Introducing of a Method for Assessment of Difficulty of Firefighting Operation for Full Surface Atmospheric Storage Tanks Fires
Abstract Atmospheric tank fire incidents demand a considerable amount of logistics and planning support and serious response operation. Tank fire incidents challenge response teams and usually are difficult to manage. Some organizations have several atmospheric tanks, and they need to select the wor...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Azizinejad, Mahsa [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© ASM International 2022 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Practical failure analysis - Springer New York, 2001, 22(2022), 3 vom: 23. Mai, Seite 1293-1307 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:22 ; year:2022 ; number:3 ; day:23 ; month:05 ; pages:1293-1307 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s11668-022-01411-y |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR047213981 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR047213981 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230509102423.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220608s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11668-022-01411-y |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR047213981 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)s11668-022-01411-y-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Azizinejad, Mahsa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Introducing of a Method for Assessment of Difficulty of Firefighting Operation for Full Surface Atmospheric Storage Tanks Fires |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © ASM International 2022 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Atmospheric tank fire incidents demand a considerable amount of logistics and planning support and serious response operation. Tank fire incidents challenge response teams and usually are difficult to manage. Some organizations have several atmospheric tanks, and they need to select the worse scenarios to pre-plan. Therefore, it is necessary to develop some tools to select the most difficult tanks fires scenarios. First, the factors affecting the firefighting operation of atmospheric tanks were identified through reviewing available scientific sources, and then, these factors were divided into four groups: tank-related, response team-related, tank peripheral, and logistic factors. Then, the selected factors were finalized with the opinion of experts and weighed by Chang’s Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP) method. The results of the study showed that among the influential factors in tank fire extinguishing management, “pre-incident planning (PIP)” (weighing 0.14551), “use of incident command system structure in response” (weighing 0.14549), “distance to adjacent tanks and facilities (domino potential)” (weighing 0.14451), “knowledge and experience” (weighing 0.14371), and “bund wall standard and integrity” (0.1443) have the most impact, respectively. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Atmospheric storage tanks |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Emergency response |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Tank firefighting operations |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Fuzzy approach |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Tank fire |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Aliabadi, Mostafa Mirzaei |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kalatpour, Omid |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Practical failure analysis |d Springer New York, 2001 |g 22(2022), 3 vom: 23. Mai, Seite 1293-1307 |w (DE-627)886125871 |w (DE-600)2893589-5 |x 5555-1313 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:22 |g year:2022 |g number:3 |g day:23 |g month:05 |g pages:1293-1307 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11668-022-01411-y |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 22 |j 2022 |e 3 |b 23 |c 05 |h 1293-1307 | ||
| author_variant |
m a ma m m a mm mma o k ok |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:55551313:2022----::nrdcnoaehdoassmnodfiutofrfgtnoeainoflsra |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s11668-022-01411-y doi (DE-627)SPR047213981 (SPR)s11668-022-01411-y-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Azizinejad, Mahsa verfasserin aut Introducing of a Method for Assessment of Difficulty of Firefighting Operation for Full Surface Atmospheric Storage Tanks Fires 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © ASM International 2022 Abstract Atmospheric tank fire incidents demand a considerable amount of logistics and planning support and serious response operation. Tank fire incidents challenge response teams and usually are difficult to manage. Some organizations have several atmospheric tanks, and they need to select the worse scenarios to pre-plan. Therefore, it is necessary to develop some tools to select the most difficult tanks fires scenarios. First, the factors affecting the firefighting operation of atmospheric tanks were identified through reviewing available scientific sources, and then, these factors were divided into four groups: tank-related, response team-related, tank peripheral, and logistic factors. Then, the selected factors were finalized with the opinion of experts and weighed by Chang’s Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP) method. The results of the study showed that among the influential factors in tank fire extinguishing management, “pre-incident planning (PIP)” (weighing 0.14551), “use of incident command system structure in response” (weighing 0.14549), “distance to adjacent tanks and facilities (domino potential)” (weighing 0.14451), “knowledge and experience” (weighing 0.14371), and “bund wall standard and integrity” (0.1443) have the most impact, respectively. Atmospheric storage tanks (dpeaa)DE-He213 Emergency response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Tank firefighting operations (dpeaa)DE-He213 Fuzzy approach (dpeaa)DE-He213 Tank fire (dpeaa)DE-He213 Aliabadi, Mostafa Mirzaei aut Kalatpour, Omid aut Enthalten in Practical failure analysis