Test–retest reliability and practice effect of the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test

Abstract Visual diagnostic tests must have a high degree of consistency in their measurements (high reliability) to ensure accurate assessment of perceptual abilities. The current study assessed test–retest reliability and practice effects in the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test (L-POST...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Ding, Xiaotong [verfasserIn] Vancleef, Kathleen

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2022

Schlagwörter:	Visual assessment test-retest reliability Bland-Altman analysis Practice effect Intraclass correlation

Anmerkung:	© The Author(s) 2021

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Behavior research methods, instruments & computers - Austin, Tex. : Psychonomic Society Publ., 1984, 54(2022), 5 vom: 11. Jan., Seite 2457-2462
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:54 ; year:2022 ; number:5 ; day:11 ; month:01 ; pages:2457-2462

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z

Katalog-ID:	SPR048391123

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	SPR048391123
003	DE-627
005	20230509114116.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	221019s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)SPR048391123
035			\|a (SPR)s13428-021-01741-z-e
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
100	1		\|a Ding, Xiaotong \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Test–retest reliability and practice effect of the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test
264		1	\|c 2022
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
500			\|a © The Author(s) 2021
520			\|a Abstract Visual diagnostic tests must have a high degree of consistency in their measurements (high reliability) to ensure accurate assessment of perceptual abilities. The current study assessed test–retest reliability and practice effects in the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test (L-POST) in 144 healthy volunteers, with time intervals between 0 and 756 days. We used Pearson's and intraclass correlation analysis, Bland–Altman analysis and multilevel modelling. Results from our analyses converged and supported an adequate reliability of the L-POST. Multilevel modelling demonstrated an absence of practice effect, suggesting that the L-POST is suitable for repeat administration. This study suggests that the L-POST has adequate reliability and is suitable for repeat administration even at short intervals. This study provides the basis for a more systematic evaluation for neuropsychological assessments, which can lead to the development of more reliable assessment batteries.
650		4	\|a Visual assessment \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a test-retest reliability \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Bland-Altman analysis \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Practice effect \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Intraclass correlation \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
700	1		\|a Vancleef, Kathleen \|0 (orcid)0000-0002-9943-9341 \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Behavior research methods, instruments & computers \|d Austin, Tex. : Psychonomic Society Publ., 1984 \|g 54(2022), 5 vom: 11. Jan., Seite 2457-2462 \|w (DE-627)32998067X \|w (DE-600)2048669-8 \|x 1532-5970 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:54 \|g year:2022 \|g number:5 \|g day:11 \|g month:01 \|g pages:2457-2462
856	4	0	\|u https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z \|z kostenfrei \|3 Volltext
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_SPRINGER
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_32
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_90
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_100
912			\|a GBV_ILN_101
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_120
912			\|a GBV_ILN_138
912			\|a GBV_ILN_152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_171
912			\|a GBV_ILN_187
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_250
912			\|a GBV_ILN_281
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 54 \|j 2022 \|e 5 \|b 11 \|c 01 \|h 2457-2462

