 N. cryptocephala per minute for 60 and 120 min, respectively, and estimated half-saturation concentrations were 5.1 × $ 10^{2} $ and 3.5 × $ 10^{2} $N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. For T. cucullulus, estimated maximum feeding rates were 0.6 and 0.4 N. cryptocephala per minute for 60 and 120 min, respectively, and estimated half-saturation concentrations were 1.5 × $ 10^{4} $ and 1.1 × 104 N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. These results suggest that kinetic methods for estimating ingestion rates are more accurate than endpoint determinations. Based on field observations of periphyton densities, these ciliates potentially are consuming 4.8% of the total available standing crop of diatom biomass per day and this could represent up to 16% of total available daily primary production. Logistic Regression (dpeaa)DE-He213 Ingestion Rate (dpeaa)DE-He213 Functional Response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Standing Crop (dpeaa)DE-He213 Navicula (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pratt, J. R. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Microbial ecology New York, NY : Springer, 1974 31(1996), 2 vom: 01. März, Seite 209-224 (DE-627)254630197 (DE-600)1462065-0 1432-184X nnns volume:31 year:1996 number:2 day:01 month:03 pages:209-224 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00167866 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_121 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_381 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_647 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2043 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2158 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2193 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_2808 GBV_ILN_2939 GBV_ILN_2946 GBV_ILN_2949 GBV_ILN_2951 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4277 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4346 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 42.90 ASE AR 31 1996 2 01 03 209-224 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/BF00167866 doi (DE-627)SPR043591035 (DE-599)SPRBF00167866-e (SPR)BF00167866-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 ASE 570 ASE 42.90 bkl Balczon, J. M. verfasserin aut The functional responses of two benthic algivorous ciliated protozoa with differing feeding strategies 1996 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Surface-associated algivorous ciliated protozoa are common in the benthos of streams, but little is known about the feeding ecology of these organisms. We compared the functional responses of two algivorous ciliated protozoa, Oxytricha fallax (a filter feeder) and Trithigmostoma cucullulus (an encounter feeder). The ciliates were fed 14C-labeled Navicula cryptocephala in laboratory feeding experiments to determine their potential to consume significant amounts of algal prey. Logistic regression, and plots of the proportion of N. cryptocephala ingested vs. the total number offered, indicated functional responses of a typical rectangular hyperbolic (type II) form for both ciliates. Ingestion rates were estimated from regressions of the number of 14C-labeled N. cryptocephala cells ingested per ciliate vs. time. Maximum feeding rates and half-saturation concentrations were estimated by fitting the observed ingestion rates and experimental algal densities to a function of the Michaelis-Menten enzyme kinetics form using nonlinear regression. For O. fallax, the maximum feeding rate was estimated to be 1.07 N. cryptocephala cells per minute, and the half-saturation concentration was 3.9 × 102 N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. For T. cucullulus the maximum feeding rate was estimated to be 0.2 N. cryptocephala per minute, and the half-saturation concentration was 5.4 × $ 10^{3} $N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. The data were also fitted using only the number of cells ingested at 60 and 120 min, by converting the endpoint consumption to rates. For O. fallax, the estimated maximum feeding rates were 1.3 and 1.0 N. cryptocephala per minute for 60 and 120 min, respectively, and estimated half-saturation concentrations were 5.1 × $ 10^{2} $ and 3.5 × $ 10^{2} $N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. For T. cucullulus, estimated maximum feeding rates were 0.6 and 0.4 N. cryptocephala per minute for 60 and 120 min, respectively, and estimated half-saturation concentrations were 1.5 × $ 10^{4} $ and 1.1 × 104 N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. These results suggest that kinetic methods for estimating ingestion rates are more accurate than endpoint determinations. Based on field observations of periphyton densities, these ciliates potentially are consuming 4.8% of the total available standing crop of diatom biomass per day and this could represent up to 16% of total available daily primary production. Logistic Regression (dpeaa)DE-He213 Ingestion Rate (dpeaa)DE-He213 Functional Response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Standing Crop (dpeaa)DE-He213 Navicula (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pratt, J. R. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Microbial ecology New York, NY : Springer, 1974 31(1996), 2 vom: 01. März, Seite 209-224 (DE-627)254630197 (DE-600)1462065-0 1432-184X nnns volume:31 year:1996 number:2 day:01 month:03 pages:209-224 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00167866 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_121 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_381 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_647 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2043 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2158 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2193 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_2808 GBV_ILN_2939 GBV_ILN_2946 GBV_ILN_2949 GBV_ILN_2951 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4277 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4346 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 42.90 ASE AR 31 1996 2 01 03 209-224 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Microbial ecology 31(1996), 2 vom: 01. März, Seite 209-224 volume:31 year:1996 number:2 day:01 month:03 pages:209-224 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Microbial ecology 31(1996), 2 vom: 01. März, Seite 209-224 volume:31 year:1996 number:2 day:01 month:03 pages:209-224 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Logistic Regression Ingestion Rate Functional Response Standing Crop Navicula |
