Effects of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy on Body Composition for Patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ at 1 Year After Surgery
Purpose Effects of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) versus sleeve gastrectomy (SG) on body composition have not been well compared. This meta-analysis aimed to compare changes in fat mass (FM) and lean tissue mass (LTM) for patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ at 1 year after RYGB and SG. Methods...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Cui, Beibei [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Obesity surgery - New York, NY : Springer, 1991, 32(2022), 5 vom: 16. März, Seite 1658-1666 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:32 ; year:2022 ; number:5 ; day:16 ; month:03 ; pages:1658-1666 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s11695-022-06006-y |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR046683941 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR046683941 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230507151012.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220407s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11695-022-06006-y |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR046683941 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)s11695-022-06006-y-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Cui, Beibei |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Effects of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy on Body Composition for Patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ at 1 Year After Surgery |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022 | ||
| 520 | |a Purpose Effects of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) versus sleeve gastrectomy (SG) on body composition have not been well compared. This meta-analysis aimed to compare changes in fat mass (FM) and lean tissue mass (LTM) for patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ at 1 year after RYGB and SG. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched ending in December 2021 for eligible studies which reported baseline and postsurgical BMI, FM, and LTM. Results Of 17 eligible studies, 831 patients were included, 484 following RYGB and 347 following SG. Weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were from a random-effects model. For patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $, RYGB resulted in a more substantial reduction of BMI (− 14.13 kg/$ m^{2} $ [95%CI − 14.74, − 13.53] versus − 11.96 kg/$ m^{2} $ [95%CI − 12.81, − 11.11], P < 0.001) and FM (− 26.22 kg [95%CI − 28.31, − 24.12] versus − 21.50 kg [95%CI − 25.52, − 17.48], P = 0.042) than SG, and a relatively weaker impact on LTM (− 8.28 kg [95%CI − 9.33, − 7.22] versus − 10.12 kg [95%CI − 11.55, − 8.68], P = 0.043). Conclusion This meta-analysis study indicates that RYGB is superior to SG in reducing excess FM for patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ and seems to be more beneficial when LTM preservation is taken into consideration. Graphical abstract | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Fat mass |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Lean tissue mass |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Meta-analysis |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Sleeve gastrectomy |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhu, Liyong |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhu, Shaihong |0 (orcid)0000-0001-6209-3132 |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Obesity surgery |d New York, NY : Springer, 1991 |g 32(2022), 5 vom: 16. März, Seite 1658-1666 |w (DE-627)353900508 |w (DE-600)2087903-9 |x 1708-0428 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:32 |g year:2022 |g number:5 |g day:16 |g month:03 |g pages:1658-1666 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-06006-y |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_101 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_120 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_138 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_150 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_152 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_171 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_187 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_250 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_281 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_636 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2001 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2007 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2008 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2010 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2021 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2026 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2027 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2031 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2037 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2038 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2039 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2049 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2050 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2056 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2057 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2059 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2061 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2064 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2065 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2068 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2088 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2093 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2106 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2107 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2108 