Accuracy of capillary blood glucose for 50-g glucose challenge test for gestational diabetes screening

Purpose To assess the accuracy of capillary blood glucose (CBG) compared to conventional venous plasma glucose (VPG) testing for 50-g glucose challenge test (GCT) in gestational diabetes (GDM) screening. Methods A total of 300 women were enrolled and 50-g GCT for GDM screening was offered. At 1 h af...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Boriboonhirunsarn, Dittakarn [verfasserIn] Robkhonburi, Amporn Asad-dehghan, Maria

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2022

Schlagwörter:	Gestational diabetes 50-g glucose challenge test Venous plasma glucose Capillary blood glucose Accuracy

Anmerkung:	© The Japan Diabetes Society 2022

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Diabetology international - Tokyo : Springer Japan, 2010, 13(2022), 3 vom: 07. Feb., Seite 561-565
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:13 ; year:2022 ; number:3 ; day:07 ; month:02 ; pages:561-565

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.1007/s13340-022-00572-3

Katalog-ID:	SPR047217812

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	SPR047217812
003	DE-627
005	20230509102439.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	220608s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1007/s13340-022-00572-3 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)SPR047217812
035			\|a (SPR)s13340-022-00572-3-e
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
100	1		\|a Boriboonhirunsarn, Dittakarn \|e verfasserin \|0 (orcid)0000-0002-5901-5923 \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Accuracy of capillary blood glucose for 50-g glucose challenge test for gestational diabetes screening
264		1	\|c 2022
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
500			\|a © The Japan Diabetes Society 2022
520			\|a Purpose To assess the accuracy of capillary blood glucose (CBG) compared to conventional venous plasma glucose (VPG) testing for 50-g glucose challenge test (GCT) in gestational diabetes (GDM) screening. Methods A total of 300 women were enrolled and 50-g GCT for GDM screening was offered. At 1 h after glucose loading, CBG was evaluated by CONTOUR® PLUS glucose meter by well-trained nurses immediately after venipuncture for VPG. Results of CBG were compared with those from VPG to evaluate its accuracy. Women with venous plasma glucose > 140 mg/dL were offered 100-g OGTT for GDM diagnosis. Results The mean age was 30.2 years and the mean gestational age at testing was 21.8 weeks. GDM was diagnosed in 34 women (11.3%). The mean VPG was 142.1 ± 32.9 mg/dL and the mean CBG was 129.3 ± 33.5 mg/dL. Mean difference was −12.3 ± 12.5 mg/dL, corresponding to −8.8 ± 11.4%. CBG significantly correlated with VPG with correlation coefficient of 0.929, p < 0.001. In the detection of abnormal 50-g GCT results (VPG ≥ 140 mg/dL), at 126 mg/dL cutoff, CBG had sensitivity of 92.5%, specificity of 81.8%, and positive and negative predictive values of 82.8%and 92%. None of the GDM would have been missed if CBG was used. Conclusion CBG by a certified glucose meter could be considered as an alternative to conventional VPG testing for 50-g GCT for GDM screening using 126 mg/dL cutoff value.
