Influence of the self-adhering strategy on microhardness, sorption, solubility, color stability, and cytotoxicity compared to bulk-fill and conventional resin composites
Objectives To analyze and compare, in vitro, the microhardness, sorption, solubility, color stability, and cytotoxicity of three types of resin composites: self-adhesive (SARC) (Dyad Flow (DF)/Kerr), bulk-fill (Filtek Bulk Fill Flow (FBF)/3 M ESPE), and conventional (Filtek Z350XT Flow (Z350)/3 M ES...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
de Oliveira, Natália Gomes [verfasserIn] de Barros Albuquerque, Amanda Pinheiro de Melo Rêgo, Moacyr Jesus Barreto |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Clinical Oral Investigations - Springer-Verlag, 2001, 26(2022), 11 vom: 02. Aug., Seite 6663-6670 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:26 ; year:2022 ; number:11 ; day:02 ; month:08 ; pages:6663-6670 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s00784-022-04624-5 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR048569100 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR048569100 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230509115518.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221109s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00784-022-04624-5 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR048569100 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)s00784-022-04624-5-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a de Oliveira, Natália Gomes |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0001-6937-1537 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Influence of the self-adhering strategy on microhardness, sorption, solubility, color stability, and cytotoxicity compared to bulk-fill and conventional resin composites |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022 | ||
| 520 | |a Objectives To analyze and compare, in vitro, the microhardness, sorption, solubility, color stability, and cytotoxicity of three types of resin composites: self-adhesive (SARC) (Dyad Flow (DF)/Kerr), bulk-fill (Filtek Bulk Fill Flow (FBF)/3 M ESPE), and conventional (Filtek Z350XT Flow (Z350)/3 M ESPE). Materials and methods Thirty cylindrical specimens were prepared using a split metal mold (15 mm × 1 mm), divided into 3 groups (n = 10) according to the material used. Vickers hardness (VH) was calculated from three indentations (300gf/15 s) per specimen. The sorption and solubility were measured according to the ISO 4049:2009 specification after storing in distilled water for 7 days. The color of each resin composite was measured using a portable digital spectrophotometer according to the CIELAB system. After a 7-day immersion in coffee, the color variation (∆E) was calculated. Following the ISO 10993:2012, the cytotoxicity in Vero cells was evaluated through the MTT assay. The results were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test to compare the studied groups. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare the assessments in each studied group. For cytotoxicity analysis, the data were compared by the ANOVA test (α = 0.05). Results DF showed the lowest VH (28.67), highest sorption (0.543 µg/$ mm^{3} $) and solubility (1.700 µg/$ mm^{3} $), and higher ∆E after 7 days of coffee immersion (p = 0.008). The resin composites studied were considered non-cytotoxic. Conclusions The SARC presented inferior mechanical and physical–chemical properties than bulk-fill and conventional resin composites, with comparable cytotoxicity against Vero cells. Clinical relevance The simplification of the clinical protocol of SARC can minimize the number of possible failures during the restorative technique. However, considering their inferior physical and mechanical properties, their coverage with materials of higher mechanical properties and physical–chemical stability should be considered. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Resin composite |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Self-adhering resin composite |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Bulk-fill resin composite |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Hardness |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Sorption |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Solubility |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Cytotoxicity |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Espíndola-Castro, Luís Felipe |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rocha, Julliana Carvalho |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a de Barros Albuquerque, Amanda Pinheiro |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a de Melo Rêgo, Moacyr Jesus Barreto |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a de Melo Monteiro, Gabriela Queiroz |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a de Vasconcelos Carvalho, Marianne |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Clinical Oral Investigations |d Springer-Verlag, 2001 |g 26(2022), 11 vom: 02. Aug., Seite 6663-6670 |w (DE-627)SPR007794231 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:26 |g year:2022 |g number:11 |g day:02 |g month:08 |g pages:6663-6670 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04624-5 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 26 |j 2022 |e 11 |b 02 |c 08 |h 6663-6670 | ||
| author_variant |
