Needs for re-intervention on restored teeth in adults: a practice-based study
Objectives Evaluate the need for re-intervention on dental coronal restorations in adults seen in a network of general dental practitioners (ReCOL). Materials and methods This observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study involved 40 practitioners and 400 patients. Coronal restoration failures (...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Decup, Franck [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Clinical Oral Investigations - Springer-Verlag, 2001, 26(2021), 1 vom: 24. Juli, Seite 789-801 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:26 ; year:2021 ; number:1 ; day:24 ; month:07 ; pages:789-801 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s00784-021-04058-5 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR046064133 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR046064133 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230507092304.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220127s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00784-021-04058-5 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR046064133 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)s00784-021-04058-5-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Decup, Franck |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Needs for re-intervention on restored teeth in adults: a practice-based study |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 | ||
| 520 | |a Objectives Evaluate the need for re-intervention on dental coronal restorations in adults seen in a network of general dental practitioners (ReCOL). Materials and methods This observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study involved 40 practitioners and 400 patients. Coronal restoration failures (needing re-intervention for unsatisfactory outcomes) were assessed with a simplified rating scale of seven criteria from the FDI World Dental Federation. The oral health status, the risk factors, and Oral Health Impact Profile-14 were also examined. Previous restoration characteristics (extent, technique, material) were analyzed according to the need for re-intervention (yes/no), the age group, and the risk profile. Qualitative variables were compared between “re-intervention” and “no re-intervention” group using Fisher exact test. Results The need for re-intervention was estimated at 74% (95% CI: 70; 79); it increased with age (49 to 90%), unfavorable risk profile (82 vs. 62%), and extent of the filling (32, 39, 44, and 44% on 1, 2, 3 surfaces, and crowns, respectively). More posterior than anterior teeth were restored (median per patient: 6 vs. 1) or needed re-intervention (median per patient: 1 vs. 0). Conclusions The needs for re-intervention in adults are still high within a context of ever-changing materials and techniques, simplified and rationalized decision-makings, and demands for patient involvement. Clinical relevance Meeting these needs requires the following: (i) consensus definitions and assessment methods for “failure” and (ii) reliable feedbacks on materials, procedures, and satisfaction. Building large and detailed databases fed by networks of motivated practitioners will help analyzing complex success/failure data by artificial intelligence and guiding treatment and research. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Community care network |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Cross-sectional study |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Dental restoration failure |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Patient satisfaction |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Private practice; Risk factor |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dantony, Emmanuelle |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chevalier, Charlène |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a David, Alexandra |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Garyga, Valentin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tohmé, Marie |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gueyffier, François |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nony, Patrice |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Maucort-Boulch, Delphine |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Grosgogeat, Brigitte |0 (orcid)0000-0003-2194-7300 |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Clinical Oral Investigations |d Springer-Verlag, 2001 |g 26(2021), 1 vom: 24. Juli, Seite 789-801 |w (DE-627)SPR007794231 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:26 |g year:2021 |g number:1 |g day:24 |g month:07 |g pages:789-801 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04058-5 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 26 |j 2021 |e 1 |b 24 |c 07 |h 789-801 | ||
| author_variant |
f d fd e d ed c c cc a d ad v g vg m t mt f g fg p n pn d m b dmb b g bg |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