Springer New York, 2001 22(2022), 3 vom: 23. Mai, Seite 1293-1307 (DE-627)886125871 (DE-600)2893589-5 5555-1313 nnns volume:22 year:2022 number:3 day:23 month:05 pages:1293-1307 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11668-022-01411-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 22 2022 3 23 05 1293-1307 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s11668-022-01411-y doi (DE-627)SPR047213981 (SPR)s11668-022-01411-y-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Azizinejad, Mahsa verfasserin aut Introducing of a Method for Assessment of Difficulty of Firefighting Operation for Full Surface Atmospheric Storage Tanks Fires 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © ASM International 2022 Abstract Atmospheric tank fire incidents demand a considerable amount of logistics and planning support and serious response operation. Tank fire incidents challenge response teams and usually are difficult to manage. Some organizations have several atmospheric tanks, and they need to select the worse scenarios to pre-plan. Therefore, it is necessary to develop some tools to select the most difficult tanks fires scenarios. First, the factors affecting the firefighting operation of atmospheric tanks were identified through reviewing available scientific sources, and then, these factors were divided into four groups: tank-related, response team-related, tank peripheral, and logistic factors. Then, the selected factors were finalized with the opinion of experts and weighed by Chang’s Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP) method. The results of the study showed that among the influential factors in tank fire extinguishing management, “pre-incident planning (PIP)” (weighing 0.14551), “use of incident command system structure in response” (weighing 0.14549), “distance to adjacent tanks and facilities (domino potential)” (weighing 0.14451), “knowledge and experience” (weighing 0.14371), and “bund wall standard and integrity” (0.1443) have the most impact, respectively. Atmospheric storage tanks (dpeaa)DE-He213 Emergency response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Tank firefighting operations (dpeaa)DE-He213 Fuzzy approach (dpeaa)DE-He213 Tank fire (dpeaa)DE-He213 Aliabadi, Mostafa Mirzaei aut Kalatpour, Omid aut Enthalten in Practical failure analysis Springer New York, 2001 22(2022), 3 vom: 23. Mai, Seite 1293-1307 (DE-627)886125871 (DE-600)2893589-5 5555-1313 nnns volume:22 year:2022 number:3 day:23 month:05 pages:1293-1307 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11668-022-01411-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 22 2022 3 23 05 1293-1307 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s11668-022-01411-y doi (DE-627)SPR047213981 (SPR)s11668-022-01411-y-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Azizinejad, Mahsa verfasserin aut Introducing of a Method for Assessment of Difficulty of Firefighting Operation for Full Surface Atmospheric Storage Tanks Fires 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © ASM International 2022 Abstract Atmospheric tank fire incidents demand a considerable amount of logistics and planning support and serious response operation. Tank fire incidents challenge response teams and usually are difficult to manage. Some organizations have several atmospheric tanks, and they need to select the worse scenarios to pre-plan. Therefore, it is necessary to develop some tools to select the most difficult tanks fires scenarios. First, the factors affecting the firefighting operation of atmospheric tanks were identified through reviewing available scientific sources, and then, these factors were divided into four groups: tank-related, response team-related, tank peripheral, and logistic factors. Then, the selected factors were finalized with the opinion of experts and weighed by Chang’s Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP) method. The results of the study showed that among the influential factors in tank fire extinguishing management, “pre-incident planning (PIP)” (weighing 0.14551), “use of incident command system structure in response” (weighing 0.14549), “distance to adjacent tanks and facilities (domino potential)” (weighing 0.14451), “knowledge and experience” (weighing 0.14371), and “bund wall standard and integrity” (0.1443) have the most impact, respectively. Atmospheric storage tanks (dpeaa)DE-He213 Emergency response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Tank firefighting operations (dpeaa)DE-He213 Fuzzy approach (dpeaa)DE-He213 Tank fire (dpeaa)DE-He213 Aliabadi, Mostafa Mirzaei aut Kalatpour, Omid aut Enthalten in Practical failure analysis Springer New York, 2001 22(2022), 3 vom: 23. Mai, Seite 1293-1307 (DE-627)886125871 (DE-600)2893589-5 5555-1313 nnns volume:22 year:2022 number:3 day:23 month:05 pages:1293-1307 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11668-022-01411-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 22 2022 3 23 05 1293-1307 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s11668-022-01411-y doi (DE-627)SPR047213981 (SPR)s11668-022-01411-y-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Azizinejad, Mahsa verfasserin aut Introducing of a Method for Assessment of Difficulty of Firefighting Operation for Full Surface Atmospheric Storage Tanks Fires 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © ASM International 2022 Abstract Atmospheric tank fire incidents demand a considerable amount of logistics and planning support and serious response operation. Tank fire incidents challenge response teams and usually are difficult to manage. Some organizations have several atmospheric tanks, and they need to select the worse scenarios to pre-plan. Therefore, it is necessary to develop some tools to select the most difficult tanks fires scenarios. First, the factors affecting the firefighting operation of atmospheric tanks were identified through reviewing available scientific sources, and then, these factors were divided into four groups: tank-related, response team-related, tank peripheral, and logistic factors. Then, the selected factors were finalized with the opinion of experts and weighed by Chang’s Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP) method. The