o n g d ong ongd l f e c lfe lfec j c r jc jcr b a a p d baap baapd m r m j b d mrmjb mrmjbd m m g q d mmgq mmgqd v c m d vcm vcmd |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
deoliveiranatliagomesespndolacastrolusfe:2022----:nlecoteefdeigtaeynirhrnssrtoslbltclrtbltadyooiiyoprdou |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s00784-022-04624-5 doi (DE-627)SPR048569100 (SPR)s00784-022-04624-5-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng de Oliveira, Natália Gomes verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-6937-1537 aut Influence of the self-adhering strategy on microhardness, sorption, solubility, color stability, and cytotoxicity compared to bulk-fill and conventional resin composites 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022 Objectives To analyze and compare, in vitro, the microhardness, sorption, solubility, color stability, and cytotoxicity of three types of resin composites: self-adhesive (SARC) (Dyad Flow (DF)/Kerr), bulk-fill (Filtek Bulk Fill Flow (FBF)/3 M ESPE), and conventional (Filtek Z350XT Flow (Z350)/3 M ESPE). Materials and methods Thirty cylindrical specimens were prepared using a split metal mold (15 mm × 1 mm), divided into 3 groups (n = 10) according to the material used. Vickers hardness (VH) was calculated from three indentations (300gf/15 s) per specimen. The sorption and solubility were measured according to the ISO 4049:2009 specification after storing in distilled water for 7 days. The color of each resin composite was measured using a portable digital spectrophotometer according to the CIELAB system. After a 7-day immersion in coffee, the color variation (∆E) was calculated. Following the ISO 10993:2012, the cytotoxicity in Vero cells was evaluated through the MTT assay. The results were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test to compare the studied groups. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare the assessments in each studied group. For cytotoxicity analysis, the data were compared by the ANOVA test (α = 0.05). Results DF showed the lowest VH (28.67), highest sorption (0.543 µg/$ mm^{3} $) and solubility (1.700 µg/$ mm^{3} $), and higher ∆E after 7 days of coffee immersion (p = 0.008). The resin composites studied were considered non-cytotoxic. Conclusions The SARC presented inferior mechanical and physical–chemical properties than bulk-fill and conventional resin composites, with comparable cytotoxicity against Vero cells. Clinical relevance The simplification of the clinical protocol of SARC can minimize the number of possible failures during the restorative technique. However, considering their inferior physical and mechanical properties, their coverage with materials of higher mechanical properties and physical–chemical stability should be considered. Resin composite (dpeaa)DE-He213 Self-adhering resin composite (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bulk-fill resin composite (dpeaa)DE-He213 Hardness (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sorption (dpeaa)DE-He213 Solubility (dpeaa)DE-He213 Cytotoxicity (dpeaa)DE-He213 Espíndola-Castro, Luís Felipe aut Rocha, Julliana Carvalho aut de Barros Albuquerque, Amanda Pinheiro aut de Melo Rêgo, Moacyr Jesus Barreto aut de Melo Monteiro, Gabriela Queiroz aut de Vasconcelos Carvalho, Marianne aut Enthalten in Clinical Oral Investigations Springer-Verlag, 2001 26(2022), 11 vom: 02. Aug., Seite 6663-6670 (DE-627)SPR007794231 nnns volume:26 year:2022 number:11 day:02 month:08 pages:6663-6670 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04624-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 26 2022 11 02 08 6663-6670 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s00784-022-04624-5 doi (DE-627)SPR048569100 (SPR)s00784-022-04624-5-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng de Oliveira, Natália Gomes verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-6937-1537 aut Influence of the self-adhering strategy on microhardness, sorption, solubility, color stability, and cytotoxicity compared to bulk-fill and conventional resin composites 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022 Objectives To analyze and compare, in vitro, the microhardness, sorption, solubility, color stability, and cytotoxicity of three types of resin composites: self-adhesive (SARC) (Dyad Flow (DF)/Kerr), bulk-fill (Filtek Bulk Fill Flow (FBF)/3 M ESPE), and conventional (Filtek Z350XT Flow (Z350)/3 M ESPE). Materials and methods Thirty cylindrical specimens were prepared using a split metal mold (15 mm × 1 mm), divided into 3 groups (n = 10) according to the material used. Vickers hardness (VH) was calculated from three indentations (300gf/15 s) per specimen. The sorption and solubility were measured according to the ISO 4049:2009 specification after storing in distilled water for 7 days. The color of each resin composite was measured using a portable digital spectrophotometer according to the CIELAB system. After a 7-day immersion in coffee, the color variation (∆E) was calculated. Following the ISO 10993:2012, the cytotoxicity in Vero cells was evaluated through the MTT assay. The results were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test to compare the studied groups. