Test–retest reliability and practice effect of the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test
Abstract Visual diagnostic tests must have a high degree of consistency in their measurements (high reliability) to ensure accurate assessment of perceptual abilities. The current study assessed test–retest reliability and practice effects in the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test (L-POST...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Ding, Xiaotong [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2022 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Anmerkung: |
© The Author(s) 2021 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Behavior research methods, instruments & computers - Austin, Tex. : Psychonomic Society Publ., 1984, 54(2022), 5 vom: 11. Jan., Seite 2457-2462 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:54 ; year:2022 ; number:5 ; day:11 ; month:01 ; pages:2457-2462 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
SPR048391123 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | SPR048391123 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230509114116.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 221019s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)SPR048391123 | ||
035 | |a (SPR)s13428-021-01741-z-e | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Ding, Xiaotong |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Test–retest reliability and practice effect of the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © The Author(s) 2021 | ||
520 | |a Abstract Visual diagnostic tests must have a high degree of consistency in their measurements (high reliability) to ensure accurate assessment of perceptual abilities. The current study assessed test–retest reliability and practice effects in the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test (L-POST) in 144 healthy volunteers, with time intervals between 0 and 756 days. We used Pearson's and intraclass correlation analysis, Bland–Altman analysis and multilevel modelling. Results from our analyses converged and supported an adequate reliability of the L-POST. Multilevel modelling demonstrated an absence of practice effect, suggesting that the L-POST is suitable for repeat administration. This study suggests that the L-POST has adequate reliability and is suitable for repeat administration even at short intervals. This study provides the basis for a more systematic evaluation for neuropsychological assessments, which can lead to the development of more reliable assessment batteries. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Visual assessment |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a test-retest reliability |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Bland-Altman analysis |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Practice effect |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Intraclass correlation |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
700 | 1 | |a Vancleef, Kathleen |0 (orcid)0000-0002-9943-9341 |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Behavior research methods, instruments & computers |d Austin, Tex. : Psychonomic Society Publ., 1984 |g 54(2022), 5 vom: 11. Jan., Seite 2457-2462 |w (DE-627)32998067X |w (DE-600)2048669-8 |x 1532-5970 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:54 |g year:2022 |g number:5 |g day:11 |g month:01 |g pages:2457-2462 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_101 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_120 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_138 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_152 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_171 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_187 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_250 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_281 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 54 |j 2022 |e 5 |b 11 |c 01 |h 2457-2462 |
author_variant |
x d xd k v kv |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:15325970:2022----::eteeteibltadrciefetfhluepretaog |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
publishDate |
2022 |
allfields |
10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z doi (DE-627)SPR048391123 (SPR)s13428-021-01741-z-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Ding, Xiaotong verfasserin aut Test–retest reliability and practice effect of the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Visual diagnostic tests must have a high degree of consistency in their measurements (high reliability) to ensure accurate assessment of perceptual abilities. The current study assessed test–retest reliability and practice effects in the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test (L-POST) in 144 healthy volunteers, with time intervals between 0 and 756 days. We used Pearson's and intraclass correlation analysis, Bland–Altman analysis and multilevel modelling. Results from our analyses converged and supported an adequate reliability of the L-POST. Multilevel modelling demonstrated an absence of practice effect, suggesting that the L-POST is suitable for repeat administration. This study suggests that the L-POST has adequate reliability and is suitable for repeat administration even at short intervals. This study provides the basis for a more systematic evaluation for neuropsychological assessments, which can lead to the development of more reliable assessment batteries. Visual assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 test-retest reliability (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bland-Altman analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Practice effect (dpeaa)DE-He213 Intraclass correlation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Vancleef, Kathleen (orcid)0000-0002-9943-9341 aut Enthalten in Behavior research methods, instruments & computers Austin, Tex. : Psychonomic Society Publ., 1984 54(2022), 5 vom: 11. Jan., Seite 2457-2462 (DE-627)32998067X (DE-600)2048669-8 1532-5970 nnns volume:54 year:2022 number:5 day:11 month:01 pages:2457-2462 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2014 AR 54 2022 5 11 01 2457-2462 |
spelling |
