Caregiver Involvement in MS: Duty or Disruption?

Abstract Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex condition with numerous physical, cognitive and emotional symptoms. These may necessitate significant, permanent lifestyle changes for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and their caregivers and families, meaning it is important in contemporary neurol...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Kesselring, Jürg [verfasserIn] Boyko, Alexey Laroni, Alice Bharadia, Trishna van Galen, Pieter Alexandri, Nektaria

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2021

Schlagwörter:	Multiple sclerosis Communication Adherence Care satisfaction Quality of life Relationships Consultation style Shared care, caregiver

Anmerkung:	© The Author(s) 2021

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Neurology and Therapy - Berlin : Springer, 2012, 11(2021), 1 vom: 18. Nov., Seite 9-20
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:11 ; year:2021 ; number:1 ; day:18 ; month:11 ; pages:9-20

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.1007/s40120-021-00299-4

Katalog-ID:	SPR046281584

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	SPR046281584
003	DE-627
005	20240214064656.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	220219s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1007/s40120-021-00299-4 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)SPR046281584
035			\|a (SPR)s40120-021-00299-4-e
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
100	1		\|a Kesselring, Jürg \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Caregiver Involvement in MS: Duty or Disruption?
264		1	\|c 2021
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
500			\|a © The Author(s) 2021
520			\|a Abstract Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex condition with numerous physical, cognitive and emotional symptoms. These may necessitate significant, permanent lifestyle changes for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and their caregivers and families, meaning it is important in contemporary neurological practice to consider including families and/or caregivers in the management of MS. However, existing evidence suggests that family involvement is not always beneficial; for example, it can exert either a strong positive or negative influence on the ability of PwMS to achieve optimal outcomes from their treatment and disease management. This paper, based on a live debate between neurologists and PwMS, examines the current perceptions on constructive involvement of families and caregivers in consultations for and management of MS, and reveals several areas where additional studies are warranted. Shared decision-making in MS has historically been a collaboration solely between healthcare professionals (HCPs) and PwMS, but PwMS are now more frequently being accompanied to appointments by a support person. This paper encourages HCPs to understand the dynamics between PwMS and their support person, and to individualize consultations and information accordingly. Family and caregiver involvement in the provision of care for PwMS needs to be for the benefit of, and at the discretion of, the PwMS. Support for families of PwMS, although important, may be more effectively and appropriately delivered through other channels outside of the clinical setting. Educating HCPs on the current patient experience to enable them to provide improved personalized care will ensure a mutualistic, patient-centred relationship with PwMS, which will help to optimize outcomes. Communication tools may also facilitate these interactions.
520			\|a Plain Language Summary Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a highly variable condition. The uncertainty this brings can affect the mental well-being of the entire family of someone living with MS. Additionally, people with MS may need help administering and remembering to use medicines, and require changes to the way they live their life (e.g. employment decisions, home adjustments and care), which can also disrupt the family’s lifestyle. The family undoubtedly needs to be involved in certain decisions, such as family planning, or when caring for very young or old people with MS. However, extensive family involvement may not always be a good thing for all people with MS. Therefore, it is the responsibility of healthcare professionals to understand the pivotal role of the caregiver and seek appropriate opportunities to engage with family and support persons on a case-by-case basis. To highlight the importance of family members in the management of MS, an international group of expert neurologists and people with MS discussed the best ways to involve families in consultations and decision-making, without disrupting care or undermining the independence of the people with MS. The group stresses that a family’s involvement in the provision of care needs to be for the benefit of the people with MS and that many factors can influence whether family involvement is perceived positively or negatively by the people with MS. Support for the family is important; however, it may be more appropriately delivered outside the healthcare professional consultation, and instead provided by a patient or caregiver organization.
