Sexual differences in responses of meadow voles to environmental cues in the presence of mink odor
Abstract In rodents, defensive behaviors increase the chances of survival during a predator encounter. Observable rodent defensive behaviors have been shown to be influenced by the presence of predator odors and nearby environmental cues such as cover, odors from conspecifics and food availability....
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Midlick, David M. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Animal Cognition - Springer-Verlag, 1998, 25(2022), 4 vom: 21. Feb., Seite 1003-1011 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:25 ; year:2022 ; number:4 ; day:21 ; month:02 ; pages:1003-1011 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s10071-022-01606-8 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR04770442X |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR04770442X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230508003707.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220729s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10071-022-01606-8 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR04770442X | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)s10071-022-01606-8-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Midlick, David M. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Sexual differences in responses of meadow voles to environmental cues in the presence of mink odor |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022 | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract In rodents, defensive behaviors increase the chances of survival during a predator encounter. Observable rodent defensive behaviors have been shown to be influenced by the presence of predator odors and nearby environmental cues such as cover, odors from conspecifics and food availability. Our experiment tested whether a predator scent cue influenced refuge preference in meadow voles within a laboratory setting. We placed voles in an experimental apparatus with bedding soaked in mink scent versus olive oil as a control across from four tubes that either contained (a) a dark plastic covering, (b) opposite-sex conspecific odor, (c) a food pellet, or (d) an empty, unscented space. A three-way interaction of tube contents, subject sex, and the presence of mink or olive oil on the preference of meadow voles to spend time in each area of the experimental apparatus and their latency to enter each area of the apparatus revealed sex differences in the environmental preference of meadow voles facing the risk of predation. The environmental preference of female, but not male, meadow voles was altered by the presence of mink urine or olive oil. A similar trend was found in the latency of males and females to enter each area of the experimental apparatus. These differences suggest that each sex utilizes different methods to increase their fitness when experiencing a predation risk. The observed sex differences may be explained by the natural history of voles owing to the differences in territorial range and the dynamics of evasion of terrestrial predators. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Mink |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Predation |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Evasion |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Environmental cues |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Predator scent |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Garris, Sarah S. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rohrer, Karl N. |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ferkin, Michael H. |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Animal Cognition |d Springer-Verlag, 1998 |g 25(2022), 4 vom: 21. Feb., Seite 1003-1011 |w (DE-627)SPR008564442 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:25 |g year:2022 |g number:4 |g day:21 |g month:02 |g pages:1003-1011 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-022-01606-8 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 25 |j 2022 |e 4 |b 21 |c 02 |h 1003-1011 | ||
| author_variant |
d m m dm dmm s s g ss ssg k n r kn knr m h f mh mhf |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
midlickdavidmgarrissarahsrohrerkarlnferk:2022----:eulifrneirsossfedwoetevrnetlus |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s10071-022-01606-8 doi (DE-627)SPR04770442X (SPR)s10071-022-01606-8-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Midlick, David M. verfasserin aut Sexual differences in responses of meadow voles to environmental cues in the presence of mink odor 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022 Abstract In rodents, defensive behaviors increase the chances of survival during a predator encounter. Observable rodent defensive behaviors have been shown to be influenced by the presence of predator odors and nearby environmental cues such as cover, odors from conspecifics and food availability. Our experiment tested whether a predator scent cue influenced refuge preference in meadow voles within a laboratory setting. We placed voles in an experimental apparatus with bedding soaked in mink scent versus olive oil as a control across from four tubes that either contained (a) a dark plastic covering, (b) opposite-sex conspecific odor, (c) a food pellet, or (d) an empty, unscented space. A three-way interaction