650		4	\|a Gestational diabetes \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a 50-g glucose challenge test \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Venous plasma glucose \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Capillary blood glucose \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Accuracy \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
700	1		\|a Robkhonburi, Amporn \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Asad-dehghan, Maria \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Diabetology international \|d Tokyo : Springer Japan, 2010 \|g 13(2022), 3 vom: 07. Feb., Seite 561-565 \|w (DE-627)636198022 \|w (DE-600)2574501-3 \|x 2190-1686 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:13 \|g year:2022 \|g number:3 \|g day:07 \|g month:02 \|g pages:561-565
856	4	0	\|u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13340-022-00572-3 \|z lizenzpflichtig \|3 Volltext
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_SPRINGER
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_32
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_90
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_100
912			\|a GBV_ILN_101
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_120
912			\|a GBV_ILN_138
912			\|a GBV_ILN_150
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_171
912			\|a GBV_ILN_187
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_250
912			\|a GBV_ILN_281
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_636
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2001
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2004
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2006
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2007
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2008
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2010
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2015
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2020
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2021
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2025
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2026
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2027
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2031
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2034
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2038
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2039
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2044
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2048
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2049
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2050
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2056
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2057
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2059
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2061
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2064
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2065
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2068
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2088
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2093
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2106
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2107
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2108
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2113
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2118
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2122
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2129
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2143
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2144
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2147
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2148
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2153
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2188
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2190
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2232
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2336
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2446
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2470
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2472
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2507
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2522
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2548
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4046
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4242
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4246
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4251
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4328
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4333
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4334
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4336
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4393
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 13 \|j 2022 \|e 3 \|b 07 \|c 02 \|h 561-565

Indexfelder

author_variant	d b db a r ar m a d mad
matchkey_str	article:21901686:2022----::cuayfailrbodlcsfr0guoehlegtsfrett
hierarchy_sort_str	2022
publishDate	2022