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2110 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2113 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2118 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2122 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2129 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2143 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2144 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2147 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2148 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2152 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2153 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2188 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2190 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2232 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2336 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2446 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2470 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2472 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2507 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2522 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2548 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4046 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4242 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4246 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4251 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4328 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4333 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4334 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4336 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4393 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 32 |j 2022 |e 5 |b 16 |c 03 |h 1658-1666 | ||
| author_variant |
b c bc l z lz s z sz |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:17080428:2022----::fetorueyatibpsvrusevgsrcoynoyopstofrainsih |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s11695-022-06006-y doi (DE-627)SPR046683941 (SPR)s11695-022-06006-y-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Cui, Beibei verfasserin aut Effects of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy on Body Composition for Patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ at 1 Year After Surgery 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022 Purpose Effects of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) versus sleeve gastrectomy (SG) on body composition have not been well compared. This meta-analysis aimed to compare changes in fat mass (FM) and lean tissue mass (LTM) for patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ at 1 year after RYGB and SG. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched ending in December 2021 for eligible studies which reported baseline and postsurgical BMI, FM, and LTM. Results Of 17 eligible studies, 831 patients were included, 484 following RYGB and 347 following SG. Weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were from a random-effects model. For patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $, RYGB resulted in a more substantial reduction of BMI (− 14.13 kg/$ m^{2} $ [95%CI − 14.74, − 13.53] versus − 11.96 kg/$ m^{2} $ [95%CI − 12.81, − 11.11], P < 0.001) and FM (− 26.22 kg [95%CI − 28.31, − 24.12] versus − 21.50 kg [95%CI − 25.52, − 17.48], P = 0.042) than SG, and a relatively weaker impact on LTM (− 8.28 kg [95%CI − 9.33, − 7.22] versus − 10.12 kg [95%CI − 11.55, − 8.68], P = 0.043). Conclusion This meta-analysis study indicates that RYGB is superior to SG in reducing excess FM for patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ and seems to be more beneficial when LTM preservation is taken into consideration. Graphical abstract Fat mass (dpeaa)DE-He213 Lean tissue mass (dpeaa)DE-He213 Meta-analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sleeve gastrectomy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Zhu, Liyong aut Zhu, Shaihong (orcid)0000-0001-6209-3132 aut Enthalten in Obesity surgery New York, NY : Springer, 1991 32(2022), 5 vom: 16. März, Seite 1658-1666 (DE-627)353900508 (DE-600)2087903-9 1708-0428 nnns volume:32 year:2022 number:5 day:16 month:03 pages:1658-1666 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-06006-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 32 2022 5 16 03 1658-1666 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s11695-022-06006-y doi (DE-627)SPR046683941 (SPR)s11695-022-06006-y-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Cui, Beibei verfasserin aut Effects of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy on Body Composition for Patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ at 1 Year After Surgery 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022 Purpose Effects of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) versus sleeve gastrectomy (SG) on body composition have not been well compared. This meta-analysis aimed to compare changes in fat mass (FM) and lean tissue mass (LTM) for patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ at 1 year after RYGB and SG. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched ending in December 2021 for eligible studies which reported baseline and postsurgical BMI, FM, and LTM. Results Of 17 eligible studies, 831 patients were included, 484 following RYGB and 347 following SG. Weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were from a random-effects model. For patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $, RYGB resulted in a more substantial reduction of BMI (− 14.13 kg/$ m^{2} $ [95%CI − 14.74, − 13.53] versus − 11.96 kg/$ m^{2} $ [95%CI − 12.81, − 11.11], P < 0.001) and FM (− 26.22 kg [95%CI − 28.31, − 24.12] versus − 21.50 kg [95%CI − 25.52, − 17.48], P = 0.042) than SG, and a relatively weaker impact on LTM (− 8.28 kg [95%CI − 9.33, − 7.22] versus − 10.12 kg [95%CI − 11.55, − 8.68], P = 0.043). Conclusion This meta-analysis study indicates that RYGB is superior to SG in reducing excess FM for patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ and seems to be more beneficial when LTM preservation is taken into consideration. Graphical abstract Fat mass (dpeaa)DE-He213 Lean tissue mass (dpeaa)DE-He213 Meta-analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sleeve gastrectomy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Zhu, Liyong aut Zhu, Shaihong (orcid)0000-0001-6209-3132 aut Enthalten in Obesity surgery New York, NY : Springer, 1991 32(2022), 5 vom: 16. März, Seite 1658-1666 (DE-627)353900508 (DE-600)2087903-9 1708-0428 nnns volume:32 year:2022 number:5 day:16 month:03 pages:1658-1666 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-06006-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 32 2022 5 16 03 1658-1666 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s11695-022-06006-y doi (DE-627)SPR046683941 (SPR)s11695-022-06006-y-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Cui, Beibei verfasserin aut Effects of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy on Body Composition for Patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ at 1 Year After Surgery 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022 Purpose Effects of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) versus sleeve gastrectomy (SG) on body composition have not been well compared. This meta-analysis aimed to compare changes in fat mass (FM) and lean tissue mass (LTM) for patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ at 1 year after RYGB and SG. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched ending in December 2021 for eligible studies which reported baseline and postsurgical BMI, FM, and LTM. Results Of 17 eligible studies, 831 patients were included, 484 following RYGB and 347 following SG. Weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were from a random-effects model. For patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $, RYGB resulted in a more substantial reduction of BMI (− 14.13 kg/$ m^{2} $ [95%CI − 14.74, − 13.53] versus − 11.96 kg/$ m^{2} $ [95%CI − 12.81, − 11.11], P < 0.001) and FM (− 26.22 kg [95%CI − 28.31, − 24.12] versus − 21.50 kg [95%CI − 25.52, − 17.48], P = 0.042) than SG, and a relatively weaker impact on LTM (− 8.28 kg [95%CI − 9.33, − 7.22] versus − 10.12 kg [95%CI − 11.55, − 8.68], P = 0.043). Conclusion This meta-analysis study indicates that RYGB is superior to SG in reducing excess FM for patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ and seems to be more beneficial when LTM preservation is taken into consideration. Graphical abstract Fat mass (dpeaa)DE-He213 Lean tissue mass (dpeaa)DE-He213 Meta-analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sleeve gastrectomy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Zhu, Liyong aut Zhu, Shaihong (orcid)0000-0001-6209-3132 aut Enthalten in Obesity surgery New York, NY : Springer, 1991 32(2022), 5 vom: 16. März, Seite 1658-1666 (DE-627)353900508 (DE-600)2087903-9 1708-0428 nnns volume:32 year:2022 number:5 day:16 month:03 pages:1658-1666 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-06006-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 32 2022 5 16 03 1658-1666 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s11695-022-06006-y doi (DE-627)SPR046683941 (SPR)s11695-022-06006-y-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Cui, Beibei verfasserin aut Effects of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy on Body Composition for Patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ at 1 Year After Surgery 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022 Purpose Effects of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) versus sleeve gastrectomy (SG) on body composition have not been well compared. This meta-analysis aimed to compare changes in fat mass (FM) and lean tissue mass (LTM) for patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ at 1 year after RYGB and SG. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched ending in December 2021 for eligible studies which reported baseline and postsurgical BMI, FM, and LTM. Results Of 17 eligible studies, 831 patients were included, 484 following RYGB and 347 following SG. Weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were from a random-effects model. For patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $, RYGB resulted in a more substantial reduction of BMI (− 14.13 kg/$ m^{2} $ [95%CI − 14.74, − 13.53] versus − 11.96 kg/$ m^{2} $ [95%CI − 12.81, − 11.11], P < 0.001) and FM (− 26.22 kg [95%CI − 28.31, − 24.12] versus − 21.50 kg [95%CI − 25.52, − 17.48], P = 0.042) than SG, and a relatively weaker impact on LTM (− 8.28 kg [95%CI − 9.33, − 7.22] versus − 10.12 kg [95%CI − 11.55, − 8.68], P = 0.043). Conclusion This meta-analysis study indicates that RYGB is superior to SG in reducing excess FM for patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ and seems to be more beneficial when LTM preservation is taken into consideration. Graphical abstract Fat mass (dpeaa)DE-He213 Lean tissue mass (dpeaa)DE-He213 Meta-analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sleeve gastrectomy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Zhu, Liyong aut Zhu, Shaihong (orcid)0000-0001-6209-3132 aut Enthalten in Obesity surgery New York, NY : Springer, 1991 32(2022), 5 vom: 16. März, Seite 1658-1666 (DE-627)353900508 (DE-600)2087903-9 1708-0428 nnns volume:32 year:2022 number:5 day:16 month:03 pages:1658-1666 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-06006-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 32 2022 5 16 03 1658-1666 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s11695-022-06006-y doi (DE-627)SPR046683941 (SPR)s11695-022-06006-y-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Cui, Beibei verfasserin aut Effects of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy on Body Composition for Patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ at 1 Year After Surgery 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022 Purpose Effects of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) versus sleeve gastrectomy (SG) on body composition have not been well compared. This meta-analysis aimed to compare changes in fat mass (FM) and lean tissue mass (LTM) for patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ at 1 year after RYGB and SG. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched ending in December 2021 for eligible studies which reported baseline and postsurgical BMI, FM, and LTM. Results Of 17 eligible studies, 831 patients were included, 484 following RYGB and 347 following SG. Weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were from a random-effects model. For patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $, RYGB resulted in a more substantial reduction of BMI (− 14.13 kg/$ m^{2} $ [95%CI − 14.74, − 13.53] versus − 11.96 kg/$ m^{2} $ [95%CI − 12.81, − 11.11], P < 0.001) and FM (− 26.22 kg [95%CI − 28.31, − 24.12] versus − 21.50 kg [95%CI − 25.52, − 17.48], P = 0.042) than SG, and a relatively weaker impact on LTM (− 8.28 kg [95%CI − 9.33, − 7.22] versus − 10.12 kg [95%CI − 11.55, − 8.68], P = 0.043). Conclusion This meta-analysis study indicates that RYGB is superior to SG in reducing excess FM for patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ and seems to be more beneficial when LTM preservation is taken into consideration. Graphical abstract Fat mass (dpeaa)DE-He213 Lean tissue mass (dpeaa)DE-He213 Meta-analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sleeve gastrectomy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Zhu, Liyong aut Zhu, Shaihong (orcid)0000-0001-6209-3132 aut Enthalten in Obesity surgery New York, NY : Springer, 1991 32(2022), 5 vom: 16. März, Seite 1658-1666 (DE-627)353900508 (DE-600)2087903-9 1708-0428 nnns volume:32 year:2022 number:5 day:16 month:03 pages:1658-1666 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-06006-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 32 2022 5 16 03 1658-1666 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Obesity surgery 32(2022), 5 vom: 16. März, Seite 1658-1666 volume:32 year:2022 number:5 day:16 month:03 pages:1658-1666 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Obesity surgery 32(2022), 5 vom: 16. März, Seite 1658-1666 volume:32 year:2022 number:5 day:16 month:03 pages:1658-1666 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Fat mass Lean tissue mass Meta-analysis Roux-en-Y gastric bypass Sleeve gastrectomy |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Obesity surgery |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Cui, Beibei @@aut@@ Zhu, Liyong @@aut@@ Zhu, Shaihong @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-03-16T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
353900508 |
| id |
SPR046683941 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR046683941</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230507151012.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220407s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11695-022-06006-y</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR046683941</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s11695-022-06006-y-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cui, Beibei</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Effects of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy on Body Composition for Patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ at 1 Year After Surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Purpose Effects of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) versus sleeve gastrectomy (SG) on body composition have not been well compared. This meta-analysis aimed to compare changes in fat mass (FM) and lean tissue mass (LTM) for patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ at 1 year after RYGB and SG. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched ending in December 2021 for eligible studies which reported baseline and postsurgical BMI, FM, and LTM. Results Of 17 eligible studies, 831 patients were included, 484 following RYGB and 347 following SG. Weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were from a random-effects model. For patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $, RYGB resulted in a more substantial reduction of BMI (− 14.13 kg/$ m^{2} $ [95%CI − 14.74, − 13.53] versus − 11.96 kg/$ m^{2} $ [95%CI − 12.81, − 11.11], P < 0.001) and FM (− 26.22 kg [95%CI − 28.31, − 24.12] versus − 21.50 kg [95%CI − 25.52, − 17.48], P = 0.042) than SG, and a relatively weaker impact on LTM (− 8.28 kg [95%CI − 9.33, − 7.22] versus − 10.12 kg [95%CI − 11.55, − 8.68], P = 0.043). Conclusion This meta-analysis study indicates that RYGB is superior to SG in reducing excess FM for patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ and seems to be more beneficial when LTM preservation is taken into consideration. Graphical abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fat mass</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Lean tissue mass</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Meta-analysis</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Roux-en-Y gastric bypass</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sleeve gastrectomy</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhu, Liyong</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhu, Shaihong</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-6209-3132</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Obesity surgery</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY : Springer, 1991</subfield><subfield code="g">32(2022), 5 vom: 16. März, Seite 1658-1666</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)353900508</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2087903-9</subfield><subfield code="x">1708-0428</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:32</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">day:16</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1658-1666</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-06006-y</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">32</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="b">16</subfield><subfield code="c">03</subfield><subfield code="h">1658-1666</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Cui, Beibei |