Indexfelder

author_variant	x d xd k v kv
matchkey_str	article:15325970:2022----::eteeteibltadrciefetfhluepretaog
hierarchy_sort_str	2022
publishDate	2022
allfields	10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z doi (DE-627)SPR048391123 (SPR)s13428-021-01741-z-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Ding, Xiaotong verfasserin aut Test–retest reliability and practice effect of the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Visual diagnostic tests must have a high degree of consistency in their measurements (high reliability) to ensure accurate assessment of perceptual abilities. The current study assessed test–retest reliability and practice effects in the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test (L-POST) in 144 healthy volunteers, with time intervals between 0 and 756 days. We used Pearson's and intraclass correlation analysis, Bland–Altman analysis and multilevel modelling. Results from our analyses converged and supported an adequate reliability of the L-POST. Multilevel modelling demonstrated an absence of practice effect, suggesting that the L-POST is suitable for repeat administration. This study suggests that the L-POST has adequate reliability and is suitable for repeat administration even at short intervals. This study provides the basis for a more systematic evaluation for neuropsychological assessments, which can lead to the development of more reliable assessment batteries. Visual assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 test-retest reliability (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bland-Altman analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Practice effect (dpeaa)DE-He213 Intraclass correlation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Vancleef, Kathleen (orcid)0000-0002-9943-9341 aut Enthalten in Behavior research methods, instruments & computers Austin, Tex. : Psychonomic Society Publ., 1984 54(2022), 5 vom: 11. Jan., Seite 2457-2462 (DE-627)32998067X (DE-600)2048669-8 1532-5970 nnns volume:54 year:2022 number:5 day:11 month:01 pages:2457-2462 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2014 AR 54 2022 5 11 01 2457-2462
spelling	10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z doi (DE-627)SPR048391123 (SPR)s13428-021-01741-z-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Ding, Xiaotong verfasserin aut Test–retest reliability and practice effect of the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Visual diagnostic tests must have a high degree of consistency in their measurements (high reliability) to ensure accurate assessment of perceptual abilities. The current study assessed test–retest reliability and practice effects in the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test (L-POST) in 144 healthy volunteers, with time intervals between 0 and 756 days. We used Pearson's and intraclass correlation analysis, Bland–Altman analysis and multilevel modelling. Results from our analyses converged and supported an adequate reliability of the L-POST. Multilevel modelling demonstrated an absence of practice effect, suggesting that the L-POST is suitable for repeat administration. This study suggests that the L-POST has adequate reliability and is suitable for repeat administration even at short intervals. This study provides the basis for a more systematic evaluation for neuropsychological assessments, which can lead to the development of more reliable assessment batteries. Visual assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 test-retest reliability (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bland-Altman analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Practice effect (dpeaa)DE-He213 Intraclass correlation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Vancleef, Kathleen (orcid)0000-0002-9943-9341 aut Enthalten in Behavior research methods, instruments & computers Austin, Tex. : Psychonomic Society Publ., 1984 54(2022), 5 vom: 11. Jan., Seite 2457-2462 (DE-627)32998067X (DE-600)2048669-8 1532-5970 nnns volume:54 year:2022 number:5 day:11 month:01 pages:2457-2462 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2014 AR 54 2022 5 11 01 2457-2462
allfields_unstemmed	10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z doi (DE-627)SPR048391123 (SPR)s13428-021-01741-z-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Ding, Xiaotong verfasserin aut Test–retest reliability and practice effect of the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Visual diagnostic tests must have a high degree of consistency in their measurements (high reliability) to ensure accurate assessment of perceptual abilities. The current study assessed test–retest reliability and practice effects in the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test (L-POST) in 144 healthy volunteers, with time intervals between 0 and 756 days. We used Pearson's and intraclass correlation analysis, Bland–Altman analysis and multilevel modelling. Results from our analyses converged and supported an adequate reliability of the L-POST. Multilevel modelling demonstrated an absence of practice effect, suggesting that the L-POST is suitable for repeat administration. This study suggests that the L-POST has adequate reliability and is suitable for repeat administration even at short intervals. This study provides the basis for a more systematic evaluation for neuropsychological assessments, which can lead to the development of more reliable assessment batteries. Visual assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 test-retest reliability (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bland-Altman analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Practice effect (dpeaa)DE-He213 Intraclass correlation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Vancleef, Kathleen (orcid)0000-0002-9943-9341 aut Enthalten in Behavior research methods, instruments & computers Austin, Tex. : Psychonomic Society Publ., 1984 54(2022), 5 vom: 11. Jan., Seite 2457-2462 (DE-627)32998067X (DE-600)2048669-8 1532-5970 nnns volume:54 year:2022 number:5 day:11 month:01 pages:2457-2462 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2014 AR 54 2022 5 11 01 2457-2462
allfieldsGer	10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z doi (DE-627)SPR048391123 (SPR)s13428-021-01741-z-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Ding, Xiaotong verfasserin aut Test–retest reliability and practice effect of the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Visual diagnostic tests must have a high degree of consistency in their measurements (high reliability) to ensure accurate assessment of perceptual abilities. The current study assessed test–retest reliability and practice effects in the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test (L-POST) in 144 healthy volunteers, with time intervals between 0 and 756 days. We used Pearson's and intraclass correlation analysis, Bland–Altman analysis and multilevel modelling. Results from our analyses converged and supported an adequate reliability of the L-POST. Multilevel modelling demonstrated an absence of practice effect, suggesting that the L-POST is suitable for repeat administration. This study suggests that the L-POST has adequate reliability and is suitable for repeat administration even at short intervals. This study provides the basis for a more systematic evaluation for neuropsychological assessments, which can lead to the development of more reliable assessment batteries. Visual assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 test-retest reliability (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bland-Altman analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Practice effect (dpeaa)DE-He213 Intraclass correlation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Vancleef, Kathleen (orcid)0000-0002-9943-9341 aut Enthalten in Behavior research methods, instruments & computers Austin, Tex. : Psychonomic Society Publ., 1984 54(2022), 5 vom: 11. Jan., Seite 2457-2462 (DE-627)32998067X (DE-600)2048669-8 1532-5970 nnns volume:54 year:2022 number:5 day:11 month:01 pages:2457-2462 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2014 AR 54 2022 5 11 01 2457-2462