allfields	10.1007/s13340-022-00572-3 doi (DE-627)SPR047217812 (SPR)s13340-022-00572-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Boriboonhirunsarn, Dittakarn verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-5901-5923 aut Accuracy of capillary blood glucose for 50-g glucose challenge test for gestational diabetes screening 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Japan Diabetes Society 2022 Purpose To assess the accuracy of capillary blood glucose (CBG) compared to conventional venous plasma glucose (VPG) testing for 50-g glucose challenge test (GCT) in gestational diabetes (GDM) screening. Methods A total of 300 women were enrolled and 50-g GCT for GDM screening was offered. At 1 h after glucose loading, CBG was evaluated by CONTOUR® PLUS glucose meter by well-trained nurses immediately after venipuncture for VPG. Results of CBG were compared with those from VPG to evaluate its accuracy. Women with venous plasma glucose > 140 mg/dL were offered 100-g OGTT for GDM diagnosis. Results The mean age was 30.2 years and the mean gestational age at testing was 21.8 weeks. GDM was diagnosed in 34 women (11.3%). The mean VPG was 142.1 ± 32.9 mg/dL and the mean CBG was 129.3 ± 33.5 mg/dL. Mean difference was −12.3 ± 12.5 mg/dL, corresponding to −8.8 ± 11.4%. CBG significantly correlated with VPG with correlation coefficient of 0.929, p < 0.001. In the detection of abnormal 50-g GCT results (VPG ≥ 140 mg/dL), at 126 mg/dL cutoff, CBG had sensitivity of 92.5%, specificity of 81.8%, and positive and negative predictive values of 82.8%and 92%. None of the GDM would have been missed if CBG was used. Conclusion CBG by a certified glucose meter could be considered as an alternative to conventional VPG testing for 50-g GCT for GDM screening using 126 mg/dL cutoff value. Gestational diabetes (dpeaa)DE-He213 50-g glucose challenge test (dpeaa)DE-He213 Venous plasma glucose (dpeaa)DE-He213 Capillary blood glucose (dpeaa)DE-He213 Accuracy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Robkhonburi, Amporn aut Asad-dehghan, Maria aut Enthalten in Diabetology international Tokyo : Springer Japan, 2010 13(2022), 3 vom: 07. Feb., Seite 561-565 (DE-627)636198022 (DE-600)2574501-3 2190-1686 nnns volume:13 year:2022 number:3 day:07 month:02 pages:561-565 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13340-022-00572-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2022 3 07 02 561-565
spelling	10.1007/s13340-022-00572-3 doi (DE-627)SPR047217812 (SPR)s13340-022-00572-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Boriboonhirunsarn, Dittakarn verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-5901-5923 aut Accuracy of capillary blood glucose for 50-g glucose challenge test for gestational diabetes screening 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Japan Diabetes Society 2022 Purpose To assess the accuracy of capillary blood glucose (CBG) compared to conventional venous plasma glucose (VPG) testing for 50-g glucose challenge test (GCT) in gestational diabetes (GDM) screening. Methods A total of 300 women were enrolled and 50-g GCT for GDM screening was offered. At 1 h after glucose loading, CBG was evaluated by CONTOUR® PLUS glucose meter by well-trained nurses immediately after venipuncture for VPG. Results of CBG were compared with those from VPG to evaluate its accuracy. Women with venous plasma glucose > 140 mg/dL were offered 100-g OGTT for GDM diagnosis. Results The mean age was 30.2 years and the mean gestational age at testing was 21.8 weeks. GDM was diagnosed in 34 women (11.3%). The mean VPG was 142.1 ± 32.9 mg/dL and the mean CBG was 129.3 ± 33.5 mg/dL. Mean difference was −12.3 ± 12.5 mg/dL, corresponding to −8.8 ± 11.4%. CBG significantly correlated with VPG with correlation coefficient of 0.929, p < 0.001. In the detection of abnormal 50-g GCT results (VPG ≥ 140 mg/dL), at 126 mg/dL cutoff, CBG had sensitivity of 92.5%, specificity of 81.8%, and positive and negative predictive values of 82.8%and 92%. None of the GDM would have been missed if CBG was used. Conclusion CBG by a certified glucose meter could be considered as an alternative to conventional VPG testing for 50-g GCT for GDM screening using 126 mg/dL cutoff value. Gestational diabetes (dpeaa)DE-He213 50-g glucose challenge test (dpeaa)DE-He213 Venous plasma glucose (dpeaa)DE-He213 Capillary blood glucose (dpeaa)DE-He213 Accuracy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Robkhonburi, Amporn aut Asad-dehghan, Maria aut Enthalten in Diabetology international Tokyo : Springer Japan, 2010 13(2022), 3 vom: 07. Feb., Seite 561-565 (DE-627)636198022 (DE-600)2574501-3 2190-1686 nnns volume:13 year:2022 number:3 day:07 month:02 pages:561-565 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13340-022-00572-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2022 3 07 02 561-565
allfields_unstemmed	10.1007/s13340-022-00572-3 doi (DE-627)SPR047217812 (SPR)s13340-022-00572-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Boriboonhirunsarn, Dittakarn verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-5901-5923 aut Accuracy of capillary blood glucose for 50-g glucose challenge test for gestational diabetes screening 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Japan Diabetes Society 2022 Purpose To assess the accuracy of capillary blood glucose (CBG) compared to conventional venous plasma glucose (VPG) testing for 50-g glucose challenge test (GCT) in gestational diabetes (GDM) screening. Methods A total of 300 women were enrolled and 50-g GCT for GDM screening was offered. At 1 h after glucose loading, CBG was evaluated by CONTOUR® PLUS glucose meter by well-trained nurses immediately after venipuncture for VPG. Results of CBG were compared with those from VPG to evaluate