of tube contents, subject sex, and the presence of mink or olive oil on the preference of meadow voles to spend time in each area of the experimental apparatus and their latency to enter each area of the apparatus revealed sex differences in the environmental preference of meadow voles facing the risk of predation. The environmental preference of female, but not male, meadow voles was altered by the presence of mink urine or olive oil. A similar trend was found in the latency of males and females to enter each area of the experimental apparatus. These differences suggest that each sex utilizes different methods to increase their fitness when experiencing a predation risk. The observed sex differences may be explained by the natural history of voles owing to the differences in territorial range and the dynamics of evasion of terrestrial predators. Mink (dpeaa)DE-He213 Predation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Evasion (dpeaa)DE-He213 Environmental cues (dpeaa)DE-He213 Predator scent (dpeaa)DE-He213 Garris, Sarah S. aut Rohrer, Karl N. aut Ferkin, Michael H. aut Enthalten in Animal Cognition Springer-Verlag, 1998 25(2022), 4 vom: 21. Feb., Seite 1003-1011 (DE-627)SPR008564442 nnns volume:25 year:2022 number:4 day:21 month:02 pages:1003-1011 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-022-01606-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 25 2022 4 21 02 1003-1011 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s10071-022-01606-8 doi (DE-627)SPR04770442X (SPR)s10071-022-01606-8-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Midlick, David M. verfasserin aut Sexual differences in responses of meadow voles to environmental cues in the presence of mink odor 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022 Abstract In rodents, defensive behaviors increase the chances of survival during a predator encounter. Observable rodent defensive behaviors have been shown to be influenced by the presence of predator odors and nearby environmental cues such as cover, odors from conspecifics and food availability. Our experiment tested whether a predator scent cue influenced refuge preference in meadow voles within a laboratory setting. We placed voles in an experimental apparatus with bedding soaked in mink scent versus olive oil as a control across from four tubes that either contained (a) a dark plastic covering, (b) opposite-sex conspecific odor, (c) a food pellet, or (d) an empty, unscented space. A three-way interaction of tube contents, subject sex, and the presence of mink or olive oil on the preference of meadow voles to spend time in each area of the experimental apparatus and their latency to enter each area of the apparatus revealed sex differences in the environmental preference of meadow voles facing the risk of predation. The environmental preference of female, but not male, meadow voles was altered by the presence of mink urine or olive oil. A similar trend was found in the latency of males and females to enter each area of the experimental apparatus. These differences suggest that each sex utilizes different methods to increase their fitness when experiencing a predation risk. The observed sex differences may be explained by the natural history of voles owing to the differences in territorial range and the dynamics of evasion of terrestrial predators. Mink (dpeaa)DE-He213 Predation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Evasion (dpeaa)DE-He213 Environmental cues (dpeaa)DE-He213 Predator scent (dpeaa)DE-He213 Garris, Sarah S. aut Rohrer, Karl N. aut Ferkin, Michael H. aut Enthalten in Animal Cognition Springer-Verlag, 1998 25(2022), 4 vom: 21. Feb., Seite 1003-1011 (DE-627)SPR008564442 nnns volume:25 year:2022 number:4 day:21 month:02 pages:1003-1011 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-022-01606-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 25 2022 4 21 02 1003-1011 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s10071-022-01606-8 doi (DE-627)SPR04770442X (SPR)s10071-022-01606-8-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Midlick, David M. verfasserin aut Sexual differences in responses of meadow voles to environmental cues in the presence of mink odor 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022 Abstract In rodents, defensive behaviors increase the chances of survival during a predator encounter. Observable rodent defensive behaviors have been shown to be influenced by the presence of predator odors and nearby environmental cues such as cover, odors from conspecifics and food availability. Our experiment tested whether a predator scent cue influenced refuge preference in meadow voles within a laboratory setting. We placed voles in an experimental apparatus with bedding soaked in mink scent versus olive oil as a control across from four tubes that either contained (a) a dark plastic covering, (b) opposite-sex conspecific odor, (c) a food pellet, or (d) an empty, unscented space. A three-way interaction of tube contents, subject sex, and the presence of mink or olive oil on the preference of meadow voles to spend time in each area of the experimental apparatus and their latency to enter each area of the apparatus revealed sex differences in the environmental preference of meadow voles facing the risk of predation. The environmental preference of female, but not male, meadow voles was altered by the presence of mink urine or olive oil. A