Evaluation of a 2D UNet-Based Attenuation Correction Methodology for PET/MR Brain Studies
Abstract Deep learning (DL) strategies applied to magnetic resonance (MR) images in positron emission tomography (PET)/MR can provide synthetic attenuation correction (AC) maps, and consequently PET images, more accurate than segmentation or atlas-registration strategies. As first objective, we aim...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Presotto, Luca [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2022 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Anmerkung: |
© The Author(s) 2022 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Journal of digital imaging - Berlin : Springer, 1988, 35(2022), 3 vom: 28. Jan., Seite 432-445 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:35 ; year:2022 ; number:3 ; day:28 ; month:01 ; pages:432-445 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s10278-021-00551-1 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
SPR047148268 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | SPR047148268 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230507194113.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220601s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10278-021-00551-1 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)SPR047148268 | ||
035 | |a (SPR)s10278-021-00551-1-e | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Presotto, Luca |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Evaluation of a 2D UNet-Based Attenuation Correction Methodology for PET/MR Brain Studies |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © The Author(s) 2022 | ||
520 | |a Abstract Deep learning (DL) strategies applied to magnetic resonance (MR) images in positron emission tomography (PET)/MR can provide synthetic attenuation correction (AC) maps, and consequently PET images, more accurate than segmentation or atlas-registration strategies. As first objective, we aim to investigate the best MR image to be used and the best point of the AC pipeline to insert the synthetic map in. Sixteen patients underwent a 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) and a PET/MR brain study in the same day. PET/CT images were reconstructed with attenuation maps obtained: (1) from CT (reference), (2) from MR with an atlas-based and a segmentation-based method and (3) with a 2D UNet trained on MR image/attenuation map pairs. As for MR, T1-weighted and Zero Time Echo (ZTE) images were considered; as for attenuation maps, CTs and 511 keV low-resolution attenuation maps were assessed. As second objective, we assessed the ability of DL strategies to provide proper AC maps in presence of cranial anatomy alterations due to surgery. Three 11C-methionine (METH) PET/MR studies were considered. PET images were reconstructed with attenuation maps obtained: (1) from diagnostic coregistered CT (reference), (2) from MR with an atlas-based and a segmentation-based method and (3) with 2D UNets trained on the sixteen FDG anatomically normal patients. Only UNets taking ZTE images in input were considered. FDG and METH PET images were quantitatively evaluated. As for anatomically normal FDG patients, UNet AC models generally provide an uptake estimate with lower bias than atlas-based or segmentation-based methods. The intersubject average bias on images corrected with UNet AC maps is always smaller than 1.5%, except for AC maps generated on too coarse grids. The intersubject bias variability is the lowest (always lower than 2%) for UNet AC maps coming from ZTE images, larger for other methods. UNet models working on MR ZTE images and generating synthetic CT or 511 keV low-resolution attenuation maps therefore provide the best results in terms of both accuracy and variability. As for METH anatomically altered patients, DL properly reconstructs anatomical alterations. Quantitative results on PET images confirm those found on anatomically normal FDG patients. | ||
650 | 4 | |a PET/MR |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Brain attenuation correction |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Deep learning |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a UNet |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
700 | 1 | |a Bettinardi, Valentino |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Bagnalasta, Matteo |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Scifo, Paola |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Savi, Annarita |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Vanoli, Emilia Giovanna |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Fallanca, Federico |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Picchio, Maria |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Perani, Daniela |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Gianolli, Luigi |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a De Bernardi, Elisabetta |0 (orcid)0000-0002-8394-0342 |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of digital imaging |d Berlin : Springer, 1988 |g 35(2022), 3 vom: 28. Jan., Seite 432-445 |w (DE-627)34923485X |w (DE-600)2080328-X |x 1618-727X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:35 |g year:2022 |g number:3 |g day:28 |g month:01 |g pages:432-445 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-021-00551-1 |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_101 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_120 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_138 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_150 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_152 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_165 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_171 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_187 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_250 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_267 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_281 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_636 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_711 