Phenological Modification in Dogridge (Vitis × champini) Through Pruning for Hybridization
Abstract Vitis × champini cv. Dogridge is the only commercially popular rootstock held by the Indian grape industry, owing to its several advantages with respect to moisture stress tolerance, exclusion of chloride and improving scion vigour. However, over-dependence on a single rootstock might pose...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Vincent, Linta [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2022 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Anmerkung: |
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2022 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Erwerbs-Obstbau - Berlin : Springer, 2004, 64(2022), Suppl 1 vom: 14. Juni, Seite 79-86 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:64 ; year:2022 ; number:Suppl 1 ; day:14 ; month:06 ; pages:79-86 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s10341-022-00701-x |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
SPR048419494 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | SPR048419494 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230509114336.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 221026s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10341-022-00701-x |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)SPR048419494 | ||
035 | |a (SPR)s10341-022-00701-x-e | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Vincent, Linta |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Phenological Modification in Dogridge (Vitis × champini) Through Pruning for Hybridization |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2022 | ||
520 | |a Abstract Vitis × champini cv. Dogridge is the only commercially popular rootstock held by the Indian grape industry, owing to its several advantages with respect to moisture stress tolerance, exclusion of chloride and improving scion vigour. However, over-dependence on a single rootstock might pose a serious threat to the grape industry; thus, broadening the genetic base of Dogridge is inevitable to address introgression of candidate genes that can adapt to diverse adverse situations, especially with respect to tolerance to sodicity, which is lacking in Dogridge. Flowering in Dogridge is challenging and induction of the reproductive phase from the vegetative phase in Dogridge needs to be attempted. Pruning was found to be successful, and this study focussed on pruning timings and severity. The investigation was conducted at ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bengaluru. Pruning timings from September Ι fortnight to January ΙΙ fortnight along with pruning severity of five to eight bud levels were conducted. Observations related to flower set percentage and fruit set percentage were recorded, and key growth stages were depicted. These parameters were associated with maximum and minimum temperature. Pruning timings of January Ι and December ΙΙ fortnight produced the highest flowering, followed by October Ι and September ΙΙ fortnight pruning, while the highest percentage of fruit set was accounted for in October Ι and September ΙΙ fortnight pruning. Similarly, per cent flowering and per cent fruit set was also affected by pruning severity and was highest in 5th and 6th bud level pruning. Lower minimum temperature of 11–13 °C and higher diurnal temperature variation favoured the highest per cent flowering in December ΙΙ and January Ι fortnight pruning, while higher maximum temperature during fruit development hampered fruitfulness. However, the temperature prevailed during the reproductive stage of Dogridge when pruned in September ΙΙ and October Ι fortnight resulted in higher numbers of flowers and fruit set. This information may boost rootstock breeding in Dogridge to improve its drought and salinity. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Dogridge |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Pruning severity |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Pruning timings |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Flower induction |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Temperature |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
700 | 1 | |a Satisha, J. |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Erwerbs-Obstbau |d Berlin : Springer, 2004 |g 64(2022), Suppl 1 vom: 14. Juni, Seite 79-86 |w (DE-627)382928237 |w (DE-600)2140078-7 |x 1439-0302 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:64 |g year:2022 |g number:Suppl 1 |g day:14 |g month:06 |g pages:79-86 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10341-022-00701-x |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_120 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_138 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_150 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_152 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_171 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_187 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_250 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_267 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_281 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_636 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2001 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2007 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2010 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2021 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2026 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2027 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2031 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2038 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2039 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2049 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2050 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2056 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2057 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2059 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2061 