its accuracy. Women with venous plasma glucose > 140 mg/dL were offered 100-g OGTT for GDM diagnosis. Results The mean age was 30.2 years and the mean gestational age at testing was 21.8 weeks. GDM was diagnosed in 34 women (11.3%). The mean VPG was 142.1 ± 32.9 mg/dL and the mean CBG was 129.3 ± 33.5 mg/dL. Mean difference was −12.3 ± 12.5 mg/dL, corresponding to −8.8 ± 11.4%. CBG significantly correlated with VPG with correlation coefficient of 0.929, p < 0.001. In the detection of abnormal 50-g GCT results (VPG ≥ 140 mg/dL), at 126 mg/dL cutoff, CBG had sensitivity of 92.5%, specificity of 81.8%, and positive and negative predictive values of 82.8%and 92%. None of the GDM would have been missed if CBG was used. Conclusion CBG by a certified glucose meter could be considered as an alternative to conventional VPG testing for 50-g GCT for GDM screening using 126 mg/dL cutoff value. Gestational diabetes (dpeaa)DE-He213 50-g glucose challenge test (dpeaa)DE-He213 Venous plasma glucose (dpeaa)DE-He213 Capillary blood glucose (dpeaa)DE-He213 Accuracy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Robkhonburi, Amporn aut Asad-dehghan, Maria aut Enthalten in Diabetology international Tokyo : Springer Japan, 2010 13(2022), 3 vom: 07. Feb., Seite 561-565 (DE-627)636198022 (DE-600)2574501-3 2190-1686 nnns volume:13 year:2022 number:3 day:07 month:02 pages:561-565 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13340-022-00572-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2022 3 07 02 561-565
allfieldsGer	10.1007/s13340-022-00572-3 doi (DE-627)SPR047217812 (SPR)s13340-022-00572-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Boriboonhirunsarn, Dittakarn verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-5901-5923 aut Accuracy of capillary blood glucose for 50-g glucose challenge test for gestational diabetes screening 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Japan Diabetes Society 2022 Purpose To assess the accuracy of capillary blood glucose (CBG) compared to conventional venous plasma glucose (VPG) testing for 50-g glucose challenge test (GCT) in gestational diabetes (GDM) screening. Methods A total of 300 women were enrolled and 50-g GCT for GDM screening was offered. At 1 h after glucose loading, CBG was evaluated by CONTOUR® PLUS glucose meter by well-trained nurses immediately after venipuncture for VPG. Results of CBG were compared with those from VPG to evaluate its accuracy. Women with venous plasma glucose > 140 mg/dL were offered 100-g OGTT for GDM diagnosis. Results The mean age was 30.2 years and the mean gestational age at testing was 21.8 weeks. GDM was diagnosed in 34 women (11.3%). The mean VPG was 142.1 ± 32.9 mg/dL and the mean CBG was 129.3 ± 33.5 mg/dL. Mean difference was −12.3 ± 12.5 mg/dL, corresponding to −8.8 ± 11.4%. CBG significantly correlated with VPG with correlation coefficient of 0.929, p < 0.001. In the detection of abnormal 50-g GCT results (VPG ≥ 140 mg/dL), at 126 mg/dL cutoff, CBG had sensitivity of 92.5%, specificity of 81.8%, and positive and negative predictive values of 82.8%and 92%. None of the GDM would have been missed if CBG was used. Conclusion CBG by a certified glucose meter could be considered as an alternative to conventional VPG testing for 50-g GCT for GDM screening using 126 mg/dL cutoff value. Gestational diabetes (dpeaa)DE-He213 50-g glucose challenge test (dpeaa)DE-He213 Venous plasma glucose (dpeaa)DE-He213 Capillary blood glucose (dpeaa)DE-He213 Accuracy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Robkhonburi, Amporn aut Asad-dehghan, Maria aut Enthalten in Diabetology international Tokyo : Springer Japan, 2010 13(2022), 3 vom: 07. Feb., Seite 561-565 (DE-627)636198022 (DE-600)2574501-3 2190-1686 nnns volume:13 year:2022 number:3 day:07 month:02 pages:561-565 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13340-022-00572-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2022 3 07 02 561-565
allfieldsSound	10.1007/s13340-022-00572-3 doi (DE-627)SPR047217812 (SPR)s13340-022-00572-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Boriboonhirunsarn, Dittakarn verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-5901-5923 aut Accuracy of capillary blood glucose for 50-g glucose challenge test for gestational diabetes screening 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Japan Diabetes Society 2022 Purpose To assess the accuracy of capillary blood glucose (CBG) compared to conventional venous plasma glucose (VPG) testing for 50-g glucose challenge test (GCT) in gestational diabetes (GDM) screening. Methods A total of 300 women were enrolled and 50-g GCT for GDM screening was offered. At 1 h after glucose loading, CBG was evaluated by CONTOUR® PLUS glucose meter by well-trained nurses immediately after venipuncture for VPG. Results of CBG were compared with those from VPG to evaluate its accuracy. Women with venous plasma glucose > 140 mg/dL were offered 100-g OGTT for GDM diagnosis. Results The mean age was 30.2 years and the mean gestational age at testing was 21.8 weeks. GDM was diagnosed in 34 women (11.3%). The mean VPG was 142.1 ± 32.9 mg/dL and the mean CBG was 129.3 ± 33.5 mg/dL. Mean difference was −12.3 ± 12.5 mg/dL, corresponding to −8.8 ± 11.4%. CBG significantly correlated with VPG with correlation coefficient of 0.929, p < 0.001. In the detection of abnormal 50-g GCT results (VPG ≥ 140 mg/dL), at 126 mg/dL cutoff, CBG had sensitivity of 92.5%, specificity of 81.8%, and positive and negative predictive values