allfieldsSound	10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z doi (DE-627)SPR048391123 (SPR)s13428-021-01741-z-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Ding, Xiaotong verfasserin aut Test–retest reliability and practice effect of the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Visual diagnostic tests must have a high degree of consistency in their measurements (high reliability) to ensure accurate assessment of perceptual abilities. The current study assessed test–retest reliability and practice effects in the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test (L-POST) in 144 healthy volunteers, with time intervals between 0 and 756 days. We used Pearson's and intraclass correlation analysis, Bland–Altman analysis and multilevel modelling. Results from our analyses converged and supported an adequate reliability of the L-POST. Multilevel modelling demonstrated an absence of practice effect, suggesting that the L-POST is suitable for repeat administration. This study suggests that the L-POST has adequate reliability and is suitable for repeat administration even at short intervals. This study provides the basis for a more systematic evaluation for neuropsychological assessments, which can lead to the development of more reliable assessment batteries. Visual assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 test-retest reliability (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bland-Altman analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Practice effect (dpeaa)DE-He213 Intraclass correlation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Vancleef, Kathleen (orcid)0000-0002-9943-9341 aut Enthalten in Behavior research methods, instruments & computers Austin, Tex. : Psychonomic Society Publ., 1984 54(2022), 5 vom: 11. Jan., Seite 2457-2462 (DE-627)32998067X (DE-600)2048669-8 1532-5970 nnns volume:54 year:2022 number:5 day:11 month:01 pages:2457-2462 https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2014 AR 54 2022 5 11 01 2457-2462
language	English
source	Enthalten in Behavior research methods, instruments & computers 54(2022), 5 vom: 11. Jan., Seite 2457-2462 volume:54 year:2022 number:5 day:11 month:01 pages:2457-2462
sourceStr	Enthalten in Behavior research methods, instruments & computers 54(2022), 5 vom: 11. Jan., Seite 2457-2462 volume:54 year:2022 number:5 day:11 month:01 pages:2457-2462
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Visual assessment test-retest reliability Bland-Altman analysis Practice effect Intraclass correlation
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Behavior research methods, instruments & computers
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Ding, Xiaotong @@aut@@ Vancleef, Kathleen @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2022-01-11T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	32998067X
id	SPR048391123
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR048391123</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230509114116.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221019s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR048391123</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s13428-021-01741-z-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ding, Xiaotong</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Test–retest reliability and practice effect of the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Visual diagnostic tests must have a high degree of consistency in their measurements (high reliability) to ensure accurate assessment of perceptual abilities. The current study assessed test–retest reliability and practice effects in the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test (L-POST) in 144 healthy volunteers, with time intervals between 0 and 756 days. We used Pearson's and intraclass correlation analysis, Bland–Altman analysis and multilevel modelling. Results from our analyses converged and supported an adequate reliability of the L-POST. Multilevel modelling demonstrated an absence of practice effect, suggesting that the L-POST is suitable for repeat administration. This study suggests that the L-POST has adequate reliability and is suitable for repeat administration even at short intervals. This study provides the basis for a more systematic evaluation for neuropsychological assessments, which can lead to the development of more reliable assessment batteries.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Visual assessment</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">test-retest reliability</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bland-Altman analysis</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Practice effect</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intraclass correlation</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vancleef, Kathleen</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-9943-9341</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Behavior research methods, instruments & computers</subfield><subfield code="d">Austin, Tex. : Psychonomic Society Publ., 1984</subfield><subfield code="g">54(2022), 5 vom: 11. Jan., Seite 2457-2462</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)32998067X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2048669-8</subfield><subfield code="x">1532-5970</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:54</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">day:11</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:2457-2462</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">54</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="b">11</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield><subfield code="h">2457-2462</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Ding, Xiaotong
spellingShingle	Ding, Xiaotong misc Visual assessment misc test-retest reliability misc Bland-Altman analysis misc Practice effect misc Intraclass correlation Test–retest reliability and practice effect of the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test
authorStr	Ding, Xiaotong
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)32998067X
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut
collection	springer
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	1532-5970
topic_title	Test–retest reliability and practice effect of the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test Visual assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 test-retest reliability (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bland-Altman analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Practice effect (dpeaa)DE-He213 Intraclass correlation (dpeaa)DE-He213
topic	misc Visual assessment misc test-retest reliability misc Bland-Altman analysis misc Practice effect misc Intraclass correlation
topic_unstemmed	misc Visual assessment misc test-retest reliability misc Bland-Altman analysis misc Practice effect misc Intraclass correlation
topic_browse	misc Visual assessment misc test-retest reliability misc Bland-Altman analysis misc Practice effect misc Intraclass correlation
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Behavior research methods, instruments & computers
hierarchy_parent_id	32998067X
hierarchy_top_title	Behavior research methods, instruments & computers
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)32998067X (DE-600)2048669-8