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare the assessments in each studied group. For cytotoxicity analysis, the data were compared by the ANOVA test (α = 0.05). Results DF showed the lowest VH (28.67), highest sorption (0.543 µg/$ mm^{3} $) and solubility (1.700 µg/$ mm^{3} $), and higher ∆E after 7 days of coffee immersion (p = 0.008). The resin composites studied were considered non-cytotoxic. Conclusions The SARC presented inferior mechanical and physical–chemical properties than bulk-fill and conventional resin composites, with comparable cytotoxicity against Vero cells. Clinical relevance The simplification of the clinical protocol of SARC can minimize the number of possible failures during the restorative technique. However, considering their inferior physical and mechanical properties, their coverage with materials of higher mechanical properties and physical–chemical stability should be considered. Resin composite (dpeaa)DE-He213 Self-adhering resin composite (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bulk-fill resin composite (dpeaa)DE-He213 Hardness (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sorption (dpeaa)DE-He213 Solubility (dpeaa)DE-He213 Cytotoxicity (dpeaa)DE-He213 Espíndola-Castro, Luís Felipe aut Rocha, Julliana Carvalho aut de Barros Albuquerque, Amanda Pinheiro aut de Melo Rêgo, Moacyr Jesus Barreto aut de Melo Monteiro, Gabriela Queiroz aut de Vasconcelos Carvalho, Marianne aut Enthalten in Clinical Oral Investigations Springer-Verlag, 2001 26(2022), 11 vom: 02. Aug., Seite 6663-6670 (DE-627)SPR007794231 nnns volume:26 year:2022 number:11 day:02 month:08 pages:6663-6670 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04624-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 26 2022 11 02 08 6663-6670 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s00784-022-04624-5 doi (DE-627)SPR048569100 (SPR)s00784-022-04624-5-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng de Oliveira, Natália Gomes verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-6937-1537 aut Influence of the self-adhering strategy on microhardness, sorption, solubility, color stability, and cytotoxicity compared to bulk-fill and conventional resin composites 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022 Objectives To analyze and compare, in vitro, the microhardness, sorption, solubility, color stability, and cytotoxicity of three types of resin composites: self-adhesive (SARC) (Dyad Flow (DF)/Kerr), bulk-fill (Filtek Bulk Fill Flow (FBF)/3 M ESPE), and conventional (Filtek Z350XT Flow (Z350)/3 M ESPE). Materials and methods Thirty cylindrical specimens were prepared using a split metal mold (15 mm × 1 mm), divided into 3 groups (n = 10) according to the material used. Vickers hardness (VH) was calculated from three indentations (300gf/15 s) per specimen. The sorption and solubility were measured according to the ISO 4049:2009 specification after storing in distilled water for 7 days. The color of each resin composite was measured using a portable digital spectrophotometer according to the CIELAB system. After a 7-day immersion in coffee, the color variation (∆E) was calculated. Following the ISO 10993:2012, the cytotoxicity in Vero cells was evaluated through the MTT assay. The results were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test to compare the studied groups. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare the assessments in each studied group. For cytotoxicity analysis, the data were compared by the ANOVA test (α = 0.05). Results DF showed the lowest VH (28.67), highest sorption (0.543 µg/$ mm^{3} $) and solubility (1.700 µg/$ mm^{3} $), and higher ∆E after 7 days of coffee immersion (p = 0.008). The resin composites studied were considered non-cytotoxic. Conclusions The SARC presented inferior mechanical and physical–chemical properties than bulk-fill and conventional resin composites, with comparable cytotoxicity against Vero cells. Clinical relevance The simplification of the clinical protocol of SARC can minimize the number of possible failures during the restorative technique. However, considering their inferior physical and mechanical properties, their coverage with materials of higher mechanical properties and physical–chemical stability should be considered. Resin composite (dpeaa)DE-He213 Self-adhering resin composite (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bulk-fill resin composite (dpeaa)DE-He213 Hardness (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sorption (dpeaa)DE-He213 Solubility (dpeaa)DE-He213 Cytotoxicity (dpeaa)DE-He213 Espíndola-Castro, Luís Felipe aut Rocha, Julliana Carvalho aut de Barros Albuquerque, Amanda Pinheiro aut de Melo Rêgo, Moacyr Jesus Barreto aut de Melo Monteiro, Gabriela Queiroz aut de Vasconcelos Carvalho, Marianne aut Enthalten in Clinical Oral Investigations Springer-Verlag, 2001 26(2022), 11 vom: 02. Aug., Seite 6663-6670 (DE-627)SPR007794231 nnns volume:26 year:2022 number:11 day:02 month:08 pages:6663-6670 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04624-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 26 2022 11 02 08 6663-6670 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s00784-022-04624-5 doi (DE-627)SPR048569100 (SPR)s00784-022-04624-5-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng de Oliveira, Natália Gomes verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-6937-1537 aut Influence of the self-adhering strategy on microhardness, sorption, solubility, color stability, and cytotoxicity compared to bulk-fill and conventional resin composites 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022 Objectives To analyze and compare, in vitro, the microhardness, sorption, solubility, color stability, and cytotoxicity