decupfranckdantonyemmanuellechevaliercha:2021----:edfrenevninnetrdetiautar |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2021 |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s00784-021-04058-5 doi (DE-627)SPR046064133 (SPR)s00784-021-04058-5-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Decup, Franck verfasserin aut Needs for re-intervention on restored teeth in adults: a practice-based study 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 Objectives Evaluate the need for re-intervention on dental coronal restorations in adults seen in a network of general dental practitioners (ReCOL). Materials and methods This observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study involved 40 practitioners and 400 patients. Coronal restoration failures (needing re-intervention for unsatisfactory outcomes) were assessed with a simplified rating scale of seven criteria from the FDI World Dental Federation. The oral health status, the risk factors, and Oral Health Impact Profile-14 were also examined. Previous restoration characteristics (extent, technique, material) were analyzed according to the need for re-intervention (yes/no), the age group, and the risk profile. Qualitative variables were compared between “re-intervention” and “no re-intervention” group using Fisher exact test. Results The need for re-intervention was estimated at 74% (95% CI: 70; 79); it increased with age (49 to 90%), unfavorable risk profile (82 vs. 62%), and extent of the filling (32, 39, 44, and 44% on 1, 2, 3 surfaces, and crowns, respectively). More posterior than anterior teeth were restored (median per patient: 6 vs. 1) or needed re-intervention (median per patient: 1 vs. 0). Conclusions The needs for re-intervention in adults are still high within a context of ever-changing materials and techniques, simplified and rationalized decision-makings, and demands for patient involvement. Clinical relevance Meeting these needs requires the following: (i) consensus definitions and assessment methods for “failure” and (ii) reliable feedbacks on materials, procedures, and satisfaction. Building large and detailed databases fed by networks of motivated practitioners will help analyzing complex success/failure data by artificial intelligence and guiding treatment and research. Community care network (dpeaa)DE-He213 Cross-sectional study (dpeaa)DE-He213 Dental restoration failure (dpeaa)DE-He213 Patient satisfaction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Private practice; Risk factor (dpeaa)DE-He213 Dantony, Emmanuelle aut Chevalier, Charlène aut David, Alexandra aut Garyga, Valentin aut Tohmé, Marie aut Gueyffier, François aut Nony, Patrice aut Maucort-Boulch, Delphine aut Grosgogeat, Brigitte (orcid)0000-0003-2194-7300 aut Enthalten in Clinical Oral Investigations Springer-Verlag, 2001 26(2021), 1 vom: 24. Juli, Seite 789-801 (DE-627)SPR007794231 nnns volume:26 year:2021 number:1 day:24 month:07 pages:789-801 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04058-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 26 2021 1 24 07 789-801 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s00784-021-04058-5 doi (DE-627)SPR046064133 (SPR)s00784-021-04058-5-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Decup, Franck verfasserin aut Needs for re-intervention on restored teeth in adults: a practice-based study 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 Objectives Evaluate the need for re-intervention on dental coronal restorations in adults seen in a network of general dental practitioners (ReCOL). Materials and methods This observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study involved 40 practitioners and 400 patients. Coronal restoration failures (needing re-intervention for unsatisfactory outcomes) were assessed with a simplified rating scale of seven criteria from the FDI World Dental Federation. The oral health status, the risk factors, and Oral Health Impact Profile-14 were also examined. Previous restoration characteristics (extent, technique, material) were analyzed according to the need for re-intervention (yes/no), the age group, and the risk profile. Qualitative variables were compared between “re-intervention” and “no re-intervention” group using Fisher exact test. Results The need for re-intervention was estimated at 74% (95% CI: 70; 79); it increased with age (49 to 90%), unfavorable risk profile (82 vs. 62%), and extent of the filling (32, 39, 44, and 44% on 1, 2, 3 surfaces, and crowns, respectively). More posterior than anterior teeth were restored (median per patient: 6 vs. 1) or needed re-intervention (median per patient: 1 vs. 0). Conclusions The needs for re-intervention in adults are still high within a context of ever-changing materials and techniques, simplified and rationalized decision-makings, and demands for patient involvement. Clinical relevance Meeting these needs requires the following: (i) consensus definitions and assessment methods for “failure” and (ii) reliable feedbacks on materials, procedures, and satisfaction. Building large and detailed databases fed by networks of motivated practitioners will help analyzing complex success/failure data by artificial intelligence and guiding treatment and research. Community care network (dpeaa)DE-He213 Cross-sectional study (dpeaa)DE-He213 Dental restoration failure (dpeaa)DE-He213 Patient satisfaction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Private practice; Risk factor (dpeaa)DE-He213 Dantony, Emmanuelle aut Chevalier, Charlène aut David, Alexandra aut Garyga, Valentin aut Tohmé, Marie aut Gueyffier, François aut Nony, Patrice aut Maucort-Boulch, Delphine aut Grosgogeat, Brigitte (orcid)0000-0003-2194-7300 aut Enthalten in Clinical Oral Investigations Springer-Verlag, 2001 26(2021), 1 vom: 24. Juli, Seite 789-801 (DE-627)SPR007794231 nnns volume:26 year:2021 number:1 day:24 month:07 pages:789-801 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04058-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 26 2021 1 24 07 789-801 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s00784-021-04058-5 doi (DE-627)SPR046064133 (SPR)s00784-021-04058-5-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Decup, Franck verfasserin aut Needs for re-intervention on restored teeth in adults: a practice-based study 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 Objectives Evaluate the need for re-intervention on dental coronal restorations in adults seen in a network of general dental practitioners (ReCOL). Materials and methods This observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study involved 40 practitioners and 400 patients. Coronal restoration failures (needing re-intervention for unsatisfactory outcomes) were assessed with a simplified rating scale of seven criteria from the FDI World Dental Federation. The oral health status, the risk factors, and Oral Health Impact Profile-14 were also examined. Previous restoration characteristics (extent, technique, material) were analyzed according to the need for re-intervention (yes/no), the age group, and the risk profile. Qualitative variables were compared between “re-intervention” and “no re-intervention” group using Fisher exact test. Results The need for re-intervention was estimated at 74% (95% CI: 70; 79); it increased with age (49 to 90%), unfavorable risk profile (82 vs. 62%), and extent of the filling (32, 39, 44, and 44% on 1, 2, 3 surfaces, and crowns, respectively). More posterior than anterior teeth were restored (median per patient: 6 vs. 1) or needed re-intervention (median per patient: 1 vs. 0). Conclusions The needs for re-intervention in adults are still high within a context of ever-changing materials and techniques, simplified and rationalized decision-makings, and demands for patient involvement. Clinical relevance Meeting these needs requires the following: (i) consensus definitions and assessment methods for “failure” and (ii) reliable feedbacks on materials, procedures, and satisfaction. Building large and detailed databases fed by networks of motivated practitioners will help analyzing complex success/failure data by artificial intelligence and guiding treatment and research. Community care network (dpeaa)DE-He213 Cross-sectional study (dpeaa)DE-He213 Dental restoration failure (dpeaa)DE-He213 Patient satisfaction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Private practice; Risk factor (dpeaa)DE-He213 Dantony, Emmanuelle aut Chevalier, Charlène aut David, Alexandra aut Garyga, Valentin aut Tohmé, Marie aut Gueyffier, François aut Nony, Patrice aut Maucort-Boulch, Delphine aut Grosgogeat, Brigitte (orcid)0000-0003-2194-7300 aut Enthalten in Clinical Oral Investigations Springer-Verlag, 2001 26(2021), 1 vom: 24. Juli, Seite 789-801 (DE-627)SPR007794231 nnns volume:26 year:2021 number:1 day:24 month:07 pages:789-801 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04058-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 26 2021 1 24 07 789-801 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s00784-021-04058-5 doi (DE-627)SPR046064133 (SPR)s00784-021-04058-5-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Decup, Franck verfasserin aut Needs for re-intervention on restored teeth in adults: a practice-based study 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 Objectives Evaluate the need for re-intervention on dental coronal restorations in adults seen in a network of general dental practitioners (ReCOL). Materials and methods This observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study involved 40 practitioners and 400 patients. Coronal restoration failures (needing re-intervention for unsatisfactory outcomes) were assessed with a simplified rating scale of seven criteria from the FDI World Dental Federation. The oral health status, the risk factors, and Oral Health Impact Profile-14 were also examined. Previous restoration characteristics (extent, technique, material) were analyzed according to the need for re-intervention (yes/no), the age group, and the risk profile. Qualitative variables were compared between “re-intervention” and “no re-intervention” group using Fisher exact test. Results The need for re-intervention was estimated at 74% (95% CI: 70; 79); it increased with age (49 to 90%), unfavorable risk profile (82 vs. 62%), and extent of the filling (32, 39, 44, and 44% on 1, 2, 3 surfaces, and crowns, respectively). More posterior than anterior teeth were restored (median per patient: 6 vs. 1) or needed re-intervention (median per patient: 1 vs. 0). Conclusions The needs for re-intervention in adults are still high within a context of ever-changing materials and techniques, simplified and rationalized decision-makings, and demands for patient involvement. Clinical relevance Meeting these needs requires the following: (i) consensus definitions and assessment methods for “failure” and (ii) reliable feedbacks on materials, procedures, and satisfaction. Building large and detailed databases fed by networks of motivated practitioners will help analyzing complex success/failure data by artificial intelligence and guiding treatment and research. Community care network (dpeaa)DE-He213 Cross-sectional study (dpeaa)DE-He213 Dental restoration failure (dpeaa)DE-He213 Patient satisfaction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Private practice; Risk factor (dpeaa)DE-He213 Dantony, Emmanuelle aut Chevalier, Charlène aut David, Alexandra aut Garyga, Valentin aut Tohmé, Marie aut Gueyffier, François aut Nony, Patrice aut Maucort-Boulch, Delphine aut Grosgogeat, Brigitte (orcid)0000-0003-2194-7300 aut Enthalten in Clinical Oral Investigations Springer-Verlag, 