Dead in the water: comment on “Development of an aquatic exposure assessment model for imidacloprid in sewage treatment plant discharges arising from use of veterinary medicinal products”

Abstract Anthe et al. (Environ Sci Eur 32:147, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-00424-4) develop a mathematical model to calculate the contribution of veterinary medicinal products (VMPs) to the levels of imidacloprid observed in the UK water monitoring programme. They find that VMPs make on...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Perkins, Rosemary [verfasserIn] Whitehead, Martin [verfasserIn] Goulson, Dave [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2021

Schlagwörter:	Imidacloprid Waterway Pollution Wastewater

Anmerkung:	© The Author(s) 2021

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Umweltwissenschaften und Schadstoff-Forschung - Heidelberg : Springer, 1989, 33(2021), 1 vom: 05. Aug.
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:33 ; year:2021 ; number:1 ; day:05 ; month:08

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.1186/s12302-021-00533-8

Katalog-ID:	SPR044755872

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	SPR044755872
003	DE-627
005	20230519182816.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	210806s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1186/s12302-021-00533-8 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)SPR044755872
035			\|a (SPR)s12302-021-00533-8-e
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 570 \|a 690 \|a 610 \|q ASE
084			\|a 43.13 \|2 bkl
084			\|a 43.12 \|2 bkl
084			\|a 44.13 \|2 bkl
100	1		\|a Perkins, Rosemary \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Dead in the water: comment on “Development of an aquatic exposure assessment model for imidacloprid in sewage treatment plant discharges arising from use of veterinary medicinal products”
264		1	\|c 2021
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
500			\|a © The Author(s) 2021
520			\|a Abstract Anthe et al. (Environ Sci Eur 32:147, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-00424-4) develop a mathematical model to calculate the contribution of veterinary medicinal products (VMPs) to the levels of imidacloprid observed in the UK water monitoring programme. They find that VMPs make only a very small contribution to measured pollution levels, and that the estimated concentrations do not exceed ecotoxicological thresholds. However, shortcomings in methodology—including the implicit assumption that imidacloprid applied to pets is available for release to the environment for 24 h only and failure to incorporate site-specific sewage effluent data relating to measured levels—raise questions about their conclusions. Adjusting for these and other deficiencies, we find that their model appears consistent with the conclusion that emissions from VMPs may greatly exceed ecotoxicological thresholds and contribute substantially to imidacloprid waterway pollution in the UK. However, the model utilises imidacloprid emissions fractions for animals undergoing the different scenarios (for example, bathing) that are extrapolated from unpublished studies that do not clearly resemble the modelled scenarios, with insufficient evidence provided to support their derivation. As a result, we find that the model presented by Anthe et al. provides no reliable conclusions about the contribution of veterinary medicinal products to the levels of imidacloprid in UK waterways.