| dewey-raw |
570 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Microbial ecology |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Balczon, J. M. @@aut@@ Pratt, J. R. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
1996-03-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
254630197 |
| dewey-sort |
3570 |
| id |
SPR043591035 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR043591035</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519222555.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210324s1996 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/BF00167866</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR043591035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)SPRBF00167866-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)BF00167866-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">42.90</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Balczon, J. M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The functional responses of two benthic algivorous ciliated protozoa with differing feeding strategies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1996</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Surface-associated algivorous ciliated protozoa are common in the benthos of streams, but little is known about the feeding ecology of these organisms. We compared the functional responses of two algivorous ciliated protozoa, Oxytricha fallax (a filter feeder) and Trithigmostoma cucullulus (an encounter feeder). The ciliates were fed 14C-labeled Navicula cryptocephala in laboratory feeding experiments to determine their potential to consume significant amounts of algal prey. Logistic regression, and plots of the proportion of N. cryptocephala ingested vs. the total number offered, indicated functional responses of a typical rectangular hyperbolic (type II) form for both ciliates. Ingestion rates were estimated from regressions of the number of 14C-labeled N. cryptocephala cells ingested per ciliate vs. time. Maximum feeding rates and half-saturation concentrations were estimated by fitting the observed ingestion rates and experimental algal densities to a function of the Michaelis-Menten enzyme kinetics form using nonlinear regression. For O. fallax, the maximum feeding rate was estimated to be 1.07 N. cryptocephala cells per minute, and the half-saturation concentration was 3.9 × 102 N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. For T. cucullulus the maximum feeding rate was estimated to be 0.2 N. cryptocephala per minute, and the half-saturation concentration was 5.4 × $ 10^{3} $N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. The data were also fitted using only the number of cells ingested at 60 and 120 min, by converting the endpoint consumption to rates. For O. fallax, the estimated maximum feeding rates were 1.3 and 1.0 N. cryptocephala per minute for 60 and 120 min, respectively, and estimated half-saturation concentrations were 5.1 × $ 10^{2} $ and 3.5 × $ 10^{2} $N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. For T. cucullulus, estimated maximum feeding rates were 0.6 and 0.4 N. cryptocephala per minute for 60 and 120 min, respectively, and estimated half-saturation concentrations were 1.5 × $ 10^{4} $ and 1.1 × 104 N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. These results suggest that kinetic methods for estimating ingestion rates are more accurate than endpoint determinations. Based on field observations of periphyton densities, these ciliates potentially are consuming 4.8% of the total available standing crop of diatom biomass per day and this could represent up to 16% of total available daily primary production.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Logistic Regression</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ingestion Rate</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Functional Response</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Standing Crop</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Navicula</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pratt, J. R.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Microbial ecology</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY : Springer, 1974</subfield><subfield code="g">31(1996), 2 vom: 01. März, Seite 209-224</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)254630197</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1462065-0</subfield><subfield code="x">1432-184X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:31</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1996</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:01</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:209-224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00167866</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_121</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_374</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_381</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_647</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2043</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2116</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2158</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2193</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2808</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2939</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2946</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2949</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2951</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4277</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4346</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4753</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">42.90</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">31</subfield><subfield code="j">1996</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">01</subfield><subfield code="c">03</subfield><subfield code="h">209-224</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Balczon, J. M. |