650		4	\|a Multiple sclerosis \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Communication \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Adherence \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Care satisfaction \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Quality of life \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Relationships \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Consultation style \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Shared care, caregiver \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
700	1		\|a Boyko, Alexey \|0 (orcid)0000-0002-2975-4151 \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Laroni, Alice \|0 (orcid)0000-0001-5599-9788 \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Bharadia, Trishna \|0 (orcid)0000-0003-3633-729X \|4 aut
700	1		\|a van Galen, Pieter \|0 (orcid)0000-0001-7074-2550 \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Alexandri, Nektaria \|0 (orcid)0000-0002-9806-8358 \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Neurology and Therapy \|d Berlin : Springer, 2012 \|g 11(2021), 1 vom: 18. Nov., Seite 9-20 \|w (DE-627)726126209 \|w (DE-600)2682228-3 \|x 2193-6536 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:11 \|g year:2021 \|g number:1 \|g day:18 \|g month:11 \|g pages:9-20
856	4	0	\|u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40120-021-00299-4 \|z kostenfrei \|3 Volltext
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_SPRINGER
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 11 \|j 2021 \|e 1 \|b 18 \|c 11 \|h 9-20

Indexfelder

author_variant	j k jk a b ab a l al t b tb g p v gp gpv n a na
matchkey_str	article:21936536:2021----::aeieivleetnsuyr
hierarchy_sort_str	2021
publishDate	2021
allfields	10.1007/s40120-021-00299-4 doi (DE-627)SPR046281584 (SPR)s40120-021-00299-4-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kesselring, Jürg verfasserin aut Caregiver Involvement in MS: Duty or Disruption? 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex condition with numerous physical, cognitive and emotional symptoms. These may necessitate significant, permanent lifestyle changes for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and their caregivers and families, meaning it is important in contemporary neurological practice to consider including families and/or caregivers in the management of MS. However, existing evidence suggests that family involvement is not always beneficial; for example, it can exert either a strong positive or negative influence on the ability of PwMS to achieve optimal outcomes from their treatment and disease management. This paper, based on a live debate between neurologists and PwMS, examines the current perceptions on constructive involvement of families and caregivers in consultations for and management of MS, and reveals several areas where additional studies are warranted. Shared decision-making in MS has historically been a collaboration solely between healthcare professionals (HCPs) and PwMS, but PwMS are now more frequently being accompanied to appointments by a support person. This paper encourages HCPs to understand the dynamics between PwMS and their support person, and to individualize consultations and information accordingly. Family and caregiver involvement in the provision of care for PwMS needs to be for the benefit of, and at the discretion of, the PwMS. Support for families of PwMS, although important, may be more effectively and appropriately delivered through other channels outside of the clinical setting. Educating HCPs on the current patient experience to enable them to provide improved personalized care will ensure a mutualistic, patient-centred relationship with PwMS, which will help to optimize outcomes. Communication tools may also facilitate these interactions. Plain Language Summary Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a highly variable condition. The uncertainty this brings can affect the mental well-being of the entire family of someone living with MS. Additionally, people with MS may need help administering and remembering to use medicines, and require changes to the way they live their life (e.g. employment decisions, home adjustments and care), which can also disrupt the family’s lifestyle. The family undoubtedly needs to be involved in certain decisions, such as family planning, or when caring for very young or old people with MS. However, extensive family involvement may not always be a good thing for all people with MS. Therefore, it is the responsibility of healthcare professionals to understand the pivotal role of the caregiver and seek appropriate opportunities to engage with family and support persons on a case-by-case basis. To highlight the importance of family members in the management of MS, an international group of expert neurologists and people with MS discussed the best ways to involve families in consultations and decision-making, without disrupting care or undermining the independence of the people with MS. The group stresses that a family’s involvement in the provision of care needs to be for the benefit of the people with MS and that many factors can influence whether family involvement is perceived positively or negatively by the people with MS. Support for the family is important; however, it may be more appropriately delivered outside the healthcare professional consultation, and instead provided by a patient or caregiver organization. Multiple sclerosis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Communication (dpeaa)DE-He213 Adherence (dpeaa)DE-He213 Care satisfaction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Quality of life (dpeaa)DE-He213 Relationships (dpeaa)DE-He213 Consultation style (dpeaa)DE-He213 Shared care, caregiver (dpeaa)DE-He213 Boyko, Alexey (orcid)0000-0002-2975-4151 aut Laroni, Alice (orcid)0000-0001-5599-9788 aut Bharadia, Trishna (orcid)0000-0003-3633-729X aut van Galen, Pieter (orcid)0000-0001-7074-2550 aut Alexandri, Nektaria (orcid)0000-0002-9806-8358 aut Enthalten in Neurology and Therapy Berlin : Springer, 2012 11(2021), 1 vom: 18. Nov., Seite 9-20 (DE-627)726126209 (DE-600)2682228-3 2193-6536 nnns volume:11 year:2021 number:1 day:18 month:11 pages:9-20 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40120-021-00299-4 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2021 1 18 11 9-20