similar trend was found in the latency of males and females to enter each area of the experimental apparatus. These differences suggest that each sex utilizes different methods to increase their fitness when experiencing a predation risk. The observed sex differences may be explained by the natural history of voles owing to the differences in territorial range and the dynamics of evasion of terrestrial predators. Mink (dpeaa)DE-He213 Predation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Evasion (dpeaa)DE-He213 Environmental cues (dpeaa)DE-He213 Predator scent (dpeaa)DE-He213 Garris, Sarah S. aut Rohrer, Karl N. aut Ferkin, Michael H. aut Enthalten in Animal Cognition Springer-Verlag, 1998 25(2022), 4 vom: 21. Feb., Seite 1003-1011 (DE-627)SPR008564442 nnns volume:25 year:2022 number:4 day:21 month:02 pages:1003-1011 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-022-01606-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 25 2022 4 21 02 1003-1011 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s10071-022-01606-8 doi (DE-627)SPR04770442X (SPR)s10071-022-01606-8-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Midlick, David M. verfasserin aut Sexual differences in responses of meadow voles to environmental cues in the presence of mink odor 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022 Abstract In rodents, defensive behaviors increase the chances of survival during a predator encounter. Observable rodent defensive behaviors have been shown to be influenced by the presence of predator odors and nearby environmental cues such as cover, odors from conspecifics and food availability. Our experiment tested whether a predator scent cue influenced refuge preference in meadow voles within a laboratory setting. We placed voles in an experimental apparatus with bedding soaked in mink scent versus olive oil as a control across from four tubes that either contained (a) a dark plastic covering, (b) opposite-sex conspecific odor, (c) a food pellet, or (d) an empty, unscented space. A three-way interaction of tube contents, subject sex, and the presence of mink or olive oil on the preference of meadow voles to spend time in each area of the experimental apparatus and their latency to enter each area of the apparatus revealed sex differences in the environmental preference of meadow voles facing the risk of predation. The environmental preference of female, but not male, meadow voles was altered by the presence of mink urine or olive oil. A similar trend was found in the latency of males and females to enter each area of the experimental apparatus. These differences suggest that each sex utilizes different methods to increase their fitness when experiencing a predation risk. The observed sex differences may be explained by the natural history of voles owing to the differences in territorial range and the dynamics of evasion of terrestrial predators. Mink (dpeaa)DE-He213 Predation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Evasion (dpeaa)DE-He213 Environmental cues (dpeaa)DE-He213 Predator scent (dpeaa)DE-He213 Garris, Sarah S. aut Rohrer, Karl N. aut Ferkin, Michael H. aut Enthalten in Animal Cognition Springer-Verlag, 1998 25(2022), 4 vom: 21. Feb., Seite 1003-1011 (DE-627)SPR008564442 nnns volume:25 year:2022 number:4 day:21 month:02 pages:1003-1011 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-022-01606-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 25 2022 4 21 02 1003-1011 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s10071-022-01606-8 doi (DE-627)SPR04770442X (SPR)s10071-022-01606-8-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Midlick, David M. verfasserin aut Sexual differences in responses of meadow voles to environmental cues in the presence of mink odor 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022 Abstract In rodents, defensive behaviors increase the chances of survival during a predator encounter. Observable rodent defensive behaviors have been shown to be influenced by the presence of predator odors and nearby environmental cues such as cover, odors from conspecifics and food availability. Our experiment tested whether a predator scent cue influenced refuge preference in meadow voles within a laboratory setting. We placed voles in an experimental apparatus with bedding soaked in mink scent versus olive oil as a control across from four tubes that either contained (a) a dark plastic covering, (b) opposite-sex conspecific odor, (c) a food pellet, or (d) an empty, unscented space. A three-way interaction of tube contents, subject sex, and the presence of mink or olive oil on the preference of meadow voles to spend time in each area of the experimental apparatus and their latency to enter each area of the apparatus revealed sex differences in the environmental preference of meadow voles facing the risk of predation. The environmental preference of female, but not male, meadow voles was altered by the presence of mink urine or olive oil. A similar trend was found in the latency of males and females to enter each area of the experimental apparatus. These differences suggest that each sex utilizes different methods to increase their fitness when experiencing a predation risk. The observed sex differences may be explained by the natural history of voles owing to the differences in territorial range and the dynamics of evasion of terrestrial predators. Mink (dpeaa)DE-He213 