results of the study showed that among the influential factors in tank fire extinguishing management, “pre-incident planning (PIP)” (weighing 0.14551), “use of incident command system structure in response” (weighing 0.14549), “distance to adjacent tanks and facilities (domino potential)” (weighing 0.14451), “knowledge and experience” (weighing 0.14371), and “bund wall standard and integrity” (0.1443) have the most impact, respectively. Atmospheric storage tanks (dpeaa)DE-He213 Emergency response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Tank firefighting operations (dpeaa)DE-He213 Fuzzy approach (dpeaa)DE-He213 Tank fire (dpeaa)DE-He213 Aliabadi, Mostafa Mirzaei aut Kalatpour, Omid aut Enthalten in Practical failure analysis Springer New York, 2001 22(2022), 3 vom: 23. Mai, Seite 1293-1307 (DE-627)886125871 (DE-600)2893589-5 5555-1313 nnns volume:22 year:2022 number:3 day:23 month:05 pages:1293-1307 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11668-022-01411-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 22 2022 3 23 05 1293-1307 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s11668-022-01411-y doi (DE-627)SPR047213981 (SPR)s11668-022-01411-y-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Azizinejad, Mahsa verfasserin aut Introducing of a Method for Assessment of Difficulty of Firefighting Operation for Full Surface Atmospheric Storage Tanks Fires 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © ASM International 2022 Abstract Atmospheric tank fire incidents demand a considerable amount of logistics and planning support and serious response operation. Tank fire incidents challenge response teams and usually are difficult to manage. Some organizations have several atmospheric tanks, and they need to select the worse scenarios to pre-plan. Therefore, it is necessary to develop some tools to select the most difficult tanks fires scenarios. First, the factors affecting the firefighting operation of atmospheric tanks were identified through reviewing available scientific sources, and then, these factors were divided into four groups: tank-related, response team-related, tank peripheral, and logistic factors. Then, the selected factors were finalized with the opinion of experts and weighed by Chang’s Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP) method. The results of the study showed that among the influential factors in tank fire extinguishing management, “pre-incident planning (PIP)” (weighing 0.14551), “use of incident command system structure in response” (weighing 0.14549), “distance to adjacent tanks and facilities (domino potential)” (weighing 0.14451), “knowledge and experience” (weighing 0.14371), and “bund wall standard and integrity” (0.1443) have the most impact, respectively. Atmospheric storage tanks (dpeaa)DE-He213 Emergency response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Tank firefighting operations (dpeaa)DE-He213 Fuzzy approach (dpeaa)DE-He213 Tank fire (dpeaa)DE-He213 Aliabadi, Mostafa Mirzaei aut Kalatpour, Omid aut Enthalten in Practical failure analysis Springer New York, 2001 22(2022), 3 vom: 23. Mai, Seite 1293-1307 (DE-627)886125871 (DE-600)2893589-5 5555-1313 nnns volume:22 year:2022 number:3 day:23 month:05 pages:1293-1307 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11668-022-01411-y lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 22 2022 3 23 05 1293-1307 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Practical failure analysis 22(2022), 3 vom: 23. Mai, Seite 1293-1307 volume:22 year:2022 number:3 day:23 month:05 pages:1293-1307 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Practical failure analysis 22(2022), 3 vom: 23. Mai, Seite 1293-1307 volume:22 year:2022 number:3 day:23 month:05 pages:1293-1307 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Atmospheric storage tanks Emergency response Tank firefighting operations Fuzzy approach Tank fire |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Practical failure analysis |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Azizinejad, Mahsa @@aut@@ Aliabadi, Mostafa Mirzaei @@aut@@ Kalatpour, Omid @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-05-23T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
886125871 |
| id |
SPR047213981 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR047213981</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230509102423.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220608s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11668-022-01411-y</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR047213981</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s11668-022-01411-y-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Azizinejad, Mahsa</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Introducing of a Method for Assessment of Difficulty of Firefighting Operation for Full Surface Atmospheric Storage Tanks Fires</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© ASM International 2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Atmospheric tank fire incidents demand a considerable amount of logistics and planning support and serious response operation. Tank fire incidents challenge response teams and usually are difficult to manage. Some organizations have several atmospheric tanks, and they need to select the worse scenarios to pre-plan. Therefore, it is necessary to develop some tools to select the most difficult tanks fires scenarios. First, the factors affecting the firefighting operation of atmospheric tanks were identified through reviewing available scientific sources, and then, these factors were divided into four groups: tank-related, response team-related, tank peripheral, and logistic factors. Then, the selected factors were finalized with the opinion of experts and weighed by Chang’s Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP) method. The results of the study showed that among the influential factors in tank fire extinguishing management, “pre-incident planning (PIP)” (weighing 0.14551), “use of incident command system structure in response” (weighing 0.14549), “distance to adjacent tanks and facilities (domino potential)” (weighing 0.14451), “knowledge and experience” (weighing 0.14371), and “bund wall standard and integrity” (0.1443) have the most impact, respectively.