Clinical efficacy of digital chest drainage system in cardiac valve surgery

Objects The portable digitalized suction was used widely in thoracic surgery. The aim of the study was to access the early outcomes of using the portable digitalized suction system after cardiac surgery. Methods We invested 80 patients including 30 women (mean age 72.7 ± 9.2 years) who underwent car...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Tamura, Kiyoshi [verfasserIn] Sakurai, Shogo

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2021

Schlagwörter:	Digital chest drainage system Analog chest drainage system Cardiac surgery Valve surgery

Anmerkung:	© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery 2021

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery - Tōkyō : Springer Japan, 1998, 70(2021), 7 vom: 29. Nov., Seite 619-623
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:70 ; year:2021 ; number:7 ; day:29 ; month:11 ; pages:619-623

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.1007/s11748-021-01752-9

Katalog-ID:	SPR047329408

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	SPR047329408
003	DE-627
005	20230507211307.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	220619s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1007/s11748-021-01752-9 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)SPR047329408
035			\|a (SPR)s11748-021-01752-9-e
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
100	1		\|a Tamura, Kiyoshi \|e verfasserin \|0 (orcid)0000-0003-2335-1199 \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Clinical efficacy of digital chest drainage system in cardiac valve surgery
264		1	\|c 2021
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
500			\|a © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery 2021
520			\|a Objects The portable digitalized suction was used widely in thoracic surgery. The aim of the study was to access the early outcomes of using the portable digitalized suction system after cardiac surgery. Methods We invested 80 patients including 30 women (mean age 72.7 ± 9.2 years) who underwent cardiac surgery at our hospital, excluded coronary artery bypass grafting only, with or only aortic surgery, emergency operation, and patients with hemodialysis. Patients were categorized as those treated with digital chest drainage system (DCS group, n = 38) or analog chest drainage system (ACS group, n = 42), and the following data were analyzed in two groups. The primary endpoint was the duration of chest drainage, and the secondary endpoints were the rate of drainage-related complications and the length of hospitalization. Results The duration of drainage was significantly shorter in the DCS group (ACS vs. DCS = 94.8 ± 31.5 vs. 81.1 ± 20.6 h, p = 0.036). The duration needed for rehabilitation completion was significantly shorter in the DCS group (ACS vs. DCS = 10.7 ± 1.2 vs. 9.6 ± 1.5 days, p = 0.047), and the length of hospitalization was significantly shorter in the DCS group (ACS vs. DCS = 21.9 ± 5.3 vs. 18.8 ± 7.2 days, p = 0.031). Conclusions This study provided evidence that DCS might be effective for patients who underwent cardiac valve surgery.
650		4	\|a Digital chest drainage system \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Analog chest drainage system \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Cardiac surgery \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Valve surgery \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
700	1		\|a Sakurai, Shogo \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery \|d Tōkyō : Springer Japan, 1998 \|g 70(2021), 7 vom: 29. Nov., Seite 619-623 \|w (DE-627)539545104 \|w (DE-600)2381600-4 \|x 1863-2092 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:70 \|g year:2021 \|g number:7 \|g day:29 \|g month:11 \|g pages:619-623
856	4	0	\|u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11748-021-01752-9 \|z lizenzpflichtig \|3 Volltext
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_SPRINGER
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_90
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_100
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_120
912			\|a GBV_ILN_152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_171
912			\|a GBV_ILN_187
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_250
912			\|a GBV_ILN_281
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 70 \|j 2021 \|e 7 \|b 29 \|c 11 \|h 619-623