10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z doi (DE-627)SPR048391123 (SPR)s13428-021-01741-z-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Ding, Xiaotong verfasserin aut Test–retest reliability and practice effect of the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Visual diagnostic tests must have a high degree of consistency in their measurements (high reliability) to ensure accurate assessment of perceptual abilities. The current study assessed test–retest reliability and practice effects in the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test (L-POST) in 144 healthy volunteers, with time intervals between 0 and 756 days. We used Pearson's and intraclass correlation analysis, Bland–Altman analysis and multilevel modelling. Results from our analyses converged and supported an adequate reliability of the L-POST. Multilevel modelling demonstrated an absence of practice effect, suggesting that the L-POST is suitable for repeat administration. This study suggests that the L-POST has adequate reliability and is suitable for repeat administration even at short intervals. This study provides the basis for a more systematic evaluation for neuropsychological assessments, which can lead to the development of more reliable assessment batteries. Visual assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 test-retest reliability (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bland-Altman analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Practice effect (dpeaa)DE-He213 Intraclass correlation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Vancleef, Kathleen (orcid)0000-0002-9943-9341 aut Enthalten in Behavior research methods, instruments & computers Austin, Tex. : Psychonomic Society Publ., 1984 54(2022), 5 vom: 11. Jan., Seite 2457-2462 (DE-627)32998067X (DE-600)2048669-8 1532-5970 nnns volume:54 year:2022 number:5 day:11 month:01 pages:2457-2462 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2014 AR 54 2022 5 11 01 2457-2462 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z doi (DE-627)SPR048391123 (SPR)s13428-021-01741-z-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Ding, Xiaotong verfasserin aut Test–retest reliability and practice effect of the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Visual diagnostic tests must have a high degree of consistency in their measurements (high reliability) to ensure accurate assessment of perceptual abilities. The current study assessed test–retest reliability and practice effects in the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test (L-POST) in 144 healthy volunteers, with time intervals between 0 and 756 days. We used Pearson's and intraclass correlation analysis, Bland–Altman analysis and multilevel modelling. Results from our analyses converged and supported an adequate reliability of the L-POST. Multilevel modelling demonstrated an absence of practice effect, suggesting that the L-POST is suitable for repeat administration. This study suggests that the L-POST has adequate reliability and is suitable for repeat administration even at short intervals. This study provides the basis for a more systematic evaluation for neuropsychological assessments, which can lead to the development of more reliable assessment batteries. Visual assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 test-retest reliability (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bland-Altman analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Practice effect (dpeaa)DE-He213 Intraclass correlation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Vancleef, Kathleen (orcid)0000-0002-9943-9341 aut Enthalten in Behavior research methods, instruments & computers Austin, Tex. : Psychonomic Society Publ., 1984 54(2022), 5 vom: 11. Jan., Seite 2457-2462 (DE-627)32998067X (DE-600)2048669-8 1532-5970 nnns volume:54 year:2022 number:5 day:11 month:01 pages:2457-2462 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2014 AR 54 2022 5 11 01 2457-2462 |
allfieldsGer |
10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z doi (DE-627)SPR048391123 (SPR)s13428-021-01741-z-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Ding, Xiaotong verfasserin aut Test–retest reliability and practice effect of the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Visual diagnostic tests must have a high degree of consistency in their measurements (high reliability) to ensure accurate assessment of perceptual abilities. The current study assessed test–retest reliability and practice effects in the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test (L-POST) in 144 healthy volunteers, with time intervals between 0 and 756 days. We used Pearson's and intraclass correlation analysis, Bland–Altman analysis and multilevel modelling. Results from our analyses converged and supported an adequate reliability of the L-POST. Multilevel modelling demonstrated an absence of practice effect, suggesting that the L-POST is suitable for repeat administration. This study suggests that the L-POST has adequate reliability and is suitable for repeat administration even at short intervals. This study provides the basis for a more systematic evaluation for neuropsychological assessments, which can lead to the development of more reliable assessment batteries. Visual assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 test-retest reliability (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bland-Altman analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Practice effect (dpeaa)DE-He213 Intraclass correlation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Vancleef, Kathleen (orcid)0000-0002-9943-9341 aut Enthalten in Behavior research methods, instruments & computers Austin, Tex. : Psychonomic Society Publ., 1984 54(2022), 5 vom: 11. Jan., Seite 2457-2462 (DE-627)32998067X (DE-600)2048669-8 1532-5970 nnns volume:54 year:2022 number:5 day:11 month:01 pages:2457-2462 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2014 AR 54 2022 5 11 01 2457-2462 |
allfieldsSound |
10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z doi (DE-627)SPR048391123 (SPR)s13428-021-01741-z-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Ding, Xiaotong verfasserin aut Test–retest reliability and practice effect of the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Visual diagnostic tests must have a high degree of consistency in their measurements (high reliability) to ensure accurate assessment of perceptual abilities. The current study assessed test–retest reliability and practice effects in the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test (L-POST) in 144 healthy volunteers, with time intervals between 0 and 756 days. We used Pearson's and intraclass correlation analysis, Bland–Altman analysis and multilevel modelling. Results from our analyses converged and supported an adequate reliability of the L-POST. Multilevel modelling demonstrated an absence of practice effect, suggesting that the L-POST is suitable for repeat administration. This study suggests that the L-POST has adequate reliability and is suitable for repeat administration even at short intervals. This study provides the basis for a more systematic evaluation for neuropsychological assessments, which can lead to the development of more reliable assessment batteries. Visual assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 test-retest reliability (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bland-Altman analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Practice effect (dpeaa)DE-He213 Intraclass correlation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Vancleef, Kathleen (orcid)0000-0002-9943-9341 aut Enthalten in Behavior research methods, instruments & computers Austin, Tex. : Psychonomic Society Publ., 1984 54(2022), 5 vom: 11. Jan., Seite 2457-2462 (DE-627)32998067X (DE-600)2048669-8 1532-5970 nnns volume:54 year:2022 number:5 day:11 month:01 pages:2457-2462 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2014 AR 54 2022 5 11 01 2457-2462 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Behavior research methods, instruments & computers 54(2022), 5 vom: 11. Jan., Seite 2457-2462 volume:54 year:2022 number:5 day:11 month:01 pages:2457-2462 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Behavior research methods, instruments & computers 54(2022), 5 vom: 11. Jan., Seite 2457-2462 volume:54 year:2022 number:5 day:11 month:01 pages:2457-2462 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Visual assessment test-retest reliability Bland-Altman analysis Practice effect Intraclass correlation |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Behavior research methods, instruments & computers |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Ding, Xiaotong @@aut@@ Vancleef, Kathleen @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-11T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
32998067X |
id |
SPR048391123 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR048391123</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230509114116.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221019s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR048391123</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s13428-021-01741-z-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ding, Xiaotong</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Test–retest reliability and practice effect of the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Visual diagnostic tests must have a high degree of consistency in their measurements (high reliability) to ensure accurate assessment of perceptual abilities. The current study assessed test–retest reliability and practice effects in the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test (L-POST) in 144 healthy volunteers, with time intervals between 0 and 756 days. We used Pearson's and intraclass correlation analysis, Bland–Altman analysis and multilevel modelling. Results from our analyses converged and supported an adequate reliability of the L-POST. Multilevel modelling demonstrated an absence of practice effect, suggesting that the L-POST is suitable for repeat administration. This study suggests that the L-POST has adequate reliability and is suitable for repeat administration even at short intervals. This study provides the basis for a more systematic evaluation for neuropsychological assessments, which can lead to the development of more reliable assessment batteries.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Visual assessment</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">test-retest reliability</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bland-Altman analysis</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Practice effect</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intraclass correlation</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vancleef, Kathleen</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-9943-9341</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Behavior research methods, instruments & computers</subfield><subfield code="d">Austin, Tex. : Psychonomic Society Publ., 1984</subfield><subfield code="g">54(2022), 5 vom: 11. Jan., Seite 2457-2462</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)32998067X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2048669-8</subfield><subfield code="x">1532-5970</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:54</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">day:11</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:2457-2462</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">54</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="b">11</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield><subfield code="h">2457-2462</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Ding, Xiaotong |
spellingShingle |
Ding, Xiaotong misc Visual assessment misc test-retest reliability misc Bland-Altman analysis misc Practice effect misc Intraclass correlation Test–retest reliability and practice effect of the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test |
authorStr |
Ding, Xiaotong |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)32998067X |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut |
collection |
springer |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1532-5970 |
topic_title |
Test–retest reliability and practice effect of the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test Visual assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 test-retest reliability (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bland-Altman analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Practice effect (dpeaa)DE-He213 Intraclass correlation (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
topic |
misc Visual assessment misc test-retest reliability misc Bland-Altman analysis misc Practice effect misc Intraclass correlation |
topic_unstemmed |
misc Visual assessment misc test-retest reliability misc Bland-Altman analysis misc Practice effect misc Intraclass correlation |
topic_browse |
misc Visual assessment misc test-retest reliability misc Bland-Altman analysis misc Practice effect misc Intraclass correlation |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Behavior research methods, instruments & computers |
hierarchy_parent_id |
32998067X |
hierarchy_top_title |
Behavior research methods, instruments & computers |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)32998067X (DE-600)2048669-8 |
title |
Test–retest reliability and practice effect of the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR048391123 (SPR)s13428-021-01741-z-e |
title_full |
Test–retest reliability and practice effect of the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test |
author_sort |
Ding, Xiaotong |
journal |
Behavior research methods, instruments & computers |
journalStr |
Behavior research methods, instruments & computers |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2022 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
2457 |
author_browse |
Ding, Xiaotong Vancleef, Kathleen |
container_volume |
54 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Ding, Xiaotong |
doi_str_mv |
10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z |
normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0002-9943-9341 |
normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0002-9943-9341 |
title_sort |
test–retest reliability and practice effect of the leuven perceptual organisation screening test |
title_auth |
Test–retest reliability and practice effect of the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test |
abstract |
Abstract Visual diagnostic tests must have a high degree of consistency in their measurements (high reliability) to ensure accurate assessment of perceptual abilities. The current study assessed test–retest reliability and practice effects in the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test (L-POST) in 144 healthy volunteers, with time intervals between 0 and 756 days. We used Pearson's and intraclass correlation analysis, Bland–Altman analysis and multilevel modelling. Results from our analyses converged and supported an adequate reliability of the L-POST. Multilevel modelling demonstrated an absence of practice effect, suggesting that the L-POST is suitable for repeat administration. This study suggests that the L-POST has adequate reliability and is suitable for repeat administration even at short intervals. This study provides the basis for a more systematic evaluation for neuropsychological assessments, which can lead to the development of more reliable assessment batteries. © The Author(s) 2021 |
abstractGer |
Abstract Visual diagnostic tests must have a high degree of consistency in their measurements (high reliability) to ensure accurate assessment of perceptual abilities. The current study assessed test–retest reliability and practice effects in the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test (L-POST) in 144 healthy volunteers, with time intervals between 0 and 756 days. We used Pearson's and intraclass correlation analysis, Bland–Altman analysis and multilevel modelling. Results from our analyses converged and supported an adequate reliability of the L-POST. Multilevel modelling demonstrated an absence of practice effect, suggesting that the L-POST is suitable for repeat administration. This study suggests that the L-POST has adequate reliability and is suitable for repeat administration even at short intervals. This study provides the basis for a more systematic evaluation for neuropsychological assessments, which can lead to the development of more reliable assessment batteries. © The Author(s) 2021 |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Visual diagnostic tests must have a high degree of consistency in their measurements (high reliability) to ensure accurate assessment of perceptual abilities. The current study assessed test–retest reliability and practice effects in the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test (L-POST) in 144 healthy volunteers, with time intervals between 0 and 756 days. We used Pearson's and intraclass correlation analysis, Bland–Altman analysis and multilevel modelling. Results from our analyses converged and supported an adequate reliability of the L-POST. Multilevel modelling demonstrated an absence of practice effect, suggesting that the L-POST is suitable for repeat administration. This study suggests that the L-POST has adequate reliability and is suitable for repeat administration even at short intervals. This study provides the basis for a more systematic evaluation for neuropsychological assessments, which can lead to the development of more reliable assessment batteries. © The Author(s) 2021 |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2014 |
container_issue |
5 |
title_short |
Test–retest reliability and practice effect of the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test |
url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Vancleef, Kathleen |
author2Str |
Vancleef, Kathleen |
ppnlink |
32998067X |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z |
up_date |
2024-07-03T18:54:23.463Z |
_version_ |
1803585179839627264 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR048391123</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230509114116.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221019s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR048391123</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s13428-021-01741-z-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ding, Xiaotong</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Test–retest reliability and practice effect of the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Visual diagnostic tests must have a high degree of consistency in their measurements (high reliability) to ensure accurate assessment of perceptual abilities. The current study assessed test–retest reliability and practice effects in the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test (L-POST) in 144 healthy volunteers, with time intervals between 0 and 756 days. We used Pearson's and intraclass correlation analysis, Bland–Altman analysis and multilevel modelling. Results from our analyses converged and supported an adequate reliability of the L-POST. Multilevel modelling demonstrated an absence of practice effect, suggesting that the L-POST is suitable for repeat administration. This study suggests that the L-POST has adequate reliability and is suitable for repeat administration even at short intervals. This study provides the basis for a more systematic evaluation for neuropsychological assessments, which can lead to the development of more reliable assessment batteries.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Visual assessment</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">test-retest reliability</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bland-Altman analysis</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Practice effect</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intraclass correlation</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vancleef, Kathleen</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-9943-9341</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Behavior research methods, instruments & computers</subfield><subfield code="d">Austin, Tex. : Psychonomic Society Publ., 1984</subfield><subfield code="g">54(2022), 5 vom: 11. Jan., Seite 2457-2462</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)32998067X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2048669-8</subfield><subfield code="x">1532-5970</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:54</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">day:11</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:2457-2462</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">54</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="b">11</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield><subfield code="h">2457-2462</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3975353 |