| spellingShingle |
Balczon, J. M. ddc 570 bkl 42.90 misc Logistic Regression misc Ingestion Rate misc Functional Response misc Standing Crop misc Navicula The functional responses of two benthic algivorous ciliated protozoa with differing feeding strategies |
| authorStr |
Balczon, J. M. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)254630197 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
570 - Life sciences; biology |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1432-184X |
| topic_title |
570 ASE 42.90 bkl The functional responses of two benthic algivorous ciliated protozoa with differing feeding strategies Logistic Regression (dpeaa)DE-He213 Ingestion Rate (dpeaa)DE-He213 Functional Response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Standing Crop (dpeaa)DE-He213 Navicula (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
ddc 570 bkl 42.90 misc Logistic Regression misc Ingestion Rate misc Functional Response misc Standing Crop misc Navicula |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 570 bkl 42.90 misc Logistic Regression misc Ingestion Rate misc Functional Response misc Standing Crop misc Navicula |
| topic_browse |
ddc 570 bkl 42.90 misc Logistic Regression misc Ingestion Rate misc Functional Response misc Standing Crop misc Navicula |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Microbial ecology |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
254630197 |
| dewey-tens |
570 - Life sciences; biology |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Microbial ecology |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)254630197 (DE-600)1462065-0 |
| title |
The functional responses of two benthic algivorous ciliated protozoa with differing feeding strategies |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR043591035 (DE-599)SPRBF00167866-e (SPR)BF00167866-e |
| title_full |
The functional responses of two benthic algivorous ciliated protozoa with differing feeding strategies |
| author_sort |
Balczon, J. M. |
| journal |
Microbial ecology |
| journalStr |
Microbial ecology |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
1996 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
209 |
| author_browse |
Balczon, J. M. Pratt, J. R. |
| container_volume |
31 |
| class |
570 ASE 42.90 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Balczon, J. M. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/BF00167866 |
| dewey-full |
570 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
functional responses of two benthic algivorous ciliated protozoa with differing feeding strategies |
| title_auth |
The functional responses of two benthic algivorous ciliated protozoa with differing feeding strategies |
| abstract |
Abstract Surface-associated algivorous ciliated protozoa are common in the benthos of streams, but little is known about the feeding ecology of these organisms. We compared the functional responses of two algivorous ciliated protozoa, Oxytricha fallax (a filter feeder) and Trithigmostoma cucullulus (an encounter feeder). The ciliates were fed 14C-labeled Navicula cryptocephala in laboratory feeding experiments to determine their potential to consume significant amounts of algal prey. Logistic regression, and plots of the proportion of N. cryptocephala ingested vs. the total number offered, indicated functional responses of a typical rectangular hyperbolic (type II) form for both ciliates. Ingestion rates were estimated from regressions of the number of 14C-labeled N. cryptocephala cells ingested per ciliate vs. time. Maximum feeding rates and half-saturation concentrations were estimated by fitting the observed ingestion rates and experimental algal densities to a function of the Michaelis-Menten enzyme kinetics form using nonlinear regression. For O. fallax, the maximum feeding rate was estimated to be 1.07 N. cryptocephala cells per minute, and the half-saturation concentration was 3.9 × 102 N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. For T. cucullulus the maximum feeding rate was estimated to be 0.2 N. cryptocephala per minute, and the half-saturation concentration was 5.4 × $ 10^{3} $N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. The data were also fitted using only the number of cells ingested at 60 and 120 min, by converting the endpoint consumption to rates. For O. fallax, the estimated maximum feeding rates were 1.3 and 1.0 N. cryptocephala per minute for 60 and 120 min, respectively, and estimated half-saturation concentrations were 5.1 × $ 10^{2} $ and 3.5 × $ 10^{2} $N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. For T. cucullulus, estimated maximum feeding rates were 0.6 and 0.4 N. cryptocephala per minute for 60 and 120 min, respectively, and estimated half-saturation concentrations were 1.5 × $ 10^{4} $ and 1.1 × 104 N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. These results suggest that kinetic methods for estimating ingestion rates are more accurate than endpoint determinations. Based on field observations of periphyton densities, these ciliates potentially are consuming 4.8% of the total available standing crop of diatom biomass per day and this could represent up to 16% of total available daily primary production. |