2001 26(2021), 1 vom: 24. Juli, Seite 789-801 (DE-627)SPR007794231 nnns volume:26 year:2021 number:1 day:24 month:07 pages:789-801 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04058-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 26 2021 1 24 07 789-801 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s00784-021-04058-5 doi (DE-627)SPR046064133 (SPR)s00784-021-04058-5-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Decup, Franck verfasserin aut Needs for re-intervention on restored teeth in adults: a practice-based study 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 Objectives Evaluate the need for re-intervention on dental coronal restorations in adults seen in a network of general dental practitioners (ReCOL). Materials and methods This observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study involved 40 practitioners and 400 patients. Coronal restoration failures (needing re-intervention for unsatisfactory outcomes) were assessed with a simplified rating scale of seven criteria from the FDI World Dental Federation. The oral health status, the risk factors, and Oral Health Impact Profile-14 were also examined. Previous restoration characteristics (extent, technique, material) were analyzed according to the need for re-intervention (yes/no), the age group, and the risk profile. Qualitative variables were compared between “re-intervention” and “no re-intervention” group using Fisher exact test. Results The need for re-intervention was estimated at 74% (95% CI: 70; 79); it increased with age (49 to 90%), unfavorable risk profile (82 vs. 62%), and extent of the filling (32, 39, 44, and 44% on 1, 2, 3 surfaces, and crowns, respectively). More posterior than anterior teeth were restored (median per patient: 6 vs. 1) or needed re-intervention (median per patient: 1 vs. 0). Conclusions The needs for re-intervention in adults are still high within a context of ever-changing materials and techniques, simplified and rationalized decision-makings, and demands for patient involvement. Clinical relevance Meeting these needs requires the following: (i) consensus definitions and assessment methods for “failure” and (ii) reliable feedbacks on materials, procedures, and satisfaction. Building large and detailed databases fed by networks of motivated practitioners will help analyzing complex success/failure data by artificial intelligence and guiding treatment and research. Community care network (dpeaa)DE-He213 Cross-sectional study (dpeaa)DE-He213 Dental restoration failure (dpeaa)DE-He213 Patient satisfaction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Private practice; Risk factor (dpeaa)DE-He213 Dantony, Emmanuelle aut Chevalier, Charlène aut David, Alexandra aut Garyga, Valentin aut Tohmé, Marie aut Gueyffier, François aut Nony, Patrice aut Maucort-Boulch, Delphine aut Grosgogeat, Brigitte (orcid)0000-0003-2194-7300 aut Enthalten in Clinical Oral Investigations Springer-Verlag, 2001 26(2021), 1 vom: 24. Juli, Seite 789-801 (DE-627)SPR007794231 nnns volume:26 year:2021 number:1 day:24 month:07 pages:789-801 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04058-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 26 2021 1 24 07 789-801 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Clinical Oral Investigations 26(2021), 1 vom: 24. Juli, Seite 789-801 volume:26 year:2021 number:1 day:24 month:07 pages:789-801 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Clinical Oral Investigations 26(2021), 1 vom: 24. Juli, Seite 789-801 volume:26 year:2021 number:1 day:24 month:07 pages:789-801 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Community care network Cross-sectional study Dental restoration failure Patient satisfaction Private practice; Risk factor |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Clinical Oral Investigations |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Decup, Franck @@aut@@ Dantony, Emmanuelle @@aut@@ Chevalier, Charlène @@aut@@ David, Alexandra @@aut@@ Garyga, Valentin @@aut@@ Tohmé, Marie @@aut@@ Gueyffier, François @@aut@@ Nony, Patrice @@aut@@ Maucort-Boulch, Delphine @@aut@@ Grosgogeat, Brigitte @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2021-07-24T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
SPR007794231 |
| id |
SPR046064133 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR046064133</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230507092304.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220127s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00784-021-04058-5</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR046064133</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s00784-021-04058-5-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Decup, Franck</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Needs for re-intervention on restored teeth in adults: a practice-based study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Objectives Evaluate the need for re-intervention on dental coronal restorations in adults seen in a network of general dental practitioners (ReCOL). Materials and methods This observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study involved 40 practitioners and 400 patients. Coronal restoration failures (needing re-intervention for unsatisfactory outcomes) were assessed with a simplified rating scale of seven criteria from the FDI World Dental Federation. The oral health status, the risk factors, and Oral Health Impact Profile-14 were also examined. Previous restoration characteristics (extent, technique, material) were