Barbed Sutures for Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Have Shorter Wound Closure Time and are Cost-Effective in Comparison to Traditional Sutures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 16 Randomized Controlled Trials

Purpose Surgical wound closure is of paramount importance, especially in total joint replacement surgeries wherein correct closure technique not only aids in rapid healing, but with lesser complications, we would be looking at a quicker rehabilitation of the patients. Bidirectional barbed sutures ap...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Purpose Surgical wound closure is of paramount importance, especially in total joint replacement surgeries wherein correct closure technique not only aids in rapid healing, but with lesser complications, we would be looking at a quicker rehabilitation of the patients. Bidirectional barbed sutures appear to reduce the wound closure time in all the planes and are cost-effective in comparison with traditional sutures. This study is aimed at evaluating the efficacy and superiority of bidirectional barbed sutures in comparison to traditional suturing techniques. Methods Electronic databases like Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Lilacs were searched up to February 2021. 16 high-quality randomized-controlled trials (RCT) were selected in this study. The search method identified 2168 total knee replacements (TKR) and 229 total hip replacements (THR) among 2397 patients. All the studies compared barbed sutures with traditional wound closure techniques. Data of wound closure time, overall cost, length of hospital stay, overall wound complications, suture-related complications, range of motion data, and knee society scores were collected and further analyzed. Results The baseline patient characteristics were identical among all the included studies. Compared to traditional sutures a significantly decreased wound closure time in both THR and TKRs (p < 0.00001) and cost (p < 0.00001) was noted, although no statistically significant difference was found in overall complications in THRs (p = 0.95) and TKRs (p = 0.69). ROM (p = 0.54—6 weeks after surgery and p = 0.68—3 months after surgery) and Knee society scores (p = 0.92) in both the groups of patients undergoing TKR. However, the length of hospital stay was prolonged in the barbed suture group (p = 0.01), pinpricks (p = 0.02), and broken sutures (p = 0.02). Conclusions Novel methods of wound closure such as barbed sutures achieve satisfactory surgical implementation being more efficient in the form of decreasing the overall wound closure time, with comparable wound complication rates and being cost-effective. But the drawbacks like the incidence of broken sutures and pinpricks are more. Overall using barbed sutures in place of traditional sutures may be considered safe and a viable alternative choice for suturing in total joint replacements. Level of Evidence Level I, Systematic review and Meta-analysis of RCT. Ausführliche Beschreibung

Autor*in:	Raja, Balgovind S. [verfasserIn] Gowda, Aditya K. S. Choudhury, Arghya Kundu Paul, Souvik Kalia, Roop Bhushan

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2022

Schlagwörter:	Total knee arthroplasty Total hip arthroplasty Barbed suture Wound closure time Wound complications Cost-efficacy Wound closure

Anmerkung:	© Indian Orthopaedics Association 2022

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Indian journal of orthopaedics - Varanasi : Assoc., 2004, 56(2022), 7 vom: 26. Apr., Seite 1156-1173
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:56 ; year:2022 ; number:7 ; day:26 ; month:04 ; pages:1156-1173

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.1007/s43465-022-00638-z

Katalog-ID:	SPR047405163