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2064 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2065 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2068 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2088 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2093 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2106 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2107 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2108 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2113 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2118 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2129 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2143 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2144 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2147 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2148 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2152 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2153 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2188 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2190 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2232 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2336 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2470 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2472 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2507 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2522 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2548 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4242 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4246 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4251 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4328 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4333 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4334 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4336 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4393 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 64 |j 2022 |e Suppl 1 |b 14 |c 06 |h 79-86 |
author_variant |
l v lv j s js |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:14390302:2022----::hnlgcloiiainnordeiicapntruhr |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
publishDate |
2022 |
allfields |
10.1007/s10341-022-00701-x doi (DE-627)SPR048419494 (SPR)s10341-022-00701-x-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Vincent, Linta verfasserin aut Phenological Modification in Dogridge (Vitis × champini) Through Pruning for Hybridization 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2022 Abstract Vitis × champini cv. Dogridge is the only commercially popular rootstock held by the Indian grape industry, owing to its several advantages with respect to moisture stress tolerance, exclusion of chloride and improving scion vigour. However, over-dependence on a single rootstock might pose a serious threat to the grape industry; thus, broadening the genetic base of Dogridge is inevitable to address introgression of candidate genes that can adapt to diverse adverse situations, especially with respect to tolerance to sodicity, which is lacking in Dogridge. Flowering in Dogridge is challenging and induction of the reproductive phase from the vegetative phase in Dogridge needs to be attempted. Pruning was found to be successful, and this study focussed on pruning timings and severity. The investigation was conducted at ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bengaluru. Pruning timings from September Ι fortnight to January ΙΙ fortnight along with pruning severity of five to eight bud levels were conducted. Observations related to flower set percentage and fruit set percentage were recorded, and key growth stages were depicted. These parameters were associated with maximum and minimum temperature. Pruning timings of January Ι and December ΙΙ fortnight produced the highest flowering, followed by October Ι and September ΙΙ fortnight pruning, while the highest percentage of fruit set was accounted for in October Ι and September ΙΙ fortnight pruning. Similarly, per cent flowering and per cent fruit set was also affected by pruning severity and was highest in 5th and 6th bud level pruning. Lower minimum temperature of 11–13 °C and higher diurnal temperature variation favoured the highest per cent flowering in December ΙΙ and January Ι fortnight pruning, while higher maximum temperature during fruit development hampered fruitfulness. However, the temperature prevailed during the reproductive stage of Dogridge when pruned in September ΙΙ and October Ι fortnight resulted in higher numbers of flowers and fruit set. This information may boost rootstock breeding in Dogridge to improve its drought and salinity. Dogridge (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pruning severity (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pruning timings (dpeaa)DE-He213 Flower induction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Temperature (dpeaa)DE-He213 Satisha, J. aut Enthalten in Erwerbs-Obstbau Berlin : Springer, 2004 64(2022), Suppl 1 vom: 14. Juni, Seite 79-86 (DE-627)382928237 (DE-600)2140078-7 1439-0302 nnns volume:64 year:2022 number:Suppl 1 day:14 month:06 pages:79-86 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10341-022-00701-x lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 64 2022 Suppl 1 14 06 79-86 |
spelling |