of 82.8%and 92%. None of the GDM would have been missed if CBG was used. Conclusion CBG by a certified glucose meter could be considered as an alternative to conventional VPG testing for 50-g GCT for GDM screening using 126 mg/dL cutoff value. Gestational diabetes (dpeaa)DE-He213 50-g glucose challenge test (dpeaa)DE-He213 Venous plasma glucose (dpeaa)DE-He213 Capillary blood glucose (dpeaa)DE-He213 Accuracy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Robkhonburi, Amporn aut Asad-dehghan, Maria aut Enthalten in Diabetology international Tokyo : Springer Japan, 2010 13(2022), 3 vom: 07. Feb., Seite 561-565 (DE-627)636198022 (DE-600)2574501-3 2190-1686 nnns volume:13 year:2022 number:3 day:07 month:02 pages:561-565 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13340-022-00572-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2022 3 07 02 561-565
language	English
source	Enthalten in Diabetology international 13(2022), 3 vom: 07. Feb., Seite 561-565 volume:13 year:2022 number:3 day:07 month:02 pages:561-565
sourceStr	Enthalten in Diabetology international 13(2022), 3 vom: 07. Feb., Seite 561-565 volume:13 year:2022 number:3 day:07 month:02 pages:561-565
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Gestational diabetes 50-g glucose challenge test Venous plasma glucose Capillary blood glucose Accuracy
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	Diabetology international
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Boriboonhirunsarn, Dittakarn @@aut@@ Robkhonburi, Amporn @@aut@@ Asad-dehghan, Maria @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2022-02-07T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	636198022
id	SPR047217812
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR047217812</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230509102439.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220608s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s13340-022-00572-3</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR047217812</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s13340-022-00572-3-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Boriboonhirunsarn, Dittakarn</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-5901-5923</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Accuracy of capillary blood glucose for 50-g glucose challenge test for gestational diabetes screening</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Japan Diabetes Society 2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Purpose To assess the accuracy of capillary blood glucose (CBG) compared to conventional venous plasma glucose (VPG) testing for 50-g glucose challenge test (GCT) in gestational diabetes (GDM) screening. Methods A total of 300 women were enrolled and 50-g GCT for GDM screening was offered. At 1 h after glucose loading, CBG was evaluated by CONTOUR® PLUS glucose meter by well-trained nurses immediately after venipuncture for VPG. Results of CBG were compared with those from VPG to evaluate its accuracy. Women with venous plasma glucose > 140 mg/dL were offered 100-g OGTT for GDM diagnosis. Results The mean age was 30.2 years and the mean gestational age at testing was 21.8 weeks. GDM was diagnosed in 34 women (11.3%). The mean VPG was 142.1 ± 32.9 mg/dL and the mean CBG was 129.3 ± 33.5 mg/dL. Mean difference was −12.3 ± 12.5 mg/dL, corresponding to −8.8 ± 11.4%. CBG significantly correlated with VPG with correlation coefficient of 0.929, p < 0.001. In the detection of abnormal 50-g GCT results (VPG ≥ 140 mg/dL), at 126 mg/dL cutoff, CBG had sensitivity of 92.5%, specificity of 81.8%, and positive and negative predictive values of 82.8%and 92%. None of the GDM would have been missed if CBG was used. Conclusion CBG by a certified glucose meter could be considered as an alternative to conventional VPG testing for 50-g GCT for GDM screening using 126 mg/dL cutoff value.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Gestational diabetes</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">50-g glucose challenge test</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Venous plasma glucose</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Capillary blood glucose</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Accuracy</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Robkhonburi, Amporn</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Asad-dehghan, Maria</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Diabetology international</subfield><subfield code="d">Tokyo : Springer Japan, 2010</subfield><subfield code="g">13(2022), 3 vom: 07. Feb., Seite 561-565</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)636198022</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2574501-3</subfield><subfield code="x">2190-1686</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:13</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:07</subfield><subfield code="g">month:02</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:561-565</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13340-022-00572-3</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">13</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">07</subfield><subfield code="c">02</subfield><subfield code="h">561-565</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Boriboonhirunsarn, Dittakarn
spellingShingle	Boriboonhirunsarn, Dittakarn misc Gestational diabetes misc 50-g glucose challenge test misc Venous plasma glucose misc Capillary blood glucose misc Accuracy Accuracy of capillary blood glucose for 50-g glucose challenge test for gestational diabetes screening