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2001 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2007 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2008 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2010 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2021 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2026 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2027 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2031 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2038 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2039 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2049 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2050 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2056 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2057 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2059 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2061 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2064 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2065 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2068 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2088 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2093 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2106 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2107 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2108 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2113 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2118 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2119 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2122 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2129 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2143 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2144 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2147 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2148 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2152 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2153 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2188 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2190 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2232 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2336 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2446 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2470 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2472 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2507 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2522 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2548 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4242 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4246 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4251 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4328 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4333 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4334 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4336 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4393 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 35 |j 2022 |e 3 |b 28 |c 01 |h 432-445 |
author_variant |
l p lp v b vb m b mb p s ps a s as e g v eg egv f f ff m p mp d p dp l g lg b e d be bed |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:1618727X:2022----::vlainf2uebsdteutocretomtoooy |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
publishDate |
2022 |
allfields |
10.1007/s10278-021-00551-1 doi (DE-627)SPR047148268 (SPR)s10278-021-00551-1-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Presotto, Luca verfasserin aut Evaluation of a 2D UNet-Based Attenuation Correction Methodology for PET/MR Brain Studies 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2022 Abstract Deep learning (DL) strategies applied to magnetic resonance (MR) images in positron emission tomography (PET)/MR can provide synthetic attenuation correction (AC) maps, and consequently PET images, more accurate than segmentation or atlas-registration strategies. As first objective, we aim to investigate the best MR image to be used and the best point of the AC pipeline to insert the synthetic map in. Sixteen patients underwent a 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) and a PET/MR brain study in the same day. PET/CT images were reconstructed with attenuation maps obtained: (1) from CT (reference), (2) from MR with an atlas-based and a segmentation-based method and (3) with a 2D UNet trained on MR image/attenuation map pairs. As for MR, T1-weighted and Zero Time Echo (ZTE) images were considered; as for attenuation maps, CTs and 511 keV low-resolution attenuation maps were assessed. As second objective, we assessed the ability of DL strategies to provide proper AC maps in presence of cranial anatomy alterations due to surgery. Three 11C-methionine (METH) PET/MR studies were considered. PET images were reconstructed with attenuation maps obtained: (1) from diagnostic coregistered CT (reference), (2) from MR with an atlas-based and a segmentation-based method and (3) with 2D UNets trained on the sixteen FDG anatomically normal patients. Only UNets taking ZTE images in input were considered. FDG and METH PET images were quantitatively evaluated. As for anatomically normal FDG patients, UNet AC models generally provide an uptake estimate with lower bias than atlas-based or segmentation-based methods. The intersubject average bias on images corrected with UNet AC maps is always smaller than 1.5%, except for AC maps generated on too coarse grids. The intersubject bias variability is the lowest (always lower than 2%) for UNet AC maps coming from ZTE images, larger for other methods. UNet models working on MR ZTE images and generating synthetic CT or 511 keV low-resolution attenuation maps therefore provide the best results in terms of both accuracy and variability. As for METH anatomically altered patients, DL properly reconstructs anatomical alterations. Quantitative results on PET images confirm those found on anatomically normal FDG patients. PET/MR (dpeaa)DE-He213 Brain attenuation correction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Deep learning (dpeaa)DE-He213 UNet (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bettinardi, Valentino aut Bagnalasta, Matteo aut Scifo, Paola aut Savi, Annarita aut Vanoli, Emilia Giovanna aut Fallanca, Federico aut Picchio, Maria aut Perani, Daniela aut Gianolli, Luigi aut De Bernardi, Elisabetta (orcid)0000-0002-8394-0342 aut Enthalten in Journal of digital imaging Berlin : Springer, 1988 35(2022), 3 vom: 28. Jan., Seite 432-445 (DE-627)34923485X (DE-600)2080328-X 1618-727X nnns volume:35 year:2022 number:3 day:28 month:01 pages:432-445 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-021-00551-1 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_165 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_711 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 35 2022 3 28 01 432-445 |