Predation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Evasion (dpeaa)DE-He213 Environmental cues (dpeaa)DE-He213 Predator scent (dpeaa)DE-He213 Garris, Sarah S. aut Rohrer, Karl N. aut Ferkin, Michael H. aut Enthalten in Animal Cognition Springer-Verlag, 1998 25(2022), 4 vom: 21. Feb., Seite 1003-1011 (DE-627)SPR008564442 nnns volume:25 year:2022 number:4 day:21 month:02 pages:1003-1011 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-022-01606-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 25 2022 4 21 02 1003-1011 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Animal Cognition 25(2022), 4 vom: 21. Feb., Seite 1003-1011 volume:25 year:2022 number:4 day:21 month:02 pages:1003-1011 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Animal Cognition 25(2022), 4 vom: 21. Feb., Seite 1003-1011 volume:25 year:2022 number:4 day:21 month:02 pages:1003-1011 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Mink Predation Evasion Environmental cues Predator scent |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Animal Cognition |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Midlick, David M. @@aut@@ Garris, Sarah S. @@aut@@ Rohrer, Karl N. @@aut@@ Ferkin, Michael H. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-02-21T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
SPR008564442 |
| id |
SPR04770442X |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR04770442X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230508003707.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220729s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10071-022-01606-8</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR04770442X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s10071-022-01606-8-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Midlick, David M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Sexual differences in responses of meadow voles to environmental cues in the presence of mink odor</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract In rodents, defensive behaviors increase the chances of survival during a predator encounter. Observable rodent defensive behaviors have been shown to be influenced by the presence of predator odors and nearby environmental cues such as cover, odors from conspecifics and food availability. Our experiment tested whether a predator scent cue influenced refuge preference in meadow voles within a laboratory setting. We placed voles in an experimental apparatus with bedding soaked in mink scent versus olive oil as a control across from four tubes that either contained (a) a dark plastic covering, (b) opposite-sex conspecific odor, (c) a food pellet, or (d) an empty, unscented space. A three-way interaction of tube contents, subject sex, and the presence of mink or olive oil on the preference of meadow voles to spend time in each area of the experimental apparatus and their latency to enter each area of the apparatus revealed sex differences in the environmental preference of meadow voles facing the risk of predation. The environmental preference of female, but not male, meadow voles was altered by the presence of mink urine or olive oil. A similar trend was found in the latency of males and females to enter each area of the experimental apparatus. These differences suggest that each sex utilizes different methods to increase their fitness when experiencing a predation risk. The observed sex differences may be explained by the natural history of voles owing to the differences in territorial range and the dynamics of evasion of terrestrial predators.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Mink</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Predation</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evasion</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Environmental cues</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Predator scent</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Garris, Sarah S.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rohrer, Karl N.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ferkin, Michael H.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Animal Cognition</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1998</subfield><subfield code="g">25(2022), 4 vom: 21. Feb., Seite 1003-1011</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR008564442</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:25</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">day:21</subfield><subfield code="g">month:02</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1003-1011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-022-01606-8</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">25</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="b">21</subfield><subfield code="c">02</subfield><subfield code="h">1003-1011</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Midlick, David M. |
| spellingShingle |
Midlick, David M. misc Mink misc Predation misc Evasion misc Environmental cues misc Predator scent Sexual differences in responses of meadow voles to environmental cues in the presence of mink odor |
| authorStr |
Midlick, David M. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)SPR008564442 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