Indexfelder

author_variant	k t kt s s ss
matchkey_str	article:18632092:2021----::lnclfiayfiiacetriaeytmna
hierarchy_sort_str	2021
publishDate	2021
allfields	10.1007/s11748-021-01752-9 doi (DE-627)SPR047329408 (SPR)s11748-021-01752-9-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Tamura, Kiyoshi verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-2335-1199 aut Clinical efficacy of digital chest drainage system in cardiac valve surgery 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery 2021 Objects The portable digitalized suction was used widely in thoracic surgery. The aim of the study was to access the early outcomes of using the portable digitalized suction system after cardiac surgery. Methods We invested 80 patients including 30 women (mean age 72.7 ± 9.2 years) who underwent cardiac surgery at our hospital, excluded coronary artery bypass grafting only, with or only aortic surgery, emergency operation, and patients with hemodialysis. Patients were categorized as those treated with digital chest drainage system (DCS group, n = 38) or analog chest drainage system (ACS group, n = 42), and the following data were analyzed in two groups. The primary endpoint was the duration of chest drainage, and the secondary endpoints were the rate of drainage-related complications and the length of hospitalization. Results The duration of drainage was significantly shorter in the DCS group (ACS vs. DCS = 94.8 ± 31.5 vs. 81.1 ± 20.6 h, p = 0.036). The duration needed for rehabilitation completion was significantly shorter in the DCS group (ACS vs. DCS = 10.7 ± 1.2 vs. 9.6 ± 1.5 days, p = 0.047), and the length of hospitalization was significantly shorter in the DCS group (ACS vs. DCS = 21.9 ± 5.3 vs. 18.8 ± 7.2 days, p = 0.031). Conclusions This study provided evidence that DCS might be effective for patients who underwent cardiac valve surgery. Digital chest drainage system (dpeaa)DE-He213 Analog chest drainage system (dpeaa)DE-He213 Cardiac surgery (dpeaa)DE-He213 Valve surgery (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sakurai, Shogo aut Enthalten in The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery Tōkyō : Springer Japan, 1998 70(2021), 7 vom: 29. Nov., Seite 619-623 (DE-627)539545104 (DE-600)2381600-4 1863-2092 nnns volume:70 year:2021 number:7 day:29 month:11 pages:619-623 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11748-021-01752-9 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 AR 70 2021 7 29 11 619-623
spelling	10.1007/s11748-021-01752-9 doi (DE-627)SPR047329408 (SPR)s11748-021-01752-9-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Tamura, Kiyoshi verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-2335-1199 aut Clinical efficacy of digital chest drainage system in cardiac valve surgery 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery 2021 Objects The portable digitalized suction was used widely in thoracic surgery. The aim of the study was to access the early outcomes of using the portable digitalized suction system after cardiac surgery. Methods We invested 80 patients including 30 women (mean age 72.7 ± 9.2 years) who underwent cardiac surgery at our hospital, excluded coronary artery bypass grafting only, with or only aortic surgery, emergency operation, and patients with hemodialysis. Patients were categorized as those treated with digital chest drainage system (DCS group, n = 38) or analog chest drainage system (ACS group, n = 42), and the following data were analyzed in two groups. The primary endpoint was the duration of chest drainage, and the secondary endpoints were the rate of drainage-related complications and the length of hospitalization. Results The duration of drainage was significantly shorter in the DCS group (ACS vs. DCS = 94.8 ± 31.5 vs. 81.1 ± 20.6 h, p = 0.036). The duration needed for rehabilitation completion was significantly shorter in the DCS group (ACS vs. DCS = 10.7 ± 1.2 vs. 9.6 ± 1.5 days, p = 0.047), and the length of hospitalization was significantly shorter in the DCS group (ACS vs. DCS = 21.9 ± 5.3 vs. 18.8 ± 7.2 days, p = 0.031). Conclusions This study provided evidence that DCS might be effective for patients who underwent cardiac valve surgery. Digital chest drainage system (dpeaa)DE-He213 Analog chest drainage system (dpeaa)DE-He213 Cardiac surgery (dpeaa)DE-He213 Valve surgery (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sakurai, Shogo aut Enthalten in The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery Tōkyō : Springer Japan, 1998 70(2021), 7 vom: 29. Nov., Seite 619-623 (DE-627)539545104 (DE-600)2381600-4 1863-2092 nnns volume:70 year:2021 number:7 day:29 month:11 pages:619-623 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11748-021-01752-9 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 AR 70 2021 7 29 11 619-623