spelling |
10.1007/s10278-021-00551-1 doi (DE-627)SPR047148268 (SPR)s10278-021-00551-1-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Presotto, Luca verfasserin aut Evaluation of a 2D UNet-Based Attenuation Correction Methodology for PET/MR Brain Studies 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2022 Abstract Deep learning (DL) strategies applied to magnetic resonance (MR) images in positron emission tomography (PET)/MR can provide synthetic attenuation correction (AC) maps, and consequently PET images, more accurate than segmentation or atlas-registration strategies. As first objective, we aim to investigate the best MR image to be used and the best point of the AC pipeline to insert the synthetic map in. Sixteen patients underwent a 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) and a PET/MR brain study in the same day. PET/CT images were reconstructed with attenuation maps obtained: (1) from CT (reference), (2) from MR with an atlas-based and a segmentation-based method and (3) with a 2D UNet trained on MR image/attenuation map pairs. As for MR, T1-weighted and Zero Time Echo (ZTE) images were considered; as for attenuation maps, CTs and 511 keV low-resolution attenuation maps were assessed. As second objective, we assessed the ability of DL strategies to provide proper AC maps in presence of cranial anatomy alterations due to surgery. Three 11C-methionine (METH) PET/MR studies were considered. PET images were reconstructed with attenuation maps obtained: (1) from diagnostic coregistered CT (reference), (2) from MR with an atlas-based and a segmentation-based method and (3) with 2D UNets trained on the sixteen FDG anatomically normal patients. Only UNets taking ZTE images in input were considered. FDG and METH PET images were quantitatively evaluated. As for anatomically normal FDG patients, UNet AC models generally provide an uptake estimate with lower bias than atlas-based or segmentation-based methods. The intersubject average bias on images corrected with UNet AC maps is always smaller than 1.5%, except for AC maps generated on too coarse grids. The intersubject bias variability is the lowest (always lower than 2%) for UNet AC maps coming from ZTE images, larger for other methods. UNet models working on MR ZTE images and generating synthetic CT or 511 keV low-resolution attenuation maps therefore provide the best results in terms of both accuracy and variability. As for METH anatomically altered patients, DL properly reconstructs anatomical alterations. Quantitative results on PET images confirm those found on anatomically normal FDG patients. PET/MR (dpeaa)DE-He213 Brain attenuation correction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Deep learning (dpeaa)DE-He213 UNet (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bettinardi, Valentino aut Bagnalasta, Matteo aut Scifo, Paola aut Savi, Annarita aut Vanoli, Emilia Giovanna aut Fallanca, Federico aut Picchio, Maria aut Perani, Daniela aut Gianolli, Luigi aut De Bernardi, Elisabetta (orcid)0000-0002-8394-0342 aut Enthalten in Journal of digital imaging Berlin : Springer, 1988 35(2022), 3 vom: 28. Jan., Seite 432-445 (DE-627)34923485X (DE-600)2080328-X 1618-727X nnns volume:35 year:2022 number:3 day:28 month:01 pages:432-445 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-021-00551-1 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_165 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_711 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 35 2022 3 28 01 432-445 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s10278-021-00551-1 doi (DE-627)SPR047148268 (SPR)s10278-021-00551-1-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Presotto, Luca verfasserin aut Evaluation of a 2D UNet-Based Attenuation Correction Methodology for PET/MR Brain Studies 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2022 Abstract Deep learning (DL) strategies applied to magnetic resonance (MR) images in positron emission tomography (PET)/MR can provide synthetic attenuation correction (AC) maps, and consequently PET images, more accurate than segmentation or atlas-registration strategies. As first objective, we aim to investigate the best MR image to be used and the best point of the AC pipeline to insert the synthetic map in. Sixteen patients underwent a 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) and a PET/MR brain study in the same day. PET/CT images were reconstructed with attenuation maps obtained: (1) from CT (reference), (2) from MR with an atlas-based and a segmentation-based method and (3) with a 2D UNet trained on MR image/attenuation map pairs. As for MR, T1-weighted and Zero Time Echo (ZTE) images were considered; as for attenuation maps, CTs and 511 keV low-resolution attenuation maps were assessed. As second objective, we assessed the ability of DL strategies to provide proper AC maps in presence of cranial anatomy alterations due to surgery. Three 11C-methionine (METH) PET/MR studies were considered. PET images were reconstructed with attenuation maps obtained: (1) from diagnostic coregistered CT (reference), (2) from MR with an atlas-based and a segmentation-based method and (3) with 2D UNets trained on the sixteen FDG