spelling	10.1007/s40120-021-00299-4 doi (DE-627)SPR046281584 (SPR)s40120-021-00299-4-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kesselring, Jürg verfasserin aut Caregiver Involvement in MS: Duty or Disruption? 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex condition with numerous physical, cognitive and emotional symptoms. These may necessitate significant, permanent lifestyle changes for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and their caregivers and families, meaning it is important in contemporary neurological practice to consider including families and/or caregivers in the management of MS. However, existing evidence suggests that family involvement is not always beneficial; for example, it can exert either a strong positive or negative influence on the ability of PwMS to achieve optimal outcomes from their treatment and disease management. This paper, based on a live debate between neurologists and PwMS, examines the current perceptions on constructive involvement of families and caregivers in consultations for and management of MS, and reveals several areas where additional studies are warranted. Shared decision-making in MS has historically been a collaboration solely between healthcare professionals (HCPs) and PwMS, but PwMS are now more frequently being accompanied to appointments by a support person. This paper encourages HCPs to understand the dynamics between PwMS and their support person, and to individualize consultations and information accordingly. Family and caregiver involvement in the provision of care for PwMS needs to be for the benefit of, and at the discretion of, the PwMS. Support for families of PwMS, although important, may be more effectively and appropriately delivered through other channels outside of the clinical setting. Educating HCPs on the current patient experience to enable them to provide improved personalized care will ensure a mutualistic, patient-centred relationship with PwMS, which will help to optimize outcomes. Communication tools may also facilitate these interactions. Plain Language Summary Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a highly variable condition. The uncertainty this brings can affect the mental well-being of the entire family of someone living with MS. Additionally, people with MS may need help administering and remembering to use medicines, and require changes to the way they live their life (e.g. employment decisions, home adjustments and care), which can also disrupt the family’s lifestyle. The family undoubtedly needs to be involved in certain decisions, such as family planning, or when caring for very young or old people with MS. However, extensive family involvement may not always be a good thing for all people with MS. Therefore, it is the responsibility of healthcare professionals to understand the pivotal role of the caregiver and seek appropriate opportunities to engage with family and support persons on a case-by-case basis. To highlight the importance of family members in the management of MS, an international group of expert neurologists and people with MS discussed the best ways to involve families in consultations and decision-making, without disrupting care or undermining the independence of the people with MS. The group stresses that a family’s involvement in the provision of care needs to be for the benefit of the people with MS and that many factors can influence whether family involvement is perceived positively or negatively by the people with MS. Support for the family is important; however, it may be more appropriately delivered outside the healthcare professional consultation, and instead provided by a patient or caregiver organization. Multiple sclerosis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Communication (dpeaa)DE-He213 Adherence (dpeaa)DE-He213 Care satisfaction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Quality of life (dpeaa)DE-He213 Relationships (dpeaa)DE-He213 Consultation style (dpeaa)DE-He213 Shared care, caregiver (dpeaa)DE-He213 Boyko, Alexey (orcid)0000-0002-2975-4151 aut Laroni, Alice (orcid)0000-0001-5599-9788 aut Bharadia, Trishna (orcid)0000-0003-3633-729X aut van Galen, Pieter (orcid)0000-0001-7074-2550 aut Alexandri, Nektaria (orcid)0000-0002-9806-8358 aut Enthalten in Neurology and Therapy Berlin : Springer, 2012 11(2021), 1 vom: 18. Nov., Seite 9-20 (DE-627)726126209 (DE-600)2682228-3 2193-6536 nnns volume:11 year:2021 number:1 day:18 month:11 pages:9-20 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40120-021-00299-4 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2021 1 18 11 9-20
allfields_unstemmed	10.1007/s40120-021-00299-4 doi (DE-627)SPR046281584 (SPR)s40120-021-00299-4-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kesselring, Jürg verfasserin aut Caregiver Involvement in MS: Duty or Disruption? 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex condition with numerous physical, cognitive and emotional symptoms. These may necessitate significant, permanent lifestyle changes for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and their caregivers and families, meaning it is important in contemporary neurological practice to consider including families and/or caregivers in the management of MS. However, existing evidence suggests that family involvement is not always beneficial; for example, it can exert either a strong positive or negative influence on the ability of PwMS to achieve optimal outcomes from their treatment and disease management. This paper, based on a live debate between neurologists and PwMS, examines the current perceptions on constructive involvement of families and caregivers in consultations for and management of MS, and reveals several areas where additional studies are warranted. Shared decision-making in MS has historically been a collaboration solely between healthcare professionals (HCPs) and PwMS, but PwMS are now more frequently being accompanied to appointments by a support person. This paper encourages HCPs to understand the dynamics between PwMS and their support person, and to individualize consultations and information accordingly. Family and caregiver involvement in the provision of care for PwMS needs to be for the benefit of, and at the discretion of, the PwMS. Support for families of PwMS, although important, may be more effectively and appropriately delivered through other channels outside of the clinical setting. Educating HCPs on the current patient experience to enable them to provide improved personalized care will ensure a mutualistic, patient-centred relationship with PwMS, which will help to optimize outcomes. Communication tools may also facilitate these interactions. Plain Language Summary Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a highly variable condition. The uncertainty this brings can affect the mental well-being of the entire family of someone living with MS. Additionally, people with MS may need help administering and remembering to use medicines, and require changes to the way they live their life (e.g. employment decisions, home adjustments and care), which can also disrupt the family’s lifestyle. The family undoubtedly needs to be involved in certain decisions, such as family planning, or when caring for very young or old people with MS. However, extensive family involvement may not always be a good thing for all people with MS. Therefore, it is the responsibility of healthcare professionals to understand the pivotal role of the