| abstractGer |
Abstract Surface-associated algivorous ciliated protozoa are common in the benthos of streams, but little is known about the feeding ecology of these organisms. We compared the functional responses of two algivorous ciliated protozoa, Oxytricha fallax (a filter feeder) and Trithigmostoma cucullulus (an encounter feeder). The ciliates were fed 14C-labeled Navicula cryptocephala in laboratory feeding experiments to determine their potential to consume significant amounts of algal prey. Logistic regression, and plots of the proportion of N. cryptocephala ingested vs. the total number offered, indicated functional responses of a typical rectangular hyperbolic (type II) form for both ciliates. Ingestion rates were estimated from regressions of the number of 14C-labeled N. cryptocephala cells ingested per ciliate vs. time. Maximum feeding rates and half-saturation concentrations were estimated by fitting the observed ingestion rates and experimental algal densities to a function of the Michaelis-Menten enzyme kinetics form using nonlinear regression. For O. fallax, the maximum feeding rate was estimated to be 1.07 N. cryptocephala cells per minute, and the half-saturation concentration was 3.9 × 102 N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. For T. cucullulus the maximum feeding rate was estimated to be 0.2 N. cryptocephala per minute, and the half-saturation concentration was 5.4 × $ 10^{3} $N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. The data were also fitted using only the number of cells ingested at 60 and 120 min, by converting the endpoint consumption to rates. For O. fallax, the estimated maximum feeding rates were 1.3 and 1.0 N. cryptocephala per minute for 60 and 120 min, respectively, and estimated half-saturation concentrations were 5.1 × $ 10^{2} $ and 3.5 × $ 10^{2} $N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. For T. cucullulus, estimated maximum feeding rates were 0.6 and 0.4 N. cryptocephala per minute for 60 and 120 min, respectively, and estimated half-saturation concentrations were 1.5 × $ 10^{4} $ and 1.1 × 104 N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. These results suggest that kinetic methods for estimating ingestion rates are more accurate than endpoint determinations. Based on field observations of periphyton densities, these ciliates potentially are consuming 4.8% of the total available standing crop of diatom biomass per day and this could represent up to 16% of total available daily primary production. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Surface-associated algivorous ciliated protozoa are common in the benthos of streams, but little is known about the feeding ecology of these organisms. We compared the functional responses of two algivorous ciliated protozoa, Oxytricha fallax (a filter feeder) and Trithigmostoma cucullulus (an encounter feeder). The ciliates were fed 14C-labeled Navicula cryptocephala in laboratory feeding experiments to determine their potential to consume significant amounts of algal prey. Logistic regression, and plots of the proportion of N. cryptocephala ingested vs. the total number offered, indicated functional responses of a typical rectangular hyperbolic (type II) form for both ciliates. Ingestion rates were estimated from regressions of the number of 14C-labeled N. cryptocephala cells ingested per ciliate vs. time. Maximum feeding rates and half-saturation concentrations were estimated by fitting the observed ingestion rates and experimental algal densities to a function of the Michaelis-Menten enzyme kinetics form using nonlinear regression. For O. fallax, the maximum feeding rate was estimated to be 1.07 N. cryptocephala cells per minute, and the half-saturation concentration was 3.9 × 102 N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. For T. cucullulus the maximum feeding rate was estimated to be 0.2 N. cryptocephala per minute, and the half-saturation concentration was 5.4 × $ 10^{3} $N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. The data were also fitted using only the number of cells ingested at 60 and 120 min, by converting the endpoint consumption to rates. For O. fallax, the estimated maximum feeding rates were 1.3 and 1.0 N. cryptocephala per minute for 60 and 120 min, respectively, and estimated half-saturation concentrations were 5.1 × $ 10^{2} $ and 3.5 × $ 10^{2} $N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. For T. cucullulus, estimated maximum feeding rates were 0.6 and 0.4 N. cryptocephala per minute for 60 and 120 min, respectively, and estimated half-saturation concentrations were 1.5 × $ 10^{4} $ and 1.1 × 104 N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. These results suggest that kinetic methods for estimating ingestion rates are more accurate than endpoint determinations. Based on field observations of periphyton densities, these ciliates potentially are consuming 4.8% of the total available standing crop of diatom biomass per day and this could represent up to 16% of total available daily primary production. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_121 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_381 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_647 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2043 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2116 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2158 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2193 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_2808 GBV_ILN_2939 GBV_ILN_2946 GBV_ILN_2949 GBV_ILN_2951 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4277 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4346 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
The functional responses of two benthic algivorous ciliated protozoa with differing feeding strategies |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00167866 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Pratt, J. R. |