allfields_unstemmed	10.1007/s11748-021-01752-9 doi (DE-627)SPR047329408 (SPR)s11748-021-01752-9-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Tamura, Kiyoshi verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-2335-1199 aut Clinical efficacy of digital chest drainage system in cardiac valve surgery 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery 2021 Objects The portable digitalized suction was used widely in thoracic surgery. The aim of the study was to access the early outcomes of using the portable digitalized suction system after cardiac surgery. Methods We invested 80 patients including 30 women (mean age 72.7 ± 9.2 years) who underwent cardiac surgery at our hospital, excluded coronary artery bypass grafting only, with or only aortic surgery, emergency operation, and patients with hemodialysis. Patients were categorized as those treated with digital chest drainage system (DCS group, n = 38) or analog chest drainage system (ACS group, n = 42), and the following data were analyzed in two groups. The primary endpoint was the duration of chest drainage, and the secondary endpoints were the rate of drainage-related complications and the length of hospitalization. Results The duration of drainage was significantly shorter in the DCS group (ACS vs. DCS = 94.8 ± 31.5 vs. 81.1 ± 20.6 h, p = 0.036). The duration needed for rehabilitation completion was significantly shorter in the DCS group (ACS vs. DCS = 10.7 ± 1.2 vs. 9.6 ± 1.5 days, p = 0.047), and the length of hospitalization was significantly shorter in the DCS group (ACS vs. DCS = 21.9 ± 5.3 vs. 18.8 ± 7.2 days, p = 0.031). Conclusions This study provided evidence that DCS might be effective for patients who underwent cardiac valve surgery. Digital chest drainage system (dpeaa)DE-He213 Analog chest drainage system (dpeaa)DE-He213 Cardiac surgery (dpeaa)DE-He213 Valve surgery (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sakurai, Shogo aut Enthalten in The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery Tōkyō : Springer Japan, 1998 70(2021), 7 vom: 29. Nov., Seite 619-623 (DE-627)539545104 (DE-600)2381600-4 1863-2092 nnns volume:70 year:2021 number:7 day:29 month:11 pages:619-623 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11748-021-01752-9 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 AR 70 2021 7 29 11 619-623
allfieldsGer	10.1007/s11748-021-01752-9 doi (DE-627)SPR047329408 (SPR)s11748-021-01752-9-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Tamura, Kiyoshi verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-2335-1199 aut Clinical efficacy of digital chest drainage system in cardiac valve surgery 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery 2021 Objects The portable digitalized suction was used widely in thoracic surgery. The aim of the study was to access the early outcomes of using the portable digitalized suction system after cardiac surgery. Methods We invested 80 patients including 30 women (mean age 72.7 ± 9.2 years) who underwent cardiac surgery at our hospital, excluded coronary artery bypass grafting only, with or only aortic surgery, emergency operation, and patients with hemodialysis. Patients were categorized as those treated with digital chest drainage system (DCS group, n = 38) or analog chest drainage system (ACS group, n = 42), and the following data were analyzed in two groups. The primary endpoint was the duration of chest drainage, and the secondary endpoints were the rate of drainage-related complications and the length of hospitalization. Results The duration of drainage was significantly shorter in the DCS group (ACS vs. DCS = 94.8 ± 31.5 vs. 81.1 ± 20.6 h, p = 0.036). The duration needed for rehabilitation completion was significantly shorter in the DCS group (ACS vs. DCS = 10.7 ± 1.2 vs. 9.6 ± 1.5 days, p = 0.047), and the length of hospitalization was significantly shorter in the DCS group (ACS vs. DCS = 21.9 ± 5.3 vs. 18.8 ± 7.2 days, p = 0.031). Conclusions This study provided evidence that DCS might be effective for patients who underwent cardiac valve surgery. Digital chest drainage system (dpeaa)DE-He213 Analog chest drainage system (dpeaa)DE-He213 Cardiac surgery (dpeaa)DE-He213 Valve surgery (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sakurai, Shogo aut Enthalten in The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery Tōkyō : Springer Japan, 1998 70(2021), 7 vom: 29. Nov., Seite 619-623 (DE-627)539545104 (DE-600)2381600-4 1863-2092 nnns volume:70 year:2021 number:7 day:29 month:11 pages:619-623 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11748-021-01752-9 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 AR 70 2021 7 29 11 619-623
allfieldsSound	10.1007/s11748-021-01752-9 doi (DE-627)SPR047329408 (SPR)s11748-021-01752-9-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Tamura, Kiyoshi verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-2335-1199 aut Clinical efficacy of digital chest drainage system in cardiac valve surgery 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery 2021 Objects The portable digitalized suction was used widely in thoracic surgery. The aim of the study was to access the early outcomes of using the portable digitalized suction system after cardiac surgery. Methods We invested 80 patients including 30 women (mean age 72.7 ± 9.2 years) who underwent cardiac surgery at our hospital, excluded coronary artery bypass grafting only, with or only aortic surgery, emergency operation, and patients with hemodialysis. Patients were categorized as those treated with digital chest drainage system (DCS group, n = 38) or analog chest drainage system (ACS group, n = 42), and the following data were analyzed in two groups. The primary endpoint was the duration of chest drainage, and the secondary endpoints were the rate