caregiver and seek appropriate opportunities to engage with family and support persons on a case-by-case basis. To highlight the importance of family members in the management of MS, an international group of expert neurologists and people with MS discussed the best ways to involve families in consultations and decision-making, without disrupting care or undermining the independence of the people with MS. The group stresses that a family’s involvement in the provision of care needs to be for the benefit of the people with MS and that many factors can influence whether family involvement is perceived positively or negatively by the people with MS. Support for the family is important; however, it may be more appropriately delivered outside the healthcare professional consultation, and instead provided by a patient or caregiver organization. Multiple sclerosis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Communication (dpeaa)DE-He213 Adherence (dpeaa)DE-He213 Care satisfaction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Quality of life (dpeaa)DE-He213 Relationships (dpeaa)DE-He213 Consultation style (dpeaa)DE-He213 Shared care, caregiver (dpeaa)DE-He213 Boyko, Alexey (orcid)0000-0002-2975-4151 aut Laroni, Alice (orcid)0000-0001-5599-9788 aut Bharadia, Trishna (orcid)0000-0003-3633-729X aut van Galen, Pieter (orcid)0000-0001-7074-2550 aut Alexandri, Nektaria (orcid)0000-0002-9806-8358 aut Enthalten in Neurology and Therapy Berlin : Springer, 2012 11(2021), 1 vom: 18. Nov., Seite 9-20 (DE-627)726126209 (DE-600)2682228-3 2193-6536 nnns volume:11 year:2021 number:1 day:18 month:11 pages:9-20 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40120-021-00299-4 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2021 1 18 11 9-20
allfieldsGer	10.1007/s40120-021-00299-4 doi (DE-627)SPR046281584 (SPR)s40120-021-00299-4-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kesselring, Jürg verfasserin aut Caregiver Involvement in MS: Duty or Disruption? 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex condition with numerous physical, cognitive and emotional symptoms. These may necessitate significant, permanent lifestyle changes for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and their caregivers and families, meaning it is important in contemporary neurological practice to consider including families and/or caregivers in the management of MS. However, existing evidence suggests that family involvement is not always beneficial; for example, it can exert either a strong positive or negative influence on the ability of PwMS to achieve optimal outcomes from their treatment and disease management. This paper, based on a live debate between neurologists and PwMS, examines the current perceptions on constructive involvement of families and caregivers in consultations for and management of MS, and reveals several areas where additional studies are warranted. Shared decision-making in MS has historically been a collaboration solely between healthcare professionals (HCPs) and PwMS, but PwMS are now more frequently being accompanied to appointments by a support person. This paper encourages HCPs to understand the dynamics between PwMS and their support person, and to individualize consultations and information accordingly. Family and caregiver involvement in the provision of care for PwMS needs to be for the benefit of, and at the discretion of, the PwMS. Support for families of PwMS, although important, may be more effectively and appropriately delivered through other channels outside of the clinical setting. Educating HCPs on the current patient experience to enable them to provide improved personalized care will ensure a mutualistic, patient-centred relationship with PwMS, which will help to optimize outcomes. Communication tools may also facilitate these interactions. Plain Language Summary Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a highly variable condition. The uncertainty this brings can affect the mental well-being of the entire family of someone living with MS. Additionally, people with MS may need help administering and remembering to use medicines, and require changes to the way they live their life (e.g. employment decisions, home adjustments and care), which can also disrupt the family’s lifestyle. The family undoubtedly needs to be involved in certain decisions, such as family planning, or when caring for very young or old people with MS. However, extensive family involvement may not always be a good thing for all people with MS. Therefore, it is the responsibility of healthcare professionals to understand the pivotal role of the caregiver and seek appropriate opportunities to engage with family and support persons on a case-by-case basis. To highlight the importance of family members in the management of MS, an international group of expert neurologists and people with MS discussed the best ways to involve families in consultations and decision-making, without disrupting care or undermining the independence of the people with MS. The group stresses that a family’s involvement in the provision of care needs to be for the benefit of the people with MS and that many factors can influence whether family involvement is perceived positively or negatively by the people with MS. Support for the family is important; however, it may be more appropriately delivered outside the healthcare professional consultation, and instead provided by a patient or caregiver organization. Multiple sclerosis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Communication (dpeaa)DE-He213 Adherence (dpeaa)DE-He213 Care satisfaction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Quality of life (dpeaa)DE-He213 Relationships (dpeaa)DE-He213 Consultation style (dpeaa)DE-He213 Shared care, caregiver (dpeaa)DE-He213 Boyko, Alexey (orcid)0000-0002-2975-4151 aut Laroni, Alice (orcid)0000-0001-5599-9788 aut Bharadia, Trishna (orcid)0000-0003-3633-729X aut van Galen, Pieter (orcid)0000-0001-7074-2550 aut Alexandri, Nektaria (orcid)0000-0002-9806-8358 aut Enthalten in Neurology and Therapy Berlin : Springer, 2012 11(2021), 1 vom: 18. Nov., Seite 9-20 (DE-627)726126209 (DE-600)2682228-3 2193-6536 nnns volume:11 year:2021 number:1 day:18 month:11 pages:9-20 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40120-021-00299-4 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2021 1 18 11 9-20
