Measuring raw-material criticality of product systems through an economic product importance indicator: a case study of battery-electric vehicles

Purpose The concept of criticality concerns the probability and the possible impacts of shortages in raw-material supply and is usually applied to regional economies or specific industries. With more and more products being highly dependent on potentially critical raw materials, efforts are being ma...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Purpose The concept of criticality concerns the probability and the possible impacts of shortages in raw-material supply and is usually applied to regional economies or specific industries. With more and more products being highly dependent on potentially critical raw materials, efforts are being made to also incorporate criticality into the framework of life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA). However, there is still some need for methodological development of indicators to measure raw-material criticality in LCSA. Methods We therefore introduce ‘economic product importance’ (EPI) as a novel parameter for the product-specific evaluation of the relevance and significance of a certain raw material for a particular product system. We thereby consider both the actual raw-material flows (life cycle inventories) and the life cycle cost. The EPI thus represents a measure for the material-specific product-system vulnerability (another component being the substitutability). Combining the product-system vulnerability of a specific product system towards a certain raw material with the supply disruption probability of that same raw material then yields the product-system specific overall criticality with regard to that raw material. In order to demonstrate our novel approach, we apply it to a case study on a battery-electric vehicle. Results Since our approach accounts for the actual amounts of raw materials used in a product and relates their total share of costs to the overall costs of the product, no under- or over-estimation of the mere presence of the raw materials with respect to their relevance for the product system occurs. Consequently, raw materials, e.g. rare earth elements, which are regularly rated highly critical, do not necessarily reach higher criticality ranks within our approach, if they are either needed in very small amounts only or if their share in total costs of the respective product system is very low. Accordingly, in our case study on a battery-electric vehicle product system, most rare earth elements are ranked less critical than bulk materials such as copper or aluminium. Conclusion Our EPI approach constitutes a step forward towards a methodology for the raw-material criticality assessment within the LCSA framework, mainly because it allows a product-specific evaluation of product-system vulnerability. Furthermore, it is compatible with common methods for the supply disruption probability calculation — such as GeoPolRisk, ESP or ESSENZ — as well as with available substitutability evaluations. The practicability and usefulness of our approach has been shown by applying it to a battery-electric vehicle. Ausführliche Beschreibung

Autor*in:	Lütkehaus, Hauke [verfasserIn] Pade, Christian Oswald, Matthias Brand, Urte Naegler, Tobias Vogt, Thomas

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2021

Schlagwörter:	Raw-material criticality Resource criticality Critical materials Critical resources Life cycle assessment, LCA Life cycle sustainability assessment, LCSA Substitutability Battery electric vehicle, BEV

Anmerkung:	© The Author(s) 2021

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: The international journal of life cycle assessment - Berlin : Springer, 1996, 27(2021), 1 vom: 04. Dez., Seite 122-137
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:27 ; year:2021 ; number:1 ; day:04 ; month:12 ; pages:122-137

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.1007/s11367-021-02002-z

Katalog-ID:	SPR045996490