of three types of resin composites: self-adhesive (SARC) (Dyad Flow (DF)/Kerr), bulk-fill (Filtek Bulk Fill Flow (FBF)/3 M ESPE), and conventional (Filtek Z350XT Flow (Z350)/3 M ESPE). Materials and methods Thirty cylindrical specimens were prepared using a split metal mold (15 mm × 1 mm), divided into 3 groups (n = 10) according to the material used. Vickers hardness (VH) was calculated from three indentations (300gf/15 s) per specimen. The sorption and solubility were measured according to the ISO 4049:2009 specification after storing in distilled water for 7 days. The color of each resin composite was measured using a portable digital spectrophotometer according to the CIELAB system. After a 7-day immersion in coffee, the color variation (∆E) was calculated. Following the ISO 10993:2012, the cytotoxicity in Vero cells was evaluated through the MTT assay. The results were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test to compare the studied groups. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare the assessments in each studied group. For cytotoxicity analysis, the data were compared by the ANOVA test (α = 0.05). Results DF showed the lowest VH (28.67), highest sorption (0.543 µg/$ mm^{3} $) and solubility (1.700 µg/$ mm^{3} $), and higher ∆E after 7 days of coffee immersion (p = 0.008). The resin composites studied were considered non-cytotoxic. Conclusions The SARC presented inferior mechanical and physical–chemical properties than bulk-fill and conventional resin composites, with comparable cytotoxicity against Vero cells. Clinical relevance The simplification of the clinical protocol of SARC can minimize the number of possible failures during the restorative technique. However, considering their inferior physical and mechanical properties, their coverage with materials of higher mechanical properties and physical–chemical stability should be considered. Resin composite (dpeaa)DE-He213 Self-adhering resin composite (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bulk-fill resin composite (dpeaa)DE-He213 Hardness (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sorption (dpeaa)DE-He213 Solubility (dpeaa)DE-He213 Cytotoxicity (dpeaa)DE-He213 Espíndola-Castro, Luís Felipe aut Rocha, Julliana Carvalho aut de Barros Albuquerque, Amanda Pinheiro aut de Melo Rêgo, Moacyr Jesus Barreto aut de Melo Monteiro, Gabriela Queiroz aut de Vasconcelos Carvalho, Marianne aut Enthalten in Clinical Oral Investigations Springer-Verlag, 2001 26(2022), 11 vom: 02. Aug., Seite 6663-6670 (DE-627)SPR007794231 nnns volume:26 year:2022 number:11 day:02 month:08 pages:6663-6670 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04624-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 26 2022 11 02 08 6663-6670 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s00784-022-04624-5 doi (DE-627)SPR048569100 (SPR)s00784-022-04624-5-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng de Oliveira, Natália Gomes verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-6937-1537 aut Influence of the self-adhering strategy on microhardness, sorption, solubility, color stability, and cytotoxicity compared to bulk-fill and conventional resin composites 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022 Objectives To analyze and compare, in vitro, the microhardness, sorption, solubility, color stability, and cytotoxicity of three types of resin composites: self-adhesive (SARC) (Dyad Flow (DF)/Kerr), bulk-fill (Filtek Bulk Fill Flow (FBF)/3 M ESPE), and conventional (Filtek Z350XT Flow (Z350)/3 M ESPE). Materials and methods Thirty cylindrical specimens were prepared using a split metal mold (15 mm × 1 mm), divided into 3 groups (n = 10) according to the material used. Vickers hardness (VH) was calculated from three indentations (300gf/15 s) per specimen. The sorption and solubility were measured according to the ISO 4049:2009 specification after storing in distilled water for 7 days. The color of each resin composite was measured using a portable digital spectrophotometer according to the CIELAB system. After a 7-day immersion in coffee, the color variation (∆E) was calculated. Following the ISO 10993:2012, the cytotoxicity in Vero cells was evaluated through the MTT assay. The results were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test to compare the studied groups. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare the assessments in each studied group. For cytotoxicity analysis, the data were compared by the ANOVA test (α = 0.05). Results DF showed the lowest VH (28.67), highest sorption (0.543 µg/$ mm^{3} $) and solubility (1.700 µg/$ mm^{3} $), and higher ∆E after 7 days of coffee immersion (p = 0.008). The resin composites studied were considered non-cytotoxic. Conclusions The SARC presented inferior mechanical and physical–chemical properties than bulk-fill and conventional resin composites, with comparable cytotoxicity against Vero cells. Clinical relevance The simplification of the clinical protocol of SARC can minimize the number of possible failures during the restorative technique. However, considering their inferior physical and mechanical properties, their coverage with materials of higher mechanical properties and physical–chemical stability should be considered. Resin composite (dpeaa)DE-He213 Self-adhering resin composite (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bulk-fill resin composite (dpeaa)DE-He213 Hardness (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sorption (dpeaa)DE-He213 Solubility (dpeaa)DE-He213 Cytotoxicity (dpeaa)DE-He213 Espíndola-Castro, Luís Felipe aut Rocha, Julliana Carvalho aut de Barros Albuquerque, Amanda Pinheiro aut de Melo Rêgo, Moacyr Jesus Barreto aut de Melo Monteiro, Gabriela Queiroz aut de Vasconcelos Carvalho, Marianne aut Enthalten in Clinical Oral Investigations Springer-Verlag, 2001 26(2022), 11 vom: 02. Aug., Seite 6663-6670 (DE-627)SPR007794231 nnns volume:26 year:2022 number:11 day:02 month:08 pages:6663-6670 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04624-5 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER AR 26 2022 11 02 08 6663-6670 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Clinical Oral Investigations 26(2022), 11 vom: 02. Aug., Seite 6663-6670 volume:26 year:2022 number:11 day:02 month:08 pages:6663-6670 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Clinical Oral Investigations 26(2022), 11 vom: 02. Aug., Seite 6663-6670 volume:26 year:2022 number:11 day:02 month:08 pages:6663-6670 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Resin composite Self-adhering resin composite Bulk-fill resin composite Hardness Sorption Solubility Cytotoxicity |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Clinical Oral Investigations |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
de Oliveira, Natália Gomes @@aut@@ Espíndola-Castro, Luís Felipe @@aut@@ Rocha, Julliana Carvalho @@aut@@ de Barros Albuquerque, Amanda Pinheiro @@aut@@ de Melo Rêgo, Moacyr Jesus Barreto @@aut@@ de Melo Monteiro, Gabriela Queiroz @@aut@@ de Vasconcelos Carvalho, Marianne @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-08-02T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
SPR007794231 |
| id |
SPR048569100 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR048569100</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230509115518.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221109s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00784-022-04624-5</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR048569100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s00784-022-04624-5-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">de Oliveira, Natália Gomes</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-6937-1537</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Influence of the self-adhering strategy on microhardness, sorption, solubility, color stability, and cytotoxicity compared to bulk-fill and conventional resin composites</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Objectives To analyze and compare, in vitro, the microhardness, sorption, solubility, color stability, and cytotoxicity of three types of resin composites: self-adhesive (SARC) (Dyad Flow (DF)/Kerr), bulk-fill (Filtek Bulk Fill Flow (FBF)/3 M ESPE), and conventional (Filtek Z350XT Flow (Z350)/3 M ESPE). Materials and methods Thirty cylindrical specimens were prepared using a split metal mold (15 mm × 1 mm), divided into 3 groups (n = 10) according to the material used. Vickers hardness (VH) was calculated from three indentations (300gf/15 s) per specimen. The sorption and solubility were measured according to the ISO 4049:2009 specification after storing in distilled water for 7 days. The color of each resin composite was measured using a portable digital spectrophotometer according to the CIELAB system. After a 7-day immersion in coffee, the color variation (∆E) was calculated. Following the ISO 10993:2012, the cytotoxicity in Vero cells was evaluated through the MTT assay. The results were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test to compare the studied groups. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare the assessments in each studied group. For cytotoxicity analysis, the data were compared by the ANOVA test (α = 0.05). Results DF showed the lowest VH (28.67), highest sorption (0.543 µg/$ mm^{3} $) and solubility (1.700 µg/$ mm^{3} $), and higher ∆E after 7 days of coffee immersion (p = 0.008). The resin composites studied were considered non-cytotoxic. Conclusions The SARC presented inferior mechanical and physical–chemical properties than bulk-fill and conventional resin composites, with comparable cytotoxicity against Vero cells. Clinical relevance The simplification of the clinical protocol of SARC can minimize the number of possible failures during the restorative technique. However, considering their inferior physical and mechanical properties, their coverage with materials of higher mechanical properties and physical–chemical stability should be considered.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Resin composite</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Self-adhering resin composite</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bulk-fill resin composite</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Hardness</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sorption</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Solubility</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cytotoxicity</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Espíndola-Castro, Luís Felipe</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rocha, Julliana Carvalho</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">de Barros Albuquerque, Amanda Pinheiro</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">de Melo Rêgo, Moacyr Jesus Barreto</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">de