anatomically normal patients. Only UNets taking ZTE images in input were considered. FDG and METH PET images were quantitatively evaluated. As for anatomically normal FDG patients, UNet AC models generally provide an uptake estimate with lower bias than atlas-based or segmentation-based methods. The intersubject average bias on images corrected with UNet AC maps is always smaller than 1.5%, except for AC maps generated on too coarse grids. The intersubject bias variability is the lowest (always lower than 2%) for UNet AC maps coming from ZTE images, larger for other methods. UNet models working on MR ZTE images and generating synthetic CT or 511 keV low-resolution attenuation maps therefore provide the best results in terms of both accuracy and variability. As for METH anatomically altered patients, DL properly reconstructs anatomical alterations. Quantitative results on PET images confirm those found on anatomically normal FDG patients. PET/MR (dpeaa)DE-He213 Brain attenuation correction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Deep learning (dpeaa)DE-He213 UNet (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bettinardi, Valentino aut Bagnalasta, Matteo aut Scifo, Paola aut Savi, Annarita aut Vanoli, Emilia Giovanna aut Fallanca, Federico aut Picchio, Maria aut Perani, Daniela aut Gianolli, Luigi aut De Bernardi, Elisabetta (orcid)0000-0002-8394-0342 aut Enthalten in Journal of digital imaging Berlin : Springer, 1988 35(2022), 3 vom: 28. Jan., Seite 432-445 (DE-627)34923485X (DE-600)2080328-X 1618-727X nnns volume:35 year:2022 number:3 day:28 month:01 pages:432-445 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-021-00551-1 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_165 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_711 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 35 2022 3 28 01 432-445 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s10278-021-00551-1 doi (DE-627)SPR047148268 (SPR)s10278-021-00551-1-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Presotto, Luca verfasserin aut Evaluation of a 2D UNet-Based Attenuation Correction Methodology for PET/MR Brain Studies 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2022 Abstract Deep learning (DL) strategies applied to magnetic resonance (MR) images in positron emission tomography (PET)/MR can provide synthetic attenuation correction (AC) maps, and consequently PET images, more accurate than segmentation or atlas-registration strategies. As first objective, we aim to investigate the best MR image to be used and the best point of the AC pipeline to insert the synthetic map in. Sixteen patients underwent a 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) and a PET/MR brain study in the same day. PET/CT images were reconstructed with attenuation maps obtained: (1) from CT (reference), (2) from MR with an atlas-based and a segmentation-based method and (3) with a 2D UNet trained on MR image/attenuation map pairs. As for MR, T1-weighted and Zero Time Echo (ZTE) images were considered; as for attenuation maps, CTs and 511 keV low-resolution attenuation maps were assessed. As second objective, we assessed the ability of DL strategies to provide proper AC maps in presence of cranial anatomy alterations due to surgery. Three 11C-methionine (METH) PET/MR studies were considered. PET images were reconstructed with attenuation maps obtained: (1) from diagnostic coregistered CT (reference), (2) from MR with an atlas-based and a segmentation-based method and (3) with 2D UNets trained on the sixteen FDG anatomically normal patients. Only UNets taking ZTE images in input were considered. FDG and METH PET images were quantitatively evaluated. As for anatomically normal FDG patients, UNet AC models generally provide an uptake estimate with lower bias than atlas-based or segmentation-based methods. The intersubject average bias on images corrected with UNet AC maps is always smaller than 1.5%, except for AC maps generated on too coarse grids. The intersubject bias variability is the lowest (always lower than 2%) for UNet AC maps coming from ZTE images, larger for other methods. UNet models working on MR ZTE images and generating synthetic CT or 511 keV low-resolution attenuation maps therefore provide the best results in terms of both accuracy and variability. As for METH anatomically altered patients, DL properly reconstructs anatomical alterations. Quantitative results on PET images confirm those found on anatomically normal FDG patients. PET/MR (dpeaa)DE-He213 Brain attenuation correction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Deep learning (dpeaa)DE-He213 UNet (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bettinardi, Valentino aut Bagnalasta, Matteo aut Scifo, Paola aut Savi, Annarita aut Vanoli, Emilia Giovanna aut Fallanca, Federico aut Picchio, Maria aut Perani, Daniela aut Gianolli, Luigi aut De Bernardi, Elisabetta (orcid)0000-0002-8394-0342 aut Enthalten in Journal of digital imaging Berlin : Springer, 1988 35(2022), 3 vom: 28. Jan., Seite 432-445 (DE-627)34923485X (DE-600)2080328-X 1618-727X nnns volume:35 year:2022 number:3 day:28 month:01 pages:432-445 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-021-00551-1 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_165 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_711 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 35 2022 3 28 01 432-445 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s10278-021-00551-1 doi (DE-627)SPR047148268 (SPR)s10278-021-00551-1-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Presotto, Luca verfasserin aut Evaluation of a 2D UNet-Based Attenuation Correction Methodology for PET/MR Brain Studies 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2022 Abstract Deep learning (DL) strategies applied to magnetic resonance (MR) images in positron emission tomography (PET)/MR can provide synthetic attenuation correction (AC) maps, and consequently PET images, more accurate than segmentation or atlas-registration strategies. As first objective, we aim to investigate the best MR