650		4	\|a Imidacloprid \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Waterway \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Pollution \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Wastewater \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
700	1		\|a Whitehead, Martin \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Goulson, Dave \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Umweltwissenschaften und Schadstoff-Forschung \|d Heidelberg : Springer, 1989 \|g 33(2021), 1 vom: 05. Aug. \|w (DE-627)319337200 \|w (DE-600)2014183-X \|x 1865-5084 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:33 \|g year:2021 \|g number:1 \|g day:05 \|g month:08
856	4	0	\|u https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12302-021-00533-8 \|z kostenfrei \|3 Volltext
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_SPRINGER
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHA
912			\|a SSG-OPC-GGO
912			\|a SSG-OPC-ASE
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2360
936	b	k	\|a 43.13 \|q ASE
936	b	k	\|a 43.12 \|q ASE
936	b	k	\|a 44.13 \|q ASE
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 33 \|j 2021 \|e 1 \|b 05 \|c 08

Indexfelder

author_variant	r p rp m w mw d g dg
matchkey_str	article:18655084:2021----::ednhwtromnodvlpetfnqaiepsrassmnmdloiialpiiswgtetetlndshrea
hierarchy_sort_str	2021
bklnumber	43.13 43.12 44.13
publishDate	2021
allfields	10.1186/s12302-021-00533-8 doi (DE-627)SPR044755872 (SPR)s12302-021-00533-8-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 690 610 ASE 43.13 bkl 43.12 bkl 44.13 bkl Perkins, Rosemary verfasserin aut Dead in the water: comment on “Development of an aquatic exposure assessment model for imidacloprid in sewage treatment plant discharges arising from use of veterinary medicinal products” 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Anthe et al. (Environ Sci Eur 32:147, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-00424-4) develop a mathematical model to calculate the contribution of veterinary medicinal products (VMPs) to the levels of imidacloprid observed in the UK water monitoring programme. They find that VMPs make only a very small contribution to measured pollution levels, and that the estimated concentrations do not exceed ecotoxicological thresholds. However, shortcomings in methodology—including the implicit assumption that imidacloprid applied to pets is available for release to the environment for 24 h only and failure to incorporate site-specific sewage effluent data relating to measured levels—raise questions about their conclusions. Adjusting for these and other deficiencies, we find that their model appears consistent with the conclusion that emissions from VMPs may greatly exceed ecotoxicological thresholds and contribute substantially to imidacloprid waterway pollution in the UK. However, the model utilises imidacloprid emissions fractions for animals undergoing the different scenarios (for example, bathing) that are extrapolated from unpublished studies that do not clearly resemble the modelled scenarios, with insufficient evidence provided to support their derivation. As a result, we find that the model presented by Anthe et al. provides no reliable conclusions about the contribution of veterinary medicinal products to the levels of imidacloprid in UK waterways. Imidacloprid (dpeaa)DE-He213 Waterway (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pollution (dpeaa)DE-He213 Wastewater (dpeaa)DE-He213 Whitehead, Martin verfasserin aut Goulson, Dave verfasserin aut Enthalten in Umweltwissenschaften und Schadstoff-Forschung Heidelberg : Springer, 1989 33(2021), 1 vom: 05. Aug. (DE-627)319337200 (DE-600)2014183-X 1865-5084 nnns volume:33 year:2021 number:1 day:05 month:08 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12302-021-00533-8 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-GGO SSG-OPC-ASE GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_2360 43.13 ASE 43.12 ASE 44.13 ASE AR 33 2021 1 05 08
spelling	10.1186/s12302-021-00533-8 doi (DE-627)SPR044755872 (SPR)s12302-021-00533-8-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 690 610 ASE 43.13 bkl 43.12 bkl 44.13 bkl Perkins, Rosemary verfasserin aut Dead in the water: comment on “Development of an aquatic exposure assessment model for imidacloprid in sewage treatment plant discharges arising from use of veterinary medicinal products” 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Anthe et al. (Environ Sci Eur 32:147, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-00424-4) develop a mathematical model to calculate the contribution of veterinary medicinal products (VMPs) to the levels of imidacloprid observed in the UK water monitoring programme. They find that VMPs make only a very small contribution to measured pollution levels, and that the estimated concentrations do not exceed ecotoxicological thresholds. However, shortcomings in methodology—including the implicit assumption that imidacloprid applied to pets is available for release to the environment for 24 h only and failure to incorporate site-specific sewage effluent data relating to measured levels—raise questions about their conclusions. Adjusting for these and other deficiencies, we find that their model appears consistent with the conclusion