10.1007/s10341-022-00701-x doi (DE-627)SPR048419494 (SPR)s10341-022-00701-x-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Vincent, Linta verfasserin aut Phenological Modification in Dogridge (Vitis × champini) Through Pruning for Hybridization 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2022 Abstract Vitis × champini cv. Dogridge is the only commercially popular rootstock held by the Indian grape industry, owing to its several advantages with respect to moisture stress tolerance, exclusion of chloride and improving scion vigour. However, over-dependence on a single rootstock might pose a serious threat to the grape industry; thus, broadening the genetic base of Dogridge is inevitable to address introgression of candidate genes that can adapt to diverse adverse situations, especially with respect to tolerance to sodicity, which is lacking in Dogridge. Flowering in Dogridge is challenging and induction of the reproductive phase from the vegetative phase in Dogridge needs to be attempted. Pruning was found to be successful, and this study focussed on pruning timings and severity. The investigation was conducted at ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bengaluru. Pruning timings from September Ι fortnight to January ΙΙ fortnight along with pruning severity of five to eight bud levels were conducted. Observations related to flower set percentage and fruit set percentage were recorded, and key growth stages were depicted. These parameters were associated with maximum and minimum temperature. Pruning timings of January Ι and December ΙΙ fortnight produced the highest flowering, followed by October Ι and September ΙΙ fortnight pruning, while the highest percentage of fruit set was accounted for in October Ι and September ΙΙ fortnight pruning. Similarly, per cent flowering and per cent fruit set was also affected by pruning severity and was highest in 5th and 6th bud level pruning. Lower minimum temperature of 11–13 °C and higher diurnal temperature variation favoured the highest per cent flowering in December ΙΙ and January Ι fortnight pruning, while higher maximum temperature during fruit development hampered fruitfulness. However, the temperature prevailed during the reproductive stage of Dogridge when pruned in September ΙΙ and October Ι fortnight resulted in higher numbers of flowers and fruit set. This information may boost rootstock breeding in Dogridge to improve its drought and salinity. Dogridge (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pruning severity (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pruning timings (dpeaa)DE-He213 Flower induction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Temperature (dpeaa)DE-He213 Satisha, J. aut Enthalten in Erwerbs-Obstbau Berlin : Springer, 2004 64(2022), Suppl 1 vom: 14. Juni, Seite 79-86 (DE-627)382928237 (DE-600)2140078-7 1439-0302 nnns volume:64 year:2022 number:Suppl 1 day:14 month:06 pages:79-86 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10341-022-00701-x lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 64 2022 Suppl 1 14 06 79-86 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s10341-022-00701-x doi (DE-627)SPR048419494 (SPR)s10341-022-00701-x-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Vincent, Linta verfasserin aut Phenological Modification in Dogridge (Vitis × champini) Through Pruning for Hybridization 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2022 Abstract Vitis × champini cv. Dogridge is the only commercially popular rootstock held by the Indian grape industry, owing to its several advantages with respect to moisture stress tolerance, exclusion of chloride and improving scion vigour. However, over-dependence on a single rootstock might pose a serious threat to the grape industry; thus, broadening the genetic base of Dogridge is inevitable to address introgression of candidate genes that can adapt to diverse adverse situations, especially with respect to tolerance to sodicity, which is lacking in Dogridge. Flowering in Dogridge is challenging and induction of the reproductive phase from the vegetative phase in Dogridge needs to be attempted. Pruning was found to be successful, and this study focussed on pruning timings and severity. The investigation was conducted at ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bengaluru. Pruning timings from September Ι fortnight to January ΙΙ fortnight along with pruning severity of five to eight bud levels were conducted. Observations related to flower set percentage and fruit set percentage were recorded, and key growth stages were depicted. These parameters were associated with maximum and minimum temperature. Pruning timings of January Ι and December ΙΙ fortnight produced the highest flowering, followed by October Ι and September ΙΙ fortnight pruning, while the highest percentage of fruit set was accounted for in October Ι and September ΙΙ fortnight pruning. Similarly, per cent flowering and per cent fruit set was also affected by pruning severity and was highest in 5th and 6th bud level pruning. Lower minimum temperature of 11–13 °C and higher diurnal temperature variation favoured the highest per cent flowering in December ΙΙ and January Ι fortnight pruning, while higher maximum temperature during fruit development hampered fruitfulness. However, the temperature prevailed during the reproductive stage of Dogridge when pruned in September ΙΙ and October Ι fortnight resulted in higher numbers of flowers and fruit set. This information may boost rootstock breeding in Dogridge to improve its drought and salinity. Dogridge (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pruning severity (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pruning timings (dpeaa)DE-He213 Flower induction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Temperature (dpeaa)DE-He213 Satisha, J. aut Enthalten in Erwerbs-Obstbau Berlin : Springer, 2004 64(2022), Suppl 1 vom: 14. Juni, Seite 79-86 (DE-627)382928237 (DE-600)2140078-7 1439-0302 nnns volume:64 year:2022 number:Suppl 1 day:14 month:06 pages:79-86 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10341-022-00701-x lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 64 2022 Suppl 1 14 06 79-86 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s10341-022-00701-x doi (DE-627)SPR048419494 (SPR)s10341-022-00701-x-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Vincent, Linta verfasserin aut Phenological Modification in Dogridge (Vitis × champini) Through Pruning for Hybridization 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2022 Abstract Vitis × champini cv. Dogridge is the only commercially popular rootstock held by the Indian grape industry, owing to its several advantages with respect to moisture stress tolerance, exclusion of chloride and improving scion