title	Test–retest reliability and practice effect of the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test
ctrlnum	(DE-627)SPR048391123 (SPR)s13428-021-01741-z-e
title_full	Test–retest reliability and practice effect of the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test
author_sort	Ding, Xiaotong
journal	Behavior research methods, instruments & computers
journalStr	Behavior research methods, instruments & computers
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2022
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	2457
author_browse	Ding, Xiaotong Vancleef, Kathleen
container_volume	54
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Ding, Xiaotong
doi_str_mv	10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z
normlink	(ORCID)0000-0002-9943-9341
normlink_prefix_str_mv	(orcid)0000-0002-9943-9341
title_sort	test–retest reliability and practice effect of the leuven perceptual organisation screening test
title_auth	Test–retest reliability and practice effect of the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test
abstract	Abstract Visual diagnostic tests must have a high degree of consistency in their measurements (high reliability) to ensure accurate assessment of perceptual abilities. The current study assessed test–retest reliability and practice effects in the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test (L-POST) in 144 healthy volunteers, with time intervals between 0 and 756 days. We used Pearson's and intraclass correlation analysis, Bland–Altman analysis and multilevel modelling. Results from our analyses converged and supported an adequate reliability of the L-POST. Multilevel modelling demonstrated an absence of practice effect, suggesting that the L-POST is suitable for repeat administration. This study suggests that the L-POST has adequate reliability and is suitable for repeat administration even at short intervals. This study provides the basis for a more systematic evaluation for neuropsychological assessments, which can lead to the development of more reliable assessment batteries. © The Author(s) 2021
abstractGer	Abstract Visual diagnostic tests must have a high degree of consistency in their measurements (high reliability) to ensure accurate assessment of perceptual abilities. The current study assessed test–retest reliability and practice effects in the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test (L-POST) in 144 healthy volunteers, with time intervals between 0 and 756 days. We used Pearson's and intraclass correlation analysis, Bland–Altman analysis and multilevel modelling. Results from our analyses converged and supported an adequate reliability of the L-POST. Multilevel modelling demonstrated an absence of practice effect, suggesting that the L-POST is suitable for repeat administration. This study suggests that the L-POST has adequate reliability and is suitable for repeat administration even at short intervals. This study provides the basis for a more systematic evaluation for neuropsychological assessments, which can lead to the development of more reliable assessment batteries. © The Author(s) 2021
abstract_unstemmed	Abstract Visual diagnostic tests must have a high degree of consistency in their measurements (high reliability) to ensure accurate assessment of perceptual abilities. The current study assessed test–retest reliability and practice effects in the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test (L-POST) in 144 healthy volunteers, with time intervals between 0 and 756 days. We used Pearson's and intraclass correlation analysis, Bland–Altman analysis and multilevel modelling. Results from our analyses converged and supported an adequate reliability of the L-POST. Multilevel modelling demonstrated an absence of practice effect, suggesting that the L-POST is suitable for repeat administration. This study suggests that the L-POST has adequate reliability and is suitable for repeat administration even at short intervals. This study provides the basis for a more systematic evaluation for neuropsychological assessments, which can lead to the development of more reliable assessment batteries. © The Author(s) 2021
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2014
container_issue	5
title_short	Test–retest reliability and practice effect of the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test
url	https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z
remote_bool	true
author2	Vancleef, Kathleen
author2Str	Vancleef, Kathleen
ppnlink	32998067X
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z
up_date	2024-07-03T18:54:23.463Z
_version_	1803585179839627264
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR048391123</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230509114116.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221019s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR048391123</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s13428-021-01741-z-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ding, Xiaotong</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Test–retest reliability and practice effect of the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Visual diagnostic tests must have a high degree of consistency in their measurements (high reliability) to ensure accurate assessment of perceptual abilities. The current study assessed test–retest reliability and practice effects in the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test (L-POST) in 144 healthy volunteers, with time intervals between 0 and 756 days. We used Pearson's and intraclass correlation analysis, Bland–Altman analysis and multilevel modelling. Results from our analyses converged and supported an adequate reliability of the L-POST. Multilevel modelling demonstrated an absence of practice effect, suggesting that the L-POST is suitable for repeat administration. This study suggests that the L-POST has adequate reliability and is suitable for repeat administration even at short intervals. This study provides the basis for a more systematic evaluation for neuropsychological assessments, which can lead to the development of more reliable assessment batteries.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Visual assessment</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">test-retest reliability</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bland-Altman analysis</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Practice effect</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intraclass correlation</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vancleef, Kathleen</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-9943-9341</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Behavior research methods, instruments & computers</subfield><subfield code="d">Austin, Tex. : Psychonomic Society Publ., 1984</subfield><subfield code="g">54(2022), 5 vom: 11. Jan., Seite 2457-2462</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)32998067X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2048669-8</subfield><subfield code="x">1532-5970</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:54</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">day:11</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:2457-2462</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01741-z</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">54</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="b">11</subfield><subfield code="c">01</subfield><subfield code="h">2457-2462</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.3975353

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Test–retest reliability and practice effect of the Leuven Perceptual Organisation Screening Test

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?