allfieldsSound	10.1007/s40120-021-00299-4 doi (DE-627)SPR046281584 (SPR)s40120-021-00299-4-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Kesselring, Jürg verfasserin aut Caregiver Involvement in MS: Duty or Disruption? 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex condition with numerous physical, cognitive and emotional symptoms. These may necessitate significant, permanent lifestyle changes for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and their caregivers and families, meaning it is important in contemporary neurological practice to consider including families and/or caregivers in the management of MS. However, existing evidence suggests that family involvement is not always beneficial; for example, it can exert either a strong positive or negative influence on the ability of PwMS to achieve optimal outcomes from their treatment and disease management. This paper, based on a live debate between neurologists and PwMS, examines the current perceptions on constructive involvement of families and caregivers in consultations for and management of MS, and reveals several areas where additional studies are warranted. Shared decision-making in MS has historically been a collaboration solely between healthcare professionals (HCPs) and PwMS, but PwMS are now more frequently being accompanied to appointments by a support person. This paper encourages HCPs to understand the dynamics between PwMS and their support person, and to individualize consultations and information accordingly. Family and caregiver involvement in the provision of care for PwMS needs to be for the benefit of, and at the discretion of, the PwMS. Support for families of PwMS, although important, may be more effectively and appropriately delivered through other channels outside of the clinical setting. Educating HCPs on the current patient experience to enable them to provide improved personalized care will ensure a mutualistic, patient-centred relationship with PwMS, which will help to optimize outcomes. Communication tools may also facilitate these interactions. Plain Language Summary Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a highly variable condition. The uncertainty this brings can affect the mental well-being of the entire family of someone living with MS. Additionally, people with MS may need help administering and remembering to use medicines, and require changes to the way they live their life (e.g. employment decisions, home adjustments and care), which can also disrupt the family’s lifestyle. The family undoubtedly needs to be involved in certain decisions, such as family planning, or when caring for very young or old people with MS. However, extensive family involvement may not always be a good thing for all people with MS. Therefore, it is the responsibility of healthcare professionals to understand the pivotal role of the caregiver and seek appropriate opportunities to engage with family and support persons on a case-by-case basis. To highlight the importance of family members in the management of MS, an international group of expert neurologists and people with MS discussed the best ways to involve families in consultations and decision-making, without disrupting care or undermining the independence of the people with MS. The group stresses that a family’s involvement in the provision of care needs to be for the benefit of the people with MS and that many factors can influence whether family involvement is perceived positively or negatively by the people with MS. Support for the family is important; however, it may be more appropriately delivered outside the healthcare professional consultation, and instead provided by a patient or caregiver organization. Multiple sclerosis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Communication (dpeaa)DE-He213 Adherence (dpeaa)DE-He213 Care satisfaction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Quality of life (dpeaa)DE-He213 Relationships (dpeaa)DE-He213 Consultation style (dpeaa)DE-He213 Shared care, caregiver (dpeaa)DE-He213 Boyko, Alexey (orcid)0000-0002-2975-4151 aut Laroni, Alice (orcid)0000-0001-5599-9788 aut Bharadia, Trishna (orcid)0000-0003-3633-729X aut van Galen, Pieter (orcid)0000-0001-7074-2550 aut Alexandri, Nektaria (orcid)0000-0002-9806-8358 aut Enthalten in Neurology and Therapy Berlin : Springer, 2012 11(2021), 1 vom: 18. Nov., Seite 9-20 (DE-627)726126209 (DE-600)2682228-3 2193-6536 nnns volume:11 year:2021 number:1 day:18 month:11 pages:9-20 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40120-021-00299-4 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2021 1 18 11 9-20
language	English
source	Enthalten in Neurology and Therapy 11(2021), 1 vom: 18. Nov., Seite 9-20 volume:11 year:2021 number:1 day:18 month:11 pages:9-20
sourceStr	Enthalten in Neurology and Therapy 11(2021), 1 vom: 18. Nov., Seite 9-20 volume:11 year:2021 number:1 day:18 month:11 pages:9-20
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Multiple sclerosis Communication Adherence Care satisfaction Quality of life Relationships Consultation style Shared care, caregiver
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Neurology and Therapy
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Kesselring, Jürg @@aut@@ Boyko, Alexey @@aut@@ Laroni, Alice @@aut@@ Bharadia, Trishna @@aut@@ van Galen, Pieter @@aut@@ Alexandri, Nektaria @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2021-11-18T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	726126209
id	SPR046281584
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR046281584</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240214064656.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220219s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s40120-021-00299-4</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR046281584</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s40120-021-00299-4-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kesselring, Jürg</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Caregiver Involvement in MS: Duty or Disruption?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex condition with numerous physical, cognitive and emotional symptoms. These may necessitate significant, permanent lifestyle changes for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and their caregivers and families, meaning it is important in contemporary neurological practice to consider including families and/or caregivers in the management of MS. However, existing evidence suggests that family involvement is not always beneficial; for example, it can exert either a strong positive or negative influence on the ability of PwMS to achieve optimal outcomes from their treatment and disease management. This paper, based on a live debate between neurologists and PwMS, examines the current perceptions on constructive involvement of families and caregivers in consultations for and management of MS, and reveals several areas where additional studies are warranted. Shared decision-making in MS has historically been a collaboration solely between healthcare professionals (HCPs) and PwMS, but PwMS are now more frequently being accompanied to appointments by a support person. This paper encourages HCPs to understand the dynamics between PwMS and their support person, and to individualize consultations and information accordingly. Family and caregiver involvement in the provision of care for PwMS needs to be for the benefit of, and at the discretion of, the PwMS. Support for families of PwMS, although important, may be more effectively and appropriately delivered through other channels outside of the clinical setting. Educating HCPs on the current patient experience to enable them to provide improved personalized care will ensure a mutualistic, patient-centred relationship with PwMS, which will help to optimize outcomes. Communication tools may also facilitate these interactions.