image to be used and the best point of the AC pipeline to insert the synthetic map in. Sixteen patients underwent a 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) and a PET/MR brain study in the same day. PET/CT images were reconstructed with attenuation maps obtained: (1) from CT (reference), (2) from MR with an atlas-based and a segmentation-based method and (3) with a 2D UNet trained on MR image/attenuation map pairs. As for MR, T1-weighted and Zero Time Echo (ZTE) images were considered; as for attenuation maps, CTs and 511 keV low-resolution attenuation maps were assessed. As second objective, we assessed the ability of DL strategies to provide proper AC maps in presence of cranial anatomy alterations due to surgery. Three 11C-methionine (METH) PET/MR studies were considered. PET images were reconstructed with attenuation maps obtained: (1) from diagnostic coregistered CT (reference), (2) from MR with an atlas-based and a segmentation-based method and (3) with 2D UNets trained on the sixteen FDG anatomically normal patients. Only UNets taking ZTE images in input were considered. FDG and METH PET images were quantitatively evaluated. As for anatomically normal FDG patients, UNet AC models generally provide an uptake estimate with lower bias than atlas-based or segmentation-based methods. The intersubject average bias on images corrected with UNet AC maps is always smaller than 1.5%, except for AC maps generated on too coarse grids. The intersubject bias variability is the lowest (always lower than 2%) for UNet AC maps coming from ZTE images, larger for other methods. UNet models working on MR ZTE images and generating synthetic CT or 511 keV low-resolution attenuation maps therefore provide the best results in terms of both accuracy and variability. As for METH anatomically altered patients, DL properly reconstructs anatomical alterations. Quantitative results on PET images confirm those found on anatomically normal FDG patients. PET/MR (dpeaa)DE-He213 Brain attenuation correction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Deep learning (dpeaa)DE-He213 UNet (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bettinardi, Valentino aut Bagnalasta, Matteo aut Scifo, Paola aut Savi, Annarita aut Vanoli, Emilia Giovanna aut Fallanca, Federico aut Picchio, Maria aut Perani, Daniela aut Gianolli, Luigi aut De Bernardi, Elisabetta (orcid)0000-0002-8394-0342 aut Enthalten in Journal of digital imaging Berlin : Springer, 1988 35(2022), 3 vom: 28. Jan., Seite 432-445 (DE-627)34923485X (DE-600)2080328-X 1618-727X nnns volume:35 year:2022 number:3 day:28 month:01 pages:432-445 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-021-00551-1 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_165 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_711 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 35 2022 3 28 01 432-445 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Journal of digital imaging 35(2022), 3 vom: 28. Jan., Seite 432-445 volume:35 year:2022 number:3 day:28 month:01 pages:432-445 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Journal of digital imaging 35(2022), 3 vom: 28. Jan., Seite 432-445 volume:35 year:2022 number:3 day:28 month:01 pages:432-445 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
PET/MR Brain attenuation correction Deep learning UNet |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Journal of digital imaging |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Presotto, Luca @@aut@@ Bettinardi, Valentino @@aut@@ Bagnalasta, Matteo @@aut@@ Scifo, Paola @@aut@@ Savi, Annarita @@aut@@ Vanoli, Emilia Giovanna @@aut@@ Fallanca, Federico @@aut@@ Picchio, Maria @@aut@@ Perani, Daniela @@aut@@ Gianolli, Luigi @@aut@@ De Bernardi, Elisabetta @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-28T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
34923485X |
id |
SPR047148268 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR047148268</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230507194113.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220601s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10278-021-00551-1</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR047148268</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s10278-021-00551-1-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Presotto, Luca</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluation of a 2D UNet-Based Attenuation Correction Methodology for PET/MR Brain Studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Deep learning (DL) strategies applied to magnetic resonance (MR) images in positron emission tomography (PET)/MR can provide synthetic attenuation correction (AC) maps, and consequently PET images, more accurate than segmentation or atlas-registration strategies. As first objective, we aim to investigate the best MR image to be used and the best point of the AC pipeline to insert the synthetic map in. Sixteen patients underwent a 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) and a PET/MR brain study in the same day. PET/CT images were reconstructed with attenuation maps obtained: (1) from CT (reference), (2) from MR with an atlas-based and a segmentation-based method and (3) with a 2D UNet trained on MR image/attenuation map pairs. As for MR, T1-weighted and Zero Time Echo (ZTE) images were considered; as for attenuation maps, CTs and 511 keV low-resolution attenuation maps were assessed. As second objective, we assessed the ability of DL strategies to provide proper AC maps in presence of cranial anatomy alterations due to surgery. Three 11C-methionine (METH) PET/MR studies were considered. PET images were reconstructed with attenuation maps obtained: (1) from diagnostic coregistered CT (reference), (2) from MR with an atlas-based and a segmentation-based method and (3) with 2D UNets trained on the sixteen FDG anatomically normal patients. Only UNets taking ZTE images in input were considered. FDG and METH PET images were quantitatively evaluated. As for anatomically normal FDG patients, UNet AC models generally provide an uptake estimate with lower bias than atlas-based or segmentation-based methods. The intersubject average bias on images corrected with UNet AC maps is always smaller than 1.5%, except for AC maps generated on too coarse grids. The intersubject bias variability is the lowest (always lower than 2%) for UNet AC maps coming from ZTE images, larger for other methods. UNet models working on MR ZTE images and generating synthetic CT or 511 keV low-resolution attenuation maps therefore provide the best results in terms of both accuracy and variability. As for METH anatomically altered patients, DL properly reconstructs anatomical alterations. Quantitative results on PET images confirm those found on anatomically normal FDG patients.