| spellingShingle |
Cui, Beibei misc Fat mass misc Lean tissue mass misc Meta-analysis misc Roux-en-Y gastric bypass misc Sleeve gastrectomy Effects of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy on Body Composition for Patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ at 1 Year After Surgery |
| authorStr |
Cui, Beibei |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)353900508 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1708-0428 |
| topic_title |
Effects of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy on Body Composition for Patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ at 1 Year After Surgery Fat mass (dpeaa)DE-He213 Lean tissue mass (dpeaa)DE-He213 Meta-analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sleeve gastrectomy (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
misc Fat mass misc Lean tissue mass misc Meta-analysis misc Roux-en-Y gastric bypass misc Sleeve gastrectomy |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Fat mass misc Lean tissue mass misc Meta-analysis misc Roux-en-Y gastric bypass misc Sleeve gastrectomy |
| topic_browse |
misc Fat mass misc Lean tissue mass misc Meta-analysis misc Roux-en-Y gastric bypass misc Sleeve gastrectomy |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Obesity surgery |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
353900508 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Obesity surgery |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)353900508 (DE-600)2087903-9 |
| title |
Effects of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy on Body Composition for Patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ at 1 Year After Surgery |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR046683941 (SPR)s11695-022-06006-y-e |
| title_full |
Effects of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy on Body Composition for Patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ at 1 Year After Surgery |
| author_sort |
Cui, Beibei |
| journal |
Obesity surgery |
| journalStr |
Obesity surgery |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2022 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
1658 |
| author_browse |
Cui, Beibei Zhu, Liyong Zhu, Shaihong |
| container_volume |
32 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Cui, Beibei |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s11695-022-06006-y |
| normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0001-6209-3132 |
| normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0001-6209-3132 |
| title_sort |
effects of roux-en-y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy on body composition for patients with a bmi > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ at 1 year after surgery |
| title_auth |
Effects of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy on Body Composition for Patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ at 1 Year After Surgery |
| abstract |
Purpose Effects of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) versus sleeve gastrectomy (SG) on body composition have not been well compared. This meta-analysis aimed to compare changes in fat mass (FM) and lean tissue mass (LTM) for patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ at 1 year after RYGB and SG. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched ending in December 2021 for eligible studies which reported baseline and postsurgical BMI, FM, and LTM. Results Of 17 eligible studies, 831 patients were included, 484 following RYGB and 347 following SG. Weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were from a random-effects model. For patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $, RYGB resulted in a more substantial reduction of BMI (− 14.13 kg/$ m^{2} $ [95%CI − 14.74, − 13.53] versus − 11.96 kg/$ m^{2} $ [95%CI − 12.81, − 11.11], P < 0.001) and FM (− 26.22 kg [95%CI − 28.31, − 24.12] versus − 21.50 kg [95%CI − 25.52, − 17.48], P = 0.042) than SG, and a relatively weaker impact on LTM (− 8.28 kg [95%CI − 9.33, − 7.22] versus − 10.12 kg [95%CI − 11.55, − 8.68], P = 0.043). Conclusion This meta-analysis study indicates that RYGB is superior to SG in reducing excess FM for patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ and seems to be more beneficial when LTM preservation is taken into consideration. Graphical abstract © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022 |
| abstractGer |
Purpose Effects of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) versus sleeve gastrectomy (SG) on body composition have not been well compared. This meta-analysis aimed to compare changes in fat mass (FM) and lean tissue mass (LTM) for patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ at 1 year after RYGB and SG. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched ending in December 2021 for eligible studies which reported baseline and postsurgical BMI, FM, and LTM. Results Of 17 eligible studies, 831 patients were included, 484 following RYGB and 347 following SG. Weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were from a random-effects model. For patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $, RYGB resulted in a more substantial reduction of BMI (− 14.13 kg/$ m^{2} $ [95%CI − 14.74, − 13.53] versus − 11.96 kg/$ m^{2} $ [95%CI − 12.81, − 11.11], P < 0.001) and FM (− 26.22 kg [95%CI − 28.31, − 24.12] versus − 21.50 kg [95%CI − 25.52, − 17.48], P = 0.042) than SG, and a relatively weaker impact on LTM (− 8.28 kg [95%CI − 9.33, − 7.22] versus − 10.12 kg [95%CI − 11.55, − 8.68], P = 0.043). Conclusion This meta-analysis study indicates that RYGB is superior to SG in reducing excess FM for patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ and seems to be more beneficial when LTM preservation is taken into consideration. Graphical abstract © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Purpose Effects of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) versus sleeve gastrectomy (SG) on body composition have not been well compared. This meta-analysis aimed to compare changes in fat mass (FM) and lean tissue mass (LTM) for patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ at 1 year after RYGB and SG. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched ending in December 2021 for eligible studies which reported baseline and postsurgical BMI, FM, and LTM. Results Of 17 eligible studies, 831 patients were included, 484 following RYGB and 347 following SG. Weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were from a random-effects model. For patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $, RYGB resulted in a more substantial reduction of BMI (− 14.13 kg/$ m^{2} $ [95%CI − 14.74, − 13.53] versus − 11.96 kg/$ m^{2} $ [95%CI − 12.81, − 11.11], P < 0.001) and FM (− 26.22 kg [95%CI − 28.31, − 24.12] versus − 21.50 kg [95%CI − 25.52, − 17.48], P = 0.042) than SG, and a relatively weaker impact on LTM (− 8.28 kg [95%CI − 9.33, − 7.22] versus − 10.12 kg [95%CI − 11.55, − 8.68], P = 0.043). Conclusion This meta-analysis study indicates that RYGB is superior to SG in reducing excess FM for patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ and seems to be more beneficial when LTM preservation is taken into consideration. Graphical abstract © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 |
| container_issue |
5 |
| title_short |
Effects of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy on Body Composition for Patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ at 1 Year After Surgery |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-06006-y |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Zhu, Liyong Zhu, Shaihong |
| author2Str |
Zhu, Liyong Zhu, Shaihong |
| ppnlink |
353900508 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s11695-022-06006-y |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T23:54:27.862Z |
| _version_ |
1803604058832896000 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR046683941</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230507151012.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220407s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11695-022-06006-y</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR046683941</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s11695-022-06006-y-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cui, Beibei</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Effects of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy on Body Composition for Patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ at 1 Year After Surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Purpose Effects of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) versus sleeve gastrectomy (SG) on body composition have not been well compared. This meta-analysis aimed to compare changes in fat mass (FM) and lean tissue mass (LTM) for patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ at 1 year after RYGB and SG. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched ending in December 2021 for eligible studies which reported baseline and postsurgical BMI, FM, and LTM. Results Of 17 eligible studies, 831 patients were included, 484 following RYGB and 347 following SG. Weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were from a random-effects model. For patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $, RYGB resulted in a more substantial reduction of BMI (− 14.13 kg/$ m^{2} $ [95%CI − 14.74, − 13.53] versus − 11.96 kg/$ m^{2} $ [95%CI − 12.81, − 11.11], P < 0.001) and FM (− 26.22 kg [95%CI − 28.31, − 24.12] versus − 21.50 kg [95%CI − 25.52, − 17.48], P = 0.042) than SG, and a relatively weaker impact on LTM (− 8.28 kg [95%CI − 9.33, − 7.22] versus − 10.12 kg [95%CI − 11.55, − 8.68], P = 0.043). Conclusion This meta-analysis study indicates that RYGB is superior to SG in reducing excess FM for patients with a BMI > 35 kg/$ m^{2} $ and seems to be more beneficial when LTM preservation is taken into consideration. Graphical abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fat mass</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Lean tissue mass</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Meta-analysis</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Roux-en-Y gastric bypass</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sleeve gastrectomy</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhu, Liyong</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhu, Shaihong</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-6209-3132</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Obesity surgery</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY : Springer, 1991</subfield><subfield code="g">32(2022), 5 vom: 16. März, Seite 1658-1666</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)353900508</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2087903-9</subfield><subfield code="x">1708-0428</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:32</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">day:16</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1658-1666</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-06006-y</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">32</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="b">16</subfield><subfield code="c">03</subfield><subfield code="h">1658-1666</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.401147 |