that emissions from VMPs may greatly exceed ecotoxicological thresholds and contribute substantially to imidacloprid waterway pollution in the UK. However, the model utilises imidacloprid emissions fractions for animals undergoing the different scenarios (for example, bathing) that are extrapolated from unpublished studies that do not clearly resemble the modelled scenarios, with insufficient evidence provided to support their derivation. As a result, we find that the model presented by Anthe et al. provides no reliable conclusions about the contribution of veterinary medicinal products to the levels of imidacloprid in UK waterways. Imidacloprid (dpeaa)DE-He213 Waterway (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pollution (dpeaa)DE-He213 Wastewater (dpeaa)DE-He213 Whitehead, Martin verfasserin aut Goulson, Dave verfasserin aut Enthalten in Umweltwissenschaften und Schadstoff-Forschung Heidelberg : Springer, 1989 33(2021), 1 vom: 05. Aug. (DE-627)319337200 (DE-600)2014183-X 1865-5084 nnns volume:33 year:2021 number:1 day:05 month:08 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12302-021-00533-8 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-GGO SSG-OPC-ASE GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_2360 43.13 ASE 43.12 ASE 44.13 ASE AR 33 2021 1 05 08
allfields_unstemmed	10.1186/s12302-021-00533-8 doi (DE-627)SPR044755872 (SPR)s12302-021-00533-8-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 690 610 ASE 43.13 bkl 43.12 bkl 44.13 bkl Perkins, Rosemary verfasserin aut Dead in the water: comment on “Development of an aquatic exposure assessment model for imidacloprid in sewage treatment plant discharges arising from use of veterinary medicinal products” 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Anthe et al. (Environ Sci Eur 32:147, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-00424-4) develop a mathematical model to calculate the contribution of veterinary medicinal products (VMPs) to the levels of imidacloprid observed in the UK water monitoring programme. They find that VMPs make only a very small contribution to measured pollution levels, and that the estimated concentrations do not exceed ecotoxicological thresholds. However, shortcomings in methodology—including the implicit assumption that imidacloprid applied to pets is available for release to the environment for 24 h only and failure to incorporate site-specific sewage effluent data relating to measured levels—raise questions about their conclusions. Adjusting for these and other deficiencies, we find that their model appears consistent with the conclusion that emissions from VMPs may greatly exceed ecotoxicological thresholds and contribute substantially to imidacloprid waterway pollution in the UK. However, the model utilises imidacloprid emissions fractions for animals undergoing the different scenarios (for example, bathing) that are extrapolated from unpublished studies that do not clearly resemble the modelled scenarios, with insufficient evidence provided to support their derivation. As a result, we find that the model presented by Anthe et al. provides no reliable conclusions about the contribution of veterinary medicinal products to the levels of imidacloprid in UK waterways. Imidacloprid (dpeaa)DE-He213 Waterway (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pollution (dpeaa)DE-He213 Wastewater (dpeaa)DE-He213 Whitehead, Martin verfasserin aut Goulson, Dave verfasserin aut Enthalten in Umweltwissenschaften und Schadstoff-Forschung Heidelberg : Springer, 1989 33(2021), 1 vom: 05. Aug. (DE-627)319337200 (DE-600)2014183-X 1865-5084 nnns volume:33 year:2021 number:1 day:05 month:08 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12302-021-00533-8 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-GGO SSG-OPC-ASE GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_2360 43.13 ASE 43.12 ASE 44.13 ASE AR 33 2021 1 05 08
allfieldsGer	10.1186/s12302-021-00533-8 doi (DE-627)SPR044755872 (SPR)s12302-021-00533-8-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 690 610 ASE 43.13 bkl 43.12 bkl 44.13 bkl Perkins, Rosemary verfasserin aut Dead in the water: comment on “Development of an aquatic exposure assessment model for imidacloprid in sewage treatment plant discharges arising from use of veterinary medicinal products” 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Anthe et al. (Environ Sci Eur 32:147, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-00424-4) develop a mathematical model to calculate the contribution of veterinary medicinal products (VMPs) to the levels of imidacloprid observed in the UK water monitoring programme. They find that VMPs make only a very small contribution to measured pollution levels, and that the estimated concentrations do not exceed ecotoxicological thresholds. However, shortcomings in methodology—including the implicit assumption that imidacloprid applied to pets is available for release to the environment for 24 h only and failure to incorporate site-specific sewage effluent data relating to measured levels—raise questions about their conclusions. Adjusting for these and other deficiencies, we find that their model appears consistent with the conclusion that emissions from VMPs may greatly exceed ecotoxicological thresholds and contribute substantially