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">PET/MR</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Brain attenuation correction</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Deep learning</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">UNet</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bettinardi, Valentino</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bagnalasta, Matteo</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Scifo, Paola</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Savi, Annarita</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vanoli, Emilia Giovanna</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fallanca, Federico</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Picchio, Maria</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Perani, Daniela</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gianolli, Luigi</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">De Bernardi, Elisabetta</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-8394-0342</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of digital imaging</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : Springer, 1988</subfield><subfield code="g">35(2022), 3 vom: 28. Jan., Seite 432-445</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)34923485X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2080328-X</subfield><subfield code="x">1618-727X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:35</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:28</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:432-445</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-021-00551-1</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_165</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_711</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">35</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">28</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield><subfield code="h">432-445</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Presotto, Luca |
spellingShingle |
Presotto, Luca misc PET/MR misc Brain attenuation correction misc Deep learning misc UNet Evaluation of a 2D UNet-Based Attenuation Correction Methodology for PET/MR Brain Studies |
authorStr |
Presotto, Luca |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)34923485X |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
springer |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1618-727X |
topic_title |
Evaluation of a 2D UNet-Based Attenuation Correction Methodology for PET/MR Brain Studies PET/MR (dpeaa)DE-He213 Brain attenuation correction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Deep learning (dpeaa)DE-He213 UNet (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
topic |
misc PET/MR misc Brain attenuation correction misc Deep learning misc UNet |
topic_unstemmed |
misc PET/MR misc Brain attenuation correction misc Deep learning misc UNet |
topic_browse |
misc PET/MR misc Brain attenuation correction misc Deep learning misc UNet |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of digital imaging |
hierarchy_parent_id |
34923485X |
hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of digital imaging |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)34923485X (DE-600)2080328-X |
title |
Evaluation of a 2D UNet-Based Attenuation Correction Methodology for PET/MR Brain Studies |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR047148268 (SPR)s10278-021-00551-1-e |
title_full |
Evaluation of a 2D UNet-Based Attenuation Correction Methodology for PET/MR Brain Studies |
author_sort |
Presotto, Luca |
journal |
Journal of digital imaging |
journalStr |
Journal of digital imaging |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2022 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
432 |
author_browse |
Presotto, Luca Bettinardi, Valentino Bagnalasta, Matteo Scifo, Paola Savi, Annarita Vanoli, Emilia Giovanna Fallanca, Federico Picchio, Maria Perani, Daniela Gianolli, Luigi De Bernardi, Elisabetta |
container_volume |
35 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Presotto, Luca |
doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s10278-021-00551-1 |
normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0002-8394-0342 |
normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0002-8394-0342 |
title_sort |
evaluation of a 2d unet-based attenuation correction methodology for pet/mr brain studies |
title_auth |
Evaluation of a 2D UNet-Based Attenuation Correction Methodology for PET/MR Brain Studies |
abstract |