analyzed according to the need for re-intervention (yes/no), the age group, and the risk profile. Qualitative variables were compared between “re-intervention” and “no re-intervention” group using Fisher exact test. Results The need for re-intervention was estimated at 74% (95% CI: 70; 79); it increased with age (49 to 90%), unfavorable risk profile (82 vs. 62%), and extent of the filling (32, 39, 44, and 44% on 1, 2, 3 surfaces, and crowns, respectively). More posterior than anterior teeth were restored (median per patient: 6 vs. 1) or needed re-intervention (median per patient: 1 vs. 0). Conclusions The needs for re-intervention in adults are still high within a context of ever-changing materials and techniques, simplified and rationalized decision-makings, and demands for patient involvement. Clinical relevance Meeting these needs requires the following: (i) consensus definitions and assessment methods for “failure” and (ii) reliable feedbacks on materials, procedures, and satisfaction. Building large and detailed databases fed by networks of motivated practitioners will help analyzing complex success/failure data by artificial intelligence and guiding treatment and research.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Community care network</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cross-sectional study</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Dental restoration failure</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Patient satisfaction</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Private practice; Risk factor</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dantony, Emmanuelle</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chevalier, Charlène</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">David, Alexandra</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Garyga, Valentin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tohmé, Marie</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gueyffier, François</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nony, Patrice</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Maucort-Boulch, Delphine</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Grosgogeat, Brigitte</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-2194-7300</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Clinical Oral Investigations</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 2001</subfield><subfield code="g">26(2021), 1 vom: 24. Juli, Seite 789-801</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR007794231</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:26</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:24</subfield><subfield code="g">month:07</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:789-801</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04058-5</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">26</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">24</subfield><subfield code="c">07</subfield><subfield code="h">789-801</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Decup, Franck |
| spellingShingle |
Decup, Franck misc Community care network misc Cross-sectional study misc Dental restoration failure misc Patient satisfaction misc Private practice; Risk factor Needs for re-intervention on restored teeth in adults: a practice-based study |
| authorStr |
Decup, Franck |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)SPR007794231 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
Needs for re-intervention on restored teeth in adults: a practice-based study Community care network (dpeaa)DE-He213 Cross-sectional study (dpeaa)DE-He213 Dental restoration failure (dpeaa)DE-He213 Patient satisfaction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Private practice; Risk factor (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
misc Community care network misc Cross-sectional study misc Dental restoration failure misc Patient satisfaction misc Private practice; Risk factor |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Community care network misc Cross-sectional study misc Dental restoration failure misc Patient satisfaction misc Private practice; Risk factor |
| topic_browse |
misc Community care network misc Cross-sectional study misc Dental restoration failure misc Patient satisfaction misc Private practice; Risk factor |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Clinical Oral Investigations |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
SPR007794231 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Clinical Oral Investigations |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)SPR007794231 |
| title |
Needs for re-intervention on restored teeth in adults: a practice-based study |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR046064133 (SPR)s00784-021-04058-5-e |
| title_full |
Needs for re-intervention on restored teeth in adults: a practice-based study |
| author_sort |
Decup, Franck |
| journal |
Clinical Oral Investigations |
| journalStr |
Clinical Oral Investigations |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2021 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
789 |
| author_browse |
Decup, Franck Dantony, Emmanuelle Chevalier, Charlène David, Alexandra Garyga, Valentin Tohmé, Marie Gueyffier, François Nony, Patrice Maucort-Boulch, Delphine Grosgogeat, Brigitte |
| container_volume |
26 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Decup, Franck |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s00784-021-04058-5 |
| normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0003-2194-7300 |
| normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0003-2194-7300 |
| title_sort |
needs for re-intervention on restored teeth in adults: a practice-based study |
| title_auth |
Needs for re-intervention on restored teeth in adults: a practice-based study |
| abstract |
Objectives Evaluate the need for re-intervention on dental coronal restorations in adults seen in a network of general dental practitioners (ReCOL). Materials and methods This observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study involved 40 practitioners and 400 patients. Coronal restoration failures (needing re-intervention for unsatisfactory outcomes) were assessed with a simplified rating scale of seven criteria from the FDI World Dental Federation. The oral health status, the risk factors, and Oral Health Impact Profile-14 were also examined. Previous restoration characteristics (extent, technique, material) were analyzed according to the need for re-intervention (yes/no), the age group, and the risk profile. Qualitative variables were compared between “re-intervention” and “no re-intervention” group using Fisher exact test. Results The need for re-intervention was estimated at 74% (95% CI: 70; 79); it increased with age (49 to 90%), unfavorable risk profile (82 vs. 62%), and extent of the filling (32, 39, 44, and 44% on 1, 2, 3 surfaces, and crowns, respectively). More posterior than anterior teeth were restored (median per patient: 6 vs. 1) or needed re-intervention (median per patient: 1 vs. 0). Conclusions The needs for re-intervention in adults are still high within a context of ever-changing materials and techniques, simplified and rationalized decision-makings, and demands for patient involvement. Clinical relevance Meeting these needs requires the following: (i) consensus definitions and assessment methods for “failure” and (ii) reliable feedbacks on materials, procedures, and satisfaction. Building large and detailed databases fed by networks of motivated practitioners will help analyzing complex success/failure data by artificial intelligence and guiding treatment and research. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 |
| abstractGer |
Objectives Evaluate the need for re-intervention on dental coronal restorations in adults seen in a network of general dental practitioners (ReCOL). Materials and methods This observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study involved 40 practitioners and 400 patients. Coronal restoration failures (needing re-intervention for unsatisfactory outcomes) were assessed with a simplified rating scale of seven criteria from the FDI World Dental Federation. The oral health status, the risk factors, and Oral Health Impact Profile-14 were also examined. Previous restoration characteristics (extent, technique, material) were analyzed according to the need for re-intervention (yes/no), the age group, and the risk profile. Qualitative variables were compared between “re-intervention” and “no re-intervention” group using Fisher exact test. Results The need for re-intervention was estimated at 74% (95% CI: 70; 79); it increased with age (49 to 90%), unfavorable risk profile (82 vs. 62%), and extent of the filling (32, 39, 44, and 44% on 1, 2, 3 surfaces, and crowns, respectively). More posterior than anterior teeth were restored (median per patient: 6 vs. 1) or needed re-intervention (median per patient: 1 vs. 0). Conclusions The needs for re-intervention in adults are still high within a context of ever-changing materials and techniques, simplified and rationalized decision-makings, and demands for patient involvement. Clinical relevance Meeting these needs requires the following: (i) consensus definitions and assessment methods for “failure” and (ii) reliable feedbacks on materials, procedures, and satisfaction. Building large and detailed databases fed by networks of motivated practitioners will help analyzing complex success/failure data by artificial intelligence and guiding treatment and research. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Objectives Evaluate the need for re-intervention on dental coronal restorations in adults seen in a network of general dental practitioners (ReCOL). Materials and methods This observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study involved 40 practitioners and 400 patients. Coronal restoration failures (needing re-intervention for unsatisfactory outcomes) were assessed with a simplified rating scale of seven criteria from the FDI World Dental Federation. The oral health status, the risk factors, and Oral Health Impact Profile-14 were also examined. Previous restoration characteristics (extent, technique, material) were analyzed according to the need for re-intervention (yes/no), the age group, and the risk profile. Qualitative variables were compared between “re-intervention” and “no re-intervention” group using Fisher exact test. Results The need for re-intervention was estimated at 74% (95% CI: 70; 79); it increased with age (49 to 90%), unfavorable risk profile (82 vs. 62%), and extent of the filling (32, 39, 44, and 44% on 1, 2, 3 surfaces, and crowns, respectively). More posterior than anterior teeth were restored (median per patient: 6 vs. 1) or needed re-intervention (median per patient: 1 vs. 0). Conclusions The needs for re-intervention in adults are still high within a context of ever-changing materials and techniques, simplified and rationalized decision-makings, and demands for patient involvement. Clinical relevance Meeting these needs requires the following: (i) consensus definitions and assessment methods for “failure” and (ii) reliable feedbacks on materials, procedures, and satisfaction. Building large and detailed databases fed by networks of motivated practitioners will help analyzing complex success/failure data by artificial intelligence and guiding treatment and research. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