to imidacloprid waterway pollution in the UK. However, the model utilises imidacloprid emissions fractions for animals undergoing the different scenarios (for example, bathing) that are extrapolated from unpublished studies that do not clearly resemble the modelled scenarios, with insufficient evidence provided to support their derivation. As a result, we find that the model presented by Anthe et al. provides no reliable conclusions about the contribution of veterinary medicinal products to the levels of imidacloprid in UK waterways. Imidacloprid (dpeaa)DE-He213 Waterway (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pollution (dpeaa)DE-He213 Wastewater (dpeaa)DE-He213 Whitehead, Martin verfasserin aut Goulson, Dave verfasserin aut Enthalten in Umweltwissenschaften und Schadstoff-Forschung Heidelberg : Springer, 1989 33(2021), 1 vom: 05. Aug. (DE-627)319337200 (DE-600)2014183-X 1865-5084 nnns volume:33 year:2021 number:1 day:05 month:08 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12302-021-00533-8 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-GGO SSG-OPC-ASE GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_2360 43.13 ASE 43.12 ASE 44.13 ASE AR 33 2021 1 05 08
allfieldsSound	10.1186/s12302-021-00533-8 doi (DE-627)SPR044755872 (SPR)s12302-021-00533-8-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 690 610 ASE 43.13 bkl 43.12 bkl 44.13 bkl Perkins, Rosemary verfasserin aut Dead in the water: comment on “Development of an aquatic exposure assessment model for imidacloprid in sewage treatment plant discharges arising from use of veterinary medicinal products” 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Anthe et al. (Environ Sci Eur 32:147, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-00424-4) develop a mathematical model to calculate the contribution of veterinary medicinal products (VMPs) to the levels of imidacloprid observed in the UK water monitoring programme. They find that VMPs make only a very small contribution to measured pollution levels, and that the estimated concentrations do not exceed ecotoxicological thresholds. However, shortcomings in methodology—including the implicit assumption that imidacloprid applied to pets is available for release to the environment for 24 h only and failure to incorporate site-specific sewage effluent data relating to measured levels—raise questions about their conclusions. Adjusting for these and other deficiencies, we find that their model appears consistent with the conclusion that emissions from VMPs may greatly exceed ecotoxicological thresholds and contribute substantially to imidacloprid waterway pollution in the UK. However, the model utilises imidacloprid emissions fractions for animals undergoing the different scenarios (for example, bathing) that are extrapolated from unpublished studies that do not clearly resemble the modelled scenarios, with insufficient evidence provided to support their derivation. As a result, we find that the model presented by Anthe et al. provides no reliable conclusions about the contribution of veterinary medicinal products to the levels of imidacloprid in UK waterways. Imidacloprid (dpeaa)DE-He213 Waterway (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pollution (dpeaa)DE-He213 Wastewater (dpeaa)DE-He213 Whitehead, Martin verfasserin aut Goulson, Dave verfasserin aut Enthalten in Umweltwissenschaften und Schadstoff-Forschung Heidelberg : Springer, 1989 33(2021), 1 vom: 05. Aug. (DE-627)319337200 (DE-600)2014183-X 1865-5084 nnns volume:33 year:2021 number:1 day:05 month:08 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12302-021-00533-8 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-GGO SSG-OPC-ASE GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_2360 43.13 ASE 43.12 ASE 44.13 ASE AR 33 2021 1 05 08
language	English
source	Enthalten in Umweltwissenschaften und Schadstoff-Forschung 33(2021), 1 vom: 05. Aug. volume:33 year:2021 number:1 day:05 month:08
sourceStr	Enthalten in Umweltwissenschaften und Schadstoff-Forschung 33(2021), 1 vom: 05. Aug. volume:33 year:2021 number:1 day:05 month:08
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Imidacloprid Waterway Pollution Wastewater
dewey-raw	570
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Umweltwissenschaften und Schadstoff-Forschung
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Perkins, Rosemary @@aut@@ Whitehead, Martin @@aut@@ Goulson, Dave @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2021-08-05T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	319337200
dewey-sort	3570
id	SPR044755872