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Plain Language Summary Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a highly variable condition. The uncertainty this brings can affect the mental well-being of the entire family of someone living with MS. Additionally, people with MS may need help administering and remembering to use medicines, and require changes to the way they live their life (e.g. employment decisions, home adjustments and care), which can also disrupt the family’s lifestyle. The family undoubtedly needs to be involved in certain decisions, such as family planning, or when caring for very young or old people with MS. However, extensive family involvement may not always be a good thing for all people with MS. Therefore, it is the responsibility of healthcare professionals to understand the pivotal role of the caregiver and seek appropriate opportunities to engage with family and support persons on a case-by-case basis. To highlight the importance of family members in the management of MS, an international group of expert neurologists and people with MS discussed the best ways to involve families in consultations and decision-making, without disrupting care or undermining the independence of the people with MS. The group stresses that a family’s involvement in the provision of care needs to be for the benefit of the people with MS and that many factors can influence whether family involvement is perceived positively or negatively by the people with MS. Support for the family is important; however, it may be more appropriately delivered outside the healthcare professional consultation, and instead provided by a patient or caregiver organization.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Multiple sclerosis</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Communication</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Adherence</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Care satisfaction</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Quality of life</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Relationships</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Consultation style</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Shared care, caregiver</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Boyko, Alexey</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-2975-4151</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Laroni, Alice</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-5599-9788</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bharadia, Trishna</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-3633-729X</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">van Galen, Pieter</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-7074-2550</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alexandri, Nektaria</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-9806-8358</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Neurology and Therapy</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : Springer, 2012</subfield><subfield code="g">11(2021), 1 vom: 18. Nov., Seite 9-20</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)726126209</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2682228-3</subfield><subfield code="x">2193-6536</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:11</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:18</subfield><subfield code="g">month:11</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:9-20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40120-021-00299-4</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">11</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">18</subfield><subfield code="c">11</subfield><subfield code="h">9-20</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Kesselring, Jürg
spellingShingle	Kesselring, Jürg misc Multiple sclerosis misc Communication misc Adherence misc Care satisfaction misc Quality of life misc Relationships misc Consultation style misc Shared care, caregiver Caregiver Involvement in MS: Duty or Disruption?
authorStr	Kesselring, Jürg
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)726126209
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	springer
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	2193-6536
topic_title	Caregiver Involvement in MS: Duty or Disruption? Multiple sclerosis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Communication (dpeaa)DE-He213 Adherence (dpeaa)DE-He213 Care satisfaction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Quality of life (dpeaa)DE-He213 Relationships (dpeaa)DE-He213 Consultation style (dpeaa)DE-He213 Shared care, caregiver (dpeaa)DE-He213
topic	misc Multiple sclerosis misc Communication misc Adherence misc Care satisfaction misc Quality of life misc Relationships misc Consultation style misc Shared care, caregiver
topic_unstemmed	misc Multiple sclerosis misc Communication misc Adherence misc Care satisfaction misc Quality of life misc Relationships misc Consultation style misc Shared care, caregiver
topic_browse	misc Multiple sclerosis misc Communication misc Adherence misc Care satisfaction misc Quality of life misc Relationships misc Consultation style misc Shared care, caregiver
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Neurology and Therapy
hierarchy_parent_id	726126209
hierarchy_top_title	Neurology and Therapy
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)726126209 (DE-600)2682228-3
title	Caregiver Involvement in MS: Duty or Disruption?
ctrlnum	(DE-627)SPR046281584 (SPR)s40120-021-00299-4-e
title_full	Caregiver Involvement in MS: Duty or Disruption?
author_sort	Kesselring, Jürg
journal	Neurology and Therapy
journalStr	Neurology and Therapy
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2021
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	9
author_browse	Kesselring, Jürg Boyko, Alexey Laroni, Alice Bharadia, Trishna van Galen, Pieter Alexandri, Nektaria
container_volume	11
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Kesselring, Jürg
doi_str_mv	10.1007/s40120-021-00299-4
normlink	(ORCID)0000-0002-2975-4151 (ORCID)0000-0001-5599-9788 (ORCID)0000-0003-3633-729X (ORCID)0000-0001-7074-2550 (ORCID)0000-0002-9806-8358
normlink_prefix_str_mv	(orcid)0000-0002-2975-4151 (orcid)0000-0001-5599-9788 (orcid)0000-0003-3633-729X (orcid)0000-0001-7074-2550 (orcid)0000-0002-9806-8358
title_sort	caregiver involvement in ms: duty or disruption?
title_auth	Caregiver Involvement in MS: Duty or Disruption?