of drainage-related complications and the length of hospitalization. Results The duration of drainage was significantly shorter in the DCS group (ACS vs. DCS = 94.8 ± 31.5 vs. 81.1 ± 20.6 h, p = 0.036). The duration needed for rehabilitation completion was significantly shorter in the DCS group (ACS vs. DCS = 10.7 ± 1.2 vs. 9.6 ± 1.5 days, p = 0.047), and the length of hospitalization was significantly shorter in the DCS group (ACS vs. DCS = 21.9 ± 5.3 vs. 18.8 ± 7.2 days, p = 0.031). Conclusions This study provided evidence that DCS might be effective for patients who underwent cardiac valve surgery. Digital chest drainage system (dpeaa)DE-He213 Analog chest drainage system (dpeaa)DE-He213 Cardiac surgery (dpeaa)DE-He213 Valve surgery (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sakurai, Shogo aut Enthalten in The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery Tōkyō : Springer Japan, 1998 70(2021), 7 vom: 29. Nov., Seite 619-623 (DE-627)539545104 (DE-600)2381600-4 1863-2092 nnns volume:70 year:2021 number:7 day:29 month:11 pages:619-623 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11748-021-01752-9 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 AR 70 2021 7 29 11 619-623
language	English
source	Enthalten in The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 70(2021), 7 vom: 29. Nov., Seite 619-623 volume:70 year:2021 number:7 day:29 month:11 pages:619-623
sourceStr	Enthalten in The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 70(2021), 7 vom: 29. Nov., Seite 619-623 volume:70 year:2021 number:7 day:29 month:11 pages:619-623
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Digital chest drainage system Analog chest drainage system Cardiac surgery Valve surgery
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Tamura, Kiyoshi @@aut@@ Sakurai, Shogo @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2021-11-29T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	539545104
id	SPR047329408
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR047329408</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230507211307.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220619s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11748-021-01752-9</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR047329408</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s11748-021-01752-9-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tamura, Kiyoshi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-2335-1199</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Clinical efficacy of digital chest drainage system in cardiac valve surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery 2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Objects The portable digitalized suction was used widely in thoracic surgery. The aim of the study was to access the early outcomes of using the portable digitalized suction system after cardiac surgery. Methods We invested 80 patients including 30 women (mean age 72.7 ± 9.2 years) who underwent cardiac surgery at our hospital, excluded coronary artery bypass grafting only, with or only aortic surgery, emergency operation, and patients with hemodialysis. Patients were categorized as those treated with digital chest drainage system (DCS group, n = 38) or analog chest drainage system (ACS group, n = 42), and the following data were analyzed in two groups. The primary endpoint was the duration of chest drainage, and the secondary endpoints were the rate of drainage-related complications and the length of hospitalization. Results The duration of drainage was significantly shorter in the DCS group (ACS vs. DCS = 94.8 ± 31.5 vs. 81.1 ± 20.6 h, p = 0.036). The duration needed for rehabilitation completion was significantly shorter in the DCS group (ACS vs. DCS = 10.7 ± 1.2 vs. 9.6 ± 1.5 days, p = 0.047), and the length of hospitalization was significantly shorter in the DCS group (ACS vs. DCS = 21.9 ± 5.3 vs. 18.8 ± 7.2 days, p = 0.031). Conclusions This study provided evidence that DCS might be effective for patients who underwent cardiac valve surgery.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Digital chest drainage system</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Analog chest drainage system</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cardiac surgery</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Valve surgery</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sakurai, Shogo</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery</subfield><subfield code="d">Tōkyō : Springer Japan, 1998</subfield><subfield code="g">70(2021), 7 vom: 29. Nov., Seite 619-623</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)539545104</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2381600-4</subfield><subfield code="x">1863-2092</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:70</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:7</subfield><subfield code="g">day:29</subfield><subfield code="g">month:11</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:619-623</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11748-021-01752-9</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">70</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">7</subfield><subfield code="b">29</subfield><subfield code="c">11</subfield><subfield code="h">619-623</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Tamura, Kiyoshi