Abstract Deep learning (DL) strategies applied to magnetic resonance (MR) images in positron emission tomography (PET)/MR can provide synthetic attenuation correction (AC) maps, and consequently PET images, more accurate than segmentation or atlas-registration strategies. As first objective, we aim to investigate the best MR image to be used and the best point of the AC pipeline to insert the synthetic map in. Sixteen patients underwent a 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) and a PET/MR brain study in the same day. PET/CT images were reconstructed with attenuation maps obtained: (1) from CT (reference), (2) from MR with an atlas-based and a segmentation-based method and (3) with a 2D UNet trained on MR image/attenuation map pairs. As for MR, T1-weighted and Zero Time Echo (ZTE) images were considered; as for attenuation maps, CTs and 511 keV low-resolution attenuation maps were assessed. As second objective, we assessed the ability of DL strategies to provide proper AC maps in presence of cranial anatomy alterations due to surgery. Three 11C-methionine (METH) PET/MR studies were considered. PET images were reconstructed with attenuation maps obtained: (1) from diagnostic coregistered CT (reference), (2) from MR with an atlas-based and a segmentation-based method and (3) with 2D UNets trained on the sixteen FDG anatomically normal patients. Only UNets taking ZTE images in input were considered. FDG and METH PET images were quantitatively evaluated. As for anatomically normal FDG patients, UNet AC models generally provide an uptake estimate with lower bias than atlas-based or segmentation-based methods. The intersubject average bias on images corrected with UNet AC maps is always smaller than 1.5%, except for AC maps generated on too coarse grids. The intersubject bias variability is the lowest (always lower than 2%) for UNet AC maps coming from ZTE images, larger for other methods. UNet models working on MR ZTE images and generating synthetic CT or 511 keV low-resolution attenuation maps therefore provide the best results in terms of both accuracy and variability. As for METH anatomically altered patients, DL properly reconstructs anatomical alterations. Quantitative results on PET images confirm those found on anatomically normal FDG patients. © The Author(s) 2022 |
abstractGer |
Abstract Deep learning (DL) strategies applied to magnetic resonance (MR) images in positron emission tomography (PET)/MR can provide synthetic attenuation correction (AC) maps, and consequently PET images, more accurate than segmentation or atlas-registration strategies. As first objective, we aim to investigate the best MR image to be used and the best point of the AC pipeline to insert the synthetic map in. Sixteen patients underwent a 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) and a PET/MR brain study in the same day. PET/CT images were reconstructed with attenuation maps obtained: (1) from CT (reference), (2) from MR with an atlas-based and a segmentation-based method and (3) with a 2D UNet trained on MR image/attenuation map pairs. As for MR, T1-weighted and Zero Time Echo (ZTE) images were considered; as for attenuation maps, CTs and 511 keV low-resolution attenuation maps were assessed. As second objective, we assessed the ability of DL strategies to provide proper AC maps in presence of cranial anatomy alterations due to surgery. Three 11C-methionine (METH) PET/MR studies were considered. PET images were reconstructed with attenuation maps obtained: (1) from diagnostic coregistered CT (reference), (2) from MR with an atlas-based and a segmentation-based method and (3) with 2D UNets trained on the sixteen FDG anatomically normal patients. Only UNets taking ZTE images in input were considered. FDG and METH PET images were quantitatively evaluated. As for anatomically normal FDG patients, UNet AC models generally provide an uptake estimate with lower bias than atlas-based or segmentation-based methods. The intersubject average bias on images corrected with UNet AC maps is always smaller than 1.5%, except for AC maps generated on too coarse grids. The intersubject bias variability is the lowest (always lower than 2%) for UNet AC maps coming from ZTE images, larger for other methods. UNet models working on MR ZTE images and generating synthetic CT or 511 keV low-resolution attenuation maps therefore provide the best results in terms of both accuracy and variability. As for METH anatomically altered patients, DL properly reconstructs anatomical alterations. Quantitative results on PET images confirm those found on anatomically normal FDG patients. © The Author(s) 2022 |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Deep learning (DL) strategies applied to magnetic resonance (MR) images in positron emission tomography (PET)/MR can provide synthetic attenuation correction (AC) maps, and consequently PET images, more accurate than segmentation or atlas-registration strategies. As first objective, we aim to investigate the best MR image to be used and the best point of the AC pipeline to insert the synthetic map in. Sixteen patients underwent a 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) and a PET/MR brain study in the same day. PET/CT images were reconstructed with attenuation maps obtained: (1) from CT (reference), (2) from MR with an atlas-based and a segmentation-based method and (3) with a 2D UNet trained on MR image/attenuation map pairs. As for MR, T1-weighted and Zero Time Echo (ZTE) images were considered; as for attenuation maps, CTs and 511 keV low-resolution attenuation maps were assessed. As second objective, we assessed the ability of DL strategies to provide proper AC maps in presence of cranial anatomy alterations due to surgery. Three 11C-methionine (METH) PET/MR studies were considered. PET images were reconstructed with attenuation maps obtained: (1) from diagnostic coregistered CT (reference), (2) from MR with an atlas-based and a segmentation-based method and (3) with 2D UNets trained on the sixteen FDG anatomically normal patients. Only UNets taking ZTE images in input were considered. FDG and METH PET images were quantitatively evaluated. As for anatomically normal FDG patients, UNet AC models generally provide an uptake estimate with lower bias than atlas-based or segmentation-based methods. The intersubject average bias on images corrected with UNet AC maps is always smaller than 1.5%, except for AC maps generated on too coarse grids. The intersubject bias variability is the lowest (always lower than 2%) for UNet AC maps coming from ZTE images, larger for other methods. UNet models working on MR ZTE images and generating synthetic CT or 511 keV low-resolution attenuation maps therefore provide the best results in terms of both accuracy and variability. As for METH anatomically altered patients, DL properly reconstructs anatomical alterations. Quantitative results on PET images confirm those found on anatomically normal FDG patients. © The Author(s) 2022 |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_165 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_711 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