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR044755872</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519182816.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210806s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/s12302-021-00533-8</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR044755872</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s12302-021-00533-8-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">43.13</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">43.12</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.13</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Perkins, Rosemary</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Dead in the water: comment on “Development of an aquatic exposure assessment model for imidacloprid in sewage treatment plant discharges arising from use of veterinary medicinal products”</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Anthe et al. (Environ Sci Eur 32:147, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-00424-4) develop a mathematical model to calculate the contribution of veterinary medicinal products (VMPs) to the levels of imidacloprid observed in the UK water monitoring programme. They find that VMPs make only a very small contribution to measured pollution levels, and that the estimated concentrations do not exceed ecotoxicological thresholds. However, shortcomings in methodology—including the implicit assumption that imidacloprid applied to pets is available for release to the environment for 24 h only and failure to incorporate site-specific sewage effluent data relating to measured levels—raise questions about their conclusions. Adjusting for these and other deficiencies, we find that their model appears consistent with the conclusion that emissions from VMPs may greatly exceed ecotoxicological thresholds and contribute substantially to imidacloprid waterway pollution in the UK. However, the model utilises imidacloprid emissions fractions for animals undergoing the different scenarios (for example, bathing) that are extrapolated from unpublished studies that do not clearly resemble the modelled scenarios, with insufficient evidence provided to support their derivation. As a result, we find that the model presented by Anthe et al. provides no reliable conclusions about the contribution of veterinary medicinal products to the levels of imidacloprid in UK waterways.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Imidacloprid</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Waterway</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pollution</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Wastewater</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Whitehead, Martin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Goulson, Dave</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Umweltwissenschaften und Schadstoff-Forschung</subfield><subfield code="d">Heidelberg : Springer, 1989</subfield><subfield code="g">33(2021), 1 vom: 05. Aug.</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)319337200</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2014183-X</subfield><subfield code="x">1865-5084</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:33</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:05</subfield><subfield code="g">month:08</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12302-021-00533-8</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2360</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">43.13</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">43.12</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.13</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">33</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">05</subfield><subfield code="c">08</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Perkins, Rosemary
spellingShingle	Perkins, Rosemary ddc 570 bkl 43.13 bkl 43.12 bkl 44.13 misc Imidacloprid misc Waterway misc Pollution misc Wastewater Dead in the water: comment on “Development of an aquatic exposure assessment model for imidacloprid in sewage treatment plant discharges arising from use of veterinary medicinal products”
authorStr	Perkins, Rosemary
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)319337200
format	electronic Article
dewey-ones	570 - Life sciences; biology 690 - Buildings 610 - Medicine & health
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut
collection	springer
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	1865-5084
topic_title	570 690 610 ASE 43.13 bkl 43.12 bkl 44.13 bkl Dead in the water: comment on “Development of an aquatic exposure assessment model for imidacloprid in sewage treatment plant discharges arising from use of veterinary medicinal products” Imidacloprid (dpeaa)DE-He213 Waterway (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pollution (dpeaa)DE-He213 Wastewater (dpeaa)DE-He213
topic	ddc 570 bkl 43.13 bkl 43.12 bkl 44.13 misc Imidacloprid misc Waterway misc Pollution misc Wastewater
topic_unstemmed	ddc 570 bkl 43.13 bkl 43.12 bkl 44.13 misc Imidacloprid misc Waterway misc Pollution misc Wastewater
topic_browse	ddc 570 bkl 43.13 bkl 43.12 bkl 44.13 misc Imidacloprid misc Waterway misc Pollution misc Wastewater
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Umweltwissenschaften und Schadstoff-Forschung
hierarchy_parent_id	319337200
dewey-tens	570 - Life sciences; biology 690 - Building & construction 610 - Medicine & health
hierarchy_top_title	Umweltwissenschaften und Schadstoff-Forschung
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)319337200 (DE-600)2014183-X
title	Dead in the water: comment on “Development of an aquatic exposure assessment model for imidacloprid in sewage treatment plant discharges arising from use of veterinary medicinal products”
ctrlnum	(DE-627)SPR044755872 (SPR)s12302-021-00533-8-e
title_full	Dead in the water: comment on “Development of an aquatic exposure assessment model for imidacloprid in sewage treatment plant discharges arising from use of veterinary medicinal products”