Melo Monteiro, Gabriela Queiroz</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">de Vasconcelos Carvalho, Marianne</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Clinical Oral Investigations</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 2001</subfield><subfield code="g">26(2022), 11 vom: 02. Aug., Seite 6663-6670</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR007794231</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:26</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:11</subfield><subfield code="g">day:02</subfield><subfield code="g">month:08</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:6663-6670</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04624-5</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">26</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">11</subfield><subfield code="b">02</subfield><subfield code="c">08</subfield><subfield code="h">6663-6670</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
de Oliveira, Natália Gomes |
| spellingShingle |
de Oliveira, Natália Gomes misc Resin composite misc Self-adhering resin composite misc Bulk-fill resin composite misc Hardness misc Sorption misc Solubility misc Cytotoxicity Influence of the self-adhering strategy on microhardness, sorption, solubility, color stability, and cytotoxicity compared to bulk-fill and conventional resin composites |
| authorStr |
de Oliveira, Natália Gomes |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)SPR007794231 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
Influence of the self-adhering strategy on microhardness, sorption, solubility, color stability, and cytotoxicity compared to bulk-fill and conventional resin composites Resin composite (dpeaa)DE-He213 Self-adhering resin composite (dpeaa)DE-He213 Bulk-fill resin composite (dpeaa)DE-He213 Hardness (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sorption (dpeaa)DE-He213 Solubility (dpeaa)DE-He213 Cytotoxicity (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
misc Resin composite misc Self-adhering resin composite misc Bulk-fill resin composite misc Hardness misc Sorption misc Solubility misc Cytotoxicity |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Resin composite misc Self-adhering resin composite misc Bulk-fill resin composite misc Hardness misc Sorption misc Solubility misc Cytotoxicity |
| topic_browse |
misc Resin composite misc Self-adhering resin composite misc Bulk-fill resin composite misc Hardness misc Sorption misc Solubility misc Cytotoxicity |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Clinical Oral Investigations |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
SPR007794231 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Clinical Oral Investigations |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)SPR007794231 |
| title |
Influence of the self-adhering strategy on microhardness, sorption, solubility, color stability, and cytotoxicity compared to bulk-fill and conventional resin composites |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR048569100 (SPR)s00784-022-04624-5-e |
| title_full |
Influence of the self-adhering strategy on microhardness, sorption, solubility, color stability, and cytotoxicity compared to bulk-fill and conventional resin composites |
| author_sort |
de Oliveira, Natália Gomes |
| journal |
Clinical Oral Investigations |
| journalStr |
Clinical Oral Investigations |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2022 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
6663 |
| author_browse |
de Oliveira, Natália Gomes Espíndola-Castro, Luís Felipe Rocha, Julliana Carvalho de Barros Albuquerque, Amanda Pinheiro de Melo Rêgo, Moacyr Jesus Barreto de Melo Monteiro, Gabriela Queiroz de Vasconcelos Carvalho, Marianne |
| container_volume |
26 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
de Oliveira, Natália Gomes |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s00784-022-04624-5 |
| normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0001-6937-1537 |
| normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0001-6937-1537 |
| title_sort |
influence of the self-adhering strategy on microhardness, sorption, solubility, color stability, and cytotoxicity compared to bulk-fill and conventional resin composites |
| title_auth |
Influence of the self-adhering strategy on microhardness, sorption, solubility, color stability, and cytotoxicity compared to bulk-fill and conventional resin composites |
| abstract |
Objectives To analyze and compare, in vitro, the microhardness, sorption, solubility, color stability, and cytotoxicity of three types of resin composites: self-adhesive (SARC) (Dyad Flow (DF)/Kerr), bulk-fill (Filtek Bulk Fill Flow (FBF)/3 M ESPE), and conventional (Filtek Z350XT Flow (Z350)/3 M ESPE). Materials and methods Thirty cylindrical specimens were prepared using a split metal mold (15 mm × 1 mm), divided into 3 groups (n = 10) according to the material used. Vickers hardness (VH) was calculated from three indentations (300gf/15 s) per specimen. The sorption and solubility were measured according to the ISO 4049:2009 specification after storing in distilled water for 7 days. The color of each resin composite was measured using a portable digital spectrophotometer according to the CIELAB system. After a 7-day immersion in coffee, the color variation (∆E) was calculated. Following the ISO 10993:2012, the cytotoxicity in Vero cells was evaluated through the MTT assay. The results were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test to compare the studied groups. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare the assessments in each studied group. For cytotoxicity analysis, the data were compared by the ANOVA test (α = 0.05). Results DF showed the lowest VH (28.67), highest sorption (0.543 µg/$ mm^{3} $) and solubility (1.700 µg/$ mm^{3} $), and higher ∆E after 7 days of coffee immersion (p = 0.008). The resin composites studied were considered non-cytotoxic. Conclusions The SARC presented inferior mechanical and physical–chemical properties than bulk-fill and conventional resin composites, with comparable cytotoxicity against Vero cells. Clinical relevance The simplification of the clinical protocol of SARC can minimize the number of possible failures during the restorative technique. However, considering their inferior physical and mechanical properties, their coverage with materials of higher mechanical properties and physical–chemical stability should be considered. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022 |
| abstractGer |
Objectives To analyze and compare, in vitro, the microhardness, sorption, solubility, color stability, and cytotoxicity of three types of resin composites: self-adhesive (SARC) (Dyad Flow (DF)/Kerr), bulk-fill (Filtek Bulk Fill Flow (FBF)/3 M ESPE), and conventional (Filtek Z350XT Flow (Z350)/3 M ESPE). Materials and methods Thirty cylindrical specimens were prepared using a split metal mold (15 mm × 1 mm), divided into 3 groups (n = 10) according to the material used. Vickers hardness (VH) was calculated from three indentations (300gf/15 s) per specimen. The sorption and solubility were measured according to the ISO 4049:2009 specification after storing in distilled water for 7 days. The color of each resin composite was measured using a portable digital spectrophotometer according to the CIELAB system. After a 7-day immersion in coffee, the color variation (∆E) was calculated. Following the ISO 10993:2012, the cytotoxicity in Vero cells was evaluated through the MTT assay. The results were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test to compare the studied groups. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare the assessments in each studied group. For cytotoxicity analysis, the data were compared by the ANOVA test (α = 0.05). Results DF showed the lowest VH (28.67), highest sorption (0.543 µg/$ mm^{3} $) and solubility (1.700 µg/$ mm^{3} $), and higher ∆E after 7 days of coffee immersion (p = 0.008). The resin composites studied were considered non-cytotoxic. Conclusions The SARC presented inferior mechanical and physical–chemical properties than bulk-fill and conventional resin composites, with comparable cytotoxicity against Vero cells. Clinical relevance The simplification of the clinical protocol of SARC can minimize the number of possible failures during the restorative technique. However, considering their inferior physical and mechanical properties, their coverage with materials of higher mechanical properties and physical–chemical stability should be considered. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Objectives To analyze and compare, in vitro, the microhardness, sorption, solubility, color stability, and cytotoxicity of three types of resin composites: self-adhesive (SARC) (Dyad Flow (DF)/Kerr), bulk-fill (Filtek Bulk Fill Flow (FBF)/3 M ESPE), and conventional (Filtek Z350XT Flow (Z350)/3 M ESPE). Materials and methods Thirty cylindrical specimens were prepared using a split metal mold (15 mm × 1 mm), divided into 3 groups (n = 10) according to the material used. Vickers hardness (VH) was calculated from three indentations (300gf/15 s) per specimen. The sorption and solubility were measured according to the ISO 4049:2009 specification after storing in distilled water for 7 days. The color of each resin composite was measured using a portable digital spectrophotometer according to the CIELAB system. After a 7-day immersion in coffee, the color variation (∆E) was calculated. Following the ISO 10993:2012, the cytotoxicity in Vero cells was evaluated through the MTT assay. The results were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test to compare the studied groups. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare the assessments in each studied group. For cytotoxicity analysis, the data were compared by the ANOVA test (α = 0.05). Results DF showed the lowest VH (28.67), highest sorption (0.543 µg/$ mm^{3} $) and solubility (1.700 µg/$ mm^{3} $), and higher ∆E after 7 days of coffee immersion (p = 0.008). The resin composites studied were considered non-cytotoxic. Conclusions The SARC presented inferior mechanical and physical–chemical properties than bulk-fill and conventional resin composites, with comparable cytotoxicity against Vero cells. Clinical relevance The simplification of the clinical protocol of SARC can minimize the number of possible failures during the restorative technique. However, considering their inferior physical and mechanical properties, their coverage with materials of higher mechanical properties and physical–chemical stability should be considered. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER |
| container_issue |
11 |
| title_short |