vigour. However, over-dependence on a single rootstock might pose a serious threat to the grape industry; thus, broadening the genetic base of Dogridge is inevitable to address introgression of candidate genes that can adapt to diverse adverse situations, especially with respect to tolerance to sodicity, which is lacking in Dogridge. Flowering in Dogridge is challenging and induction of the reproductive phase from the vegetative phase in Dogridge needs to be attempted. Pruning was found to be successful, and this study focussed on pruning timings and severity. The investigation was conducted at ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bengaluru. Pruning timings from September Ι fortnight to January ΙΙ fortnight along with pruning severity of five to eight bud levels were conducted. Observations related to flower set percentage and fruit set percentage were recorded, and key growth stages were depicted. These parameters were associated with maximum and minimum temperature. Pruning timings of January Ι and December ΙΙ fortnight produced the highest flowering, followed by October Ι and September ΙΙ fortnight pruning, while the highest percentage of fruit set was accounted for in October Ι and September ΙΙ fortnight pruning. Similarly, per cent flowering and per cent fruit set was also affected by pruning severity and was highest in 5th and 6th bud level pruning. Lower minimum temperature of 11–13 °C and higher diurnal temperature variation favoured the highest per cent flowering in December ΙΙ and January Ι fortnight pruning, while higher maximum temperature during fruit development hampered fruitfulness. However, the temperature prevailed during the reproductive stage of Dogridge when pruned in September ΙΙ and October Ι fortnight resulted in higher numbers of flowers and fruit set. This information may boost rootstock breeding in Dogridge to improve its drought and salinity. Dogridge (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pruning severity (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pruning timings (dpeaa)DE-He213 Flower induction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Temperature (dpeaa)DE-He213 Satisha, J. aut Enthalten in Erwerbs-Obstbau Berlin : Springer, 2004 64(2022), Suppl 1 vom: 14. Juni, Seite 79-86 (DE-627)382928237 (DE-600)2140078-7 1439-0302 nnns volume:64 year:2022 number:Suppl 1 day:14 month:06 pages:79-86 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10341-022-00701-x lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 64 2022 Suppl 1 14 06 79-86 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s10341-022-00701-x doi (DE-627)SPR048419494 (SPR)s10341-022-00701-x-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Vincent, Linta verfasserin aut Phenological Modification in Dogridge (Vitis × champini) Through Pruning for Hybridization 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2022 Abstract Vitis × champini cv. Dogridge is the only commercially popular rootstock held by the Indian grape industry, owing to its several advantages with respect to moisture stress tolerance, exclusion of chloride and improving scion vigour. However, over-dependence on a single rootstock might pose a serious threat to the grape industry; thus, broadening the genetic base of Dogridge is inevitable to address introgression of candidate genes that can adapt to diverse adverse situations, especially with respect to tolerance to sodicity, which is lacking in Dogridge. Flowering in Dogridge is challenging and induction of the reproductive phase from the vegetative phase in Dogridge needs to be attempted. Pruning was found to be successful, and this study focussed on pruning timings and severity. The investigation was conducted at ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bengaluru. Pruning timings from September Ι fortnight to January ΙΙ fortnight along with pruning severity of five to eight bud levels were conducted. Observations related to flower set percentage and fruit set percentage were recorded, and key growth stages were depicted. These parameters were associated with maximum and minimum temperature. Pruning timings of January Ι and December ΙΙ fortnight produced the highest flowering, followed by October Ι and September ΙΙ fortnight pruning, while the highest percentage of fruit set was accounted for in October Ι and September ΙΙ fortnight pruning. Similarly, per cent flowering and per cent fruit set was also affected by pruning severity and was highest in 5th and 6th bud level pruning. Lower minimum temperature of 11–13 °C and higher diurnal temperature variation favoured the highest per cent flowering in December ΙΙ and January Ι fortnight pruning, while higher maximum temperature during fruit development hampered fruitfulness. However, the temperature prevailed during the reproductive stage of Dogridge when pruned in September ΙΙ and October Ι fortnight resulted in higher numbers of flowers and fruit set. This information may boost rootstock breeding in Dogridge to improve its drought and salinity. Dogridge (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pruning severity (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pruning timings (dpeaa)DE-He213 Flower induction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Temperature (dpeaa)DE-He213 Satisha, J. aut Enthalten in Erwerbs-Obstbau Berlin : Springer, 2004 64(2022), Suppl 1 vom: 14. Juni, Seite 79-86 (DE-627)382928237 (DE-600)2140078-7 1439-0302 nnns volume:64 year:2022 number:Suppl 1 day:14 month:06 pages:79-86 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10341-022-00701-x lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 64 2022 Suppl 1 14 06 79-86 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Erwerbs-Obstbau 64(2022), Suppl 1 vom: 14. Juni, Seite 79-86 volume:64 year:2022 number:Suppl 1 day:14 month:06 pages:79-86 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Erwerbs-Obstbau 64(2022), Suppl 1 vom: 14. Juni, Seite 79-86 volume:64 year:2022 number:Suppl 1 day:14 month:06 pages:79-86 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Dogridge Pruning severity Pruning timings Flower induction Temperature |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Erwerbs-Obstbau |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Vincent, Linta @@aut@@ Satisha, J. @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-06-14T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