authorStr	Boriboonhirunsarn, Dittakarn
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)636198022
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut
collection	springer
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	2190-1686
topic_title	Accuracy of capillary blood glucose for 50-g glucose challenge test for gestational diabetes screening Gestational diabetes (dpeaa)DE-He213 50-g glucose challenge test (dpeaa)DE-He213 Venous plasma glucose (dpeaa)DE-He213 Capillary blood glucose (dpeaa)DE-He213 Accuracy (dpeaa)DE-He213
topic	misc Gestational diabetes misc 50-g glucose challenge test misc Venous plasma glucose misc Capillary blood glucose misc Accuracy
topic_unstemmed	misc Gestational diabetes misc 50-g glucose challenge test misc Venous plasma glucose misc Capillary blood glucose misc Accuracy
topic_browse	misc Gestational diabetes misc 50-g glucose challenge test misc Venous plasma glucose misc Capillary blood glucose misc Accuracy
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Diabetology international
hierarchy_parent_id	636198022
hierarchy_top_title	Diabetology international
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)636198022 (DE-600)2574501-3
title	Accuracy of capillary blood glucose for 50-g glucose challenge test for gestational diabetes screening
ctrlnum	(DE-627)SPR047217812 (SPR)s13340-022-00572-3-e
title_full	Accuracy of capillary blood glucose for 50-g glucose challenge test for gestational diabetes screening
author_sort	Boriboonhirunsarn, Dittakarn
journal	Diabetology international
journalStr	Diabetology international
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2022
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	561
author_browse	Boriboonhirunsarn, Dittakarn Robkhonburi, Amporn Asad-dehghan, Maria
container_volume	13
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Boriboonhirunsarn, Dittakarn
doi_str_mv	10.1007/s13340-022-00572-3
normlink	(ORCID)0000-0002-5901-5923
normlink_prefix_str_mv	(orcid)0000-0002-5901-5923
title_sort	accuracy of capillary blood glucose for 50-g glucose challenge test for gestational diabetes screening
title_auth	Accuracy of capillary blood glucose for 50-g glucose challenge test for gestational diabetes screening
abstract	Purpose To assess the accuracy of capillary blood glucose (CBG) compared to conventional venous plasma glucose (VPG) testing for 50-g glucose challenge test (GCT) in gestational diabetes (GDM) screening. Methods A total of 300 women were enrolled and 50-g GCT for GDM screening was offered. At 1 h after glucose loading, CBG was evaluated by CONTOUR® PLUS glucose meter by well-trained nurses immediately after venipuncture for VPG. Results of CBG were compared with those from VPG to evaluate its accuracy. Women with venous plasma glucose > 140 mg/dL were offered 100-g OGTT for GDM diagnosis. Results The mean age was 30.2 years and the mean gestational age at testing was 21.8 weeks. GDM was diagnosed in 34 women (11.3%). The mean VPG was 142.1 ± 32.9 mg/dL and the mean CBG was 129.3 ± 33.5 mg/dL. Mean difference was −12.3 ± 12.5 mg/dL, corresponding to −8.8 ± 11.4%. CBG significantly correlated with VPG with correlation coefficient of 0.929, p < 0.001. In the detection of abnormal 50-g GCT results (VPG ≥ 140 mg/dL), at 126 mg/dL cutoff, CBG had sensitivity of 92.5%, specificity of 81.8%, and positive and negative predictive values of 82.8%and 92%. None of the GDM would have been missed if CBG was used. Conclusion CBG by a certified glucose meter could be considered as an alternative to conventional VPG testing for 50-g GCT for GDM screening using 126 mg/dL cutoff value. © The Japan Diabetes Society 2022
abstractGer	Purpose To assess the accuracy of capillary blood glucose (CBG) compared to conventional venous plasma glucose (VPG) testing for 50-g glucose challenge test (GCT) in gestational diabetes (GDM) screening. Methods A total of 300 women were enrolled and 50-g GCT for GDM screening was offered. At 1 h after glucose loading, CBG was evaluated by CONTOUR® PLUS glucose meter by well-trained nurses immediately after venipuncture for VPG. Results of CBG were compared with those from VPG to evaluate its accuracy. Women with venous plasma glucose > 140 mg/dL were offered 100-g OGTT for GDM diagnosis. Results The mean age was 30.2 years and the mean gestational age at testing was 21.8 weeks. GDM was diagnosed in 34 women (11.3%). The mean VPG was 142.1 ± 32.9 mg/dL and the mean CBG was 129.3 ± 33.5 mg/dL. Mean difference was −12.3 ± 12.5 mg/dL, corresponding to −8.8 ± 11.4%. CBG significantly correlated with VPG with correlation coefficient of 0.929, p < 0.001. In the detection of abnormal 50-g GCT results (VPG ≥ 140 mg/dL), at 126 mg/dL cutoff, CBG had sensitivity of 92.5%, specificity of 81.8%, and positive and negative predictive values of 82.8%and 92%. None of the GDM would have been missed if CBG was used. Conclusion CBG by a certified glucose meter could be considered as an alternative to conventional VPG testing for 50-g GCT for GDM screening using 126 mg/dL cutoff value. © The Japan Diabetes Society 2022