Sexual differences in responses of meadow voles to environmental cues in the presence of mink odor Mink (dpeaa)DE-He213 Predation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Evasion (dpeaa)DE-He213 Environmental cues (dpeaa)DE-He213 Predator scent (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
misc Mink misc Predation misc Evasion misc Environmental cues misc Predator scent |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Mink misc Predation misc Evasion misc Environmental cues misc Predator scent |
| topic_browse |
misc Mink misc Predation misc Evasion misc Environmental cues misc Predator scent |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Animal Cognition |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
SPR008564442 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Animal Cognition |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)SPR008564442 |
| title |
Sexual differences in responses of meadow voles to environmental cues in the presence of mink odor |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR04770442X (SPR)s10071-022-01606-8-e |
| title_full |
Sexual differences in responses of meadow voles to environmental cues in the presence of mink odor |
| author_sort |
Midlick, David M. |
| journal |
Animal Cognition |
| journalStr |
Animal Cognition |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2022 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
1003 |
| author_browse |
Midlick, David M. Garris, Sarah S. Rohrer, Karl N. Ferkin, Michael H. |
| container_volume |
25 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Midlick, David M. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s10071-022-01606-8 |
| title_sort |
sexual differences in responses of meadow voles to environmental cues in the presence of mink odor |
| title_auth |
Sexual differences in responses of meadow voles to environmental cues in the presence of mink odor |
| abstract |
Abstract In rodents, defensive behaviors increase the chances of survival during a predator encounter. Observable rodent defensive behaviors have been shown to be influenced by the presence of predator odors and nearby environmental cues such as cover, odors from conspecifics and food availability. Our experiment tested whether a predator scent cue influenced refuge preference in meadow voles within a laboratory setting. We placed voles in an experimental apparatus with bedding soaked in mink scent versus olive oil as a control across from four tubes that either contained (a) a dark plastic covering, (b) opposite-sex conspecific odor, (c) a food pellet, or (d) an empty, unscented space. A three-way interaction of tube contents, subject sex, and the presence of mink or olive oil on the preference of meadow voles to spend time in each area of the experimental apparatus and their latency to enter each area of the apparatus revealed sex differences in the environmental preference of meadow voles facing the risk of predation. The environmental preference of female, but not male, meadow voles was altered by the presence of mink urine or olive oil. A similar trend was found in the latency of males and females to enter each area of the experimental apparatus. These differences suggest that each sex utilizes different methods to increase their fitness when experiencing a predation risk. The observed sex differences may be explained by the natural history of voles owing to the differences in territorial range and the dynamics of evasion of terrestrial predators. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022 |
| abstractGer |
Abstract In rodents, defensive behaviors increase the chances of survival during a predator encounter. Observable rodent defensive behaviors have been shown to be influenced by the presence of predator odors and nearby environmental cues such as cover, odors from conspecifics and food availability. Our experiment tested whether a predator scent cue influenced refuge preference in meadow voles within a laboratory setting. We placed voles in an experimental apparatus with bedding soaked in mink scent versus olive oil as a control across from four tubes that either contained (a) a dark plastic covering, (b) opposite-sex conspecific odor, (c) a food pellet, or (d) an empty, unscented space. A three-way interaction of tube contents, subject sex, and the presence of mink or olive oil on the preference of meadow voles to spend time in each area of the experimental apparatus and their latency to enter each area of the apparatus revealed sex differences in the environmental preference of meadow voles facing the risk of predation. The environmental preference of female, but not male, meadow voles was altered by the presence of mink urine or olive oil. A similar trend was found in the latency of males and females to enter each area of the experimental apparatus. These differences suggest that each sex utilizes different methods to increase their fitness when experiencing a predation risk. The observed sex differences may be explained by the natural history of voles owing to the differences in territorial range and the dynamics of evasion of terrestrial predators. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract In rodents, defensive behaviors increase the chances of survival during a predator encounter. Observable rodent defensive behaviors have been shown to be influenced by the presence of predator odors and nearby environmental cues such as cover, odors from conspecifics and food availability. Our experiment tested whether a predator scent cue influenced refuge preference in meadow voles within a laboratory setting. We placed voles in an experimental apparatus with bedding soaked in mink scent versus olive oil as a control across from four tubes that either contained (a) a dark plastic covering, (b) opposite-sex conspecific odor, (c) a food pellet, or (d) an empty, unscented space. A three-way interaction of tube contents, subject sex, and the presence of mink or olive oil on the preference of meadow voles to spend time in each area of the experimental apparatus and their latency to enter each area of the apparatus revealed sex differences in the environmental preference of meadow voles facing the risk of predation. The environmental preference of female, but not male, meadow voles was altered by the presence of mink urine or olive oil. A similar trend was found in the latency of males and females to enter each area of the experimental apparatus. These differences suggest that each sex utilizes different methods to increase their fitness when experiencing a predation risk. The observed sex differences may be explained by the natural history of voles owing to the differences in territorial range and the dynamics of evasion of terrestrial predators. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER |
| container_issue |
4 |
| title_short |
Sexual differences in responses of meadow voles to environmental cues in the presence of mink odor |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-022-01606-8 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Garris, Sarah S. Rohrer, Karl N. Ferkin, Michael H. |
| author2Str |
Garris, Sarah S. Rohrer, Karl N. Ferkin, Michael H. |
| ppnlink |
SPR008564442 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s10071-022-01606-8 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T14:27:14.723Z |
| _version_ |
1803568372488601600 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR04770442X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230508003707.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220729s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10071-022-01606-8</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR04770442X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s10071-022-01606-8-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Midlick, David M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Sexual differences in responses of meadow voles to environmental cues in the presence of mink odor</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract In rodents, defensive behaviors increase the chances of survival during a predator encounter. Observable rodent defensive behaviors have been shown to be influenced by the presence of predator odors and nearby environmental cues such as cover, odors from conspecifics and food availability. Our experiment tested whether a predator scent cue influenced refuge preference in meadow voles within a laboratory setting. We placed voles in an experimental apparatus with bedding soaked in mink scent versus olive oil as a control across from four tubes that either contained (a) a dark plastic covering, (b) opposite-sex conspecific odor, (c) a food pellet, or (d) an empty, unscented space. A three-way interaction of tube contents, subject sex, and the presence of mink or olive oil on the preference of meadow voles to spend time in each area of the experimental apparatus and their latency to enter each area of the apparatus revealed sex differences in the environmental preference of meadow voles facing the risk of predation. The environmental preference of female, but not male, meadow voles was altered by the presence of mink urine or olive oil. A similar trend was found in the latency of males and females to enter each area of the experimental apparatus. These differences suggest that each sex utilizes different methods to increase their fitness when experiencing a predation risk. The observed sex differences may be explained by the natural history of voles owing to the differences in territorial range and the dynamics of evasion of terrestrial predators.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Mink</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Predation</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evasion</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Environmental cues</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Predator scent</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Garris, Sarah S.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rohrer, Karl N.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ferkin, Michael H.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Animal Cognition</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 1998</subfield><subfield code="g">25(2022), 4 vom: 21. Feb., Seite 1003-1011</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR008564442</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:25</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">day:21</subfield><subfield code="g">month:02</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1003-1011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-022-01606-8</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">25</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="b">21</subfield><subfield code="c">02</subfield><subfield code="h">1003-1011</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4026527 |