author_sort	Perkins, Rosemary
journal	Umweltwissenschaften und Schadstoff-Forschung
journalStr	Umweltwissenschaften und Schadstoff-Forschung
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
dewey-hundreds	500 - Science 600 - Technology
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2021
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Perkins, Rosemary Whitehead, Martin Goulson, Dave
container_volume	33
class	570 690 610 ASE 43.13 bkl 43.12 bkl 44.13 bkl
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Perkins, Rosemary
doi_str_mv	10.1186/s12302-021-00533-8
dewey-full	570 690 610
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	dead in the water: comment on “development of an aquatic exposure assessment model for imidacloprid in sewage treatment plant discharges arising from use of veterinary medicinal products”
title_auth	Dead in the water: comment on “Development of an aquatic exposure assessment model for imidacloprid in sewage treatment plant discharges arising from use of veterinary medicinal products”
abstract	Abstract Anthe et al. (Environ Sci Eur 32:147, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-00424-4) develop a mathematical model to calculate the contribution of veterinary medicinal products (VMPs) to the levels of imidacloprid observed in the UK water monitoring programme. They find that VMPs make only a very small contribution to measured pollution levels, and that the estimated concentrations do not exceed ecotoxicological thresholds. However, shortcomings in methodology—including the implicit assumption that imidacloprid applied to pets is available for release to the environment for 24 h only and failure to incorporate site-specific sewage effluent data relating to measured levels—raise questions about their conclusions. Adjusting for these and other deficiencies, we find that their model appears consistent with the conclusion that emissions from VMPs may greatly exceed ecotoxicological thresholds and contribute substantially to imidacloprid waterway pollution in the UK. However, the model utilises imidacloprid emissions fractions for animals undergoing the different scenarios (for example, bathing) that are extrapolated from unpublished studies that do not clearly resemble the modelled scenarios, with insufficient evidence provided to support their derivation. As a result, we find that the model presented by Anthe et al. provides no reliable conclusions about the contribution of veterinary medicinal products to the levels of imidacloprid in UK waterways. © The Author(s) 2021
abstractGer	Abstract Anthe et al. (Environ Sci Eur 32:147, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-00424-4) develop a mathematical model to calculate the contribution of veterinary medicinal products (VMPs) to the levels of imidacloprid observed in the UK water monitoring programme. They find that VMPs make only a very small contribution to measured pollution levels, and that the estimated concentrations do not exceed ecotoxicological thresholds. However, shortcomings in methodology—including the implicit assumption that imidacloprid applied to pets is available for release to the environment for 24 h only and failure to incorporate site-specific sewage effluent data relating to measured levels—raise questions about their conclusions. Adjusting for these and other deficiencies, we find that their model appears consistent with the conclusion that emissions from VMPs may greatly exceed ecotoxicological thresholds and contribute substantially to imidacloprid waterway pollution in the UK. However, the model utilises imidacloprid emissions fractions for animals undergoing the different scenarios (for example, bathing) that are extrapolated from unpublished studies that do not clearly resemble the modelled scenarios, with insufficient evidence provided to support their derivation. As a result, we find that the model presented by Anthe et al. provides no reliable conclusions about the contribution of veterinary medicinal products to the levels of imidacloprid in UK waterways. © The Author(s) 2021
abstract_unstemmed	Abstract Anthe et al. (Environ Sci Eur 32:147, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-00424-4) develop a mathematical model to calculate the contribution of veterinary medicinal products (VMPs) to the levels of imidacloprid observed in the UK water monitoring programme. They find that VMPs make only a very small contribution to measured pollution levels, and that the estimated concentrations do not exceed ecotoxicological thresholds. However, shortcomings in methodology—including the implicit assumption that imidacloprid applied to pets is available for release to the environment for 24 h only and failure to incorporate site-specific sewage effluent data relating to measured levels—raise questions about their conclusions. Adjusting for these and other deficiencies, we find that their model appears consistent with the conclusion that emissions from VMPs may greatly exceed ecotoxicological thresholds and contribute substantially to imidacloprid waterway pollution in the UK. However, the model utilises imidacloprid emissions fractions for animals undergoing the different scenarios (for example, bathing) that are extrapolated from unpublished studies that do not clearly resemble the modelled scenarios, with insufficient evidence provided to support their derivation. As a result, we find that the model presented by Anthe et al. provides no reliable conclusions about the contribution of veterinary medicinal products to the levels of imidacloprid in UK waterways. © The Author(s) 2021