abstract_unstemmed	Purpose To assess the accuracy of capillary blood glucose (CBG) compared to conventional venous plasma glucose (VPG) testing for 50-g glucose challenge test (GCT) in gestational diabetes (GDM) screening. Methods A total of 300 women were enrolled and 50-g GCT for GDM screening was offered. At 1 h after glucose loading, CBG was evaluated by CONTOUR® PLUS glucose meter by well-trained nurses immediately after venipuncture for VPG. Results of CBG were compared with those from VPG to evaluate its accuracy. Women with venous plasma glucose > 140 mg/dL were offered 100-g OGTT for GDM diagnosis. Results The mean age was 30.2 years and the mean gestational age at testing was 21.8 weeks. GDM was diagnosed in 34 women (11.3%). The mean VPG was 142.1 ± 32.9 mg/dL and the mean CBG was 129.3 ± 33.5 mg/dL. Mean difference was −12.3 ± 12.5 mg/dL, corresponding to −8.8 ± 11.4%. CBG significantly correlated with VPG with correlation coefficient of 0.929, p < 0.001. In the detection of abnormal 50-g GCT results (VPG ≥ 140 mg/dL), at 126 mg/dL cutoff, CBG had sensitivity of 92.5%, specificity of 81.8%, and positive and negative predictive values of 82.8%and 92%. None of the GDM would have been missed if CBG was used. Conclusion CBG by a certified glucose meter could be considered as an alternative to conventional VPG testing for 50-g GCT for GDM screening using 126 mg/dL cutoff value. © The Japan Diabetes Society 2022
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	3
title_short	Accuracy of capillary blood glucose for 50-g glucose challenge test for gestational diabetes screening
url	https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13340-022-00572-3
remote_bool	true
author2	Robkhonburi, Amporn Asad-dehghan, Maria
author2Str	Robkhonburi, Amporn Asad-dehghan, Maria
ppnlink	636198022
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1007/s13340-022-00572-3
up_date	2024-07-04T02:20:59.654Z
_version_	1803613277684498432
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR047217812</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230509102439.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220608s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s13340-022-00572-3</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR047217812</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s13340-022-00572-3-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Boriboonhirunsarn, Dittakarn</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-5901-5923</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Accuracy of capillary blood glucose for 50-g glucose challenge test for gestational diabetes screening</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Japan Diabetes Society 2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Purpose To assess the accuracy of capillary blood glucose (CBG) compared to conventional venous plasma glucose (VPG) testing for 50-g glucose challenge test (GCT) in gestational diabetes (GDM) screening. Methods A total of 300 women were enrolled and 50-g GCT for GDM screening was offered. At 1 h after glucose loading, CBG was evaluated by CONTOUR® PLUS glucose meter by well-trained nurses immediately after venipuncture for VPG. Results of CBG were compared with those from VPG to evaluate its accuracy. Women with venous plasma glucose > 140 mg/dL were offered 100-g OGTT for GDM diagnosis. Results The mean age was 30.2 years and the mean gestational age at testing was 21.8 weeks. GDM was diagnosed in 34 women (11.3%). The mean VPG was 142.1 ± 32.9 mg/dL and the mean CBG was 129.3 ± 33.5 mg/dL. Mean difference was −12.3 ± 12.5 mg/dL, corresponding to −8.8 ± 11.4%. CBG significantly correlated with VPG with correlation coefficient of 0.929, p < 0.001. In the detection of abnormal 50-g GCT results (VPG ≥ 140 mg/dL), at 126 mg/dL cutoff, CBG had sensitivity of 92.5%, specificity of 81.8%, and positive and negative predictive values of 82.8%and 92%. None of the GDM would have been missed if CBG was used. Conclusion CBG by a certified glucose meter could be considered as an alternative to conventional VPG testing for 50-g GCT for GDM screening using 126 mg/dL cutoff value.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Gestational diabetes</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">50-g glucose challenge test</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Venous plasma glucose</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Capillary blood glucose</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Accuracy</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Robkhonburi, Amporn</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Asad-dehghan, Maria</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Diabetology international</subfield><subfield code="d">Tokyo : Springer Japan, 2010</subfield><subfield code="g">13(2022), 3 vom: 07. Feb., Seite 561-565</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)636198022</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2574501-3</subfield><subfield code="x">2190-1686</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:13</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:07</subfield><subfield code="g">month:02</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:561-565</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13340-022-00572-3</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">13</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">07</subfield><subfield code="c">02</subfield><subfield code="h">561-565</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.401025

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Accuracy of capillary blood glucose for 50-g glucose challenge test for gestational diabetes screening

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?