Needs for re-intervention on restored teeth in adults: a practice-based study |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04058-5 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Dantony, Emmanuelle Chevalier, Charlène David, Alexandra Garyga, Valentin Tohmé, Marie Gueyffier, François Nony, Patrice Maucort-Boulch, Delphine Grosgogeat, Brigitte |
| author2Str |
Dantony, Emmanuelle Chevalier, Charlène David, Alexandra Garyga, Valentin Tohmé, Marie Gueyffier, François Nony, Patrice Maucort-Boulch, Delphine Grosgogeat, Brigitte |
| ppnlink |
SPR007794231 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s00784-021-04058-5 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T20:07:13.253Z |
| _version_ |
1803589761897594880 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR046064133</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230507092304.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220127s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00784-021-04058-5</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR046064133</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s00784-021-04058-5-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Decup, Franck</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Needs for re-intervention on restored teeth in adults: a practice-based study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Objectives Evaluate the need for re-intervention on dental coronal restorations in adults seen in a network of general dental practitioners (ReCOL). Materials and methods This observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study involved 40 practitioners and 400 patients. Coronal restoration failures (needing re-intervention for unsatisfactory outcomes) were assessed with a simplified rating scale of seven criteria from the FDI World Dental Federation. The oral health status, the risk factors, and Oral Health Impact Profile-14 were also examined. Previous restoration characteristics (extent, technique, material) were analyzed according to the need for re-intervention (yes/no), the age group, and the risk profile. Qualitative variables were compared between “re-intervention” and “no re-intervention” group using Fisher exact test. Results The need for re-intervention was estimated at 74% (95% CI: 70; 79); it increased with age (49 to 90%), unfavorable risk profile (82 vs. 62%), and extent of the filling (32, 39, 44, and 44% on 1, 2, 3 surfaces, and crowns, respectively). More posterior than anterior teeth were restored (median per patient: 6 vs. 1) or needed re-intervention (median per patient: 1 vs. 0). Conclusions The needs for re-intervention in adults are still high within a context of ever-changing materials and techniques, simplified and rationalized decision-makings, and demands for patient involvement. Clinical relevance Meeting these needs requires the following: (i) consensus definitions and assessment methods for “failure” and (ii) reliable feedbacks on materials, procedures, and satisfaction. Building large and detailed databases fed by networks of motivated practitioners will help analyzing complex success/failure data by artificial intelligence and guiding treatment and research.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Community care network</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cross-sectional study</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Dental restoration failure</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Patient satisfaction</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Private practice; Risk factor</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dantony, Emmanuelle</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chevalier, Charlène</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">David, Alexandra</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Garyga, Valentin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tohmé, Marie</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gueyffier, François</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nony, Patrice</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Maucort-Boulch, Delphine</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Grosgogeat, Brigitte</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-2194-7300</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Clinical Oral Investigations</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 2001</subfield><subfield code="g">26(2021), 1 vom: 24. Juli, Seite 789-801</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR007794231</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:26</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:24</subfield><subfield code="g">month:07</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:789-801</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04058-5</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">26</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">24</subfield><subfield code="c">07</subfield><subfield code="h">789-801</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3992643 |