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-GGO SSG-OPC-ASE GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_2360
container_issue	1
title_short	Dead in the water: comment on “Development of an aquatic exposure assessment model for imidacloprid in sewage treatment plant discharges arising from use of veterinary medicinal products”
url	https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12302-021-00533-8
remote_bool	true
author2	Whitehead, Martin Goulson, Dave
author2Str	Whitehead, Martin Goulson, Dave
ppnlink	319337200
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1186/s12302-021-00533-8
up_date	2024-07-04T02:12:26.470Z
_version_	1803612739569975296
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR044755872</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230519182816.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210806s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/s12302-021-00533-8</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR044755872</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s12302-021-00533-8-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">43.13</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">43.12</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.13</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Perkins, Rosemary</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Dead in the water: comment on “Development of an aquatic exposure assessment model for imidacloprid in sewage treatment plant discharges arising from use of veterinary medicinal products”</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Anthe et al. (Environ Sci Eur 32:147, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-00424-4) develop a mathematical model to calculate the contribution of veterinary medicinal products (VMPs) to the levels of imidacloprid observed in the UK water monitoring programme. They find that VMPs make only a very small contribution to measured pollution levels, and that the estimated concentrations do not exceed ecotoxicological thresholds. However, shortcomings in methodology—including the implicit assumption that imidacloprid applied to pets is available for release to the environment for 24 h only and failure to incorporate site-specific sewage effluent data relating to measured levels—raise questions about their conclusions. Adjusting for these and other deficiencies, we find that their model appears consistent with the conclusion that emissions from VMPs may greatly exceed ecotoxicological thresholds and contribute substantially to imidacloprid waterway pollution in the UK. However, the model utilises imidacloprid emissions fractions for animals undergoing the different scenarios (for example, bathing) that are extrapolated from unpublished studies that do not clearly resemble the modelled scenarios, with insufficient evidence provided to support their derivation. As a result, we find that the model presented by Anthe et al. provides no reliable conclusions about the contribution of veterinary medicinal products to the levels of imidacloprid in UK waterways.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Imidacloprid</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Waterway</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pollution</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Wastewater</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Whitehead, Martin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Goulson, Dave</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Umweltwissenschaften und Schadstoff-Forschung</subfield><subfield code="d">Heidelberg : Springer, 1989</subfield><subfield code="g">33(2021), 1 vom: 05. Aug.</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)319337200</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2014183-X</subfield><subfield code="x">1865-5084</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:33</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:05</subfield><subfield code="g">month:08</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12302-021-00533-8</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GGO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2360</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">43.13</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">43.12</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.13</subfield><subfield code="q">ASE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">33</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">05</subfield><subfield code="c">08</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.3998833

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Dead in the water: comment on “Development of an aquatic exposure assessment model for imidacloprid in sewage treatment plant discharges arising from use of veterinary medicinal products”

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?