abstract	Abstract Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex condition with numerous physical, cognitive and emotional symptoms. These may necessitate significant, permanent lifestyle changes for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and their caregivers and families, meaning it is important in contemporary neurological practice to consider including families and/or caregivers in the management of MS. However, existing evidence suggests that family involvement is not always beneficial; for example, it can exert either a strong positive or negative influence on the ability of PwMS to achieve optimal outcomes from their treatment and disease management. This paper, based on a live debate between neurologists and PwMS, examines the current perceptions on constructive involvement of families and caregivers in consultations for and management of MS, and reveals several areas where additional studies are warranted. Shared decision-making in MS has historically been a collaboration solely between healthcare professionals (HCPs) and PwMS, but PwMS are now more frequently being accompanied to appointments by a support person. This paper encourages HCPs to understand the dynamics between PwMS and their support person, and to individualize consultations and information accordingly. Family and caregiver involvement in the provision of care for PwMS needs to be for the benefit of, and at the discretion of, the PwMS. Support for families of PwMS, although important, may be more effectively and appropriately delivered through other channels outside of the clinical setting. Educating HCPs on the current patient experience to enable them to provide improved personalized care will ensure a mutualistic, patient-centred relationship with PwMS, which will help to optimize outcomes. Communication tools may also facilitate these interactions. Plain Language Summary Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a highly variable condition. The uncertainty this brings can affect the mental well-being of the entire family of someone living with MS. Additionally, people with MS may need help administering and remembering to use medicines, and require changes to the way they live their life (e.g. employment decisions, home adjustments and care), which can also disrupt the family’s lifestyle. The family undoubtedly needs to be involved in certain decisions, such as family planning, or when caring for very young or old people with MS. However, extensive family involvement may not always be a good thing for all people with MS. Therefore, it is the responsibility of healthcare professionals to understand the pivotal role of the caregiver and seek appropriate opportunities to engage with family and support persons on a case-by-case basis. To highlight the importance of family members in the management of MS, an international group of expert neurologists and people with MS discussed the best ways to involve families in consultations and decision-making, without disrupting care or undermining the independence of the people with MS. The group stresses that a family’s involvement in the provision of care needs to be for the benefit of the people with MS and that many factors can influence whether family involvement is perceived positively or negatively by the people with MS. Support for the family is important; however, it may be more appropriately delivered outside the healthcare professional consultation, and instead provided by a patient or caregiver organization. © The Author(s) 2021
abstractGer	Abstract Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex condition with numerous physical, cognitive and emotional symptoms. These may necessitate significant, permanent lifestyle changes for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and their caregivers and families, meaning it is important in contemporary neurological practice to consider including families and/or caregivers in the management of MS. However, existing evidence suggests that family involvement is not always beneficial; for example, it can exert either a strong positive or negative influence on the ability of PwMS to achieve optimal outcomes from their treatment and disease management. This paper, based on a live debate between neurologists and PwMS, examines the current perceptions on constructive involvement of families and caregivers in consultations for and management of MS, and reveals several areas where additional studies are warranted. Shared decision-making in MS has historically been a collaboration solely between healthcare professionals (HCPs) and PwMS, but PwMS are now more frequently being accompanied to appointments by a support person. This paper encourages HCPs to understand the dynamics between PwMS and their support person, and to individualize consultations and information accordingly. Family and caregiver involvement in the provision of care for PwMS needs to be for the benefit of, and at the discretion of, the PwMS. Support for families of PwMS, although important, may be more effectively and appropriately delivered through other channels outside of the clinical setting. Educating HCPs on the current patient experience to enable them to provide improved personalized care will ensure a mutualistic, patient-centred relationship with PwMS, which will help to optimize outcomes. Communication tools may also facilitate these interactions. Plain Language Summary Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a highly variable condition. The uncertainty this brings can affect the mental well-being of the entire family of someone living with MS. Additionally, people with MS may need help administering and remembering to use medicines, and require changes to the way they live their life (e.g. employment decisions, home adjustments and care), which can also disrupt the family’s lifestyle. The family undoubtedly needs to be involved in certain decisions, such as family planning, or when caring for very young or old people with MS. However, extensive family involvement may not always be a good thing for all people with MS. Therefore, it is the responsibility of healthcare professionals to understand the pivotal role of the caregiver and seek appropriate opportunities to engage with family and support persons on a case-by-case basis. To highlight the importance of family members in the management of MS, an international group of expert neurologists and people with MS discussed the best ways to involve families in consultations and decision-making, without disrupting care or undermining the independence of the people with MS. The group stresses that a family’s involvement in the provision of care needs to be for the benefit of the people with MS and that many factors can influence whether family involvement is perceived positively or negatively by the people with MS. Support for the family is important; however, it may be more appropriately delivered outside the healthcare professional consultation, and instead provided by a patient or caregiver organization. © The Author(s) 2021
abstract_unstemmed	Abstract Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex condition with numerous physical, cognitive and emotional symptoms. These may necessitate significant, permanent lifestyle changes for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and their caregivers and families, meaning it is important in contemporary neurological practice to consider including families and/or caregivers in the management of MS. However, existing evidence suggests that family involvement is not always beneficial; for example, it can exert either a strong positive or negative influence on the ability of PwMS to achieve optimal outcomes from their treatment and disease management. This paper, based on a live debate between neurologists and PwMS, examines the current perceptions on constructive involvement of families and caregivers in consultations for and management of MS, and reveals several areas where additional studies are warranted. Shared decision-making in MS has historically been a collaboration solely between healthcare professionals (HCPs) and PwMS, but PwMS are now more frequently being accompanied to appointments by a support person. This paper encourages HCPs to understand the dynamics between PwMS and their support person, and to individualize consultations and information accordingly. Family and caregiver involvement in the provision of care for PwMS needs to be for the benefit of, and at the discretion of, the PwMS. Support for families of PwMS, although important, may be more effectively and appropriately delivered through other channels outside of the clinical setting. Educating HCPs on the current patient experience to enable them to provide improved personalized care will ensure a mutualistic, patient-centred relationship with PwMS, which will help to optimize outcomes. Communication tools may also facilitate these interactions. Plain Language Summary Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a highly variable condition. The uncertainty this brings can affect the mental well-being of the entire family of someone living with MS. Additionally, people with MS may need help administering and remembering to use medicines, and require changes to the way they live their life (e.g. employment decisions, home adjustments and care), which can also disrupt the family’s lifestyle. The family undoubtedly needs to be involved in certain decisions, such as family planning, or when caring for very young or old people with MS. However, extensive family involvement may not always be a good thing for all people with MS. Therefore, it is the responsibility of healthcare professionals to understand the pivotal role of the caregiver and seek appropriate opportunities to engage with family and support persons on a case-by-case basis. To highlight the importance of family members in the management of MS, an international group of expert neurologists and people with MS discussed the best ways to involve families in consultations and decision-making, without disrupting care or undermining the independence of the people with MS. The group stresses that a family’s involvement in the provision of care needs to be for the benefit of the people with MS and that many factors can influence whether family involvement is perceived positively or negatively by the people with MS. Support for the family is important; however, it may be more appropriately delivered outside the healthcare professional consultation, and instead provided by a patient or caregiver organization. © The Author(s) 2021
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	1
title_short	Caregiver Involvement in MS: Duty or Disruption?