382928237 |
id |
SPR048419494 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR048419494</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230509114336.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221026s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10341-022-00701-x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR048419494</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s10341-022-00701-x-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vincent, Linta</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Phenological Modification in Dogridge (Vitis × champini) Through Pruning for Hybridization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Vitis × champini cv. Dogridge is the only commercially popular rootstock held by the Indian grape industry, owing to its several advantages with respect to moisture stress tolerance, exclusion of chloride and improving scion vigour. However, over-dependence on a single rootstock might pose a serious threat to the grape industry; thus, broadening the genetic base of Dogridge is inevitable to address introgression of candidate genes that can adapt to diverse adverse situations, especially with respect to tolerance to sodicity, which is lacking in Dogridge. Flowering in Dogridge is challenging and induction of the reproductive phase from the vegetative phase in Dogridge needs to be attempted. Pruning was found to be successful, and this study focussed on pruning timings and severity. The investigation was conducted at ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bengaluru. Pruning timings from September Ι fortnight to January ΙΙ fortnight along with pruning severity of five to eight bud levels were conducted. Observations related to flower set percentage and fruit set percentage were recorded, and key growth stages were depicted. These parameters were associated with maximum and minimum temperature. Pruning timings of January Ι and December ΙΙ fortnight produced the highest flowering, followed by October Ι and September ΙΙ fortnight pruning, while the highest percentage of fruit set was accounted for in October Ι and September ΙΙ fortnight pruning. Similarly, per cent flowering and per cent fruit set was also affected by pruning severity and was highest in 5th and 6th bud level pruning. Lower minimum temperature of 11–13 °C and higher diurnal temperature variation favoured the highest per cent flowering in December ΙΙ and January Ι fortnight pruning, while higher maximum temperature during fruit development hampered fruitfulness. However, the temperature prevailed during the reproductive stage of Dogridge when pruned in September ΙΙ and October Ι fortnight resulted in higher numbers of flowers and fruit set. This information may boost rootstock breeding in Dogridge to improve its drought and salinity.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Dogridge</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pruning severity</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pruning timings</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Flower induction</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Temperature</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Satisha, J.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Erwerbs-Obstbau</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : Springer, 2004</subfield><subfield code="g">64(2022), Suppl 1 vom: 14. Juni, Seite 79-86</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)382928237</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2140078-7</subfield><subfield code="x">1439-0302</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:64</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:Suppl 1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:14</subfield><subfield code="g">month:06</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:79-86</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10341-022-00701-x</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">64</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">Suppl 1</subfield><subfield code="b">14</subfield><subfield code="c">06</subfield><subfield code="h">79-86</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Vincent, Linta |
spellingShingle |
Vincent, Linta misc Dogridge misc Pruning severity misc Pruning timings misc Flower induction misc Temperature Phenological Modification in Dogridge (Vitis × champini) Through Pruning for Hybridization |
authorStr |
Vincent, Linta |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)382928237 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut |
collection |
springer |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1439-0302 |
topic_title |
Phenological Modification in Dogridge (Vitis × champini) Through Pruning for Hybridization Dogridge (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pruning severity (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pruning timings (dpeaa)DE-He213 Flower induction (dpeaa)DE-He213 Temperature (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
topic |
misc Dogridge misc Pruning severity misc Pruning timings misc Flower induction misc Temperature |
topic_unstemmed |
misc Dogridge misc Pruning severity misc Pruning timings misc Flower induction misc Temperature |
topic_browse |
misc Dogridge misc Pruning severity misc Pruning timings misc Flower induction misc Temperature |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Erwerbs-Obstbau |
hierarchy_parent_id |
382928237 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Erwerbs-Obstbau |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)382928237 (DE-600)2140078-7 |
title |
Phenological Modification in Dogridge (Vitis × champini) Through Pruning for Hybridization |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR048419494 (SPR)s10341-022-00701-x-e |