spellingShingle	Tamura, Kiyoshi misc Digital chest drainage system misc Analog chest drainage system misc Cardiac surgery misc Valve surgery Clinical efficacy of digital chest drainage system in cardiac valve surgery
authorStr	Tamura, Kiyoshi
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)539545104
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut
collection	springer
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	1863-2092
topic_title	Clinical efficacy of digital chest drainage system in cardiac valve surgery Digital chest drainage system (dpeaa)DE-He213 Analog chest drainage system (dpeaa)DE-He213 Cardiac surgery (dpeaa)DE-He213 Valve surgery (dpeaa)DE-He213
topic	misc Digital chest drainage system misc Analog chest drainage system misc Cardiac surgery misc Valve surgery
topic_unstemmed	misc Digital chest drainage system misc Analog chest drainage system misc Cardiac surgery misc Valve surgery
topic_browse	misc Digital chest drainage system misc Analog chest drainage system misc Cardiac surgery misc Valve surgery
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
hierarchy_parent_id	539545104
hierarchy_top_title	The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)539545104 (DE-600)2381600-4
title	Clinical efficacy of digital chest drainage system in cardiac valve surgery
ctrlnum	(DE-627)SPR047329408 (SPR)s11748-021-01752-9-e
title_full	Clinical efficacy of digital chest drainage system in cardiac valve surgery
author_sort	Tamura, Kiyoshi
journal	The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
journalStr	The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2021
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	619
author_browse	Tamura, Kiyoshi Sakurai, Shogo
container_volume	70
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Tamura, Kiyoshi
doi_str_mv	10.1007/s11748-021-01752-9
normlink	(ORCID)0000-0003-2335-1199
normlink_prefix_str_mv	(orcid)0000-0003-2335-1199
title_sort	clinical efficacy of digital chest drainage system in cardiac valve surgery
title_auth	Clinical efficacy of digital chest drainage system in cardiac valve surgery
abstract	Objects The portable digitalized suction was used widely in thoracic surgery. The aim of the study was to access the early outcomes of using the portable digitalized suction system after cardiac surgery. Methods We invested 80 patients including 30 women (mean age 72.7 ± 9.2 years) who underwent cardiac surgery at our hospital, excluded coronary artery bypass grafting only, with or only aortic surgery, emergency operation, and patients with hemodialysis. Patients were categorized as those treated with digital chest drainage system (DCS group, n = 38) or analog chest drainage system (ACS group, n = 42), and the following data were analyzed in two groups. The primary endpoint was the duration of chest drainage, and the secondary endpoints were the rate of drainage-related complications and the length of hospitalization. Results The duration of drainage was significantly shorter in the DCS group (ACS vs. DCS = 94.8 ± 31.5 vs. 81.1 ± 20.6 h, p = 0.036). The duration needed for rehabilitation completion was significantly shorter in the DCS group (ACS vs. DCS = 10.7 ± 1.2 vs. 9.6 ± 1.5 days, p = 0.047), and the length of hospitalization was significantly shorter in the DCS group (ACS vs. DCS = 21.9 ± 5.3 vs. 18.8 ± 7.2 days, p = 0.031). Conclusions This study provided evidence that DCS might be effective for patients who underwent cardiac valve surgery. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery 2021
abstractGer	Objects The portable digitalized suction was used widely in thoracic surgery. The aim of the study was to access the early outcomes of using the portable digitalized suction system after cardiac surgery. Methods We invested 80 patients including 30 women (mean age 72.7 ± 9.2 years) who underwent cardiac surgery at our hospital, excluded coronary artery bypass grafting only, with or only aortic surgery, emergency operation, and patients with hemodialysis. Patients were categorized as those treated with digital chest drainage system (DCS group, n = 38) or analog chest drainage system (ACS group, n = 42), and the following data were analyzed in two groups. The primary endpoint was the duration of chest drainage, and the secondary endpoints were the rate of drainage-related complications and the length of hospitalization. Results The duration of drainage was significantly shorter in the DCS group (ACS vs. DCS = 94.8 ± 31.5 vs. 81.1 ± 20.6 h, p = 0.036). The duration needed for rehabilitation completion was significantly shorter in the DCS group (ACS vs. DCS = 10.7 ± 1.2 vs. 9.6 ± 1.5 days, p = 0.047), and the length of hospitalization was significantly shorter in the DCS group (ACS vs. DCS = 21.9 ± 5.3 vs. 18.8 ± 7.2 days, p = 0.031). Conclusions This study provided evidence that DCS might be effective for patients who underwent cardiac valve surgery. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery 2021