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Atmospheric storage tanks</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Emergency response</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Tank firefighting operations</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fuzzy approach</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Tank fire</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aliabadi, Mostafa Mirzaei</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kalatpour, Omid</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Practical failure analysis</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer New York, 2001</subfield><subfield code="g">22(2022), 3 vom: 23. Mai, Seite 1293-1307</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)886125871</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2893589-5</subfield><subfield code="x">5555-1313</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:22</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:23</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1293-1307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11668-022-01411-y</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">22</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">23</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">1293-1307</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Azizinejad, Mahsa |
| spellingShingle |
Azizinejad, Mahsa misc Atmospheric storage tanks misc Emergency response misc Tank firefighting operations misc Fuzzy approach misc Tank fire Introducing of a Method for Assessment of Difficulty of Firefighting Operation for Full Surface Atmospheric Storage Tanks Fires |
| authorStr |
Azizinejad, Mahsa |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)886125871 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
5555-1313 |
| topic_title |
Introducing of a Method for Assessment of Difficulty of Firefighting Operation for Full Surface Atmospheric Storage Tanks Fires Atmospheric storage tanks (dpeaa)DE-He213 Emergency response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Tank firefighting operations (dpeaa)DE-He213 Fuzzy approach (dpeaa)DE-He213 Tank fire (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
misc Atmospheric storage tanks misc Emergency response misc Tank firefighting operations misc Fuzzy approach misc Tank fire |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Atmospheric storage tanks misc Emergency response misc Tank firefighting operations misc Fuzzy approach misc Tank fire |
| topic_browse |
misc Atmospheric storage tanks misc Emergency response misc Tank firefighting operations misc Fuzzy approach misc Tank fire |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Practical failure analysis |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
886125871 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Practical failure analysis |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)886125871 (DE-600)2893589-5 |
| title |
Introducing of a Method for Assessment of Difficulty of Firefighting Operation for Full Surface Atmospheric Storage Tanks Fires |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR047213981 (SPR)s11668-022-01411-y-e |
| title_full |
Introducing of a Method for Assessment of Difficulty of Firefighting Operation for Full Surface Atmospheric Storage Tanks Fires |
| author_sort |
Azizinejad, Mahsa |
| journal |
Practical failure analysis |
| journalStr |
Practical failure analysis |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2022 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
1293 |
| author_browse |
Azizinejad, Mahsa Aliabadi, Mostafa Mirzaei Kalatpour, Omid |
| container_volume |
22 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Azizinejad, Mahsa |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s11668-022-01411-y |
| title_sort |
introducing of a method for assessment of difficulty of firefighting operation for full surface atmospheric storage tanks fires |
| title_auth |
Introducing of a Method for Assessment of Difficulty of Firefighting Operation for Full Surface Atmospheric Storage Tanks Fires |
| abstract |
Abstract Atmospheric tank fire incidents demand a considerable amount of logistics and planning support and serious response operation. Tank fire incidents challenge response teams and usually are difficult to manage. Some organizations have several atmospheric tanks, and they need to select the worse scenarios to pre-plan. Therefore, it is necessary to develop some tools to select the most difficult tanks fires scenarios. First, the factors affecting the firefighting operation of atmospheric tanks were identified through reviewing available scientific sources, and then, these factors were divided into four groups: tank-related, response team-related, tank peripheral, and logistic factors. Then, the selected factors were finalized with the opinion of experts and weighed by Chang’s Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP) method. The results of the study showed that among the influential factors in tank fire extinguishing management, “pre-incident planning (PIP)” (weighing 0.14551), “use of incident command system structure in response” (weighing 0.14549), “distance to adjacent tanks and facilities (domino potential)” (weighing 0.14451), “knowledge and experience” (weighing 0.14371), and “bund wall standard and integrity” (0.1443) have the most impact, respectively. © ASM International 2022 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract Atmospheric tank fire incidents demand a considerable amount of logistics and planning support and serious response operation. Tank fire incidents challenge response teams and usually are difficult to manage. Some organizations have several atmospheric tanks, and they need to select the worse scenarios to pre-plan. Therefore, it is necessary to develop some tools to select the most difficult tanks fires scenarios. First, the factors affecting the firefighting operation of atmospheric tanks were identified through reviewing available scientific