url	https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40120-021-00299-4
remote_bool	true
author2	Boyko, Alexey Laroni, Alice Bharadia, Trishna van Galen, Pieter Alexandri, Nektaria
author2Str	Boyko, Alexey Laroni, Alice Bharadia, Trishna van Galen, Pieter Alexandri, Nektaria
ppnlink	726126209
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1007/s40120-021-00299-4
up_date	2024-07-03T21:33:15.258Z
_version_	1803595174658441216
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR046281584</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240214064656.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220219s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s40120-021-00299-4</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR046281584</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s40120-021-00299-4-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kesselring, Jürg</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Caregiver Involvement in MS: Duty or Disruption?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex condition with numerous physical, cognitive and emotional symptoms. These may necessitate significant, permanent lifestyle changes for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and their caregivers and families, meaning it is important in contemporary neurological practice to consider including families and/or caregivers in the management of MS. However, existing evidence suggests that family involvement is not always beneficial; for example, it can exert either a strong positive or negative influence on the ability of PwMS to achieve optimal outcomes from their treatment and disease management. This paper, based on a live debate between neurologists and PwMS, examines the current perceptions on constructive involvement of families and caregivers in consultations for and management of MS, and reveals several areas where additional studies are warranted. Shared decision-making in MS has historically been a collaboration solely between healthcare professionals (HCPs) and PwMS, but PwMS are now more frequently being accompanied to appointments by a support person. This paper encourages HCPs to understand the dynamics between PwMS and their support person, and to individualize consultations and information accordingly. Family and caregiver involvement in the provision of care for PwMS needs to be for the benefit of, and at the discretion of, the PwMS. Support for families of PwMS, although important, may be more effectively and appropriately delivered through other channels outside of the clinical setting. Educating HCPs on the current patient experience to enable them to provide improved personalized care will ensure a mutualistic, patient-centred relationship with PwMS, which will help to optimize outcomes. Communication tools may also facilitate these interactions.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Plain Language Summary Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a highly variable condition. The uncertainty this brings can affect the mental well-being of the entire family of someone living with MS. Additionally, people with MS may need help administering and remembering to use medicines, and require changes to the way they live their life (e.g. employment decisions, home adjustments and care), which can also disrupt the family’s lifestyle. The family undoubtedly needs to be involved in certain decisions, such as family planning, or when caring for very young or old people with MS. However, extensive family involvement may not always be a good thing for all people with MS. Therefore, it is the responsibility of healthcare professionals to understand the pivotal role of the caregiver and seek appropriate opportunities to engage with family and support persons on a case-by-case basis. To highlight the importance of family members in the management of MS, an international group of expert neurologists and people with MS discussed the best ways to involve families in consultations and decision-making, without disrupting care or undermining the independence of the people with MS. The group stresses that a family’s involvement in the provision of care needs to be for the benefit of the people with MS and that many factors can influence whether family involvement is perceived positively or negatively by the people with MS. Support for the family is important; however, it may be more appropriately delivered outside the healthcare professional consultation, and instead provided by a patient or caregiver organization.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Multiple sclerosis</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Communication</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Adherence</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Care satisfaction</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Quality of life</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Relationships</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Consultation style</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Shared care, caregiver</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Boyko, Alexey</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-2975-4151</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Laroni, Alice</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-5599-9788</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bharadia, Trishna</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-3633-729X</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">van Galen, Pieter</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-7074-2550</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alexandri, Nektaria</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-9806-8358</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Neurology and Therapy</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : Springer, 2012</subfield><subfield code="g">11(2021), 1 vom: 18. Nov., Seite 9-20</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)726126209</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2682228-3</subfield><subfield code="x">2193-6536</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:11</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:18</subfield><subfield code="g">month:11</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:9-20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40120-021-00299-4</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">11</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">18</subfield><subfield code="c">11</subfield><subfield code="h">9-20</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.401144

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Caregiver Involvement in MS: Duty or Disruption?

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?