Influence of the self-adhering strategy on microhardness, sorption, solubility, color stability, and cytotoxicity compared to bulk-fill and conventional resin composites |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04624-5 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Espíndola-Castro, Luís Felipe Rocha, Julliana Carvalho de Barros Albuquerque, Amanda Pinheiro de Melo Rêgo, Moacyr Jesus Barreto de Melo Monteiro, Gabriela Queiroz de Vasconcelos Carvalho, Marianne |
| author2Str |
Espíndola-Castro, Luís Felipe Rocha, Julliana Carvalho de Barros Albuquerque, Amanda Pinheiro de Melo Rêgo, Moacyr Jesus Barreto de Melo Monteiro, Gabriela Queiroz de Vasconcelos Carvalho, Marianne |
| ppnlink |
SPR007794231 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s00784-022-04624-5 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T20:04:03.726Z |
| _version_ |
1803589563164131328 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR048569100</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230509115518.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221109s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00784-022-04624-5</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR048569100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s00784-022-04624-5-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">de Oliveira, Natália Gomes</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-6937-1537</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Influence of the self-adhering strategy on microhardness, sorption, solubility, color stability, and cytotoxicity compared to bulk-fill and conventional resin composites</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Objectives To analyze and compare, in vitro, the microhardness, sorption, solubility, color stability, and cytotoxicity of three types of resin composites: self-adhesive (SARC) (Dyad Flow (DF)/Kerr), bulk-fill (Filtek Bulk Fill Flow (FBF)/3 M ESPE), and conventional (Filtek Z350XT Flow (Z350)/3 M ESPE). Materials and methods Thirty cylindrical specimens were prepared using a split metal mold (15 mm × 1 mm), divided into 3 groups (n = 10) according to the material used. Vickers hardness (VH) was calculated from three indentations (300gf/15 s) per specimen. The sorption and solubility were measured according to the ISO 4049:2009 specification after storing in distilled water for 7 days. The color of each resin composite was measured using a portable digital spectrophotometer according to the CIELAB system. After a 7-day immersion in coffee, the color variation (∆E) was calculated. Following the ISO 10993:2012, the cytotoxicity in Vero cells was evaluated through the MTT assay. The results were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test to compare the studied groups. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare the assessments in each studied group. For cytotoxicity analysis, the data were compared by the ANOVA test (α = 0.05). Results DF showed the lowest VH (28.67), highest sorption (0.543 µg/$ mm^{3} $) and solubility (1.700 µg/$ mm^{3} $), and higher ∆E after 7 days of coffee immersion (p = 0.008). The resin composites studied were considered non-cytotoxic. Conclusions The SARC presented inferior mechanical and physical–chemical properties than bulk-fill and conventional resin composites, with comparable cytotoxicity against Vero cells. Clinical relevance The simplification of the clinical protocol of SARC can minimize the number of possible failures during the restorative technique. However, considering their inferior physical and mechanical properties, their coverage with materials of higher mechanical properties and physical–chemical stability should be considered.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Resin composite</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Self-adhering resin composite</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bulk-fill resin composite</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Hardness</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sorption</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Solubility</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cytotoxicity</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Espíndola-Castro, Luís Felipe</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rocha, Julliana Carvalho</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">de Barros Albuquerque, Amanda Pinheiro</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">de Melo Rêgo, Moacyr Jesus Barreto</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">de Melo Monteiro, Gabriela Queiroz</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">de Vasconcelos Carvalho, Marianne</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Clinical Oral Investigations</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer-Verlag, 2001</subfield><subfield code="g">26(2022), 11 vom: 02. Aug., Seite 6663-6670</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)SPR007794231</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:26</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:11</subfield><subfield code="g">day:02</subfield><subfield code="g">month:08</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:6663-6670</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04624-5</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">26</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">11</subfield><subfield code="b">02</subfield><subfield code="c">08</subfield><subfield code="h">6663-6670</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.400962 |