| author2Str |
Pratt, J. R. |
| ppnlink |
254630197 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/BF00167866 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T19:38:40.278Z |
| _version_ |
1803587965717315584 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR043591035</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519222555.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210324s1996 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/BF00167866</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR043591035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)SPRBF00167866-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)BF00167866-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">42.90</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Balczon, J. M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The functional responses of two benthic algivorous ciliated protozoa with differing feeding strategies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">1996</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Surface-associated algivorous ciliated protozoa are common in the benthos of streams, but little is known about the feeding ecology of these organisms. We compared the functional responses of two algivorous ciliated protozoa, Oxytricha fallax (a filter feeder) and Trithigmostoma cucullulus (an encounter feeder). The ciliates were fed 14C-labeled Navicula cryptocephala in laboratory feeding experiments to determine their potential to consume significant amounts of algal prey. Logistic regression, and plots of the proportion of N. cryptocephala ingested vs. the total number offered, indicated functional responses of a typical rectangular hyperbolic (type II) form for both ciliates. Ingestion rates were estimated from regressions of the number of 14C-labeled N. cryptocephala cells ingested per ciliate vs. time. Maximum feeding rates and half-saturation concentrations were estimated by fitting the observed ingestion rates and experimental algal densities to a function of the Michaelis-Menten enzyme kinetics form using nonlinear regression. For O. fallax, the maximum feeding rate was estimated to be 1.07 N. cryptocephala cells per minute, and the half-saturation concentration was 3.9 × 102 N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. For T. cucullulus the maximum feeding rate was estimated to be 0.2 N. cryptocephala per minute, and the half-saturation concentration was 5.4 × $ 10^{3} $N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. The data were also fitted using only the number of cells ingested at 60 and 120 min, by converting the endpoint consumption to rates. For O. fallax, the estimated maximum feeding rates were 1.3 and 1.0 N. cryptocephala per minute for 60 and 120 min, respectively, and estimated half-saturation concentrations were 5.1 × $ 10^{2} $ and 3.5 × $ 10^{2} $N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. For T. cucullulus, estimated maximum feeding rates were 0.6 and 0.4 N. cryptocephala per minute for 60 and 120 min, respectively, and estimated half-saturation concentrations were 1.5 × $ 10^{4} $ and 1.1 × 104 N. cryptocephala per square centimeter. These results suggest that kinetic methods for estimating ingestion rates are more accurate than endpoint determinations. Based on field observations of periphyton densities, these ciliates potentially are consuming 4.8% of the total available standing crop of diatom biomass per day and this could represent up to 16% of total available daily primary production.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Logistic Regression</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ingestion Rate</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Functional Response</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Standing Crop</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Navicula</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pratt, J. R.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Microbial ecology</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY : Springer, 1974</subfield><subfield code="g">31(1996), 2 vom: 01. März, Seite 209-224</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)254630197</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1462065-0</subfield><subfield code="x">1432-184X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:31</subfield><subfield code="g">year:1996</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:01</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:209-224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00167866</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_121</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_374</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_381</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_647</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2043</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2116</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2158</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2193</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2808</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2939</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2946</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2949</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2951</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4277</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4346</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4753</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">42.90</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">31</subfield><subfield code="j">1996</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">01</subfield><subfield code="c">03</subfield><subfield code="h">209-224</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.401354 |