sources, and then, these factors were divided into four groups: tank-related, response team-related, tank peripheral, and logistic factors. Then, the selected factors were finalized with the opinion of experts and weighed by Chang’s Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP) method. The results of the study showed that among the influential factors in tank fire extinguishing management, “pre-incident planning (PIP)” (weighing 0.14551), “use of incident command system structure in response” (weighing 0.14549), “distance to adjacent tanks and facilities (domino potential)” (weighing 0.14451), “knowledge and experience” (weighing 0.14371), and “bund wall standard and integrity” (0.1443) have the most impact, respectively. © ASM International 2022 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Atmospheric tank fire incidents demand a considerable amount of logistics and planning support and serious response operation. Tank fire incidents challenge response teams and usually are difficult to manage. Some organizations have several atmospheric tanks, and they need to select the worse scenarios to pre-plan. Therefore, it is necessary to develop some tools to select the most difficult tanks fires scenarios. First, the factors affecting the firefighting operation of atmospheric tanks were identified through reviewing available scientific sources, and then, these factors were divided into four groups: tank-related, response team-related, tank peripheral, and logistic factors. Then, the selected factors were finalized with the opinion of experts and weighed by Chang’s Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP) method. The results of the study showed that among the influential factors in tank fire extinguishing management, “pre-incident planning (PIP)” (weighing 0.14551), “use of incident command system structure in response” (weighing 0.14549), “distance to adjacent tanks and facilities (domino potential)” (weighing 0.14451), “knowledge and experience” (weighing 0.14371), and “bund wall standard and integrity” (0.1443) have the most impact, respectively. © ASM International 2022 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER |
| container_issue |
3 |
| title_short |
Introducing of a Method for Assessment of Difficulty of Firefighting Operation for Full Surface Atmospheric Storage Tanks Fires |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11668-022-01411-y |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Aliabadi, Mostafa Mirzaei Kalatpour, Omid |
| author2Str |
Aliabadi, Mostafa Mirzaei Kalatpour, Omid |
| ppnlink |
886125871 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s11668-022-01411-y |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T02:19:58.750Z |
| _version_ |
1803613213818880000 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR047213981</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230509102423.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220608s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11668-022-01411-y</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR047213981</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s11668-022-01411-y-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Azizinejad, Mahsa</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Introducing of a Method for Assessment of Difficulty of Firefighting Operation for Full Surface Atmospheric Storage Tanks Fires</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© ASM International 2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Atmospheric tank fire incidents demand a considerable amount of logistics and planning support and serious response operation. Tank fire incidents challenge response teams and usually are difficult to manage. Some organizations have several atmospheric tanks, and they need to select the worse scenarios to pre-plan. Therefore, it is necessary to develop some tools to select the most difficult tanks fires scenarios. First, the factors affecting the firefighting operation of atmospheric tanks were identified through reviewing available scientific sources, and then, these factors were divided into four groups: tank-related, response team-related, tank peripheral, and logistic factors. Then, the selected factors were finalized with the opinion of experts and weighed by Chang’s Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP) method. The results of the study showed that among the influential factors in tank fire extinguishing management, “pre-incident planning (PIP)” (weighing 0.14551), “use of incident command system structure in response” (weighing 0.14549), “distance to adjacent tanks and facilities (domino potential)” (weighing 0.14451), “knowledge and experience” (weighing 0.14371), and “bund wall standard and integrity” (0.1443) have the most impact, respectively.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Atmospheric storage tanks</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Emergency response</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Tank firefighting operations</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fuzzy approach</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Tank fire</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aliabadi, Mostafa Mirzaei</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kalatpour, Omid</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Practical failure analysis</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer New York, 2001</subfield><subfield code="g">22(2022), 3 vom: 23. Mai, Seite 1293-1307</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)886125871</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2893589-5</subfield><subfield code="x">5555-1313</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:22</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:23</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1293-1307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11668-022-01411-y</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">22</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">23</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">1293-1307</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4018393 |