title_full |
Phenological Modification in Dogridge (Vitis × champini) Through Pruning for Hybridization |
author_sort |
Vincent, Linta |
journal |
Erwerbs-Obstbau |
journalStr |
Erwerbs-Obstbau |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2022 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
79 |
author_browse |
Vincent, Linta Satisha, J. |
container_volume |
64 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Vincent, Linta |
doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s10341-022-00701-x |
title_sort |
phenological modification in dogridge (vitis × champini) through pruning for hybridization |
title_auth |
Phenological Modification in Dogridge (Vitis × champini) Through Pruning for Hybridization |
abstract |
Abstract Vitis × champini cv. Dogridge is the only commercially popular rootstock held by the Indian grape industry, owing to its several advantages with respect to moisture stress tolerance, exclusion of chloride and improving scion vigour. However, over-dependence on a single rootstock might pose a serious threat to the grape industry; thus, broadening the genetic base of Dogridge is inevitable to address introgression of candidate genes that can adapt to diverse adverse situations, especially with respect to tolerance to sodicity, which is lacking in Dogridge. Flowering in Dogridge is challenging and induction of the reproductive phase from the vegetative phase in Dogridge needs to be attempted. Pruning was found to be successful, and this study focussed on pruning timings and severity. The investigation was conducted at ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bengaluru. Pruning timings from September Ι fortnight to January ΙΙ fortnight along with pruning severity of five to eight bud levels were conducted. Observations related to flower set percentage and fruit set percentage were recorded, and key growth stages were depicted. These parameters were associated with maximum and minimum temperature. Pruning timings of January Ι and December ΙΙ fortnight produced the highest flowering, followed by October Ι and September ΙΙ fortnight pruning, while the highest percentage of fruit set was accounted for in October Ι and September ΙΙ fortnight pruning. Similarly, per cent flowering and per cent fruit set was also affected by pruning severity and was highest in 5th and 6th bud level pruning. Lower minimum temperature of 11–13 °C and higher diurnal temperature variation favoured the highest per cent flowering in December ΙΙ and January Ι fortnight pruning, while higher maximum temperature during fruit development hampered fruitfulness. However, the temperature prevailed during the reproductive stage of Dogridge when pruned in September ΙΙ and October Ι fortnight resulted in higher numbers of flowers and fruit set. This information may boost rootstock breeding in Dogridge to improve its drought and salinity. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2022 |
abstractGer |
Abstract Vitis × champini cv. Dogridge is the only commercially popular rootstock held by the Indian grape industry, owing to its several advantages with respect to moisture stress tolerance, exclusion of chloride and improving scion vigour. However, over-dependence on a single rootstock might pose a serious threat to the grape industry; thus, broadening the genetic base of Dogridge is inevitable to address introgression of candidate genes that can adapt to diverse adverse situations, especially with respect to tolerance to sodicity, which is lacking in Dogridge. Flowering in Dogridge is challenging and induction of the reproductive phase from the vegetative phase in Dogridge needs to be attempted. Pruning was found to be successful, and this study focussed on pruning timings and severity. The investigation was conducted at ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bengaluru. Pruning timings from September Ι fortnight to January ΙΙ fortnight along with pruning severity of five to eight bud levels were conducted. Observations related to flower set percentage and fruit set percentage were recorded, and key growth stages were depicted. These parameters were associated with maximum and minimum temperature. Pruning timings of January Ι and December ΙΙ fortnight produced the highest flowering, followed by October Ι and September ΙΙ fortnight pruning, while the highest percentage of fruit set was accounted for in October Ι and September ΙΙ fortnight pruning. Similarly, per cent flowering and per cent fruit set was also affected by pruning severity and was highest in 5th and 6th bud level pruning. Lower minimum temperature of 11–13 °C and higher diurnal temperature variation favoured the highest per cent flowering in December ΙΙ and January Ι fortnight pruning, while higher maximum temperature during fruit development hampered fruitfulness. However, the temperature prevailed during the reproductive stage of Dogridge when pruned in September ΙΙ and October Ι fortnight resulted in higher numbers of flowers and fruit set. This information may boost rootstock breeding in Dogridge to improve its drought and salinity. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2022 |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Vitis × champini cv. Dogridge is the only commercially popular rootstock held by the Indian grape industry, owing to its several advantages with respect to moisture stress tolerance, exclusion of chloride and improving scion vigour. However, over-dependence on a single rootstock might pose a serious threat to the grape industry; thus, broadening the genetic base of Dogridge is inevitable to address introgression of candidate genes that can adapt to diverse adverse situations, especially with respect to tolerance to sodicity, which is lacking in Dogridge. Flowering in Dogridge is challenging and induction of the reproductive phase from the vegetative phase in Dogridge needs to be attempted. Pruning was found to be successful, and this study focussed on pruning timings and severity. The investigation was conducted at ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bengaluru. Pruning timings from September Ι fortnight to January ΙΙ fortnight along with pruning severity of five to eight bud levels were conducted. Observations related to flower set percentage and fruit set percentage were recorded, and key growth stages were depicted. These parameters were associated with maximum and minimum temperature. Pruning timings of January Ι and December ΙΙ fortnight produced the highest flowering, followed by October Ι and September ΙΙ fortnight pruning, while the highest percentage of fruit set was accounted for in October Ι and September ΙΙ fortnight pruning. Similarly, per cent flowering and per cent fruit set was also affected by pruning severity and was highest in 5th and 6th bud level pruning. Lower minimum temperature of 11–13 °C and higher diurnal temperature variation favoured the highest per cent flowering in December ΙΙ and January Ι fortnight pruning, while higher maximum temperature during fruit development hampered fruitfulness. However, the temperature prevailed during the reproductive stage of Dogridge when pruned in September ΙΙ and October Ι fortnight resulted in higher numbers of flowers and fruit set. This information may boost rootstock breeding in Dogridge to improve its drought and salinity. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2022 |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
Suppl 1 |
title_short |
Phenological Modification in Dogridge (Vitis × champini) Through Pruning for Hybridization |
url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10341-022-00701-x |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Satisha, J. |
author2Str |
Satisha, J. |
ppnlink |
382928237 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1007/s10341-022-00701-x |
up_date |
2024-07-03T19:05:54.087Z |
_version_ |
1803585904014524416 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR048419494</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230509114336.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221026s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10341-022-00701-x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR048419494</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s10341-022-00701-x-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vincent, Linta</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Phenological Modification in Dogridge (Vitis × champini) Through Pruning for Hybridization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Vitis × champini cv. Dogridge is the only commercially popular rootstock held by the Indian grape industry, owing to its several advantages with respect to moisture stress tolerance, exclusion of chloride and improving scion vigour. However, over-dependence on a single rootstock might pose a serious threat to the grape industry; thus, broadening the genetic base of Dogridge is inevitable to address introgression of candidate genes that can adapt to diverse adverse situations, especially with respect to tolerance to sodicity, which is lacking in Dogridge. Flowering in Dogridge is challenging and induction of the reproductive phase from the vegetative phase in Dogridge needs to be attempted. Pruning was found to be successful, and this study focussed on pruning timings and severity. The investigation was conducted at ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bengaluru. Pruning timings from September Ι fortnight to January ΙΙ fortnight along with pruning severity of five to eight bud levels were conducted. Observations related to flower set percentage and fruit set percentage were recorded, and key growth stages were depicted. These parameters were associated with maximum and minimum temperature. Pruning timings of January Ι and December ΙΙ fortnight produced the highest flowering, followed by October Ι and September ΙΙ fortnight pruning, while the highest percentage of fruit set was accounted for in October Ι and September ΙΙ fortnight pruning. Similarly, per cent flowering and per cent fruit set was also affected by pruning severity and was highest in 5th and 6th bud level pruning. Lower minimum temperature of 11–13 °C and higher diurnal temperature variation favoured the highest per cent flowering in December ΙΙ and January Ι fortnight pruning, while higher maximum temperature during fruit development hampered fruitfulness. However, the temperature prevailed during the reproductive stage of Dogridge when pruned in September ΙΙ and October Ι fortnight resulted in higher numbers of flowers and fruit set. This information may boost rootstock breeding in Dogridge to improve its drought and salinity.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Dogridge</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pruning severity</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pruning timings</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Flower induction</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Temperature</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Satisha, J.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Erwerbs-Obstbau</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : Springer, 2004</subfield><subfield code="g">64(2022), Suppl 1 vom: 14. Juni, Seite 79-86</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)382928237</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2140078-7</subfield><subfield code="x">1439-0302</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:64</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:Suppl 1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:14</subfield><subfield code="g">month:06</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:79-86</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10341-022-00701-x</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">64</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">Suppl 1</subfield><subfield code="b">14</subfield><subfield code="c">06</subfield><subfield code="h">79-86</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.401353 |