abstract_unstemmed	Objects The portable digitalized suction was used widely in thoracic surgery. The aim of the study was to access the early outcomes of using the portable digitalized suction system after cardiac surgery. Methods We invested 80 patients including 30 women (mean age 72.7 ± 9.2 years) who underwent cardiac surgery at our hospital, excluded coronary artery bypass grafting only, with or only aortic surgery, emergency operation, and patients with hemodialysis. Patients were categorized as those treated with digital chest drainage system (DCS group, n = 38) or analog chest drainage system (ACS group, n = 42), and the following data were analyzed in two groups. The primary endpoint was the duration of chest drainage, and the secondary endpoints were the rate of drainage-related complications and the length of hospitalization. Results The duration of drainage was significantly shorter in the DCS group (ACS vs. DCS = 94.8 ± 31.5 vs. 81.1 ± 20.6 h, p = 0.036). The duration needed for rehabilitation completion was significantly shorter in the DCS group (ACS vs. DCS = 10.7 ± 1.2 vs. 9.6 ± 1.5 days, p = 0.047), and the length of hospitalization was significantly shorter in the DCS group (ACS vs. DCS = 21.9 ± 5.3 vs. 18.8 ± 7.2 days, p = 0.031). Conclusions This study provided evidence that DCS might be effective for patients who underwent cardiac valve surgery. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery 2021
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702
container_issue	7
title_short	Clinical efficacy of digital chest drainage system in cardiac valve surgery
url	https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11748-021-01752-9
remote_bool	true
author2	Sakurai, Shogo
author2Str	Sakurai, Shogo
ppnlink	539545104
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1007/s11748-021-01752-9
up_date	2024-07-04T02:45:11.901Z
_version_	1803614800474800128
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR047329408</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230507211307.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220619s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11748-021-01752-9</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR047329408</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s11748-021-01752-9-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tamura, Kiyoshi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-2335-1199</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Clinical efficacy of digital chest drainage system in cardiac valve surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery 2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Objects The portable digitalized suction was used widely in thoracic surgery. The aim of the study was to access the early outcomes of using the portable digitalized suction system after cardiac surgery. Methods We invested 80 patients including 30 women (mean age 72.7 ± 9.2 years) who underwent cardiac surgery at our hospital, excluded coronary artery bypass grafting only, with or only aortic surgery, emergency operation, and patients with hemodialysis. Patients were categorized as those treated with digital chest drainage system (DCS group, n = 38) or analog chest drainage system (ACS group, n = 42), and the following data were analyzed in two groups. The primary endpoint was the duration of chest drainage, and the secondary endpoints were the rate of drainage-related complications and the length of hospitalization. Results The duration of drainage was significantly shorter in the DCS group (ACS vs. DCS = 94.8 ± 31.5 vs. 81.1 ± 20.6 h, p = 0.036). The duration needed for rehabilitation completion was significantly shorter in the DCS group (ACS vs. DCS = 10.7 ± 1.2 vs. 9.6 ± 1.5 days, p = 0.047), and the length of hospitalization was significantly shorter in the DCS group (ACS vs. DCS = 21.9 ± 5.3 vs. 18.8 ± 7.2 days, p = 0.031). Conclusions This study provided evidence that DCS might be effective for patients who underwent cardiac valve surgery.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Digital chest drainage system</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Analog chest drainage system</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cardiac surgery</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Valve surgery</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sakurai, Shogo</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery</subfield><subfield code="d">Tōkyō : Springer Japan, 1998</subfield><subfield code="g">70(2021), 7 vom: 29. Nov., Seite 619-623</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)539545104</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2381600-4</subfield><subfield code="x">1863-2092</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:70</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:7</subfield><subfield code="g">day:29</subfield><subfield code="g">month:11</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:619-623</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11748-021-01752-9</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">70</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">7</subfield><subfield code="b">29</subfield><subfield code="c">11</subfield><subfield code="h">619-623</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.4011116

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Clinical efficacy of digital chest drainage system in cardiac valve surgery

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?