3 |
title_short |
Evaluation of a 2D UNet-Based Attenuation Correction Methodology for PET/MR Brain Studies |
url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-021-00551-1 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Bettinardi, Valentino Bagnalasta, Matteo Scifo, Paola Savi, Annarita Vanoli, Emilia Giovanna Fallanca, Federico Picchio, Maria Perani, Daniela Gianolli, Luigi De Bernardi, Elisabetta |
author2Str |
Bettinardi, Valentino Bagnalasta, Matteo Scifo, Paola Savi, Annarita Vanoli, Emilia Giovanna Fallanca, Federico Picchio, Maria Perani, Daniela Gianolli, Luigi De Bernardi, Elisabetta |
ppnlink |
34923485X |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1007/s10278-021-00551-1 |
up_date |
2024-07-04T02:04:06.349Z |
_version_ |
1803612215157194752 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR047148268</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230507194113.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220601s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10278-021-00551-1</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR047148268</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s10278-021-00551-1-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Presotto, Luca</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluation of a 2D UNet-Based Attenuation Correction Methodology for PET/MR Brain Studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Deep learning (DL) strategies applied to magnetic resonance (MR) images in positron emission tomography (PET)/MR can provide synthetic attenuation correction (AC) maps, and consequently PET images, more accurate than segmentation or atlas-registration strategies. As first objective, we aim to investigate the best MR image to be used and the best point of the AC pipeline to insert the synthetic map in. Sixteen patients underwent a 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) and a PET/MR brain study in the same day. PET/CT images were reconstructed with attenuation maps obtained: (1) from CT (reference), (2) from MR with an atlas-based and a segmentation-based method and (3) with a 2D UNet trained on MR image/attenuation map pairs. As for MR, T1-weighted and Zero Time Echo (ZTE) images were considered; as for attenuation maps, CTs and 511 keV low-resolution attenuation maps were assessed. As second objective, we assessed the ability of DL strategies to provide proper AC maps in presence of cranial anatomy alterations due to surgery. Three 11C-methionine (METH) PET/MR studies were considered. PET images were reconstructed with attenuation maps obtained: (1) from diagnostic coregistered CT (reference), (2) from MR with an atlas-based and a segmentation-based method and (3) with 2D UNets trained on the sixteen FDG anatomically normal patients. Only UNets taking ZTE images in input were considered. FDG and METH PET images were quantitatively evaluated. As for anatomically normal FDG patients, UNet AC models generally provide an uptake estimate with lower bias than atlas-based or segmentation-based methods. The intersubject average bias on images corrected with UNet AC maps is always smaller than 1.5%, except for AC maps generated on too coarse grids. The intersubject bias variability is the lowest (always lower than 2%) for UNet AC maps coming from ZTE images, larger for other methods. UNet models working on MR ZTE images and generating synthetic CT or 511 keV low-resolution attenuation maps therefore provide the best results in terms of both accuracy and variability. As for METH anatomically altered patients, DL properly reconstructs anatomical alterations. Quantitative results on PET images confirm those found on anatomically normal FDG patients.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">PET/MR</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Brain attenuation correction</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Deep learning</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">UNet</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bettinardi, Valentino</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bagnalasta, Matteo</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Scifo, Paola</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Savi, Annarita</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vanoli, Emilia Giovanna</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fallanca, Federico</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Picchio, Maria</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Perani, Daniela</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gianolli, Luigi</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">De Bernardi, Elisabetta</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-8394-0342</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of digital imaging</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : Springer, 1988</subfield><subfield code="g">35(2022), 3 vom: 28. Jan., Seite 432-445</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)34923485X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2080328-X</subfield><subfield code="x">1618-727X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:35</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:28</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:432-445</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-021-00551-1</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_165</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_711</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">35</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">28</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield><subfield code="h">432-445</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.401165 |